Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Sarah Palin's 17-year-old daughter is pregnant

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Emerson Wainwright

unread,
Sep 1, 2008, 12:27:10 PM9/1/08
to
ST. PAUL (Reuters) - The 17-year-old daughter of Republican vice
presidential candidate Sarah Palin is pregnant, Palin said on Monday
in an announcement intended to knock down rumors by liberal bloggers
that Palin faked her own pregnancy to cover up for her child.

Bristol Palin, one of Alaska Gov. Palin's five children with her
husband, Todd, is about five months pregnant and is going to keep the
child and marry the father, the Palins said in a statement released by
the campaign of Republican presidential candidate John McCain.

Bristol Palin made the decision on her own to keep the baby, McCain
aides said.

"We have been blessed with five wonderful children who we love with
all our heart and mean everything to us," the Palins' statement said.

"Our beautiful daughter Bristol came to us with news that as parents
we knew would make her grow up faster than we had ever planned. As
Bristol faces the responsibilities of adulthood, she knows she has our
unconditional love and support," the Palins said.

The Palins asked the news media to respect the young couple's privacy.

"Bristol and the young man she will marry are going to realize very
quickly the difficulties of raising a child, which is why they will
have the love and support of our entire family. We ask the media,
respect our daughter and Levi's privacy as has always been the
tradition of children of candidates," the statement concluded.

MCCAIN KNEW

Senior McCain campaign officials said McCain knew of the daughter's
pregnancy when he selected Palin last week as his vice presidential
running mate, deciding that it did not disqualify the 44-year-old
governor in any way.

MORE: http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080901/pl_nm/usa_politics_palin_dc

MikeC

unread,
Sep 1, 2008, 12:28:43 PM9/1/08
to
"Emerson Wainwright" <emersonw...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:f2bf8244-b184-4fb1...@m73g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...

> MCCAIN KNEW
>
> Senior McCain campaign officials said McCain knew of the daughter's
> pregnancy when he selected Palin last week as his vice presidential
> running mate, deciding that it did not disqualify the 44-year-old
> governor in any way.

Gotta agree with McCain here, this is a non-issue. There are plenty of other
reasons to disqualify Palin.


Steve Thomas

unread,
Sep 1, 2008, 12:36:58 PM9/1/08
to
On Sep 1, 11:28 pm, "MikeC" <n0b...@n0where.com> wrote:
> "Emerson Wainwright" <emersonwainwri...@yahoo.com> wrote in message

Like?

MikeC

unread,
Sep 1, 2008, 12:41:33 PM9/1/08
to
"Steve Thomas" <misled...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:d6f0050c-2eb9-4da7...@1g2000pre.googlegroups.com...

Like?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Troopergate, lying about opposing the bridge, ties to anti-American "Alaskan
Independence Party", anti-environment, supports slaughtering bears and
wolves from the air, etc, etc.

Gonna be a fun couple months.

Emerson Wainwright

unread,
Sep 1, 2008, 12:49:01 PM9/1/08
to

How about her pot smoking?

MikeC

unread,
Sep 1, 2008, 12:55:38 PM9/1/08
to
"Emerson Wainwright" <emersonw...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:99212759-900a-450a...@2g2000hsn.googlegroups.com...

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

non issue.


Emerson Wainwright

unread,
Sep 1, 2008, 1:18:37 PM9/1/08
to
On Sep 1, 12:55 pm, "MikeC" <n0b...@n0where.com> wrote:
> "Emerson Wainwright" <emersonwainwri...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:99212759-900a-450a...@2g2000hsn.googlegroups.com...
> On Sep 1, 12:36 pm, Steve Thomas <misledrks...@aol.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Sep 1, 11:28 pm, "MikeC" <n0b...@n0where.com> wrote:
>
> > > "Emerson Wainwright" <emersonwainwri...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> > >news:f2bf8244-b184-4fb1...@m73g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
>
> > > > MCCAIN KNEW
>
> > > > Senior McCain campaign officials said McCain knew of the daughter's
> > > > pregnancy when he selected Palin last week as his vice presidential
> > > > running mate, deciding that it did not disqualify the 44-year-old
> > > > governor in any way.
>
> > > Gotta agree with McCain here, this is a non-issue. There are plenty of
> > > other
> > > reasons to disqualify Palin.
>
> > Like?
>
> How about her pot smoking?
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------­--------
>
> non issue.-

How about her lack of experience, coupled with her pot smoking and her
pro stance with respect to teenage pregnancy?

ayatollah obama

unread,
Sep 1, 2008, 1:31:20 PM9/1/08
to
On Sep 1, 11:49 am, Emerson Wainwright <emersonwainwri...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
> How about her pot smoking?- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Read "Nightmares of my father" by obamarama if you want to know about
drug use... pot, hash, coke, crack, heroin.... your boy obamarama has
done it all!

Reverend Mother Tucker

unread,
Sep 1, 2008, 2:14:37 PM9/1/08
to
On Sep 1, 10:31�am, ayatollah obama
<osama.obabma.by.anyn...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Read "Nightmares of my father" by obamarama if you want to know about
> drug use... pot, hash, coke, crack, heroin.... your boy obamarama has
> done it all!

Our Holy Church's delegation won't arrive up in Alaska 'til next week
to see whether Sister Sarah Palin speaks in True Tongues or not. It's
a looking less 'n' less likely that she's received the Anointing of
the Holy Ghost that will qualify her to be our new president - the way
old Dick Cheney is our president now. There's a reason God wants
women to stay at home with their kids not to whore theirself in the
corporate or the POLITICAL market place. As the good Dr. Laura
Schlessinger will tell you all, women that doesn't stay at home with
their kids during the formative years typically raise slutty
daughters. This girl Bristol Palin - and what kinda name is that for
a child? - didn't never learn how to say no when no is the right
answer. She's way too young to be a doing stuff like 'at - and how
come her mama didn't tell her about rubbers? She obviously didn't
spend enough time on the Abstinence lessons. Is SHE the one that's
supposed to have had the baby that Sister Sarah claims is hers???

If'n Barack Obama-sama had a dope problem too - that's just one more
reason we need a Holy Theocracy in this country and no more of this
idiotic democracy. It's fulla demons anyways. Obama-sama admits he
comes from a seriously broken home. His own grandma had trouble with
his Blackness.

Do any of you all remember the old TV show "The Glass Eye"? Watch it
if'n you can and tell me if'n it reminds you of George W. Bush and
Dick Cheney's little act together.

Sometimes I get afeared that God has turnt His back on this country
and that it's surely a going to hell.


I'll pray for Sister Sarah and her troubled home -

Reverend Mother Lurlean Tucker
True and Faithful FULL Gospel Witness

Emerson Wainwright

unread,
Sep 1, 2008, 2:25:57 PM9/1/08
to
On Sep 1, 2:14 pm, Reverend Mother Tucker <mother-tuc...@wowmail.com>
wrote:

> On Sep 1, 10:31 am, ayatollah obama
>
> <osama.obabma.by.anyn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Read "Nightmares of my father" by obamarama if you want to know about
> > drug use... pot, hash, coke, crack, heroin.... your boy obamarama has
> > done it all!
>
> Our Holy Church's delegation won't arrive up in Alaska 'til next week
> to see whether Sister Sarah Palin speaks in True Tongues or not.  It's
> a looking less 'n' less likely that she's received the Anointing of
> the Holy Ghost that will qualify her to be our new president - the way
> old Dick Cheney is our president now.  There's a reason God wants
> women to stay at home with their kids not to whore theirself in the
> corporate or the POLITICAL market place.  As the good Dr. Laura
> Schlessinger will tell you all, women that doesn't stay at home with
> their kids during the formative years typically raise slutty
> daughters.  This girl Bristol Palin - and what kinda name is that for
> a child? - didn't never learn how to say no when no is the right
> answer.  She's way too young to be a doing stuff like 'at - and how
> come her mama didn't tell her about rubbers?  She obviously didn't
> spend enough time on the Abstinence lessons.  Is SHE the one that's
> supposed to have had the baby that Sister Sarah claims is hers???

I didn't believe it at first... but I've done just a bit of digging.

Gov. Palin did not announce "her" pregnancy until a month before the
baby was born. (She'd have been seven months pregnant when she
announced this, and apparently hiding it VERY well.)

Gov. Palin was in Texas when "her" water broke, a month early. While
experiencing a high-risk pregnancy (her own age, carrying a Down
Syndrome baby, and having signs of impending delivery a month early),
she DECIDED TO FLY TO ALASKA to have "her" baby in a town of 4,500
people.

Apparently, the flight crew didn't notice that a woman about to
deliver was boarding their plane.

Palin did not take maternity leave.

Of course, this evidence is circumstantial. I'd like to see the birth
certificate. And if it's shown that she IS the mother, I'd like to see
a genetic test (since she's Governor of the state in which "she" gave
birth).

Reverend Mother Tucker

unread,
Sep 1, 2008, 3:49:53 PM9/1/08
to
On Sep 1, 11:25�am, Emerson Wainwright <emersonwainwri...@hotmail.com>
wrote:

> I didn't believe it at first... but I've done just a bit of digging.

A digging - a snooping - a rimming - a nosing around. What's the
difference? Did you use your fingers this time or just your nasty old
tongue?

> Gov. Palin did not announce "her" pregnancy until a month before the
> baby was born.

Did you ever think it coulda been a miraculous birth? I just don't
understand how you Godless people can't believe that God sometimes
opens wombs that's other wise dried up from disuse and plants living
fetuses up there. Viagra can help with that situation too, I hear
tell.

> (She'd have been seven months pregnant when she
> announced this, and apparently hiding it VERY well.)

It's cold up in Alaska. People wear heavy coats to keep warm. Maybe
people just didn't notice. I know I coudn't pull it off. I'm such a
petite young thing that my baby's practically stretch me to the
breaking point - but maybe Sister Sarah is different.

> Gov. Palin was in Texas when "her" water broke, a month early. While
> experiencing a high-risk pregnancy (her own age,

Yeah - she's a'most as old as YOU - but not quite!

> carrying a Down Syndrome baby, and having signs of impending delivery a month > early), she DECIDED TO FLY TO ALASKA to have "her" baby in a town of 4,500
> people.

Maybe she had a special mid wife up there that she trusted. You know
how them quack doctors can be. Did anybody notice whether the
daughter that's supposed to a gave birth to this mystery baby was a
showing any signs of it? I know she had the stereo nucleosis and was
shut away for a long time - but surely somebody seen her in alla that
time.

> Apparently, the flight crew didn't notice that a woman about to
> deliver was boarding their plane.

What month was this? She shouldn'ta been a wearing no heavy coat in
Texas except during a frosty spell.

> Palin did not take maternity leave.

She's devoted to her job. Is this miracle baby supposed to be her
daughter Bristol's?

> Of course, this evidence is circumstantial. I'd like to see the birth
> certificate. And if it's shown that she IS the mother, I'd like to see
> a genetic test (since she's Governor of the state in which "she" gave
> birth).

Can't the public demand that kinda information? Doesn't nobody want
another liar in the White House. What were you able to dig up on the
man that committed fornication with young Bristol? How old is he? Is
he white? If'n this mystery baby is his'n, did he stick it to Bristol
before she reached the age of consent? Did they do it at the Palin
home - do they call it the Palindrome by any chance? - while mama was
away a governing the glaciers? Does she want them all to melt so
there can be more greenery up north? What do the Eskimo's thinka her
anyway?

The Palins gave alla their kids funny names: Track, Bristol, Willow,
Piper and Trig. Is Trig the mystery baby? It sure sounds like they
got a whole household fulla confusion. I'm sure we can all safely
blame them homo sexuals for that somehow.


I'll pray for all you nosy sinners -

Reverend Mother Lurlean Tucker
A True Christian FULL Gospel Witness

Guillaume Ier de Normandie

unread,
Sep 1, 2008, 4:36:15 PM9/1/08
to
On Sep 1, 3:49 pm, Reverend Mother Tucker <mother-tuc...@wowmail.com>
wrote:

> On Sep 1, 11:25 am, Emerson Wainwright <emersonwainwri...@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I didn't believe it at first... but I've done just a bit of digging.
>
> A digging - a snooping - a rimming - a nosing around.  What's the
> difference?  Did you use your fingers this time or just your nasty old
> tongue?
>
> > Gov. Palin did not announce "her" pregnancy until a month before the
> > baby was born.
>
> Did you ever think it coulda been a miraculous birth?

Of COURSE I did! And it IS miraculous, because apparently Sarah
Palin's child came out of Sarah Palin's DAUGHTER!


>
> > (She'd have been seven months pregnant when she
> > announced this, and apparently hiding it VERY well.)
>
> It's cold up in Alaska.  People wear heavy coats to keep warm.  Maybe
> people just didn't notice.

I see.

So, at seven months, she said "Oh, BTW, I'm preggers."

>  I know I coudn't pull it off.  I'm such a
> petite young thing that my baby's practically stretch me to the
> breaking point - but maybe Sister Sarah is different.

She looks kinda anorexic, actually.

> > Gov. Palin was in Texas when "her" water broke, a month early. While
> > experiencing a high-risk pregnancy (her own age,
>
> Yeah - she's a'most as old as YOU - but not quite!
>
> > carrying a Down Syndrome baby, and having signs of impending delivery a month > early), she DECIDED TO FLY TO ALASKA to have "her" baby in a town of 4,500
> > people.
>
> Maybe she had a special mid wife up there that she trusted.

Elk are not allowed to deliver babies. Some kinda law up there.
Moose... maybe.

>  You know
> how them quack doctors can be.  Did anybody notice whether the
> daughter that's supposed to a gave birth to this mystery baby was a
> showing any signs of it?

Ummm... yep.

http://www.thehollywoodgossip.com/gallery/sarah-palin-children/

Here's one all blown up:

http://gov.state.ak.us/photos/PalinFamily_Outside_v01.jpg That pic
was taken in 2007.

>  I know she had the stereo nucleosis

And ya know how ya get THAT, don't ya?

> and was
> shut away for a long time

FIVE MONTHS!!! Coinciding precisely with what would have been her
third trimester!

> > Apparently, the flight crew didn't notice that a woman about to
> > deliver was boarding their plane.
>
> What month was this?

April.

>  She shouldn'ta been a wearing no heavy coat in
> Texas except during a frosty spell.
>
> > Palin did not take maternity leave.
>
> She's devoted to her job.

I see. Instead of to her family. Instead of to a premature newborn
with Down Syndrome.

Makes sense.

Just like some other Republicans we know, they can spout OFF about
"family values", while not really displaying any of their own.

 Is this miracle baby supposed to be her
> daughter Bristol's?
>
> > Of course, this evidence is circumstantial. I'd like to see the birth
> > certificate. And if it's shown that she IS the mother, I'd like to see
> > a genetic test (since she's Governor of the state in which "she" gave
> > birth).
>
> Can't the public demand that kinda information?  Doesn't nobody want
> another liar in the White House.

Well, one would THINK someone in some news organization would just get
a copy of the birth record.

But if it shows that Sarah's the mother, I'm gonna wanna see TESTS.

There's something a little creepy about all this.... Documents can be
doctored.

>  What were you able to dig up on the
> man that committed fornication with young Bristol?  How old is he?  Is
> he white?  If'n this mystery baby is his'n, did he stick it to Bristol
> before she reached the age of consent?

Well, with this new pregnancy, I guess they're going to get married.

So GILF Palin apparently is PRO-teenage-pregnancy, and also PRO-
teenage-shotgun-marriage.

While not taking care of her premature newborn Down Syndrome baby.

>  Did they do it at the Palin
> home - do they call it the Palindrome by any chance? - while mama was
> away a governing the glaciers?  Does she want them all to melt so
> there can be more greenery up north?  What do the Eskimo's thinka her
> anyway?
>
> The Palins gave alla their kids funny names: Track, Bristol, Willow,
> Piper and Trig.  Is Trig the mystery baby?

Yes. They were going to name him Algebra, but that's three syllables.

>  It sure sounds like they
> got a whole household fulla confusion.

Indeed.

But of COURSE they're confused.

Sarah Palin doesn't know whether to be a Governor, a GILF, a MILF, a
Beauty Pageant Queen, a VP nominee...

One thing we do know:

She's not a very good mother.

(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) -- NO FACTS Support RRR Cult's Loathsome Agendas!

unread,
Sep 1, 2008, 4:41:13 PM9/1/08
to
On Mon, 1 Sep 2008 09:27:10 -0700 (PDT),
Emerson Wainwright <emersonw...@yahoo.com> wrote:


> ST. PAUL (Reuters) - The 17-year-old daughter of Republican vice

> presidential candidate Sarah Palin is pregnant, ...

... Yeah. And out of wedlock, too. But big whoop. This is
the 21st centur, and no one in possession of a working brain gives
a flying rat's ass about such trivialites that are no one else's business,
anymore.

So even though I'm for Obama, I couldn't care less about making
any hay against Palin over something like THIS.

But, of course, when it comes to PALIN'S desire to see women
again FORCED to gestate unwanted pregnancies to term against
their will... or her desire to see PSEUDO-science taught in schools --
well, THOSE things ARE matters for grave concern.


-- (¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯)

xana...@mchsi.com -- To E-Mail me.
http://www.roadrat.com -- Learn how to get PAID to TRAVEL.
http://apifar.blogspot.com -- Great TACTICS to Fight Bigotry.
http://pro-christian.blogspot.com -- Christianity *vs.* Bigotry.

Guillaume Ier de Normandie

unread,
Sep 1, 2008, 4:50:28 PM9/1/08
to
On Sep 1, 4:41 pm, "(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) -- NO FACTS Support RRR

Cult's Loathsome Agendas!" <xanadu2...@mchsi.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Sep 2008 09:27:10 -0700 (PDT),
>
> Emerson Wainwright <emersonwainwri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > ST. PAUL (Reuters) - The 17-year-old daughter of Republican vice
> > presidential candidate Sarah Palin is pregnant, ...
>
>      ... Yeah.  And out of wedlock, too.  But big whoop.  This is
> the 21st centur, and no one in possession of a working brain gives
> a flying rat's ass about such trivialites that are no one else's business,
> anymore.

I didn't post that as an indication that I personally care. I don't
care socially, either.

Politically, I care.

>     So even though I'm for Obama, I couldn't care less about making
> any hay against Palin over something like THIS.

I could.

It's that "social conservative no-gay-marriage" thing. That "family
values" (unless MY family's involved) thing. That "teach abstinence"
thing. That pro-teenage-shotgun-marriage thing (probably FORCING that
young girl to get married so that the baby isn't born "illegitimate").

And I've gotta tell ya.... that newborn of Palin's....

Something not quite right there...... Something fishy going on up
there in Alaska.....

Trakar

unread,
Sep 1, 2008, 5:02:57 PM9/1/08
to

"(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) -- NO FACTS Support RRR Cult's Loathsome
Agendas!" <xanad...@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:7hkob4pmbee90vglv...@4ax.com...

> But, of course, when it comes to PALIN'S desire to see women
> again FORCED to gestate unwanted pregnancies to term against
> their will... or her desire to see PSEUDO-science taught in schools --
> well, THOSE things ARE matters for grave concern.

And you have evidence that she has pursued these courses? All the evidence I
have seen indicates that these are personal religious beliefs (which by the
way are to one degree or another shared by the vast majority of Americans)
and that she has resisted pressure to legislate these beliefs, rather than
exerted any pressure promoting the legislation of these beliefs. I would be
intersted in seeing any evidence you have to the contrary.


Reverend Mother Tucker

unread,
Sep 1, 2008, 5:03:59 PM9/1/08
to
On Sep 1, 1:41 pm, DOC (Dirty Old Craig) Chilton -- Agent for the Anti-
Christ with NO FACTS on his side <xanadu2...@mchsi.com> babbled:

>      ... Yeah.  And out of wedlock, too.  

I'm so ashamed for her. How can Sister Sarah support family value's
when her own house is in such disarray? I'm a'most reminded of old
Mildred Pierce.

> But big whoop.  

It's a very big "whoop" for A'mighty God. He HATES fornication. The
Holy Bible says He didn't create anyone's body for fornication! He
smites fornicators with plagues of the flesh. Sister Bristol probably
has the human papilloma virus - which is carried in smegma.

> This is the 21st centur,

Centaurs are pagan creatures. God's Holy Law's abide FOREVER!

> and no one in possession of a working brain

See how judgmental this Dirty Old Fornicator is! He's a saying that
the People of God that wants to serve the Lord don't have no brain. I
call that pure EVIL myself!

> gives a flying rat's ass about such trivialites that are no one else's business,
> anymore.

God does. He knows you can't build no kinda lasting family on
fornication. It's evil and wicked.

>     So even though I'm for Obama,

He comes from a seriously broken home and an interracial, interfaith
marriage.

> I couldn't care less about making
> any hay against Palin over something like THIS.

You should. It proves she's a neglectful mother. Holy Queen
Henrietta never had any such problems with her EIGHT precious
children.

>     But, of course, when it comes to PALIN'S desire to see women
> again FORCED to gestate unwanted pregnancies to term against
> their will...

She does NOT desire that. She desires that any woman that doesn't
wanna have no baby can and should say NO. She desires that any woman
that doesn't wanna have no baby can and should keep her legs SHUT.
She even believes that a woman that gets herself raped needs to have
her baby on accounta all rapes are God's Will. They're usually
punishment for a dressing like a whore - but not a'ways. In this
regard God's ONLY True Church is actually a little more liberal than
Sister Sarah.

> or her desire to see PSEUDO-science taught in schools --

Creation Science AIN'T no kinda pseudo science. $cientology is pseudo
science. Astrology is is pseudo science. Palmistry is pseudo
science. TV psychics are a practicing pseudo science. Our Holy
Church KNOWS there's global warming on accounta the over population in
hell. Holy Prince Hubert did a study with a microphone on a long,
long cable to prove it.

> well, THOSE things ARE matters for grave concern.

So why don't you go to your grave and let the resta us deal with them
thru prayer?


I'll pray for all deluded sinners -

Reverend Mother Lurlean Tucker
A TRUE Bible Believing Christian

Reverend Mother Tucker

unread,
Sep 1, 2008, 5:40:04 PM9/1/08
to
On Sep 1, 2:02�pm, "Trakar" <TShaitanaku-at-comcast-dot-net> wrote:

> And you have evidence that she has pursued these courses? All the evidence I
> have seen indicates that these are personal religious beliefs (which by the
> way are to one degree or another shared by the vast majority of Americans)

Dirty Old Craig doesn't believe Fundamentalist True Christians are
entitled to their own religious beliefs. He calls us "brainess,"
"stupid" "lemmings" and members of an "RRR Cult." He's boiled down
the Holy Bible to only the Ten Commandments -- in which the term
"adultery" describes only marital infidelity and never fornication.
He even claims to know which parts of the Bible are inspired by God --
very few, if he's in any way right. But of course he couldn't be more
wrong. I personally believe he signed the Anti-Christ's Agenda a long
time ago and is now serving the devil. He admits to having committed
fornication and lusting after at least one colored woman in his raw
youth.

> and that she has resisted pressure to legislate these beliefs, rather than
> exerted any pressure promoting the legislation of these beliefs. I would be
> intersted in seeing any evidence you have to the contrary.

Evidence? From Dirty Old Craig? He idolizes old Hugh Hefner and his
cheesy foreskin. Would you accept a piece of mudslinging from
"Playboy" magazine to substantiate his evil assertions?


I'll pray for alla you -


Reverend Mother Lurlean W. Tucker

Dysperdis

unread,
Sep 1, 2008, 7:45:05 PM9/1/08
to

And of course, there was her daughter's 8-month absence from school
during the same time period- supposedly for mono, which generally lasts
up to 3 months in the most severe cases.

--
"Because a person's sexual orientation is so integral an aspect of one's
identity, it is not appropriate to require a person to repudiate or
change his or her sexual orientation in order to avoid discriminatory
treatment." ~California Supreme Court decision regarding same-sex marriage
http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/opinions/documents/S147999.PDF

-Sean

(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) -- NO FACTS Support RRR Cult's Loathsome Agendas!

unread,
Sep 1, 2008, 8:21:19 PM9/1/08
to
On Mon, 1 Sep 2008 13:50:28 -0700 (PDT),
Guillaume Ier de Normandie <guillaumed...@live.com> wrote:
> "(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) -- NO FACTS Support RRR
> Cult's Loathsome Agendas!" <xanad...@mchsi.com> wrote:
>> Emerson Wainwright <emersonwainwri...@yahoo.com> wrote:


>>> ST. PAUL (Reuters) - The 17-year-old daughter of Republican vice
>>> presidential candidate Sarah Palin is pregnant, ...

>>      ... Yeah.  And out of wedlock, too.  But big whoop.  This is
>> the 21st centur, and no one in possession of a working brain gives
>> a flying rat's ass about such trivialites that are no one else's business,
>> anymore.

> I didn't post that as an indication that I personally care. I don't
> care socially, either.
>
> Politically, I care.

>>     So even though I'm for Obama, I couldn't care less about making
>> any hay against Palin over something like THIS.

> I could.

> It's that "social conservative no-gay-marriage" thing. That "family
> values" (unless MY family's involved) thing. That "teach abstinence"
> thing. That pro-teenage-shotgun-marriage thing (probably FORCING that
> young girl to get married so that the baby isn't born "illegitimate").
>
> And I've gotta tell ya.... that newborn of Palin's....
>
> Something not quite right there...... Something fishy going on up
> there in Alaska.....

Yep. The RRR Cultists should adopt an official name, as
all other cults already have. My suggestion:

"Hypocrites 'R' Us"

(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) -- NO FACTS Support RRR Cult's Loathsome Agendas!

unread,
Sep 1, 2008, 8:46:49 PM9/1/08
to
On Mon, 1 Sep 2008 14:02:57 -0700,
"Trakar" <TShaitanaku-at-comcast-dot-net> wrote:
> "(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) -- NO FACTS Support RRR Cult's
> Loathsome Agendas!" <xanad...@mchsi.com> wrote:


>> But, of course, when it comes to PALIN'S desire to see women
>> again FORCED to gestate unwanted pregnancies to term against
>> their will... or her desire to see PSEUDO-science taught in schools --
>> well, THOSE things ARE matters for grave concern.

> And you have evidence that she has pursued these courses? All the
> evidence I have seen indicates that these are personal religious beliefs
> (which by the way are to one degree or another shared by the vast
> majority of Americans) and that she has resisted pressure to legislate
> these beliefs, rather than exerted any pressure promoting the legislation
> of these beliefs. I would be intersted in seeing any evidence you have
> to the contrary.

She has very OPENLY advocated those hateful and bigoted agendas.

And the vast majority of Americans OPPOSE the dumbing-down of
students in our schools by teaching them PSEUDO-science.

And per the Gallup Poll, fully 85% of Americans support some or
all abortions. (And any person who supports abortion in ANY circum-
stance is admitting that he or she does NOT equate RPEs with *people.*

(RPE = Reproductive-Process Entity)

In:
http://phylogenomics.blogspot.com/2008/08/sarah-palin-on-evolution-creationism.html

It's reported that Palin was aked:

Q: The education section of the Republican Party of Alaska’s platform
states “We support giving Creation Science equal representation with
other theories of the origin of life. If evolution is taught, it should be
presented as only a theory.” Do you support this position? Why?

A: I support this plank in the Republican Party’s platform. I believe
society can have healthy debates on scientific theories, so equal
representation of creation and evolution shouldn’t be an offense.

So -- what do you suppose "supporting this plank" MEANS?

And -- she is SO rabidly opposed to abortion that she won't
even support it in cases of rape and incest. So what sort of
justices do YOU think she'd choose for the Supreme Court if
McCain were to kick the bucket, and then SHE'D have that
opportunity?

(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) -- NO FACTS Support RRR Cult's Loathsome Agendas!

unread,
Sep 1, 2008, 9:31:09 PM9/1/08
to
On Mon, 1 Sep 2008 14:40:04 -0700 (PDT),
IR-Reverend Mother Fucker (Max)

<mother...@wowmail.com> wrote:
> "Trakar" <TShaitanaku-at-comcast-dot-net> wrote:


>> And you have evidence that she has pursued these courses? All the
>> evidence I have seen indicates that these are personal religious beliefs
>> (which by the way are to one degree or another shared by the vast
>> majority of Americans)

> Craig doesn't believe Fundamentalist Christians are entitled to their
> own religious beliefs.

Outright LIE. As I've already told you, Max --

Probably UNlike you, given your long record of outspoken bigotries,
I FULLY accept, support, and actively defend the right of ALL people
to believe (or not) as they wish. Whether they be Christian, Muslim,
Buddhist, Taoist, atheist, Hindu, agnostic, pagan, Wiccan -- whatever.
That is their perfect RIGHT, and NO buttinsky jerk should EVER attempt
to IMPOSE his/her beliefs on any other person. Ever!!! I oppose such
obnoxiousness just as vigorously as I oppose the imposition of infringe-
ment of any other personal liberty. It was once horrific racism, and
today it the ignorant and hateful attempts by a minority faction of
bigots (the RRR Cult) to again see girls and women FORCED to gestate
UNwanted pregnancies to tem against their will -- and to mindlessly
deny same-sex marriage... which is 100% HARMLESS... to gays.

> He calls us "brainess," "stupid" "lemmings" and members of an
> "RRR Cult."

Not "an." *The* RRR Cult -- the IR-Religious Radical Right. A cult
comprised of PSEUDO-Christian bigots, and some actual Christians who
unfortunately were born with low intellect, and thus were CONNED by
the hate-propaganda spewed by the cult's leaders who TARGET them
to be their lemmings.

There is *nothing* CHRISTIAN about the hateful RRR Cult.

> He's boiled down the Holy Bible to only the Ten Commandments --
> in which the term "adultery" describes only marital infidelity and never
> fornication.

That IS all that it means. And -- I believe that MUCH of the Bible
is Divinely-inspired... not just the 10 Commandments.

> He even claims to know which parts of the Bible are inspired by God --
> very few, if he's in any way right. But of course he couldn't be more
> wrong.

BECAUSE God is perfect, He cannot be the author of confusion. As
the Bible says. BUT, since the Bible contains MANY irrefutable contra-
dictions, it can only be PARTIALLY-inspired. And THAT leaves plenty
of room for some of the writers to have injected some of their OWN
personal opinions, and prejudices into it. After all -- they were writing
LETTERS... and had NO idea that councils of MEN would later compile
those into an anthology. Which we call the Bible. (See SIG.)

<LIE-snip>

> He admits to having committed fornication...

"Admits?" That's nothing to "admit" to. That's something to
remember with relish! :)

> ... and lusting after at least one colored woman in his raw
> youth.

"Raw" youth? I was 23, fer Pete's sake! And she was utterly
beautiful, and WHAT a personality she had! Adorable!! Too bad
we were going to different destinations aboard that bus!

<remaining idiocy flushed>

James Riske

unread,
Sep 1, 2008, 9:56:40 PM9/1/08
to
(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) -- NO FACTS Support RRR Cult's Loathsome
<snip>

And you pick and choose which parts to believe and you "modify" or throw
out altogether those parts in which you disagree, thereby making you a
bible revisionist.

What does the book of revelations say about those who add or take away
from the words of the bible Craig?
I'm not even a christian and even I can point out your lies and
hypocrisy for what it is.


--
Frodo: "Why do you do that?"

Sam: "What?"

Frodo: "Call him names? Run him down all the time."

Sam: "Because that's what he is Mister Frodo. There's naught left in him
but lies and deceit.

James Riske

unread,
Sep 1, 2008, 10:13:17 PM9/1/08
to

You and you kind are quick to point out whatever small and insignificant
"problems" you "think" Palin has and yet you mindlessly dismiss the
muzlim background that stinking half-breed Osama/Obama has behind him,
not to mention he attended a racist church where racist views were
constantly preached and Osama sat there and did nothing about it but I
am sure he has your vote.

Guillaume Ier de Normandie

unread,
Sep 1, 2008, 10:57:45 PM9/1/08
to

Here's a "problem" I *don't* "think" Palin has:

Experience.

She also isn't a good mother. But she just keeps on overpopulating!

(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) -- NO FACTS Support RRR Cult's Loathsome Agendas!

unread,
Sep 1, 2008, 10:59:59 PM9/1/08
to

> He even claims to know which parts of the Bible are inspired by God --


> very few, if he's in any way right. But of course he couldn't be more
> wrong.

>> BECAUSE God is perfect, He cannot be the author of confusion. As
>> the Bible says. BUT, since the Bible contains MANY irrefutable contra-
>> dictions, it can only be PARTIALLY-inspired. And THAT leaves plenty
>> of room for some of the writers to have injected some of their OWN
>> personal opinions, and prejudices into it. After all -- they were writing
>> LETTERS... and had NO idea that councils of MEN would later compile
>> those into an anthology. Which we call the Bible. (See SIG.)

><snip>

> And you pick and choose which parts to believe and you "modify" or throw
> out altogether those parts in which you disagree, thereby making you a

> Bible revisionist.

Wrong on all counts:

(1) I am sensible enough to use the intellect that God gave me
to read the Bible with an eye to which portions are most likely
to have been Divinely-inspired, which ones most likely were
NOT (i.e., non-prophetic portions which contain irrefutable
contradictions or expressions of bigotry that don't align with
Jesus' compassion. All of which has NOTHING to do with
whether or not I happen to "like" or "dislike" something.

(2) Expressing one's opinions (and in my case, well-founded
ones doesn't make ANY person a Bible "revisionist." Even
though I'm a book publisher, I have never published any
Bibles, revised or otherwise. Nor do I plan to.
>
> What does the Book of Revelation say about those who add or
> take away from the words of the Bible Craig?

And just what part of THAT *particular* book have I been
talking about? If you read what that passage in Revelation says,
you'll find that it refers ONLY to the Book of Revelation, and NOT
to the entire Bible. Which hadn't even been compiled yet, when
that was written.

By the way, since ALL prophecies that were made have come to pass
with a perfect record, except for the ones that still lie in OUR future,
it's a pretty safe bet that the Book of Revelation -- which is entirely
comprised of prophecy -- not only is a portion of the Bible that almost
*certainly* was Divinely-inspired... but the prophecies that HAVE come
to pass with no errors provide excellent proof that SOME of the Bible
*was* inspired.

> I'm not even a Christian and even I can point out your lies and

> hypocrisy for what it is.

And you just failed utterly. As do ALL who make that lying claim
about me.

Tell me -- just WHAT is in it for YOU to be making such a fool of
yourself? RRR Cultists *claim* to be Christians, so you MIGHT not
even be one of those. What do you stand to GAIN by being a
bigot (as you've proven to be, in other posts)?

In case you ever decide to be a Christian, may I suggest that you
do yourself and society a big favor? Become an ACTUAL one -- not
a PSEUDO-Christian RRR Cult lemming. Actual Christians comprise
235 million of the USA's 300 million people. RRR Cultists: only 15
million.) Actual Christians are everyone's unobtrusive, sensible,
non-invasive, generally-tolerant, work-a-day next -door neighbors.
If we were anything like the RRR Cultists, this country would be a
tyrannical theocracy that would make the society depicted in George
Orwell's "1984" look pleasant and benign, by comparison.

Dionisio

unread,
Sep 1, 2008, 11:33:24 PM9/1/08
to
Emerson Wainwright wrote:
> Steve Thomas <misledrks...@aol.com> wrote:

>>"MikeC" <n0b...@n0where.com> wrote:
>>>Gotta agree with McCain here, this is a non-issue. There are plenty of other
>>>reasons to disqualify Palin.
>>
>>Like?
>
> How about her pot smoking?

Oh please...

I submit that President Cheech, and VP Chong would have made a better showing than
Bush/Cheney ever managed.

(Though I will give Cheney kudos for mistaking a lawyer for a quacker.)


--
And the Thought of the Moment (TM) is:

"Christ died for our sins. Dare we make his martyrdom meaningless by not committing them?"
-- Jules Pfeiffer

(Brought to you by SigChanger. http://www.phranc.nl)

Reverend Mother Tucker

unread,
Sep 2, 2008, 12:22:42 AM9/2/08
to
On Sep 1, 4:45�pm, Dysperdis <dysper...@gmail.com> wrote:

> And of course, there was her daughter's 8-month absence from school
> during the same time period-

Are you sure it was for eight months? Earlier I heard it was only
five. What's your source? Did you inquire of the Lord for the True
answer?

> supposedly for mono,

I think it grew into stereo - maybe even quadrophonic surround
disease.

> which generally lasts up to 3 months in the most severe cases.

It can last longer - specially if'n your mama neglects you to whore
herself around in politics.

> "Because a person's sexual orientation

Homo sexuality is a disorientation.

> is so integral an aspect of one's identity, it is not appropriate to require a person > to repudiate or change his or her sexual orientation in order to avoid
> discriminatory treatment." ~California Supreme Court decision regarding same-
> sex marriage

You mean them SHAM marriages? God doesn't recognize none of them!
They'll all be over turned soon anyway's. Our Lord defined marriage
as a Sacred Union between one man and one woman - without no kinda
exceptions. Sorry - but those are the facts. The Good New's is that
Our Church can CURE homo sexual desire thru exorcism.

> -Sean

I'll pray for you, brother -
And alla t'others tormented by unnatural homo sexual lust -


Reverend Mother Lurlean W. Tucker

The Lord's Little Lambkin

Bill Baker

unread,
Sep 2, 2008, 1:23:07 AM9/2/08
to
On Monday 01 September 2008 02:14 pm Reverend Mother Tucker
<mother...@wowmail.com> wrote in message
news:<b0f8571e-be03-436d...@n33g2000pri.googlegroups.com>...

> If'n Barack Obama-sama had a dope problem too - that's just one more
> reason we need a Holy Theocracy in this country and no more of this
> idiotic democracy.  It's fulla demons anyways.  Obama-sama admits he
> comes from a seriously broken home.  His own grandma had trouble with
> his Blackness.

Obama-sama? Does that mean you acknowledge him as a great person to be
referring to him with that Japanese honorific?

--
Bushism 8-18:
"It's evolutionary, going from governor to president, and this is a
significant step, to be able to vote for yourself on the ballot, and I'll
be able to do so next fall, I hope."
--In an interview with the Associated Press; March 8, 2000

Reverend Mother Tucker

unread,
Sep 2, 2008, 1:29:44 AM9/2/08
to
On Sep 1, 6:31�pm, DOC (Dirty Old Craig) Chilton, Deeply Confused
Agent for the Anti-Christ who has absolutely NO FACTS on his side
<xanadu2...@mchsi.com> lied again from the Road to Hell he's been on
alla his life:

> IR-Reverend Mother F*****

One more degree of ENDLESS TORMENT in hell for you, you senile old
man. You really need to stop a making funna my Good Name. God hates
that - and He will punish you for a doing it. He will smite you with
boils about the butt.

> (Max)

I ain't Max neither. Dirty Old Craig suffers from gender confusion
too.

> <mother-******@wowmail.com> wrote:

One MORE degree of agony in hell for Dirty Old Craig!

> � � Outright LIE. �As I've already told you, Max �--

I ain't Max. Maybe you'd like to tell ME another lie. I'm Mother
Lurlean. I'm a True Christian.

> � � Probably UNlike you, given your long record of outspoken bigotries,


> I FULLY accept, support, and actively defend the right of ALL people

> to believe (or not) as they wish. �

How can you FULLY accept somebody's religion if'n you call it a
"stupid" "cult" for "mindless" "lemmings"? Where exactly is the
support in them four words? Those are only two among many hateful
words you use every day. What makes you think that a calling me
Mother F****** is something ANY Christian would do? Do you think God
approves of that kinda foul language? Colossians 4:6 says "Let your
speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that ye may know how
ye ought to answer every man". How are the hateful names you call me
in any way "gracious"? Or are you a saying that parta the Bible
ain't inspired? Who set you up as judge over the whole Bible?

> Whether they be Christian, Muslim,
> Buddhist, Taoist, atheist, Hindu, agnostic, pagan, Wiccan -- whatever.
> That is their perfect RIGHT, and NO buttinsky jerk should EVER attempt

> to IMPOSE his/her beliefs on any other person. �Ever!!! �

Ain't that EXACTLY what you do? Consider your hateful beliefs about
True Christians like me? About people that opposes abortion on
demand. And about people that knows there's something wrong with homo
sexual lust. You encourage people to go out and commit fornication.
When the Word of God says "the body is not for fornication, but for
the Lord; and the Lord for the body" (I Corinthians 6:13) - are you a
saying that ain't inspired teaching? What about when Jesus lists
fornication in a catalogue of sins in Mark 7:20-25? Who are you to
say those sins don't apply to you? Who gave you a special exemption?

> I oppose such
> obnoxiousness just as vigorously as I oppose the imposition of infringe-

> ment of any other personal liberty. �

And yet you call me ugly names every day of the week. Shame on you!

> It was once horrific racism, and
> today it the ignorant and hateful attempts by a minority faction of
> bigots (the RRR Cult)

See what I mean? Don't members of this religious group have every
right to their beliefs? Maybe they think you're in a cult of flesh
worship and secularism. What gives you any authority to pass judgment
on them? Why do you define them as bigots when they're ONLY a trying
to live according to the Word of God? Unlike YOU they don't pick and
choose random verses to obey while presumptuously ignoring alla the
others.

> to again see girls and women FORCED to gestate

Exactly who is a forcing a woman that says yes to unprotected sex and
then spreads her legs wide for some man whose baby she doesn't even
wanna have to give birth to? Why can't she say no? Why can't her sex
partner use rubbers? Why can't he pull it out? Why can't she get on
the Pill? Why can't she use a diaphragm? Why can't she use an IUD?
Why can't she douche after a committing fornication? Why can't she
have her baby and give it up for adoption? Why can't she get her
tubes tied? Why can't she go to bed with a man that's had a
vasectomy? Why can't she take some responsibility for her actions and
not just murder her living fetus? If'n she really wants to kill
somebody, why doesn't she kill herself? If'n she gets raped and she
didn't provoke it none, Our Holy Church will help her. Other wise -
what if'n she has her baby and decides she can't feed it nor take good
care of it? That happens alla the time. Should she be allowed to
kill her baby then? Should she be allowed to cut the nutty buddy's
offa the man she wants to have sex with? That's the best way to stop
the production of spooge for good.

You won't answer nunna these RATIONAL questions. You'll just mock me
and go on a thinking you're something special - 'til God catches up
with you. Then you will BURN!

> UNwanted pregnancies to tem against their will --

If'n a woman really doesn't wanna have no baby's, why can't she take
some real precautions? Our Church doesn't make no allowances for
incest lessen it involves rape.

> and to mindlessly deny same-sex marriage...

There ain't no such thing! The Lord Jesus defined marriage as the
Sacred Union between one man and one woman. He didn't say nothing
about two men. He did condemn fornication, lasciviousness and
covetousness in His Holy Gospel. All homo sexuality is by definition
fornication.

> which is 100% HARMLESS... to gays.

If'n queer sex is so harmless why did so many city's close down alla
their bath houses and sex clubs to prevent the spreada the AIDS? Why
it is that queer men can't donate no blood? Why is it that a THIRD of
the queer men a living in New York has been struck down with the
herpes. YOU may think it ain't no big deal - but it can cause serious
harm to the nervous system.

> � � Not "an." �*The* RRR Cult -- the IR-Religious Radical Right. �

Are you a saying that our version of Christianity ain't even a
religion in your book? What criteria do you use to make that judgment?

> A cult comprised of PSEUDO-Christian

Who are you to say who is and who ain't a Christian? What's your
definition of a Christian?

> bigots,

Who are you to say who is and who ain't a bigot? What's your
definition of a bigot? What are the people YOU label as bigots
supposed to do? Give up their religion to please you? I thought you
supported their rights to freedom of conscience? I guess you were
just a lying again, HUH?

> and some actual Christians who unfortunately were born with low intellect,

So in order to accept True Christian teachings, people's gotta be born
with low intellect? Can somebody born with low intellect upgrade to
high intellect? How can they do that? When they do, are they
supposed to give up their religion just to please 1) an old fornicator
like you, 2) slutty women that wants to kill their baby's and 3) sex
deviants that wants to mock marriage? Most queers don't wanna mock
marriage. They like a screwing around too much!

> and thus were CONNED by
> the hate-propaganda spewed by the cult's leaders who TARGET them
> to be their lemmings.

When these people becomes "lemmings" do they give up their humanity?
What are these people supposed to do? Dive offa cliff and die? Adopt
your brand of "religion" and start over looking what they consider to
be sin and wickedness?

> � � There is *nothing* CHRISTIAN about the hateful RRR Cult.

What is a Christian then? Who gets to decide? Even if Fundamentalist
Christians ain't Christians according to your narrow and
unconventional definition, what are they supposed to do? Join the
Unitarian Church? Start a fornicating so even more marriages will be
broke up and even more diseases will be spread?

> � � �That IS all that it means. �

How do you know? Where did you study the Holy Hebrew Tongue? In the
parlance of the Holy Bible, what's the difference between marriage
outside sex and adultery? When Isaiah and Ezekiel preach against
fornication, are their sermons inspired? How can you tell? Do you
think God inspired the Bible just for your personal benefit?

> And -- I believe that MUCH of the Bible
> is Divinely-inspired... not just the 10 Commandments.

But you get to decide which parts are inspired and which parts ain't -
is that it?

> � � �BECAUSE God is perfect, He cannot be the author of confusion. �

He ain't no such thing! But that doesn't mean He made the Bible
simple for the unlettered to understand - any more than He created the
universe according to a simple design.

> As the Bible says. �BUT, since the Bible contains MANY irrefutable contra-
> dictions,

True Christians don't agree with you there. The Bible is limited ONLY
when its readers are limited.

> it can only be PARTIALLY-inspired. �

Who gets do decide which parts are inspired then? You? According to
what criteria?

> And THAT leaves plenty
> of room for some of the writers to have injected some of their OWN
> personal opinions, and prejudices into it. �After all -- they were writing
> LETTERS... and had NO idea that councils of MEN would later compile
> those into an anthology. �Which we call the Bible. �(See SIG.)

If'n God inspired the Holy Bible, His inspiration continued thru out
the process of Biblical redaction. He preserved His Word entirely
without error. You may not understand it all - but that doesn't make
it ANY less inspired. You're imposing YOUR many limitations of God's
Word. He HATES that!

> <LIE-snip>

I don't NEVER lie. I see you can't REFUTE my preaching. You just
ignore it.

> � � "Admits?" �That's nothing to "admit" to. �That's something to
> remember with relish! �:)

What does the Holy Bible say about fornication?

> � � "Raw" youth? �I was 23, fer Pete's sake! �And she was utterly


> beautiful, and WHAT a personality she had! �Adorable!! �Too bad
> we were going to different destinations aboard that bus!

Did you fantasize about her smooth, young Black body after that brief
encounter? What about her thick, wiry pubic hair? What did the Lord
Jesus say about that?

> <remaining idiocy flushed>

Idiocy? There you go again a dismissing the Preaching of the Cross
with bitter judgment in your heart. You SERIOUSLY need to repent and
get right with A'mighty God NOW!!!


I will pray for your DEEPLY endangered soul -

Reverend Mother Tucker
A TRUE Bible Believing Christian Gospel Witness

Dysperdis

unread,
Sep 2, 2008, 1:45:14 AM9/2/08
to
Reverend Mother Tucker wrote:
> On Sep 1, 4:45�pm, Dysperdis <dysper...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> And of course, there was her daughter's 8-month absence from school
>> during the same time period-
>
> Are you sure it was for eight months? Earlier I heard it was only
> five.

I read that it was 8 months, though I can't remember where I read it.
Either way, it keeps sounding more and more like Palin's been less than
honest about her family.


--
"Because a person's sexual orientation is so integral an aspect of one's

identity, it is not appropriate to require a person to repudiate or
change his or her sexual orientation in order to avoid discriminatory

WBY...@ireland.com

unread,
Sep 2, 2008, 11:57:14 AM9/2/08
to
On Mon, 1 Sep 2008 14:40:04 -0700 (PDT), Reverend Mother Tucker
<mother...@wowmail.com> wrote:

>On Sep 1, 2:02?pm, "Trakar" <TShaitanaku-at-comcast-dot-net> wrote:
>
>> And you have evidence that she has pursued these courses? All the evidence I
>> have seen indicates that these are personal religious beliefs (which by the
>> way are to one degree or another shared by the vast majority of Americans)
>
>Dirty Old Craig doesn't believe Fundamentalist True Christians are
>entitled to their own religious beliefs. He calls us "brainess,"
>"stupid" "lemmings" and members of an "RRR Cult."

You're welcome to any belief you wish - no matter how righteous or
kooky. It's the American way. What you're NOT welcome to do is to seek
to force any of them on either the government (church/state works both
ways) or the citizenry.

BTW - what is a true "Christian"? Can you even prove that the Christ
was historical? Do you accept the Bible as fact and not belief? Do you
accept freedom of choice? Does your chewing gum lose its flavor on the
bedpost overnight? We're all on pins and needles waiting for your
answer.

WB Yeats

z

unread,
Sep 2, 2008, 3:14:42 PM9/2/08
to
On Sep 1, 12:27 pm, Emerson Wainwright <emersonwainwri...@yahoo.com>

wrote:
> ST. PAUL (Reuters) - The 17-year-old daughter of Republican vice
> presidential candidate Sarah Palin is pregnant, Palin said on Monday
> in an announcement intended to knock down rumors by liberal bloggers
> that Palin faked her own pregnancy to cover up for her child.
>
> Bristol Palin, one of Alaska Gov. Palin's five children with her
> husband, Todd, is about five months pregnant and is going to keep the
> child and marry the father, the Palins said in a statement released by
> the campaign of Republican presidential candidate John McCain.
>
> Bristol Palin made the decision on her own to keep the baby, McCain
> aides said.
>
> "We have been blessed with five wonderful children who we love with
> all our heart and mean everything to us," the Palins' statement said.
>
> "Our beautiful daughter Bristol came to us with news that as parents
> we knew would make her grow up faster than we had ever planned. As
> Bristol faces the responsibilities of adulthood, she knows she has our
> unconditional love and support," the Palins said.
>
> The Palins asked the news media to respect the young couple's privacy.
>
> "Bristol and the young man she will marry are going to realize very
> quickly the difficulties of raising a child, which is why they will
> have the love and support of our entire family. We ask the media,
> respect our daughter and Levi's privacy as has always been the
> tradition of children of candidates," the statement concluded.

>
> MCCAIN KNEW
>
> Senior McCain campaign officials said McCain knew of the daughter's
> pregnancy when he selected Palin last week as his vice presidential
> running mate, deciding that it did not disqualify the 44-year-old
> governor in any way.
>
> MORE:  http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080901/pl_nm/usa_politics_palin_dc

John Edwards is already denying everything.

Dennis

unread,
Sep 2, 2008, 3:54:06 PM9/2/08
to

"z" <gzuc...@snail-mail.net> wrote in message
news:50dbed56-9160-42bc...@p25g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...

*********
Now that's funny.

"Cesspool Slurpers," an accurate and most apt description of the loony left
scummers attempting to destroy Sarah Palin's family. They should check out
the age and marital status of Br-a-a-a-a-a-ck, The Magic Mulatto's mammy
when she a'birthed him.

Dionysus

Cousin Purlean Huggins

unread,
Sep 2, 2008, 9:22:36 PM9/2/08
to
On Sep 1, 10:23�pm, Bill Baker <wba...@postini.spamcon.org> wrote:

> Obama-sama? �Does that mean you acknowledge him as a great person to be
> referring to him with that Japanese honorific?

I doubt that's what my baby cousin had in mind -- but who knows?
Maybe she could grow to appreciate Senator Obama. Do you think he'll
support any faith-based initiatives? Lurlean gave birth to a
beautiful baby boy this afternoon. Sherwin Andrew Tucker was born at
2:13 PM Pacific Coast Time. Aren't you happy for the proud parents?
He's got his daddy's eyes and his mama's mouth =-= sort of. Both
mother and child are doing fine -- even though little Sherwin was over
a week late! I'm sure Lurlean will be more calm when she comes back
here to preach again soon. Right now we're all getting ready for
little Sherwin's circumcision next week.


Praise the Lord! Unto us a child is born!


Cousin Purlean Huggins
Your Heavenly Connection

Please send money.

Cousin Purlean Huggins

unread,
Sep 2, 2008, 9:35:28 PM9/2/08
to
On Sep 2, 8:57�am, WBYe...@Ireland.com wrote:

> You're welcome to any belief you wish - no matter how righteous or
> kooky. It's the American way. What you're NOT welcome to do is to seek
> to force any of them on either the government (church/state works both
> ways) or the citizenry.

We don't believe in forcing religion on anyone. We believe in
cultivating public morality to gain God's blessings. We don't insist
that people attend any church, for example, but we see a lot of good
in preventing homo-sexuals from mocking the kind of marriage that God
ordained in the Garden of Eden and that Jesus later blessed as the


Sacred Union between one man and one woman.

> BTW - what is a true "Christian"?

A True Christian is a Bible-believing Christian who lives his or life
according to the sacred teachings of the Lord Jesus Christ. True
Christians eschew fornication.

> Can you even prove that the Christ was historical?

He not only was but is! I've seen Him in my Church many times. He's
caught me up in His Spirit and taken me to faraway realms.

> Do you accept the Bible as fact and not belief?

Yes. Some of its language is symbolic, of course, but the historical
accounts in the Bible are mostly reliable. Archaeology has proved as
much.

> Do you accept freedom of choice?

Within certain limits, yes. A woman who chooses to destroy her unborn
child, for example, is committing murder and will answer to the Lord
as a murderess.

> Does your chewing gum lose its flavor on the bedpost overnight?

I rarely chew gum any more, amd I never leave it stuck to a bedpost.
Is that even sanitary? Who knows what may land on it while it's
there?

> We're all on pins and needles waiting for your answer.

Suffer no more! I'm here to help you find Jesus. Have you visited my
baby cousin's Repenthouse?

> WB Yeats

You are not! He's in hell!


I'll pray for you,

Tuge Hits

unread,
Sep 2, 2008, 9:46:19 PM9/2/08
to
On Sep 2, 9:22 pm, Cousin Purlean Huggins <purl...@wowmail.com> wrote:
> On Sep 1, 10:23 pm, Bill Baker <wba...@postini.spamcon.org> wrote:
>
> > Obama-sama? Does that mean you acknowledge him as a great person to be
> > referring to him with that Japanese honorific?
>
> I doubt that's what my baby cousin had in mind -- but who knows?
> Maybe she could grow to appreciate Senator Obama.  Do you think he'll
> support any faith-based initiatives?  Lurlean gave birth to a
> beautiful baby boy this afternoon.  Sherwin Andrew Tucker was born at
> 2:13 PM Pacific Coast Time.  Aren't you happy for the proud parents?
> He's got his daddy's eyes and his mama's mouth


From which parent did he inherit the horns and pointy red tail?

Tuge Hits

unread,
Sep 2, 2008, 9:47:32 PM9/2/08
to
On Sep 2, 9:35 pm, Cousin Purlean Huggins <purl...@wowmail.com> wrote:

> I rarely chew gum any more

Kinda hard once the teeth fall out.

WBY...@ireland.com

unread,
Sep 3, 2008, 10:18:36 AM9/3/08
to
On Tue, 2 Sep 2008 18:35:28 -0700 (PDT), Cousin Purlean Huggins
<pur...@wowmail.com> wrote:

>On Sep 2, 8:57?am, WBYe...@Ireland.com wrote:
>
>> You're welcome to any belief you wish - no matter how righteous or
>> kooky. It's the American way. What you're NOT welcome to do is to seek
>> to force any of them on either the government (church/state works both
>> ways) or the citizenry.
>
>We don't believe in forcing religion on anyone. We believe in
>cultivating public morality to gain God's blessings. We don't insist
>that people attend any church, for example, but we see a lot of good
>in preventing homo-sexuals from mocking the kind of marriage that God
>ordained in the Garden of Eden and that Jesus later blessed as the
>Sacred Union between one man and one woman.

Fantasy and homophobia makes a true Christian.

>> BTW - what is a true "Christian"?
>
>A True Christian is a Bible-believing Christian who lives his or life
>according to the sacred teachings of the Lord Jesus Christ. True
>Christians eschew fornication.

This leaves out most of the world. Where do little Christians come
from?

>> Can you even prove that the Christ was historical?
>
>He not only was but is! I've seen Him in my Church many times. He's
>caught me up in His Spirit and taken me to faraway realms.

Gee - I saw Elvis the other day. There is no proof, none, nada that
the man ever existed. You BELIEVE he existed.

>> Do you accept the Bible as fact and not belief?
>
>Yes. Some of its language is symbolic, of course, but the historical
>accounts in the Bible are mostly reliable. Archaeology has proved as
>much.

Archaeology has proven that there were a few historical events from
the Old Testament which the Xtians stole from the Jews who knew much
of it was mythology and symbolism. Christians are more about the New
Testament which has a lot of good stuff but very little in the way of
history except that folks did return to their homes in 0 CE to be
taxed.

>> Do you accept freedom of choice?
>
>Within certain limits, yes. A woman who chooses to destroy her unborn
>child, for example, is committing murder and will answer to the Lord
>as a murderess.

So you're a true Christian if you're against abortion? Sure thing.
Abstinence makes the heart grow fonder - we've seen how well that
works.

>> Does your chewing gum grow its flavor on the bedpost overnight?


>
>I rarely chew gum any more, amd I never leave it stuck to a bedpost.
>Is that even sanitary? Who knows what may land on it while it's
>there?

Ah - still in the literal stage of development, are you?

WB Yeats
Alive 'n Kickin'

Bill Baker

unread,
Sep 3, 2008, 1:15:40 PM9/3/08
to
On Tuesday 02 September 2008 09:22 pm Cousin Purlean Huggins
<pur...@wowmail.com> wrote in message
news:<319445ad-91c6-403e...@q26g2000prq.googlegroups.com>...

> On Sep 1, 10:23pm, Bill Baker <wba...@postini.spamcon.org> wrote:
>
>> Obama-sama? Does that mean you acknowledge him as a great person to be
>> referring to him with that Japanese honorific?
>
> I doubt that's what my baby cousin had in mind -- but who knows?
> Maybe she could grow to appreciate Senator Obama.

Until she learns that presidents don't have the power to hand over the
presidency to her church.

> Do you think he'll support any faith-based initiatives?

Maybe, but hopefully just token support, enough to keep the religious
crazies happy.

> Lurlean gave birth to a beautiful baby boy this afternoon. Sherwin Andrew
> Tucker was born at 2:13 PM Pacific Coast Time. Aren't you happy for the
> proud parents?

I still haven't seen any proof that any of her children exist or that you're
not all the creation of Max Varazslo. Perhaps a scanned copy of the birth
certificate would help convince me.

> He's got his daddy's eyes and his mama's mouth =-= sort of. Both
> mother and child are doing fine -- even though little Sherwin was over
> a week late! I'm sure Lurlean will be more calm when she comes back
> here to preach again soon. Right now we're all getting ready for
> little Sherwin's circumcision next week.
>
>
> Praise the Lord! Unto us a child is born!
>
>
> Cousin Purlean Huggins
> Your Heavenly Connection
>
> Please send money.

So how did your brainwashing session with Thurgood go? Are you back to
worshiping Satan like he and his wife do?

--
Bushism 3-21:
"It's important for young men and women who look at the Nebraska champs to
understand that quality of life is more than just blocking shots."
--Remarks to the University of Nebraska women's volleyball team, the 2001
national champions; Washington, D.C.; May 31, 2001

Bill Baker

unread,
Sep 3, 2008, 1:16:15 PM9/3/08
to
On Tuesday 02 September 2008 09:46 pm Tuge Hits <tuge...@yahoo.com> wrote
in message
news:<1b1df3c4-e7bb-456f...@m44g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>...

LOL!

--
Bushism 2-18/19:
"I mean, if you've ever been a governor of a state, you understand the vast
potential of broadband technology, you understand how hard it is to make
sure that physics, for example, is taught in every classroom in the state.
It's difficult to do. It's, like, cost-prohibitive."
--Washington, D.C.; June 24, 2004

juanjo

unread,
Sep 3, 2008, 2:45:49 PM9/3/08
to

The problems of the Palin family are exactly that, the problems of the
Palin family. I could care less because because kids of politicians
do become pregnant out of wedlock regardless of party affiliation.
But what strikes me as supremely hypocritical is the stance of the OP
and other Republicans who make up lies like that above about Bill
Clinton and expect it to pass simply because it has been 8 years since
Bill was in the White House. There were never any allegations of such
taking place and no evidence put forward to support allegations of
such behaviour. And there were plenty of Republican attack dogs
looking for anything to smear him with from the time he announced his
candidacy until he left the White House.

Now on to other matters. Mrs Palin concerns me on a variety of
levels. She is from a state of population 600,000 and was at one time
a member of the so-called "independence party" in that state. As
mayor she ran a town of less than 10,000 people, hardly a big deal.
She has no idea what a vice president does. She has no idea when the
Pledge of Allegiance was first put into words or when the phrase
"under God" was added to it or why. She is anti choice and she is
oblivious to the environment. She wanted to ban books from the town
library when she entered office but apparently was dissuaded of that
foolhardy action by cooler heads. She knows nothing of foreign
affairs and has shown some very questionable personal choices in her
life, like flying across country while in labor putting an infant at
risk. I admire her for sticking by her daughter during this pregnancy
but I question her judgment in the shot gun marriage approach to
solving a family situation given the ages of children involved and the
fact that such marriages often end in failure statistically.

But Mrs. Palin is red meat being tossed to the wolves by the McCain
people. They want people to attack her in hopes of solidifying their
conservative religious base which is none too thrilled about McCain.
She was not picked because she was qualified for the position, in fact
she is eminently unqualified for the job. But she diverts discussion
away from other issues, the real issues of the campaign. McCain's
candidacy is Bush redux, more of the same and nothing else. Despite
McCain's often touted claim of being a maverick, he has towed the
party line 90% of the time and has supported Bush's policies when ever
it was important to do so. In economic policy and energy policy as
well as foreign policy he is lined up with Bush and the failed
policies of this administration perfectly. So we can expect continued
foreign intervention abroad, a continuance of the oil first lobby's
proposals, continued cuts in taxes for rich corporation and top 1% of
the population who own virtually everything in this country while the
middle class and poor make do with less and let us not forget the
continued use of cheap immigrant [illegal] labor to undercut the wages
of American citizens and residents.

The Republican party no longer stands for the principles on which it
was founded. If Abraham Lincoln and Teddy Roosevelt were alive today
they would be screaming their heads off. The present Republican Party
has declared war on the middle class and the poor, undercutting
programs that support education, social development, justice and work
safety, encourage the shipment of American jobs overseas with nothing
real to replace them [just low paying service industry jobs], while
our infrastructure slides into oblivion from lack of upkeep much less
development. The buying power of the dollar has slid so low that
Canadian are asking American shop keepers "how much is that in real
dollars" while American retirees and poor are deciding whether to eat
this week or pay for medicines they need to sustain life. Not since
the Gilded Age has there been such a disparity between what the
working and middle classes earn and what the rich earn. Not since the
Gilded Age has there been such a disparity between the access to
education, medical care, and economic advancement between the poor,
working class and middle class and the rich. The working class and
middle class struggle to keep a roof over their heads while the rich
struggle to decide whether to buy another multimillion dollar vacation
"cottage" in Jackson Hole or Sun Valley.

But are we offered any serious discussion about medical care reform,
economic policies, energy independence policies etc.? Of course not.
Instead we are bombarded with nonsense about Clinton using cocaine
[untrue] and hypocritical denunciations of people who question Mrs.
Palin's family management policy when we all know that if Mrs. Palin
were a Democrat those same people would be denouncing her as the Whore
of Babylon. The fact is that entire scenario is too disgusting for
words. The Republic has fallen my friends and the Imperium has
commenced. The founding Fathers must be spinning in their graves.
The Republic they fought so long and hard for has ceased to exist,
replaced by an Empire complete with bread and circuses for the masses.

Dragonblaze

unread,
Sep 3, 2008, 5:08:42 PM9/3/08
to
On Sep 3, 2:46 am, Tuge Hits <tugeh...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Sep 2, 9:22 pm, Cousin Purlean Huggins <purl...@wowmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Sep 1, 10:23 pm, Bill Baker <wba...@postini.spamcon.org> wrote:
>
> > > Obama-sama? Does that mean you acknowledge him as a great person to be
> > > referring to him with that Japanese honorific?
>
> > I doubt that's what my baby cousin had in mind -- but who knows?
> > Maybe she could grow to appreciate Senator Obama.  Do you think he'll
> > support any faith-based initiatives?  Lurleangave birth to a
> > beautiful baby boy this afternoon.  Sherwin AndrewTuckerwas born at

> > 2:13 PM Pacific Coast Time.  Aren't you happy for the proud parents?
> > He's got his daddy's eyes and his mama's mouth
>
> From which parent did he inherit the horns and pointy red tail?

Here's something that would fit Lurlean Tucker perfectly - were she
not a fictional character:

http://adult.engrish.com/page/4/

The second one from top.

Dionisio

unread,
Sep 3, 2008, 8:56:05 PM9/3/08
to
juanjo wrote:

> The problems of the Palin family are exactly that, the problems of the
> Palin family.

Ahem. She will be second in command of the American family, *if* they win the election.
Now, unlike biological families, the political family that America chooses *can* be chosen.

The President is our figurative "father." The Veep, our "mother." And their antics will
reflect on us, and be covered the world over.

A rather wise man -- whom both on the GOP ticket claim to know personally -- once said
that you can know a person by who they associate with.

It may be just me, but I think America has associated with idiots long enough.


--
And the Thought of the Moment (TM) is:

For example, the Court in _Cleveland Board of Education v LaFleur_ [414 U.S. 632 (1974)]
declared that "it has long recognized that freedom of personal choice in matters of
marriage and family life is one of the liberties protected by the Due Process Clause of
the Fourteenth Amendment".

Furthermore, in _Moore v City of East Cleveland_ [431 U.S. 494 (1977)], the Court held
that the state cannot "standardiz[e]" its citizens" by forcing them all to live in certain
narrowly defined family patterns," and in _Roberts v United States Jaycees_ [486 U.S. 609
(1984)] that freedom of association extends to "certain kinds of personal relationships"
that "act as critical buffers between the individual and the power of the state." So it
seems that the government "simply has no authority to pressure individuals into
heterosexual relationships, by giving only those relationships the benefits and
protections of the
law"[*].

* _Sexual Orientation and the Law_, the Editors of the Harvard Law Review, Harvard
University Press, 1989.
-- rel...@netcom.com (Heather Downs), 4 Jan 1995

Harold Burton

unread,
Sep 3, 2008, 9:03:44 PM9/3/08
to
In article
<99212759-900a-450a...@2g2000hsn.googlegroups.com>,
Emerson Wainwright <emersonw...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> On Sep 1, 12:36 pm, Steve Thomas <misledrks...@aol.com> wrote:
> > On Sep 1, 11:28 pm, "MikeC" <n0b...@n0where.com> wrote:
> >
> > > "Emerson Wainwright" <emersonwainwri...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >
> > >news:f2bf8244-b184-4fb1...@m73g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...


> >
> > > > MCCAIN KNEW
> >
> > > > Senior McCain campaign officials said McCain knew of the daughter's
> > > > pregnancy when he selected Palin last week as his vice presidential
> > > > running mate, deciding that it did not disqualify the 44-year-old
> > > > governor in any way.
> >

> > > Gotta agree with McCain here, this is a non-issue. There are plenty of
> > > other
> > > reasons to disqualify Palin.
> >
> > Like?
>
> How about her pot smoking?


Did she inhale? Well if she did, immediate disqualification, unlike
slick willie who didn't, at least according to his story.


Snicker.

Harold Burton

unread,
Sep 3, 2008, 9:07:43 PM9/3/08
to
In article <EmGvk.19156$DI2....@fe02.news.easynews.com>,
Dionisio <moc.rr.t...@5ellimd.com> wrote:

> juanjo wrote:
>
> > The problems of the Palin family are exactly that, the problems of the
> > Palin family.
>
> Ahem. She will be second in command of the American family, *if* they win the
> election.
> Now, unlike biological families, the political family that America chooses
> *can* be chosen.
>
> The President is our figurative "father." The Veep, our "mother." And their
> antics will
> reflect on us, and be covered the world over.
>
> A rather wise man -- whom both on the GOP ticket claim to know personally --
> once said
> that you can know a person by who they associate with.
>
> It may be just me, but I think America has associated with idiots long
> enough.

Yep, but given that the alternative to McCain is the
Obama-lama-ding-dong it looks like we're going to be stuck with idiots
for a little bit longer.

Again, anyone care to list Obama's experience?


Just asking.


Snicker.

Emerson Wainwright

unread,
Sep 3, 2008, 9:46:46 PM9/3/08
to
On Sep 3, 9:03 pm, Harold Burton <hal.i.bur...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> In article
> <99212759-900a-450a-9c7d-75f97957c...@2g2000hsn.googlegroups.com>,

>  Emerson Wainwright <emersonwainwri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Sep 1, 12:36 pm, Steve Thomas <misledrks...@aol.com> wrote:
> > > On Sep 1, 11:28 pm, "MikeC" <n0b...@n0where.com> wrote:
>
> > > > "Emerson Wainwright" <emersonwainwri...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> > > >news:f2bf8244-b184-4fb1...@m73g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
>
> > > > > MCCAIN KNEW
>
> > > > > Senior McCain campaign officials said McCain knew of the daughter's
> > > > > pregnancy when he selected Palin last week as his vice presidential
> > > > > running mate, deciding that it did not disqualify the 44-year-old
> > > > > governor in any way.
>
> > > > Gotta agree with McCain here, this is a non-issue. There are plenty of
> > > > other
> > > > reasons to disqualify Palin.
>
> > > Like?
>
> > How about her pot smoking?
>
> Did she inhale?

Yes.

>  Well if she did, immediate disqualification

We're on the same page.

Sarah Palin is a bad mother. Her kids should be taken from her.

Cousin Purlean Huggins

unread,
Sep 3, 2008, 11:02:47 PM9/3/08
to
On Sep 3, 7:18�am, WBYe...@Ireland.com wrote:

> Fantasy and homophobia makes a true Christian.

The Bible is not a book of fantasy. True Christians are likewise not
afraid of homo-sexuals. We heal their spiritual afflictions by
casting out the demons that possess them.

> This leaves out most of the world.

The Bible says, "Many are called, but few are chosen" (Matthew 22:14).

> Where do little Christians come from?

Not from fornication, at least for the most part. That's sex outside
Holy Matrimony.

> Gee - I saw Elvis the other day.

Elvis Costello or Elvis Mitchell?

> There is no proof, none, nada that the man ever existed.

The Lord Jesus is no mere man. You are free to reject the plentiful
evidence of His brief life on earth if you so choose, but that will be
to your own detriment.

> You BELIEVE he

He

> existed.

I KNOW He exists here and now as well. I told you I've seen Him many
times.

> Archaeology has proven that there were a few historical events from
> the Old Testament which the Xtians

Christians, if you please.

> stole from the Jews who knew much of it was mythology and symbolism.

True Jews have always known the Holy Scriptures are reliable accounts
of actual events.

> Christians are more about the New Testament which has a lot of good stuff but
> very little in the way of history except that folks did return to their homes in 0 CE

There is no "0 CE". 1 BC was followed by AD 1 -- although neither
designation was used at the time, or for centuries afterward. The
ancient city of Nineveh was long thought to have been mythical, but
then archaeologists unearthed its ruins exactly where the Holy Bible
said it would be.

> to be taxed.

The New Testament also tells us about King Herod, Pontius Pilate, the
"Unknown God" of Athens, and the Silversmiths' Riot, among many other
historical truths.

> So you're a true Christian if you're against abortion?

Not necessarily -- but all True Christians are against abortion as a
primary means of birth control. Many non-Christians share the same
belief, actually.

> Sure thing. Abstinence makes the heart grow fonder - we've seen how well that
> works.

In our church it works fine. We admit that it's difficult to abstain
in a world saturated with pornographic images. That's why we burn
pornography at our churches every weekend.

> Ah - still in the literal stage of development, are you?

I prefer to call it the Biblically literate stage.

> WB Yeats
> Alive 'n Kickin'

Beware of imitators.

Cousin Purlean Huggins

unread,
Sep 3, 2008, 11:34:43 PM9/3/08
to
On Sep 3, 10:15�am, Bill Baker <wba...@postini.spamcon.org> wrote:

> Until she learns that presidents don't have the power to hand over the
> presidency to her church.

God sure does, though. Don't you think it's time for an absolute
monarchy in this country? I know I do. Queen Henrietta will rule
fairly and justly to establish her throne on these blessed shores.
Wouldn't you rather have an authentic Black Jewish queen in power than
a man with a mixed heritage?

> Maybe, but hopefully just token support, enough to keep the religious
> crazies happy.

We're hoping to convert all of them to True Christianity.

> I still haven't seen any proof that any of her children exist or that you're

> not all the creation of Max Varazslo. �

He's Jewish. Why would a Jew who's not even particularly religious
preach the Gospel to non-believers. Jews tend notto believe in
proselytizing anyway.

> Perhaps a scanned copy of the birth certificate would help convince me.

That's Cousin Lurlean's to share with you if she so chooses, not
mine. Why don't you send the baby a nice gift?

> So how did your brainwashing session with Thurgood go? �

Brother Thurgood doesn't believe in brainwashing. He took me aside
for special counseling at our Mount Golgotha Pain Center. After a few
hours of treatment I feel much stronger in the faith than ever
before. I still believe there's a lot more to homo-sexual attraction
than meets the eye, but it is a condition best eradicated by means of
faith healing and prayer. No one in our church hates homo-sexuals.
Cousin Lurlean and I both have several gay and lesbian friends.

> Are you back to worshiping Satan like he and his wife do?

None of us have ever worshiped Satan. Whatever gave you such an
absurd idea?

What are you going to do if John McCain is elected president?


I would pray for you, but I know it wouldn't do any good,

Furlean Ursula-Christine Kuntz, M.E. (cousin of Lurlean and Purlean)

unread,
Sep 4, 2008, 1:45:27 PM9/4/08
to
On Sep 3, 1:22 am, Cousin Purlean Huggins <purl...@wowmail.com> wrote:
> On Sep 1, 10:23 pm, Bill Baker <wba...@postini.spamcon.org> wrote:
>
> > Obama-sama? Does that mean you acknowledge him as a great person to be
> > referring to him with that Japanese honorific?
>
> I doubt that's what my baby cousin had in mind -- but who knows?
> Maybe she could grow to appreciate Senator Obama. Do you think he'll
> support any faith-based initiatives? Lurlean gave birth to a
> beautiful baby boy this afternoon. Sherwin Andrew Tucker was born at
> 2:13 PM Pacific Coast Time. Aren't you happy for the proud parents?

Hello Cousin Purlean!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I've finally found you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I am so happy for Lurlean!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I heard that the LABOR was EXCRUCIATING and that Lurlean needed some
MORPHINE and COCAINE to relieve her
PAIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Thank GOD for drugs!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

> He's got his daddy's eyes and his mama's mouth =-= sort of. Both
> mother and child are doing fine

Praise GOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

> -- even though little Sherwin was over
> a week late!

Why did they decide to name the baby after his BIOLOGICAL
father????????????????????????????????

> I'm sure Lurlean will be more calm when she comes back
> here to preach again soon. Right now we're all getting ready for
> little Sherwin's circumcision next week.
>
> Praise the Lord! Unto us a child is born!

HALLELUJAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Furlean Ursula-Christine Kuntz, M.E. (Meditation Expert)
Cousin to Lurlean and Purlean
First Of Our Family To Attend High School
First Of Our Family To Experience Pregnancy For The First Time AFTER
Marriage

Furlean Ursula-Christine Kuntz, M.E. (cousin of Lurlean and Purlean)

unread,
Sep 4, 2008, 1:48:20 PM9/4/08
to
On Sep 3, 1:35 am, Cousin Purlean Huggins <purl...@wowmail.com> wrote:

> marriage that God
> ordained in the Garden of Eden and that Jesus later blessed as the
> Sacred Union between one man and one woman.

That brings back GREAT MEMORIES, Cousin
Purlean!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Remember when we caught Cousin Lurlean out back in the GARDEN, playing
naked with that young boy and that one-eyed trouser
serpent???????????????????????????

OH LAWDIE, the things that 20-year-olds will
do!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Will send you info on our next FAMILY REUNION!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Sorry that neither of you has been invited ever!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

LOVE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Furlean Ursula-Christine Kuntz, M.E. (cousin of Lurlean and Purlean)

unread,
Sep 4, 2008, 1:49:45 PM9/4/08
to
On Sep 3, 1:46 am, Tuge Hits <tugeh...@yahoo.com> wrote:

That is a BEAUTIFUL name!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I haven't seen the baby yet!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! But they
named him after the BIOLOGICAL father, who I also have never
seen!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Not sure that Cousin Lurlean
actually saw him,
either!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

LOVE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Furlean Ursula-Christine Kuntz, M.E. (cousin of Lurlean and Purlean)

unread,
Sep 4, 2008, 1:51:37 PM9/4/08
to

She chewed gum LONG after that last hanger-on fell
out!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Sounded like a COW
chewing her CUD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

You seem like a nice
fella!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

LOVE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Dionisio

unread,
Sep 4, 2008, 8:54:23 PM9/4/08
to
Harold Burton wrote:

> Again, anyone care to list Obama's experience?

I hear tell that he's been a US Senator...


--
And the Thought of the Moment (TM) is:

Cremators make money the honest way: They urn it.

Harold Burton

unread,
Sep 4, 2008, 10:31:11 PM9/4/08
to
In article <2r%vk.80733$Ei2....@fe08.news.easynews.com>,
Dionisio <moc.rr.t...@5ellimd.com> wrote:

> Harold Burton wrote:
>
> > Again, anyone care to list Obama's experience?
>
> I hear tell that he's been a US Senator...

Where his toughest job is actually voting yea or nay, rather than
"present".


A president needs experience in actually running things, like a town or
a state, and the Obama-lama-ding-dong has ZERO experience in that.

ScottyFLL

unread,
Sep 4, 2008, 10:38:11 PM9/4/08
to
On Sep 4, 10:31 pm, Harold Burton <hal.i.bur...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> In article <2r%vk.80733$Ei2.58...@fe08.news.easynews.com>,

>
>  Dionisio <moc.rr.thighi...@5ellimd.com> wrote:
> > Harold Burton wrote:
>
> > > Again, anyone care to list Obama's experience?
>
> > I hear tell that he's been a US Senator...
>
> Where his toughest job is actually voting yea or nay, rather than
> "present".
>
> A president needs experience

Not according to the U.S. Constitution. Are you anti-America?

Cousin Purlean Huggins

unread,
Sep 5, 2008, 3:20:20 AM9/5/08
to
On Sep 4, 10:45�am, "Furlean Ursula-Christine Kuntz, M.E. (cousin of
Lurlean and Purlean)" <furleanku...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Hello Cousin Purlean!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

You've earned yourself an F in originality, Scott. Grow up already!


Here for your Spiritual emergency,

Guillaume Ier de Normandie

unread,
Sep 5, 2008, 2:13:57 PM9/5/08
to
On Sep 5, 3:20 am, Cousin Purlean Huggins <purl...@wowmail.com> wrote:
> On Sep 4, 10:45 am, "Furlean Ursula-Christine Kuntz, M.E. (cousin of
> Lurlean and Purlean)" <furleanku...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > Hello Cousin Purlean!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
> You've earned yourself an F in originality, Scott.  Grow up already!

Max, I am FAR too busy posting delicious information about Hootchie
Mama Book-Banning Pot-Smoking Secessionist Sarah Palin -- America's
Worst Mother -- to have devised this "Furlean" character, although I
think it's quite funny.

"Furlean". LOL!!

Cousin Purlean Huggins

unread,
Sep 5, 2008, 9:23:44 PM9/5/08
to
On Sep 5, 11:13�am, Guillaume Ier de Normandie
<guillaumedenorman...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Max,

I'm not Max. When you learn to address me appropriately, we can talk,
but not until.

> "Furlean". �LOL!!

I told the group about my cousin Furlean two years ago.


Here to help those who need it most,

ScottyFLL

unread,
Sep 5, 2008, 9:41:20 PM9/5/08
to
On Sep 5, 9:23 pm, Cousin Purlean Huggins <purl...@wowmail.com> wrote:
> On Sep 5, 11:13 am, Guillaume Ier de Normandie
>
> <guillaumedenorman...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > Max,
>
> I'm not Max.  When you learn to address me appropriately, we can talk,
> but not until.
>
> > "Furlean". LOL!!
>
> I told the group about my cousin Furlean two years ago.

I see.

And you don't really want them to know her.

Dionisio

unread,
Sep 5, 2008, 11:01:35 PM9/5/08
to
Harold Burton wrote:

> A president needs experience in actually running things, like a town or
> a state, and the Obama-lama-ding-dong has ZERO experience in that.

Oh... Wax prolific on McCain then...

<LOL>


--
And the Thought of the Moment (TM) is:

"How many seconds are there in a year? If I tell you there are 3.1536 x 10^7, you won't
even try to remember it. On the other hand, who could forget that, to within half a
percent, pi seconds is a nanocentury?"
-- Tom Duff, Bell Labs

(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) -- NO FACTS Support RRR Cult's Loathsome Agendas!

unread,
Sep 6, 2008, 9:09:03 AM9/6/08
to
On Fri, 5 Sep 2008 00:20:20 -0700 (PDT),
Cousin Purlean Huggins <pur...@wowmail.com>
(aka M-F <mother...@wowmail.com>)
<aka Max) wrote:


> The Truly IGNORANT Are Everywhere!

And you are living PROOF of that, Max.
Thanks for reminding us.


-- (¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯)

xana...@mchsi.com -- To E-Mail me.
http://www.roadrat.com -- Learn how to get PAID to TRAVEL.
http://apifar.blogspot.com -- Great TACTICS to Fight Bigotry.
http://pro-christian.blogspot.com -- Christianity *vs.* Bigotry.

Cousin Purlean Huggins

unread,
Sep 6, 2008, 1:04:03 PM9/6/08
to
On Sep 6, 6:09�am, "(�`�.�Craig Chilton�.���) -- NO FACTS Support RRR
Cult's Loathsome Agendas!" <xanadu2...@mchsi.com> wrote:

How can there be an RRR "cult" if we all enjoy the same freedom of
religion?

> (aka M-*

I'm not "aka" any such name. You are one confused dirty old man,
Craig. Time is short. I'd repent if I were you.

> <mother-f*****@wowmail.com>)

A dirty old man with the intellect of a horny 14-year-old.

> <aka Max)

I'm "aka" Max only to the very ignorant -- like you.

> � � � And you are living PROOF of that, Max. �

I'm not Max, but I don't mind pointing out your ignorance. Unlike
you, I'm entirely right with God and have nothing to fear on Judgment
Day. Your support for fornication, adultery, pornograpy, homo-
sexuality, and abortion will all count against you.

> � � � Thanks for reminding us.

God will punish you for insulting His people as well. As Jesus says,
"Blessed are ye, when men shall revile you, and persecute you, and
shall say all manner of evil against you falsely, for My sake.
Rejoice, and be exceeding glad: for great is your reward in heaven:
for so persecuted they the prophets which were before you" (Matthew
5:11-12).


Praying for sinners everywhere,

Bill Baker

unread,
Sep 8, 2008, 2:18:34 AM9/8/08
to
On Wednesday 03 September 2008 11:34 pm Cousin Purlean Huggins
<pur...@wowmail.com> wrote in message
news:<e8eb3cf9-5a5d-48dc...@i24g2000prf.googlegroups.com>...

> On Sep 3, 10:15am, Bill Baker <wba...@postini.spamcon.org> wrote:
>
>> Until she learns that presidents don't have the power to hand over the
>> presidency to her church.
>
> God sure does, though.

Nope. Otherwise it would have happened by now.

> Don't you think it's time for an absolute monarchy in this country?

No, I think it's time for a true secular republic where church is as far
divorced from state as the east is from the west.

> I know I do. Queen Henrietta will rule fairly and justly to establish her
> throne on these blessed shores. Wouldn't you rather have an authentic
> Black Jewish queen in power than a man with a mixed heritage?

Are you racist against mixed race people? What makes you think that just
because of someone's skin color or heritage they would make a better ruler?
You're worse than a white supremacist.

>> Maybe, but hopefully just token support, enough to keep the religious
>> crazies happy.
>
> We're hoping to convert all of them to True Christianity.

I'll tell you right now it's not going to happen.

>> I still haven't seen any proof that any of her children exist or that
>> you're not all the creation of Max Varazslo.
>
> He's Jewish. Why would a Jew who's not even particularly religious
> preach the Gospel to non-believers. Jews tend notto believe in
> proselytizing anyway.

That still isn't proof that any of her children exist or that you're not all


the creation of Max Varazslo.

>> Perhaps a scanned copy of the birth certificate would help convince me.


>
> That's Cousin Lurlean's to share with you if she so chooses, not
> mine. Why don't you send the baby a nice gift?

Because I have no proof that it exists.

>> So how did your brainwashing session with Thurgood go?
>
> Brother Thurgood doesn't believe in brainwashing.

He doesn't have to in order to use it. It still works regardless.

> He took me aside for special counseling at our Mount Golgotha Pain Center.
> After a few hours of treatment I feel much stronger in the faith than ever
> before.

That's what usually happens after brainwashing.

> I still believe there's a lot more to homo-sexual attraction
> than meets the eye, but it is a condition best eradicated by means of
> faith healing and prayer. No one in our church hates homo-sexuals.
> Cousin Lurlean and I both have several gay and lesbian friends.

Yes, the old "some of my best friends..." line.

>> Are you back to worshiping Satan like he and his wife do?
>
> None of us have ever worshiped Satan. Whatever gave you such an
> absurd idea?

The words you preach against God's homosexual children are proof that you
and they worship Satan.

> What are you going to do if John McCain is elected president?

Look into getting a job in Canada. If I'm successful, I'll move there and
renounce my U.S. citizenship. Unfortunately, I may have a lot of
competition with there likely being such a mass exodus northward if that
happens. If McCain is elected, that is just proof that we're heading
toward the society depicted in Mike Judge's 2006 film, "Idiocracy."

> I would pray for you, but I know it wouldn't do any good,

That's okay, I don't need any of Satan's help.

> Cousin Purlean Huggins
> Your Heavenly Connection

--
Bushism 4-4:
"[A] free Iraq is essential to our respective securities."
--Washington, D.C.; June 1, 2004

Cousin Purlean Huggins

unread,
Sep 8, 2008, 9:06:28 PM9/8/08
to

Cousin Purlean Huggins

unread,
Sep 8, 2008, 9:32:57 PM9/8/08
to
On Sep 7, 11:18�pm, Bill Baker <wba...@postini.spamcon.org> wrote:

> Nope. �Otherwise it would have happened by now.

God always waits till the time is absolutely right. He obviously
wants this country to stew in its own juices a little while longer
before He puts a Holy Messianic Queen on the throne and abolishes
willy-nilly democracy once and for all. Don't you think we're headed
for a cave-in as it is with all the debt the current administration
has racked up? The only reliable solution is Theocracy. Barack Obama
won't be able to keep any of the promises he's been making.

> No, I think it's time for a true secular republic where church is as far
> divorced from state as the east is from the west.

East and west co-exist at every point on the globe. Any state that
isn't guided by the True Church is bound to fail. Our Church is ready
to meet the challenge. We want to take over the government and rule
fairly for a change. Imagine a country with no more poverty, no more
famine, no more crime, no more addiction, no more war, no more
terrorism, no more pornography -- and no more homo-sexuality That
will almost be paradise.

> Are you racist against mixed race people? �

Not at all. What I'm for are stable marriages. Barack Obama's
mother's marriages were not stable. I oppose interfaith marriages
more than I do interracial ones.

> What makes you think that just because of someone's skin color or heritage
> they would make a better ruler?

When did I say anything about anyone's skin color? Holy Queen
Henrietta is much Blacker than Barack Obama. She is also true to her
Black Jewish heritage. Americans can't decide whether Obama is a
Christian, a Muslim, or something in between.

> You're worse than a white supremacist.

I hardly think so. Holy Queen Henrietta is descended from the kings
and queens of Imperial Judah. Barack Obama springs from much more
common stock.

> I'll tell you right now it's not going to happen.

We'll reach even more sinners through televangelism. Wouldn't you
like to see Father and Mother Tucker perform exorcisms on TV?
Wouldn't you like to be their special guest? Please send money to
make it all happen!

> That still isn't proof that any of her children exist or that you're not all
> the creation of Max Varazslo.

But he's Jewish! Why would a Jew preach True Christainity to
skeptics?

> Because I have no proof that it exists.

God wants you to have faith. God also wants you to send money. How
much can we put you down for this month?

> He doesn't have to in order to use it. �It still works regardless.

He doesn't practice brainwashing. He's a faith healer. Our Pain
Center specializes in spiritual realignment, not brainwashing.

> That's what usually happens after brainwashing.

I wasn't brainwashed. I was bound and gagged and subjected to light
electrical shocks as Father Tucker read from the Holy Scriptures. He
purged me of all doubt. Imagine what his rack could do for your
skeptical attitude. .

> Yes, the old "some of my best friends..." line.

I never said any of our "best" friends were homo-sexuals. If you let
them get that close to you with all their diseases, they might easily
contaminate something.

> The words you preach against God's homosexual children are proof that you
> and they worship Satan.

All practicing homo-sexuals are strangers to the Lord. Their
unnatural lusts keep them far from His Holy Throne and His blessings.

> Look into getting a job in Canada. �If I'm successful, I'll move there and

> renounce my U.S. citizenship. �

Don't you think that's a little drastic? Surely John McCain isn't
worse than George W. Bush.

> Unfortunately, I may have a lot of
> competition with there likely being such a mass exodus northward if that
> happens. �If McCain is elected, that is just proof that we're heading
> toward the society depicted in Mike Judge's 2006 film, "Idiocracy."

The cure for "idiocracy" is a True Christian Theocracy firmly based on
the Holy Bible.

> That's okay, I don't need any of Satan's help.

I would never pray to Satan. I wish you'd stop lying about True
Christians like us.

Bill Baker

unread,
Sep 9, 2008, 1:09:39 PM9/9/08
to
On Monday 08 September 2008 09:32 pm Cousin Purlean Huggins
<pur...@wowmail.com> wrote in message
news:<7335d701-db1f-4323...@x16g2000prn.googlegroups.com>...

> On Sep 7, 11:18pm, Bill Baker <wba...@postini.spamcon.org> wrote:
>
>> Nope. Otherwise it would have happened by now.
>
> God always waits till the time is absolutely right.

Typical excuse. If your god Satan was really all that omnipotent, he'd be
able to make the time right.

> He obviously wants this country to stew in its own juices a little while
> longer before He puts a Holy Messianic Queen on the throne and abolishes
> willy-nilly democracy once and for all. Don't you think we're headed
> for a cave-in as it is with all the debt the current administration
> has racked up? The only reliable solution is Theocracy. Barack Obama
> won't be able to keep any of the promises he's been making.

Maybe not, but theocracy will only make it worse.

>> No, I think it's time for a true secular republic where church is as far
>> divorced from state as the east is from the west.
>
> East and west co-exist at every point on the globe.

I don't mean on the globe. I mean in a straight line. Meaning an infinite
distance apart.

> Any state that isn't guided by the True Church is bound to fail. Our
> Church is ready to meet the challenge. We want to take over the
> government and rule fairly for a change. Imagine a country with no more
> poverty, no more famine, no more crime, no more addiction, no more war, no
> more terrorism, no more pornography -- and no more homo-sexuality That
> will almost be paradise.

...for the rulers, that is. For everyone else it would be hell on earth.

>> Are you racist against mixed race people?
>
> Not at all. What I'm for are stable marriages. Barack Obama's
> mother's marriages were not stable. I oppose interfaith marriages
> more than I do interracial ones.

Then why did you use the words "authentic Black Jewish queen"?

>> What makes you think that just because of someone's skin color or
>> heritage they would make a better ruler?
>
> When did I say anything about anyone's skin color?

You said, "authentic Black Jewish queen". If black isn't a skin color, what
is it?

> Holy Queen Henrietta is much Blacker than Barack Obama.

So what?

> She is also true to her Black Jewish heritage. Americans can't decide
> whether Obama is a Christian, a Muslim, or something in between.

A person's religion shouldn't matter, since the U.S. is a secular republic.

>> You're worse than a white supremacist.
>
> I hardly think so. Holy Queen Henrietta is descended from the kings
> and queens of Imperial Judah. Barack Obama springs from much more
> common stock.

See? You're worse than a white supremacist.

>> I'll tell you right now it's not going to happen.
>
> We'll reach even more sinners through televangelism.

You mean like the televangelists that have had so much success up until now?

> Wouldn't you like to see Father and Mother Tucker perform exorcisms on TV?

Sure, I could use a good laugh.

> Wouldn't you like to be their special guest? Please send money to
> make it all happen!

Why don't they just pitch their idea to the head of Comedy Central? Then
the money will start rolling in.

>> That still isn't proof that any of her children exist or that you're not
>> all the creation of Max Varazslo.
>
> But he's Jewish! Why would a Jew preach True Christainity to
> skeptics?

For shits and giggles?

>> Because I have no proof that it exists.
>
> God wants you to have faith.

Prove it.

> God also wants you to send money. How much can we put you down for this
> month?

Put me down for as much as you like, but you won't be getting any of it.

>> He doesn't have to in order to use it. It still works regardless.
>
> He doesn't practice brainwashing. He's a faith healer. Our Pain
> Center specializes in spiritual realignment, not brainwashing.

They are all the same thing.

>> That's what usually happens after brainwashing.
>
> I wasn't brainwashed.

That's what all people who were brainwashed say.

> I was bound and gagged and subjected to light electrical shocks as Father
> Tucker read from the Holy Scriptures.

Sounds more like BDSM to me.

> He purged me of all doubt. Imagine what his rack could do for your
> skeptical attitude. .

Absolutely nothing.

>> Yes, the old "some of my best friends..." line.
>
> I never said any of our "best" friends were homo-sexuals. If you let
> them get that close to you with all their diseases, they might easily
> contaminate something.

See what I mean? Your church preaches hatred of homosexuals.

>> The words you preach against God's homosexual children are proof that you
>> and they worship Satan.
>
> All practicing homo-sexuals are strangers to the Lord. Their
> unnatural lusts keep them far from His Holy Throne and His blessings.

That's just Satan talking through you.

>> Look into getting a job in Canada. If I'm successful, I'll move there
>> and renounce my U.S. citizenship.
>
> Don't you think that's a little drastic? Surely John McCain isn't
> worse than George W. Bush.

Sure he is. He's irrational and unpredictable. Just look at his VP pick.
Those are not good qualities you want to see in a president.

>> Unfortunately, I may have a lot of
>> competition with there likely being such a mass exodus northward if that
>> happens. If McCain is elected, that is just proof that we're heading
>> toward the society depicted in Mike Judge's 2006 film, "Idiocracy."
>
> The cure for "idiocracy" is a True Christian Theocracy firmly based on
> the Holy Bible.

No, that would be even worse.

>> That's okay, I don't need any of Satan's help.
>
> I would never pray to Satan. I wish you'd stop lying about True
> Christians like us.

For not praying to Satan, you sure do speak his words.

--
<Kazz> Do vampires have anuses? Cause that's why I wouldn't let this kid
invade a vampire's anus in this RPG, right, I was GMing, and his character
was an Anus Shade, with the power to possess and control the anuses of
people and animals.. and I figured that vampires don't have anuses.
<Zaratustra> a vampire's anus is present, but non-working.
<Zaratustra> like a network card without the appropriate driver.
<Kazz> Wow. You're the biggest dork on Earth.
<Sharkey> And you're DMing an rpg with Anus Shades.

Cousin Purlean Huggins

unread,
Sep 9, 2008, 10:27:16 PM9/9/08
to
On Sep 9, 10:09�am, Bill Baker <wba...@postini.spamcon.org> wrote:

> Typical excuse. �

It's not an excuse at all. It's what the Bible says. "The Lord is
not slack concerning His promise, as some men count slackness; but is
longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that
all should come to repentance" (II Peter 3:9). Blasphemers are
excluded, naturally. Very shortly the time will be right again for a
Holy Theocracy in this once-decent nation. The decline began when the
Supreme Court took prayer and Bible reading out of the public
schools. In the coming Queendom there will be a mandatory HOUR of
prayer and Bible study every morning at every educational institution.

> If your god Satan

Satan is NOT a god. I walk with the Lord Jesus Christ! Satanists
attend black masses and orgies. I wouldn't dream of committing such
sins.

> was really all that omnipotent,

Almighty God is omnipotent. There are no degrees of omnipotence.

> he'd be able to make the time right.

He wants to give sinners more time to repent. Whenever I preach the
gospel, that's exactly what happens.

> Maybe not, but theocracy will only make it worse.

How so? Our Holy Black Queen will account directly to Almighty God.
I think it's possible that George W. Bush made a pact with the devil.

> I don't mean on the globe. �I mean in a straight line. �

Our Church takes wiggly lines and makes them straight. Why don't you
sign up for a few treatments?

> Meaning an infinite distance apart.

Without the Church to guide it, the state will quickly become
corrupt. Look at any communist country.

> ...for the rulers, that is. �For everyone else it would be hell on earth.

Do you use pornography? If not, why not help us abolish it? Homo-
sexuality is contrary to nature. Why shouldn't we eradicate it to
please God? He is truly offended by the sight of a homo-sexual couple
carrying on like a normal married couple.

> Then why did you use the words "authentic Black Jewish queen"?

Queen Henrietta is one of the original Black Jews of the Bible. The
white Jews came later. Her Majesty's Royal Family managed to resist
intermarriage throughout the centuries.

> You said, "authentic Black Jewish queen". �If black isn't a skin color, what
> is it?

I was just pointing out that she is a member of the Holy Tribe of
Judah that sojourned in Mother Egypt during the days of the kindly
Black Pharaohs. Her lineage is pure. It stretches all the way back
to Father Abraham, who was also a Black Jew.

> So what?

Her genes are unadulterated. She is fit to rule from the Holy Throne
of Judah.

> A person's religion shouldn't matter, since the U.S. is a secular republic.

That will change quickly. Religion always matters. Do you agree with
the Reverend Jeremiah Wright? Senator Obama did up to a point.

> See? �You're worse than a white supremacist.

Not at all! It's a question of breeding, not race. Senator Obama has
shallow roots that span several continents. Our Holy Blak Queen is
descended from King Solomon and is related to the Lord Jesus Christ.
How can you possibly oppose her holy reign? Jesus will be our King,
and she will be our queen.

> You mean like the televangelists that have had so much success up until now?

Not like the greedy ones, no. I was thinking of Kathryn Kuhlman. Our
show will have real faith healing.

> Sure, I could use a good laugh.

You're not supposed to laugh at serious things! You're supposed to
sing along and send in money.
.


> Why don't they just pitch their idea to the head of Comedy Central? �Then
> the money will start rolling in.

They aren't doing a comedy act. They're saving souls from eternal
damnation.

> For sh*ts

Do you mind? There's a lady present.

> and giggles?

We're preaching the True Gospel that leads to eternal life. There's
nothing funny about that. Some people are just so wicked they'll
laugh at anything.

> Prove it.

The Bible says so. "Blessed are they that have not seen, and yet have
believed" (John 20:29). If I say something, you can believe it. Like
other members of our church, I speak directly for the Lord Jesus
Christ.

> Put me down for as much as you like, but you won't be getting any of it.

Why not? Don't you think you owe it to God and His Most Faithful
Servants (us)?

> They are all the same thing.

That's not true. Don't knock our Pain Center till you've visited it.
I can promise it will bring out something precious in you -- True
Faith. You'll still go to hell, but you'll go believing and not
doubting. That's a small advantage, don't you think?

> That's what all people who were brainwashed say.

In my case it's true. I was simply liberated from all doubt.

> Sounds more like BDSM to me.

It sounds like you've got a dirty mind.

> Absolutely nothing.

Why not find out for sure before you dismiss it so casually? Have you
ever tried waterboarding?

> See what I mean? �Your church preaches hatred of homosexuals.

It does not! Can't you like someone and still want them to remain at
a respectable distance rom you? A lot of homo-sexuals have lice.
When anyone has dozens of sexual partners, they're bound to pick up
something.

> That's just Satan talking through you.

No. That's Divine inspiration. Homo-sexuals carry a lot of diseases.

> Sure he is. �He's irrational and unpredictable. �Just look at his VP pick.

I'd frankly rather not. I think it's good that her church has a homo-
sexual outreach.

> Those are not good qualities you want to see in a president.

I don't even want to see a president. I want to see kings and queens
in power in this country.

> No, that would be even worse.

How could it be worse if everyone follows the Golden Rule?

> For not praying to Satan, you sure do speak his words.

You're just confused. Have you had a coffee enema lately?


Jesus saves, heals, amd transforms,


Cousin Purean Huggins
Your Heaven;y Connection

Bill Baker

unread,
Sep 11, 2008, 2:33:35 PM9/11/08
to
On Tuesday 09 September 2008 10:27 pm Cousin Purlean Huggins
<pur...@wowmail.com> wrote in message
news:<1b31cc1b-7ac4-4e3a...@v13g2000pro.googlegroups.com>...

> On Sep 9, 10:09am, Bill Baker <wba...@postini.spamcon.org> wrote:
>
>> Typical excuse.
>
> It's not an excuse at all. It's what the Bible says. "The Lord is
> not slack concerning His promise, as some men count slackness; but is
> longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that
> all should come to repentance" (II Peter 3:9).

Of course it's an excuse. Just because the Bible makes the same excuse
doesn't make it less of one.

> Blasphemers are excluded, naturally. Very shortly the time will be right
> again for a Holy Theocracy in this once-decent nation. The decline began
> when the Supreme Court took prayer and Bible reading out of the public
> schools. In the coming Queendom there will be a mandatory HOUR of
> prayer and Bible study every morning at every educational institution.

And then our country will slide down into the hellhole that every single
theocracy has gone into.

>> If your god Satan
>
> Satan is NOT a god. I walk with the Lord Jesus Christ! Satanists
> attend black masses and orgies. I wouldn't dream of committing such
> sins.

Those are just people who say they worship Satan for the shock value. You
people who claim you're "True Christians" are the real Satanists.

>> was really all that omnipotent,
>
> Almighty God is omnipotent. There are no degrees of omnipotence.

Then why do you continually try to limit God's omnipotence?

>> he'd be able to make the time right.
>
> He wants to give sinners more time to repent. Whenever I preach the
> gospel, that's exactly what happens.

If he wanted sinners to repent, he'd just show himself and tell everyone to
repent. If he has to hide behind ineffective preachers like you, then why
worship him as if he were a god? I agree, Satan is not a god, but you sure
worship him like he is one.

>> Maybe not, but theocracy will only make it worse.
>
> How so? Our Holy Black Queen will account directly to Almighty God.

That's how so. Anyone who rules claiming a direct line to God makes
everyone else's life a living hell.

> I think it's possible that George W. Bush made a pact with the devil.

He did choose him to be vice president.

>> I don't mean on the globe. I mean in a straight line.
>
> Our Church takes wiggly lines and makes them straight. Why don't you
> sign up for a few treatments?

I like wiggly lines. Why don't you? If they're all straight, the world
would be very boring.

>> Meaning an infinite distance apart.
>
> Without the Church to guide it, the state will quickly become
> corrupt. Look at any communist country.

Look at every country that has tried theocracy. Given the choice between a
theocratic nation and a communist nation, I'll pick the communist nation
every time.

>> ...for the rulers, that is. For everyone else it would be hell on earth.
>
> Do you use pornography? If not, why not help us abolish it? Homo-
> sexuality is contrary to nature. Why shouldn't we eradicate it to
> please God?

Because you can't prove that God doesn't like homosexuality. All you can do
is tell people what Satan has told you God says.

> He is truly offended by the sight of a homo-sexual couple carrying on like
> a normal married couple.

God is offended by love? More proof that you worship Satan.

>> Then why did you use the words "authentic Black Jewish queen"?
>
> Queen Henrietta is one of the original Black Jews of the Bible. The
> white Jews came later. Her Majesty's Royal Family managed to resist
> intermarriage throughout the centuries.

See? You're racist against mixed-race people.

>> You said, "authentic Black Jewish queen". If black isn't a skin color,
>> what is it?
>
> I was just pointing out that she is a member of the Holy Tribe of
> Judah that sojourned in Mother Egypt during the days of the kindly
> Black Pharaohs. Her lineage is pure. It stretches all the way back
> to Father Abraham, who was also a Black Jew.

"Pure" just like the Aryan race was pure, huh?

>> So what?
>
> Her genes are unadulterated. She is fit to rule from the Holy Throne
> of Judah.

You're a racist.

>> A person's religion shouldn't matter, since the U.S. is a secular
>> republic.
>
> That will change quickly. Religion always matters. Do you agree with
> the Reverend Jeremiah Wright? Senator Obama did up to a point.

To a point, yes. But neither his views nor any other preacher's views
should be used to run this country.

>> See? You're worse than a white supremacist.
>
> Not at all! It's a question of breeding, not race.

That's what makes you worse than a white supremacist.

> Senator Obama has shallow roots that span several continents. Our Holy
> Blak Queen is descended from King Solomon and is related to the Lord Jesus
> Christ. How can you possibly oppose her holy reign? Jesus will be our
> King, and she will be our queen.

I oppose any plan made by Satan, that's how.

>> You mean like the televangelists that have had so much success up until
>> now?
>
> Not like the greedy ones, no. I was thinking of Kathryn Kuhlman. Our
> show will have real faith healing.

That ought to be good for a laugh.

>> Sure, I could use a good laugh.
>
> You're not supposed to laugh at serious things! You're supposed to
> sing along and send in money.

If I'm not supposed to laugh at serious things, I can definitely laugh at
their "faith healing."

>> Why don't they just pitch their idea to the head of Comedy Central? Then
>> the money will start rolling in.
>
> They aren't doing a comedy act. They're saving souls from eternal
> damnation.

They could at least go on The Gong Show.

>> For sh*ts
>
> Do you mind? There's a lady present.

Where?

>> and giggles?
>
> We're preaching the True Gospel that leads to eternal life. There's
> nothing funny about that. Some people are just so wicked they'll
> laugh at anything.

I'm sure that's what Satan tells you when you pray to him.

>> Prove it.
>
> The Bible says so.

That's not proof. Anyone can write a book that says anything.

> "Blessed are they that have not seen, and yet have believed" (John 20:29).
> If I say something, you can believe it. Like other members of our church,
> I speak directly for the Lord Jesus Christ.

Prove it.

>> Put me down for as much as you like, but you won't be getting any of it.
>
> Why not? Don't you think you owe it to God and His Most Faithful
> Servants (us)?

No, I don't give to Satan worshipers.

>> They are all the same thing.
>
> That's not true.

Of course it is.

> Don't knock our Pain Center till you've visited it. I can promise it will
> bring out something precious in you -- True Faith. You'll still go to
> hell, but you'll go believing and not doubting. That's a small advantage,
> don't you think?

Why would that be?

>> That's what all people who were brainwashed say.
>
> In my case it's true. I was simply liberated from all doubt.

It's true that you were brainwashed, that is.

>> Sounds more like BDSM to me.
>
> It sounds like you've got a dirty mind.

I'm not the one who brought your sick sexual fantasies into the
conversation.

>> Absolutely nothing.
>
> Why not find out for sure before you dismiss it so casually?

Because you may be able to force me to say something through torture, but
you can't make me believe it.

> Have you ever tried waterboarding?

No, I don't live near the ocean and I don't own a board.

>> See what I mean? Your church preaches hatred of homosexuals.
>
> It does not!

You can deny all you want, but your own words say otherwise.

> Can't you like someone and still want them to remain at a respectable
> distance rom you?

You mean like when black people had separate water fountains and had to sit
at the back of the bus?

> A lot of homo-sexuals have lice. When anyone has dozens of sexual
> partners, they're bound to pick up something.

That goes for straight people, too.

>> That's just Satan talking through you.
>
> No. That's Divine inspiration. Homo-sexuals carry a lot of diseases.

Only if you call Satan "Divine."

>> Sure he is. He's irrational and unpredictable. Just look at his VP
>> pick.
>
> I'd frankly rather not. I think it's good that her church has a homo-
> sexual outreach.

Yes, it figures that you Satan worshipers would stick together.

>> Those are not good qualities you want to see in a president.
>
> I don't even want to see a president. I want to see kings and queens
> in power in this country.

I'd rather see this be a good country.

>> No, that would be even worse.
>
> How could it be worse if everyone follows the Golden Rule?

Because everyone won't, no matter how hard you try to make them.

>> For not praying to Satan, you sure do speak his words.
>
> You're just confused. Have you had a coffee enema lately?

Typical excuse, calling me confused because I tell the truth about your
Satan worship.

> Jesus saves, heals, amd transforms,

...you into a Satan-worshiper, if we go by your example.

> Cousin Purean Huggins
> Your Heaven;y Connection

--
<VolteFace`> don't you hate it when you shit on the floor, and you can hear
it fall but you have no idea where it actually landed, and spend like 5
minutes looking for it
<peng> ...
<peng> what?
<VolteFace`> oh shit
<VolteFace`> don't you hate it when you DROP shit

juanjo

unread,
Sep 11, 2008, 3:35:07 PM9/11/08
to
On Sep 9, 7:27 pm, Cousin Purlean Huggins <purl...@wowmail.com> a well

know alter ego to a wanna be funny boy named Max wrote:


> We're preaching the True Gospel that leads to eternal life.  

Assuming for a moment you were actually a woman which of course you
are not, then your very presence here is affront to the "True Gospel"
which strictly prohibits women from engaging in such "evangelical"
activities. As a result, one can safely conclude you are in fact a
Tool of the Devil sent here to deceive unbelievers by making the Lord
God Jehovah look absurd through your prattling nonsense and thereby
encourage sinners to continue on the folly until the final trumpet
sounds thus sending them into the abyss with you.

Since in fact you are a man pretending to be a women the situation is
even worse. This makes you a transsexual wannabe, a pervert according
to the Holy Writ of Christendom. Your very presence here is affront
to Jesus Christ and is even further indication that you are in fact a
Tool of the Devil sent here to deceive unbelievers by making the Lord
God Jehovah look absurd through your prattling nonsense and thereby
encourage sinners to continue on the folly until the final trumpet
sounds thus sending them into the abyss with you.

So no matter how one looks at the issue, your posts here are an
affront of Lord God Jehovah who does not take kindly on those who mock
Him or His Works. You do so at your peril. It is clear that you are
a Tool of Satan sent here to deceive unbelievers by making the Lord
God Jehovah look absurd through your prattling nonsense and thereby
encourage sinners to continue on the folly until the final trumpet
sounds thus sending them into the abyss with you.

Get thee behind me Satan, back to the Pit with you!

Cousin Purlean Huggins

unread,
Sep 11, 2008, 10:06:34 PM9/11/08
to
On Sep 11, 11:33�am, Bill Baker <wba...@postini.spamcon.org> wrote:

> Of course it's an excuse. �

No, it's not. God means everything He says. There would be even more
billions in hell if the Lord Jesus's Second Coming hadn't been
deliberately delayed by God the Father. Believe me, you don't want
doomsday to come. Blasphemers of the Holy Spirit are going straight
to the devil's lair.

> Just because the Bible makes the same excuse

The Holy Bible absolutely never makes excuses of any kind.

> doesn't make it less of one.

You've fallen for another of Satan's many lies. He's got you totally
confused. Have you seen a specialist about those electrodes in your
rectum?

> And then our country will slide down into the hellhole that every single
> theocracy has gone into.

There have been very few real theocracies in history. Which one do
you have in mind when you make such a preposterous claim?

> Those are just people who say they worship Satan for the shock value. �

That isn't the way they see it. The devil is pleased that they're
doing his evil work.

> You people who claim you're "True Christians" are the real Satanists.

The devil told you that lie and you believe it!

> Then why do you continually try to limit God's omnipotence?

I don't. Why should He save a blaspheming wretch like you?

> If he

He

> wanted sinners to repent, he'd

He'd

> just show himself

Himself

> and tell everyone to repent. �

God doesn't work that way. How little you know about reality!

> If he

He

> has to hide

He doesn't hide. He simply doesn't reveal His Glory to the unworthy.

> behind ineffective preachers like you,

My preaching is highly effective. At my church I rarely focus on the
homo-sexuality issue. With Dr. Tucker's help, that will be changing
soon. It's possible that our choir was successfully infiltrated.
We're going to conduct a thorough witch hunt to find out.

> then why worship him

Him

> as if he

He

> were a god? �

Jesus is Our True Lord. You are simply a stranger to Him.

> I agree, Satan is not a god, but you sure
> worship him like he is one.

I have NEVER worshiped Satan. You're seriously confused. When's the
last time you had an enema?

> That's how so. �Anyone who rules claiming a direct line to God makes
> everyone else's life a living hell.

Only those of you who are already destined for hell will feel that
way. A Holy Theocracy will bring True Liberation to those who are
persecuted for their religious beliefs, as we are now. True Believers
-- Christians, Jews, Buddhists, Confucianists, Baha'is, Jains, Sikhs
and others -- will join hands in brotherhood. Who doesn't want less
crime, less poverty, less hungry, less disease, less drug addiction,
less loneliness, less pornography, less prostitution, and less sexual
deviancy? True Christian Theocracy will put an end to the suffering
of the righteous.

> He did choose him to be vice president.

Dick Cheney isn't the devil, but he is a wicked man. That's why God
cursed his family with the blight of homo-sexuality. An otherwise
very religious woman told me today that what Bill Clinton did with
Monica Lewinsky, a white Jew, wasn't as horrible as our church teaches
it is. She says men in power do such things regularly. Do you
agree? Do you think Senator Obama should have chosen Hillary Clinton
as his vice president?

> I like wiggly lines. �

That figures. You probably lead a wiggly lifestyle as well.

> Why don't you? �

Everything in its place.

> If they're all straight, the world would be very boring.

God wants people to be straight. Only those who love the devil and
choose to rebel against God are bored with the straight lifestyle.

> Look at every country that has tried theocracy. �Given the choice between a
> theocratic nation and a communist nation, I'll pick the communist nation
> every time.

You're welcome to defect to China once our Holy Black Queen takes
over. All your personal property must remain here, however.

> Because you can't prove that God doesn't like homosexuality. �

He tells those closest to Him that whenever He's asked.

> All you can do is tell people what Satan has told you God says.

No. We speak on God's behalf. God protects us from all Satanic
influence.

> God is offended by love? �

No -- but you know homo-sexuals can't feel love. They stew in their
own animal lusts for fresh young flesh. They are sexual predators and
God definitely hates what they do with their bodies.

> More proof that you worship Satan.

No. That's proof that I serve the One True Lord. You never met the
real Jesus Christ, I'm sorry to say.

> See? �You're racist against mixed-race people.

No, I'm not. I just don't believe most of them are fit to rule.

> "Pure" just like the Aryan race was pure, huh?

No. There is no Aryan race, pure or otherwise.

> You're a racist.

They say that about all Zionists. God promised the descendants of
Judah a throne. Holy queen Henrietta belongs on it!

> To a point, yes. �But neither his views nor any other preacher's views
> should be used to run this country.

Our Holy Black Queen is a prophet, not just a preacher. She is
destined to rule over all of us. You'll either have Theocracy or
corruption.

> That's what makes you worse than a white supremacist.

Face it. Barack Obama comes from bad seed, not from any royal blood.
Holy Queen Henrietta is a distant cousin of the Lord Jesus. How can
we go wrong with Her Highness on the Throne of Judah?

> I oppose any plan made by Satan, that's how.

George W. Bush is Satan's pawn. Satan doesn't want Holy Theocracy
either.

> That ought to be good for a laugh.

Why laugh at something that sincerely helps people? So many doctors
only get people addicted to drugs. Faith healers like us can heal the
sick and raise the dead.

> If I'm not supposed to laugh at serious things, I can definitely laugh at
> their "faith healing."

How so? Faith healing banishes disease. The Bible states quite
clearly that diseases are caused by demons. We cast demons out and
bring Gospel sunshine in to replace it.

> They could at least go on The Gong Show.

Do the producers use a collection plate?

> Where?

Right here. I'm a lady. I'm may be the only real lady you'll ever
encounter.

> I'm sure that's what Satan tells you when you pray to him.

I don't pray to Satan. He never gets near enough to me to influence
my behavior in any way.

> That's not proof. �Anyone can write a book that says anything.

But God inspired every word of the Holy Bible. You'll be judged by
it!

> Prove it.

Just believe it. Only simpletons ask for proof.

> No, I don't give to Satan worshipers.

Then you should send all your extra money to us. We're True Christian
Bible believers.

> Of course it is.

No. They're totally different -- even if the ignorant can't tell them
apart.

> Why would that be?

Suffering brings us closer to God. In your case it can decrease your
agonies in the afterlife.

> It's true that you were brainwashed, that is.

No! It's true that I was liberated from all doubt. Now I can feel
God's Truth within me.

> I'm not the one who brought your sick sexual fantasies into the
> conversation.

When did I say anything about sexual fantasies, sick or otherwise?

> Because you may be able to force me to say something through torture, but
> you can't make me believe it.

Never underestimate the effectiveness of electroshock therapy.

> No, I don't live near the ocean and I don't own a board.

I mean the kind of friendly persuasion our troops in Iraq use on
terrorists.

> You can deny all you want, but your own words say otherwise.

I have NEVER preached hate against homo-sexuals! I pity the
disgusting disease-infected cretins!

> You mean like when black people had separate water fountains and had to sit
> at the back of the bus?

Not exactly. I don't mind sharing water fountains or bus seats with
homo-sexuals as long as they agree not to touch me or allow any of
their bodily fluids to come into contact with anything of mine.
That's only because the typical male homo-sexual carries several
contagious diseases.

> That goes for straight people, too.

Hypothetically, yes -- but very few of us have as many sex partners as
the average "gay" man. I've known homo-sexuals who camp out in public
parks and perform oral sex on twenty to forty men in a single day.

> Only if you call Satan "Divine."

No. The inspiration comes from Almighty God. You really are in deep
denial, aren't you? Do you have herpes?

> Yes, it figures that you Satan worshipers would stick together.

Satan wants to spread homo-sexuality. The People of God want to cure
it.

> I'd rather see this be a good country.

It will be good ONLY if it's ruled by Divinely anointed Black Jewish
kings and queen. Prince Cornelius Caesar is next in line after Crown
Princess Keesha.

> Because everyone won't, no matter how hard you try to make them.

What about all the public scourgings, floggings, and dunkings? Surely
they will deter evil.

> Typical excuse, calling me confused because I tell the truth about your
> Satan worship.

That's not the truth! It's another of Lucifer's lies! You are so
confused you don't know your rectum from Satan's rumpus room.

> ...you into a Satan-worshiper, if we go by your example.

No -- sinners into saints!

Bill Baker

unread,
Sep 12, 2008, 5:40:58 AM9/12/08
to
On Thursday September 11 2008 22:06, Cousin Purlean Huggins
<pur...@wowmail.com> wrote in message
news:<f5f324d8-4cdc-483e...@w1g2000prk.googlegroups.com>

> On Sep 11, 11:33am, Bill Baker <wba...@postini.spamcon.org> wrote:
>
>> Of course it's an excuse.
>
> No, it's not.

Yes it is.

> God means everything He says. There would be even more
> billions in hell if the Lord Jesus's Second Coming hadn't been
> deliberately delayed by God the Father. Believe me, you don't want
> doomsday to come. Blasphemers of the Holy Spirit are going straight
> to the devil's lair.

Only Satan would want you to think that God would burn anyone for eternity.

>> Just because the Bible makes the same excuse
>
> The Holy Bible absolutely never makes excuses of any kind.

Your (Satanic) interpretation of it sure does.

>> doesn't make it less of one.
>
> You've fallen for another of Satan's many lies. He's got you totally
> confused. Have you seen a specialist about those electrodes in your
> rectum?

Why is it that whenever any of you can't prove me wrong you immediately
start thinking about my ass?

>> And then our country will slide down into the hellhole that every single
>> theocracy has gone into.
>
> There have been very few real theocracies in history. Which one do
> you have in mind when you make such a preposterous claim?

Every single one of them.

>> Those are just people who say they worship Satan for the shock value.
>
> That isn't the way they see it. The devil is pleased that they're
> doing his evil work.

Of course it's the way they see it. If Satan worship became mainstream,
they would stop.

>> You people who claim you're "True Christians" are the real Satanists.
>
> The devil told you that lie and you believe it!

The only lie told by the devil was the lie he told you when he told you that
you were a True Christian.

>> Then why do you continually try to limit God's omnipotence?
>
> I don't. Why should He save a blaspheming wretch like you?

Why shouldn't he?

>> If he
>
> He

That's what I said, he.

>> wanted sinners to repent, he'd
>
> He'd

Yes, he'd.

>> just show himself
>
> Himself

Yes, himself.

>> and tell everyone to repent.
>
> God doesn't work that way. How little you know about reality!

That's because you've been worshiping Satan.

>> If he
>
> He

Yes, he.

>> has to hide
>
> He doesn't hide. He simply doesn't reveal His Glory to the unworthy.

More proof that the "god" you worship is Satan.

>> behind ineffective preachers like you,
>
> My preaching is highly effective.

Only to those like you who have been brainwashed.

> At my church I rarely focus on the homo-sexuality issue. With Dr.
> Tucker's help, that will be changing soon. It's possible that our choir
> was successfully infiltrated. We're going to conduct a thorough witch
> hunt to find out.

That's even more proof that you worship Satan.

>> then why worship him
>
> Him

Yes, him.

>> as if he
>
> He

Yes, he.

>> were a god?
>
> Jesus is Our True Lord. You are simply a stranger to Him.

I'm happy to be a stranger to your Satanic god.

>> I agree, Satan is not a god, but you sure
>> worship him like he is one.
>
> I have NEVER worshiped Satan. You're seriously confused. When's the
> last time you had an enema?

You just can't bring yourself to admit that you worship Satan.

>> That's how so. Anyone who rules claiming a direct line to God makes
>> everyone else's life a living hell.
>
> Only those of you who are already destined for hell will feel that
> way.

See what I mean?

> A Holy Theocracy will bring True Liberation to those who are persecuted
> for their religious beliefs, as we are now.

Satan makes you think that you're "persecuted." When was the last time a
member of your church was stoned to death, nailed to a cross or even put in
jail by a non-believer?

> True Believers -- Christians, Jews, Buddhists, Confucianists, Baha'is,
> Jains, Sikhs and others -- will join hands in brotherhood. Who doesn't
> want less crime, less poverty, less hungry, less disease, less drug
> addiction, less loneliness, less pornography, less prostitution, and less
> sexual deviancy? True Christian Theocracy will put an end to the
> suffering of the righteous.

I would rather have all of that than a theocracy of any sort.

>> He did choose him to be vice president.
>
> Dick Cheney isn't the devil, but he is a wicked man.

He probably owns Satan's soul.

> That's why God cursed his family with the blight of homo-sexuality. An
> otherwise very religious woman told me today that what Bill Clinton did
> with Monica Lewinsky, a white Jew, wasn't as horrible as our church
> teaches it is. She says men in power do such things regularly. Do you
> agree? Do you think Senator Obama should have chosen Hillary Clinton
> as his vice president?

I don't really care. The whole thing was ten years ago and what happened
should have stayed between them.

>> I like wiggly lines.
>
> That figures. You probably lead a wiggly lifestyle as well.

Actually, my lifestyle is pretty boring.

>> Why don't you?
>
> Everything in its place.

Which means homosexuals were put here by God.

>> If they're all straight, the world would be very boring.
>
> God wants people to be straight. Only those who love the devil and
> choose to rebel against God are bored with the straight lifestyle.

Only those who worship Satan think that God hates homosexuality.

>> Look at every country that has tried theocracy. Given the choice between
>> a theocratic nation and a communist nation, I'll pick the communist
>> nation every time.
>
> You're welcome to defect to China once our Holy Black Queen takes
> over. All your personal property must remain here, however.

Not if I can leave before she takes over. Not that I'd ever have to worry
about that.

>> Because you can't prove that God doesn't like homosexuality.
>
> He tells those closest to Him that whenever He's asked.

That's just Satan disguised as God.

>> All you can do is tell people what Satan has told you God says.
>
> No. We speak on God's behalf. God protects us from all Satanic
> influence.

I'm sure Satan tells you that when you pray to him.

>> God is offended by love?
>
> No -- but you know homo-sexuals can't feel love.

I know that's what you Satan worshipers think.

> They stew in their own animal lusts for fresh young flesh. They are
> sexual predators and God definitely hates what they do with their bodies.

That's what Satan wants you to think.

>> More proof that you worship Satan.
>
> No. That's proof that I serve the One True Lord. You never met the
> real Jesus Christ, I'm sorry to say.

More proof that you worship Satan.

>> See? You're racist against mixed-race people.
>
> No, I'm not. I just don't believe most of them are fit to rule.

See? You're racist against mixed-race people.

>> "Pure" just like the Aryan race was pure, huh?
>
> No. There is no Aryan race, pure or otherwise.

But you sure believe in the purity of races, just like those who believed
there was an Aryan race.

>> You're a racist.
>
> They say that about all Zionists. God promised the descendants of
> Judah a throne. Holy queen Henrietta belongs on it!

There's one behind the door marked "Women."

>> To a point, yes. But neither his views nor any other preacher's views
>> should be used to run this country.
>
> Our Holy Black Queen is a prophet, not just a preacher. She is
> destined to rule over all of us. You'll either have Theocracy or
> corruption.

I'll take the corruption, thank you.

>> That's what makes you worse than a white supremacist.
>
> Face it. Barack Obama comes from bad seed, not from any royal blood.

That's what makes you worse than a white supremacist.

> Holy Queen Henrietta is a distant cousin of the Lord Jesus. How can
> we go wrong with Her Highness on the Throne of Judah?

Plenty of ways. Starting with her being on any throne other than the one
behind the door marked "Women."

>> I oppose any plan made by Satan, that's how.
>
> George W. Bush is Satan's pawn. Satan doesn't want Holy Theocracy
> either.

I'm sure that's what Satan tells you when you pray to him.

>> That ought to be good for a laugh.


>
> Why laugh at something that sincerely helps people? So many doctors
> only get people addicted to drugs. Faith healers like us can heal the
> sick and raise the dead.

Good doctors do not get people addicted to drugs. And faith healers often
mask symptoms of serious illnesses that cause people to die. I'll take my
chances with secular doctors.

>> If I'm not supposed to laugh at serious things, I can definitely laugh at
>> their "faith healing."
>
> How so? Faith healing banishes disease. The Bible states quite
> clearly that diseases are caused by demons. We cast demons out and
> bring Gospel sunshine in to replace it.

And that's what makes "faith healing" so dangerous.

>> They could at least go on The Gong Show.
>
> Do the producers use a collection plate?

I suppose you could use the gong as a collection plate.

>> Where?
>
> Right here. I'm a lady. I'm may be the only real lady you'll ever
> encounter.

If that's your definition of a lady, I thank God that this is the closest
you'll ever get to me.

>> I'm sure that's what Satan tells you when you pray to him.
>
> I don't pray to Satan. He never gets near enough to me to influence
> my behavior in any way.

That's what Satan wants you to think.

>> That's not proof. Anyone can write a book that says anything.
>
> But God inspired every word of the Holy Bible. You'll be judged by
> it!

Prove it.

>> Prove it.
>
> Just believe it. Only simpletons ask for proof.

No, intelligent people ask for proof. Simpletons believe everything they
hear.

>> No, I don't give to Satan worshipers.
>
> Then you should send all your extra money to us. We're True Christian
> Bible believers.

That's what I said, I don't give to Satan worshipers.

>> Of course it is.
>
> No. They're totally different -- even if the ignorant can't tell them
> apart.

The only ignorance here is yours, Satan worshiper.

>> Why would that be?
>
> Suffering brings us closer to God. In your case it can decrease your
> agonies in the afterlife.

Sorry, but I refuse to worship your Satanic god.

>> It's true that you were brainwashed, that is.
>
> No! It's true that I was liberated from all doubt. Now I can feel
> God's Truth within me.

That's what I said, it's true that you were brainwashed.

>> I'm not the one who brought your sick sexual fantasies into the
>> conversation.
>
> When did I say anything about sexual fantasies, sick or otherwise?

When you said you were bound and gagged and subjected to light electrical
shocks.

>> Because you may be able to force me to say something through torture, but
>> you can't make me believe it.
>
> Never underestimate the effectiveness of electroshock therapy.

Never underestimate my willpower.

>> No, I don't live near the ocean and I don't own a board.
>
> I mean the kind of friendly persuasion our troops in Iraq use on
> terrorists.

You call that friendly? More proof that you worship Satan.

>> You can deny all you want, but your own words say otherwise.
>
> I have NEVER preached hate against homo-sexuals! I pity the
> disgusting disease-infected cretins!

See what I mean? You preach hate against homosexuals.

>> You mean like when black people had separate water fountains and had to
>> sit at the back of the bus?
>
> Not exactly. I don't mind sharing water fountains or bus seats with
> homo-sexuals as long as they agree not to touch me or allow any of
> their bodily fluids to come into contact with anything of mine.
> That's only because the typical male homo-sexual carries several
> contagious diseases.

More hatred and prejudice against homosexuals.

>> That goes for straight people, too.
>
> Hypothetically, yes -- but very few of us have as many sex partners as
> the average "gay" man. I've known homo-sexuals who camp out in public
> parks and perform oral sex on twenty to forty men in a single day.

Not to say that they don't bear some responsibility for it, but that's what
happens when society rejects people because of some imagined Biblical
prohibition against certain people.

>> Only if you call Satan "Divine."
>
> No. The inspiration comes from Almighty God.

But I know you really worship Satan.

> You really are in deep denial, aren't you?

You're the one who denies that you worship Satan.

> Do you have herpes?

No.

>> Yes, it figures that you Satan worshipers would stick together.
>
> Satan wants to spread homo-sexuality. The People of God want to cure
> it.

More proof that you worship Satan.

>> I'd rather see this be a good country.


>
> It will be good ONLY if it's ruled by Divinely anointed Black Jewish
> kings and queen. Prince Cornelius Caesar is next in line after Crown
> Princess Keesha.

I'd rather see this be a good country.

>> Because everyone won't, no matter how hard you try to make them.
>
> What about all the public scourgings, floggings, and dunkings? Surely
> they will deter evil.

They never have in the past.

>> Typical excuse, calling me confused because I tell the truth about your
>> Satan worship.
>
> That's not the truth! It's another of Lucifer's lies! You are so
> confused you don't know your rectum from Satan's rumpus room.

More fantasizing about my ass just because I tell the truth about your Satan
worship.

>> ...you into a Satan-worshiper, if we go by your example.


>
> No -- sinners into saints!

"Saints" for Satan, that is.

--
Bushism 10-11:
"I've coined new words, like 'misunderstanding' and 'Hispanically.'"
--Radio-Television Correspondents Association dinner; Washington, D.C.;
March 29, 2001

(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) -- NO FACTS Support the RRR Cult's Loathsome Agendas!

unread,
Sep 13, 2008, 11:04:08 PM9/13/08
to
On Sat, 6 Sep 2008 10:04:03 -0700 (PDT),
Cousin Purlean Huggins <pur...@wowmail.com>
(aka Max) (aka M-F) ...

... is nothing but a mindless TROLL.

___________________
/| /| | |
||__|| | Do not feed the |
/ O O\ | trolls. Thank you. |
/ \ | --Mgt. |
/ \ \|__________________|
/ _ \ \ ||
/ |\____\ \ ||
/ | | | |\__/ ||
/ \|_|_|/ | _ ||
/ / \ |____| ||
/ | | | --|
| | | |__ _ --|
* _ | |_|_|_| | \-/
*-- _--\ _ \ | ||
/ _ \\ | / `
* / \_ /- | | |
* ___ c_c_c_C/ \C_c_c_c____________

Cousin Purlean Huggins

unread,
Sep 14, 2008, 4:05:35 AM9/14/08
to
On Sep 12, 2:40�am, Bill Baker <wba...@postini.spamcon.org> wrote:

> Yes it is.

God doesn't need to make any kind of excuses. Judgment Day is coming
soon enough. If you're still alive then -- and it's likely you'll be
cursed with some kind of vile disease before then, like maybe
hepatitis -- you'll see at last that True Christians like us have been
right all along.

> Only Satan would want you to think that God would burn anyone for eternity.

No. That's what the Bible says. God has no use for people who
willfully reject His Holy Truth. The smoke of their torment rises
forever -- and the fire that torments them will never be quenched.
It's Satan who's convinced you that hell isn't real, and that the
torments you will experience there won't go on for all eternity. You
shouldn't have blasphemed the Holy Spirit. You belong to the devil
now. There's no hope for you. You must burn -- and burn you will,
for all time. That's sad but those are the facts.

> Your (Satanic) interpretation of it sure does.

I am not under Satan's influence. It's obvious to everyone that you
are.

> Why is it that whenever any of you can't prove me wrong you immediately

> start thinking about my ***?

Please watch your language! I was not thinking about your backside.
Is it mostly hairy or mostly smooth, by the way? I was just
wondering. Anyway, it's been proved that when the devil possesses
sinners as he has you he typically enters them through the rectum.
Didn't you say you found prostate stimulation pleasurable? That
suggests to me that you have demonic rectal implants. You ought to
have them removed. It's not normal to want to be stimulated anally.

> Every single one of them.

Just what I thought. You couldn't provide any real-life examples.
Imperial Judah was a theocracy. It endured until Godless kings ruled
it and made alliances with pagan nations to enrich their treasuries.

> Of course it's the way they see it. �If Satan worship became mainstream,
> they would stop.

I disagree. They love corruption too much. They love sex, drugs,
violence, and chaos.

> The only lie told by the devil was the lie he told you when he told you that
> you were a True Christian.

The devil never speaks to me. God protects me from his evil
influence.

> Why shouldn't he?

Because you are unworthy of salvation. You rejected God's free love
offering. You insulted both the Holy Spirit and Saint Mary.

> That's what I said, he.

You must always capitalize pronouns that refer to God and the Lord
Jesus.

> Yes, he'd.

Literate people capitalize pronouns that refer to the Deity.

> Yes, himself.

Literate people capitalize pronouns that refer to the Deity.

> That's because you've been worshiping Satan.

I have NEVER worshiped Satan. You're confused. I urge you to have a
doctor examine you for demonic implants.

> Yes, he.

Literate people capitalize pronouns that refer to the Deity.

> More proof that the "god" you worship is Satan.

No. That's proof that you're unworthy. I've seen the Lord Jesus in
our church many times.

> Only to those like you who have been brainwashed.

No. I lead sinners like you to a saving knowledge of Jesus Christ
every day. People hear my preaching and literally beg the Lord for
mercy right on the spot.

> That's even more proof that you worship Satan.

No. God revealed to us that He doesn't want homo-sexual infiltrators
in His House. They're serving the devil anyway. Let them go to the
"gay" "church" if they want to worship something. Most of them
worship flesh, fame, or mammon -- but never the Lord.

> Yes, him.

Literate people capitalize pronouns that refer to the Deity.

> Yes, he.

Literate people capitalize pronouns that refer to the Deity.

> I'm happy to be a stranger to your Satanic god.

You are Satan's slave -- but a stranger to the Lord Jesus Christ.
You've insulted His Mother many times. She is appalled!

> You just can't bring yourself to admit that you worship Satan.

That's because I try never to lie. You're bound to know by now that
no member of our church worships Satan. It's Satan who planted that
thought in your head.

> See what I mean?

You're going to hell anyway. Our Holy Theocracy will offer hope to
millions of others who have been exploited by the current system.

> Satan makes you think that you're "persecuted." �When was the last time a
> member of your church was stoned to death, nailed to a cross or even put in
> jail by a non-believer?

Last week. Members of the church tend to have unsaved relatives who
don't approve of our faith healing methods -- even though they always
work! Our healers sometimes get into trouble when they advise
believers to throw away their beta blockers and blood thinners.

> I would rather have all of that than a theocracy of any sort.

That's because you're a slave to Satan.

> He probably owns Satan's soul.

You're confused even about obvious matters like that.

> I don't really care. �The whole thing was ten years ago and what happened
> should have stayed between them.

Every deep throat is covered by a big mouth, n'est-ce pas?

> Actually, my lifestyle is pretty boring.

But hasn't your uncircumcised penis been in several different mouths?

> Which means homosexuals were put here by God.

No way! Satan tempts the weak with sexual images and they turn homo-
sexual in response to them.

> Only those who worship Satan think that God hates homosexuality.

That's exactly what the Bible says.

> Not if I can leave before she takes over. �Not that I'd ever have to worry
> about that.

We'll come and seize your personal property wherever you are. The
Holy Hickey Family plans to rule the entire world eventually. I hope
I live to see tht day!

> That's just Satan disguised as God.

How can you tell the difference? You're a hell-bound blasphemer who
ONLY communes with the devil, never the Lord.

> I'm sure Satan tells you that when you pray to him.

We never pray to Satan and he never tells us anything.

> I know that's what you Satan worshipers think.

No. It's what our church has proved beyond any reasonable doubt.
Homo-sexual love is just a fancy term for degrading animal lust.
That's all there is to it.

> That's what Satan wants you to think.

That's what God wants you to know!

> More proof that you worship Satan.

You're the devil's little trained parrot. Didn't he teach you any
other phrases to repeat mindlessly?

> See? �You're racist against mixed-race people.

No, I'm not. They typically come from broken or unstable homes.

> But you sure believe in the purity of races, just like those who believed
> there was an Aryan race.

No, I don't. I believe God chooses leaders from stable homes.

> There's one behind the door marked "Women."

That's not the Holy Obsidian Throne of Imperial udah to which she is
heir. She will rule over you. Step out of link and she will bop you
with her Holy Scepter.

> I'll take the corruption, thank you.

You'll get plenty of it in hell. Step aside and let the Holy Family
rule the rest of the world.

> That's what makes you worse than a white supremacist.

Race is not the issue. Heritage is.

> Plenty of ways. �Starting with her being on any throne other than the one
> behind the door marked "Women."

She will end the corruption that you have embraced. Holy Queen
Henrietta stands for law and order. The Holy Bible will be our guide
to life.

> I'm sure that's what Satan tells you when you pray to him.

Don't you think it's time to change the record?

> Good doctors do not get people addicted to drugs. �

I'm sure that all ten of them are fine people. Most people have to
deal with pill-pushing quacks in thrall to Big Pharma.

> And faith healers often mask symptoms of serious illnesses that cause people to die. �

Not True Christian faith healers. We can heal any disease by casting
out the demons that cause it.

> I'll take my chances with secular doctors.

That's your choice. You'll need to pay for such services yourself and
not prevent everyone else from seeking help from bina fide faith
healers.

> And that's what makes "faith healing" so dangerous.

It's not at all dangerous. It works. On Friday I cast ten demons out
of a woman's uterus. Her quack doctors wanted to perform a
hysterectomy on her. After three hours of prayer she went right back
to work completely healed.

> I suppose you could use the gong as a collection plate.

If the audience will fill it and we can keep the proceeds, fine.

> If that's your definition of a lady, I thank God that this is the closest
> you'll ever get to me.

I can cast a legion of demons out of you if you'll let me.

> That's what Satan wants you to think.

Please change the record, Bill.

> Prove it.

Just believe me. I never lie.

> No, intelligent people ask for proof. �Simpletons believe everything they
> hear.

No. Simpletons believe the devil's lies and go to hell.

> That's what I said, I don't give to Satan worshipers.

We don't worship Satan. We can put your money to good use. Please
send us $1,000 next week and we'll arrange for you to have regular
lemonade breaks in hell.

> The only ignorance here is yours, Satan worshiper.

I'm not ignorant. I NEVER worship Satan. You're as confused as they
come. You're possessed by countless LEGIONS of Satan's demons.


That's all I have time for today. Soon Lurlean will be back on her
feet and ready to preach again.

Cousin Purlean Huggins

unread,
Sep 14, 2008, 2:23:21 PM9/14/08
to
We need to get some very basic facts straight right off the bat:

1) No one in God's One True Church worships Satan.

2) No one in God's One True Church talks to Satan.

3) No one in God's One True Church does Satan's bidding.

4) You, Bill Baker, have blasphemed both the Holy Spirit and Saint
Mary. Therefore:

5) YOU serve the devil. YOU are evil. And YOU will burn in hell for
all eternity.


On Sep 12, 2:40�am, Bill Baker <wba...@postini.spamcon.org> wrote:

> Sorry, but I refuse to worship your Satanic god.

Refer to point 1 above.

> That's what I said, it's true that you were brainwashed.

No. That's impossible. I doubted for a while but now I believe
truly. I know God hates homo-sexual lust. He has commissioned me and
other True Christians like me to cure it.

> When you said you were bound and gagged and subjected to light electrical
> shocks.

Only a pervert would equate that experience with sex, which for
norrmal people is tender and loving. I understand that the reality is
different for the homo-sexual. It's one degrading act after another
for your kind.

> Never underestimate my willpower.

The phony resolve Satan gives you can easily be thwarted.

> You call that friendly? �More proof that you worship Satan.

It accomplishes its purpose. Our Holy Black ueen will use torture to
deter crime, just as the Holy Bible teaches we should. How would you
like to be caned for your filthy blasphemy?

> See what I mean? �

No, I don't. How can I see through the devil's eyes?

> You preach hate against homosexuals.

I never have. I told you I pity them, the poor, disgusting things!
The sex acts they perform regularly are truly horrifying!

> More hatred and prejudice against homosexuals.

No. That's just more inconvenient Truth for you to deal with. Most
male homosexuals carry some kind of disease. It's a result of their
sexual promiscuity.

> Not to say that they don't bear some responsibility for it,

They bear FULL responsibility for it!

> but that's what
> happens when society rejects people because of some imagined Biblical
> prohibition against certain people.

Society here in New Sodom doesn't enact any such prohibitions. Homo-
sexuals can even openly mock marriage if they so choose. Most of them
don't. And yet the city is full of "cruisy spots" where men can have
anonymous sex with each other day and night. Much of it is unsafe --
all of it is degrading to the soul. The partners rarely speak to each
other and almost never trade names before or after the sex acts they
prform. The active partner often carries on a conversation on a cell
phone during the whole business. That kind of behavior turns homo-
sexuals on. They are arrested for having sex in public parks, rest
stops, and fitting rooms every day, even though there are dozens of
gay bars and sex clubs where that kind of activity is allowed.
Biblical prohibitions have absolutely NOTHING to do with this
perversion.

> But I know you really worship Satan.

Refer to point 1 above. Your confusion is showing again.

> You're the one who denies that you worship Satan.

That's because I don't. I never have and I never will. There is
nothing atanic about my religion. You, on the other hand, have
blasphemed the Holy Spirit AND Saint Mary. You've rejected True
Christianity and engaged in oral sodomy.

> No.

Have you been tested for it? A lot of people carry one of the many
herpes viruses but exhibit no symptoms. How well did you know the
person you sodomized orally? You never know what kind of germs thrive
in an uncircumcised man's smegma.

> More proof that you worship Satan.

It proves just the opposite -- but you're confused. That's why I
believe you've got an anal implant inside you.

> I'd rather see this be a good country.

Your record is stuck in the groove again, Bill. The Holy Hickey
Family will make this the best country ever -- but only if they rule
it as absolute Theocratic monarchs.

> They never have in the past.

They certainly did. Our prison population is larger than it ever has
been now. Holy Queen Henrietta will thin it out. More white people
will be incarcerated, and most of the criminals who are flogged,
scourged, or caned will be set free after their punishment. No
country televises punitive torture in 3D in prime time. I can assure
you that will deter crime immensely. We even plan to have underwater
cameras in the tanks we use for dunking so we can show prisoners
struggling for air during the process. Many of those will survive the
ordeal but will be forever discouraged from committing crime again.

> More fantasizing about my ***

Please don't use foul language when responding to me. It offends me
deeply. I don't fantasize about your backside. For one thing, it's
too close to smegma for my comfort.

> just because I tell the truth about your Satan worship.

You never do that. You lie constantly.

> "Saints" for Satan, that is.

No. I mean saints for Jesus.

> "I've coined new words, like 'misunderstanding' and 'Hispanically.'"
> --Radio-Television Correspondents Association dinner; Washington, D.C.;
> � March 29, 2001

We urgently need an educated Royal Family in this country as soon as
possible.

Juan M

unread,
Sep 14, 2008, 2:36:40 PM9/14/08
to

"Cousin Purlean Huggins" <pur...@wowmail.com> wrote in message
news:9ae48f10-6a14-4b46...@w39g2000prb.googlegroups.com...

We need to get some very basic facts straight right off the bat:

1) No one in God's One True Church worships Satan.

2) No one in God's One True Church talks to Satan.

3) No one in God's One True Church does Satan's bidding.

4) You, Bill Baker, have blasphemed both the Holy Spirit and Saint
Mary. Therefore:

5) YOU serve the devil. YOU are evil. And YOU will burn in hell for
all eternity.


On Sep 12, 2:40?am, Bill Baker <wba...@postini.spamcon.org> wrote:

> Sorry, but I refuse to worship your Satanic god.

Refer to point 1 above.

> That's what I said, it's true that you were brainwashed.

No. That's impossible. I doubted for a while but now I believe
truly. I know God hates homo-sexual lust. He has commissioned me and
other True Christians like me to cure it.

> When you said you were bound and gagged and subjected to light electrical
> shocks.

Only a pervert would equate that experience with sex, which for
norrmal people is tender and loving. I understand that the reality is
different for the homo-sexual. It's one degrading act after another
for your kind.

> Never underestimate my willpower.

The phony resolve Satan gives you can easily be thwarted.

> You call that friendly? ?More proof that you worship Satan.

It accomplishes its purpose. Our Holy Black ueen will use torture to
deter crime, just as the Holy Bible teaches we should. How would you
like to be caned for your filthy blasphemy?

> See what I mean? ?

> No.

> ? March 29, 2001

We urgently need an educated Royal Family in this country as soon as
possible.


Cousin Purlean Huggins
Your Heavenly Connection

Doesn't every church believe it is God's True Church?


(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) -- NO FACTS Support the RRR Cult's Loathsome Agendas!

unread,
Sep 14, 2008, 3:08:32 PM9/14/08
to
On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 11:23:21 -0700 (PDT),
Cousin Purlean Huggins <pur...@wowmail.com>
(aka M-F) (aka Max) wrote:


> We need to get some very basic facts straight right off the bat:

Or, in this case, in lieu of facts, some fantasies.

> 1) No one in God's One True Church worships Satan.
>
> 2) No one in God's One True Church talks to Satan.
>
> 3) No one in God's One True Church does Satan's bidding.
>
> 4) You, Bill Baker, have blasphemed both the Holy Spirit and Saint
> Mary. Therefore:
>
> 5) YOU serve the devil. YOU are evil. And YOU will burn in hell for
> all eternity.

ROTFL!!! You are FUNNIER than hell, M-F/Max. It's always
nice to see a little comic relief.

Cousin Purlean Huggins

unread,
Sep 14, 2008, 5:56:20 PM9/14/08
to
On Sep 14, 11:36�am, "Juan M" <jdmollanSPAMME...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> Doesn't every church believe it is God's True Church?

No. Many freely acknowledge that theirs in an offshoot of one church
or another. We believe there are True Christians in most churches --
but that the Lord came to establish only one True Church. Our Holy
Church is actually called God's One True Church of Holy Assurance.
Unlike the others, we are SURE we're part of the original church that
the Lord Jesus founded among the Black Jews of Galilee almost 2,000
years ago. Hence we can give others that same blessed assurance. We
know because our Holy Church is still administrated by Messianic Black
Jews related to Jesus Christ. We welcome members of all races into
our Holy Church -- as long as they agree to abide by our 2,750 simple
rules of True Christian conduct. Our Holy Church is the vanguard of
the Kingdom of God that the Lord spoke of in the Gospels. For those
reasons our Holy Church is also called the First Universal Christian
Kingdom.

We hope you'll consider joining us -- or at least sending us a nice
contribution to help with our evangelical work.


Jesus loves you,

Cousin Purlean Huggins
Your Heavenly Connection

First Universal Christian Kingdom
Prayer Box 424326
New Sodom (Formerly San Francisco), CA 94142

Cousin Purlean Huggins

unread,
Sep 14, 2008, 6:04:27 PM9/14/08
to
On Sep 14, 12:08�pm, "(�`�.�Craig Chilton�.���) -- NO FACTS Support
the RRR Cult's Loathsome Agendas!" <xanadu2...@mchsi.com> wrote:

> (aka M-*)

God will punish you for making fun of my cousin's good name. You're
such a juvenile!

> (aka Max):

I'm not Max. Max is a white Jew. Why would a Jew preach the Gospel
to sinners? They don't care whether gentiles are saved or not.

> � � Or, in this case, in lieu of facts, some fantasies.

I ONLY deal in facts. Bill Baker is a lying blasphemer who's
sodomized people orally. He goes to gay bars too. I think we're all
aware of the terrible things that go on in such places. That could
easily be where this oral sodomy took place. He's not even
circumcised. Only perverts want to put their mouths on uncircumcised
penises because of their foul odor.

> � � �ROTFL!!! �You are FUNNIER than hell, M-*/Max. �

I'm Cousin Purlean. You're confused again. Don't you normally take a
pill when you feel dizzy?

> It's always nice to see a little comic relief.

Then go buy a comic book with beefy superheroes in it and play with
yourself while you read it. I'm trying to save souls here. Didn't
you call me a "troll" just yesterday. What a hypocrite you are! God
is truly going to teach you some tough lessons. How dare you advise
ignorant women to kill their unborn children! God will hold you
personally accountable for every life lost as a result of your evil
words.


Repent now! Judgment Day is coming soon!

Cousin Purlean Huggins

unread,
Sep 14, 2008, 6:18:26 PM9/14/08
to
On Sep 11, 12:35�pm, juanjo <jonpe...@mindspring.com> wrote:

> On Sep 9, 7:27�pm, Cousin Purlean Huggins <purl...@wowmail.com> a well
> know alter ego to a wanna be funny boy named Max wrote:

I am not Max. As I have explained before, Max is a white Jew. White
Jews don't preach the Gospel on Usenet. I'm Cousin Purlean Huggins, a
True Christian evangelist. I'm not trying to be funny either. I'm
here to help you find salvation.

> Assuming for a moment you were actually a woman

I am. I am a mother of eight.

> which of course you are not,

Which of course I unquestionably am. You're as confused as Bill and
Craig.

> then your very presence here is affront to the "True Gospel"
> which strictly prohibits women from engaging in �such "evangelical"

> activities. �

It does not. Did you ever hear of Mary Magdalene? She brought the
Good News about Our Lord's Resurrection to His remaining disciples on
the first Easter Sunday. The Apostle Paul forbade the Corinthian
women from speaking in church, not women in general. I was born in
Mississippi and live in Texas. I am NOT a Corinthian woman. Paul
also wrote to Timothy that he personally wouldn't allow "a woman" to
teach. That woman taught Timothy doctrinal error but has since died.
I am not that woman. I am your Cousin Purlean. Listen to my
preaching and repent. You have borne false witness against my baby
cousin Lurlean. You are destined for the Pit of Hell right now. God
demands a public repentance and testimony.

> As a result, one can safely conclude you are in fact a
> Tool of the Devil sent here to deceive unbelievers by making the Lord
> God Jehovah look absurd through your prattling nonsense and thereby
> encourage sinners to continue on the folly until the final trumpet
> sounds thus sending them into the abyss with you.

There are grammatical errors in that long sentence. If anyone around
here is prattling nonsense, it's you, not I. I am pure in heart.

> Since in fact you are a man

I am not!

> pretending to be a women

A women? Wouldn't that be complicated? Anyway, I am a real woman.
You're just confused -- about facts, about grammar, and about
punctuation.

> the situation is even worse. �

For you it is. You're going to hell!

> This makes you a transsexual wannabe,

Oh please! Do you even know what a transsexual is?

> a pervert according to the Holy Writ of Christendom. �

How so? Cross-dressing is forbidden, yes, but not ghost-writing for a
member of the opposite sex. That hasn't happened in my case anyway.

> Your very presence here is affront
> to Jesus Christ and is even further indication that you are in fact a
> Tool of the Devil sent here to deceive unbelievers by making the Lord
> God Jehovah look absurd through your prattling nonsense and thereby
> encourage sinners to continue on the folly until the final trumpet
> sounds thus sending them into the abyss with you.

Was that supposed to make sense?

> So no matter how one looks at the issue, your posts here are an
> affront of Lord God Jehovah who

Who

> does not take kindly on

On? Are you foreign?

> those who mock Him or His Works. �

I never do.

> You do so at your peril. �

I'm pure in heart.

> It is clear that you are a Tool of Satan sent here to deceive unbelievers by
> making the Lord God Jehovah look absurd through your prattling
> nonsense and thereby encourage sinners to continue on the folly until the final
> trumpet sounds thus sending them into the abyss with you.

You're obviously talking about Bill Baker. The meaningless repetition
proves as much.

> Get thee behind me Satan, back to the Pit with you!

God sent me here, not Satan. You are obviously of the devil yourself
because you have borne false witness against my baby cousin. She does
not sell her body or even hang out near Don's of Sixth Street for any
reason.


I will pray for your deluded soul, brother,

(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) -- NO FACTS Support the RRR Cult's Loathsome Agendas!

unread,
Sep 14, 2008, 6:59:49 PM9/14/08
to
On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 15:04:27 -0700 (PDT),
"Cousin Purlean Huggins"/"Mother-Fucker"/Max <pur...@wowmail.com> wrote:
> Craig Chilton-- NO FACTS Support the RRR Cult's Loathsome
> Agendas!" <xanad...@mchsi.com> wrote:


>> (aka M-F)

> God will punish you...

...yada-yada-yada...

>> (aka Max):

> I'm not Max.

You've been outed as Max many times, M-F. And now you
are stupidly pretending to be a cousin. Yeah. Right.

Either way, except for giving us all an occasional chuckle,
you're a waste of time, M-F/Max.

<snip>

>> It's always nice to see a little comic relief.

<bullcrap-snip>

Bill Baker

unread,
Sep 17, 2008, 1:01:35 PM9/17/08
to
On Sunday September 14 2008 04:05, Cousin Purlean Huggins
<pur...@wowmail.com> wrote in message
news:<5236b3c9-aad6-4119...@n38g2000prl.googlegroups.com>

> On Sep 12, 2:40am, Bill Baker <wba...@postini.spamcon.org> wrote:
>
>> Yes it is.
>
> God doesn't need to make any kind of excuses.

Then why do you make excuses for him? Because you worship Satan, that's
why.

> Judgment Day is coming soon enough. If you're still alive then -- and
> it's likely you'll be cursed with some kind of vile disease before then,
> like maybe hepatitis -- you'll see at last that True Christians like us
> have been right all along.

You'll forgive me if I don't take the word of a known Satan worshiper like
you.

>> Only Satan would want you to think that God would burn anyone for
>> eternity.
>
> No. That's what the Bible says.

That's what Satan's interpretation of the Bible says.

> God has no use for people who willfully reject His Holy Truth. The smoke
> of their torment rises forever -- and the fire that torments them will
> never be quenched.

See? You're just going by Satan's interpretation.

> It's Satan who's convinced you that hell isn't real, and that the
> torments you will experience there won't go on for all eternity.

Is that what Satan told you when you prayed to him?

> You shouldn't have blasphemed the Holy Spirit. You belong to the devil
> now. There's no hope for you. You must burn -- and burn you will,
> for all time. That's sad but those are the facts.

That's what Satan wants you to believe.

>> Your (Satanic) interpretation of it sure does.
>
> I am not under Satan's influence. It's obvious to everyone that you
> are.

You're the one who is speaking Satan's words every time you post.

>> Why is it that whenever any of you can't prove me wrong you immediately
>> start thinking about my ***?
>
> Please watch your language!

I am. It looks fine to me.

> I was not thinking about your backside.

You're the one who brought it up when it was completely unrelated to the
subject.

> Is it mostly hairy or mostly smooth, by the way?

See? You can't stop thinking about it.

> I was just wondering. Anyway, it's been proved that when the devil
> possesses sinners as he has you he typically enters them through the
> rectum.

Proved by who? Your Satanic cult?

> Didn't you say you found prostate stimulation pleasurable?

Go ahead and try to find a post of mine that says that.

> That suggests to me that you have demonic rectal implants. You ought to
> have them removed. It's not normal to want to be stimulated anally.

God obviously has no problem with some people not being normal, since he
created so many variations on normalcy, including homosexuality. Only
Satan wants to make people think God wants everyone normal and boring so
that they turn away from God.

>> Every single one of them.
>
> Just what I thought. You couldn't provide any real-life examples.

I just did. Every single one of them.

> Imperial Judah was a theocracy. It endured until Godless kings ruled
> it and made alliances with pagan nations to enrich their treasuries.

See what I mean?

>> Of course it's the way they see it. If Satan worship became mainstream,
>> they would stop.
>
> I disagree. They love corruption too much. They love sex, drugs,
> violence, and chaos.

They would just do those things under the worship of something different,
like maybe the Super Devil.

>> The only lie told by the devil was the lie he told you when he told you
>> that you were a True Christian.
>
> The devil never speaks to me. God protects me from his evil
> influence.

I'm sure that's what Satan tells you when you pray to him.

>> Why shouldn't he?


>
> Because you are unworthy of salvation. You rejected God's free love
> offering. You insulted both the Holy Spirit and Saint Mary.

More proof that you worship Satan.

>> That's what I said, he.


>
> You must always capitalize pronouns that refer to God and the Lord
> Jesus.

Make me.

>> Yes, he'd.
>
> Literate people capitalize pronouns that refer to the Deity.

Make me.

>> Yes, himself.
>
> Literate people capitalize pronouns that refer to the Deity.

Make me.

>> That's because you've been worshiping Satan.
>
> I have NEVER worshiped Satan. You're confused. I urge you to have a
> doctor examine you for demonic implants.

You mean one of your Satan worshiping quack so-called "doctors?" Because no
real doctor would ever find such a thing.

>> Yes, he.
>
> Literate people capitalize pronouns that refer to the Deity.

Make me.

>> More proof that the "god" you worship is Satan.
>
> No. That's proof that you're unworthy. I've seen the Lord Jesus in
> our church many times.

That's Satan in disguise.

>> Only to those like you who have been brainwashed.
>
> No. I lead sinners like you to a saving knowledge of Jesus Christ
> every day. People hear my preaching and literally beg the Lord for
> mercy right on the spot.

I'm sure Satan gives you that power over stupid and gullible people.

>> That's even more proof that you worship Satan.
>
> No. God revealed to us that He doesn't want homo-sexual infiltrators
> in His House. They're serving the devil anyway. Let them go to the
> "gay" "church" if they want to worship something. Most of them
> worship flesh, fame, or mammon -- but never the Lord.

That's even more proof that you worship Satan.

>> Yes, him.
>
> Literate people capitalize pronouns that refer to the Deity.

Make me.

>> Yes, he.
>
> Literate people capitalize pronouns that refer to the Deity.

Make me.

>> I'm happy to be a stranger to your Satanic god.
>
> You are Satan's slave -- but a stranger to the Lord Jesus Christ.
> You've insulted His Mother many times. She is appalled!

I'm sure that's what Satan tells you when you pray to him.

>> You just can't bring yourself to admit that you worship Satan.


>
> That's because I try never to lie.

Except when you say you don't worship Satan.

> You're bound to know by now that no member of our church worships Satan.

I can see Satan's words coming from you.

> It's Satan who planted that thought in your head.

Is that what he told you when you prayed to him?

>> See what I mean?
>
> You're going to hell anyway. Our Holy Theocracy will offer hope to
> millions of others who have been exploited by the current system.

Unless they refuse to believe as you do and worship Satan with you.

>> Satan makes you think that you're "persecuted." When was the last time a
>> member of your church was stoned to death, nailed to a cross or even put
>> in jail by a non-believer?
>
> Last week.

So which one was it? And have you brought the person up on murder charges
or false imprisonment?

> Members of the church tend to have unsaved relatives who don't approve of
> our faith healing methods -- even though they always work! Our healers
> sometimes get into trouble when they advise believers to throw away their
> beta blockers and blood thinners.

Practicing medicine without a license is a justifiable reason for throwing
someone in jail.

>> I would rather have all of that than a theocracy of any sort.
>
> That's because you're a slave to Satan.

No, that's because I refuse to worship your Satanic god.

>> He probably owns Satan's soul.
>
> You're confused even about obvious matters like that.

Come on, couldn't you just see Dick Cheney giving Satan pointers on how to
torture people?

>> I don't really care. The whole thing was ten years ago and what happened
>> should have stayed between them.
>
> Every deep throat is covered by a big mouth, n'est-ce pas?

Sometimes that's a good thing, as in W. Mark Felt's case.

>> Actually, my lifestyle is pretty boring.
>
> But hasn't your uncircumcised penis been in several different mouths?

Has it? When did I ever say that?

>> Which means homosexuals were put here by God.
>
> No way! Satan tempts the weak with sexual images and they turn homo-
> sexual in response to them.

That's what Satan wants you to think.

>> Only those who worship Satan think that God hates homosexuality.


>
> That's exactly what the Bible says.

That's how Satan interprets it for you.

>> Not if I can leave before she takes over. Not that I'd ever have to
>> worry about that.
>
> We'll come and seize your personal property wherever you are.

I would shoot anyone who tries.

> The Holy Hickey Family plans to rule the entire world eventually. I hope
> I live to see tht day!

If you do, you won't live long afterward, since many people would revolt.

>> That's just Satan disguised as God.
>
> How can you tell the difference?

Easily. Satan's words come from you, therefore you worship Satan.

> You're a hell-bound blasphemer who ONLY communes with the devil, never the
> Lord.

Is that what Satan told you when you prayed to him?

>> I'm sure Satan tells you that when you pray to him.
>
> We never pray to Satan and he never tells us anything.

I'm sure Satan tells you to believe that.

>> I know that's what you Satan worshipers think.
>
> No. It's what our church has proved beyond any reasonable doubt.
> Homo-sexual love is just a fancy term for degrading animal lust.
> That's all there is to it.

You Satan worshipers haven't proved a thing but your own ignorance and
hatred for God's children.

>> That's what Satan wants you to think.
>
> That's what God wants you to know!

More proof that you worship Satan.

>> More proof that you worship Satan.
>
> You're the devil's little trained parrot. Didn't he teach you any
> other phrases to repeat mindlessly?

Sometimes you have to repeat the truth over and over for people to start
seeing the error of their ways.

>> See? You're racist against mixed-race people.
>
> No, I'm not. They typically come from broken or unstable homes.

See? You're racist against mixed-race people.

>> But you sure believe in the purity of races, just like those who believed
>> there was an Aryan race.
>
> No, I don't. I believe God chooses leaders from stable homes.

More proof that you worship Satan.

>> There's one behind the door marked "Women."


>
> That's not the Holy Obsidian Throne of Imperial udah to which she is
> heir. She will rule over you. Step out of link and she will bop you
> with her Holy Scepter.

More proof that you (and she) worship Satan.

>> I'll take the corruption, thank you.
>
> You'll get plenty of it in hell. Step aside and let the Holy Family
> rule the rest of the world.

Then the entire world would be hell.

>> That's what makes you worse than a white supremacist.
>
> Race is not the issue. Heritage is.

And that's what makes you worse than a white supremacist.

>> Plenty of ways. Starting with her being on any throne other than the one
>> behind the door marked "Women."
>
> She will end the corruption that you have embraced. Holy Queen
> Henrietta stands for law and order. The Holy Bible will be our guide
> to life.

Thus bringing a whole new brand of Satanic corruption.

>> I'm sure that's what Satan tells you when you pray to him.
>
> Don't you think it's time to change the record?

Not until I get you to believe the truth.

>> Good doctors do not get people addicted to drugs.
>
> I'm sure that all ten of them are fine people. Most people have to
> deal with pill-pushing quacks in thrall to Big Pharma.

Good doctors are the majority. Any doctor who gets patients addicted to
pills runs the risk of getting his license revoked.

>> And faith healers often mask symptoms of serious illnesses that cause
>> people to die.
>
> Not True Christian faith healers. We can heal any disease by casting
> out the demons that cause it.

And that's what makes them so dangerous.

>> I'll take my chances with secular doctors.
>
> That's your choice. You'll need to pay for such services yourself and
> not prevent everyone else from seeking help from bina fide faith
> healers.

I don't prevent anyone from seeking help from fraudulent quacks. I just
wouldn't do it myself.

>> And that's what makes "faith healing" so dangerous.
>
> It's not at all dangerous. It works. On Friday I cast ten demons out
> of a woman's uterus. Her quack doctors wanted to perform a
> hysterectomy on her. After three hours of prayer she went right back
> to work completely healed.

That you believe that just proves my point that faith healing is dangerous.

>> I suppose you could use the gong as a collection plate.
>
> If the audience will fill it and we can keep the proceeds, fine.

There's no guarantees.

>> If that's your definition of a lady, I thank God that this is the closest
>> you'll ever get to me.
>
> I can cast a legion of demons out of you if you'll let me.

Do it, then. But don't expect to get anywhere near me. If Jesus could heal
a little girl remotely, then you should be able to do it without touching
me.

>> That's what Satan wants you to think.
>
> Please change the record, Bill.

Not until you believe the truth.

>> Prove it.
>
> Just believe me. I never lie.

Too late, you just lied.

>> No, intelligent people ask for proof. Simpletons believe everything they
>> hear.
>
> No. Simpletons believe the devil's lies and go to hell.

That's what Satan wants you to think.

>> That's what I said, I don't give to Satan worshipers.


>
> We don't worship Satan. We can put your money to good use. Please
> send us $1,000 next week and we'll arrange for you to have regular
> lemonade breaks in hell.

I don't give money to Satan worshipers like you.

>> The only ignorance here is yours, Satan worshiper.
>
> I'm not ignorant. I NEVER worship Satan. You're as confused as they
> come. You're possessed by countless LEGIONS of Satan's demons.

I'm sure that's what Satan told you when you prayed to him.

--
Bushism 6-19:
"Do you have blacks, too?"
--To Brazilian president Fernando Cardoso; Washington, D.C.; November 8,
2001

Bill Baker

unread,
Sep 17, 2008, 1:19:03 PM9/17/08
to
On Sunday September 14 2008 14:23, Cousin Purlean Huggins
<pur...@wowmail.com> wrote in message
news:<9ae48f10-6a14-4b46...@w39g2000prb.googlegroups.com>

> We need to get some very basic facts straight right off the bat:
>
> 1) No one in God's One True Church worships Satan.

Then you must not be in God's One True Church.

> 2) No one in God's One True Church talks to Satan.

Unless you go there.

> 3) No one in God's One True Church does Satan's bidding.

Unless you go there.

> 4) You, Bill Baker, have blasphemed both the Holy Spirit and Saint
> Mary. Therefore:
>
> 5) YOU serve the devil. YOU are evil. And YOU will burn in hell for
> all eternity.

That's what Satan wants you to believe.

> On Sep 12, 2:40am, Bill Baker <wba...@postini.spamcon.org> wrote:
>
>> Sorry, but I refuse to worship your Satanic god.
>
> Refer to point 1 above.

Refer to my response to point 1.

>> That's what I said, it's true that you were brainwashed.
>
> No. That's impossible. I doubted for a while but now I believe
> truly. I know God hates homo-sexual lust. He has commissioned me and
> other True Christians like me to cure it.

That's what Satan wants you to believe.

>> When you said you were bound and gagged and subjected to light electrical
>> shocks.
>
> Only a pervert would equate that experience with sex, which for
> norrmal people is tender and loving. I understand that the reality is
> different for the homo-sexual. It's one degrading act after another
> for your kind.

That's what you Satanists want to believe.

>> Never underestimate my willpower.
>
> The phony resolve Satan gives you can easily be thwarted.

No it can't, and many have tried.

>> You call that friendly? More proof that you worship Satan.
>
> It accomplishes its purpose. Our Holy Black ueen will use torture to
> deter crime, just as the Holy Bible teaches we should. How would you
> like to be caned for your filthy blasphemy?

Didn't Thurgood try something like that with homosexuals and a baseball bat?

>> See what I mean?
>
> No, I don't. How can I see through the devil's eyes?

Easily, since you pray to him all the time.

>> You preach hate against homosexuals.
>
> I never have. I told you I pity them, the poor, disgusting things!
> The sex acts they perform regularly are truly horrifying!

See what I mean? You preach hate against homosexuals.

>> More hatred and prejudice against homosexuals.
>
> No. That's just more inconvenient Truth for you to deal with. Most
> male homosexuals carry some kind of disease. It's a result of their
> sexual promiscuity.

Most of those diseases are only sexually transmitted, though.

>> Not to say that they don't bear some responsibility for it,
>
> They bear FULL responsibility for it!

Only to the point that they make their own decisions on how to deal with
society's hatred for them.

>> but that's what
>> happens when society rejects people because of some imagined Biblical
>> prohibition against certain people.
>
> Society here in New Sodom doesn't enact any such prohibitions.

They did until a judge told the state they have to let them get married.

> Homo-sexuals can even openly mock marriage if they so choose.

Only recently was that made legal.

> Most of them don't. And yet the city is full of "cruisy spots" where men
> can have anonymous sex with each other day and night. Much of it is
> unsafe -- all of it is degrading to the soul. The partners rarely speak
> to each other and almost never trade names before or after the sex acts
> they prform. The active partner often carries on a conversation on a cell
> phone during the whole business. That kind of behavior turns homo-
> sexuals on. They are arrested for having sex in public parks, rest
> stops, and fitting rooms every day, even though there are dozens of
> gay bars and sex clubs where that kind of activity is allowed.
> Biblical prohibitions have absolutely NOTHING to do with this
> perversion.

See what prejudice against gays for so many years has done?

>> But I know you really worship Satan.
>
> Refer to point 1 above. Your confusion is showing again.

Refer to my response to point 1 above. Your denial is showing again.

>> You're the one who denies that you worship Satan.
>
> That's because I don't. I never have and I never will. There is
> nothing atanic about my religion. You, on the other hand, have
> blasphemed the Holy Spirit AND Saint Mary. You've rejected True
> Christianity and engaged in oral sodomy.

I would reject anything you Satanists worship.

>> No.
>
> Have you been tested for it?

Indirectly, yes.

> A lot of people carry one of the many herpes viruses but exhibit no
> symptoms. How well did you know the person you sodomized orally?

Very well.

> You never know what kind of germs thrive in an uncircumcised man's smegma.

Yes, but fortunately if the man doesn't have smegma then there are a lot
fewer germs.

>> More proof that you worship Satan.
>
> It proves just the opposite -- but you're confused. That's why I
> believe you've got an anal implant inside you.

You can deny your Satan worship all you want. I know the truth.

>> I'd rather see this be a good country.
>
> Your record is stuck in the groove again, Bill.

I only repeat the truth.

> The Holy Hickey Family will make this the best country ever -- but only if
> they rule it as absolute Theocratic monarchs.

That would make it the worst country ever.

>> They never have in the past.
>
> They certainly did.

No they didn't. In fact, crime was even worse back then.

> Our prison population is larger than it ever has been now. Holy Queen
> Henrietta will thin it out. More white people will be incarcerated, and
> most of the criminals who are flogged, scourged, or caned will be set free
> after their punishment. No country televises punitive torture in 3D in
> prime time. I can assure you that will deter crime immensely. We even
> plan to have underwater cameras in the tanks we use for dunking so we can
> show prisoners struggling for air during the process. Many of those will
> survive the ordeal but will be forever discouraged from committing crime
> again.

No, you'll just discourage them from getting caught.

>> More fantasizing about my ***
>
> Please don't use foul language when responding to me. It offends me
> deeply. I don't fantasize about your backside. For one thing, it's
> too close to smegma for my comfort.

There you go, fantasizing about my ass AND my imaginary smegma.

>> just because I tell the truth about your Satan worship.
>
> You never do that. You lie constantly.

I only tell the truth about your Satan worship.

>> "Saints" for Satan, that is.
>
> No. I mean saints for Jesus.

Satan disguised as Jesus, that is.

>> "I've coined new words, like 'misunderstanding' and 'Hispanically.'"
>> --Radio-Television Correspondents Association dinner; Washington, D.C.;
>> March 29, 2001
>
> We urgently need an educated Royal Family in this country as soon as
> possible.

I would take eight more years of Bush over that.

Cousin Purlean Huggins

unread,
Sep 19, 2008, 9:27:25 PM9/19/08
to
On Sep 17, 10:01�am, Bill Baker <wba...@postini.spamcon.org> wrote:

I can see you're still having trouble digesting the facts, Bill. Let
me reiterate them for you:

1) No one in God's One True Church worships Satan.

2) No one in God's One True Church talks to Satan.

3) No one in God's One True Church does Satan's bidding.

4) No one in God's One True Church ever prays to Satan.

5) You, Bill Baker, have blasphemed both the Holy Spirit and Saint
Mary. Therefore:

6) YOU serve the devil. YOU are evil. And YOU will burn in hell for
all eternity.

> Then why do you make excuses for him? �

Him

> Because you worship Satan, that's why.

Refer to Fact 1 above.

> You'll forgive me

How can I? You've committed the Unforgivable Sin!

> if I don't take the word of a known Satan worshiper like
> you.

Refer to Fact 1 above again.

> That's what Satan's interpretation of the Bible says.

No. Satan's "interpretation" of the Holy Bible teaches that even
Godless uncircumcised blasphemers of the Holy Spirit will be saved.
True Believers like me know that unrepentant sinners will suffer
eternal torment in the fires of hell. We will look on from on high
and praise God for justice done as you weep and wail and gnash your
teeth forever. Hallelujah!

> See? �You're just going by Satan's interpretation.

NO. That's exactly what the Bible says. What do you think those Holy
Words mean? That you'll have free barbecued ribs forever?

> Is that what Satan told you when you prayed to him?

Refer to Fact 4 above.

> That's what Satan wants you to believe.

No. Satan wants us to believe the same silly lies he's convinced you
to believe. We refuse.

> You're the one who is speaking Satan's words every time you post.

You are literally filled with confusion.

> I am. �It looks fine to me.

It sounds disgusting to me.

> You're the one who brought it up when it was completely unrelated to the
> subject.

The electrodes that Satan implanted in you are germane to the subject
of which of us really serves the devil. You do. I don't.

> See? �You can't stop thinking about it.

That was just a simple question. Our Brother Phinehas was watching a
homo-sexual movie the other day that involved anilingus -- as most of
them do in one form or another. I was just innocently wondering
whether the experience was anything like that for you. How could
anybody do such a thing, especially with a lot of hair in the way?

> Proved by who? �Your Satanic cult?

I'm not part of any cult, Satanic or otherwise. Your confusion is
showing again.

> Go ahead and try to find a post of mine that says that.

I'm paraphrasing -- but don't you?

> God obviously has no problem with some people not being normal, since he

He

> created so many variations on normalcy, including homosexuality. �

No. Satan unleashed that sexual perversion in the world to thwart
God's special family plan for us all.

> Only Satan wants to make people think God wants everyone normal and boring so
> that they turn away from God.

God doesn't want anything to be boring. The trouble is that sinners
like you easily tire of doing good and consequently turn to evil.

> I just did. �Every single one of them.

The coming Holy Black Theocracy will never fail.

> See what I mean?

Holy Queen Henrietta will do what King Saul did not and obliterate all
pagan influence from the world.

> They would just do those things under the worship of something different,
> like maybe the Super Devil.

No devil can gain even a modest foothold in a Holy Theocracy.

> I'm sure that's what Satan tells you when you pray to him.

Refer to Fact 4 above.

> More proof that you worship Satan.

How so? I didnt blaspheme anyone. You did. You're also
uncircumcised. God is disgusted with your foul-smelling penis.

> Make me.

I don't make trash. I burn it.

> Make me.

If you want to go through life being thought ignorant, who am I to
interfere?

> Make me.

See above.

> You mean one of your Satan worshiping quack so-called "doctors?" �

No. I mean a bona fide faith healer.

> Because no real doctor would ever find such a thing.

given half a chance, Dr. Tucker could easily find several implants in
your rectum and colon.

> Make me.

Change the record.

> That's Satan in disguise.

I can tell the difference even if you can't. The Lord performs
miracles. Satan can only make empty promises.

> I'm sure Satan gives you that power over stupid and gullible people.

I have to go gt ready for tonight's witch hunt. Dr. Tucker is going
to name names and send dozens of hypocrites on a long guilt trip. I'm
sad that you couldn't have contributed something tangible to our cause
-- something like $1,000. Oh well... You'll get yours on Judgment
Day.


Praying for sinners everywhere,

(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) -- NO FACTS Support the RRR Cult's Loathsome Agendas!

unread,
Sep 19, 2008, 9:36:21 PM9/19/08
to
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 18:27:25 -0700 (PDT),
Cousin Purlean Huggins
(aka M-F) <aka Max) <pur...@wowmail.com> wrote:


> For SHAME: Sarah Palin's 17-year-old Daughter is
> Pregnant -- Out of WEDLOCK!!!

Big whoop! And... it took you THIS LONG to learn
about that, M-F/Max?

robw

unread,
Sep 20, 2008, 12:45:16 PM9/20/08
to
Yeah., it is a big whoop.

Why isn't the girl married?
She's five months along.

But Mommy gets the VP nod and all of a sudden the little slut is going to
marry a guy who said he didn't want kids.

McPerky is a hypocritical twat and we're going to rip her.


"(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) -- NO FACTS Support the RRR Cult's Loathsome
Agendas!" <xanad...@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:kpk8d4phe4l5knfoc...@4ax.com...

Cousin Purlean Huggins

unread,
Sep 20, 2008, 8:53:59 PM9/20/08
to
On Sep 19, 6:36�pm, "(�`�.�Craig Chilton�.���) -- NO FACTS Support

the RRR Cult's Loathsome Agendas!" <xanadu2...@mchsi.com> wrote:

> Cousin Purlean Huggins (aka M-F)

Nobody in their right mind calls me such crude names -- only dirty old
codgers like you.

> <aka Max)

No one would mistake me for a middle-aged white Jew either. Your
confusion is showing.

> � � Big whoop! �

To God it certainly is. The Palins obviously didn't rear their
children in the nurture and admonition of the Lord as the Bible says
they must. They probably even spared the rod. If I found out that
any of my children were even contemplating fornication, I'd have them
throughly scourged. Children who are spanked regularly tend to be
better equipped to control their sexual urges during the difficult
teenage years. In my grandfather's day a woman who slept around with
men could be forcibly sterilized. We hope to revive that practice in
the Coming Kingdom. Clitoridectomies can help with such issues as
well. I hope Satan doesn't tuern any of her children homo-sexual the
way he did with Dick Cheney's daughter. Homo-sexuality is a sure sign
of parental neglect.

> And... it took you THIS LONG to learn about that, M-F/Max?

If you have a question for Max, why don't you ask him? I'm Cousin
Purlean. The good Dr. Tucker, father of five, will be back to preach
to you before long. Sinners like you need to hear vivid descriptions
of the horrors of hell.


I'll pray for you,

(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) -- NO FACTS Support the RRR Cult's Loathsome Agendas!

unread,
Sep 20, 2008, 10:29:37 PM9/20/08
to
On Sat, 20 Sep 2008 17:53:59 -0700 (PDT),
Cousin Purlean Huggins
(aka M-F) <aka Max) <pur...@wowmail.com> wrote:
> Craig Chilton -- NO FACTS Support the RRR Cult's Loathsome
> Agendas!" <xanad...@mchsi.com> wrote:
>> Cousin Purlean Huggins (aka M-F)(aka Max) wrote:


> Nobody in their right mind...

... would give one WHIT of credibility to YOU, M-F/Max.

<flush>

Cousin Purlean Huggins

unread,
Sep 21, 2008, 9:53:45 AM9/21/08
to
On Sep 20, 7:29�pm, "(�`�.�Craig Chilton�.���) -- NO FACTS Support

the RRR Cult's Loathsome Agendas!" <xanadu2...@mchsi.com> wrote:

> Cousin Purlean Huggins

That's right. Remember that -- in your dotage.

> (aka M-F) <aka Max)

Your confusion is showing again.

> � � �... would give one WHIT of credibility to YOU,

The vast majority of those who doubt my Gospel testimony will burn in
hell forever. I urge you to choose wisely.

> M-F/Max.

Confused again? I'm Cousin Purlean Huggins. I'll pray that God
clears your foggy mind.

> <flush>

I'm sure you spend a lot of time doing that. Have you tried
roughage? Has the Lord afflicted your prostate as well as your
colon? For someone who says my preaching is a waste of time, you
can't seem to get enough of it. And get get offended if I don't
respond to the vulgar pro-fornication, pro-sodomy, pro-murder rants of
a senescent curmedgeon.


Jesus saves!

The Realist®

unread,
Sep 21, 2008, 11:28:51 AM9/21/08
to
On Sat, 20 Sep 2008 12:45:16 -0400, "robw" <nodd...@comcast.net>
wrote:

>Yeah., it is a big whoop.
>
>Why isn't the girl married?
>She's five months along.

Did you ask the same question of Obama's mother, since she was 17 and
unmarried when she had him? Oh I'm sorry-I forgot the rules are
different when you are a demon-rat

>But Mommy gets the VP nod and all of a sudden the little slut is going to
>marry a guy who said he didn't want kids.

Too freakin" bad ain't it? He shoulda thought of that before he dipped
his stick. Same goes for the rest of you with the "whoops, I
accidentally created a life, now I'll murder it" crowd.

Furthermore, this idea, that somehow because you raise your children
"religious" that it's a 150% guarantee they won't do things that the
rest of kids do...is frankly ludicrous. Does it help? Sure. Is it a
guarantee? No way. Death and taxes-those are the only things
guaranteed in life (and we can thank you dems for most of the taxes)


>McPerky is a hypocritical twat and we're going to rip her.

LOL...hah hah hah...so far nobody's impressed-please do try harder.

(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) -- NO FACTS Support the RRR Cult's Loathsome Agendas!

unread,
Sep 21, 2008, 12:29:15 PM9/21/08
to
On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 06:53:45 -0700 (PDT),
Cousin Purlean Huggins (aka M-F) (aka Max)
<pur...@wowmail.com>...

... had NOTHING sensibel to say, as usual.

A total waste of time.

Cousin Purlean Huggins

unread,
Sep 21, 2008, 3:54:05 PM9/21/08
to
On Sep 21, 8:28�am, The Realist� <tr...@hurts.com> wrote:

> Did you ask the same question of Obama's mother,

We would have -- but she's been in hell for over a decade. She lived
fast and died young.

> since she was 17 and unmarried when she had him?

That's not correct. She was eighteen when she found out she was
pregnant. She did the right thing and married Barack Sr. seven months
before she gave birth -- even though they were of different races and
shouldn't have been fornicating. Although the two were woefully
mismatched, she did the right thing by getting married and not
murdering her unborn child. She'd heard rumors that Black men were
bigger in the britches and obviously wanted to find our for sure. She
did -- but beyond that had nothing to base a relationship on. I call
that wanton lust.

> Oh I'm sorry - I forgot the rules are different when you are a demon-rat

The Republic-cons can bend the rules just as far. That's why what we
really need in this country is a Holy Theocracy based squarely on the
Holy Bible.

> Too f****in['] bad[,] ain't it? He shoulda thought of that before he dipped


> his stick. Same goes for the rest of you with the "whoops, I
> accidentally created a life, now I'll murder it" crowd.

Old Craig Chilton feels that way. He'll spend eternity stewing in a
huge cauldron of molten lava. Since he encourages young women to
murder their unwanted children, I wonder if he thinks that lustful Ann
Dunham should have murdered Barack Obama II before he was born. The
pro-abortion crowd is always hypocritical.

> Furthermore, this idea, that somehow because you raise your children
> "religious" that it's a 150% guarantee they won't do things that the
> rest of kids do...is frankly ludicrous.

No one ever said there was a 150% guarantee, but it is important to
keep children away from evil influences. A True Christian mother
wouldn't allow her daughter to date the kind of bum who impregnated
Bristol Palin. A True Christian wouldn't give her child such a
bizarre name, either, for that matter. A child brought up with the
proper values would not have engaged in fornication at age 17.
Mothers under 18 can still be sent to Church-run homes for wayward
girls, punished, publically shamed, and then separated from the
children they can't hope to provide for -- who will then be placed in
True Christian homes with financially stable foster parents who can
care for them properly. Our Church supports imposing sterilization
and clitoridectomy on incorrigible fornicators. Their sin makes them
and their children ritually impure.

> Does it help? Sure.

So does strong discipline and tough love. Sarah Palin was too busy
with her wicked political ambitions to take proper care of her
children. She hired nanies to pamper them.

> Is it a guarantee? No way.

Not always -- but True Believers can always count on God's blessings.
When God smites a 50-year-old woman with cancer of the cervix, you can
bet He's cursing her for misusing her body. I hope Sarah Palin has
regular Pap smears.

> Death and taxes - those are the only things guaranteed in life

True Believers will be raptured into heaven -- and God's True Churches
qualify for tax exemptions.

> (and we can thank you dems for most of the taxes)

I'm not a Democrat. I do believe that if taxes are reduced, more
vagrants will roam the streets begging for handouts and break into
cars to have a bed for the night. We need to send the foreigners home
so we can better house, feed, educate, and gainfully employ our own
people. We also need to thin out the enormous prison population in
this country by using tried-and-true methods to deter crime -- public
floggings, canings, scouragings, dunkings, beheadings, stonings,
hangings, electrocutions, and witchburnings -- all televised in HD 3D
in prime time Sunday through Thursday.

> LOL...hah hah hah...so far nobody's impressed - please do try harder.

Sarah Palin is popular in spite of her wickedness. Bill Clinton may
proposition her if she ever makes it to the White House. She looks
like his kind of woman. She's just a few years older than Monica
Blewinsky, who was always trying to look like a chubby "That Girl."


Praying for all sinners,


Cousin Purlean Huggins
Your Heavenly Connection

[The foregoing sermon has the Jesus Christ Seal of Approval.]

Cousin Purlean Huggins

unread,
Sep 21, 2008, 3:56:07 PM9/21/08
to
On Sep 21, 9:29�am, "(�`�.�Craig Chilton�.���) -- NO FACTS Support

the RRR Cult's Loathsome Agendas!" <xanadu2...@mchsi.com> wrote:

> <flush>

Isn't it time for your Preparation-H treatment? Or have you switched
to Anusol?


Jesus saves sinners just like you!

(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) -- NO FACTS Support the RRR Cult's Loathsome Agendas!

unread,
Sep 21, 2008, 5:51:40 PM9/21/08
to
On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 12:56:07 -0700 (PDT),
Cousin Purlean Huggins (aka M-F) (aka Max)
<pur...@wowmail.com>...

... STILL had NOTHING sensibel to say, as usual.

STILL a total waste of time.

Cousin Purlean Huggins

unread,
Sep 21, 2008, 7:18:55 PM9/21/08
to
On Sep 21, 2:51�pm, "(�`�.�Craig Chilton�.���) -- NO FACTS Support

the RRR Cult's Loathsome Agendas!" <xanadu2...@mchsi.com> wrote:

> � �NOTHING sensibel

Really literate of you there, old codger.

> � �STILL a total waste of time.

And yet you can't resist responding. Do you fantasize about my
curvaceous young body, too?

> <flush>

Have you tried Metamucil for your irregularity issues?


I'll pray for you,

(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) -- NO FACTS Support the RRR Cult's Loathsome Agendas!

unread,
Sep 21, 2008, 8:05:42 PM9/21/08
to
On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 16:18:55 -0700 (PDT),
<pur...@wowmail.com>...

... STILL had NOTHING sensible to say, as usual.

STILL a total waste of time.

<flush>

Bill Baker

unread,
Sep 27, 2008, 2:05:48 AM9/27/08
to
On Friday September 19 2008 21:27, Cousin Purlean Huggins
<pur...@wowmail.com> wrote in message
news:<98c913a5-26e0-4f3d...@i20g2000prf.googlegroups.com>

> On Sep 17, 10:01am, Bill Baker <wba...@postini.spamcon.org> wrote:
>
> I can see you're still having trouble digesting the facts, Bill. Let
> me reiterate them for you:
>
> 1) No one in God's One True Church worships Satan.

Except that you do.

> 2) No one in God's One True Church talks to Satan.

Except when you pray to him.

> 3) No one in God's One True Church does Satan's bidding.

Except when you post here.

> 4) No one in God's One True Church ever prays to Satan.

Given the past three points, I can only assume that you do, in fact, pray to
Satan.

> 5) You, Bill Baker, have blasphemed both the Holy Spirit and Saint
> Mary. Therefore:
>
> 6) YOU serve the devil. YOU are evil. And YOU will burn in hell for
> all eternity.

That's what Satan wants you to believe.

>> Then why do you make excuses for him?
>
> Him

That's what I said, him.

>> Because you worship Satan, that's why.
>
> Refer to Fact 1 above.

Refer to my answer to "Fact" 1 above.

>> You'll forgive me
>
> How can I? You've committed the Unforgivable Sin!

True, you do worship Satan.

>> if I don't take the word of a known Satan worshiper like
>> you.
>
> Refer to Fact 1 above again.

Refer to my answer to "Fact" 1 above again.

>> That's what Satan's interpretation of the Bible says.
>
> No. Satan's "interpretation" of the Holy Bible teaches that even
> Godless uncircumcised blasphemers of the Holy Spirit will be saved.

That's what Satan wants you to believe.

> True Believers like me know that unrepentant sinners will suffer


> eternal torment in the fires of hell. We will look on from on high
> and praise God for justice done as you weep and wail and gnash your
> teeth forever. Hallelujah!

More proof that you worship Satan and that your words to the contrary are
lies.

>> See? You're just going by Satan's interpretation.
>
> NO. That's exactly what the Bible says. What do you think those Holy
> Words mean? That you'll have free barbecued ribs forever?

I think that Satan interprets the Bible for you.

>> Is that what Satan told you when you prayed to him?
>
> Refer to Fact 4 above.

Refer to my answer to "Fact" 4 above.

>> That's what Satan wants you to believe.
>
> No. Satan wants us to believe the same silly lies he's convinced you
> to believe. We refuse.

That's because you worship Satan.

>> You're the one who is speaking Satan's words every time you post.
>
> You are literally filled with confusion.

No, I'm not confused at all about your Satan worship.

>> I am. It looks fine to me.
>
> It sounds disgusting to me.

That's your problem, not mine.

>> You're the one who brought it up when it was completely unrelated to the
>> subject.
>
> The electrodes that Satan implanted in you are germane to the subject
> of which of us really serves the devil. You do. I don't.

Every time you say that you don't worship Satan, you're lying.

>> See? You can't stop thinking about it.
>
> That was just a simple question.

I'm sure.

> Our Brother Phinehas was watching a homo-sexual movie the other day

Typical of the dirty old Satan worshipers of your church.

> that involved anilingus -- as most of them do in one form or another. I
> was just innocently wondering whether the experience was anything like
> that for you. How could anybody do such a thing, especially with a lot of
> hair in the way?

To each his or her own, I guess. If you're into that sort of thing, you
won't mind all that hair.

>> Proved by who? Your Satanic cult?
>
> I'm not part of any cult, Satanic or otherwise. Your confusion is
> showing again.

So in other words, your answer is yes.

>> Go ahead and try to find a post of mine that says that.
>
> I'm paraphrasing -- but don't you?

When did I even say I had experienced it? You're not paraphrasing, you're
lying.

>> God obviously has no problem with some people not being normal, since he
>
> He

Yes, he.

>> created so many variations on normalcy, including homosexuality.
>
> No. Satan unleashed that sexual perversion in the world to thwart
> God's special family plan for us all.

That's what Satan wants you to believe.

>> Only Satan wants to make people think God wants everyone normal and


>> boring so that they turn away from God.
>
> God doesn't want anything to be boring. The trouble is that sinners
> like you easily tire of doing good and consequently turn to evil.

And that's exactly what Satan wants people like you to believe.

>> I just did. Every single one of them.
>
> The coming Holy Black Theocracy will never fail.

True, those things that don't exist can't fail.

>> See what I mean?
>
> Holy Queen Henrietta will do what King Saul did not and obliterate all
> pagan influence from the world.

Then she'll have to kill everyone but herself.

>> They would just do those things under the worship of something different,
>> like maybe the Super Devil.
>
> No devil can gain even a modest foothold in a Holy Theocracy.

Why should I believe that when Satan has obviously taken a strong foothold
in your church?

>> I'm sure that's what Satan tells you when you pray to him.
>
> Refer to Fact 4 above.

Refer to my answer to "Fact" 4 above.

>> More proof that you worship Satan.
>
> How so? I didnt blaspheme anyone. You did. You're also
> uncircumcised. God is disgusted with your foul-smelling penis.

Satan is in love with your lies.

>> Make me.
>
> I don't make trash. I burn it.

So when did you burn yourself?

>> Make me.
>
> If you want to go through life being thought ignorant, who am I to
> interfere?

Except you keep trying to get me to believe your ignorance and are
constantly interfering to do that.

>> Make me.
>
> See above.

See my response to above.

>> You mean one of your Satan worshiping quack so-called "doctors?"
>
> No. I mean a bona fide faith healer.

That's what I said, your Satan worshiping quack so-called "doctors."

>> Because no real doctor would ever find such a thing.
>
> given half a chance, Dr. Tucker could easily find several implants in
> your rectum and colon.

I'm sure he'd try to put his tongue, several fingers and even his penis in
there if I let him.

>> Make me.
>
> Change the record.

You first.

>> That's Satan in disguise.
>
> I can tell the difference even if you can't. The Lord performs
> miracles. Satan can only make empty promises.

Which is proof that you worship Satan in disguise.

>> I'm sure Satan gives you that power over stupid and gullible people.
>
> I have to go gt ready for tonight's witch hunt.

More Satanic rituals. I'm sure you'd get along fine with Sarah Palin's
pastor, Rev. Muthee.

> Dr. Tucker is going to name names and send dozens of hypocrites on a long
> guilt trip.

Thus proving that only stupid and/or gullible people listen to him.

> I'm sad that you couldn't have contributed something tangible to our cause
> -- something like $1,000. Oh well... You'll get yours on Judgment Day.

I'm sure Satan tells you that when you pray to him.

--
Bushism 8-9:
"The war on terror involves Saddam Hussein because of the nature of Saddam
Hussein, the history of Saddam Hussein, and his willingness to terrorize
himself."
--Grand Rapids, Michigan; January 29, 2002

Cousin Purlean Huggins

unread,
Sep 28, 2008, 9:38:07 PM9/28/08
to
On Sep 26, 11:05 pm, Bill Baker <wba...@postini.spamcon.org> wrote:

I see you're STILL having trouble facing basic facts. That's because
you've got demons inside you struggling to make you sin more and
more. I can't help you until you agree to see a bona fide exorcist
about your problem. I can only reiterate the FACTS that you keep
ignoring.

1) No one in God's One True Church worships Satan.

> Except that you do.

No, I don't. You can't prove that I or anyone else in our Church has
EVER worshiped Satan. You seem to be confused about what a devil
worshiper even is. Anton Szandor LaVey was a genuine Satanist, as are
Michael Aquino, Peter Gilmore, and Blanche Barton today. You have far
more in common with them than I do. You even excuse their
wickedness. Satan controls YOU, not me.

2) No one in God's One True Church talks to Satan.

> Except when you pray to him.

No. Never. No one in our Church EVER talks to Satan or prays to
Satan. You do Satan's bidding, so it's obvious that you act out
scripts he provides for you. No one in our Church does. We do good
deeds. We cast out demons. We heal the sick. We cleanse the
lepers. We correct wrongdoing. We circumcised smegmatic men.

3) No one in God's One True Church does Satan's bidding.

> Except when you post here.

No. Never. YOU serve the devil. I don't.

4) No one in God's One True Church ever prays to Satan.

> Given the past three points, I can only assume that you do, in fact, pray to
> Satan.

Your ASS-umption, as usual, is totally off base. You have been fooled
by the devil!

> That's what Satan wants you to believe.

No. The Bible says blasphemers of the Holy Spirit can't be forgiven.
Therefore you must burn for all eternity in the Pit of Perdition.
There's nothing I can do to change that fact. Maybe if you plead
insanity to the Lord and donate ALL your worldly goods to our Church
that will help you a little.

> That's what I said, him.

God notes your disrespect of His Holy Name and Holy Attributes.
Further disobedience will only make the fires of hell hotter for you
in the hereafter.

> Refer to my answer to "Fact" 1 above.

Your "answers" are nothing but lies from hell!

> True, you do worship Satan.

No, I do not. You SERVE the devil in all you do. You are evil!

> Refer to my answer to "Fact" 1 above again.

Why? It's just another lie. You admit you lie. Do you ever tell the
truth?

> That's what Satan wants you to believe.

No. Satan has duped you, not me. I am free from the devil's evil
influence.

> More proof that you worship Satan and that your words to the contrary are
> lies.

Proof how? The Bible says the wicked must suffer. You are wicked --
exceedingly so -- therefore you must suffer. Only Satan would try to
convince you that you can get off the hook through good intentions --
not that you have many of those anyway. Your heart is very obviously
filled with evil designs and fantasies.

> I think that Satan interprets the Bible for you.

You think wrong as usual. Satan possesses YOU, not me.

> Refer to my answer to "Fact" 4 above.

Give me even one compelling reason why I should trust the word of an
admiited liar?
You're not even circumcised, and we all know what that means. P-ew!

> That's because you worship Satan.

No, I don't. I resisted his temptation. You fell right into his
trap.

> No, I'm not confused at all about your Satan worship.

You're confused about everything. You don't know which end is up.
You think your own anus is an entrance rather than an exit. That's
how the demons got in to take possession of you.

> That's your problem, not mine.

Ultimately it's your problem. You will suffer because of it -- just
as others suffer because of your smegmatic buildup.

> Every time you say that you don't worship Satan, you're lying.

That's a lie. I'd like to see you try to prove empirically that I've
EVER had any dealings with the devil. You can't. Those are your own
wicked assumptions, nothing more.

> I'm sure.

But you didn't answer it. Most gay men shave their butt cracks. Only
the so-called "bears" don't. Is that what you are?

> Typical of the dirty old Satan worshipers of your church.

There are NO Satan worshipers in our Holy Church. Only the truly
Godly attend. It's Brother Phinehas's job to review pornographic
videos to determine how much harm they're doing to society. He hates
them all with a passion. That's why we burn them after he logs his
review.

> To each his or her own, I guess. If you're into that sort of thing, you
> won't mind all that hair.

Only if you're totally depraved, I'd say. Anilingus is thoroughly
degrading and sick.

> So in other words, your answer is yes.

No -- because I don't belong to any cult. God's One True Church has
proved that homo-sexuals can't love.

> When did I even say I had experienced it? You're not paraphrasing, you're
> lying.

What do you mean "lying"? I don't lie. You've admitted that you lie
with some frequency. You must be confused again. Do you take any
sort of medication when this brain fog of yours starts to roll in?
Anyway, you wrote that you believed a man's prostate is one penis's
length inside his rectum. I can't imagine ANY straight man who either
hadn't had a penis up his rectum or put his penis up another man's
rectum ever thinking such a thing. I hear that homo-sexuals use
anilingus to pave the way for anal assault. Is that true?

> Yes, he.

Decent people capitalize pronouns referring to the Deity. The fact
that you don't proves that you're a child of hell! You don't just
worship the devil -- you're in bed with him.

> That's what Satan wants you to believe.

No. That's what Almighty God revealed to us through His Word.

> And that's exactly what Satan wants people like you to believe.

That's impossible. I do good deeds all day. I genuinely help people
who need help. You do nothing but cause trouble and stir up doubt.
You also have smegma whether you're willing to believe it or not.

> True, those things that don't exist can't fail.

But Holy Black Theocracy is coming soon.

> Then she'll have to kill everyone but herself.

Why? There are very few pagans in this country today. There will
still be freedom of religion -- as long as people select from a short
list of approved religions.

> Why should I believe that when Satan has obviously taken a strong foothold
> in your church?

He hasn't. You're just confused. What you in your deep ignorance
perceive as the devil really isn't the devil at all.

> Refer to my answer to "Fact" 4 above.

Why? It's a total lie.

> Satan is in love with your lies.

What lies? Satan hates all humanity. He's only using you to spread
evil. And smegma too, naturally.

> So when did you burn yourself?

Never. I'm not trash. Jesus saved me. He rejected you after your
evil blasphemy. That's when the devil completely possessed you --
first anally, then completely. He may have started with his long,
snake-like tongue. Being a pervert, you probably loved the sensation.

> Except you keep trying to get me to believe your ignorance

I'm not ignorant. You are confused.

> and are constantly interfering to do that.

Interfering how? I only come to New Sodom once a year. I don't stop
you from going to gay bars and sex clubs or black masses wherever it
is you live, do I?

> See my response to above.

It was typically Satanic.

> That's what I said, your Satan worshiping quack so-called "doctors."

We are true healers. Most so-called doctors are nothing more than
drug pushers for Big Pharma.

> I'm sure he'd try to put his tongue, several fingers and even his penis in
> there if I let him.

You are TOTALLY perverted to have such sick fantasies about a True
Christian! Dr. Tucker would NEVER do such horrible things. He uses
forceps to extract demons. He absolutely NEVER makes any sort of
sexual contact with men. His seed is too pure for that.

> You first.

My preaching is always fresh. I don't need to repeat myself like a
constipated parrot.

> Which is proof that you worship Satan in disguise.

No! The Lord always performs real miracles when He appears at our
Church. Last Sunday He moved scores of people to confess hidden sins
during our witch hunt. There was a huge revival after all was
revealed. Those who refused to repent were cast out and their assets
seized by the Church.

> More Satanic rituals.

How can it be Satanic? It's sanctioned in the Book of Acts?

> I'm sure you'd get along fine with Sarah Palin's pastor, Rev. Muthee.

Do you mean BISHOP Muthee of Kenya? He's not Sister Sarah's pastor
per se, but he is right about the influence of witches on the lives of
the masses. There are a not of pagan nature worshipers in Alaska, so
he was right to go there and pray for Sister Sarah. I'm still not
terribly impressed with her or her family. Since her liberal
parenting allowed her daughter to fall into fornication, I think she'd
be another Dick Cheney if she found herself in the White House. God
cursed his family as well, you'll recall. I can't imagine her
involved in making serious foreign policy decisions either.

> Thus proving that only stupid and/or gullible people listen to him.

No. Highly intelligent people take his advice every day.

> I'm sure Satan tells you that when you pray to him.

I NEVER pray to Satan. The Bible says sinners must burn forever.
That means YOU!

> "The war on terror involves Saddam Hussein because of the nature of Saddam
> Hussein, the history of Saddam Hussein, and his willingness to terrorize
> himself."

Do you think George W. Bush had an orgasm when Saddam Hussein was
hanged? We call such things wargasms -- sexual thrills derived from
mass murder andf mayhem during wartime.


Rebuking sinners every day,

Bill Baker

unread,
Oct 1, 2008, 3:11:27 AM10/1/08
to
On Sunday September 28 2008 21:38, Cousin Purlean Huggins
<pur...@wowmail.com> wrote in message
news:<4069c096-da58-49c8...@c22g2000prc.googlegroups.com>

> On Sep 26, 11:05 pm, Bill Baker <wba...@postini.spamcon.org> wrote:
>
> I see you're STILL having trouble facing basic facts.

Not at all. I have no trouble refuting false "facts," either.

> That's because you've got demons inside you struggling to make you sin
> more and more.

What sort of sins are they causing me to commit? Be specific.

> I can't help you until you agree to see a bona fide exorcist about your
> problem.

I have no problem seeing the fact that you worship Satan.

> I can only reiterate the FACTS that you keep ignoring.

All I see from you are lies from Satan.

>>> 1) No one in God's One True Church worships Satan.
>
>> Except that you do.
>
> No, I don't.

Yes, you do.

> You can't prove that I or anyone else in our Church has EVER worshiped
> Satan.

You can't prove that you haven't. I see your words that you write and they
look exactly like words Satan would write.

> You seem to be confused about what a devil worshiper even is.

Not at all. I just have a different definition from you Satan-worshipers.

> Anton Szandor LaVey was a genuine Satanist, as are Michael Aquino, Peter
> Gilmore, and Blanche Barton today. You have far more in common with them
> than I do. You even excuse their wickedness. Satan controls YOU, not me.

That's what Satan tells you when you pray to him.

>>> 2) No one in God's One True Church talks to Satan.
>
>> Except when you pray to him.
>
> No. Never. No one in our Church EVER talks to Satan or prays to
> Satan.

Except that you do.

> You do Satan's bidding, so it's obvious that you act out scripts he
> provides for you.

That's what Satan tells you.

> No one in our Church does. We do good deeds. We cast out demons. We
> heal the sick. We cleanse the lepers. We correct wrongdoing. We
> circumcised smegmatic men.

See? You worship Satan.

>>> 3) No one in God's One True Church does Satan's bidding.
>
>> Except when you post here.
>
> No. Never. YOU serve the devil. I don't.

Yes, you do.

>>> 4) No one in God's One True Church ever prays to Satan.
>
>> Given the past three points, I can only assume that you do, in fact, pray
>> to Satan.
>
> Your ASS-umption, as usual, is totally off base. You have been fooled
> by the devil!

I haven't, but you sure have.

>> That's what Satan wants you to believe.
>
> No.

Yes.

> The Bible says blasphemers of the Holy Spirit can't be forgiven.
> Therefore you must burn for all eternity in the Pit of Perdition.
> There's nothing I can do to change that fact. Maybe if you plead
> insanity to the Lord and donate ALL your worldly goods to our Church
> that will help you a little.

That's what Satan wants you to believe.

>> That's what I said, him.


>
> God notes your disrespect of His Holy Name and Holy Attributes.
> Further disobedience will only make the fires of hell hotter for you
> in the hereafter.

Should I say "her?"

>> Refer to my answer to "Fact" 1 above.
>
> Your "answers" are nothing but lies from hell!

That's what Satan wants you to believe.

>> True, you do worship Satan.


>
> No, I do not. You SERVE the devil in all you do. You are evil!

You serve the devil in all you write.

>> Refer to my answer to "Fact" 1 above again.
>
> Why? It's just another lie. You admit you lie. Do you ever tell the
> truth?

Yes, every time I say that you worship Satan.

>> That's what Satan wants you to believe.
>
> No. Satan has duped you, not me. I am free from the devil's evil
> influence.

That's what Satan wants you to believe.

>> More proof that you worship Satan and that your words to the contrary are


>> lies.
>
> Proof how? The Bible says the wicked must suffer. You are wicked --
> exceedingly so -- therefore you must suffer.

That's what Satan wants you to believe.

> Only Satan would try to convince you that you can get off the hook through


> good intentions -- not that you have many of those anyway. Your heart is
> very obviously filled with evil designs and fantasies.

Only Satan would try to convince you that there is no point in having good
intentions and that what you believe is all that matters.

>> I think that Satan interprets the Bible for you.
>
> You think wrong as usual. Satan possesses YOU, not me.

That's what Satan wants you to think.

>> Refer to my answer to "Fact" 4 above.
>
> Give me even one compelling reason why I should trust the word of an
> admiited liar?

Because that means I admit when I lie, which means I am honest.

> You're not even circumcised, and we all know what that means. P-ew!

You, on the other hand, lie continuously, which you just demonstrated.

>> That's because you worship Satan.
>
> No, I don't. I resisted his temptation. You fell right into his
> trap.

That's what Satan wants you to believe.

>> No, I'm not confused at all about your Satan worship.


>
> You're confused about everything.

Not about your Satan worship.

> You don't know which end is up. You think your own anus is an entrance
> rather than an exit.

Do I? When did I say that?

> That's how the demons got in to take possession of you.

Is that what Satan tells you when you pray to him?

>> That's your problem, not mine.
>
> Ultimately it's your problem. You will suffer because of it -- just
> as others suffer because of your smegmatic buildup.

So I won't suffer at all.

>> Every time you say that you don't worship Satan, you're lying.
>
> That's a lie.

Yes, that's a lie when you say you don't worship Satan.

> I'd like to see you try to prove empirically that I've EVER had any
> dealings with the devil. You can't. Those are your own wicked
> assumptions, nothing more.

As soon as you prove empirically that your evil god is real and hates
homosexuality without using any verse from the Bible.

>> I'm sure.
>
> But you didn't answer it. Most gay men shave their butt cracks. Only
> the so-called "bears" don't. Is that what you are?

I don't put myself into categories. I am me.

>> Typical of the dirty old Satan worshipers of your church.
>
> There are NO Satan worshipers in our Holy Church. Only the truly
> Godly attend.

Only if your "God" is Satan.

> It's Brother Phinehas's job to review pornographic videos to determine how
> much harm they're doing to society. He hates them all with a passion.

Sure he does.

> That's why we burn them after he logs his review.

He burns in lust, you mean.

>> To each his or her own, I guess. If you're into that sort of thing, you
>> won't mind all that hair.
>
> Only if you're totally depraved, I'd say. Anilingus is thoroughly
> degrading and sick.

Not if you're into that sort of thing.

>> So in other words, your answer is yes.
>
> No -- because I don't belong to any cult. God's One True Church has
> proved that homo-sexuals can't love.

So in other words, your Satanic cult has lied again.

>> When did I even say I had experienced it? You're not paraphrasing,
>> you're lying.
>
> What do you mean "lying"?

The opposite of telling the truth.

> I don't lie.

Except when you post here.

> You've admitted that you lie with some frequency.

Which makes me more honest than you; you refuse to admit you lie at all.

> You must be confused again.

I'm not confused at all about your Satan worship.

> Do you take any sort of medication when this brain fog of yours starts to
> roll in?

I don't take any medication at all. My mind is perfectly clear when I
discern your lies and Satan worship.

> Anyway, you wrote that you believed a man's prostate is one penis's
> length inside his rectum.

It's not a matter of belief, it's right there. As if men were *designed*
for anal sex!

> I can't imagine ANY straight man who either hadn't had a penis up his
> rectum or put his penis up another man's rectum ever thinking such a
> thing. I hear that homo-sexuals use anilingus to pave the way for anal
> assault. Is that true?

For some, probably.

>> Yes, he.
>
> Decent people capitalize pronouns referring to the Deity. The fact
> that you don't proves that you're a child of hell! You don't just
> worship the devil -- you're in bed with him.

I'm sure that's what Satan tells you every time you pray to him.

>> That's what Satan wants you to believe.
>
> No. That's what Almighty God revealed to us through His Word.

...as interpreted by Satan, of course.

>> And that's exactly what Satan wants people like you to believe.
>
> That's impossible.

No, it's very possible.

> I do good deeds all day. I genuinely help people who need help.

So do I.

> You do nothing but cause trouble and stir up doubt.

That's what Satan wants you to think.

> You also have smegma whether you're willing to believe it or not.

Even if that were true, which it isn't, there's nothing in the Bible against
having smegma.

>> True, those things that don't exist can't fail.
>
> But Holy Black Theocracy is coming soon.

Like I said, things that don't exist can't fail.

>> Then she'll have to kill everyone but herself.
>
> Why? There are very few pagans in this country today. There will
> still be freedom of religion -- as long as people select from a short
> list of approved religions.

Which means she'll pretty much have to kill everyone but herself.

>> Why should I believe that when Satan has obviously taken a strong
>> foothold in your church?
>
> He hasn't. You're just confused. What you in your deep ignorance
> perceive as the devil really isn't the devil at all.

That's what Satan wants you to think.

>> Refer to my answer to "Fact" 4 above.
>
> Why? It's a total lie.

Yes, your "Facts" are total lies. If I was telling a lie, however, I would
admit it.

>> Satan is in love with your lies.
>
> What lies? Satan hates all humanity. He's only using you to spread
> evil. And smegma too, naturally.

Satan has convinced you of that.

>> So when did you burn yourself?
>
> Never. I'm not trash. Jesus saved me.

Then why do you worship Satan?

> He rejected you after your evil blasphemy. That's when the devil
> completely possessed you -- first anally, then completely. He may have
> started with his long, snake-like tongue. Being a pervert, you probably
> loved the sensation.

I'm sure that's what Satan told you when you prayed to him.

>> Except you keep trying to get me to believe your ignorance
>
> I'm not ignorant. You are confused.

I'm not confused at all about your ignorance or your Satan worship.

>> and are constantly interfering to do that.
>
> Interfering how? I only come to New Sodom once a year. I don't stop
> you from going to gay bars and sex clubs or black masses wherever it
> is you live, do I?

You attempt to dupe me with your obvious lies from Satan.

>> See my response to above.
>
> It was typically Satanic.

I'm sure that's what Satan told you when you prayed to him.

>> That's what I said, your Satan worshiping quack so-called "doctors."
>
> We are true healers. Most so-called doctors are nothing more than
> drug pushers for Big Pharma.

So I was right, your Satan worshiping quack so-called "doctors."

>> I'm sure he'd try to put his tongue, several fingers and even his penis
>> in there if I let him.
>
> You are TOTALLY perverted to have such sick fantasies about a True
> Christian! Dr. Tucker would NEVER do such horrible things. He uses
> forceps to extract demons. He absolutely NEVER makes any sort of
> sexual contact with men. His seed is too pure for that.

I'm sure that's the lie you tell people to get them in the door.

>> You first.
>
> My preaching is always fresh. I don't need to repeat myself like a
> constipated parrot.

Then why are you constantly repeating yourself like a "constipated parrot?"

>> Which is proof that you worship Satan in disguise.
>
> No!

Yes!

> The Lord always performs real miracles when He appears at our Church.
> Last Sunday He moved scores of people to confess hidden sins during our
> witch hunt. There was a huge revival after all was revealed. Those who
> refused to repent were cast out and their assets seized by the Church.

Yet more proof that you worship Satan in disguise.

>> More Satanic rituals.
>
> How can it be Satanic? It's sanctioned in the Book of Acts?

That you think it is proves that you worship Satan.

>> I'm sure you'd get along fine with Sarah Palin's pastor, Rev. Muthee.
>
> Do you mean BISHOP Muthee of Kenya? He's not Sister Sarah's pastor
> per se, but he is right about the influence of witches on the lives of
> the masses. There are a not of pagan nature worshipers in Alaska, so
> he was right to go there and pray for Sister Sarah.

Which just proves that both you and he worship Satan.

> I'm still not terribly impressed with her or her family. Since her
> liberal parenting allowed her daughter to fall into fornication,

Conservative parenting is much more likely to turn out promiscuous children.

> I think she'd be another Dick Cheney if she found herself in the White
> House. God cursed his family as well, you'll recall. I can't imagine her
> involved in making serious foreign policy decisions either.

She won't have to, especially since she probably won't win in November.

>> Thus proving that only stupid and/or gullible people listen to him.
>
> No. Highly intelligent people take his advice every day.

Thus proving you have a very strange definition of "highly intelligent" to
include stupid and/or gullible people.

>> I'm sure Satan tells you that when you pray to him.
>
> I NEVER pray to Satan.

That's what Satan wants you to believe.

> The Bible says sinners must burn forever. That means YOU!

I'm sure Satan tells you that whenever you pray to him.

>> "The war on terror involves Saddam Hussein because of the nature of
>> Saddam Hussein, the history of Saddam Hussein, and his willingness to
>> terrorize himself."
>
> Do you think George W. Bush had an orgasm when Saddam Hussein was
> hanged? We call such things wargasms -- sexual thrills derived from
> mass murder andf mayhem during wartime.

I don't care to think about Bush's sexual feelings.

--
Bushism 7-7:
"I glance at the headlines just to kind of get a flavor for what's moving.
I rarely read the stories, and get briefed by people who probably read the
news themselves."
--Washington, D.C.; September 21, 2003

Cousin Purlean Huggins

unread,
Oct 3, 2008, 2:00:18 AM10/3/08
to
On Oct 1, 12:11 am, Bill Baker <wba...@postini.spamcon.org> wrote:

> Not at all. I have no trouble refuting false "facts," either.

I only preach True Facts. The Gospel is the irrefutable Truth of
God. You can't be saved. You will never go to heaven. Therefore
you're evil and serve the devil. I resist the devil and thwart his
sinful designs every hour.

> What sort of sins are they causing me to commit? Be specific.

Blasphemy. Irreverence. Tolerance of sexual depravity. Oral sodomy.
Rebellion against God's law and God's Truth.

> I have no problem seeing the fact that you worship Satan.

If that's what you see, you are totally delusional. Satan is in
control of your soul. You have dedicated it to evil.

> All I see from you are lies from Satan.

What lie have I told? My baby cousin Lurlean may exaggerate a little,
but I never do.

1) No one in God's One True Church worships Satan.

> Yes, you do.

How can I worship the devil if I always pray the Lord's Prayer in
Jesus' Name? I have never knelt down in front of a pentagram or
invoked the devil. Instead I cast demons out of people. I don't
think you know the difference between good and evil.

> You can't prove that you haven't. I see your words that you write and they
> look exactly like words Satan would write.

What makes you say that? I NEVER quote from the Satanic "bible" or
any of the Satanic scriptures. Can you give me some examples of
unequivocally Satanic writing that any reasonable person could
identify as such?

> Not at all. I just have a different definition from you Satan-worshipers.

I don't worship Satan. Where can I find a rational definition of what
a real Satan worshiper is? Peter Gilmore and Blanche Barton offer a
widely accepted definition that you reject. Why? Do you believe any
reasonable person would consider me a devil worshiper?

> That's what Satan tells you when you pray to him.

When do I pray to Satan? I start off all my prayers, "Our Father" and
end with "Thy Will be done in Jesus' precious Name." In what way are
these prayers directed to Satan? Why is it the True Lord -- never
Satan -- always answers them?

2) No one in God's One True Church talks to Satan.

> Except that you do.

No. You're just wrong. Have you had your head examined recently?
Has a doctor ever told you you'd be better off circumcised?

> That's what Satan tells you.

No. That's what's obvious. Blasphemy, irreverence, and oral sodomy
all tell a tale on you, not me.

> See? You worship Satan.

What brings you to that conclusion? Are you TOTALLY ignorant? Do you
somehow equate circumcision with Satanism? Most Satanists oppose
circumcision. They'be be perfectly happy with your cheesy little
weenie.

3) No one in God's One True Church does Satan's bidding.

> Yes, you do.

No, I don't. You're just confused again. I think that's your natural
state.

4) No one in God's One True Church ever prays to Satan.

> I haven't, but you sure have.

No. The devil crept into your body through your wide-open anus and
took complete possession of your mind and soul.

> Yes.

Satan promulgates lies. He is the father of liars. You admit you
lie, therefore Satan is your spiritual father. True Christians like
me resist Satanic influence.

> That's what Satan wants you to believe.

No. That's your only hope. It's very obvious that you're on the road
to hell right now.

> Should I say "her?"

Only if you want your torment to increase even more. God is Our
Father. He won't hear your prayers no matter what you call Him -- but
He will ease your agony in the lake of Fire IF you're especially nice
to His people -- us.

> That's what Satan wants you to believe.

No. Satan wants me to believe the silly lies you tell. I refuse.
Why do you hate me so much? I'm only trying to help people --
including you -- find happiness through Jesus Christ. It's admittedly
too late for you to reach heaven, but your loneliness and misery can
be reduced a little if you support our efforts to save other sinners.

> You serve the devil in all you write.

How? Who has embraced a Satanic lifestyle after reading one of my
sermons? No one! Usually it's just the opposite that happens. I
preach and sinners repent.

> Yes, every time I say that you worship Satan.

No. That's a total lie. If you really believe that you're
delusional.

> That's what Satan wants you to believe.

It's what's true. You don't know what's true any longer. You've gone
completely insane. I've been told that smegma can do that to you.

> That's what Satan wants you to believe.

That's what the Bible says. Jesus taught us about the burning hell so
we would know it's there. You'll experience its horrors firsthand
before long. Thanks to my preaching, many others will be able to
avoid damnation. Why do you want people to go to hell? So you won't
be lonely there?

> Only Satan would try to convince you that there is no point in having good
> intentions and that what you believe is all that matters.

I never said that. You'll be judged by your actions -- blasphemy,
irreverence, heresy, spite, mockery, oral sodomy, denial, and cheesy
smegmatic buildup.

> That's what Satan wants you to think.

What makes you think so? Is it because you're filled with demons and
can't seem to think straight?

> Because that means I admit when I lie, which means I am honest.

No. If you were truly honest, you wouldn't lie in the first place.

> You, on the other hand, lie continuously, which you just demonstrated.

Continuously? What lie have I told? If you aren't circumcised,
you've got smegma to deal with in some capacity or other. Smegma
stinks. There are no two ways about that.

> That's what Satan wants you to believe.

It's time to change the record, Bill. I think you've gone totally
bonkers.

> Not about your Satan worship.

There is no such thing.

> Do I? When did I say that?

What did you say about a prostate gland's being one penis's length
inside the rectum? I asked three different straight men about that
and they all said you're either crazy or queer. Or both. Isn't your
opinion based at least in part on personal experience?

> Is that what Satan tells you when you pray to him?

I never pray to Satan. I think you know that.

> So I won't suffer at all.

Members of my Church have suffered because of you -- so yes, you will
suffer endless agony in hell.

> Yes, that's a lie when you say you don't worship Satan.

No. As God is my Witness, I have NEVER worshiped Satan.

> As soon as you prove empirically that your evil god

The Creator of Heavena nd Earth is NOT evil. That's proof that you're
deeply confused.

> is real and hates homosexuality without using any verse from the Bible.

God has told me so many times. He hates homo-sexual lust -- but He
loves individual homo-sexuals. He wants to save them from their
sins.

> I don't put myself into categories. I am me.

Other homo-sexuals would put into any number of categories. Some of
them sexualize nerds. Computer geeks can usually think of uncommon
uses for everyday household items. For most homo-sexuals, that means
anal experimentation.

> Only if your "God" is Satan.

No. Our God is the One True Lord. You've blasphemed His Holy Spirit
and the Mother of Jesus Christ.

> Sure he does.

I can assure you he hates his duty of watching filth. Some of the
DVDs he reviews are so disgusting he throws them against the wall
before he's even watched them to the end.

> He burns in lust, you mean.

No. We are beyond that.

> Not if you're into that sort of thing.

I think it's sick no matter who engages in it. It spreads hepatitis,
for one. It can spread other diseases as well.

> So in other words, your Satanic cult has lied again.

I'm not involved in any kind of Satanic cult. Our Church preaches
truth, not lies. It's true that homo-sexuals can't love. They burn
in unnatural lust day and night.

> The opposite of telling the truth.

I ALWAYS tell the truth. How do you know what prostate stimulation
feels like unless you've experienced it?

> Except when you post here.

No. I NEVER lie. You, on the other hand, can't seem to stop lying --
for Lucifer! I'm exactly the opposite -- consistently truthful.

> Which makes me more honest than you;

That's impossible. You lie; I don't.

> you refuse to admit you lie at all.

That's because I don't. You're just confused about the truth. Why
don't you see if getting circumcised helps you with that problem -- as
well as the more obvious one.

> I'm not confused at all about your Satan worship.

You're confused period. It's the devil inside you.

> I don't take any medication at all.

Maybe you should start.

> My mind is perfectly clear when I discern your lies and Satan worship.

If that's what you're "discerning," you're nuts.

> It's not a matter of belief, it's right there.

Only in the opinion of sexual perverts.

> As if men were *designed* for anal sex!

Why is it that straight men don't feel that way?

> For some, probably.

You've admitted to sodomizing someone orally. Have you sodomized
anyone -- male or female -- anally as well?

> I'm sure that's what Satan tells you every time you pray to him.

No. God revealed that Truth to me.

> ...as interpreted by Satan, of course.

No. As interpreted by the Holy Spirit you blaspheme.

> No, it's very possible.

Only in a warped mind like yours that's full of the devil.

> So do I.

You also encourage other people to sin. That's a sure sign of demonic
possession.

> That's what Satan wants you to think.

That's what I can see with my own eyes.

> > You also have smegma whether you're willing to believe it or not.
>
> Even if that were true, which it isn't, there's nothing in the Bible against
> having smegma.

Circumcision is supposed to prevent smegma. It works, too. Get
circumcised and you'll see for yourself.

> Like I said, things that don't exist can't fail.

It is taking shape even now. When the American people see Sarah Palin
sidestep direct questions and play the same old Republican records,
they start thinking that a Holy Theoracy might not be so bad. In fact
it's the only answer.

> Which means she'll pretty much have to kill everyone but herself.

No. Only criminals will be executed.

> That's what Satan wants you to think.

No. That's what Satan already has YOU believing.

> Yes, your "Facts" are total lies.

No. My facts are just that. Your silly retorts are lies from the
devil.

> If I was telling a lie, however, I would admit it.

That still makes you a liar. I'm not a liar.

> Satan has convinced you of that.

All uncircumcised men have smegma issues. You're just in denial about
them.

> Then why do you worship Satan?

Change the record, dodo.

> I'm sure that's what Satan told you when you prayed to him.

I never prayed to Satan. You just invited him in without any sort of
prayer.

> I'm not confused at all about your ignorance or your Satan worship.

Since neither is real, you are DEEPLY confused.

> You attempt to dupe me with your obvious lies from Satan.

I'm trying to warn sensible people not to listen to your filthy lies.
I always preach the Truth.

> I'm sure that's what Satan told you when you prayed to him.

No. I've never prayed to Satan.

> So I was right, your Satan worshiping quack so-called "doctors."

No. I mean true faith healers for Jesus. There are many in our
Church.

> I'm sure that's the lie you tell people to get them in the door.

Then why hasn't anyone EVER complained? You only wish everyone was as
sick and perverted as you are now.

> Then why are you constantly repeating yourself like a "constipated parrot?"

I'm not. That's what you do. You are SERIOUSLY confused. You need
some pain therapy.

> Yes!

No. I worship the Lord Jesus. You're confused. That's why you
blaspheme what is holy.

> Yet more proof that you worship Satan in disguise.

I don't think so. God told us to root out unbelievers. Their assets
be;belong to the Church.

> That you think it is proves that you worship Satan.

Your confusion is showing again.

> Which just proves that both you and he worship Satan.

The fact that he prayed for Sarah Palin? You've got everything
backwards.


I've done enough preaching for today...

Bill Baker

unread,
Oct 12, 2008, 12:09:21 AM10/12/08
to
On Friday October 3 2008 02:00, Cousin Purlean Huggins <pur...@wowmail.com>
wrote in message
news:<d63920d3-1767-4352...@m73g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>

> On Oct 1, 12:11 am, Bill Baker <wba...@postini.spamcon.org> wrote:
>
>> Not at all. I have no trouble refuting false "facts," either.
>
> I only preach True Facts.

There's another lie.

> The Gospel is the irrefutable Truth of God. You can't be saved. You will
> never go to heaven. Therefore you're evil and serve the devil. I resist
> the devil and thwart his sinful designs every hour.

That's what Satan wants you to believe.

>> What sort of sins are they causing me to commit? Be specific.


>
> Blasphemy. Irreverence. Tolerance of sexual depravity. Oral sodomy.
> Rebellion against God's law and God's Truth.

That's what Satan wants you to believe.

>> I have no problem seeing the fact that you worship Satan.


>
> If that's what you see, you are totally delusional. Satan is in
> control of your soul. You have dedicated it to evil.

That's what Satan wants you to believe.

>> All I see from you are lies from Satan.


>
> What lie have I told? My baby cousin Lurlean may exaggerate a little,
> but I never do.

Right, both you and Lurlean lie.

>>> 1) No one in God's One True Church worships Satan.
>
>> Yes, you do.
>
> How can I worship the devil if I always pray the Lord's Prayer in
> Jesus' Name?

Satan can do that in order to fool people.

> I have never knelt down in front of a pentagram or invoked the devil.

That you think that you have to do those things to worship Satan just proves
that Satan has you fooled into worshiping him.

> Instead I cast demons out of people. I don't think you know the
> difference between good and evil.

I do. You worship Satan.

>> You can't prove that you haven't. I see your words that you write and
>> they look exactly like words Satan would write.
>
> What makes you say that? I NEVER quote from the Satanic "bible" or
> any of the Satanic scriptures.

That you think that you have to quote from them to be a Satan worshiper just
proves that Satan has you fooled into worshiping him.

> Can you give me some examples of unequivocally Satanic writing that any
> reasonable person could identify as such?

Your hatred for God's gay children is a dead giveaway.

>> Not at all. I just have a different definition from you
>> Satan-worshipers.
>
> I don't worship Satan. Where can I find a rational definition of what
> a real Satan worshiper is? Peter Gilmore and Blanche Barton offer a
> widely accepted definition that you reject. Why? Do you believe any
> reasonable person would consider me a devil worshiper?

Not until they saw the truth. God reveals truths like that to people in his
own time.

>> That's what Satan tells you when you pray to him.
>
> When do I pray to Satan?

Any time you say a prayer

> I start off all my prayers, "Our Father"

Your father Satan, that is.

> and end with "Thy Will be done in Jesus' precious Name."

Satan will answer to any name if it allows him to fool you.

> In what way are these prayers directed to Satan?

It's all in the intent.

> Why is it the True Lord -- never Satan -- always answers them?

That's what Satan wants you to believe.

>>> 2) No one in God's One True Church talks to Satan.


>
>> Except that you do.
>
> No. You're just wrong.

I'm sure you believe that. But only because Satan wants you to.

> Have you had your head examined recently? Has a doctor ever told you
> you'd be better off circumcised?

I see Satan wants to distract you from the truth by putting those questions
into your head.

>> That's what Satan tells you.
>
> No. That's what's obvious. Blasphemy, irreverence, and oral sodomy
> all tell a tale on you, not me.

That's what Satan wants you to believe.

>> See? You worship Satan.


>
> What brings you to that conclusion?

The actions you claim to engage in.

> Are you TOTALLY ignorant?

No, I am perfectly aware of your Satan worship.

> Do you somehow equate circumcision with Satanism?

No, just your obsession with it.

> Most Satanists oppose circumcision. They'be be perfectly happy with your
> cheesy little weenie.

More distractions from Satan.

>>> 3) No one in God's One True Church does Satan's bidding.
>
>> Yes, you do.
>
> No, I don't. You're just confused again. I think that's your natural
> state.

That's what Satan wants you to believe.

>>> 4) No one in God's One True Church ever prays to Satan.


>
>> I haven't, but you sure have.
>
> No. The devil crept into your body through your wide-open anus and
> took complete possession of your mind and soul.

That's what Satan wants you to believe so that you'll continue to worship
him.

>> Yes.
>
> Satan promulgates lies. He is the father of liars. You admit you
> lie, therefore Satan is your spiritual father. True Christians like
> me resist Satanic influence.

You embody lies by denying that you lie. I admit that I lie, thereby
purging myself of any guilt. Therefore, you worship Satan.

>> That's what Satan wants you to believe.
>
> No. That's your only hope. It's very obvious that you're on the road
> to hell right now.

Obvious only to those who worship Satan.

>> Should I say "her?"
>
> Only if you want your torment to increase even more. God is Our
> Father. He won't hear your prayers no matter what you call Him -- but
> He will ease your agony in the lake of Fire IF you're especially nice
> to His people -- us.

More proof that you worship Satan.

>> That's what Satan wants you to believe.
>
> No. Satan wants me to believe the silly lies you tell.

That's what Satan tells you when you pray to him.

> I refuse.

Satan is glad.

> Why do you hate me so much?

If I hated you, why would I try to convince you that you worship Satan? I
would just allow you to continue in your delusion if I hated you.

> I'm only trying to help people -- including you -- find happiness through
> Jesus Christ. It's admittedly too late for you to reach heaven, but your
> loneliness and misery can be reduced a little if you support our efforts
> to save other sinners.

I refuse to support you Satan worshipers in your hateful delusions.

>> You serve the devil in all you write.
>
> How? Who has embraced a Satanic lifestyle after reading one of my
> sermons?

Anyone who believes the same as you.

> No one! Usually it's just the opposite that happens. I
> preach and sinners repent.

Well it's at least good to know that nobody has been fooled by your Satanic
preaching.

>> Yes, every time I say that you worship Satan.
>
> No. That's a total lie. If you really believe that you're
> delusional.

If you believe you don't worship Satan, you're the one who's delusional.

>> That's what Satan wants you to believe.
>
> It's what's true. You don't know what's true any longer. You've gone
> completely insane. I've been told that smegma can do that to you.

By Satan, right?

>> That's what Satan wants you to believe.
>
> That's what the Bible says. Jesus taught us about the burning hell so
> we would know it's there. You'll experience its horrors firsthand
> before long. Thanks to my preaching, many others will be able to
> avoid damnation. Why do you want people to go to hell? So you won't
> be lonely there?

Why do you want people to worship Satan? To convince yourself that you
don't?

>> Only Satan would try to convince you that there is no point in having
>> good intentions and that what you believe is all that matters.
>
> I never said that. You'll be judged by your actions -- blasphemy,
> irreverence, heresy, spite, mockery, oral sodomy, denial, and cheesy
> smegmatic buildup.

That's what Satan wants you to believe.

>> That's what Satan wants you to think.
>
> What makes you think so? Is it because you're filled with demons and
> can't seem to think straight?

No, it's because I'm filled with the truth that you don't want to hear.

>> Because that means I admit when I lie, which means I am honest.
>
> No. If you were truly honest, you wouldn't lie in the first place.

No. If you were truly honest, you would admit that you lie all the time.

>> You, on the other hand, lie continuously, which you just demonstrated.
>
> Continuously? What lie have I told? If you aren't circumcised,
> you've got smegma to deal with in some capacity or other. Smegma
> stinks. There are no two ways about that.

Thanks for demonstrating that you continuously lie.

>> That's what Satan wants you to believe.
>
> It's time to change the record, Bill. I think you've gone totally
> bonkers.

I have to repeat the truth.

>> Not about your Satan worship.
>
> There is no such thing.

Only Satan would want you to think that there's no such thing as Satan
worship.

>> Do I? When did I say that?
>
> What did you say about a prostate gland's being one penis's length
> inside the rectum? I asked three different straight men about that
> and they all said you're either crazy or queer. Or both. Isn't your
> opinion based at least in part on personal experience?

Is it? When did I say that?

>> Is that what Satan tells you when you pray to him?
>
> I never pray to Satan. I think you know that.

I know that you do pray to Satan.

>> So I won't suffer at all.
>
> Members of my Church have suffered because of you -- so yes, you will
> suffer endless agony in hell.

So you think that lying about me will make me burn in hell?

>> Yes, that's a lie when you say you don't worship Satan.
>
> No. As God is my Witness, I have NEVER worshiped Satan.

Your only "god" is Satan, so your statement is worthless.

>> As soon as you prove empirically that your evil god
>
> The Creator of Heavena nd Earth is NOT evil. That's proof that you're
> deeply confused.

The only confusion comes from you if you think Satan created heaven and
earth.

>> is real and hates homosexuality without using any verse from the Bible.
>
> God has told me so many times.

Thus proving you worship Satan.

> He hates homo-sexual lust -- but He loves individual homo-sexuals. He
> wants to save them from their sins.

More words from Satan.

>> I don't put myself into categories. I am me.
>
> Other homo-sexuals would put into any number of categories.

That's their problem.

> Some of them sexualize nerds. Computer geeks can usually think of
> uncommon uses for everyday household items.

We use the creativity God gave us.

> For most homo-sexuals, that means anal experimentation.

How is that uncommon?

>> Only if your "God" is Satan.
>
> No. Our God is the One True Lord. You've blasphemed His Holy Spirit
> and the Mother of Jesus Christ.

Your lord Satan, that is.

>> Sure he does.
>
> I can assure you he hates his duty of watching filth.

Sure he does.

> Some of the DVDs he reviews are so disgusting he throws them against the
> wall before he's even watched them to the end.

Is that what his story is?

>> He burns in lust, you mean.
>
> No. We are beyond that.

So if he's beyond lust he must be truly perverted!

>> Not if you're into that sort of thing.
>
> I think it's sick no matter who engages in it.

Then don't engage in it.

> It spreads hepatitis, for one. It can spread other diseases as well.

Not if there are no diseases present.

>> So in other words, your Satanic cult has lied again.
>
> I'm not involved in any kind of Satanic cult. Our Church preaches
> truth, not lies. It's true that homo-sexuals can't love. They burn
> in unnatural lust day and night.

Thus proving that you worship Satan, since only Satan would try to convince
someone of that.

>> The opposite of telling the truth.
>
> I ALWAYS tell the truth.

Except when you post here.

> How do you know what prostate stimulation feels like unless you've
> experienced it?

When did I say that I knew what it feels like?

>> Except when you post here.
>
> No. I NEVER lie. You, on the other hand, can't seem to stop lying --
> for Lucifer! I'm exactly the opposite -- consistently truthful.

See? You can't stop lying!

>> Which makes me more honest than you;
>
> That's impossible. You lie; I don't.

Except when you post here.

>> you refuse to admit you lie at all.


>
> That's because I don't.

See? More lies!

> You're just confused about the truth.

Nope. God has revealed the truth to me that you worship Satan.

> Why don't you see if getting circumcised helps you with that problem -- as
> well as the more obvious one.

More distractions from Satan, I see.

>> I'm not confused at all about your Satan worship.
>
> You're confused period. It's the devil inside you.

That's what Satan tells you when you pray to him.

>> I don't take any medication at all.
>
> Maybe you should start.

No need. There's nothing wrong with me that would cause me to need it.

>> My mind is perfectly clear when I discern your lies and Satan worship.
>
> If that's what you're "discerning," you're nuts.

That's what Satan wants you to believe.

>> It's not a matter of belief, it's right there.


>
> Only in the opinion of sexual perverts.

That's what Satan wants you to believe.

>> As if men were *designed* for anal sex!


>
> Why is it that straight men don't feel that way?

They choose not to take part in God's design.

>> For some, probably.
>
> You've admitted to sodomizing someone orally. Have you sodomized
> anyone -- male or female -- anally as well?

Why should I tell a Satan worshiper like you?

>> I'm sure that's what Satan tells you every time you pray to him.
>
> No. God revealed that Truth to me.

Your god Satan, that is.

>> ...as interpreted by Satan, of course.
>
> No. As interpreted by the Holy Spirit you blaspheme.

So that proves you worship Satan.

>> No, it's very possible.
>
> Only in a warped mind like yours that's full of the devil.

That's what Satan wants you to believe.

>> So do I.


>
> You also encourage other people to sin. That's a sure sign of demonic
> possession.

You persecute God's gay children. That's a sure sign you worship Satan.

>> That's what Satan wants you to think.
>
> That's what I can see with my own eyes.

The way Satan wants you to see.

>> > You also have smegma whether you're willing to believe it or not.
>>
>> Even if that were true, which it isn't, there's nothing in the Bible
>> against having smegma.
>
> Circumcision is supposed to prevent smegma. It works, too.

So does bathing regularly.

> Get circumcised and you'll see for yourself.

There's still nothing in the Bible about smegma.

>> Like I said, things that don't exist can't fail.
>
> It is taking shape even now. When the American people see Sarah Palin
> sidestep direct questions and play the same old Republican records,
> they start thinking that a Holy Theoracy might not be so bad. In fact
> it's the only answer.

Like I said, things that don't exist can't fail.

>> Which means she'll pretty much have to kill everyone but herself.
>
> No. Only criminals will be executed.

Which means she'll kill everyone but herself.

>> That's what Satan wants you to think.
>
> No. That's what Satan already has YOU believing.

That's what Satan tells you when you pray to him.

>> Yes, your "Facts" are total lies.


>
> No. My facts are just that. Your silly retorts are lies from the
> devil.

That's what Satan wants you to believe because you can't refute me.

>> If I was telling a lie, however, I would admit it.
>
> That still makes you a liar. I'm not a liar.

You just lied when you said that.

>> Satan has convinced you of that.
>
> All uncircumcised men have smegma issues.

Not when we bathe regularly.

> You're just in denial about them.

That's what Satan tells you when you pray to him.

>> Then why do you worship Satan?
>
> Change the record, dodo.

I'll never stop telling the truth about your Satan worship.

>> I'm sure that's what Satan told you when you prayed to him.
>
> I never prayed to Satan. You just invited him in without any sort of
> prayer.

That's what Satan wants you to believe.

>> I'm not confused at all about your ignorance or your Satan worship.


>
> Since neither is real, you are DEEPLY confused.

That you believe that just proves you worship Satan.

>> You attempt to dupe me with your obvious lies from Satan.
>
> I'm trying to warn sensible people not to listen to your filthy lies.
> I always preach the Truth.

You're convincing nobody, Satan-worshiper.

>> I'm sure that's what Satan told you when you prayed to him.
>
> No. I've never prayed to Satan.

Except you have.

>> So I was right, your Satan worshiping quack so-called "doctors."
>
> No. I mean true faith healers for Jesus. There are many in our
> Church.

That's what I said, your Satan worshiping quack so-called "doctors."

>> I'm sure that's the lie you tell people to get them in the door.
>
> Then why hasn't anyone EVER complained?

Because they're into that sort of thing.

> You only wish everyone was as sick and perverted as you are now.

I certainly can't match the perversion of even one member of your Satanic
cult.

>> Then why are you constantly repeating yourself like a "constipated
>> parrot?"
>
> I'm not. That's what you do. You are SERIOUSLY confused. You need
> some pain therapy.

See? You're constantly repeating yourself like a constipated parrot.

>> Yes!
>
> No.

Yes.

> I worship the Lord Jesus. You're confused. That's why you blaspheme what
> is holy.

You worship Satan. You just hate that I tell the truth about it.

>> Yet more proof that you worship Satan in disguise.
>
> I don't think so. God told us to root out unbelievers. Their assets
> be;belong to the Church.

More proof that your "god" is Satan in disguise.

>> That you think it is proves that you worship Satan.
>
> Your confusion is showing again.

Your Satan worship is showing again.

>> Which just proves that both you and he worship Satan.
>
> The fact that he prayed for Sarah Palin? You've got everything
> backwards.

The fact that both you and he hunt witches. Both of you are Satan
worshipers.

> I've done enough preaching for today...

...for Satan.

--
Bushism 10-14/15:
"We've tripled the amount of money--I believe it's from $50 million up to
$195 million available."
--Lima, Peru; March 23, 2002

0 new messages