Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

15 Questions That Stump Evolution

25 views
Skip to first unread message

curtjester1

unread,
Feb 11, 2013, 12:21:55 PM2/11/13
to
http://creation.com/15-questions

Syd M.

unread,
Feb 11, 2013, 12:37:48 PM2/11/13
to
On Feb 11, 12:21 pm, curtjester1 <curtjest...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> http://creation.com/15-questions

Dream on, loser.

PDW

Davej

unread,
Feb 11, 2013, 2:10:40 PM2/11/13
to
On Feb 11, 11:21 am, curtjester1 <curtjest...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> http://creation.com/15-questions

http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/

Andrew W

unread,
Feb 11, 2013, 3:25:42 PM2/11/13
to
"curtjester1" <curtj...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:90e11d57-58a1-4a65...@fv9g2000vbb.googlegroups.com
> http://creation.com/15-questions
>


1. How did life originate?

Answer: Ancient genetic engineering extraterrestrials.


2. How did the DNA code originate?

Answer: Ancient genetic engineering extraterrestrials.


3. ...

Answer: Same


--
Religions breed hypocrisy and self-righteousness.

Many Christians spend more time looking down on other people than up
towards Christ.


MarkA

unread,
Feb 11, 2013, 5:14:01 PM2/11/13
to
On Mon, 11 Feb 2013 09:21:55 -0800, curtjester1 wrote:

> http://creation.com/15-questions

One difference between science and religion: ignorance is temporary.
Stupidity is much harder to overcome.

--
MarkA

If you can read this, you can stop reading now.


kni...@baawa.com

unread,
Feb 11, 2013, 8:03:42 PM2/11/13
to
On Mon, 11 Feb 2013 09:21:55 -0800 (PST), curtjester1
<curtj...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>http://creation.com/15-questions

You left out my favorite.

If we evolved from monkeys, why are there still monkeys?

Oh... my next favorite.

If our bodies run on electricity, then why don't get electrocuted
in the shower?

Warlord Steve
BAAWA

Bob Casanova

unread,
Feb 12, 2013, 12:12:20 PM2/12/13
to
On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 07:25:42 +1100, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by "Andrew W"
<remove_...@optusnet.com.au>:

>"curtjester1" <curtj...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:90e11d57-58a1-4a65...@fv9g2000vbb.googlegroups.com
>> http://creation.com/15-questions
>>
>
>
>1. How did life originate?
>
>Answer: Ancient genetic engineering extraterrestrials.
>
>
>2. How did the DNA code originate?
>
>Answer: Ancient genetic engineering extraterrestrials.
>
>
>3. ...
>
>Answer: Same

Ummm...yeah.

Which leaves the question:

How did the extraterrestrials originate?
--

Bob C.

"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."

- McNameless

BruceS

unread,
Feb 12, 2013, 4:46:34 PM2/12/13
to
On 02/12/2013 10:12 AM, Bob Casanova wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 07:25:42 +1100, the following appeared
> in sci.skeptic, posted by "Andrew W"
> <remove_...@optusnet.com.au>:
>
>> "curtjester1" <curtj...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:90e11d57-58a1-4a65...@fv9g2000vbb.googlegroups.com
>>> http://creation.com/15-questions
>>>
>>
>>
>> 1. How did life originate?
>>
>> Answer: Ancient genetic engineering extraterrestrials.
>>
>>
>> 2. How did the DNA code originate?
>>
>> Answer: Ancient genetic engineering extraterrestrials.
>>
>>
>> 3. ...
>>
>> Answer: Same
>
> Ummm...yeah.
>
> Which leaves the question:
>
> How did the extraterrestrials originate?
>

It's extraterrestrials all the way down.

Andrew W

unread,
Feb 12, 2013, 4:54:28 PM2/12/13
to
"Bob Casanova" <nos...@buzz.off> wrote in message
news:attkh853jrpgr0ro2...@4ax.com
> On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 07:25:42 +1100, the following appeared
> in sci.skeptic, posted by "Andrew W"
> <remove_...@optusnet.com.au>:
>
>> "curtjester1" <curtj...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:90e11d57-58a1-4a65...@fv9g2000vbb.googlegroups.com
>>> http://creation.com/15-questions
>>>
>>
>>
>> 1. How did life originate?
>>
>> Answer: Ancient genetic engineering extraterrestrials.
>>
>>
>> 2. How did the DNA code originate?
>>
>> Answer: Ancient genetic engineering extraterrestrials.
>>
>>
>> 3. ...
>>
>> Answer: Same
>
> Ummm...yeah.
>
> Which leaves the question:
>
> How did the extraterrestrials originate?
>

By their ET ancestors.


--
Religions breed hypocrisy, ignorance and self-righteousness.



Budikka666

unread,
Feb 12, 2013, 7:22:21 PM2/12/13
to
On Feb 11, 11:21 am, curtjester1 <curtjest...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> http://creation.com/15-questions

Why don't you and I formally debate your fifteen questions right here
in this thread? I will refute all fifteen if you, in turn, will
tackle fifteen questions of mine.

You claim that you have an omnipotent god backing you up. Will you
admit you have no faith in your god by running away, or will you find
the courage and wherewithal to face me?

Budikka

Bob Casanova

unread,
Feb 13, 2013, 12:11:45 PM2/13/13
to
On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 14:46:34 -0700, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by BruceS <bruc...@hotmail.com>:
Seems so...

But this never seems to bother the woo-woos.

Bob Casanova

unread,
Feb 13, 2013, 12:12:52 PM2/13/13
to
On Wed, 13 Feb 2013 08:54:28 +1100, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by "Andrew W"
<remove_...@optusnet.com.au>:

>"Bob Casanova" <nos...@buzz.off> wrote in message
>news:attkh853jrpgr0ro2...@4ax.com
>> On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 07:25:42 +1100, the following appeared
>> in sci.skeptic, posted by "Andrew W"
>> <remove_...@optusnet.com.au>:
>>
>>> "curtjester1" <curtj...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:90e11d57-58a1-4a65...@fv9g2000vbb.googlegroups.com
>>>> http://creation.com/15-questions
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 1. How did life originate?
>>>
>>> Answer: Ancient genetic engineering extraterrestrials.
>>>
>>>
>>> 2. How did the DNA code originate?
>>>
>>> Answer: Ancient genetic engineering extraterrestrials.
>>>
>>>
>>> 3. ...
>>>
>>> Answer: Same
>>
>> Ummm...yeah.
>>
>> Which leaves the question:
>>
>> How did the extraterrestrials originate?
>>
>
>By their ET ancestors.

Uh-huh.

Let the group know when you come to the end of that chain...

bear

unread,
Feb 13, 2013, 12:36:50 PM2/13/13
to
On Monday, February 11, 2013 11:21:55 AM UTC-6, curtjester1 wrote:
> http://creation.com/15-questions

What is the big deal on evolution? I thought everyone knew that in the beginning there was nothing, then after a few billion years, nothing exploded, after another few billion years, the nothing that exploded in the beginning created the universe and from a rock in the universe, all life began. Sounds simple enough to me. I believe any real GTE person could provide irrefutable proof of these events.

Andrew W

unread,
Feb 13, 2013, 5:17:02 PM2/13/13
to
"Bob Casanova" <nos...@buzz.off> wrote in message
news:oainh8p3aa7be57uk...@4ax.com
There is no end of the chain.
The further back you go the less physical the beings were.
They started out as pure energy/consciousnesses. They don't need to be
created.
Only physical beings do.
Pure energy/consciousness is beyond time, and is eternal (energy cannot be
created or destroyed).

BruceS

unread,
Feb 13, 2013, 5:29:10 PM2/13/13
to
On 02/13/2013 10:11 AM, Bob Casanova wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 14:46:34 -0700, the following appeared
> in sci.skeptic, posted by BruceS <bruc...@hotmail.com>:
>
>> On 02/12/2013 10:12 AM, Bob Casanova wrote:
>>> On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 07:25:42 +1100, the following appeared
>>> in sci.skeptic, posted by "Andrew W"
>>> <remove_...@optusnet.com.au>:
>>>
>>>> "curtjester1" <curtj...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:90e11d57-58a1-4a65...@fv9g2000vbb.googlegroups.com
>>>>> http://creation.com/15-questions
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 1. How did life originate?
>>>>
>>>> Answer: Ancient genetic engineering extraterrestrials.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2. How did the DNA code originate?
>>>>
>>>> Answer: Ancient genetic engineering extraterrestrials.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 3. ...
>>>>
>>>> Answer: Same
>>>
>>> Ummm...yeah.
>>>
>>> Which leaves the question:
>>>
>>> How did the extraterrestrials originate?
>>>
>>
>> It's extraterrestrials all the way down.
>
> Seems so...
>
> But this never seems to bother the woo-woos.

I really don't get this fad for attempting rational arguments in support
of irrational belief systems. People of faith should simply follow
their faith, and not attempt to deconstruct it into logical pieces. Do
they really think they'll convince anyone to follow the Flying Spaghetti
Monster by inventing ludicrous explanations for how He flies?

BruceS

unread,
Feb 13, 2013, 5:30:55 PM2/13/13
to
I'm so sorry. I thought you were joking, and so I laughed. If you are,
indeed, serious, as this implies, then I should have made a sad face
instead. If you're continuing a joke, I fell for it.

Andrew W

unread,
Feb 13, 2013, 10:36:43 PM2/13/13
to
"BruceS" <bruc...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:kfh45k$glf$2...@dont-email.me
Its true. I've had it confirmed by several advanced sources including
scientists.
Physical life was an afterthought.

Bob Casanova

unread,
Feb 14, 2013, 11:53:03 AM2/14/13
to
On Thu, 14 Feb 2013 09:17:02 +1100, the following appeared
Nice conjecture. HAND.

Bob Casanova

unread,
Feb 14, 2013, 11:54:36 AM2/14/13
to
On Wed, 13 Feb 2013 15:29:10 -0700, the following appeared
I think it's the result of the oft-repeated fact that
religious beliefs have no evidence in support, combined with
a lack of actual faith.

Budikka666

unread,
Feb 14, 2013, 8:42:38 PM2/14/13
to
Whassup? Your omnipotent god suddenly deserted you? Funny how that
happens as soon as you creationists are put on the spot, isn't it?

Budikka

Budikka666

unread,
Feb 17, 2013, 7:55:50 AM2/17/13
to

bear

unread,
Feb 17, 2013, 1:41:31 PM2/17/13
to
On Sun, 17 Feb 2013 04:55:50 -0800 (PST), Budikka666
<budi...@netscape.net> wrote:

>> Whassup?  Your omnipotent god suddenly deserted you?  Funny how that
>> happens as soon as you creationists are put on the spot, isn't it?
>>
>> Budikka

Hello Budikka, your challenge was not addressed to me but I am a
"creationists" and would be willing to being "put on the spot", if, we
could agree to some simple guidelines.

I will agree to answer ALL questions that you may ask me, I will offer
the evidence that I am basing my answer on, if requested, I will not
use sources (scripture and/or religious sites) that cannot be
independently verified as accurate for my answers and, if I offer
comments that I have no proof of, I will say that it is only my
opinion, not a provable fact. Of course, I would expect you to be
willing to respond in like manner in an act of fairness.

So, what say you?

Budikka666

unread,
Feb 22, 2013, 6:13:48 PM2/22/13
to

bear

unread,
Feb 22, 2013, 6:20:44 PM2/22/13
to
That is not true, I responded to your post and said that I would by happy to engage in a discussion with you. Now, if you are not interested because I asked that we both agree to answer all questions asked and provide some evidence for them, then I understand. As I said, I am a creationists and I am willing to be put on the spot.

Budikka666

unread,
Feb 25, 2013, 7:08:40 PM2/25/13
to

Budikka666

unread,
Mar 1, 2013, 7:44:51 PM3/1/13
to

bear

unread,
Mar 1, 2013, 10:18:17 PM3/1/13
to
What is even funnier is you continue to post the same assertion
ignoring the two times that I have offered to "be put on the spot".
Apparently, you are not as confident in supporting your rebuttal as
you would like for folks to think.


"That is not true, I responded to your post and said that I would be
happy to engage in a discussion with you. Now, if you are not
interested because I asked that we both agree to answer all questions
asked and provide some evidence for them, then I understand. As I
said, I am a creationists and I am willing to be put on the spot."

0 new messages