Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: NO LAWN MOWING TODAY
2 views
Skip to first unread message
inv...@invalid.invalid
Aug 7, 2009, 2:11:09 PM8/7/09
to
"Requiscant In Pace" <requisca...@gmail.com> wrote:
So, seven times in row, you just posted "take it to email".
How is that using less time, energy and bandwith? In response to what
you consider flooding by all these other guys, you flood the group in
reply.
------------------
Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa...................................
Alexander Kalinowski
Aug 7, 2009, 2:15:15 PM8/7/09
to
Alex:
Dear Grace - the newsgroup will be flooded anyway by the new ash clique.
But it won't be flooded without a loud opposing voice. :-)
%
Aug 7, 2009, 2:17:35 PM8/7/09
to
inv...@invalid.invalid
Aug 7, 2009, 2:27:13 PM8/7/09
to
Alexander Kalinowski
Aug 7, 2009, 2:28:55 PM8/7/09
to
Alex:
Wahoo! Hallelujah! Eureka!
Ouch! (For that much ignorance must hurt. :-)
%
Aug 7, 2009, 2:30:57 PM8/7/09
to
<inv...@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:4a7c...@news.x-privat.org...
Alex's clique doesn't like me
Alexander Kalinowski
Aug 7, 2009, 2:33:59 PM8/7/09
to
Alex:
Wa-hoo! Eureka! Hallelujah! Ouch!
Alexander Kalinowski
Aug 7, 2009, 2:37:10 PM8/7/09
to
Alex:
There's no Alex's clique though - I am not affiliated with anyone like
you guys are... fortunately not. :-)
But there's a a new ash clique in town. And they support each other in
all kinds of anti-social behaviour.
%
Aug 7, 2009, 2:41:46 PM8/7/09
to
news:7e3ainF2...@mid.dfncis.de...
alex's clique are mean people
Alexander Kalinowski
Aug 7, 2009, 2:47:21 PM8/7/09
to
Alex:
There is no Alex clique though: but other people from cliques who try to
turn things upside down in order to get away with their anti-social
behaviour. :-)
%
Aug 7, 2009, 2:55:39 PM8/7/09
to
news:7e3b5qF2...@mid.dfncis.de...
the alex clique is funny
Alexander Kalinowski
Aug 7, 2009, 2:57:29 PM8/7/09
to
Alex:
There is no Alex clique though: it's an invention by the new ash clique
in order to cover up its tracks. :-)
inv...@invalid.invalid
Aug 7, 2009, 3:06:34 PM8/7/09
to
news:c4CdnUbcbMxY5eHX...@giganews.com...> news:7e3b73F2...@mid.dfncis.de...>>> news:7e3alcF2...@mid.dfncis.de...>>>>> news:7e3a1hF...@mid.dfncis.de...>>>>>>> news:7e386oF2...@mid.dfncis.de...>>>>>>>>> message news:7e37o1F2...@mid.dfncis.de...>>>>>>>>>>> message news:7e371gF...@mid.dfncis.de...
>>>>>>>>>>>> % wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Alexander Kalinowski" <alexander...@web.de> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>>> message news:7e34o1F...@mid.dfncis.de...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> % wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Alexander Kalinowski" <alexander...@web.de> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> message news:7e3433F...@mid.dfncis.de...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> % wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Alexander Kalinowski" <alexander...@web.de> wrote
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in message news:7e32t8F...@mid.dfncis.de...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> % wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Requiscant In Pace" <requisca...@gmail.com> wrote
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:9dd51544-ba2f-4222...@g1g2000vbr.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 7, 8:34 am, Alexander Kalinowski
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <alexanderkalinow...@web.de>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lamey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > "%" <pers...@gmail.com> wrote in news:naSdndX73JPV_-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > rXnZ2dnUVZ_sWdn...@giganews.com:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> the grass is too wet from all the rain ,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> yay , yahoo , woopee
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > I don't have a lawn, but if I did, I'd let you help
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > mow
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it. If
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wanted.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Take it to email.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, seven times in row, you just posted "take it to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> email".
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How is that using less time, energy and bandwith? In
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> response to what
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you consider flooding by all these other guys, you flood
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the group in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reply.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> he's a self fulfilling prophet
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No no. You've been posting like you're trying break
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Doug's all-time posting record. You stated repeatedly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that my posts only help increase
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your post count.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My job is only to make sure that you don't achieve that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> without being told repeatedly what to make of that. And I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> am achieving that. :-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and i'm achieving what i said so aren't we the little
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> achievers
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What good does it do though? :-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it seems to bring joy and stimulation to some people here
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No problem with that *until* your trying to break posting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> records starts and the noise this creates has a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> counter-productive effect.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> show me an example of this
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex:
>>>>>>>>>>>> You want me to show you a poster who never posted because of
>>>>>>>>>>>> it? :-)
>>>>>>>>>>>> Seriously?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Why don't you rather state your view on what effect it might
>>>>>>>>>>>> have, hmm?
>>>>>>>>>>>> :-)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> i don't have a view to share
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Alex:
>>>>>>>>>> Because you know they won't hold up under scrutiny.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Pretty cowardly, no? :-)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So much for being a 'winner'... <g>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> well go ahead and scrutinize my non view then ,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Alex:
>>>>>>>> Your actions and words will reveal your "non"-view. Can't escape
>>>>>>>> that one. :-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> now that i have you resorting to name calling
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Alex:
>>>>>>>> Why would I refrain from calling an act of cowardice an act of
>>>>>>>> cowardice?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> i don't know and i didn't ask
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Alex:
>>>>>> Then I didn't resort to name-calling either. :-)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> i don't care if you did or not
>>>>
>>>> Alex:
>>>> ...you'll claim I did either way, I know. Thus my calling you out on
>>>> your spin-doctoring.
>>>
>>>
>>> i'll never call you so wrong a roonie
>>
>> Alex:
>> You accused me falsely of name-calling. That stands. :-)
>
>
> show me me doing that
>>>>>>>>>>>> % wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Alexander Kalinowski" <alexander...@web.de> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> % wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Alexander Kalinowski" <alexander...@web.de> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> % wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Alexander Kalinowski" <alexander...@web.de> wrote
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> % wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Requiscant In Pace" <requisca...@gmail.com> wrote
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:9dd51544-ba2f-4222...@g1g2000vbr.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 7, 8:34 am, Alexander Kalinowski
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <alexanderkalinow...@web.de>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lamey wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > "%" <pers...@gmail.com> wrote in news:naSdndX73JPV_-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > rXnZ2dnUVZ_sWdn...@giganews.com:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> the grass is too wet from all the rain ,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> yay , yahoo , woopee
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > I don't have a lawn, but if I did, I'd let you help
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > mow
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it. If
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wanted.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Take it to email.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, seven times in row, you just posted "take it to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> email".
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How is that using less time, energy and bandwith? In
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> response to what
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you consider flooding by all these other guys, you flood
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the group in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reply.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No no. You've been posting like you're trying break
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Doug's all-time posting record. You stated repeatedly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that my posts only help increase
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your post count.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My job is only to make sure that you don't achieve that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> without being told repeatedly what to make of that. And I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> am achieving that. :-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and i'm achieving what i said so aren't we the little
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> achievers
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What good does it do though? :-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it seems to bring joy and stimulation to some people here
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No problem with that *until* your trying to break posting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> records starts and the noise this creates has a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> counter-productive effect.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> show me an example of this
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex:
>>>>>>>>>>>> You want me to show you a poster who never posted because of
>>>>>>>>>>>> it? :-)
>>>>>>>>>>>> Seriously?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Why don't you rather state your view on what effect it might
>>>>>>>>>>>> have, hmm?
>>>>>>>>>>>> :-)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> i don't have a view to share
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Alex:
>>>>>>>>>> Because you know they won't hold up under scrutiny.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Pretty cowardly, no? :-)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So much for being a 'winner'... <g>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> well go ahead and scrutinize my non view then ,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Alex:
>>>>>>>> Your actions and words will reveal your "non"-view. Can't escape
>>>>>>>> that one. :-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> now that i have you resorting to name calling
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Alex:
>>>>>>>> Why would I refrain from calling an act of cowardice an act of
>>>>>>>> cowardice?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> i don't know and i didn't ask
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Alex:
>>>>>> Then I didn't resort to name-calling either. :-)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> i don't care if you did or not
>>>>
>>>> Alex:
>>>> ...you'll claim I did either way, I know. Thus my calling you out on
>>>> your spin-doctoring.
>>>
>>>
>>> i'll never call you so wrong a roonie
>>
>> Alex:
>> You accused me falsely of name-calling. That stands. :-)
>
>
> show me me doing that
Gimme gimme gimme that thing
%
Aug 7, 2009, 3:07:45 PM8/7/09
to
<inv...@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:4a7c7b4a$1...@news.x-privat.org...
i'm going to the big town , yay
0 new messages