Re: (OT)Former NIH Chief: Ignore Gov Mammography Recommendation
JoeSpareBedroom
news:WsOdnTz9HpMr2JfW...@giganews.com...
>
> This is recommendation from a REAL Dr. of medicine NOT an obama
> political mouthpiece appointee.
I can't find any reputable source which says that the new recommendation
(age 50) came from an Obama political appointee. All news sources including
Faux say the recommendation came from a group of medical professionals. Show
your source. Maybe your source contains the real story.
JoeSpareBedroom
news:mi9lg5tf3lm5rb5n1...@4ax.com...
>
> Bambi is YOUR president.
>
> He and you are fools....
>
> --
>
> The Sot in Florida
What is the name of the political appointee dbu is referring to?
JoeSpareBedroom
> On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:17:51 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
> <news...@frontiernet.net> wrote:
>
>>"Scott in Florida" <Mov...@outa.here> wrote in message
>>news:mi9lg5tf3lm5rb5n1...@4ax.com...
>>> On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 07:28:34 -0500, "JoeSpareBedroom"
>>> <news...@frontiernet.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>"dbu`" <nos...@nobama.com.invalid> wrote in message
>>>>news:WsOdnTz9HpMr2JfW...@giganews.com...
>>>>>
>>>>> This is recommendation from a REAL Dr. of medicine NOT an obama
>>>>> political mouthpiece appointee.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>I can't find any reputable source which says that the new recommendation
>>>>(age 50) came from an Obama political appointee. All news sources
>>>>including
>>>>Faux say the recommendation came from a group of medical professionals.
>>>>Show
>>>>your source. Maybe your source contains the real story.
>>>>
>>>
>>> SPIN SPIN SPIN.....
>>>
>>> Bambi is YOUR president.
>>>
>>> He and you are fools....
>>>
>>> --
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> Bambi is in charge.
>
> You can't spin your way out of this.
tak
"dbu`" <nos...@nobama.com.invalid> wrote in message
> In article <NdvOm.46048$Zu5....@newsfe24.iad>,
> twit.
> --
So, as usual, you have nothing but the smoke out of your ass.
JoeSpareBedroom
> In article <NdvOm.46048$Zu5....@newsfe24.iad>,
> "JoeSpareBedroom" <news...@frontiernet.net> wrote:
>
> twit.
> --
>
In other words, you lied in your original message.
Mike Hunter
to reports in the media, Joe$#itForBrains.
What IS important is this is a precursor to what will happen if BO and the
Dims in Congress are allowed to take over our healthcare.
Guys like you, Joe$#itForBrains, should be concerned that the bill before
the Senate which will take $400,000,000 OUT of Medicare, and add Trillions
to the nation debt within fifteen years, according to reports in the media.
You like the NY times, READ todays front page for the facts, WBMS. LOL
Perhaps if you do you will educate yourself and we can stop calling you
Joe$#itForBrains
"Joe$#itForBrains" <news...@frontiernet.net> wrote in message
news:hxBOm.30527$cd7....@newsfe04.iad...
Hachiroku ハチロク
>
> "I'm saying very powerfully ignore them," former NIH director Dr.
> Bernardine Healy told "Fox
> News Sunday."
Never mind. Disregard this post. It references Fox News, and everyone
knows they'll do anything they can to stop Obama's Health Care Train.
Who cares if there wasn't a single Oncologist on the board? They have
statisticians!
Hachiroku ハチロク
>
> "dbu`" <nos...@nobama.com.invalid> wrote in message
> news:Jb-dnWPuNMCHT5fW...@giganews.com...
>> In article <NdvOm.46048$Zu5....@newsfe24.iad>, "JoeSpareBedroom"
>> <news...@frontiernet.net> wrote:
>>
>>> "dbu`" <nos...@nobama.com.invalid> wrote in message
>>> news:WsOdnTz9HpMr2JfW...@giganews.com...
>>> >
>>> > This is recommendation from a REAL Dr. of medicine NOT an obama
>>> > political mouthpiece appointee.
>>>
>>>
>>> I can't find any reputable source which says that the new
>>> recommendation (age 50) came from an Obama political appointee. All
>>> news sources including
>>> Faux say the recommendation came from a group of medical professionals.
>>> Show
>>> your source. Maybe your source contains the real story.
>>
>> LOL!! You think I'm spending time with your game playing. Fat chance
>> twit.
>> --
> So, as usual, you have nothing but the smoke out of your ass.
I quit smoking.
I have vapor coming out of mine!
http://www.e-smokeytreats.com/v/vspfiles/photos/510_kit-2.jpg
JoeSpareBedroom
news:4b0aeae0$0$22012$ce5e...@news-radius.ptd.net...
>A group that does "not have a single oncologist among it members,"
>according to reports in the media, Joe$#itForBrains.
Which "media" have focused on the lack of an oncologist? Give me an example.
> What IS important is this is a precursor to what will happen if BO and the
> Dims in Congress are allowed to take over our healthcare.
When the age was lowered from 50 to 40 in 2002, what comments were you
posting about that in newsgroups?
JoeSpareBedroom
news:pan.2009.11.23....@e86.GTS...
Actually, it's called epidemiology, not statistics, for subjects like this.
JoeSpareBedroom
news:pan.2009.11.23....@e86.GTS...
The actual point here is that dumberthanu (aka "dbu") thinks the person who
made the announcement also did the research to back up the announcement. Of
course, that's just plain silly, but what else should we expect from a boy
who does not read and is proud of that?
Hachiroku ハチロク
Um, you're the one that used the word statistician...
JoeSpareBedroom
Ah yes, but take a close look at the members of the group who came up with
the recent recommendation. :-)
Are you going to take a look?
JoeSpareBedroom
> In article <cZAOm.7261$Xb5....@newsfe19.iad>,
> "tak" <jki...@frontiernet.net> wrote:
>
>> "dbu`" <nos...@nobama.com.invalid> wrote in message
>> news:Jb-dnWPuNMCHT5fW...@giganews.com...
>> > In article <NdvOm.46048$Zu5....@newsfe24.iad>,
>> > "JoeSpareBedroom" <news...@frontiernet.net> wrote:
>> >
>> >> "dbu`" <nos...@nobama.com.invalid> wrote in message
>> >> news:WsOdnTz9HpMr2JfW...@giganews.com...
>> >> >
>> >> > This is recommendation from a REAL Dr. of medicine NOT an obama
>> >> > political mouthpiece appointee.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> I can't find any reputable source which says that the new
>> >> recommendation
>> >> (age 50) came from an Obama political appointee. All news sources
>> >> including
>> >> Faux say the recommendation came from a group of medical
>> >> professionals.
>> >> Show
>> >> your source. Maybe your source contains the real story.
>> >
>> > LOL!! You think I'm spending time with your game playing. Fat chance
>> > twit.
>> > --
>> So, as usual, you have nothing but the smoke out of your ass.
>
> political appointee mouthpiece?? Who has zero education in the medical
> field.
Which political appointeee are you're referring to? Once we have that
information, we can more accurately discuss this issue.
tak
"Hachiroku ????" <Tru...@e86.GTS> wrote in message
news:pan.2009.11.23....@e86.GTS...
could use an enema to get his back in the land of fresh air and clear
thinking.
Besides, Smoke enemas were a popular remedy in the !800's, which should make
Dooby comfortable, ensconced in the "Good Old Days".
JoeSpareBedroom
> In article <WkDOm.30548$cd7....@newsfe04.iad>,
Someone using the name "dbu'" began this thread by saying the following:
Subject line: Former NIH Chief: Ignore Gov Mammography Recommendation
Within the message:
"This is recommendation from a REAL Dr. of medicine NOT an obama
political mouthpiece appointee."
I want to know who you were referring to when you described "an obama
political mouthpiece appointee". In other words, please provide the first
and last name of a person.
edspyhill01
wrote:
The recommendations came from a panel consisting of 16 George Dubya
appointees. Looks like another exercise in apparachik misinformation
from the Bush crime family.
JoeSpareBedroom
news:1f4cdb47-7e87-4c67...@m20g2000vbp.googlegroups.com...
==============
The organization's site says ANYONE was recommend a member. I doubt they
were all Bush appointees, but it's possible. Bush probably didn't even know
the group existed.
Hachiroku ハチロク
> "Hachiroku ????" <Tru...@e86.GTS> wrote in message
> news:pan.2009.11.23....@e86.GTS...
>> On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:23:42 -0500, JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
>>
>>> "Hachiroku ????" <Tru...@e86.GTS> wrote in message
>>> news:pan.2009.11.23....@e86.GTS...
>>>> On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 02:20:03 -0600, dbu` wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> "I'm saying very powerfully ignore them," former NIH director Dr.
>>>>> Bernardine Healy told "Fox
>>>>> News Sunday."
>>>>
>>>> Never mind. Disregard this post. It references Fox News, and everyone
>>>> knows they'll do anything they can to stop Obama's Health Care Train.
>>>>
>>>> Who cares if there wasn't a single Oncologist on the board? They have
>>>> statisticians!
>>>
>>>
>>> Actually, it's called epidemiology, not statistics, for subjects like
>>> this.
>>
>> Um, you're the one that used the word statistician...
>
>
> Ah yes, but take a close look at the members of the group who came up with
> the recent recommendation. :-)
>
> Are you going to take a look?
I have. But there still aren't any Oncologists in the bunch.
And my old girlfriend...42....
JoeSpareBedroom
Was she in what all competent doctors call the "high risk group"?
And by the way, when it comes to epidemiology, the LAST person you'd want
crunching the numbers would be an oncologist, brain surgeon, internist,
pediatrician, ob/gyn, nurse, etc. They're not trained for that sort of work.
They might read articles, but it's not their job, really.
But you knew that, right?
Hachiroku ハチロク
I know. I couldn't resist. I have one tobacco ciggy every 3-4 days.
> As to smoke out of his ass, Dooby
> could use an enema to get his back in the land of fresh air and clear
> thinking.
>
> Besides, Smoke enemas were a popular remedy in the !800's, which should
> make Dooby comfortable, ensconced in the "Good Old Days".
Smoke enemas? Doesn't that lead to colon cancer?
SEE! I knew it! I'm NOT blowing smoke rings out of my ass, because I came
up clean on the colonoscopy!
JoeSpareBedroom
> In article <lMEOm.30562$cd7....@newsfe04.iad>,
That's how you ALWAYS end discussions when you began them without having
enough information and you're too stupid to go find it. It's great fun. Keep
it up.
Hachiroku ハチロク
Sure. But where do the number originate?
JoeSpareBedroom
They reported by doctors, hospitals and perhaps drug companies or
universities which conduct drug trials. That question really doesn't support
your argument.
JoeSpareBedroom
> In article <YhFOm.30568$cd7....@newsfe04.iad>,
What slap-down are you imagining? Describe it.
Mike Hunter
who have been falsifying records to support their "man is causing global
warming" theory, Joe$#itForBrains?
Seems that those who have been telling us the temperature of the world has
not increased since 1989 ARE WRONG. The temperature of the world has NOT
increased since the SIXTIES and that the temperature of the world has
actually been trending DOWN, since 1989. LOL
"Joe$#itForBrains" <news...@frontiernet.net> wrote in message
news:dbCOm.30533$cd7....@newsfe04.iad...
JoeSpareBedroom
> Sort of like the truth that is starting to come out about the "scientist"
> who have been falsifying records to support their "man is causing global
> warming" theory, Joe$#itForBrains?
No, not like that at all. Thanks for playing. Go change your cat litter,
grandpa.
Mike Hunter
LOL
"Joe$#itForBrains" <news...@frontiernet.net> wrote in message
news:ZdGOm.30578$cd7....@newsfe04.iad...
dr_jeff
> Sort of like the truth that is starting to come out about the "scientist"
> who have been falsifying records to support their "man is causing global
> warming" theory, Joe$#itForBrains?
>
> Seems that those who have been telling us the temperature of the world has
> not increased since 1989 ARE WRONG. The temperature of the world has NOT
> increased since the SIXTIES and that the temperature of the world has
> actually been trending DOWN, since 1989. LOL
Maybe the temperature of your brain due to decreased blood flow, but the
temperature of the world has been going up.
Jeff
tak
"dbu`" <nos...@nobama.com.invalid> wrote in message
> In article <YhFOm.30568$cd7....@newsfe04.iad>,
Dooby, you've been blown-up!
tak
"clean".
But in reference to my comment to you about quality here, reflect on the
"stock up on canned goods and ammo" thread.
tak
Please read this URL, then go to your local YMCA, get in pool and start
treading water, Let us know how you do.
"Mike Hunter" <Mikehunt2@lycos,com> wrote in message
news:4b0b2faf$0$22017$ce5e...@news-radius.ptd.net...
JoeSpareBedroom
news:SlJOm.23836$tz6...@newsfe02.iad...
It's amazing how he can begin a thread by mentioning "an appointee", without
having a clue about who he's actually referring to. But it was 3:20 AM when
he began the thread. He'd probably just picked himself up off the floor at
that point and was crawling to the bathroom to puke, when he decided on a
detour to the computer.
edspyhill01
wrote:
> "edspyhill01" <edspyhil...@gmail.com> wrote in message
They were all Bush appointees. Dig a little deeper. The panel's
chairperson states that Dubya appointed all the members.
"But Ned Calonge, who chairs the 16-member panel, defended the
recommendations and denied that cost or the debate over health-care
reform played any role in the decision. "Cost just isn't a
consideration when the task force deliberates," said Calonge, who is
also the chief medical officer for the Colorado Department of Public
Health and Environment. Twelve of the task force members were seated
during the Bush administration, and the remaining four were chosen
before President George W. Bush left office, he said."
"But critics note that under legislation pending in Congress, the
panel's guidelines could be used to set standards for what insurance
companies would be required to cover. And although the latest research
was started long before the most recent health-care debate began, the
timing of Monday's announcement led many opponents to speculate that
the two are related."
Complete article:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/11/17/AR2009111704197.html
JoeSpareBedroom
Complete article:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/11/17/AR2009111704197.html
=============
I still don't believe it. Any president's response to such nominations would
likely be "Yeah whatever. What am I signing, Radar?"
Hachiroku ハチロク
> And although the latest research was started
> long before the most recent health-care debate began, the timing of
> Monday's announcement led many opponents to speculate that the two are
> related."
DO YA THINK?!?!?!?!
JoeSpareBedroom
What were your thoughts, if any, when the AMA announced that PSA tests were
no longer considered the gold standard for detecting prostate problems?
Mike Hunter
who have been falsifying records to support their "man is causing global
"dr_jeff" <u...@msu.edu> wrote in message
news:EMOdnSVa2q0Z3ZbW...@giganews.com...
Mike Hunter
allow BO and Dims in Congress to get control of our healthcare system.
Bureaucrats will determine what procedures you will get rather than your
doctor. Look at what they have planned for Medicare in the goofy bill.
It will take $400,000,000 from Medicare, which is currently headed for
bankruptcy and use it to help "fund" the new bill.
You will be required to buy health insurance, like auto insurance. If you
do NOT you will have 2 1/2% added to you income tax. If you still do not
buy insurance you can be sent to prison for FIVE years. If you doubt that
look it up, that what is in the bill passed by the House
Is this the "change" you thought for which you voted?
"Hachiroku ????" <Tru...@e86.GTS> wrote in message
news:pan.2009.11.24...@e86.GTS...
Mike Hunter
tells me to do, not anyone else. Certainly not what some Bureaucrat tells
me to do. What did you think, Joe$#itForBrains?
"Joe$#itForBrains" <news...@frontiernet.net> wrote in message
news:LzSOm.37652$We2....@newsfe09.iad...
Hachiroku ハチロク
> Directly no, but it is a clear indication of what will happen if we ever
> allow BO and Dims in Congress to get control of our healthcare system.
> Bureaucrats will determine what procedures you will get rather than your
> doctor. Look at what they have planned for Medicare in the goofy bill.
> It will take $400,000,000 from Medicare, which is currently headed for
> bankruptcy and use it to help "fund" the new bill.
>
> You will be required to buy health insurance, like auto insurance. If
> you do NOT you will have 2 1/2% added to you income tax. If you still do
> not buy insurance you can be sent to prison for FIVE years. If you doubt
> that look it up, that what is in the bill passed by the House
>
> Is this the "change" you thought for which you voted?
Not me. I voted for a moderate.