Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

{OT} Just in case you might have missed anything...

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Hachiroku ハチロク

unread,
Jul 4, 2009, 3:03:15 PM7/4/09
to
MORE on Michael Jackson, Today Show, Monday morning.

NBC: All Michael, All the time.


JoeSpareBedroom

unread,
Jul 4, 2009, 7:09:15 PM7/4/09
to
"Hachiroku ????" <Tru...@e86.GTS> wrote in message
news:pan.2009.07.04....@e86.GTS...

> MORE on Michael Jackson, Today Show, Monday morning.
>
> NBC: All Michael, All the time.


Remember the SNL show where Buckwheat was shot, and they spent the entire
show goofing on the way the press latches onto celebrity nonsense for days
and days and days.....?


Cathy

unread,
Jul 4, 2009, 7:49:31 PM7/4/09
to

"Hachiroku ????" <Tru...@e86.GTS> wrote in message
news:pan.2009.07.04....@e86.GTS...
> MORE on Michael Jackson, Today Show, Monday morning.
>
> NBC: All Michael, All the time.

But... are you surprised?? ;-) Listen to NPR instead of watching the TV
news. At least one person complained to them (local NPR - the RVO stations)
a week or so ago (the email was read on air) that they had too much MJ
coverage - IIRC, they dedicated one program to him soon after his death.

Cathy

Message has been deleted

Cathy

unread,
Jul 4, 2009, 8:25:59 PM7/4/09
to

"Conscience" <nobama@g�v.com> wrote in message
news:h2oqo9$cka$1...@news.albasani.net...
> So what you're saying is that even NPR gave him more time than he
> deserved. ;-)

Not really. I wasn't a fan, but can acknowledge that the guy was the "King
of Pop" & had a lot of talent. Weird as hell, but talented, & he does/did
have a wide fan base. One program dedicated to his work/life seems
reasonable to me. But obviously not to everyone. ;-) It's also possible
that whoever complained was afraid it was a slippery slope - that NPR would
succumb to the same amount of (his) supposed newsworthiness that the rest of
the media has. But that's pretty difficult to envision.

Cathy


>


JoeSpareBedroom

unread,
Jul 4, 2009, 8:28:17 PM7/4/09
to
"Conscience" <nobama@g�v.com> wrote in message
news:h2oqo9$cka$1...@news.albasani.net...
> On 2009-07-04 16:49:31 -0700, "Cathy" <cl...@roadrunner.com> said:
>
>>
> So what you're saying is that even NPR gave him more time than he
> deserved. ;-)
>


Still haven't learned to play that guitar, have you?


Message has been deleted

Hachiroku ハチロク

unread,
Jul 4, 2009, 5:23:44 PM7/4/09
to

I stopped watching it by then.

I think it was beacuse Franken was one of the head writers.
I have *NEVER* liked Franken. Even when *I* was a Liberal.

JoeSpareBedroom

unread,
Jul 4, 2009, 9:25:20 PM7/4/09
to


Charles???


Message has been deleted

Cathy

unread,
Jul 4, 2009, 10:10:40 PM7/4/09
to

"Conscience" <nobama@g�v.com> wrote in message
news:h2otme$fuo$1...@news.albasani.net...

> On 2009-07-04 17:25:59 -0700, "Cathy" <cl...@roadrunner.com> said:
>
>>
>> "Conscience" <nobama@g�v.com> wrote in message
>> news:h2oqo9$cka$1...@news.albasani.net...
>>> On 2009-07-04 16:49:31 -0700, "Cathy" <cl...@roadrunner.com> said:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Hachiroku ????" <Tru...@e86.GTS> wrote in message
>>>> news:pan.2009.07.04....@e86.GTS...
>>>>> MORE on Michael Jackson, Today Show, Monday morning.
>>>>>
>>>>> NBC: All Michael, All the time.
>>>>
>>>> But... are you surprised?? ;-) Listen to NPR instead of watching the
>>>> TV
>>>> news. At least one person complained to them (local NPR - the RVO
>>>> stations)
>>>> a week or so ago (the email was read on air) that they had too much MJ
>>>> coverage - IIRC, they dedicated one program to him soon after his
>>>> death.
>>>
>>> So what you're saying is that even NPR gave him more time than he
>>> deserved. ;-)
>>
>> Not really. I wasn't a fan, but can acknowledge that the guy was the
>> "King
>> of Pop" & had a lot of talent.
>
> Guess you missed that wink at the end. A tongue-in-cheek comment. And
> the Rochester idiot once again missed the context.

I saw the wink, but misinterpreted it; now on the same page!

Cathy


>


Message has been deleted

Hachiroku ハチロク

unread,
Jul 4, 2009, 7:00:13 PM7/4/09
to
On Sat, 04 Jul 2009 19:56:49 -0700, Conscience wrote:

> On 2009-07-04 19:10:40 -0700, "Cathy" <cl...@roadrunner.com> said:
>>>>> So what you're saying is that even NPR gave him more time than he
>>>>> deserved. ;-)
>>>>
>>>> Not really. I wasn't a fan, but can acknowledge that the guy was the
>>>> "King
>>>> of Pop" & had a lot of talent.
>>>
>>> Guess you missed that wink at the end. A tongue-in-cheek comment. And
>>> the Rochester idiot once again missed the context.
>>
>> I saw the wink, but misinterpreted it; now on the same page!
>

> I thought so.

I'm wondering if the two of you will *EVER* make it to the same page.. ;p

Cathy

unread,
Jul 4, 2009, 11:03:34 PM7/4/09
to

"Hachiroku ????" <Tru...@e86.GTS> wrote in message
news:pan.2009.07.04....@e86.GTS...

Yep. On the rare occasion. ;-P

Cathy


>
>
>


Message has been deleted

Hachiroku ハチロク

unread,
Jul 4, 2009, 10:50:56 PM7/4/09
to
On Sat, 04 Jul 2009 20:08:33 -0700, Conscience wrote:

> Only when our minds converge. ;-P
>
> Despite our obvious differences, Cathy has a mind. Unlike some others here.

True, that.

Sharx35

unread,
Jul 5, 2009, 2:11:56 AM7/5/09
to

"Cathy" <cl...@roadrunner.com> wrote in message
news:jZidncJaCpWFbtLX...@giganews.com...

He never WAS the King of Pop, is NOT the King of Pop and NEVER will be the
King of Pop.

Message has been deleted

Lester Fredricsen

unread,
Jul 5, 2009, 7:32:32 AM7/5/09
to
In article <MuX3m.34871$PH1.34257@edtnps82>,
"Sharx35" <sha...@hotmail.com> wrote:

For sure. That is a title that some of his fans, media groupies and
followers bestowed upon him. He wasn't that great a talent. If he
didn't use all the fireworks and just stood on the stage and sang, like
Frank, or Elvis he would have been a flop.

matrixxx09

unread,
Jul 5, 2009, 8:50:12 AM7/5/09
to
On Jul 4, 3:03 pm, Hachiroku ハチロク <Tru...@e86.GTS> wrote:
> MORE on Michael Jackson, Today Show, Monday morning.
>
> NBC: All Michael, All the time.

Why do you think Michael Jackson was a moron?

Cathy

unread,
Jul 5, 2009, 2:12:36 PM7/5/09
to

"Hachiroku ????" <Tru...@e86.GTS> wrote in message
news:pan.2009.07.05....@e86.GTS...

Which would be... on those rare occasions. <g>

>>
>> Despite our obvious differences, Cathy has a mind. Unlike some others
>> here.
>
> True, that.

Aww, you guys are making me blush. ;-)

Cathy


Hachiroku ハチロク

unread,
Jul 5, 2009, 3:11:27 PM7/5/09
to


Mixed feelings. He sure was weird. He sure was a genius.
Sometimes genius walks the line with insanity.

His music was OK, there was some good stuff and then there was the pure
commercial 80's stuff.

I wish I had 1/10 of his creativity...

I'm just sick of the daily news coverage, often at the expense of other
stories that should be told.


JoeSpareBedroom

unread,
Jul 5, 2009, 5:01:22 PM7/5/09
to
"Sharx35" <sha...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:MuX3m.34871$PH1.34257@edtnps82...


Probably true, but the fact that he led a sordid life doesn't change the
fact that he made some remarkable music at one time. None less than Fred
Astaire and James Brown thought he was pretty remarkable in his early years.
If bizarre behavior negated musical achievments, there wouldn't be many
musicians left to admire. The best ones seem to be drawn to extremes at
times.


JoeSpareBedroom

unread,
Jul 5, 2009, 5:02:27 PM7/5/09
to
"Hachiroku ????" <Tru...@e86.GTS> wrote in message
news:pan.2009.07.05....@e86.GTS...

> On Sun, 05 Jul 2009 05:50:12 -0700, matrixxx09 wrote:
>
>> On Jul 4, 3:03 pm, Hachiroku ???? <Tru...@e86.GTS> wrote:
>>> MORE on Michael Jackson, Today Show, Monday morning.
>>>
>>> NBC: All Michael, All the time.
>>
>> Why do you think Michael Jackson was a moron?
>
>
> Mixed feelings. He sure was weird. He sure was a genius.
> Sometimes genius walks the line with insanity.
>
> His music was OK, there was some good stuff and then there was the pure
> commercial 80's stuff.
>
> I wish I had 1/10 of his creativity...
>
> I'm just sick of the daily news coverage, often at the expense of other
> stories that should be told.
>
>


So turn off the TV and find the news you want on the internet. This way, you
control what you see.


hachiroku

unread,
Jul 5, 2009, 10:02:27 PM7/5/09
to

Blogs? No, thanks...

hachiroku

unread,
Jul 5, 2009, 10:03:12 PM7/5/09
to

Scan through the posts to the last time I listened to NPR.
Seems even they may be fed up with your boy...

hachiroku

unread,
Jul 5, 2009, 10:04:12 PM7/5/09
to


And? He was a great showman. That was part of his genius.

JoeSpareBedroom

unread,
Jul 6, 2009, 12:42:54 AM7/6/09
to
"hachiroku" <Tru...@e86.GTS> wrote in message
news:pan.2009.07.06....@e86.GTS...


Are the only two choices TV news or blogs? Nothing in between?


matrixxx09

unread,
Jul 6, 2009, 10:37:33 AM7/6/09
to
On Jul 5, 3:11 pm, Hachiroku ハチロク <Tru...@e86.GTS> wrote:

> >> MORE on Michael Jackson, Today Show, Monday morning.
>

>


> > Why do you think Michael Jackson was a moron?

>
> Mixed feelings. He sure was weird. He sure was a genius.
> Sometimes genius walks the line with insanity.

Damn. I tried.

"More on Michael Jackson..."

Hachiroku ハチロク

unread,
Jul 6, 2009, 2:15:34 PM7/6/09
to


Some days I'm just not 100%...


Hachiroku ハチロク

unread,
Jul 6, 2009, 2:15:52 PM7/6/09
to

Seems that way.

JoeSpareBedroom

unread,
Jul 6, 2009, 3:25:03 PM7/6/09
to
"Hachiroku ????" <Tru...@e86.GTS> wrote in message
news:pan.2009.07.06....@e86.GTS...


Well, that explains your problem.


Hachiroku ハチロク

unread,
Jul 6, 2009, 2:51:26 PM7/6/09
to
On Mon, 06 Jul 2009 15:25:03 -0400, JoeSpareBedroom wrote:

>>> Are the only two choices TV news or blogs? Nothing in between?
>>
>> Seems that way.
>
>
> Well, that explains your problem.

The only problem I see is that I have to leave the house and drive all
over the Northeast to *work*.

Even when I was a desk jockey, I still had to *work*.

0 new messages