Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Why is a 59 Lark 2dr Ht nearly worthless?

5 views
Skip to first unread message

MBH

unread,
Dec 7, 2009, 10:41:45 AM12/7/09
to

Paul Johnson

unread,
Dec 7, 2009, 1:20:22 PM12/7/09
to

"MBH" <murray...@shaw.ca> wrote in message
news:Zm9Tm.52263$X01....@newsfe07.iad...
>
Worthless being what? A '59 Lark hardtop is pretty desirable.
Paul Johnson


MBH

unread,
Dec 7, 2009, 6:42:16 PM12/7/09
to
Runs and drives. Could use 4 fenders. Not worth $1000 here in BC.
"Paul Johnson" <thejo...@frontiernet.net> wrote in message
news:JIbTm.86654$Wf2....@newsfe23.iad...

Deepnhock

unread,
Dec 7, 2009, 10:18:04 PM12/7/09
to
Probably because there is no description of the who, what, where,
when, and why, and how much.
The internet has spoiled up.
We need much more info to ascertain that your Stude is worthless.

MBH

unread,
Dec 7, 2009, 10:39:07 PM12/7/09
to
ok!59 2door hardtop Lark 8 automatic.A little ruff but runs and goes. Will
stop sorta. Pretty good floor and trunk rusty fenders and trunk side
panels.70.000 miles on the clock? Had it running 2 weeks ago.
"Deepnhock" <deep...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:bb14d421-fecb-4f59...@g12g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...

Deepnhock

unread,
Dec 8, 2009, 9:00:53 AM12/8/09
to
Where?


On Dec 7, 10:39 pm, "MBH" <murray.har...@shaw.ca> wrote:
> ok!59 2door hardtop Lark 8 automatic.A little ruff but runs and goes. Will
> stop sorta. Pretty good floor and trunk rusty fenders and trunk side

> panels.70.000 miles on the clock? Had it running 2 weeks ago."Deepnhock" <deepnh...@gmail.com> wrote in message

MBH

unread,
Dec 8, 2009, 10:27:40 AM12/8/09
to
As I said above BC Canada

"Deepnhock" <deep...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:466fc0a0-9429-4254...@u7g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...

Deepnhock

unread,
Dec 9, 2009, 1:43:17 PM12/9/09
to
Ok...Got it.
Thanks,
Jeff

On Dec 8, 10:27 am, "MBH" <murray.har...@shaw.ca> wrote:
> As I said above BC Canada"Deepnhock" <deepnh...@gmail.com> wrote in message


Colin Jack

unread,
Dec 9, 2009, 2:58:17 PM12/9/09
to
six or eight, or did I miss that.

Colin

Colin Jack

unread,
Dec 9, 2009, 2:59:13 PM12/9/09
to
I did miss the eight in the description. 259 or 289?

Paul Johnson

unread,
Dec 9, 2009, 5:09:10 PM12/9/09
to
Unless it has had an engine transplant it has to be a 259. Studebaker only
offered a 259 in '59 (even in Hawks). Larks didn't have 289s until '61 and
then they were only optional on Cruisers.

"Colin Jack" <drcol...@pei.aibn.net> wrote in message
news:4b200185$0$5337$9a56...@news.aliant.net...

MBH

unread,
Dec 10, 2009, 5:03:02 PM12/10/09
to
Yep 259 auto

"Paul Johnson" <thejo...@frontiernet.net> wrote in message
news:efVTm.17829$_b5....@newsfe22.iad...

MBH

unread,
Dec 15, 2009, 2:46:45 AM12/15/09
to
Guess it just is?

MBH

unread,
Dec 20, 2009, 12:37:37 AM12/20/09
to
Parts? or scrap?

"MBH" <murray...@shaw.ca> wrote in message
news:I9HVm.4199$Z%1....@newsfe02.iad...

stude232

unread,
Dec 20, 2009, 4:21:14 PM12/20/09
to
On Dec 7, 10:41 am, "MBH" <murray.har...@shaw.ca> wrote:
>

My parts book doesn't even list a 59HT

0 new messages