Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Why is a 59 Lark 2dr Ht nearly worthless?
5 views
Skip to first unread message
MBH
Dec 7, 2009, 10:41:45 AM12/7/09
to
Paul Johnson
Dec 7, 2009, 1:20:22 PM12/7/09
to
"MBH" <murray...@shaw.ca> wrote in message
news:Zm9Tm.52263$X01....@newsfe07.iad...
>
Worthless being what? A '59 Lark hardtop is pretty desirable.
Paul Johnson
MBH
Dec 7, 2009, 6:42:16 PM12/7/09
to
Runs and drives. Could use 4 fenders. Not worth $1000 here in BC.
"Paul Johnson" <thejo...@frontiernet.net> wrote in message
news:JIbTm.86654$Wf2....@newsfe23.iad...
"Paul Johnson" <thejo...@frontiernet.net> wrote in message
news:JIbTm.86654$Wf2....@newsfe23.iad...
Deepnhock
Dec 7, 2009, 10:18:04 PM12/7/09
to
Probably because there is no description of the who, what, where,
when, and why, and how much.
The internet has spoiled up.
We need much more info to ascertain that your Stude is worthless.
when, and why, and how much.
The internet has spoiled up.
We need much more info to ascertain that your Stude is worthless.
MBH
Dec 7, 2009, 10:39:07 PM12/7/09
to
ok!59 2door hardtop Lark 8 automatic.A little ruff but runs and goes. Will
stop sorta. Pretty good floor and trunk rusty fenders and trunk side
panels.70.000 miles on the clock? Had it running 2 weeks ago.
"Deepnhock" <deep...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:bb14d421-fecb-4f59...@g12g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...
stop sorta. Pretty good floor and trunk rusty fenders and trunk side
panels.70.000 miles on the clock? Had it running 2 weeks ago.
"Deepnhock" <deep...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:bb14d421-fecb-4f59...@g12g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...
Deepnhock
Dec 8, 2009, 9:00:53 AM12/8/09
to
Where?
On Dec 7, 10:39 pm, "MBH" <murray.har...@shaw.ca> wrote:
> ok!59 2door hardtop Lark 8 automatic.A little ruff but runs and goes. Will
> stop sorta. Pretty good floor and trunk rusty fenders and trunk side
> panels.70.000 miles on the clock? Had it running 2 weeks ago."Deepnhock" <deepnh...@gmail.com> wrote in message
MBH
Dec 8, 2009, 10:27:40 AM12/8/09
to
As I said above BC Canadanews:466fc0a0-9429-4254...@u7g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
Deepnhock
Dec 9, 2009, 1:43:17 PM12/9/09
to
Ok...Got it.
Thanks,
Jeff
Thanks,
Jeff
On Dec 8, 10:27 am, "MBH" <murray.har...@shaw.ca> wrote:
> As I said above BC Canada"Deepnhock" <deepnh...@gmail.com> wrote in message
Colin Jack
Dec 9, 2009, 2:58:17 PM12/9/09
to
six or eight, or did I miss that.
Colin
Colin Jack
Dec 9, 2009, 2:59:13 PM12/9/09
to
I did miss the eight in the description. 259 or 289?
Paul Johnson
Dec 9, 2009, 5:09:10 PM12/9/09
to
Unless it has had an engine transplant it has to be a 259. Studebaker only
offered a 259 in '59 (even in Hawks). Larks didn't have 289s until '61 and
then they were only optional on Cruisers.
offered a 259 in '59 (even in Hawks). Larks didn't have 289s until '61 and
then they were only optional on Cruisers.
"Colin Jack" <drcol...@pei.aibn.net> wrote in message
news:4b200185$0$5337$9a56...@news.aliant.net...
MBH
Dec 10, 2009, 5:03:02 PM12/10/09
to
Yep 259 autonews:efVTm.17829$_b5....@newsfe22.iad...
MBH
Dec 15, 2009, 2:46:45 AM12/15/09
to
Guess it just is?
MBH
Dec 20, 2009, 12:37:37 AM12/20/09
to
Parts? or scrap?news:I9HVm.4199$Z%1....@newsfe02.iad...
stude232
Dec 20, 2009, 4:21:14 PM12/20/09
to
0 new messages