If you have the manual (no spring) tensioner, you will want to make or buy
the wrench to turn the odd sized nut that tensions the belt - set it "about
right" based on what the old one felt like, rotate engine by hand and see
that all is well and it still feels "about right", then start car and let it
idle - if belt flaps, it's too loose, tighten "just a bit". If you hear a
whine that sounds like a rootes blower (supercharger), it's too tight,
loosen it.
"R Miller" <rmi...@anon.net> wrote in message
news:Wa6dnU5HDrN4PdjV...@comcast.com...
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **
Thanks. I found the FAQ at Clark's, and that helped a lot. I also
looked for the timing belt and balance belt online. I was surprised to
see that the balance belt is about twice as expensive as the timing belt.
> If you have the manual (no spring) tensioner, you will want to make or buy
> the wrench to turn the odd sized nut that tensions the belt - set it "about
> right" based on what the old one felt like, rotate engine by hand and see
> that all is well and it still feels "about right", then start car and let it
> idle - if belt flaps, it's too loose, tighten "just a bit". If you hear a
> whine that sounds like a rootes blower (supercharger), it's too tight,
> loosen it.
I suspect I've got the manual (no spring), but that's first on my list
to check. Are there any other components I'm likely to need (or should
replace) beyond the two belts? I'm at about 150K miles now.
I would recommend you replace all the rollers, particularly !!!! the timing
belt tensioning roller. If you see any evidence of an oil leak from the
front seal, it is expedient to replace it at the same time - and same for
balance shaft seals. Also, inspect water pump - on my 85.5, the original
pump started to leak at 90K miles, the replacement pump is still operational
and not leaking at over 250K miles
balance shaft belt has teeth on both sides - that makes it cost more.
Gates makes a tool called "klickit" for testing belt tension - it's cheap,
$10 - you can use one of those to build your confidence, but the "whine or
flap" test I described is what I do, and it has never failed me. But,
remember, if the timing belt breaks, you will damage valves, and it will
cost you about $600 in parts plus your labor to remove head and have it
fixed.
"darthpup" <amch...@mailexcite.com> wrote in message
news:ce4ee636-3fdc-4a35...@a1g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
"Nut that holds the wheel" <krask...@dakotacomm.net> wrote in message
news:KvadnelQQ4SWlh_V...@posted.dakotacomip...
following up - I changed a timing belt and balance shaft belt yesterday - so
I did the test with/without and it is clearly obvious at idle that the
balance shaft belt is not installed. In fact, when a 944 was my daily
driver, I would wait for the balance shaft belt to break as my signal to
change both belts - never failed me.
The reason your balance shaft belts broke - is because they weren't
tensioned properly. My 1st 944 with 550,000 miles - NEVER broke a belt.
My now 87 944 with 250,000 miles also never broke a belt. I change the
belts when the water pump fails or the roller bearings start squeaking.
Adjusting those belts based on their flapping or not - is absolutely
ridiculous.
jolie
"William Noble" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:ace5a$48841bfb$23...@news.teranews.com...
I honestly don't care if you or anyone else believes me - your statement
about why the belts break is false, they break due to wear and age. I
posted a hint about belts for those who wish to consider it. You are free
to disregard it. Much of what you read on the internet is untrue or
nonsense. You and anyone else who reads anything on the internet is
responsible for decidign what is and is not reasonable and true. Between
the 944s I've kept running, I would say there is at least a million miles,
maybe more. I've done all my own work since 1985, if you do your own work,
perhaps you can post how you set belt tension on a pre 87 car. If you do
not do your own work, you are not qualified to discuss the issue.
"jolieoli" <a...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:jJidnRKMJ-fDXhHV...@earthlink.com...
Dale Carnegie has written a very well received book: How to Win
Friends and Influence People.
Good reading when inside human society.
If you remove the balance shaft belt, start the engine and notice
vibration, then you have other problems with the engine.
Odd that you should say that - I would expect that the Porsche litereature
would be correct - it explains that the purpose of the balance shaft is to
reduce vibration.
In my 3/4 million miles of Porsche driving and maintenance, I NEVER had a
belt break. I dont really follow Porsche's scheduled maintenance mileage
recommendations. I just change the belts (and every other time - the
rollers) whenever the water pump fails. I guess if you go that long without
changing belts, they better be initially adjusted perfectly - aka the
Porsche belt tensioning gauge.
joliett
______________
______________
"William Noble" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:2477$48915741$14...@news.teranews.com...
on the 944, as I said, you can drive until the balance shaft belt breaks
(and yes, it does break) - and then change both - since the balance shaft
belt turns twice as fast as the cam belt, it will fail first, and the
increasd vibration is really obvious. Like you, I've never had a timing
belt break in something over a million miles - even with my procedure of
letting the balance shaft belt break as an "indicator" - I have had a roller
fail, with equivalent bad results, so I now change the rollers if there is
any suspicion. Oh, and I don't use the expensive tool, I've always set the
belts by hand.
"jolie" <a...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:Mq2dnQe9nL4OPgPV...@giganews.com...
My friend is one of the most respected and trusted Porsche mechanic and he
wouldn't adjust a belt without the Porsche belt adjuster. I also thought I
could hand adjust the belt - but it was never correct. That belt has to
have zero tension on it - and that's what prevents teeth from breaking off -
hence, I never had a broken belt.
Well I still have my old trusty 87 944, but I just bought a new 08 VELOCITY
YELLOW CORVETTE...what a great supercar so far. GM and the USA should be
proud.
But it remains to be seen if the car has the greatness of a Porsche.
My 30 years and 800,000 miles of driving and maintaining my two 944's myself
has been nothing short of spectacular.
--
joliett
______________
______________
"William Noble" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:ef195$48a13559$38...@news.teranews.com...
and, quite frankly, your statement "the belt has to have zero tension on it"
is absolute complete utter nonsense. What do you think that $650 gauge
measures if it isn't belt tension? In fact it is physically impossible for
the belt to have zero tension on it, even if you are holding it in your hand
not installed in the car.
I am sure your friend is an excellent and trusted mechanic. If he is also
technically knowlegable, have him explain to you about belt tension. Or,
you can read for yourself in the SAE handbook, or in the Porsche manual, or
in a myriad of other technical publications.
Normally I would ignore this, but if others were to believe the "zero
tension" statement, they would put their car at serious risk of damage - you
may do what you want with your car, but others should be extremely cautious
if they elect to follow your tension number.
"jolie" <a...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:5c6dnS7FT6277z_V...@giganews.com...
> Oh a TT huh, nice girl's car- did the belt fail after you replaced it - or
> was it installed by Audi?
>
> My friend is one of the most respected and trusted Porsche mechanic and he
> wouldn't adjust a belt without the Porsche belt adjuster. I also thought
> I could hand adjust the belt - but it was never correct. That belt has to
> have zero tension on it - and that's what prevents teeth from breaking
> off - hence, I never had a broken belt.
>
> Well I still have my old trusty 87 944, but I just bought a new 08
> VELOCITY YELLOW CORVETTE...what a great supercar so far. GM and the USA
> should be proud.
> But it remains to be seen if the car has the greatness of a Porsche.
>
> My 30 years and 800,000 miles of driving and maintaining my two 944's
> myself has been nothing short of spectacular.
> --
>
> joliett
> ______________
> ______________
>
Again - take it is you will, 800K miles of Porsche driving and maintenance
myself - with NEVER a belt broken. Also, I didn't adhere to the scheduled
mileage recommendations for belt changes either...not that I recommend that
to anyone...I only changed the belts when servicing the water pump - or when
I had oil leaking into the rollers and belts through shaft bearing seals -
so sometimes I would say I went 100K miles without belt changing.
I bet it was using that expensive Porsche belt adjusting tool that kept my
belts in such great unbroken shape. I think - not sure - that most Porsche
clubs have one to lend.
Anyway -- I think the 944 - especially the 1983 944 - was perhaps the best
and most reliable car ever built.
And thank you Mr. Noble for your invaluable forum participation.
joliett
______________
______________
"William Noble" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:ccc97$48a4fd53$18...@news.teranews.com...
Whoopee - we agree. Belt requires SOME tension - amount not specified in
manual.
Of course using the gauge is safe. What I was pointing out is that if you
dont' have the gauge, you can do it without the gauge, and I was pointing
out a convenient artifact of the design, in that the balance shaft belt can
pretty much be depended on to fail first. You can tell too tight vs too
loose by inspection - too tight and you get a VERY distinctive whine from
overloaded bearings. Too loose and the belt flaps visibly. 87 and later
have a spring tensioner for timing belt, so you can compare tension on the
balance belt to the timing belt with your finger or a GATES "Clickit" tool
if you need to.
But, my recent Audi experience suggests another caution - the belt DID NOT
break, and on that car the belt is tensioned automatically by a
hydraulically damped spring loaded roller. The failure mode was separation
of 4 to 6 teeth. This is probably age related. The audi belt is under more
load (due to 24 valves and dual cams) than 944s (well, S model excluded) but
the failure mode could certainly happen - so to avoid $$ repair, I suggest
you do not want to wait for a water pump failure to change belts. On my
85.5, with around 300K miles now, the water pump failed at 90K, replaced it
(and belts) and that was it - same water pump is on the car as I put on at
90K. That is way too long to expect critical belts to last. (and no, I
don't drive it, I gave it to my brother)