Question is, who is "looser", Brutus, or you, sir?
WOW! I'm a poet, and didn't know it!
--
Nick Horianopoulos "If you're gonna make her sing Rossini, vulcanize
your genie!"
'97 Trans-Am, slightly hotted up
'96 Suzuki DR350S, very hotted up
web site at: http://www.concentric.net/~greek/
> Well, he seems to have lost his ISP, kinda like Stevie and MacDaddy. Funny
> about that; wonder what they all had in common?
Stevie didn't lose his ISP, he has posted just this week on
rec.autos.tech under the name synth...@aol.com (or something very
similar). He's even signing his name as Steve (with that BF Goodrich
tire dealer crap at the end of his sig) not that we couldn't tell it was
him anyways. It seems he has the sense to at least stay out of our
group. He sure is stirring up shit on rec.autos.tech and the regulars
there seem to know him very well and are also fed up with his bullshit.
Patrick
Dose any one know how to get AOL to kill a acount?
Im sure Stevie will find his way back here, he always does. Any one want
to fund a covert opp to destroy Stevies computer?
Charlie
1) If these guys 'rehabilitate' themselves, why not lay off a little? After
all, what is the objective: to straighten out a wayward member of the
flock, or just have some fun toasting ignorant people? Heck, that's as easy
as shooting fish in a hubcap.
2) If these types actually quit posting, but are still lurking around, why
provoke them by dredging this crap up without cause? "Never speak ill of
the dead."
My $1.00 worth, pre-Clinton-taxes of $0.98
Stoner
sto...@ix.netcom.com
Patrick Gattafoni <ga...@pathcom.com> speculated in article
<331749...@pathcom.com>...
> Googolplex pontificated:
>
> > Well, he seems to have lost his ISP, kinda like Stevie and MacDaddy.
Funny
> > about that; wonder what they all had in common?
>
>
> Stevie didn't lose his ISP, he has posted just this week
snip
>
> Patrick
>
Stoner
sto...@ix.netcom.com
Googolplex <goog...@ripco.com> wrote in article
<5f8qqb$9m7$1...@gail.ripco.com>...
> stonerg (sto...@ix.netcom.com) wrote:
> : Well, flame me if you must, but I gotta weigh in here
snip
> : 1) If these guys 'rehabilitate' themselves, why not lay off a little?
snip
>
> I agree that if one of the "psychos" either straightens up, or
camouflages
> himself so well as to be un-noteworthy, then it's just the same as any
other
> person who posts here. Thing is though, in the real world these things
very
> rarely happen; and if they do, it's not for very long that the charade
plays
> in an innocent manner.
>
> : 2) If these types actually quit posting, but are still lurking around,
why
> : provoke them by dredging this crap up without cause? "Never speak ill
of
> : the dead."
>
> If they're lurking, they are not staying quiet because of any new-found
> benevolent mind-set. Rather, it's because the responses and criticisms
> of a majority of regular posters...calling them on their crap...is
something
> they can't tolerate.
>
> Which is as it should be; we don't need lies, mis-information, spamming,
and
> gratuitous personal insults, in this Newsgroup.
>
>
goog...@ripco.com
>
>
Oh, yes we do, Googs! How-in-the-hell else am I supposed to communicate
with Patrick "the Crybaby Canadian" Gattafoni? :@)
--
Nick Horianopoulos
"If you're gonna make her sing Rossini, vulcanize your genie!"
'97 Trans-Am, slightly hotted up, '96 Suzuki DR350S, very hotted up, web
site at:
http://www.concentric.net/~greek/