> wrote in news:3f0b18b6-e596-4203-b990-
>
55e114a6f...@z8g2000yql.googlegroups.com:
>
> > I know it sounds funny, but the Theory of Relativity sounded funny too
> > a century ago, and now Einstein is equivalent to high IQ. I don't want
> > to brag about my IQ, but this theory of mine makes a lot of sense.The
> > Judeo-Christian viewpoint is that a male god gave birth to everything,
> > while the scientists propose their own Big Bang theory, which kind of
> > makes sense. I mean you must really use all your brainpower to get a
> > hint of what happened in the beginning of times.
>
> > Well, relax. In the beginning there was a Big Vulva that gave birth to
> > everything, big and small, close and distant. I had that inspiration
> > while sitting in the boondocks, just before going to NYC.
>
> > ---------------------------------------------------------
> >
http://webspawner.com/users/BANANAREVOLUTION
>
> The Jesus Myth has an infinte god impregnating a young virgin. You would
> think that shoving an infinitely large cock into a tight Jewish pussy might
> lead to tearing. Current theistic "thought" has Gawd making his member small
> enough by placing it in an ice cold shower and thinking of Margaret Thatcher
> naked. As with all religious doctrine there is a small sect who insist that
> imagining Margaret Thatcher naked is actually erotic and cannot therefore be
> Troo ScripSure.
>
> Catpain Merca
> --
> .
And this confirms my theory that YOU NEED A VULVA to produce something
and that something was Jesus.
God could produce the Universe alone, then Adam & Eve --so claim the
Christians-- but not Jesus.
Again the Big Vulva Theory wins.