> I read about how the audience cheered wildly. ... Do jour-
> nalists assume that everyone is a homosexual?
No. But they are WELL aware that society is fast OUTGROWING
its previous ignorant bigotries regarding homosexuality, and LEARNING
that the sexual orientations are merely variations of NORMALCY,
just like handedness, race, and eye color. And thus, that NO one
is deserving of hateful discrimination over such a TRIVIALITY.
They FURTHER are aware that *straight* ALLIES of the Gay
Community in its quest for across-the-board EQUAL rights in Civil
Rights Movement II against submoronic and cretinous bigots is
about to become the majority, nationwide. (We outnumber the
gays, themselves, by at least 9-1.)
They ALSO are well aware that in the PROCESS of coming to this
realization, society is finally running the LOATHSOME and moronic
RRR Cultists and their sociopathic hate-agendas into the Drain of
Extinction, just short of being tarred and feathered along the way.
Very SOON now, it's goodbye FOREVER to VERY putrid rubbish.
Never to be heard from again. Since those agendas will be
moldering in the same boneyard as those of their EQUALLY-hateful
and ignorant first cousins, the Segregationists.
ROTFL!!!!!
We egalitarians who stand up for personal liberties are LOVING
every SECOND of that!!
<remaining hate-bullcrap flushed>
-- (¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) <drivers...@ymail.com>
http://www.LayoffRemedy.com.com -- Unemployment Solution!
http://www.ChristianEgalitarian.com -- Fight the RRR Cult!
http://spifar.blogspot.com -- Tactics: Defending Human Rights
http://pro-christian.blogspot.com -- Exposing RRR Bigotry
http://www.shadowandillusion.com -- Learn "The LOPAQUA Secret!"
http://www.TravelForPay.org -- Learn how to get PAID to TRAVEL!
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
"Family" -- Key CODE WORD of the RRR Cult
Throughout the RRR Cult, "Family" is ALWAYS a code word
that translates to: "Anti-Personal-liberties."
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
> I read about how the audience cheered wildly. Both of them? Thirty
> people? Do journalists assume that everyone is a homosexual?
Well, as you are a homosexual, and I'm not, why don't you tell me?
Don't even try to claim that you aren't, you wouldn't be so preoccupied
with it if you weren't and neither would you find it so much of a problem.
Is Jeebus you er, how do you put it? "butt-buddy"? You see, that's your
problem, you have an imaginary "um-friend".
--
David Silverman
aa #2208
Defender of Civilisation
if a tree falls in the woods, what are the odds it will land in some bear
shit ?
Not authentic without this signature.
> I read
I doubt that.
You could try simply minding your own business and not worrying about other
people's relationships.
I know, I know, you religious curtain-twitchers simply cannot STAND the
notion of leaving people alone. You HAVE to nag and piss and moan and
screech, because you HAVE to be the center of attention.
Pathetic barbarians.
--
Doc Smartass, BAAWA Knight of Heckling
aa # 1939
Book reviews: http://jw-bookblog.blogspot.com/
Diploma Mill: a religious facility where minds are ground into powder.
> I read
LOL!!!
> about how the audience cheered wildly. Both of them? Thirty
> people?
Then you must REALLY enjoy the hullabaloo about the Republican
teabagging fiasco!! After MONTHS of planning, "hundreds of
thousands" of people showed up in "all 50 states!!" LOL!!!
Most of them were protesting higher taxes while their own taxes are
being slashed!! LMAO!!!
PROOF that we need a LOT more money for EDUCATION!!!
> Do journalists assume that everyone is a homosexual?
Does a journalist's writing about rights for blacks mean that the
journalist is black? Does an OB/GYN's writing about pregnancy mean
that he is pregnant?
Twit.
> Why would
> anyone think that because an unpopular administrator supports deviants
> that his actions would inspire anyone but the misguided?
So the residents of Canada, Spain, Norway, Sweden, the Netherlands,
South Africa, Belgium, Iowa, Vermont, Massachusetts, Connecticut (and
an ever-growing list) are all "misguided"?
Do tell us how.... Especially in light of the fact that most of the
countries mentioned above enjoy a higher standard of living than does
the population of the United States, and the fact that the states
mentioned have a higher standard of living than do those living in the
Bible Belt.
This should be interesting... We're waiting...
> If the gov
> supported amnesty for child pornographers would you have written the
> same report?
> Step out of your bubble reporter. There are a majority of
> us who function as we were designed
You were designed to post hogwash on Usenet?
> and observe deviations with pity
> and contempt.
Jesus would be VERY irritated to hear that.
VERY irritated, indeed.
> Gov. Patterson is blind.. {no pun intended}
That wasn't a pun. Though apparently you enjoy making fun of the
disabled... even if they overcome the disability to the extent that
they become governor of the third most-populated states in the U.S.
Did Jesus make fun of blind people? Would he approve?
I like making fun of shit packing fags, are you a shit packer?
even if they overcome the disability to the extent that
> they become governor of the third most-populated states in the U.S.
>
> Did Jesus make fun of blind people?
I don't remember asking.
> Would he approve?
Ask him.
I'm going to ask Jesus what to do about my TWICHING CLIT! Man I tell
you it twiches UNCUNTROLLABLY!
Meth, you sound HOT! Please see my Google Groups Profile for my pix
and email add'y, hope to here from you soon!
<blush>
This is a forgery.
No, its' really me, Kate, Nursing Practioner.
You're that fag who stalks Katie. Your post
gave you away. Fucking fruitcake!
I'd be interested to know how you know this. PMSL.
> On Apr 19, 10:47 pm, Kate_G <kat...@amorous.com> wrote:
Somebody stole one of your socks!
Maybe because he knows me, ever think of that? I'm the authentic
Kate_G
and my pet queer Scott A. Salberg is the forger/impersonator.
He's not very bright and he thinks usenet will actually fall for his
childish displays of anger and frustration. Only morons with IQ's
equal to their shoe sizes would give credence to the sophomoric
displays of Scott A. Salberg. Do YOU fall into that catagory?
LMAO!! Self-outing!
Proof?
> and my pet queer Scott A. Salberg is the forger/impersonator.
Proof?
> He's not very bright and he thinks usenet will actually fall for his
> childish displays of anger and frustration.
Proof?
> Only morons with IQ's
> equal to their shoe sizes would give credence to the sophomoric
> displays of Scott A. Salberg. Do YOU fall into that catagory?
"catagory"? In a rant about IQs?!
Spell much? (Or are you just trying to "trap" us? <smirk>)
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Doc knows this is fact because Kate is one of his alter egos which he
uses to post under.
We know it's Katie, fag. Are you intoxicated on ass smell gain?
>
> > and my pet queer Scott A. Salberg is the forger/impersonator.
>
> Proof?
>
> > He's not very bright and he thinks usenet will actually fall for his
> > childish displays of anger and frustration.
>
> Proof?
If not true why do you post them? You should know
we can see right through those juvenile displays.
>
> > Only morons with IQ's
> > equal to their shoe sizes would give credence to the sophomoric
> > displays of Scott A. Salberg. Do YOU fall into that catagory?
>
> "catagory"? In a rant about IQs?!
>
> Spell much? (Or are you just trying to "trap" us? <smirk>)
You fell for it just like she said you would. Katie said you made a
living
off of spelling lames because you cannot dispute real facts.
Trapped again, fag.
>
> LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
She mentioned the abuse of exclamation points also.
Good show queer!
Another idiot.
Another idiot.
How's that bait taste, Blobby?
Besides the fact that I know Kate if you examined the profile
any reasonably intelligent person can tell it's not an actual person.
And this fag is known for impersonations and trolling, {amateur but
trolling nonetheless} He also believes you're bobandcarole. Ever
heard of them?
.