Message from discussion KSIC denies the Bible
Received: by 10.224.205.65 with SMTP id fp1mr1826352qab.4.1353015819993;
Thu, 15 Nov 2012 13:43:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.49.130.106 with SMTP id od10mr572691qeb.20.1353015819958; Thu,
15 Nov 2012 13:43:39 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 13:43:39 -0800 (PST)
Injection-Info: 3g2000yqn.googlegroups.com; posting-host=188.8.131.52; posting-account=zW8kxwgAAABrCuDYTbWRR0mwD854eYAP
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_5_7; en-us)
AppleWebKit/530.17 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Safari/530.17,gzip(gfe)
Subject: Re: KSIC denies the Bible
From: Jazzy Belle <fvrn...@yahoo.com>
Injection-Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 21:43:39 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
On Nov 15, 12:53=A0pm, kensmithiscool <kensmithisco...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Nov 15, 12:14 am, Jazzy Belle <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > You've convinced your evil spirits of this. =A0Why am I not surprised=
> > Projection noted.
> Where have I heard that one before. =A0Oh! =A0That's the same comeback
> Kent Garage Burglar Wills uses. =A0Are you his Siamese twin?
The truth remains the truth no matter your childish ad homs. And the
truth about your idol bob larson cannot be covered up.
> > =A0Your idol bob larson himself says Christians can have demons.
> Well don't stop there. What else did BL continue to say about it?
Attempt to distract from your theological error noted. Post edit to
remove your claim about yourself ( "impossible"ksic has demons claim)
to cover your error noted.
In terms of "demons" I do not consider McExorcist bob larson to be an
authoritative source. Contrary to larson's grandiose claims abput
himself, objectively speaking larson is a has been whose "authority"
status on any subject one could name is more hot air and puffery and
no substance. I haven't seen a credible source cite him as an
authoritative reference in the last 15 years.
> >Even =A0in the Bible, Job, being the most
> > devoted to G-d, was allowed by G-d to be the chew toy of Satan,
> > supposedly to test his devotion to G-d. Even one of Jesus' Apostles
> > during the Last Supper was at the very least the sock puppet of Satan,
> > which Jesus recognized.
> Maureen, I can see that you are no doubt in dire need of a good Bible
> study. =A0 You sorely lack the knowledge to mention that Job's
> protection was stripped from God; this would explain why Job and his
> assets were opened up to Satan.
Avoidance of the Last Supper reference noted. Absurd posturing of
college drop out noted.
.> Since God has not stripped me of
REALLY? You, a mortal, are so certain G-d is "protecting" you?
Arrogance and grandiose posturing noted. Cult leader self delusion
noted. Delusions of being specially selected noted.
> I am personally not open to Satan. =A0And with concern to
> Judas -- I assume that is who you alluded to -- it was common
> knowledge among the Gospel writers (that would be: Matthew, Mark, Luke
> and John) that Judas as a betrayer -- as that is how they accurately
> depicted him in the Bible. =A0Judas never even received the body and
> blood! =A0His chosen destiny to eternal punishment is hardly open to
> dispute. =A0 I could go on, but I have no further desire to take you to
> Sunday school on this one. =A0But I will say, you really need to get
> yourself to a seminar for a one-on-one intervention. =A0Don't have the
> guts? =A0BL does offer a Skype option. =A0Which will you choose? =A0Your
> continued neglect to do either is why you remain so screwed up...
Ad hom noted.
Obvious posturing noted. Attempt to bait noted.
You are OC free to email me for a skype meeting, though your track
history is one of cowardice and excuses. As to me "seeking out" bob
larson, note my comment above on his lack of credibility.
Besides, pretty soon Mc Exorcist might be better off traveling north
of his current mansion to deal with the spiritual activities regarding
Kachinas and the Hopi and Dine where if he really was about "spiritual
warfare" hr'd be on the scene of their ceremonies. But larson, coward
that he is, won't walk the walk he claims he does.
Or don't you know what I'm talking about, boobie? Right in your
"territory" therer are people of a race you are bigoted against, doing
for more than two months ceremonies and rituals whete some
participants become Kachinas-- and your idol bob larson ignores such
an obvious "demonic" ( to certain Christians, that is) activity.
> > Why are you supposedly impervious?
> If you knew anything at all about being a warrior for Jesus and how to
> declare your authority in Christ, you wouldn't ask such a short-
> sighted question...
"Warrior for Jesus"? You still selling that bs claim boobie?
Considering your "traveling evangelist" years and your later
hypocritical claim during the Clinton years that only Christians
should be in the military, you shouldn't even pretend you are NOW
some military "warrior"-- coward.
Larson had his draft catd in his wallet during his traveling
"evangelist" years and could have served in the military in a non
combat support role so that years later he would have some credibility
as a former serviceman-- but he didn't do that. As a Christian who
later claimed that only Christians be allowed to serve in the
military, his tour of duty would have given him credibility,. Instead,
his abscense of actual military experience makes his later posturings
and his claim he is now a "general" in the "spiritual warfare army"
look like the arrogant posturing bullshit it is, and an insult to
those who ACTUALLY SERVED IN THE MILITARY.
Ksic, you are a coward, not a "warrior". You insult the brave men and
women who served honorably on your sick fantasy thinking you are equal
> > As opposed to your college drop out, mail order diploma mill, unearned
> > priestly attire wearing idol?
> Oh my. =A0If KS received royalties for every thought of his that you and
> Kent continue to use, KS could have acquired the Sydney Harbour Region
> by now. . .
Ken didn't know about your idol's deceptive attire the exploiter has
been dishonestly wearing for over a year now.
Attempt to distract noted.
> > > your
> > > unintentionally amusing attempt to finger-point as a means to deflect
> > > attention from your longstanding bout with demons is properly noted.
> > Lie and projection noted.
> Another quote from the KentMoe Book of Internet Comebacks??
Ad hom noted. Irony noted.
Your inability to intelligently respond noted.
> =A0> Irony noted. Considering what you've been trying to do to me for
> > -- and failed time and time again-- you yourself play mental games,
> > hypocrite.
> So will you be watching BL and the girls, as they will be featured on
> the National Geographic Channel? =A0 That's Taboo: Devils and Demons...
> set to air next Monday, November 19th. =A0Be sure to check your local
> listings for time.
I feel sympathy for the TEs.
> > > goes without saying that it is impossible to produce offspring with a=
> > > imaginary woman.
> > He has and she is real.
> And yet you've never met Lin and the children. =A0And you are the only
> one who can step forward and back up Kent's imaginary wife and
> children. =A0And we know you are a chronic liar.
> > Not trite as you deceptively and dishonestly represent, as usual. Our
> > responses are calmly based and acknowledging that both you and your
> > shill gaggie are using tactics that both of us recognize as attempts
> > to push our buttons. It can become amusing at times when the motives
> > of you two are obvious. Even better when your retorts show more about
> > yourselves than about us.
> > The fact that Kent and I are both of above average IQ
> You two? =A0I'd agree as long as you figured it in centigrade...