Re: larson video "exorcising" gay "demon"

[yumhuyk]

Moe would prefer the domon Homosexuality to stay in these people, so
they live out a lifetime of A/I/D/S, anonymous gloryhole sex, and
incontinence due to rectal prolapse. She truly looks out for the
society's victims.

yours in Christ,
isamu

[Greegor]

Maureen can't get a date of either gender.

[Father Sky, Mother MOON]

On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 14:41:04 -0700 (PDT)
yumhuyk <wost...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Moe would prefer the domon Homosexuality to stay in these people, so
> they live out a lifetime of A/I/D/S, anonymous gloryhole sex, and
> incontinence due to rectal prolapse. She truly looks out for the
> society's victims.

jealous bitch! Admittedly, the description sounds better then most
lives! But that's the grass is greener on the other side of the ol'
glory hole game!

[yumhuyk]

On Oct 28, 5:13 pm, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Maureen can't get a date of either gender.

Lucky for her these days there are "genderqueers" who are neither.

yours in Christ,
isamu

[Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole]

Sorta Kinda, not quite Right, Eh Wht!
Check the World Around Ya, you Believe they have Absolute Right, to
Prove you a Worthless Peon, or are you one of the PEOPLE, who Forged
America in "Resistance" To, the Aryan's and their Flow of the White
River!

[Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole]

Greegor wrote:

> Maureen can't get a date of either gender.

Can't blame em, she's a Scary Bitch, out to dig her Claws in you for
Laughs over your Grimace at such!

[Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole]

Those you Charge Admittance to and Spend their Lives Around the Glory
Hole, will sell ya nothing but!
However the Statutory Rights, of Shape Shifters, and their ability to LOVE
another, has nothing to do, with what BAR we can Frequent!

[Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole]

yumhuyk wrote:

> On Oct 28, 5:13 pm, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Maureen can't get a date of either gender.
>
> Lucky for her these days there are "genderqueers" who are neither.

Nothing New, Shape Shifters are Historical Fact!
Fact is the Bible says we "Sethians" are the Image of MAN, "TWICE" MADE
by the HAND OF GOD!
Who the Fuck are you?
Some MAN, who can't understand why GOD, told ya to go Fuck Yourself!!

[yumhuyk]

On Oct 29, 9:38 am, Jazzy Belle <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> There is a flurry of blog posts about the gay vid, and I haven't found
> and archived all of them yet (Samhain/Halloween, you know), but from
> what I've seen so far, quite a few people have pegged larson as a
> scammer and a few have noted the creepiness of a 68 year old man with
> teen girls. And they hsven't heard of larson's "freedom fighters" con
> wbere he is trying to lure more teenagers to "support" the TEs.

Yes, its just bizarre that a 68 yo married man would be around his own
daughter, especially when they share the same passion for Christ and
helping people. Its weird only to domon-possessed perverts.

yours in Christ,
isamu

[yumhuyk]

On Oct 29, 2:07 am, K Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 14:41:04 -0700 (PDT), yumhuyk

>
> <wostyn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >Moe would prefer the domon Homosexuality to stay in these people, so
> >they live out a lifetime of A/I/D/S, anonymous gloryhole sex, and
> >incontinence due to rectal prolapse.
>

>      Your personal problems are just that.

>
> >She truly looks out for the
> >society's victims.
>

>      At least you're able to admit she's tying to look out for you and
> others like you.
>
> --
> "I look like I'm in the Harry Potter movie."
>      -- Rick Harrison (Pawn Stars)

Your childish and content-free insults contribute nothing to the
newsgroup. Scram.

yours in Christ,
isamu

[Greegor]

Isamu > Yes, its just bizarre that a 68 yo married man would be around
his own
Isamu > daughter, especially when they share the same passion for
Christ and
Isamu > helping people.   Its weird only to domon-possessed perverts.

Moe's been at this BL hate campaign for
TWENTY SEVEN YEARS
so you'd think she would have found some
damning evidence on BL by now.

All she can do is jeer and hate every
new thing BL does or has.

She is DEVOTED to BL!

[kensmithiscool]

Well they say everyone has a part to play in this life :) Maureen is
really to be pitied -- A harmless crackpot in desperate need of
deliverance. And BL is the only one who can rid the forces of
darkness who lay claim to her soul. Her efforts to stir up a storm
between BL and other parties; the volume of BL memorabilia she has
accumulated over the last two decades; the sundry of socks Maureen has
birthed to create the illusion that her anti-BL klan of offenders is
more than a one-hag-band -- all of those things amount to a cry for
help. Daddy Frank didn't care enough about her, and so Maureen
appears to see that daddy figure in BL. It's possible, in a twisted
sense, that she sees BL as much, much more than that. This might
explain her seemingly bizarre fetish to revisit her hobby of
connecting BL to porn, when there is absolutely no such evidence --
particularly to submit to a court of law.

It could be that Maureen is a mite pissy that Kenny-poo didn't invite
her to join him on his recent excursion through Scottsdale :D Am I
close, table cakes? If Maureen and Ken couldn't get over it, those
two would have absolutely nothing in common with one another. Maureen
is mad about BL, and Kenny is mad about this http://goo.gl/Ec7LY

[kensmithiscool]

On Oct 30, 3:12 am, K Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote:


> >Maureen is
> >really to be pitied --  A harmless crackpot in desperate need of
> >deliverance.   And BL is the only one who can rid the forces of
> >darkness who lay claim to her soul.
>

>      You are a good little cultist.


You are a good little garage-burglar-perv.



> Jesus can rid any forces of darkness that may have laid claim her
> to her soul,


That goes without saying. I'm not so arrogant to assume that the
audience doesn't already know that much...


>not you


I never claimed to, poop-hole...



>(you did present, twice, that you are Bob
> Lar$on).



I can not and will not be responsible for your grand delusions
predicated on an unhealthy BL obsession that you allow to remain
untreated...





>      It's not surprising that you don't agree with this.


Kent, you are no doubt a skid mark on the underwear of society. Seek
professional help...

> >Her efforts to stir up  a storm
> >between BL and other parties; the volume of BL memorabilia she has
> >accumulated over the last two decades; the sundry of socks Maureen has
> >birthed to create the illusion that her anti-BL klan of offenders is
> >more than a one-hag-band -- all of those things amount to a cry for
> >help.  Daddy Frank didn't care enough about her,
>

>      Be careful. Greg has already claimed Moe's dad died and that she
> inherited his estate. MID available upon request


You have already made a lot of claims about you and Janet and Fred's
real estate that doesn't comport with the indisputable, documented
evidence. MID/url available upon request.



> Of course, Greg has been caught in so many lies, he may not care
> that you're exposing another. Unless you are lying, of course.


It takes one to know one...

> >This might
> >explain her seemingly bizarre fetish to revisit her hobby of
> >connecting BL to porn, when there is absolutely no such evidence --
> >particularly to submit to a court of law.
>

>      Moe has stated others have made the claim. She's been very open
> that she has nothing but the claims of others regarding your partner
> in adultery (Matthew 19:9, Mark 10:11, Luke 16:18) bring porn into
> your office, Bob (unless you lied when you presented you are Bob).


Unfortunately for her, there is no credible evidence for WoodsOfMoe to
point to. She orginally purloined that whopper from the BLFC, which
long ago backed away from the scurrilous allegation.

> >It could be that Maureen is a mite pissy that Kenny-poo didn't invite
> >her to join him on his recent excursion through Scottsdale :D
>

>      Your OBSESSION with a man who hasn't posted in several years
> isn't healthy



Oh now, you know that's just not true. http://goo.gl/KJw3A




>, Bob.


Your obsession with a man who doesn't appear to have ever posted here
isn't healthy

> >Am I
> >close, table cakes?   If Maureen and Ken couldn't get over it, those
> >two would have absolutely nothing in common with one another.  Maureen
> >is mad about BL, and Kenny is mad about this  http://goo.gl/Ec7LY
>

>      Something from nearly 10 years ago?


It's a true today as it was then. Truth doesn't have an expiration
date. And Kenny still isn't an attorney...


> Unlike you, Ken is able to
> move on. As your OBSESSION with Ken proves, you are unable.


Oh my. http://goo.gl/KJw3A


> Accept that you aren't as important to Ken as you prove he is to
> you.


Of all people, why would I do that? http://goo.gl/KJw3A

[Greegor]

KBW > Be careful. Greg has already claimed Moe's
KBW > dad died and that she inherited his estate.
KBW > MID available upon request.

Still telling outright lies about what I CLAIMED
and playing games with MID's, Kent?

KBW > Something from nearly 10 years ago? Unlike
KBW > you, Ken is able to move on. As your
KBW > OBSESSION with Ken proves, you are
KBW > unable. Accept that you aren't as important
KBW > to Ken as you prove he is to you.
KBW > If there is such a thing as a demon of
KBW > obsession, you have offered undeniable
KBW > evidence that you have one.

It's strange how Kent asserts that Ken Smith
has moved on about BL, while Moe has recently
asserted that Smith is still active in the hate
campaign, just not on usenet.

Why did you cut the cross-post list so short, Kent?

Was something KSIC said not to your liking? LOL

[Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole]

Family is Family!
Childless Mothers, Shape Shifters, Sethians, are not "YOURS" to JUDGE!
Regardless of what the Anglican's did during the Protestant Reformation
circa 1870 AD!
Bible, say's there is a Curse on People who Alter the Bible, especially to
Take Away Peoples Rights before GOD!

[Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole]

yumhuyk wrote:

> On Oct 29, 2:07 am, K Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 14:41:04 -0700 (PDT), yumhuyk
> >
> > <wostyn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >Moe would prefer the domon Homosexuality to stay in these people, so
> > >they live out a lifetime of A/I/D/S, anonymous gloryhole sex, and
> > >incontinence due to rectal prolapse.
> >
> > Your personal problems are just that.
> >
> > >She truly looks out for the
> > >society's victims.
> >

NOT!
If she understood em as Victims, she be doing the Nancy Sinatra on em with
the Gang!

[Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole]

Greegor wrote:

> Isamu > Yes, its just bizarre that a 68 yo married man would be around
> his own
> Isamu > daughter, especially when they share the same passion for
> Christ and
> Isamu > helping people. Its weird only to domon-possessed perverts.
>
> Moe's been at this BL hate campaign for
> TWENTY SEVEN YEARS

I Ain't BL so the Assaults on ME, are evidence of a far worse Compulsion,
that some minor singularity!

[Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole]

kensmithiscool wrote:

> On Oct 29, 8:07 pm, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Isamu > Yes, its just bizarre that a 68 yo married man would be around
> > his own
> > Isamu > daughter, especially when they share the same passion for
> > Christ and
> > Isamu > helping people. Its weird only to domon-possessed perverts.
> >
> > Moe's been at this BL hate campaign for
> > TWENTY SEVEN YEARS
> > so you'd think she would have found some
> > damning evidence on BL by now.
> >
> > All she can do is jeer and hate every
> > new thing BL does or has.
> >
> > She is DEVOTED to BL!
>
> Well they say everyone has a part to play in this life :)

Yep, we're all stuck in Purgatory until someone opens the Doors to let
people out!

[Jazzy Belle]

Lies and ad homs noted.

I should note that you, ksic/bob larson, a few months back, were here
threatening me with jail, etc, just before you had your heart attack
and claimed "Jezebel"attaced you in ways you claimed you could not
reveal to your followers. Pot, kettle, old man.

You forgot that the real author of "Dead Air" said that the only parts
of the novel you actually wrote were the disgusting graphic child porn
scenes.

It would be interesting to put wife #2 Laura on the witness stand
after a few ex BLM eyewitnesses testify to see what she had to day.

A number of people have commented how sleazy it looks for a 68 year
old man to parade about with teenage girls.

BTW boobie, I know where you "borrowed" your "Freedom Fighters" lure
from. Shame on you for imitatinganother "deliverace minister's" little
act. :-D

Moe

[Jazzy Belle]

On Oct 29, 11:00 pm, kensmithiscool <kensmithisco...@gmail.com> wrote:

Hey boobie, does this have anything to do with your constant contact
annoncement on Twitter that Lifetime cancelled your series?

BTW boobie, thank you for the good news you twitted. It adds to the
nice Samhain I am having.

Moe

[Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole]

> Lies and ad homs noted.
>
> I should note that you, ksic/bob larson, a few months back, were here
> threatening me with jail, etc, just before you had your heart attack
> and claimed "Jezebel"attaced you in ways you claimed you could not

> reveal to your followers. Pot, kettle, old man.The Magic of Karmic Truth,
> doesn't exist in their Mytho's, otherwise they would be WRONG!

[Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole]

> Hey boobie, does this have anything to do with your constant contact
> annoncement on Twitter that Lifetime cancelled your series?
>
> BTW boobie, thank you for the good news you twitted. It adds to the
> nice Samhain I am having.
>
> Moe

New Yorkers enjoyed their Suntans to the Trans Vals Disaster last year, so
what else is New?

[K Wills]

On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 14:17:11 -0700 (PDT), Jazzy Belle
<fvr...@yahoo.com> wrote:

[...]

>> It could be that Maureen is a mite pissy that Kenny-poo didn't invite
>> her to join him on his recent excursion through Scottsdale :D � Am I
>> close, table cakes? � If Maureen and Ken couldn't get over it, those
>> two would have absolutely nothing in common with one another. �Maureen
>> is mad about BL, and Kenny is mad about this �http://goo.gl/Ec7LY
>
>Hey boobie, does this have anything to do with your constant contact
>annoncement on Twitter that Lifetime cancelled your series?

While it's good news that Lar$on's con won't be made available to
the gullible, I honestly would like to see the remaining episodes of
his TV show.
I guess I need to accept that no one is going to air his acts of
deception.

--
"I could have been ambassador to Moscow by now. Maybe even Private
Secretary. Instead, I'm watching a dinosaur trash my office..."

[Jazzy Belle]

On Nov 1, 5:41 am, K Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 14:17:11 -0700 (PDT), Jazzy Belle
>

> <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> >> It could be that Maureen is a mite pissy that Kenny-poo didn't invite
> >> her to join him on his recent excursion through Scottsdale :D   Am I
> >> close, table cakes?   If Maureen and Ken couldn't get over it, those
> >> two would have absolutely nothing in common with one another.  Maureen
> >> is mad about BL, and Kenny is mad about this  http://goo.gl/Ec7LY
>
> >Hey boobie, does this have anything to do with your constant contact
> >annoncement on Twitter that Lifetime cancelled your series?
>
>      While it's good news that Lar$on's con won't be made available to
> the gullible, I honestly would like to see the remaining episodes of
> his TV show.

Agreed, same here.

>      I guess I need to accept that no one is going to air his acts of
> deception.
>

I am amused at his melodrama about it. His blog, twitter, facebook and
online newsletter claiming he was "shocked", an associate of his was
"stunned", and OC claims about what he says were gays targeting him
( usual old lies he pulled during his radio show days about "obscene
phone calls") are melodramatic and unrealistic, but his followers lap
his vomitus up.

KSIC popping in with two lameass posts seems to have occurrred soon
after he claims as Larson he was notified of his series' cancellation.
Not very smart if BL doesn't want evidence to show he's KSIC, but then
larson without his support followers would still be on his traveling
evangelist circuit.

Moe

[kensmithiscool]

On Nov 1, 8:55 am, Jazzy Belle <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> I am amused at his melodrama about it. His blog, twitter, facebook and
> online newsletter claiming he was "shocked", an associate of his was
> "stunned", and OC claims about what he says were gays targeting him
> ( usual old lies he pulled during his radio show days about "obscene
> phone calls") are melodramatic and unrealistic, but his followers lap
> his vomitus up.

I hear there is a healthy campaign effort to get the Real Exorcist to
air on Lifetime. . .

> KSIC popping in with two lameass posts seems to have occurrred soon
> after he claims as Larson he was notified of his series' cancellation.

Do you have a prescription for your paranoia?

> Not very smart if BL doesn't want evidence to show he's KSIC,

It isn't smart to pop in with commentary about a "viral video" days
before Lifetime announced they were putting the series on hold,
Maureen McAllister. Is it any surprise that when news concerning BL
in a negative manner is announced, Maureen is there... right on cue.
Now who could have informed the gay community about a 15 year old
exorcism video? Someone with a lot of time on her hands and with an
axe to grind no doubt.

The good news is the facts are still coming forward. My guess is that
when they have all the facts , and when the source who contacted the
gay community is identified, Lifetime will realize this was another
planned, smear tactic on BL by the usual cast of characters. The
video is really quite innocent.




> Moe
>

[Jazzy Belle]

On Nov 1, 12:34 pm, kensmithiscool <kensmithisco...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Nov 1, 8:55 am, Jazzy Belle <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > I am amused at his melodrama about it. His blog, twitter, facebook and
> > online newsletter claiming he was "shocked", an associate of his was
> > "stunned", and OC claims about what he says were gays targeting him
> > ( usual old lies he pulled during his radio show days about "obscene
> > phone calls") are melodramatic and unrealistic, but his followers lap
> > his vomitus up.
>
> I hear there is a healthy campaign effort to get the Real Exorcist to
> air on Lifetime. . .

Good luck with that, old man. You have a nice little list of TV
broadcast attempts that ended up failures. You made the mistake of
claiming TRE is a "new" series when in fact it is not. One of boobie's
lies and distortions of fact.

The point still remains that Lifetime did the right thing in
cancelling TRE.

>
> > KSIC popping in with two lameass posts seems to have occurrred soon
> > after he claims as Larson he was notified of his series' cancellation.
>
> Do you have a prescription for your paranoia?

Ad hom noted. Your posts were lame ass and typical of what BL does
time and time again. Like your attack on Fr. Ashcraft, for example.

>
> > Not very smart if BL doesn't want evidence to show he's KSIC,
>
> It isn't smart to pop in with commentary about a "viral video" days
> before Lifetime announced they were putting the series on hold,
> Maureen McAllister.  Is it any surprise that when news concerning BL
> in a negative manner is announced, Maureen is there... right on cue.
> Now who could have informed the gay community about a 15 year old
> exorcism video?   Someone with a lot of time on her hands and with an
> axe to grind no doubt.

Distortions and lies noted. You give me too much credit, boobie. In
this case the vid became viral by gay and atheist web sites and blogs,
and I had nothing to do with it. I found out about it last week. As
for bad news about BL and I'm "there" as you claim, you know as well
as I that I am a critic of McExorcist, not your PR rah rah publicity
agent.

As for "grind" I sharpen chai saw links, not axes. You know, stuff
that country people do and you avoid as much as possible. Honest work.

>
> The good news is the facts are still coming forward.  My guess is that
> when they have all the facts , and when the source who contacted the
> gay community is identified, Lifetime will realize this was another
> planned, smear tactic on BL by the usual cast of characters.  The
> video is really quite innocent.

Paranoia, boobie? Yes I know you are looking for someone to blame. BTW
nice repeating what you said yesterday, Bob. As for the "facts coming
forward", I welcome that. The FACTS, not your bs. I want to thank
those involved. If you, hurt ego and your drama queen whining, are
trying to get proof for a lawsuit against Lifetime, be sure to check
your lawyer to make sure you didn't misrepresent anything to Lifetime,
omit or distort what you told them in your sell.

You just can't accept the fact that something you recorded that was
anti gay was shown to people and they acted as is their free speech
right, to protest a network friendly to LGBT people airing something
made by an exploitive bigot. You lost--again. Accept it like an adult.

If I wanted to pass on a vid online showing how crass, crude and
homophobic you are, I know of a much better example than the gay
exorcism video. Remember the poor transsexual you verbally went after
on your radio show-- and sold the video to people? Remember the first
" questiion" you asked her?

You are trying to whitewash your past in your current reinvention.
Too bad you recorded and sold to the public examples of your less than
honorable behavior and utterances. I still find it incomprehensible
that if you have a competent staff that no one advised you to not
release your smug reaction to Steve Irwin's death.

Boobie, if I was as serious and active against you as you imagine, I
would have made available considerably MORE DAMNING examples, both
video and audio, of your various prejudices and bigotries than the
"gay exorcism" vid.

Sorry old man, I'm not the impetus for the viral vid or the complaint
campaign that resulted in the network doing the right thing. You've
read my FB community page comments. You know I would have liked all 8
of your exploitive series to be aired. That contradicts your claim
about me here.

Considering your attempt and failure to get DA into a movie, you
should have figured out by now how the entertainment media operates.
Even a great author like Clive Barker had an uphill battle every time
with Hollywood. What you've been experiencing in the last 15-18 years
is NORMAL. So grow up, man up and accept the reality that outside of
your cult and your followers, you are a guppy in the shark tank.
Moe

[Greegor]

KSIC > You are a good little garage-burglar-perv.

Moe wrote
> Did you notice ksick is focusing on sex matters in his current spate?
> Calling you a "perv," which is short for sex pervert,

It's short for pervert, which may or may not be sexual.

Interestingly, "perversion" meaning bending twisting
and distorting is an apt term for Kent and you, really.
Like the KOOKS group, you two are constantly
trying to bend or distort reality to serve YOUR needs.

> is interesting
> because I've yet to see anything from you indicating anything regarding
> his scurrulous claim of your alleged sexual perversion.

Do you seriously want to bring up the word scurrilous
in a complaint about somebody else, Maureen?

scur·ril·ous/ˈskərələs/Adjective: 1.Making or spreading scandalous
claims about someone with the intention of damaging their reputation:
"a scurrilous attack".
2.Humorously insulting.

You've spent TWENTY SEVEN YEARS
obsessively stalking and harassing BL
and you haven't found anything damning
(which you admit) so all you've been doing
is pretty much DEFINED as scurrilous.

Jeering, griping, and now gloating.

That's all you've got to show for your
TWENTY SEVEN YEARS of obsessively
stalking and harassing BL.

Pathetic really.

[Jazzy Belle]

BTW boobie, I LOVE your today's constant contact about gays and how
intolerant you claim they were to you. Aside from your old BLM era
claim of "obscene phone calls" you CLAIM your "church" employees had,
the irony if you with YOUR intolerances, including against LGBT people
and the numerous examples I can cite of your bigotry against Native
Americans whining about being, as you claim, a "victim of intolerance"
reaches from irony to outright hypocrisy.

I can list a few examples from your BLM era alone where you exhibited
considerable intolerance of various grouos of people. Too bad you also
showed some racism in certain of your books. Or that audios and videis
if you exist that show your current claim to be highly hypocritical.

Keep on helping me, old man. I appreciate your act of being
"persecuted" by gays that you in the past hated with a passion.

Good job!

Moe

[Greegor]

KBW > My sex life isn't all that exciting.
KBW > That it's something about which
KBW > Lar$on has an interest is telling.

KSIC may not necessarily be referring to
your sex life with your left hand, Kent.
He may be referring to the way you keep
attempting to project your perverted lies.

[Greegor]

KBW > Be careful. Greg has already claimed Moe's
KBW > dad died and that she inherited his estate.
KBW > MID available upon request.

G > Still telling outright lies about what I CLAIMED
G > and playing games with MID's, Kent?

Kent wrote
> I note you didn't ask for the MID to be posted.
> Since I often expose your deeply rooted psychological NEED to lie
> with MIDs, your trying to avoid it comes as no surprise to me.

Could you please diagram that sentence, Kent?
It appears you are claiming that I tell lies with MIDs.

KBW > Something from nearly 10 years ago?  Unlike
KBW > you, Ken is able to move on. As your
KBW > OBSESSION with Ken proves, you are
KBW > unable.  Accept that you aren't as important
KBW > to Ken as you prove he is to you.
KBW > If there is such a thing as a demon of
KBW > obsession, you have offered undeniable
KBW > evidence that you have one.

Greg wrote

> It's strange how Kent asserts that Ken Smith
> has moved on about BL, while Moe has recently
> asserted that Smith is still active in the hate
> campaign, just not on usenet.

Kent wrote
> What is the MID for this assertion, Greg?
> And since, outside of your deeply rooted psychological NEED to
> lie, my comment was in regards to Usenet (Lar$on isn't posting about
> Ken on the Facebook page), my comment remains 100% accurate.

G > Why did you cut the cross-post list so short, Kent?

KBW > Because I wanted to.
KBW > Why are you so often COMPELLED to add to the list so often?

I did not start the crosspost list.
But I suspect you are cutting it short for manipulative reasons.

G > Was something KSIC said not to your liking?   LOL

Kent Bradley Wills, DOB Jan 8, 1969 wrote
> Not to the mentally sound.  As with everything, you will not see
> it as the mentally sound will.

[Greegor]

They cancelled ForeverKnight long ago too, Maureen.
Did it stop you from obsessing about it FOR DECADES?

[kensmithiscool]

On Nov 1, 5:34 pm, Jazzy Belle <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> > I hear there is a healthy campaign effort to get the Real Exorcist to
> > air on Lifetime. . .
>
> Good luck with that, old man. You have a nice little list of TV
> broadcast attempts that ended up failures.

*I* have? That's news to me. I wasn't aware that I ever had a
television broadcast...

> You made the mistake of
> claiming TRE is a "new" series when in fact it is not.

BL did no such thing. It's new in the sense that it's new to an
American audience. You act as if the series was filmed in 1850...

> The point still remains that Lifetime did the right thing in
> cancelling TRE.

Honestly, I think Lifetime did the right thing. BTW, I want to
correct you here - It wasn't cancelled. Lifetime received a barrage
of complaints about a so-called "anti-homosexual" video by some
Christian guy they happen to be unfamiliar with. While most of those
complaints came from people who never saw the video, the chose to
react on emotion and under the instruction of LGBT activists. I can't
speak for BL, but I do to an extent fault those who blindly reacted.
Lifetime felt it was best to put the show on hold until the air
cleared and had more information. In this day and age, Lifetime caved
to political correctness without having all the facts. That's
understandable.

> > > Not very smart if BL doesn't want evidence to show he's KSIC,
>
> > It isn't smart to pop in with commentary about a "viral video" days
> > before Lifetime announced they were putting the series on hold,
> > Maureen McAllister.  Is it any surprise that when news concerning BL
> > in a negative manner is announced, Maureen is there... right on cue.
> > Now who could have informed the gay community about a 15 year old
> > exorcism video?   Someone with a lot of time on her hands and with an
> > axe to grind no doubt.
>
> Distortions and lies noted. You give me too much credit, boobie. In
> this case the vid became viral by gay and atheist web sites and blogs,
> and I had nothing to do with it.

BL's ministry isn't involved with the alternative lifetstyle, so there
would be no reason for the gay community to cross paths. BL isn't a
threat to the gay community and never has been. You spend time daily
at BL's various social media outlets. So you surely read BL's
explanation of the man in the video and the homosexual context to it.
The gay community is either misinformed and didn't see the video, or
deliberately showing their Christian intolerance. My money is on the
former. As to you not having anything to do with it, time will tell.
But even you would have to admit that the awkward timing of recent
events coupled with your documented, unfortunate online comments and
misconduct testify against you...

> you know as well
> as I that I am  a critic of McExorcist, not your PR rah rah publicity
> agent.

27 years of your life have been fixated on BL. Is this normal or
nuts?

> As for the "facts coming forward", I welcome that.

That's quite a personal interest you have there...

> I  want to thank those involved.

Intriguing statement. Do you expect "those involved" to credit you
for their effort? :)

> trying to get proof for a lawsuit against Lifetime

I can't imagine BL filing suit against Lifetime when there appears to
be other fish to fry. Lifetime did the right thing. It was an
understandable business decision without all the facts. BL's agent,
production team and Lifetime didn't come this far to have the venture
become torpedoed without a full, accurate investigation.

> You just can't accept the fact that something you recorded that was
> anti gay was shown to people and they acted as is their free speech
> right, to protest a network friendly to LGBT people airing something
> made by an exploitive bigot. You lost--again. Accept it like an adult.

But BL never recorded an anti-gay anything. No reasonably impartial
person who has viewed the video will arrive at an anti-gay deduction.
Accept it like an adult...

> Boobie, if I was as serious and active against you as you imagine, I
> would have made available considerably MORE DAMNING examples, both
> video and audio, of your various prejudices and bigotries than the
> "gay exorcism" vid.

I'm not aware of BL ever having extolled such prejudices and
bigotries. Since there isn't an example to present, end of story. . .

> Sorry old man, I'm not the impetus for the viral vid or the complaint
> campaign that resulted in the network doing the right thing. You've
> read my FB community page comments. You know I would have liked all 8
> of your exploitive series to be aired.

But in the same breath, you said Lifetime did the right thing. How
much booze have you consumed today?

> What you've been experiencing in the last 15-18 years
> is NORMAL.  So grow up, man up and accept the reality that outside of
> your cult and your followers, you are a guppy in the shark tank.
> Moe

Moeron, BL sealed the deal. It's unfortunate that a group was
intentionally misled and used to a point of causing an emotional
reaction which prevented so many disappointed viewers to miss out on
their new favorite series this week. I know I was sure disappointed
when I foud out it wasn't going to air Halloween night. I have a
feeling this unfortunate misunderstanding will get settled.

[K Wills]

On Thu, 1 Nov 2012 17:52:39 -0700 (PDT), Greegor <gree...@gmail.com>
wrote:



I see you're admitting defeat by changing the group list. When
Dan did so, you claimed it was PROOF (emphasis yours) that he was
admitting defeat.
How does it feel to once again admit you've lost, Greg? And have
you ever tried anything that did not result in total failure? Anything
at all?

>KBW > My sex life isn't all that exciting.
>KBW > That it's something about which
>KBW > Lar$on has an interest is telling.
>
>KSIC may not necessarily be referring to
>your sex life with your left hand, Kent.

Do you often think of men masturbating, or is it only me that you
dream about?
It's accepted that your OBSESSION with me is sexual. As such,
your offering more PROOF of it is not necessary. It's nice that you
feel COMPELLED to offer it, but know that since no one is trying to
counter the TRUTH about your OBSESSION, it's not required.

>He may be referring to the way you keep
>attempting to project your perverted lies.

Since I offer no lies, your deception fails.
You've never explained how it feels to FAIL at everything you
try, Greg. Will you do so now?

A select number of items that really are about Gregory Scott "Piggly
Wiggly" Hanson (They are so accurate, Greg compared them the comment
that water is wet):

Title: ST VS GREGORY HANSON
(DOB 05/22/1959)
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 04/10/1996
Comments: CT 1 OWI 1ST
OTHER CITATION 04/10/1996
Comments: CT 2 SPEED
Disposition Status
GUILTY PLEA/DEFAULT

"That's the chick, but not the pic, zipperhead!"
Greg "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson proving his bigotry towards Asians, by
attacking my first wife (deceased).
http://www.rsdb.org/search?q=zipperhead

Me: "I suspect your stalking is due to the use and abuse of illegal
drugs, Greg. Is the reason for your stalking the members of
alt.friends due to the use and abuse of illegal drugs?

Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson, wife beater and child abuser:
"Of course."

"My family's case is for Neglect, but we are treated
in virtually every regard as child abusers, marked on
the Child Abuse registry, for example."
-- Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson, wife beater and child
abuser

" ... But there ought to be conferences and studies on how to curb
minority overpopulation, repatriate minorities abroad, imprison more
minorities, increase use of the death penalty and divest minorities of
the power they have usurped over us in recent years. That would
address the most pressing problems of our day. ... "
April 2000, Gregory Hanson
http://www.nationalist.org/ATW/2000/040101.html#Hanson

Me: Your OBESESSION with a man named Frank is not healthy, Greg. Let
your shrink, no matter his/her actual title, know about this at your
next session.

Greg: He's YOUR Daddy!

Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson admitting, indirectly, that his
previous claim regarding who my dad were lies in Message-ID:
<6e5bf51d-58de-4ef8...@o8g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>

As of Friday, October 12, 2012:

SMALL CLAIMS ORIGINAL NOTICE
Comments: OPA $2805.04
COPIES TO PA
VERIFICATION OF ACCOUNT

JUDGEMENT DEFAULT
Comments: JUDGMENT AGAINST GREGORY HANSON FOR $2805.04
+ INTEREST AT 7.271% FROM 8/6/98 & $45.00 COSTS.

Comments: NOTE OF GARN/NOTE TO DEFT SERV 9/24/98 BY WCSD
TO SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT (ED POLKERS) FOR GREG HANSON
FEES $35.60

Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson has a Garnishment order against
him. There is nothing to even suggest any of the money legally owed
has been paid. The SoL on the order has likely expired, but Greg still
can't risk getting a job due to it.

Me: Or are you claiming "The Letter Poster" is one of your MANY sock
puppets?

Greg: ding!

Gregory Scott Hanson openly admits that he uses sock puppets. You
may see my asking about his admission here:

http://snurl.com/greg_sock

[K Wills]

On Thu, 1 Nov 2012 18:01:45 -0700 (PDT), Greegor <gree...@gmail.com>
wrote:


Post edits restored to the original context.
Has your altering the context via post edits ever worked for you,
Greg? I've asked you this many times, each time you've tried it in
fact, but you've never answered.

>KBW > Be careful. Greg has already claimed Moe's
>KBW > dad died and that she inherited his estate.
>KBW > MID available upon request.
>
>G > Still telling outright lies about what I CLAIMED
>G > and playing games with MID's, Kent?
>
>Kent wrote
>> I note you didn't ask for the MID to be posted.
>> Since I often expose your deeply rooted psychological NEED to lie
>> with MIDs, your trying to avoid it comes as no surprise to me.
>
>Could you please diagram that sentence, Kent?

Yes, I could. Thank you for enquiring as to my abilities.

>It appears you are claiming that I tell lies with MIDs.

Not to the mentally sound.

I am claiming, and accurately so, that I can PROVE you the liar
you are with MIDs. In fact, I've done so ever since you stated you
are able to make use of MIDs with Google. Of course, each time I do
so your ability suddenly vanishes.

>
>KBW > Something from nearly 10 years ago?  Unlike
>KBW > you, Ken is able to move on. As your
>KBW > OBSESSION with Ken proves, you are
>KBW > unable.  Accept that you aren't as important
>KBW > to Ken as you prove he is to you.
>KBW > If there is such a thing as a demon of
>KBW > obsession, you have offered undeniable
>KBW > evidence that you have one.
>
>Greg wrote
>> It's strange how Kent asserts that Ken Smith
>> has moved on about BL, while Moe has recently
>> asserted that Smith is still active in the hate
>> campaign, just not on usenet.
>
>Kent wrote
>> What is the MID for this assertion, Greg?

Greg?
Shall everyone reading accept that your claim was another of your
MANY drug induced lies?

>> And since, outside of your deeply rooted psychological NEED to
>> lie, my comment was in regards to Usenet (Lar$on isn't posting about
>> Ken on the Facebook page), my comment remains 100% accurate.
>

Greg?

>G > Why did you cut the cross-post list so short, Kent?
>
>KBW > Because I wanted to.
>KBW > Why are you so often COMPELLED to add to the list so often?
>
>I did not start the crosspost list.

Whereas the thread started with Moe's post (Message-ID:
<2e28dda2-18dc-49c0...@c17g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>)
to alt.fan.bob-larson only, your attempt to dishonestly claim
innocence fails.
But don't take my word for it. Check the list of MIDs and see for
yourself that your deceptive presentation of innocence has been
exposed.
What's most sad is that you must have known I would expose your
deception. Since you've never had one slip by me, you couldn't have
though I wouldn't catch this one.
How does one as stone cold STUPID as you PROVE yourself to be
survive in the world, Greg?

>But I suspect you are cutting it short for manipulative reasons.
>

My restoring it to the original can't, to the mentally sound, be
seen as manipulative. As with EVERYTHING in your life, YM will V.
Let your mental health care professional know about your delusion
at your next session.

>G > Was something KSIC said not to your liking?   LOL
>
>Kent Bradley Wills, DOB Jan 8, 1969 wrote

Whereas such a person has never posted, your lie fails.

>> Not to the mentally sound.  As with everything, you will not see
>> it as the mentally sound will.

According to you, the lack of a denial is a tacit admission that
the claim is true.
Thank you for admitting that you are mentally ill. Again.
Let your shrink know that you are making some progress.

[Jazzy Belle]

http://foreverknightfa.livejournal.com/138907.html

Moe

[Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole]

Greegor wrote:

> KSIC > You are a good little garage-burglar-perv.
>
> Moe wrote
> > Did you notice ksick is focusing on sex matters in his current spate?
> > Calling you a "perv," which is short for sex pervert,

Different than Normal

[Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole]

Jazzy Belle wrote:

> On Nov 1, 6:34 pm, Jazzy Belle <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > On Nov 1, 12:34 pm, kensmithiscool <kensmithisco...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > It isn't smart to pop in with commentary about a "viral video" days
> > > before Lifetime announced they were putting the series on hold,
> > > Maureen McAllister. Is it any surprise that when news concerning BL
> > > in a negative manner is announced, Maureen is there... right on cue.
> > > Now who could have informed the gay community about a 15 year old
> > > exorcism video?

Maybe a surge of interest from My Side.
You brought up a subject we didn't know, so we checked it out!
If Fags didn't fight Back, Mars, wouldn't be the God of War, Lugh, wouldn't be
the Hero, Krishna, wouldn't have known Arjuna. . . . . . . .

[Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole]

Greegor wrote:

> KBW > My sex life isn't all that exciting.
> KBW > That it's something about which
> KBW > Lar$on has an interest is telling.
>
> KSIC may not necessarily be referring to
> your sex life with your left hand, Kent.

Maybe he can't commit, and likes having Sex with Strangers!

[Lady Azure, Baroness of the North Pole]

Greegor wrote:

>
> G > Why did you cut the cross-post list so short, Kent?
>
> KBW > Because I wanted to.
> KBW > Why are you so often COMPELLED to add to the list so often?
>
> I did not start the crosspost list.
> But I suspect you are cutting it short for manipulative reasons.

Considered a Troll Offense to cp more than 5 ng's at Once!

[kensmithiscool]

On Nov 2, 2:39 am, Jazzy Belle <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> > *I* have?  That's news to me.  I wasn't aware that I ever had a
> > television broadcast...
>

> Quit the pretense. You are Bob Larson, unless you lied--twice.


Where did I lie twice? Two links please...



> BTW if you are going to try to sell the "obsession" lie about Kent a d
> me, you might want to think about why your screen name includes the
> name of a man that has't posted on usenet for years and your obsessiin
> about me combined with your amusing "praise bob larson" act at every
> opportunity.



What other name shall I go by? This is the name everyone knows me
by. I'm not like you with various socks...

> > BL did no such thing.  It's new in the sense that it's new to an
> > American audience.  You act as if the series was filmed in 1850...
>

> Lie noted. Four eps were aired on the SyFy network.


But not 8. This means half are new. And 8 are new to Lifetime's
viewers. Most people aren't like you Maureen; they haven't been on
BL's trail for 27 years. The series is new!




>larson billed it as a new serirs, period, not new series in America.


Does everything have to be dumbed down for you?

> >  Lifetime received a barrage
> > of complaints about a so-called "anti-homosexual" video by some
> > Christian guy they happen to be unfamiliar with.
>

> And YOU would know that HOW if you are not bob larson?


BL's public announcement. How did that get past you?

> > While most of those
> > complaints came from people who never saw the video, the chose to
> > react on emotion and under the instruction of LGBT activists.  I can't
> > speak for BL
>

> Bullshit. You are bob larson, unless you lied twice.


Two links please...

> > > Distortions and lies noted. You give me too much credit, boobie. In
> > > this case the vid became viral by gay and atheist web sites and blogs,
> > > and I had nothing to do with it.

No one but you has the time, energy and interest to find a 14 year old
video and use it to stir up the alternative lifestyle community. As
the facts come forward, so to will the source.



>  BL has a history of making homophobic and anti- LGBT statements.
> Again you forgot the transsexual video you made and sold. And your
> radio show broadcast reaction to three "drag queens" Bobbie Bell
> invited as guests on your radio show.


But according to you, they're all actors. So if they're actors, there
is no homophobia.

> > BL isn't a
> > threat to the gay community and never has been.
>

>  Lie noted. The transexual vid showed Larson was in fact acting in a
> threatening manner to the female guest.


Keyword "acting"...



>This is on video, one you as
> bob larson recorded and sold to donors. It is proof against your
> claim. At one point the camera shows her shaking in fear.


According to you, she's an actress!



>You could
> add to your lie by claiming I uploaded the viral vid on my YouTube
> account, eduted the vid, etc.


Other than Woodsofodin, how many youtube accounts do you have?

[kensmithiscool]

On Nov 2, 2:46 am, K Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>      So you were LYING when you presented yourself as being Bob
> Larson?


When have I ever presented myself as BL? I've always said the
contrary, slowpoke. Since you appear to have all kinds of time on
your hands, look 'em up. They're not taken down :)



> Since you removed the video (unless you LIED when you presented
> you are Lar$on), they don't have an opportunity to see it.


I didn't remove any video, poopsie. But thank you for making a valid
point. Youtube does not allow hateful content on their site --
including homophobia. Therefore, if BL's video was anti-homosexual,
Youtube (not BL) would have removed it. Thank you Kent for admitting
that the video is not in any way intolerant to the homosexual
community.

[Jazzy Belle]

Actually Youtube DID remove the original video that was the source of
it becoming viral. Though it did show the asinine claim Larson has
that being non heterosexual is perverted and includes demons, it can
and was legitimately seen as being intolerant of homosexuality.

And Larson is a homophobe.

Moe

[kensmithiscool]

On Nov 7, 4:01 am, Jazzy Belle <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Nov 7, 3:34 am, K Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Tue, 6 Nov 2012 22:13:41 -0800 (PST), Jazzy Belle
>
> > <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > [Snip to focus on this one point]
>
> > >> >      Do you have a demon of homosexuality in addition to your demon of
> > >> > lying?
>
> > >> Given that you want to me to be BL, have you always been sexually
> > >> attracted to BL?  Is that what this long crusade of yours has been all
> > >> about?  Sorry, but BL is straight!  You can't have him...
>
> > >Kent never did have a "long crusade" on larson. I remember you tried
> > >that amusing little claim that I supposedly masturbate to your, I mean
> > >bob larson's photo.
>
> >      The truly important bit is that KSIC has once again claimed to be
> > Lar$on.
> >      I asked him if his use of a term of endearment with me means he
> > has a demon of homosexuality. KSIC is claiming I asked it of Lar$on.
> >      Either KSIC has once again admitted to being Lar$on, or he's
> > offered more proof that he has a demon of lying that is of utmost
> > importance to him.
>
> > --
> > I could write about noble gases, but there would be no reaction.
>
> Heh, I saw that too, Kent. KSIC isn't very bright, which may explain
> why he as bob larson is stuck on the fringes when if he actually was
> what he pretended to be in his cults books he might have saved enough
> credibility to be an honorary professor at some Christian university,
> college drop out though he is.
>
> Moe


Posting within minutes of Kent in the 3 and 4 o'clock hour of the
morning again?

[kensmithiscool]

On Nov 7, 12:13 am, Jazzy Belle <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> > Are you going to provide a MID/link to prove it?
>
> Are you getting senile boobie? Seems to me that like you pet greegor
> you demand answers to your questions but you ignore our questions to
> you.
>  Your hypocrisy noted.
>
> BTW PRESIDENT OBAMA IS RE-ELECTED PRESIDRNT OF THE UNITED STATES!!!

I can tell by the gross misspelling that you are indeed a braindead
Obamanati. Evil prevailed, and the Kool-aid won. Congrats. I'll
leave it to you to cheer a higher unemployment ratewe have today than
when Hussein took office 4 years ago. And I'll leave it to you to
cheer 14 million *more* Americans on food stamps since Hussein Soetoro
coasted into office. And I'll leave it to you to cheer higher food
prices, the cost of gasoline having doubled, and higher utility rates
the Obama economy has given America.



> The ruch haven't bought the presidency yet!


They left that to the dead vote and the corrupt, cheating democrats.



> > It would seem that it would take one to know one. . .
>
> Are you claiming then that Jesus Christ had demons? Or did you forget
> he saw Satan behind one of his Apostles?


It seems that it would be quite a compliment to BL that you see him as
Jesus Christ. But I doubt BL would embrace that. I never knew you
felt that way...



> > Your long, extensive posting history.  Did you know that according to
> > Google, you are not only this month's top poster at alt.fan.b-l, but
> > you are this ng's All Time Top Poster!  http://goo.gl/vNY7J
>
> You deliberately "forget" to mention that  Google counts every cross
> post as a seperate post.


No, that isn't true. If that was the case, Google would differentiate
that data and show it. Even if it was true, you still have to post to
cross-post. Therefore Kent is the Top All Time Poster of this NG.
Poopsie.




> >  I guess that happens when you are an unemployed felon...
>
> I guess you like risking your KSIC identity being legally identified
> to your real identiry in a legal action against you.


Only if you're saying Kent Wills is his real name. Are you outing
Kent? :)





> You can prove us wrong regarding your actual identity as bob larson,
> McExorcist. But then among your childish attempts at derision is
> cowardice, which interestingly are also bob larson traits.


But then among the childish attempts to lob phoney complaints under
various aliases to various entities tied to BL is cowardice, which
interestingly are also Maureen McAllister traits.

>
>
>
> > >      Do you have a demon of homosexuality in addition to your demon of
> > > lying?
>
> > Given that you want to me to be BL, have you always been sexually
> > attracted to BL?  Is that what this long crusade of yours has been all
> > about?  Sorry, but BL is straight!  You can't have him...
>
> Kent never did have a "long crusade" on larson.

15 years is a long time. Granted it's not 27 years, I admit, but
still...



> Really boobie. Do you actually have this delusion that you are a sex
> object? But then boobie, you DO have an interest in big dicks,
> particularly on "demins". I admit I was amused when larson claimed
> that all demons are male, when he "castrated" "demons" on one of his
> "conferences", and when larson showed an interest, even admiration, of
> a Satanist's drawings of demons with big penises.


BL can't be held to blame that it turned you on...




> And I REALLY like that audiotape you as larson made where you began by
> telling how when Elvis first came on TV, you said you focused on his
> crotch.


So now your desire is a threesome with BL and Elvis' pelvis? Well
now, I'd say that's too much info, Maureen!

[kensmithiscool]

On Nov 7, 2:16 pm, Jazzy Belle <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> > I can tell by the gross misspelling that you are indeed a braindead
> > Obamanati.  Evil prevailed, and the Kool-aid won.  Congrats.  I'll
> > leave it to you to cheer a higher unemployment ratewe have  today than
> > when Hussein took office 4 years ago.  And I'll leave it to you to
> > cheer 14 million *more* Americans on food stamps since Hussein Soetoro
> > coasted into office.  And I'll leave it to you to cheer higher food
> > prices, the cost of gasoline having doubled, and higher utility rates
> > the Obama economy has given America.
>

> Actually no. You ad homs and lies noted. The simple fact that in
> posting that post and this one BTW is that I am using a tablet I
> bought not so long ago and I'm still getting used to typing on a
> screen. Unfortunately Google groups is not working smoothly on this
> tablet's OS platform so some of my typos I don't see before I post.


Hmmm. I have no such problems with my tablets, and don't know anyone
with one who has complained of such issues.



> Your derision of the POTUS , calling him evil and so forth, really is
> not mature of you, old man. He is not to blame for unemployment,

Of course he is. . .



> higher prices and all the other things you in regurgitating FoxNews
> claims about him.


BSNBC/Huffington Post/Daily Kos sour grapes. Very typical...



>The hard fact is that he inherited the mess from
> Bush II


The hard fact is Barry took a $10 trillion deficit and added 6
trillion to it in 3.5 years. President Bush added 4.8 trillion in 8
years.




>and he had a lot of opposition from the GOP a-holes that in
> essence froze the govermnent out of petty spite.


Barry had a filibuster-proof super majority for two years. After the
people voted out the dems during the midterms and the GOP took control
of the House, the dems still had the edge. My poopsie, you give the
GOP too much credit!



>Gas, food and other
> prices have gone up since Reagan, boobie. That is a fact.

The rate of course under Obama has been devastatingly worse. The
price of gasoline in January of 2009 was $1.7/gal. Today, the average
price of gasoline in $3.6/gal. If you earn a paycheck, just wait
until January comes around to see what the spike in taxes do to what
little you already appear to make.



>You living
> in your Scottsdale mansion are hardly average Joe or Jane Citizen,

I do?!?!


>and
> don't pretend that you actually give a damn about the "middle class",
> which contrary to Romney's claim, never reached the income levdl of
> $250,000.


Don't pretend Obama knows your struggles. He's never known poverty.
When he was a community organizer in Chicago, he chose to live 90
minutes away in a plush Hyde Park apartment -- a long way from the
mean streets he "fought for."




> Bob Larson is an old man,


So is Frank. Your point?


> Lie noted. You might want to look at your own posting history under
> your various email accounts, boobie.


You both outrank me by a landslide.



> The reference was about you being outed, pardon your ironic use of the
> phrase used in the LGBT community. If you are as ksic legally
> identified as Bob Larson currently of Scottsdale Arizona, what you
> posted over the years becomes valid evidence against you in a court of
> law. All one needs is a competent lawyer, a few subpoenas and your
> various carriers reveal your true identity.


LOL! Let me see if I can get you started. How many hand-jobs do you
give Frank a day? Now, come at me. . .




> You accuse me of such things, which I find amusing because the simple
> boring fact is that I haven't done as you claim.  And if I am a coward
> as you claim, why isn't my IP masked and why is it that time and time
> again I use my real identity online?


Are you talking about here or the multiple locations that have
received "complaints" about BL?

[Greegor]

KSIC > Posting within minutes of Kent in the 3
KSIC > and 4 o'clock hour of the morning again?

Maureen > So what? Bring a stalker now ksickie?

Indicates how very OBSESSED you two are.
It may also indicate an intention to flood post or daisy chain.

So of course your response is to claim that
KSIC is a stalker for pointing out your posting times.

Standard Operating Procedure for you two freaks.

[Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.]

You're retarded, aren't you?

--
Sir Gregory

[kensmithiscool]

On Nov 8, 3:29 am, K Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Nov 2012 08:21:13 -0800 (PST), kensmithiscool

>
> <kensmithisco...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Nov 7, 12:13 am, Jazzy Belle <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >> > Are you going to provide a MID/link to prove it?
>
> >> Are you getting senile boobie? Seems to me that like you pet greegor
> >> you demand answers to your questions but you ignore our questions to
> >> you.
> >>  Your hypocrisy noted.
>
> >> BTW PRESIDENT OBAMA IS RE-ELECTED PRESIDRNT OF THE UNITED STATES!!!
>
> >I can tell by the gross misspelling that you are indeed a braindead
> >Obamanati.  Evil prevailed, and the Kool-aid won.  Congrats.  I'll
> >leave it to you to cheer a higher unemployment ratewe
>

>      If you're going to be reduced to spelling flames, you should make
> certain you've not made any yourself.


How can I be reduced to spelling flames when you're telling me I
haven't made spelling flames?

> >And I'll leave it to you to cheer higher food
> >prices, the cost of gasoline having doubled, and higher utility rates
> >the Obama economy has given America.
>

>     Lin and I will keep much of our money in off-shore tax shelters.


You have quite an imagination Kent. Still sticking to the imaginary
"Lin" story, Kent?

> >They left that to the dead vote and the corrupt, cheating democrats.
>

>      Please present your evidence that the Democrats won the election
> by cheating.


Sure. Obama For America operatives helped voters vote more than once
in more than one state. They helped voters cross state lines. See
the following article for one such account.. http://goo.gl/8mF0o


Also, Democrat Congressman Moran's son was recently caught on video
explaining to a "curious voter" how to forge utility bills in order to
vote. http://youtu.be/gT77qP2Nai8




>Bar your claim being more PROOF that your demon of lying
> is in control when you post, you'll be able to offer your evidence
> with ease.


Since your demon of lying forces you to pretend to be married with
children, and continue the lie that you're not a garage burglar felon,
I'd say you're the one in need of deliverance, Kenty...

[kensmithiscool]

On Nov 12, 3:29 am, K Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote:

> >> >I can tell by the gross misspelling that you are indeed a braindead
> >> >Obamanati.  Evil prevailed, and the Kool-aid won.  Congrats.  I'll
> >> >leave it to you to cheer a higher unemployment ratewe
>
> >>      If you're going to be reduced to spelling flames, you should make
> >> certain you've not made any yourself.
>
> >How can I be reduced to spelling flames when you're telling me I
> >haven't made spelling flames?
>

>      Learn to read, unless you're actually offering more PROOF that
> you have a demon of lying. Or perhaps you hold the delusion that
> "ratewe" is an actual word that is spelled correctly.



Or perhaps you're either too willfully stupid to see that I didn't put
a space between the words rate and we, or that you have reduced
yourself to not know the difference between a typo and a misspelling.

> >You have quite an imagination Kent.  Still sticking to the imaginary
> >"Lin" story, Kent?
>

>     Me and the numerous people who have commented about meeting her.



I'm not aware of the "numerous people" you're talking about, and quite
frankly, neither is anyone else here reading this. Therefore, we must
conclude that you are actually referring to your demons who have
apparently taken over your multiple sock accounts.

"Kent, I don't think that you're stupid but rather, a bald-faced
liar." -- Ken Smith, 4/22/96




>     I guess there's a massive conspiracy to trick you into believing
> she is real, or she is real and you are, for some reason, unable to
> accept it.


I'm not aware of any such people, Kent. I do know that this is one of
your typical, stock responses to address the question, and yet in
typical, mundane fashion, you fail to provide names or links to
support this bizarre myth of yours. And as such, you are a lonely,
pathological liar and have created your own fantasy world.




>  Nowhere in the article does it state the person voted twice, only
> that he told the person helping that he planned to do so.


Then explain there being more ballots than voters in several precincts
around the country.

> >Also, Democrat Congressman Moran's son was recently caught on video
> >explaining to a "curious voter" how to forge utility bills in order to
> >vote.  http://youtu.be/gT77qP2Nai8
>

>      Very interesting.
>      Has Moran been arrested yet? In the description it states he's
> being investigated, but has he yet been arrested? If he did as
> alleged, and the video is very damning, he should be facing charges.


Oh my. That is exactly what I have been saying with regard to the
baseless misinformation, disinformation and outright lies that have
been created by the BLFC about BL! Stick another quarter in your
ass, Kent; you just played yourself. LOL!


God Bless!

[deadrat]

On 11/12/12 10:04 PM, kensmithiscool wrote:
> On Nov 12, 3:29 am, K Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote:

<snip/>

>> Nowhere in the article does it state the person voted twice, only
>> that he told the person helping that he planned to do so.
>
>
> Then explain there being more ballots than voters in several precincts
> around the country.

That's easy. These precincts don't exists.

<snip/>

[kensmithiscool]

On Nov 13, 3:11 am, K Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote:

>      Word games will not erase that you were caught LYING about what I
> posted.



Which is why I don't entertain word games. Do you understand that
"rate" and "we" were unintentionally conjoined.



>      Above it is proved you LIED regarding my stating you didn't make
> a spelling flame. Being the simpleton you are, you left the evidence
> of this in the post.  Of course, if you had removed it, I would have
> simply replaced it, so your options weren't great.


In other words, you're penchant for lying knows no boundary...

> >I'm not aware of the "numerous people" you're talking about,
>

>      Liar.

>
> > and quite
> >frankly, neither is anyone else here reading this.
>

>      I await your evidence that you claim is true. If, as you are
> about to prove, your claim is a lie, you'll not be able to offer the
> evidence.



The mere absence of these "numerous people" coupled with you inability
to produce anything beyond you "because I say so" line of jive is
enough to persuade any rational person that "Lin" and "the children"
are a thoroughgoing myth. You make it too easy, Kent.

> >Therefore, we must
> >conclude that you are actually referring to your demons who have
> >apparently taken over your multiple sock accounts.
>

>      Projection noted.



Do you and Maureen use the same Book of Internet Comebacks, or do you
each have your own copy?

> >"Kent, I don't think that you're stupid but rather, a bald-faced
> >liar."    -- Ken Smith, 4/22/96
>

>      How desperate are you that you're forced to use a comment from
> over a decade ago?


I'm sure I could find something more recent, and probably could if
pressed to it...



> Why not use the any of the comments where Ken
> stated the opposite?


Because there are none...

> > I do know that this is one of
> >your typical, stock responses to address the question, and yet in
> >typical, mundane fashion, you fail to provide names or links to
> >support this bizarre myth of yours.
>

>      How conveniently you forget when Greg made a similar claim and I
> not only named names, but posted the MIDs for these claims.


Link please...




>      Oh wait, you didn't forget. Your demon of lying was again in
> control when you posted that.



Kent, Go make that drive to the nearest seminar for some one-on-one
intervention in order to get to the root of your issues!





>      If you would like, I'll post the MIDs again, adding more evidence
> that you love your demon of lying above all else.

>
> >And as such, you are a lonely,
> >pathological liar and have created your own fantasy world.
>

>      I await your evidence the proves your claim. If, as you are going
> to prove, it's another of your demon inspired lies, you'll not be able
> to prove the claim, since a lie can never be proved to be the truth.

>
>
>
> >> Nowhere in the article does it state the person voted twice, only
> >> that he told the person helping that he planned to do so.
>
> >Then explain there being more ballots than voters in several precincts
> >around the country.
>

>       I've seen no evidence of this. With you making the claim, it's
> wise to presume the claim is a lie.
>      But offer your evidence.



Apparently you don't read the newspaper. Let's start with Florida.
This Washington Times article could far better explain it than I ever
could.
http://goo.gl/v8V9t



>If these phantom precincts exist, you'll
> have no problem providing the evidence.


How can one provide evidence of something that is phantom? That may
just be about the stupidest thing I've read from you yet, Kent! :)




>If this is another example of
> your demon of lying being in control, you'll offer nothing, or you'll
> offer a cites that will be proved to be wrong.


Okay. How about Philadelphia? In 59 precincts, not one single vote
for Mitt Romney. Not one! What are the odds? Even you would have
to agree that it deserves examination.

[Greegor]

> > >You have quite an imagination Kent.  Still sticking to the imaginary
> > >"Lin" story, Kent?

> >     Me and the numerous people who have commented about meeting her.

> I'm not aware of the "numerous people" you're talking about, and quite
> frankly, neither is anyone else here reading this.  Therefore, we must
> conclude that you are actually referring to your demons who have
> apparently taken over your multiple sock accounts.

> "Kent, I don't think that you're stupid but rather, a bald-faced
> liar."    -- Ken Smith, 4/22/96

Ken Smith and KentMoe have been presented over and over
as being ALLIES in their obsessive hate campaign against BL.

But isn't it interesting that KentMoe keep referring to Ken Smith
over and over but Ken Smith actually called Kent a bald faced liar?

Could you imagine having Kent and Moe as allies in ANY cause?

Their transparent deceptions actually sabotage their own cause!

> >     I guess there's a massive conspiracy to trick you into believing
> > she is real, or she is real and you are, for some reason, unable to
> > accept it.

> I'm not aware of any such people, Kent.  I do know that this is one of
> your typical, stock responses to address the question, and yet in
> typical, mundane fashion, you fail to provide names or links to
> support this bizarre myth of yours.   And as such, you are a lonely,
> pathological liar and have created your own fantasy world.

Kent is such a "mythomaniac" that he thought he was
going to use anonymous posters to ""prove"" his lies.

Did Kent actually think nobody would see that coming?

I think Kent lives alone in that Rogers Arkansas shack except for
cats.

For awhile I thought that the fictions that Kent presents
were to puff up his ego or enhance his social standing.

But even teenagers online realized Kent's
story about being a school teacher was a fraud.

This is a good thing since Kent got an additional
charge for using a teenager as an accomplice
to his garage burglary felony.

Was Kent telling this "school teacher" fiction in the
hopes of finding another teenager dumb enough
to think Kent is in some way wholesome or honorable?

[Greegor]

On Nov 13, 10:08 am, kensmithiscool wrote to Kent:
KSIC > Do you and Maureen use the same Book of
KSIC > Internet Comebacks, or do you each have your own copy?

Kent's stock deceptions/logical fallacies (7/28/2010)

F. Ad Hominem calling opponents
1. Drunks or drunk drivers
2. Druggies or on drugs
3. Mentally Ill often as result of drug use
G. Res Judicata
1. Already conceded to Kent's argument
2. Question already asked and answered.
H. Fallacy of Suppressed Evidence
1a. Missing Middle, False Dilemma, False Dichotomy, bifurcation
1b. Fallacy of Complex Question - loaded question with presupposition
2. Withholding proof saying it's already on the table
3. ""Check is in the mail"" as proof of something.
4. Proof held hostage awaiting opponents proof on something else
5. Claim that a lack of proof disproves something.
6. Claim that a lack of proof proves something.
7. Claim that asking for a LINK PROVES insult XYZ
J. strawman
1. False pretense that opponent made some idiotic argument
2. Lie claimed to be based on opponents standards
K. OUTRIGHT LIE ( doesn't fit other designations )
L. IDENTITY
1. The court records were faked as a prank. ( On 3 official sites? )
2. Anonymity - That's not my name at all!
3. Doppelganger defense - " That was some OTHER Kent B Wills."
4. Never gone to prison ( convict didn't go either! mental case? )

It's as if Kent is an automation that is WAY too simple.

http://www.fallacyfiles.org/loadques.html

Since a question is not an argument, simply asking a loaded question
is not a fallacious argument. Rather, loaded questions are typically
used to trick someone into implying something they did not intend. For
instance, salespeople learn to ask such loaded questions as: "Will
that be cash or charge?" This question gives only two alternatives,
thus presuming that the potential buyer has already decided to make a
purchase, which is similar to the Black-or-White Fallacy. If the
potential buyer answers the question directly, he may suddenly find
himself an actual buyer.

[kensmithiscool]

On Nov 14, 5:51 am, K Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 08:08:24 -0800 (PST), kensmithiscool
>
> <kensmithisco...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The context your demon of lying fears has been replaced.


God would like your demons to be replaced with the love of of Jesus
Christ...

> >Which is why I don't entertain word games.
>

>      Yet above it is proved you do.
>      Odd that.


You've convinced your evil spirits of this. Why am I not surprised...

> > Do you understand that
> >"rate" and "we" were unintentionally conjoined.
>

>      This doesn't alter that your demon of lying made you post a claim
> that you knew was a lie.



Since it is impossible for me to have a demon and even more beyond the
bounds of possibility that you can diagnose someone with demons, your
unintentionally amusing attempt to finger-point as a means to deflect
attention from your longstanding bout with demons is properly noted.

> >In other words, you're penchant for lying knows no boundary...
>

>      You wrote, "How can I be reduced to spelling flames when you're

> telling me I haven't made spelling flames?"

>      As you have helped to prove, your position is one of a lie.



I'm not responsible for your delusions, Kent. And your delusions
won't help your situation to effectively play psychological games.

> >The mere absence of these "numerous people" coupled with you inability
> >to produce anything beyond you "because I say so" line of jive is
> >enough to persuade any rational person that "Lin" and "the children"
> >are a thoroughgoing myth.  You make it too easy, Kent.
>

>      You are the one who lied about "anyone else here reading this."



This is false, Kent. There isn't anyone here other than your
sockpuppets who can verify that you are married to a "Lin." This
goes without saying that it is impossible to produce offspring with an
imaginary woman.

> >> Projection noted.
>
> >Do you and Maureen use the same Book of Internet Comebacks, or do you
> >each have your own copy?
>

>      Avoidance of the truth noted.



Does conversation multi-tasking give you discomfort, Kent? I merely
pointed out that you and Maureen share the same, trite comebacks. I
suppose this is why Greggor refers to you two as KentMoe...

> >I'm sure I could find something more recent, and probably could if
> >pressed to it...
>

>      Please do so. Show a post from Ken wherein he make the same, or
> similar, claim about me since 2000.


Since 2000, eh? I wasn't aware that KS held his opinion of you as a
bald faced liar throughout the 90s.



>Nowhere in Google's Usenet
> archive, or any other Usenet archive, will you find such a post.


You sound awfully confident there, Kent. Did you delete those posts
too?

> Why not use the any of the comments where Ken
> stated the opposite?

Because they don't exist, Kent...

> >> How conveniently you forget when Greg made a similar claim and I
> >> not only named names, but posted the MIDs for these claims.
>
> >Link please...
>

> Message-ID:
> <fadb797b-8a6c-4a9a-a5c1-225bb6f7e...@u7g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>
>
>      That's my favorite. True, it's a post from you, but you quote one
> of the people who commented.
>      But wait, that's not all.



Not so fast there, Kent. If you're going to post a MID, at least
understand that it must be complete. You gave be a truncated MID,
Kent! :) Try again...



>
>    From February of 2008:
>
> Message-ID:
> <Iivpj.9215$Ej5.8...@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net> is a post where
> commentary is made about Lin's hair and a song The Princess was
> singing.
>      Admittedly, the post has no comment about Number One Son, but he
> was there as well. Flirting with the poster's daughters.
>
>      Here's one from someone else sent out in 2003.
>
> Message-ID: <3EA62BC3.C97F9...@suespammers.org>
>      Not3 his comment about how I married above my station. Something
> I've always said.
>
>      I can offer more, if you feel the NEED to have your lies exposed.


Again, you're going to have to understand how to share a MID if you
expect me or the audience to follow it. Hard to believe after several
decades on Usenet you somehow weren't knowledgeble enough in this
instance to know what you're doing. Hmmmmm....






> You're in a bit of a bind now.


Yeah you really got me there, Kent. Within your bluster to provide
MIDs from a decade ago as proof that Lin and the children are REALLY
REAL, you posted incomplete MIDs. Such a bind!



> Either Lin and the children are
> real, or there is a conspiracy to make people believe they are. Which
> do you think is the more plausible option?


If you can't provide proof from *this* decade of their existence,
then the plausible option can only be the latter, Kent.


Kent, you are very argumentative for a so-called Christian. Were you
asleep in the pew when they covered 2 Timothy 2:24 and Proverbs 20:3?

[kensmithiscool]

On Nov 14, 5:51 am, K Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >"Kent, I don't think that you're stupid but rather, a bald-faced
> >> >liar." -- Ken Smith, 4/22/96
>
> >> How desperate are you that you're forced to use a comment from
> >> over a decade ago?
>
> >I'm sure I could find something more recent, and probably could if
> >pressed to it...
>

>      Please do so. Show a post from Ken wherein he make the same, or
> similar, claim about me since 2000.

Apparently, KS's opinion of you continues to decline in 2012! It was
only last month when KS referred to you as "bat guano crazy" in an
indirect way. :)

http://goo.gl/Amw9y


He also went on to indirectly refer to you as a cultist by directly
labeling you a victim.
http://goo.gl/vwD23


You're welcome, Kent...

[Fred^44]

kensmithiscool <kensmit...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Nov 14, 5:51=A0am, K Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 08:08:24 -0800 (PST), kensmithiscool
>> <kensmithisco...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> The context your demon of lying fears has been replaced.
>God would like your demons to be replaced with the love of of Jesus Christ...

Have any evidence for this "god" thing of yours, cunt? Any at all?

[Jazzy Belle]

On Nov 14, 1:53 pm, kensmithiscool <kensmithisco...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Nov 14, 5:51 am, K Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 08:08:24 -0800 (PST), kensmithiscool
>
> > <kensmithisco...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > The context your demon of lying fears has been replaced.
>
> God would like your demons to be replaced with the love of of Jesus
> Christ...

You speak for G-d now boobie? With your very sinful history?

>
> > >Which is why I don't entertain word games.
>
> >      Yet above it is proved you do.
> >      Odd that.
>
> You've convinced your evil spirits of this.  Why am I not surprised...

Projection noted.

>
> > > Do you understand that
> > >"rate" and "we" were unintentionally conjoined.
>
> >      This doesn't alter that your demon of lying made you post a claim
> > that you knew was a lie.
>
> Since it is impossible for me to have a demon

Really? How is it "impossible"? Your idol bob larson himself says
Christians can have demons. Even in the Bible, Job, being the most
devoted to G-d, was allowed by G-d to be the chew toy of Satan,
supposedly to test his devotion to G-d. Even one of Jesus' Apostles
during the Last Supper was at the very least the sock puppet of Satan,
which Jesus recognized.

Why are you supposedly impervious? In Christian theology, anyone can
be demon possessed, saints, sinners, anyone. Any sin you have done or
was done to you or "inherited", according to your idol, is "legal
authority" for a demon to come in.

And you definitely are a sinner, boobie.

> and even more beyond the
> bounds of possibility that you can diagnose someone with demons,

As opposed to your college drop out, mail order diploma mill, unearned
priestly attire wearing idol? The same phony who "exorcised" Spiderman
from "Stanley", who couldn't "exorcise" Necrobutcher and who didn't
discern that "Shirley Ghostman" was doing an act. A guy who can't
"diagnose" a cold from a carouche.

> your
> unintentionally amusing attempt to finger-point as a means to deflect
> attention from your longstanding bout with demons is properly noted.

Lie and projection noted.

>
> > >In other words, you're penchant for lying knows no boundary...
>
> >      You wrote, "How can I be reduced to spelling flames when you're
> > telling me I haven't made spelling flames?"
> >      As you have helped to prove, your position is one of a lie.
>
> I'm not responsible for your delusions, Kent.  And your delusions
> won't help your situation to effectively play psychological games.

Irony noted. Considering what you've been trying to do to me for years
-- and failed time and time again-- you yourself play mental games,
hypocrite.

>
> > >The mere absence of these "numerous people" coupled with you inability
> > >to produce anything beyond you "because I say so" line of jive is
> > >enough to persuade any rational person that "Lin" and "the children"
> > >are a thoroughgoing myth.  You make it too easy, Kent.
>
> >      You are the one who lied about "anyone else here reading this."
>
> This is false, Kent.  There isn't anyone here other than your
> sockpuppets who can verify that you are married to a "Lin."   This
> goes without saying that it is impossible to produce offspring with an
> imaginary woman.

He has and she is real. Thank you for arguing against gaggie's
childish claim and agreeing with Kent about the existence of his
lovely wife and their munchkins. :-D

>
> > >> Projection noted.
>
> > >Do you and Maureen use the same Book of Internet Comebacks, or do you
> > >each have your own copy?
>
> >      Avoidance of the truth noted.
>
> Does conversation multi-tasking give you discomfort, Kent?  I merely
> pointed out that you and Maureen share the same, trite comebacks.  I
> suppose this is why Greggor refers to you two as KentMoe...

Not trite as you deceptively and dishonestly represent, as usual. Our
responses are calmly based and acknowledging that both you and your
shill gaggie are using tactics that both of us recognize as attempts
to push our buttons. It can become amusing at times when the motives
of you two are obvious. Even better when your retorts show more about
yourselves than about us.

The fact that Kent and I are both of above average IQ dealing with two
losers is just a touch of maple syrup on our delicious wafflez.

>
> > >I'm sure I could find something more recent, and probably could if
> > >pressed to it...
>
> >      Please do so. Show a post from Ken wherein he make the same, or
> > similar, claim about me since 2000.
>
> Since 2000, eh?  I wasn't aware that KS held his opinion of you as a
> bald faced liar throughout the 90s.
>

So where is your proof? And how ironic it is that you for so long have
dissed Ken Smith and yet NOW you cite Ken Smith as a source for your
childish lie about Kent.

> >Nowhere in Google's Usenet
> > archive, or any other Usenet archive, will you find such a post.
>
> You sound awfully confident there, Kent.  Did you delete those posts
> too?
>

He cannot delete posts sent by accounts he does not hold. Lie noted.

> >  Why not use the any of the comments where Ken
> >  stated the opposite?
>
> Because they don't exist, Kent...

As your claim does not exist, or you would gleefully show the links.

Doubke standard noted.

More like you can't access the MIDs. I have no such problem.

>
> > Either Lin and the children are
> > real, or there is a conspiracy to make people believe they are. Which
> > do you think is the more plausible option?
>
>  If you can't provide proof from *this* decade of their existence,
> then the plausible option can only be the latter, Kent.

That is a dumb claim boobie. The existence of his wife and children in
one decade does not suddenly make them cease to exist if he dors not
post about them where you can find it.

But it explains your approach in your reinventions of yourself, I mean
bob larson, where you, I mean bob larson, rewrite your past, omit your
many failures and uncovered sins, and don't mention to your followers
why you are so interested in their teenagers for you " freedom
fighters".

>
> Kent, you are very argumentative for a so-called Christian.  Were you
> asleep in the pew when they covered 2 Timothy 2:24 and Proverbs 20:3?

When was the last time YOU were held accountable, submitted to
legitimate authority or actually himbled yourself, facing your sins,
to Jesus Christ, boobie?

I can attest to your hypocrisy and how you yourself don t walk the
walk.

Moe

[linuxgal]

K Wills wrote:
>
> He no longer talks the talk. He proudly allows his demon of lying
> to talk for him. Then he gets upset when someone points out the proof
> of this. Proof he's offered himself.
>

It has to be a demon of lying, because people never lie. "The devil
made me do it."

</eyeroll>

--
Halftime at Circvs Maximvs, and the Lions lead the Christians 326-0

[kensmithiscool]

On Nov 15, 12:14 am, Jazzy Belle <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> > You've convinced your evil spirits of this. Why am I not surprised...
>
> Projection noted.

Where have I heard that one before. Oh! That's the same comeback
Kent Garage Burglar Wills uses. Are you his Siamese twin?

> Your idol bob larson himself says Christians can have demons.

Well don't stop there. What else did BL continue to say about it?

>Even in the Bible, Job, being the most
> devoted to G-d, was allowed by G-d to be the chew toy of Satan,
> supposedly to test his devotion to G-d. Even one of Jesus' Apostles
> during the Last Supper was at the very least the sock puppet of Satan,
> which Jesus recognized.

Maureen, I can see that you are no doubt in dire need of a good Bible
study. You sorely lack the knowledge to mention that Job's
protection was stripped from God; this would explain why Job and his
assets were opened up to Satan. Since God has not stripped me of
protection, I am personally not open to Satan. And with concern to
Judas -- I assume that is who you alluded to -- it was common
knowledge among the Gospel writers (that would be: Matthew, Mark, Luke
and John) that Judas as a betrayer -- as that is how they accurately
depicted him in the Bible. Judas never even received the body and
blood! His chosen destiny to eternal punishment is hardly open to
dispute. I could go on, but I have no further desire to take you to
Sunday school on this one. But I will say, you really need to get
yourself to a seminar for a one-on-one intervention. Don't have the
guts? BL does offer a Skype option. Which will you choose? Your
continued neglect to do either is why you remain so screwed up...

> Why are you supposedly impervious?

If you knew anything at all about being a warrior for Jesus and how to
declare your authority in Christ, you wouldn't ask such a short-
sighted question...

> As opposed to your college drop out, mail order diploma mill, unearned
> priestly attire wearing idol?

Oh my. If KS received royalties for every thought of his that you and
Kent continue to use, KS could have acquired the Sydney Harbour Region
by now. . .

> > your
> > unintentionally amusing attempt to finger-point as a means to deflect
> > attention from your longstanding bout with demons is properly noted.
>
> Lie and projection noted.

Another quote from the KentMoe Book of Internet Comebacks??

> Irony noted. Considering what you've been trying to do to me for
years
> -- and failed time and time again-- you yourself play mental games,
> hypocrite.

So will you be watching BL and the girls, as they will be featured on
the National Geographic Channel? That's Taboo: Devils and Demons...
set to air next Monday, November 19th. Be sure to check your local
listings for time.

> > goes without saying that it is impossible to produce offspring with an
> > imaginary woman.
>
> He has and she is real.

And yet you've never met Lin and the children. And you are the only
one who can step forward and back up Kent's imaginary wife and
children. And we know you are a chronic liar.

> Not trite as you deceptively and dishonestly represent, as usual. Our
> responses are calmly based and acknowledging that both you and your
> shill gaggie are using tactics that both of us recognize as attempts
> to push our buttons. It can become amusing at times when the motives
> of you two are obvious. Even better when your retorts show more about
> yourselves than about us.
>
> The fact that Kent and I are both of above average IQ

You two? I'd agree as long as you figured it in centigrade...

[Jazzy Belle]

On Nov 15, 12:53 pm, kensmithiscool <kensmithisco...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Nov 15, 12:14 am, Jazzy Belle <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > You've convinced your evil spirits of this.  Why am I not surprised...
>
> > Projection noted.
>
> Where have I heard that one before.  Oh!  That's the same comeback
> Kent Garage Burglar Wills uses.  Are you his Siamese twin?

The truth remains the truth no matter your childish ad homs. And the
truth about your idol bob larson cannot be covered up.

>
> >  Your idol bob larson himself says Christians can have demons.
>
> Well don't stop there. What else did BL continue to say about it?

Attempt to distract from your theological error noted. Post edit to
remove your claim about yourself ( "impossible"ksic has demons claim)
to cover your error noted.

In terms of "demons" I do not consider McExorcist bob larson to be an
authoritative source. Contrary to larson's grandiose claims abput
himself, objectively speaking larson is a has been whose "authority"
status on any subject one could name is more hot air and puffery and
no substance. I haven't seen a credible source cite him as an
authoritative reference in the last 15 years.

>
> >Even  in the Bible, Job, being the most
> > devoted to G-d, was allowed by G-d to be the chew toy of Satan,
> > supposedly to test his devotion to G-d. Even one of Jesus' Apostles
> > during the Last Supper was at the very least the sock puppet of Satan,
> > which Jesus recognized.
>
> Maureen, I can see that you are no doubt in dire need of a good Bible
> study.   You sorely lack the knowledge to mention that Job's
> protection was stripped from God; this would explain why Job and his
> assets were opened up to Satan.

Avoidance of the Last Supper reference noted. Absurd posturing of
college drop out noted.


.> Since God has not stripped me of
> protection,

REALLY? You, a mortal, are so certain G-d is "protecting" you?
Arrogance and grandiose posturing noted. Cult leader self delusion
noted. Delusions of being specially selected noted.

> I am personally not open to Satan.  And with concern to
> Judas -- I assume that is who you alluded to -- it was common
> knowledge among the Gospel writers (that would be: Matthew, Mark, Luke
> and John) that Judas as a betrayer -- as that is how they accurately
> depicted him in the Bible.  Judas never even received the body and
> blood!  His chosen destiny to eternal punishment is hardly open to
> dispute.   I could go on, but I have no further desire to take you to
> Sunday school on this one.  But I will say, you really need to get
> yourself to a seminar for a one-on-one intervention.  Don't have the
> guts?  BL does offer a Skype option.  Which will you choose?  Your
> continued neglect to do either is why you remain so screwed up...

Ad hom noted.
Obvious posturing noted. Attempt to bait noted.

You are OC free to email me for a skype meeting, though your track
history is one of cowardice and excuses. As to me "seeking out" bob
larson, note my comment above on his lack of credibility.

Besides, pretty soon Mc Exorcist might be better off traveling north
of his current mansion to deal with the spiritual activities regarding
Kachinas and the Hopi and Dine where if he really was about "spiritual
warfare" hr'd be on the scene of their ceremonies. But larson, coward
that he is, won't walk the walk he claims he does.

Or don't you know what I'm talking about, boobie? Right in your
"territory" therer are people of a race you are bigoted against, doing
for more than two months ceremonies and rituals whete some
participants become Kachinas-- and your idol bob larson ignores such
an obvious "demonic" ( to certain Christians, that is) activity.

>
> > Why are you supposedly impervious?
>
> If you knew anything at all about being a warrior for Jesus and how to
> declare your authority in Christ, you wouldn't ask such a short-
> sighted question...

"Warrior for Jesus"? You still selling that bs claim boobie?
Considering your "traveling evangelist" years and your later
hypocritical claim during the Clinton years that only Christians
should be in the military, you shouldn't even pretend you are NOW
some military "warrior"-- coward.

Larson had his draft catd in his wallet during his traveling
"evangelist" years and could have served in the military in a non
combat support role so that years later he would have some credibility
as a former serviceman-- but he didn't do that. As a Christian who
later claimed that only Christians be allowed to serve in the
military, his tour of duty would have given him credibility,. Instead,
his abscense of actual military experience makes his later posturings
and his claim he is now a "general" in the "spiritual warfare army"
look like the arrogant posturing bullshit it is, and an insult to
those who ACTUALLY SERVED IN THE MILITARY.

Ksic, you are a coward, not a "warrior". You insult the brave men and
women who served honorably on your sick fantasy thinking you are equal
to them.

>
> > As opposed to your college drop out, mail order diploma mill, unearned
> > priestly attire wearing idol?
>
> Oh my.  If KS received royalties for every thought of his that you and
> Kent continue to use, KS could have acquired the Sydney Harbour Region
> by now. . .

Ken didn't know about your idol's deceptive attire the exploiter has
been dishonestly wearing for over a year now.

Attempt to distract noted.

>
> > > your
> > > unintentionally amusing attempt to finger-point as a means to deflect
> > > attention from your longstanding bout with demons is properly noted.
>
> > Lie and projection noted.
>
> Another quote from the KentMoe Book of Internet Comebacks??

Ad hom noted. Irony noted.

Your inability to intelligently respond noted.

>
>  > Irony noted. Considering what you've been trying to do to me for
> years
>
> > -- and failed time and time again-- you yourself play mental games,
> > hypocrite.
>
> So will you be watching BL and the girls, as they will be featured on
> the National Geographic Channel?   That's Taboo: Devils and Demons...
> set to air next Monday, November 19th.  Be sure to check your local
> listings for time.

I feel sympathy for the TEs.


Moe

[Greegor]

On Nov 15, 3:43 pm, Jazzy Belle <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Nov 15, 12:53 pm, kensmithiscool <kensmithisco...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Nov 15, 12:14 am, Jazzy Belle <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > You've convinced your evil spirits of this.  Why am I not surprised...
>
> > > Projection noted.
>
> > Where have I heard that one before.  Oh!  That's the same comeback
> > Kent Garage Burglar Wills uses.  Are you his Siamese twin?

They are joined at the hip.

> The truth remains the truth no matter your childish ad homs. And the
> truth about your idol bob larson cannot be covered up.
>
>
>
> > >  Your idol bob larson himself says Christians can have demons.
>
> > Well don't stop there. What else did BL continue to say about it?
>
> Attempt to distract from your theological error noted. Post edit to
> remove your claim about yourself ( "impossible"ksic has demons claim)
> to cover your error noted.
>
> In terms of "demons" I do not consider McExorcist bob larson to be an
> authoritative source. Contrary to larson's grandiose claims abput
> himself, objectively speaking larson is a has been whose "authority"
> status on any subject one could name is more hot air and puffery and
> no substance. I haven't seen a credible source cite him as an
> authoritative reference in the last 15 years.
>
>
>
> > >Even  in the Bible, Job, being the most
> > > devoted to G-d, was allowed by G-d to be the chew toy of Satan,
> > > supposedly to test his devotion to G-d. Even one of Jesus' Apostles
> > > during the Last Supper was at the very least the sock puppet of Satan,
> > > which Jesus recognized.
>
> > Maureen, I can see that you are no doubt in dire need of a good Bible
> > study.   You sorely lack the knowledge to mention that Job's
> > protection was stripped from God; this would explain why Job and his
> > assets were opened up to Satan.
>
> Avoidance of the Last Supper reference noted. Absurd posturing of
> college drop out noted.

You sure are an officious twit aren't you?

You pretend you are some kind of authority
"noting" thins and that all you want, you twit.

> .> Since God has not stripped me of
>
> > protection,
>
> REALLY? You, a mortal, are so certain G-d is "protecting" you?
> Arrogance and grandiose posturing noted. Cult leader self delusion
> noted.

Moe > Delusions of being specially selected noted.

Make sure to write down copious notes in
your little notebook you officious twit.

Why are you SHOUTING about something you never did either?

It reminds me of when you pretended to be
speaking for native americans, Chief Runamok!

> Ksic, you are a coward, not a "warrior". You insult the brave men and
> women who served honorably on your sick fantasy thinking you are equal
> to them.

You're socially retarded so quit pretending you
speak for warriors or anybody else, you twit.

> > > As opposed to your college drop out, mail order diploma mill, unearned
> > > priestly attire wearing idol?
>
> > Oh my.  If KS received royalties for every thought of his that you and
> > Kent continue to use, KS could have acquired the Sydney Harbour Region
> > by now. . .

Moe > Ken didn't know about your idol's deceptive attire
Moe > the exploiter has been dishonestly wearing
Moe > for over a year now.
Moe >
Moe > Attempt to distract noted.

You make sure to scribble that down in your
little notebook you officious twit.

> > > > your
> > > > unintentionally amusing attempt to finger-point as a means to deflect
> > > > attention from your longstanding bout with demons is properly noted.
>
> > > Lie and projection noted.
>
> > Another quote from the KentMoe Book of Internet Comebacks??

Moe > Ad hom noted. Irony noted.
Moe > Your inability to intelligently respond noted.

Get over yourself!

> >  > Irony noted. Considering what you've been trying to do to me for
> > years
>
> > > -- and failed time and time again-- you yourself play mental games,
> > > hypocrite.
>
> > So will you be watching BL and the girls, as they will be featured on
> > the National Geographic Channel?   That's Taboo: Devils and Demons...
> > set to air next Monday, November 19th.  Be sure to check your local
> > listings for time.
>
> I feel sympathy for the TEs.
>
> Moe

TEs? Typo Experts?

Is this an example of your superior IQ, or was
this an example of how you are socially retarded?

> > > > goes without saying that it is impossible to produce offspring with an
> > > > imaginary woman.
>
> > > He has and she is real.
>
> > And yet you've never met Lin and the children.  And you are the only
> > one who can step forward and back up Kent's imaginary wife and
> > children.  And we know you are a chronic liar.
>
> > > Not trite as you deceptively and dishonestly represent, as usual. Our
> > > responses are calmly based and acknowledging that both you and your
> > > shill gaggie are using tactics that both of us recognize as attempts
> > > to push our buttons. It can become amusing at times when the motives
> > > of you two are obvious. Even better when your retorts show more about
> > > yourselves than about us.
>
> > > The fact that Kent and I are both of above average IQ
>
> > You two?  I'd agree as long as you figured it in centigrade...

Do you think neurotypical people go around touting their IQ, Maureen?

Do you think a neurotypical person would spend
TWENTY SEVEN YEARS obsessing about, stalking
and harassing one televangelist?

With no "smoking gun" damning evidence?

With THAT much effort to dig for dirt,
usually there is some damning evidence
that comes out, even if the person is saintly.

But YOU spent all of that time and
obsessive effort and got NOTHING!

27 YEARS obsessing and you've got bupkis!

Do you think a neurotypical person would do that, Maureen?

[Greegor]

On Nov 17, 1:21 pm, Jazzy Belle <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Moe > [...] that I would give any credibility to.

Did you think I was asking you to add credibility to
anything?

That's doubly idiotic.

You have no credibility to begin with, freak.

> Before you sneer at what you in your drug damaged mind as others
> faults, make sure your own life, such as it is, is without shame or
> our diseased excuses.

You're a freak, people reject you and you resent it. So?

Many Aspies resent "neurotypicals" for the same reasons.

When an innocent got falsely accused,
you thought you had playmates in the morass.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schadenfreude

You go beyond schadenfreude because of how
you resent others. You would even lament an
innocent falsely accused who eventually prevails
over false accusations.

You spent TWENTY SEVEN YEARS stalking
and harassing one televangelist and got nothing.
Do you think "neurotypicals" do that, Maureen?

You ordered a bootleg tape on eBay and when you
got exactly what you ordered you waited too long
for normal return policies, so then you pretended
that you didn't know it was a bootleg tape, and
cried about COPYRIGHT VIOLATION. Eventually
you did get your refund, but still you continued to
stalk and harass the eBay seller for a DECADE
online. Was that "neurotypical" of you, Maureen?

[K Wills]

On Sun, 18 Nov 2012 07:24:30 -0800 (PST), Greegor
<gree...@gmail.com> wrote:


Context restored at no additional cost.

Once again you PROVE you fear honesty.
Snipping is fine, but not when it is done to alter the context of
the post to which you are replying. I would be surprised if I alone
see you snipped to alter the context.

Group list restored.

Your admission that you lost, again, is accepted. When Dan
altered the group list, you claimed it was PROOF (emphasis yours) that
he was admitting defeat.

>On Nov 17, 1:21 pm, Jazzy Belle <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>

>>Gaggie, do tell how you abused a seven year old girl to "train" her so
>>you can get away with sexually molesting her.
>>
>>There is not a damn thing you can post, you misogynistic hoarding
>>loser, that I would give any credibility to.

>
>Did you think I was asking you to add credibility to
>anything?
>

You really can't understand written English very well.

>That's doubly idiotic.
>

At least you are able to admit the idea of you having any
credibility is doubly idiotic. Your work with your shrink is showing
some signs of improvement. Sadly, the rest of your post shows you have
a lot of work left to do.

>You have no credibility to begin with, freak.
>

Whereas the comment was in regards to your total lack of
credibility, your deception fails.
Of course, you've failed at each and every thing you've tried in
life, so this does not come as a surprise.

>> Before you sneer at what you in your drug damaged mind as others
>> faults, make sure your own life, such as it is, is without shame or
>> our diseased excuses.
>
>You're a freak, people reject you and you resent it. So?
>

Your projection is noted.

>Many Aspies resent "neurotypicals" for the same reasons.
>

That your Asperger's is part of the reason you were COMPELLED to
seek me out all over Usenet upon realizing I had left the CPS group
has long been accepted, Greg.
Your adding additional PROOF of your Asperger's really isn't
necessary.

>When an innocent got falsely accused,
>you thought you had playmates in the morass.
>

When did such a thing happen? Who is this innocent who was
falsely accused?
Are you claiming Lar$on was and is innocent? While he has always
managed to stay just this side of the law (a claim you can't honestly
make with your OWI conviction and your two convictions for BEATING
your ex-wife), no reasonable person would claim he's innocent.

>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schadenfreude
>
>You go beyond schadenfreude because of how
>you resent others. You would even lament an
>innocent falsely accused who eventually prevails
>over false accusations.
>

When has such a thing happened?

>You spent TWENTY SEVEN YEARS stalking
>and harassing one televangelist and got nothing.

Again, who is the mythical televangelist, Greg? I've asked you
this MANY times. You've never answered.

>Do you think "neurotypicals" do that, Maureen?
>

Do neurotypicals routinely invent a televangelist and claim, less
than a year after its invention, that someone has been stalking it for
27 years?
The answer is, of course, no. Which means you've once again
PROVED you are as mentally ill as you present yourself to be.

>You ordered a bootleg tape on eBay and when you
>got exactly what you ordered you waited too long
>for normal return policies,

So you LIED when you claimed she got a refund?

>so then you pretended
>that you didn't know it was a bootleg tape, and
>cried about COPYRIGHT VIOLATION.

Again I will ask, and again you will run away and HIDE, would you
be so kind as to offer evidence of your claim?

>Eventually
>you did get your refund, but still you continued to
>stalk and harass the eBay seller for a DECADE
>online. Was that "neurotypical" of you, Maureen?

Since she didn't stalk any such person, outside of the definition
you posted to allow you to claim people were stalking you, your lie
still fails. Just as it has failed each and every time you've
presented this same lie.

A select number of items that really are about Gregory Scott "Piggly
Wiggly" Hanson (They are so accurate, Greg compared them the comment
that water is wet):

Title: ST VS GREGORY HANSON
(DOB 05/22/1959)
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 04/10/1996
Comments: CT 1 OWI 1ST
OTHER CITATION 04/10/1996
Comments: CT 2 SPEED
Disposition Status
GUILTY PLEA/DEFAULT

"That's the chick, but not the pic, zipperhead!"
Greg "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson proving his bigotry towards Asians, by
attacking my first wife (deceased).
http://www.rsdb.org/search?q=zipperhead

Me: "I suspect your stalking is due to the use and abuse of illegal
drugs, Greg. Is the reason for your stalking the members of
alt.friends due to the use and abuse of illegal drugs?

Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson, wife beater and child abuser:
"Of course."

"My family's case is for Neglect, but we are treated
in virtually every regard as child abusers, marked on
the Child Abuse registry, for example."
-- Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson, wife beater and child
abuser

" ... But there ought to be conferences and studies on how to curb
minority overpopulation, repatriate minorities abroad, imprison more
minorities, increase use of the death penalty and divest minorities of
the power they have usurped over us in recent years. That would
address the most pressing problems of our day. ... "
April 2000, Gregory Hanson
http://www.nationalist.org/ATW/2000/040101.html#Hanson

Me: Your OBESESSION with a man named Frank is not healthy, Greg. Let
your shrink, no matter his/her actual title, know about this at your
next session.

Greg: He's YOUR Daddy!

Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson admitting, indirectly, that his
previous claim regarding who my dad is were lies in Message-ID:
<6e5bf51d-58de-4ef8-8580-c56d92e9e...@o8g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>

As of Sunday, June 06, 2012:
SMALL CLAIMS ORIGINAL NOTICE
Comments: OPA $2805.04
COPIES TO PA
VERIFICATION OF ACCOUNT
JUDGEMENT DEFAULT
Comments: JUDGMENT AGAINST GREGORY HANSON FOR $2805.04
+ INTEREST AT 7.271% FROM 8/6/98 & $45.00 COSTS.
Comments: NOTE OF GARN/NOTE TO DEFT SERV 9/24/98 BY WCSD
TO SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT (ED POLKERS) FOR GREG HANSON
FEES $35.60

Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson has a Garnishment order against
him. There is nothing to even suggest any of the money legally owed
has been paid. The SoL on the order has likely expired, but Greg still
can't risk getting a job due to it.

Me: Or are you claiming "The Letter Poster" is one of your MANY sock
puppets?

Greg: ding!

Gregory Scott Hanson openly admits that he uses sock puppets. You
may see my asking about his admission here:
http://snurl.com/greg_sock

[Jazzy Belle]

On Nov 18, 11:24 am, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Nov 17, 1:21 pm, Jazzy Belle <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Moe > [...]  that I would give any credibility to.
>
> Did you think I was asking you to add credibility to
> anything?
>
> That's doubly idiotic.
>
> You have no credibility to begin with, freak.

Speaking of credibility problems, gaggie, tell us how you were a
victim of a " witch hunt" when CPS rescued the seven year old girl
from the home of the womsn you mooched off of before you completed
your sick plan of training the child for your sexual molestation.

You are the last person to talk about lack of credibility, pissant.

>
> > Before you sneer at what you in your drug damaged mind as others
> > faults, make sure your own life, such as it is, is without shame or
> > our diseased excuses.
>
> You're a freak, people reject you and you resent it.   So?

What people are you referring to? Your imaginary ones?

>
> Many Aspies resent "neurotypicals" for the same reasons.

Projection noted.

>
> When an innocent got falsely accused,
> you thought you had playmates in the morass.

What are you talking about?

>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schadenfreude
>
> You go beyond schadenfreude because of how
> you resent others.   You would even lament an
> innocent falsely accused who eventually prevails
> over false accusations.

I ask again, what are you talking about?

If you are rehashing your "I'm a victim" act, i've read far too much
of the crap you posted over the years you've been doing your obsession
abour Kent and me to fall for your poor me act. Even youn words show
that others suffered because of you.

Hypocrisy noted.

>
> You spent TWENTY SEVEN YEARS stalking
> and harassing one televangelist and got nothing.
> Do you think "neurotypicals" do that, Maureen?
>
> You ordered a bootleg tape on eBay and when you
> got exactly what you ordered you waited too long
> for normal return policies, so then you pretended
> that you didn't know it was a bootleg tape, and
> cried about COPYRIGHT VIOLATION.   Eventually
> you did get your refund, but still you continued to
> stalk and harass the eBay seller for a DECADE
> online.  Was that "neurotypical" of you, Maureen?

Lies noted. Rehash of your many erroneous claims noted.

While you are wallowing in one of your Aspetgers traits, you, as
usual, forgot to mention that years ago when you verball puked up
your same tired accusations, I explained as simply as I could
( because you're an idiot) the facts behind your fallaceous
accusations. I see no trason to repeat them here because you can't
remember anything beyond whatever crap you've hoarded.

Did you finally clean up your pig sty apartment?

Moe

[Greegor]

On Nov 14, 6:24 am, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >You have quite an imagination Kent.  Still sticking to the imaginary
> > > >"Lin" story, Kent?

> > >     Me and the numerous people who have commented about meeting her.

> > I'm not aware of the "numerous people" you're talking about, and quite
> > frankly, neither is anyone else here reading this.  Therefore, we must
> > conclude that you are actually referring to your demons who have
> > apparently taken over your multiple sock accounts.
> > "Kent, I don't think that you're stupid but rather, a bald-faced
> > liar."    -- Ken Smith, 4/22/96

Do you deny that your allie Ken Smith said this about you, Kent?

Right, Kent?

[Greegor]

Why do you suppose that a guy like Kent who
got a misd for using a teenager as an accomplice
to a garage burglary would want to convince
young men on usenet that he is a school teacher?

Does Kent consider you to be part of his posse?

[Greegor]

Why do you suppose that a guy like Kent who
got a misd for using a teenager as an accomplice
to a garage burglary would want to convince
young men on usenet that he is a school teacher?

What motive would Kent have for pretending to
be a married school teacher?