> <dmca...@uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
> > Jason <Ja...@nospam.com> wrote:
> > >In article <k6a5c2$gr...@rumours.uwaterloo.ca>, "David Canzi"
> > ><dmca...@uwaterloo.ca> wrote:

> > >> Jason <Ja...@nospam.com> wrote:
> > >> >In article
> > >> ><0514afc1-b03d-4d5a-b520-523058e7a...@v9g2000pbi.googlegroups.com>, harry
> > >> >k <turn...@q.com> wrote:

> > >> >> On Oct 23, 6:16=A0pm, Ja...@nospam.com (Jason) wrote:
> > >> >> > In article <hlwdjsd2-30C185.13120423102...@news.giganews.com>, Jeanne

> > >> >> > Douglas <hlwdj...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
> > >> >> > > In article <k66s1c$t2...@dont-email.me>, sbalneav

> <sbaln...@alburg.net>

> > >> >> > > wrote:

> > >> >> > > > Jason <Ja...@nospam.com> wrote:

> > >> >> > > > > Has Cold Fusion been proved?

> > >> >> > > > > A man named Francesco Celani has proved with a simple
> > >experiment th=
> > >> >> at cold
> > >> >> > > > > fusion does happen. The new name for Cold Fusion is LENR (Low
> > >Energ=
> > >> >> y
> > >> >> > > > > Nuclear Reaction).

> > >> >> > > > > You can learn all about the simple experiment and all about
> > >LENR in=
> > >> >>  the
> > >> >> > > > > latest issue of Popular Science magazine.

> > >> >> > > > > The story begins on page 62 of the November 2012 issue of
> Popular
> > >> >> > Science.

> > >> >> > > > > Francesco Celani's simple experiment is discussed on page
> > >97-98 of =
> > >> >> the
> > >> >> > > > > above mentioned magazine.

> > >> >> > > > > You need to have access to a science lab to do the simple
> > >experimen=
> > >> >> t.

> > >> >> > > > I look forward to a peer-reviewed paper in Nature or the like.

> > >> >> > > Me, too. Cold fusion would open up all kinds of possibilities.

> > >> >> > Why not buy the November 2012 issue of Popular Science and read
> about the
> > >> >> > latest cold fussion experiments?

> > >> >> > If I lived near Austin, Texas--I would attend the cold fusion
> conference
> > >> >> > that will take place at the facilities owned by NI (National
> Instuments).

> > >> >> Do you _really_ think such a discovery would be published first in
> > >> >> Popular Science?

> > >> >> Gullible much are you?

> > >> >> Harry K

> > >> >There will be articles in those types of magazines once scientists are
> > >> >able to easily duplicate the LENR experiments and LENR devices.

> > >> >That is the reason the conference in the NI facility in Austin, Texas is
> > >> >important. Lots of scientists will be at that conference.

> > >> The conference was in early August.

> > >> So, was Francesco Celani's demonstration important?  National
> > >> Instruments doesn't seem to think so.

> > >> A Google search for Celani restricted to returning results only
> > >> from ni.com (National Instruments) gets only 3 hits.  all are 5
> > >> years old and for a different Celani: Paolo, not Francesco.

> > >The article about this subject was in the NOV 2012 issue of Popular
> > >Science. It clearly said on page 98 that it was an annual developer's
> > >conference. Did the article that you mentioned above say that it was a
> > >developer's conference or some other type of conference?

> > It was in the description of a youtube video: "August 7, 2012 -
> > Austin, Texas - National Instruments "NIWEEK 2012" - Francesco
> > Celani of the Italian National Institute of Nuclear Physics in
> > Frascati, Italy, shows me the Anomalous Heat Effect of what is
> > believed to be a Low Energy Nuclear Reaction (LENR). ..."

> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xe5rcEvsek0

> Thanks--that was the conference that was discussed in the Nov 2012 issue
> of Popular Science. The article must have been written prior to August 7,
> 2012 but was printed in the Nov 2102 issue.

> Do you believe it would be easy for a scientist to replicate Celani's
> experiment?