Message from discussion
Jason Accepts a "Discussion" in Place of Creationist Coward Andrew-a-Blank.
Received: by 10.180.95.227 with SMTP id dn3mr879923wib.1.1353058451446;
Fri, 16 Nov 2012 01:34:11 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Path: q13ni313014wii.0!nntp.google.com!feeder3.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!193.141.40.65.MISMATCH!npeer.de.kpn-eurorings.net!npeer-ng0.de.kpn-eurorings.net!border2.nntp.ams2.giganews.com!border4.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!novia!news-hub.siol.net!news1.t-com.hr!newsfeed.CARNet.hr!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: David Fritzinger <dfrit...@nospamtome.hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.atheism,talk.atheism,alt.talk.creationism
Subject: Re: Jason Accepts a "Discussion" in Place of Creationist Coward Andrew-a-Blank.
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 12:08:48 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 218
Message-ID: <dfritzin-3AC6D5.12084810112012@news.eternal-september.org>
References: <k69m60$ael$10@dont-email.me> <dfritzin-488624.08475106112012@news.eternal-september.org> <o4hqqs3o9av1.geq25orq3ael.dlg@40tude.net> <dfritzin-2158FD.14190606112012@news.eternal-september.org> <15hywt3nu2460$.efzoxmhb0b2s$.dlg@40tude.net> <dfritzin-34E570.14440006112012@news.eternal-september.org> <1v7ulatdov3wz$.v33zpka9981k$.dlg@40tude.net> <dfritzin-B430C0.07514907112012@news.eternal-september.org> <1qcaoaqxodqm3.1g31qn2ipeqf7$.dlg@40tude.net> <dfritzin-D40FA0.09320507112012@news.eternal-september.org> <12tdlf9l6xftq$.1c47dp9ltxy54$.dlg@40tude.net> <dfritzin-0DB026.08011608112012@news.eternal-september.org> <1h8yto6uvk2nz$.vgnm9bvzlh18.dlg@40tude.net> <dfritzin-CC52A4.06510909112012@news.eternal-september.org> <dv9n2rcefsc3.xww1l0e41y0m$.dlg@40tude.net> <dfritzin-1C29F0.07244710112012@news.eternal-september.org> <jsozqhpkgzh4.1g11nrzq2gcei$.dlg@40tude.net> <dfritzin-6FEF67.09163010112012@news.eternal-september.org> <qmj7bkvlouvt$.1vsbxavmy3fky.dlg@40tude.net>
Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="f6fdd20f4f991b76a5df01cb7fd58dd3";
logging-data="31200"; mail-complaints-to="ab...@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/pHHdWj2ZHos585Py+toHPmqc33Z1Eilk="
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.1 (Intel Mac OS X)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:qtcawc5ffENPdGCchEIfTN9FJ2o=
Bytes: 12745
In article <qmj7bkvlouvt$.1vsbxavmy3fky....@40tude.net>,
"Alex W." <ing...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Nov 2012 09:16:30 -0500, David Fritzinger wrote:
>
> > In article <jsozqhpkgzh4.1g11nrzq2gcei$....@40tude.net>,
> > "Alex W." <ing...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, 10 Nov 2012 07:24:47 -0500, David Fritzinger wrote:
> >>
> >>> In article <dv9n2rcefsc3.xww1l0e41y0m$....@40tude.net>,
> >>> "Alex W." <ing...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On Fri, 09 Nov 2012 06:51:09 -0500, David Fritzinger wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> In article <1h8yto6uvk2nz$.vgnm9bvzlh18....@40tude.net>,
> >>>>> "Alex W." <ing...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On Thu, 08 Nov 2012 08:01:16 -0500, David Fritzinger wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> In article <12tdlf9l6xftq$.1c47dp9ltxy54$....@40tude.net>,
> >>>>>>> "Alex W." <ing...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Wed, 07 Nov 2012 09:32:06 -0500, David Fritzinger wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> In article <1qcaoaqxodqm3.1g31qn2ipeqf7$....@40tude.net>,
> >>>>>>>>> "Alex W." <ing...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Anyway, who invented the Stiff Upper Lip, eh? We don't all sit
> >>>>>>>>>>>> on Oprah's couch to spread out our miserable dirty linen for all
> >>>>>>>>>>>> the world to gloat over. Nor do we ring up Dr Ruth when our
> >>>>>>>>>>>> marital performance stats go all British on us! Americans do
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Springer, we go to the pub and talk about the weather -- who do
> >>>>>>>>>>>> you think is healthier?
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Depends on how much beer you drink, and the quality of the beer.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Bah.
> >>>>>>>>>> You may drink more beer than we do (78 versus 74 litres per
> >>>>>>>>>> capita annually) but our beer is WAY, WAY, WAHAY batter than
> >>>>>>>>>> yours. Want proof? OK, one word: Budweiser. Not enough? One
> >>>>>>>>>> more word: Schlitz. Two more words: Michelob Ultra. Three more
> >>>>>>>>>> words: Pabst Blue Ribbon. It is scientifically impossible to
> >>>>>>>>>> chemically formulate let alone drink worse beer than these.
> >>>>>>>>>> Generously speaking, it is probably a superior taste experience
> >>>>>>>>>> to slug down a pint of warm syphilitic armadillo piss strained
> >>>>>>>>>> through a defensive lineup player's post-match socks.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> QED, cheers, down the hatch and up your bottoms!
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Hey, I'm not arguing about the quality of British vs mass market
> >>>>>>>>> American beer. The latter is horrible. However, the US does have
> >>>>>>>>> quite
> >>>>>>>>> a
> >>>>>>>>> number of microbreweries that make some very presentable beers.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> IIRC, Britain had the same problem a number of years ago. In fact,
> >>>>>>>>> I
> >>>>>>>>> was
> >>>>>>>>> living there during the CAMRA (Campaign for Real Ale) days.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> We have the same phenomenon: even though our pubs are dying off
> >>>>>>>> at an alarming rate, there are now twice as many breweries than
> >>>>>>>> twenty years ago. However, unless one knows where to go and what
> >>>>>>>> to order, the supply bottleneck remains. On top of that, we see
> >>>>>>>> the same sort of corporate takeover that bedevils boutique
> >>>>>>>> beermaking in the US: they wait until a small brewery has put in
> >>>>>>>> all the sweat and effort to create a decent beer and, more
> >>>>>>>> importantly for them, a generous dollop of credibility and
> >>>>>>>> reputation, and then they woop in to buy the place and turn it
> >>>>>>>> into a premium niche-appeal moneyspinner.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Sometimes capitalism is not very likeable...
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Actually, from what I have seen, there are more and more boutique
> >>>>>>> breweries in the US. From my time in Hawaii, I saw three or four
> >>>>>>> local
> >>>>>>> breweries, and there are multiple ones on the east coast. Just find
> >>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>> right liquor store, or the right bar (our word for pub), and you will
> >>>>>>> see multiple beers on tap.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> That's always the most interesting part, for me: some beers will
> >>>>>> be shite, some will be interesting experiments that may or may
> >>>>>> not come of, and some will be worth the trip all by themselves.
> >>>>>> It's boring to always see, hear, smoke, eat or drink the same,
> >>>>>> however delicious. Variety is the spice of life, and to see what
> >>>>>> an inspired young brewer can come up with is *interesting*.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Ditto winemakers...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I agree wholeheartedly. I don't drink as much beer as I used to, but do
> >>>>> enjoy wine, and like trying different wines when I have the chance.
> >>>>
> >>>> Drinking "much beer" is a young man's foolish game. When I hit
> >>>> 35 or thereabouts, I realised that quality matters more than
> >>>> quantity. Six ounces of three year old artisan cheddar are
> >>>> vastly preferable to a six-pound supermarket brich of generic
> >>>> "cheddar". Two pints of well-crafted real ale are rather tastier
> >>>> and far superior than two gallons of donkey piss. It's really
> >>>> why I stopped smoking cigarettes and switched to cigars: two
> >>>> packets of mass-produced drug are rather less worth the money
> >>>> than one handmade well-aged Cuban cigar.
> >>>
> >>> I agree with you on all but the cigar bit. I find tobacco to be
> >>> repellant to me. That it is most unhealthy only confirms my opinion.
> >>
> >> Everything is unhealthy in its own fashion and when consumed in
> >> excess or in the wrong way. For instance, I am very wary of
> >> organically grown vegetables because of the significantly higher
> >> risk of e.coli and salmonella (shit happens when you use organic
> >> fertiliser (1)). Also, I try to avoid the combination of alcohol
> >> and tobacco, since alcohol is as big a risk factor for heart
> >> disease and cancers as tobacco, and in combination acts as a
> >> catalyst raising the risk by orders of magnitude.
> >
> > You've got a point about organic food. However, one needs to balance the
> > damage done by pesticides, etc (and especially antibiotics fed to cattle
> > and pigs) with the possibility of infection from E. coli.
>
> I didn't say that I buy any old meat and veg off any old
> supermarket shelf. I do tak care what I buy, and if at all
> possible will buy directly from the farmer. There's one
> farmer-turned-butcher where I have been buying my Christmas geese
> (last year's was called Bertha, if you must know) for twenty
> years or so (plus all sorts of other meats): he only slaughters
> and sells animals from local farmers so he knows exactly what he
> gets: free-range grass-fed calves and lambs, for instance. Then
> there's the City investment banker-turned-pig farmer who
> specialises in slow-growth free-range rare breeds: his pigs take
> years rather than months to grow, but oh my, is that bacon ever
> worth the wait!
We don't really know any local farmers, and that sort of farmer is not
common in NJ, I am afraid.
>
>
> >>
> >> Certainly, my cigars have less of an impact on my lifestyle and
> >> mental faculties than many other pleasures. Smoking a stogie
> >> will not send me into a feeding frenzy as it would with a doobie,
> >> and it does not impair my ability to work, operate heavy
> >> machinery or complex gadgets like a telephone, or indeed perform
> >> in bed as alcohol might.
> >
> > I have to disagree with you on this. Nicotine is a very potent
> > carcinogen, and it is best avoided under all circumstances.
>
> Bad thinking, there: nicotine by itself is not a carcinogen --
> that's the job of the tar, polyaromatic hydrocarbons and all the
> other chemicals when combusted. If it were, the FDA would never
> have approved it for use in cessation aids.
>
My bad. However, smoking cigars gives you the whole cocktail. If you
don't inhale, you've still got to worry about throat or mouth cancer.
Besides, and this is a personal opinion, I find cigars to really smell
awful. Pipes less so.
>
> >>
> >>
> >>>>
> >>>> Wine is especially good in this regard, I find, because there is
> >>>> a whole lifestyle approach associated with it. Wine encourages
> >>>> moderation, enjoyment, conviviality. It complements all manner
> >>>> of other pastimes like music or good food. Not to mention that
> >>>> one tends to meet a rather better class of people on a wine tour
> >>>> than on a pub crawl....
> >>>
> >>> That is so, but boy, I had some good times on my various pub crawls when
> >>> I lived in England.
> >>
> >> So have I, but it does tend to be hard on liver, memory and your
> >> chances of chatting up local birds, don't you find?
> >
> > Of course. I don't recommend doing it all the time, or even somewhat
> > regularly. And, now that I am no longer the youngster I was when I lived
> > in Bristol, over drinking is probably best avoided.
>
> Unless you're knee-deep in your midlife crisis, in which case
> over-indulgence is probably unavoidable...
> :-)
>
>
> >>
> >> BTW, a fun pub crawl if and when you happen to find your good
> >> self back in Blighty is the Donnington Run. The Donnington
> >> Brewery is located in the Cotswolds -- quite possibly England's
> >> most picturesque part -- and is distributed in only 15 pubs. The
> >> challenge is to visit all 15 pubs in one day.
> >>
> >> http://donningtonbrewery.net/
> >>
> >> (1) pun intended.
> >
> > First, while I found the Cotwolds to be very picturesque, I preferred
> > the Lake District, which I found to be one of the prettiest places I
> > have seen anywhere. Regarding pub crawls, my best (worst?) was when
> > Courage had a thing going where you had to visit a certain number of
> > pubs in the Bristol area and drink a pint to get a book stamped. When
> > one got stamps from all the books, they got a Courage sweat shirt. I
> > believe a group of friends and I managed something like 7 or 8 in one
> > day. Wouldn't want to try more than that.
>
> Must have been in the days of yore when one had to do these
> things the hard way instead of ordering a sweatshirt off the
> interweb ...
> :-)
No, man, it was the sport of it, trying a whole group of pubs I never
would have gone to before.
>
> The Lake District is beautiful alright, but the villages (and
> hence the pubs) are too far apart for my taste. Some guide book
> even had the gall to suggest I *walk* through the landscape!
Perhaps so, but I found it to be far prettier than the Cotswolds, though
they were nice as well.