On Fri, 02 Nov 2012 02:54:12 -0700, r...@somis.org (•R.Measures) wrote:
>In article <hlwdjsd2-B8C8D8.19520301112...@news.giganews.com>, Jeanne
>Douglas <hlwdj...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:

>> In article
>> <6e8b70be-f4d2-4edf-85cc-e7b6130f6...@c17g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>,
>>  Seth lePod <v.inferna...@gmail.com> wrote:

>> > On Nov 1, 4:51 am, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>> > > On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 19:56:19 -0700 (PDT), Seth lePod
>> > > <v.inferna...@gmail.com>
>> > > wrote:

>> > > >On Oct 31, 4:51 am, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>> > > >> On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 19:42:01 -0700 (PDT), Seth lePod
>> > > >> <v.inferna...@gmail.com>
>> > > >> wrote:

>> > > >> >> Oh, yeah, and there's the "tell". Dukie has no legitimate
>answer, so
>> > > >> >> he
>> > > >> >> resorts to what he thinks is an insult.

>> > > >:
>> > > >> >Duke is constitutionally incapable of failing to have
>> > > >> >the last word.  Whether it's some other poster having
>> > > >> >sunk all his battleships, or whether (as happens
>> > > >> >equally often) he's backed himself into a corner
>> > > >> >unassisted, he's still compelled to bluster, bluff, try
>> > > >> >to divert, utter neck-snapping non-sequiturs, or hurl
>> > > >> >insults ("insults" often totally incomprehensible to
>> > > >> >anyone other than himself).  It can be cringe-inducing
>> > > >> >to watch.

>> > > >:
>> > > >> >Observe now, as he demonstrates my thesis for you:
>> > > >> I never lie on the ng, gumball.
>> > > >Et voila! As predictable as the anvil falling on Wile
>> > > >E. Coyote's head, Dook responded precisely as I
>> > > >predicted. As he must.  As he can no longer control
>> > > >doing.

>> > > With me, truth never stops.

>> > > >But which of my categories was this one? Let us see:
>> > > >1) bluster?

>> > > No

>> > > >2) bluff?

>> > > No.

>> > > >3) attempted diversion?

>> > > No.

>> > > >4) non-sequitur?

>> > > Hell no.

>> > > >5) incomprehensible apparent insult?

>> > > No.

>> > > >We have a winner, boys and girls!  It's clearly
>> > > >category 4, the bewildering non-sequitur:

>> > > Truth is always my last word.  That's why you have to back off and
>not me..

>> > > > I had said
>> > > >not one thing about Duke lying; that one came straight
>> > > >out of his own mouth.

>> > > Au contraire - truth is forever sustainable.

>> > > >Just as Jeanne said, a "tell". With a large dollop of
>> > > >guilty defensiveness on top.

>> > > From a dyke no less.

>> > > >(and of course, a desert of number 5 thrown in for
>> > > >free)

>> > > If you don't get truth, you have a real problem with reality.

>> > > >Seth

>> > > Heeheehee.  You see, that's the great thing about always being truthful
>> > > like I
>> > > am.

>> > Continuing our ongoing classifications of Dook's
>> > "responses", I count three blusters, four non-sequiturs
>> > and two attempted diversions in his most recent
>> > offering. Anyone else get different counts?

>> > And unless he can demonstrate that Jeanne is a "dyke",
>> > we can throw in one lie as well.

>>  And since I'm not, you can definitely include that lie.

>€€  Duke's wild and crazy assertions about other persons' sexuality
> gives cause to wonder about his reality.