Tebow Wants a Wife with a Servant’s Heart

[J]

One does not need to be a religious person to admire Tim Tebow's
old-fashioned values.








http://www.cwfa.org/content.asp?id=21628






Tim Tebow commented in Vogue magazine that he wants a wife with "a
servant's heart." Of course, he wants a beautiful woman, but he also has
high standards of character and integrity that are even more important.
The qualities of a Godly woman and good wife were modeled by his mother
and sisters, and Tim Tebow learned early on that Biblical principles are
the best foundation for a marriage relationship.









--
J Young
jdyo...@ymail.com

http://www.americandecency.org/

[Syd M.]

On Oct 27, 3:53 pm, J <jdyou...@ymail.com> wrote:
> One does not need to be a religious person to admire Tim Tebow's
> old-fashioned values.
>
>

So, the only wife for moral fascists like you are servants.
How nice.

[Jeanne Douglas]

In article <62e3k6....@news.alt.net>, J <jdyo...@ymail.com>
wrote:

> One does not need to be a religious person to admire Tim Tebow's
> old-fashioned values.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> http://www.cwfa.org/content.asp?id=21628
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Tim Tebow commented in Vogue magazine that he wants a wife with "a
> servant's heart." Of course, he wants a beautiful woman, but he also has
> high standards of character and integrity that are even more important.
> The qualities of a Godly woman and good wife were modeled by his mother
> and sisters, and Tim Tebow learned early on that Biblical principles are
> the best foundation for a marriage relationship.

And Tebow becomes even more disgusting.

--
JD

"Osama Bin Laden is dead and GM is alive."--VP Joseph Biden

[Mitchell Holman]

J <jdyo...@ymail.com> wrote in news:62e3k6....@news.alt.net:

>
> One does not need to be a religious person to admire Tim Tebow's
> old-fashioned values.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> http://www.cwfa.org/content.asp?id=21628
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Tim Tebow commented in Vogue magazine that he wants a wife with "a
> servant's heart." Of course, he wants a beautiful woman, but he also has
> high standards of character and integrity that are even more important.
> The qualities of a Godly woman and good wife were modeled by his mother
> and sisters, and Tim Tebow learned early on that Biblical principles are
> the best foundation for a marriage relationship.

If he wants a wife who will "graciuosly submit"
to him maybe he should start with a Filipino mail
order bride shop. Normal American women do not fit
that bill.

[John Locke]

On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 12:53:00 -0700, J <jdyo...@ymail.com> wrote:

>
>One does not need to be a religious person to admire Tim Tebow's

>old-fashioned values...
>
...oh, you mean his inane medieval fantasies about subservient women ?

[linuxgal]

Jesus told his followers to pray in private, Tebow does it on Monday
Night Football in front of millions.

--
Need a spiritual home? Consider joining us at Mary Queen of the Universe
Latter-day Buddhislamic Free Will Christian UFO Synagogue of Vishnu

[duke]

On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 14:59:03 -0700, Jeanne Douglas <hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com>
wrote:

>In article <62e3k6....@news.alt.net>, J <jdyo...@ymail.com>
>wrote:
>
>> One does not need to be a religious person to admire Tim Tebow's
>> old-fashioned values.

>> Tim Tebow commented in Vogue magazine that he wants a wife with "a
>> servant's heart." Of course, he wants a beautiful woman, but he also has
>> high standards of character and integrity that are even more important.
>> The qualities of a Godly woman and good wife were modeled by his mother
>> and sisters, and Tim Tebow learned early on that Biblical principles are
>> the best foundation for a marriage relationship.

>And Tebow becomes even more disgusting.

He wants a real marriage - where man and woman love one another en ought to
place the other's needs first rather than one's personal wants. That's
something you dykes don't understand.

The dukester, American - American
********************************************
A vote for obama is a vote for the end of
democracy in America as we know it. Let the
rolling thunder guide your decision at the
ballot box to put an end to Imperial Obama.
May God bless America.
********************************************

[duke]

You clearly don't now Jesus gave us a dual standard:
1. Men, love your wives (as Jewish women were chattel)
2. Women, be submissive to your husband. (he'll earn the bacon).

[Syd M.]

On Oct 28, 10:09 am, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 14:59:03 -0700, Jeanne Douglas <hlwdj...@NOSPAMgmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >In article <62e3k6.sik.1...@news.alt.net>, J <jdyou...@ymail.com>

> >wrote:
>
> >> One does not need to be a religious person to admire Tim Tebow's
> >> old-fashioned values.
> >> Tim Tebow commented in Vogue magazine that he wants a wife with "a
> >> servant's heart." Of course, he wants a beautiful woman, but he also has
> >> high standards of character and integrity that are even more important.
> >> The qualities of a Godly woman and good wife were modeled by his mother
> >> and sisters, and Tim Tebow learned early on that Biblical principles are
> >> the best foundation for a marriage relationship.
> >And Tebow becomes even more disgusting.
>
> He wants a real marriage -

No, he wants a slave.
That is NOT a 'real marriage', Dork.

[Syd M.]

On Oct 28, 10:15 am, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 17:24:32 -0500, Mitchell Holman <nomailverizon.net> wrote:

> >J <jdyou...@ymail.com> wrote innews:62e3k6....@news.alt.net:

>
> >> One does not need to be a religious person to admire Tim Tebow's
> >> old-fashioned values.
> >>http://www.cwfa.org/content.asp?id=21628
> >> Tim Tebow commented in Vogue magazine that he wants a wife with "a
> >> servant's heart." Of course, he wants a beautiful woman, but he also has
> >> high standards of character and integrity that are even more important.
> >> The qualities of a Godly woman and good wife were modeled by his mother
> >> and sisters, and Tim Tebow learned early on that Biblical principles are
> >> the best foundation for a marriage relationship.
> >     If he wants a wife who will "graciuosly submit"
> >to him maybe he should start with a Filipino mail
> >order bride shop. Normal American women do not fit
> >that bill.
>
> You clearly don't now Jesus gave us a dual standard:
> 1.  Men, love your wives (as Jewish women were chattel)
> 2.  Women, be submissive to your husband.  (he'll earn the bacon).
>

And that is why your religion is backwards, reactionary, and selfish.

[Syd M.]

On Oct 27, 10:52 pm, John Locke <johnnydemon...@demonmail.com> wrote:

> On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 12:53:00 -0700, J <jdyou...@ymail.com> wrote:
>
> >One does not need to be a religious person to admire Tim Tebow's
> >old-fashioned values...
>
> ...oh, you mean his inane medieval fantasies about subservient women ?

But it used to be love, honor and *obey* before they started changing
the sacred vows.

[Jeanne Douglas]

In article <r1fq88h3vm4t6ea3o...@4ax.com>,

duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:

> On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 14:59:03 -0700, Jeanne Douglas <hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >In article <62e3k6....@news.alt.net>, J <jdyo...@ymail.com>
> >wrote:
> >
> >> One does not need to be a religious person to admire Tim Tebow's
> >> old-fashioned values.
>
> >> Tim Tebow commented in Vogue magazine that he wants a wife with "a
> >> servant's heart." Of course, he wants a beautiful woman, but he also has
> >> high standards of character and integrity that are even more important.
> >> The qualities of a Godly woman and good wife were modeled by his mother
> >> and sisters, and Tim Tebow learned early on that Biblical principles are
> >> the best foundation for a marriage relationship.
>
> >And Tebow becomes even more disgusting.
>
> He wants a real marriage - where man and woman love one another en ought to
> place the other's needs first rather than one's personal wants. That's
> something you dykes don't understand.

He wants a servant, not a wife.

[Devils Advocaat]

On 28 Oct, 14:09, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 14:59:03 -0700, Jeanne Douglas <hlwdj...@NOSPAMgmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >In article <62e3k6.sik.1...@news.alt.net>, J <jdyou...@ymail.com>

> >wrote:
>
> >> One does not need to be a religious person to admire Tim Tebow's
> >> old-fashioned values.
> >> Tim Tebow commented in Vogue magazine that he wants a wife with "a
> >> servant's heart." Of course, he wants a beautiful woman, but he also has
> >> high standards of character and integrity that are even more important.
> >> The qualities of a Godly woman and good wife were modeled by his mother
> >> and sisters, and Tim Tebow learned early on that Biblical principles are
> >> the best foundation for a marriage relationship.
> >And Tebow becomes even more disgusting.
>
> He wants a real marriage - where man and woman love one another en ought to
> place the other's needs first rather than one's personal wants.    That's
> something you dykes don't understand.

Excuse me duckegg but that is not what Tebow wants, he wants a wife

with a servant's heart.

That means his wants come before her needs, and not what you claim.

[duke]

On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 16:04:48 -0700, linuxgal <linu...@cleanposts.com> wrote:

>John Locke wrote:
>> On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 12:53:00 -0700, J <jdyo...@ymail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> One does not need to be a religious person to admire Tim Tebow's
>>> old-fashioned values...
>>>
>> ...oh, you mean his inane medieval fantasies about subservient women ?
>>
>>
>
>Jesus told his followers to pray in private,

No, he didn't. He said his Father has no problem hearing you there.

[linuxgal]

duke wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 16:04:48 -0700, linuxgal <linu...@cleanposts.com> wrote:
>
>> John Locke wrote:
>>> On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 12:53:00 -0700, J <jdyo...@ymail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> One does not need to be a religious person to admire Tim Tebow's
>>>> old-fashioned values...
>>>>
>>> ...oh, you mean his inane medieval fantasies about subservient women ?
>>>
>>>
>> Jesus told his followers to pray in private,
>
> No, he didn't. He said his Father has no problem hearing you there.
>

Bible stories carry about as much weight as Bill Cosby's Chicken Heart
that Ate New York.

--
What a country! In America, you follow other Tweeters. In Soviet Russia,
Twitter follows YOU

[Father Haskell]

On Oct 27, 3:53 pm, J <jdyou...@ymail.com> wrote:

> One does not need to be a religious person to admire Tim Tebow's
> old-fashioned values.
>
> http://www.cwfa.org/content.asp?id=21628
>
> Tim Tebow commented in Vogue magazine that he wants a wife with "a
> servant's heart." Of course, he wants a beautiful woman, but he also has
> high standards of character and integrity that are even more important.
> The qualities of a Godly woman and good wife were modeled by his mother
> and sisters, and Tim Tebow learned early on that Biblical principles are
> the best foundation for a marriage relationship.

If only...

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0087010/

[Jeanne Douglas]

In article
<5106c7c4-6ac3-449d...@c20g2000vbz.googlegroups.com>,

Ahhh, the movie that proved that Farrah Fawcett could actually act.

[Syd M.]

On Oct 28, 3:13 pm, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:

> On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 16:04:48 -0700, linuxgal <linux...@cleanposts.com> wrote:
> >John Locke wrote:

> >> On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 12:53:00 -0700, J <jdyou...@ymail.com> wrote:
>
> >>> One does not need to be a religious person to admire Tim Tebow's
> >>> old-fashioned values...
>
> >> ...oh, you mean his inane medieval fantasies about subservient women ?
>
> >Jesus told his followers to pray in private,
>
> No, he didn't.

Yes, he did.
You are wrong, again.

[Lady Veteran]

On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 09:09:28 -0500, duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:

>On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 14:59:03 -0700, Jeanne Douglas <hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>In article <62e3k6....@news.alt.net>, J <jdyo...@ymail.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>> One does not need to be a religious person to admire Tim Tebow's
>>> old-fashioned values.
>
>>> Tim Tebow commented in Vogue magazine that he wants a wife with "a
>>> servant's heart." Of course, he wants a beautiful woman, but he also has
>>> high standards of character and integrity that are even more important.
>>> The qualities of a Godly woman and good wife were modeled by his mother
>>> and sisters, and Tim Tebow learned early on that Biblical principles are
>>> the best foundation for a marriage relationship.
>
>>And Tebow becomes even more disgusting.
>
>He wants a real marriage - where man and woman love one another en ought to
>place the other's needs first rather than one's personal wants. That's
>something you dykes don't understand.
>

Males who refer to strong women as lesbians can't get it up and always
blame her.

Classic male insecurity permeated biblical times as it does now.

I refuse to believe that Almighty God gave me intelligence and the
smarts to make it in this world and then says I cannot use it.

I submit to no one but God. No man on this earth is worthy of that
much respect.

LV

--

"I rode a tank and held a general's rank
When the blitzkrieg raged and the bodies stank."

---Sympathy for the Devil-The Rolling Stones
--------------------------------------------

"Only a male compensating for his impotence
would accuse a strong woman of being a lesbian."

---Unknown
----------------------------------------------

"It's a sign of your own worth sometimes if you are
hated by the right people."

---Miles Franklin
----------------------------------------------

See the latest idiot featured on my blog!

My Blog http://ladyveteranslog.blogspot.com
---------------------------------------------
"Do you have enemies? Good. That means that you have
stood up for something,sometime in your life."

---Winston Churchill
----------------------------------------------
Remember that today's oak tree is yesterday's nut that
stood it's ground.

---Unknown
----------------------------------------------
"Your time is limited, so don't waste it living
someone else's life."

---Steve Jobs
----------------------------------------------
Ten years ago the USA had Steve Jobs, Bob Hope and
Johnny Cash .... Now they have no Jobs, no Hope and
no Cash.

---Unknown
----------------------------------------------
"No Gentleman will insult me and no one not a gentleman
can insult me."

---Frederick Douglas

[duke]

On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 11:32:42 -0700, Jeanne Douglas <hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com>

wrote:

>In article <r1fq88h3vm4t6ea3o...@4ax.com>,
> duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 14:59:03 -0700, Jeanne Douglas <hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >In article <62e3k6....@news.alt.net>, J <jdyo...@ymail.com>
>> >wrote:
>> >
>> >> One does not need to be a religious person to admire Tim Tebow's
>> >> old-fashioned values.
>>
>> >> Tim Tebow commented in Vogue magazine that he wants a wife with "a
>> >> servant's heart." Of course, he wants a beautiful woman, but he also has
>> >> high standards of character and integrity that are even more important.
>> >> The qualities of a Godly woman and good wife were modeled by his mother
>> >> and sisters, and Tim Tebow learned early on that Biblical principles are
>> >> the best foundation for a marriage relationship.
>>
>> >And Tebow becomes even more disgusting.
>>
>> He wants a real marriage - where man and woman love one another en ought to
>> place the other's needs first rather than one's personal wants. That's
>> something you dykes don't understand.

>He wants a servant, not a wife.

He's earning the bacon while his wife scrubs the kitchen flood and makes babies.

[duke]

On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 11:37:25 -0700 (PDT), Devils Advocaat <manky...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>On 28 Oct, 14:09, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>> On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 14:59:03 -0700, Jeanne Douglas <hlwdj...@NOSPAMgmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >In article <62e3k6.sik.1...@news.alt.net>, J <jdyou...@ymail.com>
>> >wrote:
>>
>> >> One does not need to be a religious person to admire Tim Tebow's
>> >> old-fashioned values.
>> >> Tim Tebow commented in Vogue magazine that he wants a wife with "a
>> >> servant's heart." Of course, he wants a beautiful woman, but he also has
>> >> high standards of character and integrity that are even more important.
>> >> The qualities of a Godly woman and good wife were modeled by his mother
>> >> and sisters, and Tim Tebow learned early on that Biblical principles are
>> >> the best foundation for a marriage relationship.
>> >And Tebow becomes even more disgusting.
>>
>> He wants a real marriage - where man and woman love one another en ought to
>> place the other's needs first rather than one's personal wants.    That's
>> something you dykes don't understand.
>
>Excuse me duckegg but that is not what Tebow wants, he wants a wife
>with a servant's heart.

Only one can wear the pants. He wants a real woman for a wife, not a dyke.
Contrary to what you yourself might want, the huge majority of men do want a
family they are called to support and feed and be the man of the house for.

>That means his wants come before her needs, and not what you claim.

Wrong, you don't comprendo.

[duke]

On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 18:19:35 -0500, Lady Veteran <arm...@bigfoot.com> wrote:

>On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 09:09:28 -0500, duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 14:59:03 -0700, Jeanne Douglas <hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>In article <62e3k6....@news.alt.net>, J <jdyo...@ymail.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>> One does not need to be a religious person to admire Tim Tebow's
>>>> old-fashioned values.
>>
>>>> Tim Tebow commented in Vogue magazine that he wants a wife with "a
>>>> servant's heart." Of course, he wants a beautiful woman, but he also has
>>>> high standards of character and integrity that are even more important.
>>>> The qualities of a Godly woman and good wife were modeled by his mother
>>>> and sisters, and Tim Tebow learned early on that Biblical principles are
>>>> the best foundation for a marriage relationship.
>>
>>>And Tebow becomes even more disgusting.
>>
>>He wants a real marriage - where man and woman love one another en ought to
>>place the other's needs first rather than one's personal wants. That's
>>something you dykes don't understand.

>Males who refer to strong women as lesbians can't get it up and always
>blame her.

I'm sure most men would not be interested in a dyke.

>Classic male insecurity permeated biblical times as it does now.

>I refuse to believe that Almighty God gave me intelligence and the
>smarts to make it in this world and then says I cannot use it.

Then don't expect a man to open the door for you.

>I submit to no one but God. No man on this earth is worthy of that
>much respect.

And maybe a servant is proper for you.
>
>LV

[Lady Veteran]

I don't think you comprendo, dippy. A marriage is a partnership. There
are no his jobs versus her jobs. He has just as much responsibility to
change the baby as she does to take out the garbage.

Women working outside the home is normal these days and should have
happened long before now. If a woman stays home with the children it
is because they TALKED it over and agreed it was the right thing to
do. He is lucky that he makes enough money so that is not an issue so
he can be more picky and go find that "old fashioned woman. If he
finds a woman who wants to do that way, it is fine and there is
nothing wrong as long as they both agree.

[Lady Veteran]

On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 13:23:32 -0500, duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:

>On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 18:19:35 -0500, Lady Veteran <arm...@bigfoot.com> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 09:09:28 -0500, duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 14:59:03 -0700, Jeanne Douglas <hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>In article <62e3k6....@news.alt.net>, J <jdyo...@ymail.com>
>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> One does not need to be a religious person to admire Tim Tebow's
>>>>> old-fashioned values.
>>>
>>>>> Tim Tebow commented in Vogue magazine that he wants a wife with "a
>>>>> servant's heart." Of course, he wants a beautiful woman, but he also has
>>>>> high standards of character and integrity that are even more important.
>>>>> The qualities of a Godly woman and good wife were modeled by his mother
>>>>> and sisters, and Tim Tebow learned early on that Biblical principles are
>>>>> the best foundation for a marriage relationship.
>>>
>>>>And Tebow becomes even more disgusting.
>>>
>>>He wants a real marriage - where man and woman love one another en ought to
>>>place the other's needs first rather than one's personal wants. That's
>>>something you dykes don't understand.
>
>>Males who refer to strong women as lesbians can't get it up and always
>>blame her.
>
>I'm sure most men would not be interested in a dyke.

Well I know the dyke would not want them either. Backatcha, sissy boy.
You like it when your get it back?

>
>>Classic male insecurity permeated biblical times as it does now.
>
>>I refuse to believe that Almighty God gave me intelligence and the
>>smarts to make it in this world and then says I cannot use it.
>
>Then don't expect a man to open the door for you.

I don't and haven't since a very young age. Do they open the door for
you?

>
>>I submit to no one but God. No man on this earth is worthy of that
>>much respect.
>
>And maybe a servant is proper for you.

Do you have one for rent or are you volunteering?

[Alan Ferris]

On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 14:47:53 -0500, Lady Veteran <arm...@bigfoot.com> wrote:

>>Only one can wear the pants. He wants a real woman for a wife, not a dyke.
>>Contrary to what you yourself might want, the huge majority of men do want a
>>family they are called to support and feed and be the man of the house for.
>>
>>>That means his wants come before her needs, and not what you claim.
>>
>>Wrong, you don't comprendo.
>>
>I don't think you comprendo, dippy. A marriage is a partnership. There
>are no his jobs versus her jobs. He has just as much responsibility to
>change the baby as she does to take out the garbage.

Earl has never been married and his closest sexual experience with a girl is a
ladyboy in Thailand.

If you look at his picture you will understand why no woman would go near him:

----
Grotesquely Obese (Earl J Weber):
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1385182548

Earl's Obese boyfriend (P Barker):
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1339225483

St. Paul said that "their god is the belly " (Phil 3:19)
----

[Syd M.]

On Oct 29, 8:36 am, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 11:32:42 -0700, Jeanne Douglas <hlwdj...@NOSPAMgmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >In article <r1fq88h3vm4t6ea3obdsocvefmba8hl...@4ax.com>,

> > duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>
> >> On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 14:59:03 -0700, Jeanne Douglas <hlwdj...@NOSPAMgmail.com>
> >> wrote:
>
> >> >In article <62e3k6.sik.1...@news.alt.net>, J <jdyou...@ymail.com>

> >> >wrote:
>
> >> >> One does not need to be a religious person to admire Tim Tebow's
> >> >> old-fashioned values.
>
> >> >> Tim Tebow commented in Vogue magazine that he wants a wife with "a
> >> >> servant's heart." Of course, he wants a beautiful woman, but he also has
> >> >> high standards of character and integrity that are even more important.
> >> >> The qualities of a Godly woman and good wife were modeled by his mother
> >> >> and sisters, and Tim Tebow learned early on that Biblical principles are
> >> >> the best foundation for a marriage relationship.
>
> >> >And Tebow becomes even more disgusting.
>
> >> He wants a real marriage - where man and woman love one another en ought to
> >> place the other's needs first rather than one's personal wants.    That's
> >> something you dykes don't understand.
> >He wants a servant, not a wife.
>
> He's earning the bacon while his wife scrubs the kitchen flood and makes babies.
>
>

Thanks for the reveal, misogynist asshole.

[Syd M.]

On Oct 29, 2:22 pm, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 11:37:25 -0700 (PDT), Devils Advocaat <mankygo...@gmail.com>

> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >On 28 Oct, 14:09, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> >> On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 14:59:03 -0700, Jeanne Douglas <hlwdj...@NOSPAMgmail.com>
> >> wrote:
>
> >> >In article <62e3k6.sik.1...@news.alt.net>, J <jdyou...@ymail.com>
> >> >wrote:
>
> >> >> One does not need to be a religious person to admire Tim Tebow's
> >> >> old-fashioned values.
> >> >> Tim Tebow commented in Vogue magazine that he wants a wife with "a
> >> >> servant's heart." Of course, he wants a beautiful woman, but he also has
> >> >> high standards of character and integrity that are even more important.
> >> >> The qualities of a Godly woman and good wife were modeled by his mother
> >> >> and sisters, and Tim Tebow learned early on that Biblical principles are
> >> >> the best foundation for a marriage relationship.
> >> >And Tebow becomes even more disgusting.
>
> >> He wants a real marriage - where man and woman love one another en ought to
> >> place the other's needs first rather than one's personal wants. That's
> >> something you dykes don't understand.
>
> >Excuse me duckegg but that is not what Tebow wants, he wants a wife
> >with a servant's heart.
>
> Only one can wear the pants.  He wants a real woman for a wife, not a dyke.
>

He wants a servant, a slave.
Just like you, disgusting old man.

[Jeanne Douglas]

In article <p1us881nigg1io2mg...@4ax.com>,

Yep. Like I said, he wants a servant, not a wife.

[Mitchell Holman]

Jeanne Douglas <hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in
news:hlwdjsd2-A08F8A...@news.giganews.com:

Why do women flock to a religion that expects
them to "graciously submit" to their husbands?


http://www.thenation.com/article/162957/michele-bachmann-wife-chief#

[Jeanne Douglas]

In article <XnsA0FBB6152BB44...@216.196.121.131>,

Brainwashing.

[duke]

On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 14:58:26 -0700, Jeanne Douglas <hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com>

What he doesn't want is a bull dyke. A real man loves his wife, and mostly
wants to provide for her and care for her.

[duke]

You simply don't have the rest of the story.

[duke]

On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 17:16:48 -0700, Jeanne Douglas <hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com>

Love. you bull dyke.

[duke]

On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 14:47:53 -0500, Lady Veteran <arm...@bigfoot.com> wrote:

You got it, I see.

>>>That means his wants come before her needs, and not what you claim.
>>Wrong, you don't comprendo.

>I don't think you comprendo, dippy. A marriage is a partnership. There
>are no his jobs versus her jobs. He has just as much responsibility to
>change the baby as she does to take out the garbage.

Well, now you're starting to see what I'm getting at.

>Women working outside the home is normal these days and should have
>happened long before now. If a woman stays home with the children it
>is because they TALKED it over and agreed it was the right thing to
>do.

Fully agreed.

> He is lucky that he makes enough money so that is not an issue so
>he can be more picky and go find that "old fashioned woman. If he
>finds a woman who wants to do that way, it is fine and there is
>nothing wrong as long as they both agree.
>LV

Outstanding. A real team. And a LV understands that a team has one leader, not
individual leaders.

[duke]

We think a lot alike.

>>>Classic male insecurity permeated biblical times as it does now.
>>
>>>I refuse to believe that Almighty God gave me intelligence and the
>>>smarts to make it in this world and then says I cannot use it.
>>
>>Then don't expect a man to open the door for you.

>I don't and haven't since a very young age. Do they open the door for
>you?

Only a mere fraction of the times I opened the door for a woman. I like doing
it. Me man, take care of woman and children.

[Devils Advocaat]

On 29 Oct, 18:22, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 11:37:25 -0700 (PDT), Devils Advocaat <mankygo...@gmail.com>

> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >On 28 Oct, 14:09, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> >> On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 14:59:03 -0700, Jeanne Douglas <hlwdj...@NOSPAMgmail.com>
> >> wrote:
>
> >> >In article <62e3k6.sik.1...@news.alt.net>, J <jdyou...@ymail.com>
> >> >wrote:
>
> >> >> One does not need to be a religious person to admire Tim Tebow's
> >> >> old-fashioned values.
> >> >> Tim Tebow commented in Vogue magazine that he wants a wife with "a
> >> >> servant's heart." Of course, he wants a beautiful woman, but he also has
> >> >> high standards of character and integrity that are even more important.
> >> >> The qualities of a Godly woman and good wife were modeled by his mother
> >> >> and sisters, and Tim Tebow learned early on that Biblical principles are
> >> >> the best foundation for a marriage relationship.
> >> >And Tebow becomes even more disgusting.
>
> >> He wants a real marriage - where man and woman love one another en ought to
> >> place the other's needs first rather than one's personal wants. That's
> >> something you dykes don't understand.
>
> >Excuse me duckegg but that is not what Tebow wants, he wants a wife
> >with a servant's heart.
>
> Only one can wear the pants.  He wants a real woman for a wife, not a dyke.
> Contrary to what you yourself might want, the huge majority of men do want a
> family they are called to support and feed and be the man of the house for.

A real woman doesn't have a servant's heart duckegg.

In my relationships I have always treated the woman as an equal
partner.

And she has treated me the same way.

>
> >That means his wants come before her needs, and not what you claim.
>
> Wrong, you don't comprendo.

Poor little duckegg, I comprehend far more than you could imagine.

[Lady Veteran]

So why does she have to be a servant?

>
>>Women working outside the home is normal these days and should have
>>happened long before now. If a woman stays home with the children it
>>is because they TALKED it over and agreed it was the right thing to
>>do.
>
>Fully agreed.
>
>> He is lucky that he makes enough money so that is not an issue so
>>he can be more picky and go find that "old fashioned woman. If he
>>finds a woman who wants to do that way, it is fine and there is
>>nothing wrong as long as they both agree.
>>LV
>
>Outstanding. A real team. And a LV understands that a team has one leader, not
>individual leaders.
>

A penis does not imbue one with leadership qualities. Freud thought
that and after the Victorian era, he became a laughingstock.

[Lady Veteran]

YOu go Tarzan. Cheetah make monkey out of you.

[Lady Veteran]

On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 17:55:13 -0500, Mitchell Holman
<nomailverizon.net> wrote:

It is a rare religion that does not because almost all are
patriarchal. Most females tend to ignore it, which is a good thing.

[Lady Veteran]

You did it again, limp dick.

[Christopher A. Lee]

On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 15:52:07 -0700, John Locke
<johnnyd...@demonmail.com> wrote:

>On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 12:53:00 -0700, J <jdyo...@ymail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>One does not need to be a religious person to admire Tim Tebow's

>>old-fashioned values...
>>
>...oh, you mean his inane medieval fantasies about subservient women ?

Tebow is a stupid jerk, just like Reggie White.

Assholes like these turn me off American football.

If I watch a sport, a player's religion is irrelevent.

But these sociopaths use post-game interviews to evangelise, etc.

[Lady Veteran]

So you are saying that any woman who knows her own mind and wants more
out of life other then "kinder, kirche und kuche" (sorry-cannot do
umlauts), is a bull dyke?

How narrow can you get and still function? Surely you don't like
thinking like a Nazi.

[Tim]

"duke" wrote in message news:vbfq88ps561bm9ugl...@4ax.com...


You clearly don't now Jesus gave us a dual standard:
1. Men, love your wives (as Jewish women were chattel)
2. Women, be submissive to your husband. (he'll earn the bacon).


---------------

Trust you to bring up bacon, eh tubby.

[Brian E. Clark]

In article <vbfq88ps561bm9ugl...@4ax.com>,
duckg...@cox.net says...

> You clearly don't now Jesus gave us a dual standard:
> 1. Men, love your wives (as Jewish women were chattel)
> 2. Women, be submissive to your husband. (he'll earn the bacon).

I doubt very much that a rabbi would refer to bacon in such
a positive way. ;-)

--
-----------
Brian E. Clark

[Don Martin]

On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 09:53:01 -0500, Lady Veteran <arm...@bigfoot.com>
wrote:

>> Why do women flock to a religion that expects
>>them to "graciously submit" to their husbands?
>>
>>
>It is a rare religion that does not because almost all are
>patriarchal. Most females tend to ignore it, which is a good thing.

I have long suspected that the hyper-maleness of the OT sprang from a
reaction to the female fertility religions preceding it. In hunting
and gathering societies, the gatherers (women) produced most of the
calories while the hunters (men) most of the protein. Since protein
is an essential nutrient, this gave the men some claim to equality,
and such societies tend to be polytheistic, with gods of both sexes
overseeing various activities. With the rise of agriculture (very
likely the invention of women who had been handling seeds and roots
for millennia), hunting declined and the men became operatives within
that system, ploughing the land and weeding the crops, and the male
gods became less powerful. Consider the Greek pantheon, where the
real power was mostly wielded by goddesses, particularly those
associated with fertility, nurturing, and sex. For the most part, the
male Greek gods spent their time trying to get laid (often
unsuccessfully, as the girl was turned into a philodendron or
something by some goddess just at a very awkward moment) and generally
thinking with their putzes.

Warlike males, particularly pastoralists (an agriculturally-based
return to a monopoly on protein), seem to have a monopoly also on
inventing male monotheism, within which goddesses and the importance
of women. In the big three, women with the hearts of servants are the
ideal. Uppity women need not apply, and will be burned at the stake
if they do.

--

aa #2278 Never mind "proof." Where is your evidence?
BAAWA Chief Assistant to the Assistant Chief Heckler
Fidei defensor (Hon. Antipodean)
The Squeeky Wheel: http://home.comcast.net/~drdonmartin/

[Don Martin]

On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 09:56:54 -0500, Lady Veteran <arm...@bigfoot.com>
wrote:

>>What he doesn't want is a bull dyke. A real man loves his wife, and mostly
>>wants to provide for her and care for her.
>
>So you are saying that any woman who knows her own mind and wants more
>out of life other then "kinder, kirche und kuche" (sorry-cannot do
>umlauts), is a bull dyke?

It's Webber; of course that is what he is saying. Incidentally, the
umlaut is a replacement for an "e" trailing the marked vowel (just as
the circumflex in French indicates a former following "s:" hôtel was
originally hostel); you can write Kueche and be understood. All nouns
are capitalized, though, in German.

>How narrow can you get and still function? Surely you don't like
>thinking like a Nazi.

Don't like it? He _loves_ it.

[duke]

jd does that to men.

[duke]

Strawman. We're talking abut what a man wants, not bull dyke.

>How narrow can you get and still function? Surely you don't like
>thinking like a Nazi.

I'm a man, not a bull dyke.

[duke]

The statement is "servant's heart". Not a servant.

>>>Women working outside the home is normal these days and should have
>>>happened long before now. If a woman stays home with the children it
>>>is because they TALKED it over and agreed it was the right thing to
>>>do.

>>Fully agreed.

>>> He is lucky that he makes enough money so that is not an issue so
>>>he can be more picky and go find that "old fashioned woman. If he
>>>finds a woman who wants to do that way, it is fine and there is
>>>nothing wrong as long as they both agree.
>>>LV
>
>>Outstanding. A real team. And a LV understands that a team has one leader, not
>>individual leaders.

>A penis does not imbue one with leadership qualities. Freud thought
>that and after the Victorian era, he became a laughingstock.

Ah, I see. You believe each squad member should be his own leader.

[duke]

No, cheetah chasing bull dykes.

[duke]

On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 12:15:55 -0700, linuxgal <linu...@cleanposts.com> wrote:

>duke wrote:
>> On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 16:04:48 -0700, linuxgal <linu...@cleanposts.com> wrote:
>>
>>> John Locke wrote:

>>>> On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 12:53:00 -0700, J <jdyo...@ymail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> One does not need to be a religious person to admire Tim Tebow's

>>>>> old-fashioned values...
>>>>>
>>>> ...oh, you mean his inane medieval fantasies about subservient women ?
>>>>
>>>>

>>> Jesus told his followers to pray in private,
>>
>> No, he didn't. He said his Father has no problem hearing you there.

>Bible stories carry about as much weight as Bill Cosby's Chicken Heart
>that Ate New York.

I follow a higher moral code than you do.

[Mitchell Holman]

Lady Veteran <arm...@bigfoot.com> wrote in
news:ubqv88tb52o36k9dg...@4ax.com:

> On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 17:55:13 -0500, Mitchell Holman
> <nomailverizon.net> wrote:
>
>>Jeanne Douglas <hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in
>>news:hlwdjsd2-A08F8A...@news.giganews.com:
>>
>>> In article <p1us881nigg1io2mg...@4ax.com>,
>>> duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 11:32:42 -0700, Jeanne Douglas
>>>> <hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >In article <r1fq88h3vm4t6ea3o...@4ax.com>,
>>>> > duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >> On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 14:59:03 -0700, Jeanne Douglas
>>>> >> <hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com>
>>>> >> wrote:
>>>> >>

>>>> >> >In article <62e3k6....@news.alt.net>, J <jdyoung1

Actually it is a bad thing. Religious women
shouldn't ignore what they are being told by
preachers and rabbis, they could confront them.
That they meekly go along with orders to remain
submissive to men says as much about them as it
does the religion.







[Levi. 15:19] When a woman has a discharge of blood
which in her regular discharge from her body, she
shall be apart seven days. And WHOSOEVER TOUCHES
HER SHALL BE UNCLEAN until the evening. And every
thing that she lies upon in her SEPARATION shall be
unclean. Every thing also that SHE SITS UPON SHALL
BE UNCLEAN. And whosoever touches her bed shall wash
his clothes and bathe himself in water, and be unclean
until the evening. And whosoever touches anything THAT
SHE SAT UPON SHALL WASH HIS CLOTHES, and bathe himself
in water, and be unclean until the evening.

And if it be on her bed, or any thing whereon she sits
when he touches it: he SHALL B UNCLEAN UNTIL THE EVENING.
And if any man lie with her at all, and her flowers be
upon him: he shall be unclean seven days, and all the
bed WHEREON SHE LIES SHALL BE UNCLEAN.

But if she be cleansed of her issue, then she shall number
to herself seven days, and after that she shall be clean.
And on the eighth day she shall take unto her two turtles
or two young pigeons, and bring them unto the priest to
the door of the meeting tent.

[Lady Veteran]

If one has a servant's heart, you usually have a servant to go with
it. One without the other is useless.

>
>>>>Women working outside the home is normal these days and should have
>>>>happened long before now. If a woman stays home with the children it
>>>>is because they TALKED it over and agreed it was the right thing to
>>>>do.
>
>>>Fully agreed.
>
>>>> He is lucky that he makes enough money so that is not an issue so
>>>>he can be more picky and go find that "old fashioned woman. If he
>>>>finds a woman who wants to do that way, it is fine and there is
>>>>nothing wrong as long as they both agree.
>>>>LV
>>
>>>Outstanding. A real team. And a LV understands that a team has one leader, not
>>>individual leaders.
>
>>A penis does not imbue one with leadership qualities. Freud thought
>>that and after the Victorian era, he became a laughingstock.
>
>Ah, I see. You believe each squad member should be his own leader.

I believe that since this is not combat, there should be agreement
among the team members.
>
If your wife likes you with that attitude, fine. She may be the only
one who does.

[Lady Veteran]

Explain to your wife why talk so much about bull dykes. Are you
transgender?

[Lady Veteran]

Lawyers take the starch out of anything they touch. Is that why you
have such an attitude?

[Lady Veteran]

Attacking women who don't agree with you is a limp dick behavior.

>
>>How narrow can you get and still function? Surely you don't like
>>thinking like a Nazi.
>
>I'm a man, not a bull dyke.

In your mind, is there a difference?

[Lady Veteran]

Could be turkey bacon...

[Jeanne Douglas]

In article <vqhv889c5s4t7sl16...@4ax.com>,

Being a slave is NOT love.

Oh, yeah, and there's the "tell". Dukie has no legitimate answer, so he
resorts to what he thinks is an insult.

Why do you think calling someone gay is an insult?

--
JD

"Osama Bin Laden is dead and GM is alive."--VP Joseph Biden

[Jeanne Douglas]

In article <rnhv88tjllmd0tqc1...@4ax.com>,
duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:

> What he doesn't want is a bull dyke.

Of course not. A man wants a straight woman. Duh!!!!!

> A real man loves his wife, and mostly
> wants to provide for her and care for her.

A real man wants a partner, not a slave.

[Jeanne Douglas]

In article <krg098tsd9s9b915r...@4ax.com>,

Lady Veteran <arm...@bigfoot.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 11:26:53 -0400, Brian E. Clark
> <brian...@newsgroup.reply.only> wrote:
>
> >In article <vbfq88ps561bm9ugl...@4ax.com>,
> >duckg...@cox.net says...
> >
> >> You clearly don't now Jesus gave us a dual standard:
> >> 1. Men, love your wives (as Jewish women were chattel)
> >> 2. Women, be submissive to your husband. (he'll earn the bacon).
> >
> >I doubt very much that a rabbi would refer to bacon in such
> >a positive way. ;-)
>
> Could be turkey bacon...

Which, of course, is NOT bacon. Yes, it tastes good, but it's in no way
bacon.

[Brian E. Clark]

In article <krg098tsd9s9b915r...@4ax.com>,
arm...@bigfoot.com says...

> >I doubt very much that a rabbi would refer to bacon in such
> >a positive way. ;-)
>
> Could be turkey bacon...

A first-century rabbi living in the Levant would know
nothing of turkeys. :)

Besides...turkey bacon is to bacon what grape Kool-Aid is
to grapes: It tastes okay on its own merits, but it's
really nothing like the original.

[Father Haskell]

On Oct 30, 8:54 pm, Brian E. Clark <brianecl...@newsgroup.reply.only>
wrote:
> In article <krg098tsd9s9b915re3cch87r81ejte...@4ax.com>,
> army...@bigfoot.com says...

>
> > >I doubt very much that a rabbi would refer to bacon in such
> > >a positive way. ;-)
>
> > Could be turkey bacon...
>
> A first-century rabbi living in the Levant would know
> nothing of turkeys. :)
>
> Besides...turkey bacon is to bacon what grape Kool-Aid is
> to grapes: It tastes okay on its own merits, but it's
> really nothing like the original.

Bacon-flavored bits are a popular item in jewish
groceries. Basically, soy nuggets with a dash of
artificial bacony flavor and bacony color. Apparently,
while orthodox jews can't eat pork, it's perfectly okay
to lust over it.

[Jeanne Douglas]

In article <MPG.2afa4129f...@news.eternal-september.org>,

Brian E. Clark <brian...@newsgroup.reply.only> wrote:

Beautifully put!

[Father Haskell]

On Oct 30, 3:28 pm, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:

> On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 12:15:55 -0700, linuxgal <linux...@cleanposts.com> wrote:
> >duke wrote:

> >> On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 16:04:48 -0700, linuxgal <linux...@cleanposts.com> wrote:
>
> >>> John Locke wrote:

> >>>> On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 12:53:00 -0700, J <jdyou...@ymail.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>> One does not need to be a religious person to admire Tim Tebow's
> >>>>> old-fashioned values...
>
> >>>> ...oh, you mean his inane medieval fantasies about subservient women ?
>
> >>> Jesus told his followers to pray in private,
>
> >> No, he didn't.  He said his Father has no problem hearing you there.
> >Bible stories carry about as much weight as Bill Cosby's Chicken Heart
> >that Ate New York.
>
> I follow a higher moral code than you do.

I'd rather hear a 40-year old Bill Cosby routine.

[linuxgal]

duke wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 12:15:55 -0700, linuxgal <linu...@cleanposts.com> wrote:
>
>> Bible stories carry about as much weight as Bill Cosby's Chicken Heart
>> that Ate New York.
>
> I follow a higher moral code than you do.

Sure, higher moral code, the one that says if you rape a man's daughter,
you just give him some money and you're good to go. If you beat a slave
and he lives for a day or two, it's okay, because he's your property,
just like a junk car. If your kid sasses you back, you can have them
put to death. If you're a witch, you die. That code.

--
What a country! In America, you follow other Tweeters. In Soviet Russia,
Twitter follows YOU

[Seth lePod]

On Oct 29, 11:22 am, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 11:37:25 -0700 (PDT), Devils Advocaat <mankygo...@gmail.com>

> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >On 28 Oct, 14:09, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> >> On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 14:59:03 -0700, Jeanne Douglas <hlwdj...@NOSPAMgmail.com>
> >> wrote:
>

> >> >In article <62e3k6.sik.1...@news.alt.net>, J <jdyou...@ymail.com>

> >> >wrote:
>
> >> >> One does not need to be a religious person to admire Tim Tebow's

> >> >> old-fashioned values.
> >> >> Tim Tebow commented in Vogue magazine that he wants a wife with "a
> >> >> servant's heart." Of course, he wants a beautiful woman, but he also has
> >> >> high standards of character and integrity that are even more important.
> >> >> The qualities of a Godly woman and good wife were modeled by his mother
> >> >> and sisters, and Tim Tebow learned early on that Biblical principles are
> >> >> the best foundation for a marriage relationship.
> >> >And Tebow becomes even more disgusting.
>
> >> He wants a real marriage - where man and woman love one another en ought to
> >> place the other's needs first rather than one's personal wants. That's
> >> something you dykes don't understand.
>

> >Excuse me duckegg but that is not what Tebow wants, he wants a wife

> >with a servant's heart.

:

> Only one can wear the pants.

Wrong. Every relationship I've been in, we worked out
the important things mutually.

Smaller stuff, like where to eat tonight or who wants
to be tied up, got resolved in favor of who wanted it
more at the time.

:

> Contrary to what you yourself might want, the huge majority of men do want a
> family they are called to support and feed and be the man of the house for.

Yeah?

So, how's that working out for you, Duke?


Seth

[Seth lePod]

On Oct 29, 5:36 am, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 11:32:42 -0700, Jeanne Douglas <hlwdj...@NOSPAMgmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >In article <r1fq88h3vm4t6ea3obdsocvefmba8hl...@4ax.com>,

> > duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>
> >> On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 14:59:03 -0700, Jeanne Douglas <hlwdj...@NOSPAMgmail.com>
> >> wrote:
>
> >> >In article <62e3k6.sik.1...@news.alt.net>, J <jdyou...@ymail.com>
> >> >wrote:
>
> >> >> One does not need to be a religious person to admire Tim Tebow's
> >> >> old-fashioned values.
>
> >> >> Tim Tebow commented in Vogue magazine that he wants a wife with "a
> >> >> servant's heart." Of course, he wants a beautiful woman, but he also has
> >> >> high standards of character and integrity that are even more important.
> >> >> The qualities of a Godly woman and good wife were modeled by his mother
> >> >> and sisters, and Tim Tebow learned early on that Biblical principles are
> >> >> the best foundation for a marriage relationship.
>
> >> >And Tebow becomes even more disgusting.
>
> >> He wants a real marriage - where man and woman love one another en ought to
> >> place the other's needs first rather than one's personal wants.    That's
> >> something you dykes don't understand.

:

> >He wants a servant, not a wife.

:
> He's earning the bacon while his wife scrubs the kitchen flood and makes babies.

Hmmm...lesee here...thinking back over the women in my
life, we've got one with a Masters in Speech Therapy,
another with a Masters in Neurobiology, a third who
woked with monoclonal antibodies, and a fourth who
operated one of the top-ranked astronomical telescopes
in the world.


If I want a clean floor and no conversation, I'll get a
Roomba.

I prefer my women bright, very bright, and not afraid
to use it.




Seth

[Seth lePod]

On Oct 30, 12:27 pm, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 09:51:27 -0500, Lady Veteran <army...@bigfoot.com> wrote:
> >On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 07:35:00 -0500, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>
> >>On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 14:50:43 -0500, Lady Veteran <army...@bigfoot.com> wrote:
>
> >>>On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 13:23:32 -0500, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>
> >>>>On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 18:19:35 -0500, Lady Veteran <army...@bigfoot.com> wrote:

>
> >>>>>On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 09:09:28 -0500, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 14:59:03 -0700, Jeanne Douglas <hlwdj...@NOSPAMgmail.com>
> >>>>>>wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>In article <62e3k6.sik.1...@news.alt.net>, J <jdyou...@ymail.com>

Enlighten us, Dook: do you even know what the term
"bull dyke" means? Or is that just another of your
magic words meant to derail actual debate?

Thinking back over the lesbians I've known in my life,
not a one of them would qualify for that term.

And at least two I can think of left men panting in
their charming, funny, pretty, vivacious wakes, men who
mistakenly thought they had a chance.


Seth

[Seth lePod]

On Oct 30, 4:19 pm, Jeanne Douglas <hlwdj...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
> In article <vqhv889c5s4t7sl16tset3p3cmegjp3...@4ax.com>,
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> > On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 17:16:48 -0700, Jeanne Douglas <hlwdj...@NOSPAMgmail.com>
> > wrote:
>
> > >In article <XnsA0FBB6152BB44nomailverizon...@216.196.121.131>,
> > > Mitchell Holman <nomailverizon.net> wrote:
>
> > >> Jeanne Douglas <hlwdj...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in
> > >>news:hlwdjsd2-A08F8A...@news.giganews.com:
>
> > >> > In article <p1us881nigg1io2mg7vefp2apefef5c...@4ax.com>,

> > >> >  duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>
> > >> >> On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 11:32:42 -0700, Jeanne Douglas

> > >> >> <hlwdj...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
>
> > >> >> >In article <r1fq88h3vm4t6ea3obdsocvefmba8hl...@4ax.com>,

> > >> >> > duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>
> > >> >> >> On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 14:59:03 -0700, Jeanne Douglas

> > >> >> >> <hlwdj...@NOSPAMgmail.com>
> > >> >> >> wrote:
>
> > >> >> >> >In article <62e3k6.sik.1...@news.alt.net>, J <jdyou...@ymail.com>

Duke is constitutionally incapable of failing to have
the last word. Whether it's some other poster having
sunk all his battleships, or whether (as happens
equally often) he's backed himself into a corner
unassisted, he's still compelled to bluster, bluff, try
to divert, utter neck-snapping non-sequiturs, or hurl
insults ("insults" often totally incomprehensible to
anyone other than himself). It can be cringe-inducing
to watch.

Observe now, as he demonstrates my thesis for you:



Seth

[Jeanne Douglas]

In article
<36d52baf-3cbe-419d...@b6g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>,

I'm only hoping that his response is frothing-at-the-mouth amusing.

[Jeanne Douglas]

In article
<e6445e94-6083-4642...@c17g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>,

In other words, you're a real man. Not an archaic stereotype hanging on
to a past that will never come back. And happier for it.

[Kelsey Bjarnason]

On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 18:19:35 -0500, Lady Veteran
<arm...@bigfoot.com> wrote:
> Males who refer to strong women as lesbians can't get it up and
always
> blame her.

> I submit to no one but God. No man on this earth is worthy of that
> much respect.

What I find amusing is that a lot of us who prefer submissive women
prefer strong, self-reliant, intelligent submissive women.

I suspect someone like Tebow would run screaming from a woman such as
that.

[duke]

I don't use starch.

[duke]

On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 16:19:01 -0700, Jeanne Douglas <hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com>

Exactly. And that's why the 2nd half of the comment in the bible is "husbands,
love your wives". Before Jesus, women were property to a man.

>Oh, yeah, and there's the "tell". Dukie has no legitimate answer, so he
>resorts to what he thinks is an insult.

I'm not really a good poker player.

>Why do you think calling someone gay is an insult?

Straight people always see it as an insult.

[duke]

On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 19:42:01 -0700 (PDT), Seth lePod <v.infe...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>> Oh, yeah, and there's the "tell". Dukie has no legitimate answer, so he
>> resorts to what he thinks is an insult.

>Duke is constitutionally incapable of failing to have
>the last word. Whether it's some other poster having
>sunk all his battleships, or whether (as happens
>equally often) he's backed himself into a corner
>unassisted, he's still compelled to bluster, bluff, try
>to divert, utter neck-snapping non-sequiturs, or hurl
>insults ("insults" often totally incomprehensible to
>anyone other than himself). It can be cringe-inducing
>to watch.

>Observe now, as he demonstrates my thesis for you:

I never lie on the ng, gumball.

[duke]

On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 21:47:43 -0700, Jeanne Douglas <hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com>
wrote:

I'm laughing, that's for sure.

[duke]

Oh, yes. Physically and mentally both.

[duke]

On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 16:20:19 -0700, Jeanne Douglas <hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com>

Yes, one to love and to love him back, one he can provide for and to protect.
For it's is the man's calling to do that. We want our women wanting our
strength to give them.

>> A real man loves his wife, and mostly
>> wants to provide for her and care for her.

>A real man wants a partner, not a slave.

Exactly.

[duke]

On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 19:38:51 -0700 (PDT), Seth lePod <v.infe...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>> >> He wants a real marriage - where man and woman love one another en ought to
>> >> place the other's needs first rather than one's personal wants.    That's
>> >> something you dykes don't understand.

>> >He wants a servant, not a wife.
>> He's earning the bacon while his wife scrubs the kitchen flood and makes babies.

>Hmmm...lesee here...thinking back over the women in my
>life, we've got one with a Masters in Speech Therapy,
>another with a Masters in Neurobiology, a third who
>woked with monoclonal antibodies, and a fourth who
>operated one of the top-ranked astronomical telescopes
>in the world.

Do they wear the pants in their families.

>If I want a clean floor and no conversation, I'll get a
>Roomba.

Exactly.

>I prefer my women bright, very bright, and not afraid
>to use it.

Are you the Roomba in your family, gumball?

[duke]

On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 21:51:00 -0700, Jeanne Douglas <hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com>
wrote:

Wrong. I think he just described himself as a Roomba.

>Not an archaic stereotype hanging on
>to a past that will never come back. And happier for it.

[duke]

On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 11:26:53 -0400, Brian E. Clark
<brian...@newsgroup.reply.only> wrote:

>In article <vbfq88ps561bm9ugl...@4ax.com>,
>duckg...@cox.net says...
>
>> You clearly don't now Jesus gave us a dual standard:
>> 1. Men, love your wives (as Jewish women were chattel)
>> 2. Women, be submissive to your husband. (he'll earn the bacon).
>

>I doubt very much that a rabbi would refer to bacon in such
>a positive way. ;-)

Why not? It's safe to eat today. <g>

[Lady Veteran]

Yeah, but limpy is skimpy...

[Lady Veteran]

On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 06:51:05 -0500, duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:

>On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 19:42:01 -0700 (PDT), Seth lePod <v.infe...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>> Oh, yeah, and there's the "tell". Dukie has no legitimate answer, so he
>>> resorts to what he thinks is an insult.
>
>>Duke is constitutionally incapable of failing to have
>>the last word. Whether it's some other poster having
>>sunk all his battleships, or whether (as happens
>>equally often) he's backed himself into a corner
>>unassisted, he's still compelled to bluster, bluff, try
>>to divert, utter neck-snapping non-sequiturs, or hurl
>>insults ("insults" often totally incomprehensible to
>>anyone other than himself). It can be cringe-inducing
>>to watch.
>
>>Observe now, as he demonstrates my thesis for you:
>
>I never lie on the ng, gumball.

Are you afraid you would crush it for being to heavy? Must be all the
lead in your butt.

[Lady Veteran]

On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 16:09:57 -0500, Mitchell Holman
<nomailverizon.net> wrote:

>Lady Veteran <arm...@bigfoot.com> wrote in
>news:ubqv88tb52o36k9dg...@4ax.com:
>
>> On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 17:55:13 -0500, Mitchell Holman

>> <nomailverizon.net> wrote:
>>
>>>Jeanne Douglas <hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in
>>>news:hlwdjsd2-A08F8A...@news.giganews.com:
>>>
>>>> In article <p1us881nigg1io2mg...@4ax.com>,
>>>> duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 11:32:42 -0700, Jeanne Douglas
>>>>> <hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> >In article <r1fq88h3vm4t6ea3o...@4ax.com>,
>>>>> > duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> >> On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 14:59:03 -0700, Jeanne Douglas
>>>>> >> <hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com>
>>>>> >> wrote:
>>>>> >>

>>>>> >> >In article <62e3k6....@news.alt.net>, J <jdyoung1

>> It is a rare religion that does not because almost all are
>> patriarchal. Most females tend to ignore it, which is a good thing.
>>
>
>
> Actually it is a bad thing. Religious women
>shouldn't ignore what they are being told by
>preachers and rabbis, they could confront them.

I agree, but it takes a special person to risk all to confront the
establishment. I work from within the system. It seems to be more
productive. Changing one person at a time seems to have a more lasting
effect.

>That they meekly go along with orders to remain
>submissive to men says as much about them as it
>does the religion.

It does, but it takes a lot of courage to be different. Don't believe
it? Google me.

>[Levi. 15:19] When a woman has a discharge of blood
>which in her regular discharge from her body, she
>shall be apart seven days. And WHOSOEVER TOUCHES
>HER SHALL BE UNCLEAN until the evening. And every
>thing that she lies upon in her SEPARATION shall be
>unclean. Every thing also that SHE SITS UPON SHALL
>BE UNCLEAN. And whosoever touches her bed shall wash
>his clothes and bathe himself in water, and be unclean
>until the evening. And whosoever touches anything THAT
>SHE SAT UPON SHALL WASH HIS CLOTHES, and bathe himself
>in water, and be unclean until the evening.
>
>And if it be on her bed, or any thing whereon she sits
>when he touches it: he SHALL B UNCLEAN UNTIL THE EVENING.
>And if any man lie with her at all, and her flowers be
>upon him: he shall be unclean seven days, and all the
>bed WHEREON SHE LIES SHALL BE UNCLEAN.
>
>But if she be cleansed of her issue, then she shall number
>to herself seven days, and after that she shall be clean.
>And on the eighth day she shall take unto her two turtles
>or two young pigeons, and bring them unto the priest to
>the door of the meeting tent.
>
If she did that now, we would not have a pigeon problem. This may be
in effect in the Orthodox environment, but I think that in modern
countries it went the way of animal sacrifices.

Yeah-that really stinks. How can a human being be unclean because of a
natural thing that happens in their bodies?

[Lady Veteran]

OK so she has a penis-got it.

[Lady Veteran]

Good for you Seth! Education is a lot of fun and full of discussion. I
am working on my Masters in Organizational Psychology.

[Lady Veteran]

No dearie. He said if he wants a clean floor he will get a Roomba.

Are you sure you are educated?

[Lady Veteran]

On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 16:21:48 -0700, Jeanne Douglas
<hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:

>In article <krg098tsd9s9b915r...@4ax.com>,

> Lady Veteran <arm...@bigfoot.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 11:26:53 -0400, Brian E. Clark
>> <brian...@newsgroup.reply.only> wrote:
>>
>> >In article <vbfq88ps561bm9ugl...@4ax.com>,
>> >duckg...@cox.net says...
>> >
>> >> You clearly don't now Jesus gave us a dual standard:
>> >> 1. Men, love your wives (as Jewish women were chattel)
>> >> 2. Women, be submissive to your husband. (he'll earn the bacon).
>> >
>> >I doubt very much that a rabbi would refer to bacon in such
>> >a positive way. ;-)
>>

>> Could be turkey bacon...
>
>Which, of course, is NOT bacon. Yes, it tastes good, but it's in no way
>bacon.

Yeah I know...why can't they make bacon out of beef?

[duke]

But it's not a pain in the neck.

[duke]

On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 09:45:00 -0500, Lady Veteran <arm...@bigfoot.com> wrote:

>On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 06:51:05 -0500, duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 19:42:01 -0700 (PDT), Seth lePod <v.infe...@gmail.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>> Oh, yeah, and there's the "tell". Dukie has no legitimate answer, so he
>>>> resorts to what he thinks is an insult.
>>
>>>Duke is constitutionally incapable of failing to have
>>>the last word. Whether it's some other poster having
>>>sunk all his battleships, or whether (as happens
>>>equally often) he's backed himself into a corner
>>>unassisted, he's still compelled to bluster, bluff, try
>>>to divert, utter neck-snapping non-sequiturs, or hurl
>>>insults ("insults" often totally incomprehensible to
>>>anyone other than himself). It can be cringe-inducing
>>>to watch.
>>
>>>Observe now, as he demonstrates my thesis for you:

>>I never lie on the ng, gumball.
>Are you afraid you would crush it for being to heavy? Must be all the
>lead in your butt.
>LV

Gumballs are not much living outside the glass bubble.

[duke]

She DOES???

[duke]

No, I think he just described himself as a roomba.


>LV

[duke]

On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 16:11:03 -0500, Lady Veteran <arm...@bigfoot.com> wrote:

>On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 14:26:43 -0500, duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 09:49:48 -0500, Lady Veteran <arm...@bigfoot.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 07:32:00 -0500, duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 14:47:53 -0500, Lady Veteran <arm...@bigfoot.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 13:22:09 -0500, duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 11:37:25 -0700 (PDT), Devils Advocaat <manky...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>wrote:

>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On 28 Oct, 14:09, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 14:59:03 -0700, Jeanne Douglas <hlwdj...@NOSPAMgmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> >In article <62e3k6.sik.1...@news.alt.net>, J <jdyou...@ymail.com>
>>>>>>>> >wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> >> One does not need to be a religious person to admire Tim Tebow's
>>>>>>>> >> old-fashioned values.
>>>>>>>> >> Tim Tebow commented in Vogue magazine that he wants a wife with "a
>>>>>>>> >> servant's heart." Of course, he wants a beautiful woman, but he also has
>>>>>>>> >> high standards of character and integrity that are even more important.
>>>>>>>> >> The qualities of a Godly woman and good wife were modeled by his mother
>>>>>>>> >> and sisters, and Tim Tebow learned early on that Biblical principles are
>>>>>>>> >> the best foundation for a marriage relationship.
>>>>>>>> >And Tebow becomes even more disgusting.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> He wants a real marriage - where man and woman love one another en ought to
>>>>>>>> place the other's needs first rather than one's personal wants.    That's
>>>>>>>> something you dykes don't understand.
>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>Excuse me duckegg but that is not what Tebow wants, he wants a wife

>>>>>>>with a servant's heart.
>>>>

>>>>>>Only one can wear the pants. He wants a real woman for a wife, not a dyke.
>>>>>>Contrary to what you yourself might want, the huge majority of men do want a
>>>>>>family they are called to support and feed and be the man of the house for.
>>>>
>>>>You got it, I see.
>>>>
>>>>>>>That means his wants come before her needs, and not what you claim.
>>>>>>Wrong, you don't comprendo.
>>>>
>>>>>I don't think you comprendo, dippy. A marriage is a partnership. There
>>>>>are no his jobs versus her jobs. He has just as much responsibility to
>>>>>change the baby as she does to take out the garbage.
>>>>
>>>>Well, now you're starting to see what I'm getting at.
>>
>>>So why does she have to be a servant?
>>
>>The statement is "servant's heart". Not a servant.
>
>If one has a servant's heart, you usually have a servant to go with
>it. One without the other is useless.
>>
>>>>>Women working outside the home is normal these days and should have
>>>>>happened long before now. If a woman stays home with the children it
>>>>>is because they TALKED it over and agreed it was the right thing to
>>>>>do.
>>
>>>>Fully agreed.
>>
>>>>> He is lucky that he makes enough money so that is not an issue so
>>>>>he can be more picky and go find that "old fashioned woman. If he
>>>>>finds a woman who wants to do that way, it is fine and there is
>>>>>nothing wrong as long as they both agree.
>>>>>LV
>>>
>>>>Outstanding. A real team. And a LV understands that a team has one leader, not
>>>>individual leaders.
>>
>>>A penis does not imbue one with leadership qualities. Freud thought
>>>that and after the Victorian era, he became a laughingstock.
>>
>>Ah, I see. You believe each squad member should be his own leader.

>I believe that since this is not combat, there should be agreement
>among the team members.

Right. That's what I said. One leader in man, one kept follower in woman.

>If your wife likes you with that attitude, fine. She may be the only
>one who does.
>LV

Successful and loving marriages are built on each partner doing right by the
other. You know the old saying, don't you, that a man (or woman) that's happy
at home stays at home.

[duke]

On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 19:36:05 -0700 (PDT), Seth lePod <v.infe...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>On Oct 29, 11:22 am, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>> On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 11:37:25 -0700 (PDT), Devils Advocaat <mankygo...@gmail.com>

>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >On 28 Oct, 14:09, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>> >> On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 14:59:03 -0700, Jeanne Douglas <hlwdj...@NOSPAMgmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>>
>> >> >In article <62e3k6.sik.1...@news.alt.net>, J <jdyou...@ymail.com>
>> >> >wrote:
>>
>> >> >> One does not need to be a religious person to admire Tim Tebow's
>> >> >> old-fashioned values.
>> >> >> Tim Tebow commented in Vogue magazine that he wants a wife with "a
>> >> >> servant's heart." Of course, he wants a beautiful woman, but he also has
>> >> >> high standards of character and integrity that are even more important.
>> >> >> The qualities of a Godly woman and good wife were modeled by his mother
>> >> >> and sisters, and Tim Tebow learned early on that Biblical principles are
>> >> >> the best foundation for a marriage relationship.
>> >> >And Tebow becomes even more disgusting.
>>
>> >> He wants a real marriage - where man and woman love one another en ought to
>> >> place the other's needs first rather than one's personal wants. That's
>> >> something you dykes don't understand.
>>
>> >Excuse me duckegg but that is not what Tebow wants, he wants a wife
>> >with a servant's heart.
>
>:
>> Only one can wear the pants.
>
>

>Wrong. Every relationship I've been in, we worked out
>the important things mutually.

So when do you wear the dress?

>Smaller stuff, like where to eat tonight or who wants
>to be tied up, got resolved in favor of who wanted it
>more at the time.

>> Contrary to what you yourself might want, the huge majority of men do want a
>> family they are called to support and feed and be the man of the house for.

>Yeah?

YEP>

>So, how's that working out for you, Duke?

Wonderful. All successful marriages are that way.

[duke]

On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 16:12:34 -0500, Lady Veteran <arm...@bigfoot.com> wrote:

>On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 14:27:30 -0500, duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 09:51:27 -0500, Lady Veteran <arm...@bigfoot.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 07:35:00 -0500, duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 14:50:43 -0500, Lady Veteran <arm...@bigfoot.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 13:23:32 -0500, duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 18:19:35 -0500, Lady Veteran <arm...@bigfoot.com> wrote:

>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 09:09:28 -0500, duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 14:59:03 -0700, Jeanne Douglas <hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com>
>>>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>In article <62e3k6....@news.alt.net>, J <jdyo...@ymail.com>

>>>>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> One does not need to be a religious person to admire Tim Tebow's
>>>>>>>>>> old-fashioned values.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Tim Tebow commented in Vogue magazine that he wants a wife with "a
>>>>>>>>>> servant's heart." Of course, he wants a beautiful woman, but he also has
>>>>>>>>>> high standards of character and integrity that are even more important.
>>>>>>>>>> The qualities of a Godly woman and good wife were modeled by his mother
>>>>>>>>>> and sisters, and Tim Tebow learned early on that Biblical principles are
>>>>>>>>>> the best foundation for a marriage relationship.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>And Tebow becomes even more disgusting.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>He wants a real marriage - where man and woman love one another en ought to
>>>>>>>>place the other's needs first rather than one's personal wants. That's
>>>>>>>>something you dykes don't understand.
>>>>>>

>>>>>>>Males who refer to strong women as lesbians can't get it up and always
>>>>>>>blame her.
>>>>>>

>>>>>>I'm sure most men would not be interested in a dyke.
>>>>
>>>>>Well I know the dyke would not want them either. Backatcha, sissy boy.
>>>>>You like it when your get it back?
>>>>
>>>>We think a lot alike.
>>>>
>>>>>>>Classic male insecurity permeated biblical times as it does now.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I refuse to believe that Almighty God gave me intelligence and the
>>>>>>>smarts to make it in this world and then says I cannot use it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Then don't expect a man to open the door for you.
>>>>
>>>>>I don't and haven't since a very young age. Do they open the door for
>>>>>you?
>>>>
>>>>Only a mere fraction of the times I opened the door for a woman. I like doing
>>>>it. Me man, take care of woman and children.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>YOu go Tarzan. Cheetah make monkey out of you.
>>
>>No, cheetah chasing bull dykes.
>
>Explain to your wife why talk so much about bull dykes. Are you
>transgender?

No, the beauty is that there is no bull dyke in my family. I see happiness.

[duke]

On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 19:40:14 -0700 (PDT), Seth lePod <v.infe...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>On Oct 30, 12:27 pm, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>> On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 09:51:27 -0500, Lady Veteran <army...@bigfoot.com> wrote:
>> >On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 07:35:00 -0500, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>>
>> >>On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 14:50:43 -0500, Lady Veteran <army...@bigfoot.com> wrote:
>>
>> >>>On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 13:23:32 -0500, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>>
>> >>>>On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 18:19:35 -0500, Lady Veteran <army...@bigfoot.com> wrote:

>>
>> >>>>>On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 09:09:28 -0500, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>>
>> >>>>>>On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 14:59:03 -0700, Jeanne Douglas <hlwdj...@NOSPAMgmail.com>
>> >>>>>>wrote:
>>
>> >>>>>>>In article <62e3k6.sik.1...@news.alt.net>, J <jdyou...@ymail.com>

>Enlighten us, Dook: do you even know what the term
>"bull dyke" means? Or is that just another of your
>magic words meant to derail actual debate?

I don't have any dealings with them, but I can imagine.

>Thinking back over the lesbians I've known in my life,
>not a one of them would qualify for that term.

The only man that hangs around with lesbians is a queer. Everybody gets along
that way.

>And at least two I can think of left men panting in
>their charming, funny, pretty, vivacious wakes, men who
>mistakenly thought they had a chance.

Until these guys found out they were dykes.

[duke]

On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 18:08:00 -0700 (PDT), Father Haskell
<father...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>On Oct 30, 3:28 pm, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>> On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 12:15:55 -0700, linuxgal <linux...@cleanposts.com> wrote:
>> >duke wrote:
>> >> On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 16:04:48 -0700, linuxgal <linux...@cleanposts.com> wrote:
>>
>> >>> John Locke wrote:

>> >>>> On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 12:53:00 -0700, J <jdyou...@ymail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >>>>> One does not need to be a religious person to admire Tim Tebow's

>> >>>>> old-fashioned values...
>>
>> >>>> ...oh, you mean his inane medieval fantasies about subservient women ?
>>
>> >>> Jesus told his followers to pray in private,
>>
>> >> No, he didn't.  He said his Father has no problem hearing you there.
>> >Bible stories carry about as much weight as Bill Cosby's Chicken Heart
>> >that Ate New York.
>>
>> I follow a higher moral code than you do.
>
>I'd rather hear a 40-year old Bill Cosby routine.

That's why God sees you and me differently.

[duke]

On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 19:15:05 -0700, linuxgal <linu...@cleanposts.com> wrote:

>duke wrote:

>> On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 12:15:55 -0700, linuxgal <linu...@cleanposts.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Bible stories carry about as much weight as Bill Cosby's Chicken Heart
>>> that Ate New York.
>>
>> I follow a higher moral code than you do.
>

>Sure, higher moral code, the one that says if you rape a man's daughter,
>you just give him some money and you're good to go.

Nope, not me. Where did you get that one from?

>If you beat a slave
>and he lives for a day or two, it's okay, because he's your property,
>just like a junk car.

Nope, not me. That was the old Jewish way.

> If your kid sasses you back, you can have them
>put to death. If you're a witch, you die. That code.

Nope, not me. That just goes to show you how confused you are.

[Jeanne Douglas]

In article <4h4298hpohoo6fs1d...@4ax.com>,

Where did he do that?

--
JD

"Osama Bin Laden is dead and GM is alive."--VP Joseph Biden

[Jeanne Douglas]

In article <oc42981vui68uhtlc...@4ax.com>,

duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:

> On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 19:38:51 -0700 (PDT), Seth lePod <v.infe...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >> >> He wants a real marriage - where man and woman love one another en
> >> >> ought to
> >> >> place the other's needs first rather than one's personal wants.  
> >> >>  That's
> >> >> something you dykes don't understand.
>
> >> >He wants a servant, not a wife.
> >> He's earning the bacon while his wife scrubs the kitchen flood and makes
> >> babies.
>
> >Hmmm...lesee here...thinking back over the women in my
> >life, we've got one with a Masters in Speech Therapy,
> >another with a Masters in Neurobiology, a third who
> >woked with monoclonal antibodies, and a fourth who
> >operated one of the top-ranked astronomical telescopes
> >in the world.
>
> Do they wear the pants in their families.

Everyone wears pants.

That's one of the stupidest sexist comments going.

> >If I want a clean floor and no conversation, I'll get a
> >Roomba.
>
> Exactly.
>
> >I prefer my women bright, very bright, and not afraid
> >to use it.
>
> Are you the Roomba in your family, gumball?

Where did he say that?