Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Has Cold Fusion been proved?

240 views
Skip to first unread message

Jason

unread,
Oct 23, 2012, 3:21:01 PM10/23/12
to


Has Cold Fusion been proved?

A man named Francesco Celani has proved with a simple experiment that cold
fusion does happen. The new name for Cold Fusion is LENR (Low Energy
Nuclear Reaction).

You can learn all about the simple experiment and all about LENR in the
latest issue of Popular Science magazine.

The story begins on page 62 of the November 2012 issue of Popular Science.

Francesco Celani's simple experiment is discussed on page 97-98 of the
above mentioned magazine.

You need to have access to a science lab to do the simple experiment.


sbalneav

unread,
Oct 23, 2012, 3:43:42 PM10/23/12
to
I look forward to a peer-reviewed paper in Nature or the like.

--
__ _ | I would rather discover one scientific fact
(_ |_) | than become King of Persia.
__)|_) | -- Democritus

Jeanne Douglas

unread,
Oct 23, 2012, 4:12:04 PM10/23/12
to
In article <k66s1c$t2a$2...@dont-email.me>, sbalneav <sbal...@alburg.net>
wrote:

> Jason <Ja...@nospam.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Has Cold Fusion been proved?
> >
> > A man named Francesco Celani has proved with a simple experiment that cold
> > fusion does happen. The new name for Cold Fusion is LENR (Low Energy
> > Nuclear Reaction).
> >
> > You can learn all about the simple experiment and all about LENR in the
> > latest issue of Popular Science magazine.
> >
> > The story begins on page 62 of the November 2012 issue of Popular Science.
> >
> > Francesco Celani's simple experiment is discussed on page 97-98 of the
> > above mentioned magazine.
> >
> > You need to have access to a science lab to do the simple experiment.
>
> I look forward to a peer-reviewed paper in Nature or the like.

Me, too. Cold fusion would open up all kinds of possibilities.

--
JD

"Osama Bin Laden is dead and GM is alive."--VP Joseph Biden

MarkA

unread,
Oct 23, 2012, 4:34:57 PM10/23/12
to
Me, three. The hydrogen atom is the most intensively studied object in
the known Universe. To think that it has hitherto undiscovered properties
is HUGE!

--
MarkA
Keeper of Things Put There Only Just The Night Before
About eight o'clock

raven1

unread,
Oct 23, 2012, 5:42:23 PM10/23/12
to
On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 19:43:42 +0000 (UTC), sbalneav
<sbal...@alburg.net> wrote:

>Jason <Ja...@nospam.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Has Cold Fusion been proved?
>>
>> A man named Francesco Celani has proved with a simple experiment that cold
>> fusion does happen. The new name for Cold Fusion is LENR (Low Energy
>> Nuclear Reaction).
>>
>> You can learn all about the simple experiment and all about LENR in the
>> latest issue of Popular Science magazine.
>>
>> The story begins on page 62 of the November 2012 issue of Popular Science.
>>
>> Francesco Celani's simple experiment is discussed on page 97-98 of the
>> above mentioned magazine.
>>
>> You need to have access to a science lab to do the simple experiment.
>
>I look forward to a peer-reviewed paper in Nature or the like.

If someone actually demonstrated cold fusion, I'd expect to see the
article published first in Nature, Science, or a physics journal, not
a newsstand periodical. This sounds about as dubious as a cancer cure
that misses JAMA and Lancet, but gets published in Men's Health
Magazine instead..

---
raven1
aa # 1096
EAC Vice President (President in charge of vice)
BAAWA Knight

Alex W.

unread,
Oct 23, 2012, 7:56:13 PM10/23/12
to
On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 17:42:23 -0400, raven1 wrote:

>
> If someone actually demonstrated cold fusion, I'd expect to see the
> article published first in Nature, Science, or a physics journal, not
> a newsstand periodical. This sounds about as dubious as a cancer cure
> that misses JAMA and Lancet, but gets published in Men's Health
> Magazine instead..
>

If someone actually demonstrated cold fusion, it would make
we-interrupt-this-broadcast news around the world. Stock markets
would be shut as the shares of all major oil, transport, energy
and car companies would go absolutely haywire. There wouldn't be
a newspaper, radio station, TV or internet news service that
would not throw out everything else to cover this story. It
might well cause chaos and unrest in the streets. Basically, the
only way to not be aware of this would be if you were dead.

Dakota

unread,
Oct 23, 2012, 8:16:08 PM10/23/12
to
Next to the ads for 'miracle cure' copper bracelets and homeopathic
remedies.

Jason

unread,
Oct 23, 2012, 9:14:40 PM10/23/12
to
In article <k66s1c$t2a$2...@dont-email.me>, sbalneav <sbal...@alburg.net> wrote:

> Jason <Ja...@nospam.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Has Cold Fusion been proved?
> >
> > A man named Francesco Celani has proved with a simple experiment that cold
> > fusion does happen. The new name for Cold Fusion is LENR (Low Energy
> > Nuclear Reaction).
> >
> > You can learn all about the simple experiment and all about LENR in the
> > latest issue of Popular Science magazine.
> >
> > The story begins on page 62 of the November 2012 issue of Popular Science.
> >
> > Francesco Celani's simple experiment is discussed on page 97-98 of the
> > above mentioned magazine.
> >
> > You need to have access to a science lab to do the simple experiment.
>
> I look forward to a peer-reviewed paper in Nature or the like.

If you live near Austin, Texas--you can visit a company called Natural
Instruments and ask them about the special conference they will have about
LINR. Francesco Celani will be there and will show off his experiment at
that conference. Why not read the article in Popular Science magazine?


Jason

unread,
Oct 23, 2012, 9:24:03 PM10/23/12
to
In article <irbb2hb1a9lp$.1suy49rx...@40tude.net>,
Popular Science can be purchased at any store that sells magazines. Why
not buy the November issue and read the article. It seems to be a easy
experiment for most any scientist to do if he or she has access to a lab.

The person that wrote the article saw the experiment being done and
actually touched the narrow glass cylinder. He could feel the heat coming
off of it but it did not burn his fingers.

There was a small wire inside of the narrow glass cylinder. The constantan
wire (nickel-copper allow) was roughed up. The glass cylinder was filled
with hydrogen gas.

It's a very simple experiment that could easily be duplicated by most any
scientist that has a lab.


Jason

unread,
Oct 23, 2012, 9:26:53 PM10/23/12
to
In article <hlwdjsd2-30C185...@news.giganews.com>, Jeanne
Why not buy the November 2012 issue of Popular Science and read about the
latest cold fussion experiments?

If I lived near Austin, Texas--I would attend the cold fusion conference
that will take place at the facilities owned by NI (National Instuments).


Jeanne Douglas

unread,
Oct 23, 2012, 9:24:19 PM10/23/12
to

Jason

unread,
Oct 23, 2012, 9:42:46 PM10/23/12
to
In article <hlwdjsd2-F33552...@news.giganews.com>, Jeanne
probably so--the title of the article in the Popular Science magazine is:

Andrea Rossi's Black Box by Steve Featherstone.


Yap

unread,
Oct 23, 2012, 9:44:23 PM10/23/12
to
On Oct 24, 3:10 am, Ja...@nospam.com (Jason) wrote:
> Has Cold Fusion been proved?

Why you care?

The human society does not belong to you who is living for his pixie.
Why are you suddenly interested in science which is human activity?

If there is a pixie in the sky, why should any one trying to put in
hard work to invent something?

You have no slightest credibility to post something relating to
scientific work, unless you believe in humanity and a world of human
for human.

Yap

unread,
Oct 23, 2012, 9:46:55 PM10/23/12
to
Jason, THE STUPID, does not have any idea about anything, let alone
interest in fusion science.

He is as easily misled as a donkey or he is always misreading himself.

sbalneav

unread,
Oct 23, 2012, 10:10:15 PM10/23/12
to
Because any old shit gets into Popular Science. I'm interested in what real
physicists have to say about it.

--
__ _ | I go about looking at horses and cattle. They eat grass, make
(_ |_) | love, work when they have to, bear their young. I am sick
__)|_) | with envy of them. -- Sherwood Anderson

sbalneav

unread,
Oct 23, 2012, 10:13:31 PM10/23/12
to
That's my point. Hence my reference to Nature :) I won't say it doesn't
exist, but I'd like actual scientists to review it.

--
__ _ | Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it,
(_ |_) | doesn't go away.
__)|_) | -- Philip K. Dick

sbalneav

unread,
Oct 23, 2012, 10:20:01 PM10/23/12
to
Jason <Ja...@nospam.com> wrote:
> In article <irbb2hb1a9lp$.1suy49rx...@40tude.net>,
> ing...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 17:42:23 -0400, raven1 wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > If someone actually demonstrated cold fusion, I'd expect to see the
>> > article published first in Nature, Science, or a physics journal, not
>> > a newsstand periodical. This sounds about as dubious as a cancer cure
>> > that misses JAMA and Lancet, but gets published in Men's Health
>> > Magazine instead..
>> >
>>
>> If someone actually demonstrated cold fusion, it would make
>> we-interrupt-this-broadcast news around the world. Stock markets
>> would be shut as the shares of all major oil, transport, energy
>> and car companies would go absolutely haywire. There wouldn't be
>> a newspaper, radio station, TV or internet news service that
>> would not throw out everything else to cover this story. It
>> might well cause chaos and unrest in the streets. Basically, the
>> only way to not be aware of this would be if you were dead.
>
> Popular Science can be purchased at any store that sells magazines. Why
> not buy the November issue and read the article. It seems to be a easy
> experiment for most any scientist to do if he or she has access to a lab.

Sure. I'm sure someone will look into it. Someone with accurate measuring
devices.

> The person that wrote the article saw the experiment being done and
> actually touched the narrow glass cylinder. He could feel the heat coming
> off of it but it did not burn his fingers.
>
> There was a small wire inside of the narrow glass cylinder. The constantan
> wire (nickel-copper allow) was roughed up. The glass cylinder was filled
> with hydrogen gas.

Or so they say. If this *actually* worked, it would, *quite literally* be the
biggest thing in energy production since Alessandro Volta was making frogs legs
twitch. This would put every single energy producing company out of business
practically overnight. Nobel prizes, patents and big money, and probably
science-groupie poontang would be in abundance. So far, what we got is a
show-and-tell, and an article in *cough* Popular Science. Ain't sayin' it
ain't true, just wanting to wait until real propeller-heads pass some judgement
on it.

> It's a very simple experiment that could easily be duplicated by most any
> scientist that has a lab.

Then I would expect it will be.

--
__ _ | I have loved the stars too fondly
(_ |_) | to be fearful of the night.
__)|_) | -- Galileo Galilei

Jeanne Douglas

unread,
Oct 23, 2012, 10:29:20 PM10/23/12
to
Which is the article I posted.

How did you not notice that nobody was allowed to properly test the
mechanism?

Astero...@yahoo.com

unread,
Oct 23, 2012, 11:59:55 PM10/23/12
to
It sure would.

Dakota

unread,
Oct 24, 2012, 12:02:04 AM10/24/12
to
On 10/23/2012 9:10 PM, sbalneav wrote:
> Jason <Ja...@nospam.com> wrote:
>> In article <k66s1c$t2a$2...@dont-email.me>, sbalneav <sbal...@alburg.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Jason <Ja...@nospam.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Has Cold Fusion been proved?
>>>>
>>>> A man named Francesco Celani has proved with a simple experiment that cold
>>>> fusion does happen. The new name for Cold Fusion is LENR (Low Energy
>>>> Nuclear Reaction).
>>>>
>>>> You can learn all about the simple experiment and all about LENR in the
>>>> latest issue of Popular Science magazine.
>>>>
>>>> The story begins on page 62 of the November 2012 issue of Popular Science.
>>>>
>>>> Francesco Celani's simple experiment is discussed on page 97-98 of the
>>>> above mentioned magazine.
>>>>
>>>> You need to have access to a science lab to do the simple experiment.
>>>
>>> I look forward to a peer-reviewed paper in Nature or the like.
>>
>> If you live near Austin, Texas--you can visit a company called Natural
>> Instruments and ask them about the special conference they will have about
>> LINR. Francesco Celani will be there and will show off his experiment at
>> that conference. Why not read the article in Popular Science magazine?
>
> Because any old shit gets into Popular Science. I'm interested in what real
> physicists have to say about it.
>
The fact that Jason started this thread is cause enough to regard it
with a skeptical eye as Jason's grasp of reality is tenuous at best.

Not sure if this is the PopSci article he's talking about but it does
address LENR. Celani's contribution begins at the bottom of page 6.

http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2012-10/andrea-rossis-black-box

Here's the last paragraph:

I asked Celani why he thought NI had invited him to the conference. He
stopped what he was doing and looked around the chaos of his lab, as
if searching for the answer among all the defunct LENR cells he�d
built to replicate various experiments dating back to the early days
of cold fusion, experiments that helped push the field, watt by watt,
closer to legitimacy. �I don�t know,� Celani said, and burst into
laughter.

Here's a link to Celani's exhibit at NI's LENR conference:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xe5rcEvsek0&feature=youtu.be

The conference looks like a sophisticated high school science fair
with booths set up for the various exhibits. I think it's reasonable
to remain skeptical until more rigorous examination of the supposed
technology is documented.

Jason

unread,
Oct 24, 2012, 12:55:55 AM10/24/12
to
In article
<71bcf6de-7f9f-4e34...@vy11g2000pbb.googlegroups.com>, Yap
<hhya...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Oct 24, 3:10=A0am, Ja...@nospam.com (Jason) wrote:
> > Has Cold Fusion been proved?
>
> Why you care?
>
> The human society does not belong to you who is living for his pixie.
>
> >
> > A man named Francesco Celani has proved with a simple experiment that col=
> d
> > fusion does happen. The new name for Cold Fusion is LENR (Low Energy
> > Nuclear Reaction).
> >
> > You can learn all about the simple experiment and all about LENR in the
> > latest issue of Popular Science magazine.
> >
> > The story begins on page 62 of the November 2012 issue of Popular Science=
> .
> >
> > Francesco Celani's simple experiment is discussed on page 97-98 of the
> > above mentioned magazine.
> >
> > You need to have access to a science lab to do the simple experiment.
>
> Why are you suddenly interested in science which is human activity?
>
> If there is a pixie in the sky, why should any one trying to put in
> hard work to invent something?
>
> You have no slightest credibility to post something relating to
> scientific work, unless you believe in humanity and a world of human
> for human.

http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2012-10/andrea-rossis-black-box


Jason

unread,
Oct 24, 2012, 12:57:08 AM10/24/12
to

Jason

unread,
Oct 24, 2012, 1:08:03 AM10/24/12
to

Jason

unread,
Oct 24, 2012, 1:07:18 AM10/24/12
to
In article <hlwdjsd2-76707F...@news.giganews.com>, Jeanne
It clearly stated in the article the following information:

"Most important, Celani was not working in secrecy. Any scientist could
replicate his experiment."

The author of the article had this to say about Celani's experiments:

"...absolutely precise and well described experiments..."

It was my opinion that Celani's experiment was so easy to do that almost
any good scientist in the world that has access to a lab could easily
duplicate Celani's very simple experiment.



Did you read the entire article? I did.


Jason

unread,
Oct 24, 2012, 1:10:38 AM10/24/12
to
In article <k67im5$pdi$1...@dont-email.me>, sbalneav <sbal...@alburg.net> wrote:

> Jason <Ja...@nospam.com> wrote:
> > In article <k66s1c$t2a$2...@dont-email.me>, sbalneav
<sbal...@alburg.net> wrote:
> >
> >> Jason <Ja...@nospam.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Has Cold Fusion been proved?
> >> >
> >> > A man named Francesco Celani has proved with a simple experiment
that cold
> >> > fusion does happen. The new name for Cold Fusion is LENR (Low Energy
> >> > Nuclear Reaction).
> >> >
> >> > You can learn all about the simple experiment and all about LENR in the
> >> > latest issue of Popular Science magazine.
> >> >
> >> > The story begins on page 62 of the November 2012 issue of Popular
Science.
> >> >
> >> > Francesco Celani's simple experiment is discussed on page 97-98 of the
> >> > above mentioned magazine.
> >> >
> >> > You need to have access to a science lab to do the simple experiment.
> >>
> >> I look forward to a peer-reviewed paper in Nature or the like.
> >
> > If you live near Austin, Texas--you can visit a company called Natural
> > Instruments and ask them about the special conference they will have about
> > LINR. Francesco Celani will be there and will show off his experiment at
> > that conference. Why not read the article in Popular Science magazine?
>
> Because any old shit gets into Popular Science. I'm interested in what real
> physicists have to say about it.

Some real physicists will probably be attending the conference that will
be taking place in Austin, Texas in the very near future. They will be
watching the cold fusion experiments being done in front of them.


Jason

unread,
Oct 24, 2012, 1:14:25 AM10/24/12
to
> if searching for the answer among all the defunct LENR cells he’d
> built to replicate various experiments dating back to the early days
> of cold fusion, experiments that helped push the field, watt by watt,
> closer to legitimacy. “I don’t know,” Celani said, and burst into
> laughter.
>
> Here's a link to Celani's exhibit at NI's LENR conference:
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xe5rcEvsek0&feature=youtu.be
>
> The conference looks like a sophisticated high school science fair
> with booths set up for the various exhibits. I think it's reasonable
> to remain skeptical until more rigorous examination of the supposed
> technology is documented.

It's my guess that lots of scientists will be attending the LENR
conference in Austin, Texas. If I lived in Austin, Texas, I would attend
that conference and watch Celani perform his experiment in front of me.


SkyEyes

unread,
Oct 24, 2012, 1:10:54 AM10/24/12
to
On Oct 23, 7:10 pm, sbalneav <sbaln...@alburg.net> wrote:
> Jason <Ja...@nospam.com> wrote:
> > In article <k66s1c$t2...@dont-email.me>, sbalneav <sbaln...@alburg.net> wrote:
>
> >> Jason <Ja...@nospam.com> wrote:
>
> >> > Has Cold Fusion been proved?
>
> >> > A man named Francesco Celani has proved with a simple experiment that cold
> >> > fusion does happen. The new name for Cold Fusion is LENR (Low Energy
> >> > Nuclear Reaction).
>
> >> > You can learn all about the simple experiment and all about LENR in the
> >> > latest issue of Popular Science magazine.
>
> >> > The story begins on page 62 of the November 2012 issue of Popular Science.
>
> >> > Francesco Celani's simple experiment is discussed on page 97-98 of the
> >> > above mentioned magazine.
>
> >> > You need to have access to a science lab to do the simple experiment.
>
> >> I look forward to a peer-reviewed paper in Nature or the like.
>
> > If you live near Austin, Texas--you can visit a company called Natural
> > Instruments and ask them about the special conference they will have about
> > LINR. Francesco Celani will be there and will show off his experiment at
> > that conference. Why not read the article in Popular Science magazine?
>
> Because any old shit gets into Popular Science.

Hence the name, "Popular" Science. As opposed to, say, "Real"
Science.

> I'm interested in what real physicists have to say about it.

I honestly hope it's the real thing. It would solve *so* many
problems, the biggest being our hunger for fossil fuels.

It would make the coal mining folks very unhappy, however, and the
fracking-for-natural-gas people wouldn't be in much better spirits.

Brenda Nelson, A.A.#34 and A+ atheist
BAAWA Knight of the Golden Litterbox
EAC Professor of Feline Thermometrics and Cat-Herding
skyeyes nine at cox dot net OR
skyeyes nine at yahoo dot com


Jason

unread,
Oct 24, 2012, 1:48:57 AM10/24/12
to
In article
<68514a0d-0ab3-422b...@i2g2000pbi.googlegroups.com>,
SkyEyes <skye...@cox.net> wrote:

> On Oct 23, 7:10=A0pm, sbalneav <sbaln...@alburg.net> wrote:
> > Jason <Ja...@nospam.com> wrote:
> > > In article <k66s1c$t2...@dont-email.me>, sbalneav <sbaln...@alburg.net>=
> wrote:
> >
> > >> Jason <Ja...@nospam.com> wrote:
> >
> > >> > Has Cold Fusion been proved?
> >
> > >> > A man named Francesco Celani has proved with a simple experiment tha=
> t cold
> > >> > fusion does happen. The new name for Cold Fusion is LENR (Low Energy
> > >> > Nuclear Reaction).
> >
> > >> > You can learn all about the simple experiment and all about LENR in =
> the
> > >> > latest issue of Popular Science magazine.
> >
> > >> > The story begins on page 62 of the November 2012 issue of Popular Sc=
> ience.
> >
> > >> > Francesco Celani's simple experiment is discussed on page 97-98 of t=
> he
> > >> > above mentioned magazine.
> >
> > >> > You need to have access to a science lab to do the simple experiment=
> .
> >
> > >> I look forward to a peer-reviewed paper in Nature or the like.
> >
> > > If you live near Austin, Texas--you can visit a company called Natural
> > > Instruments and ask them about the special conference they will have ab=
> out
> > > LINR. Francesco Celani will be there and will show off his experiment a=
> t
> > > that conference. Why not read the article in Popular Science magazine?
> >
> > Because any old shit gets into Popular Science.
>
> Hence the name, "Popular" Science. As opposed to, say, "Real"
> Science.
>
> > I'm interested in what real physicists have to say about it.
>
> I honestly hope it's the real thing. It would solve *so* many
> problems, the biggest being our hunger for fossil fuels.
>
> It would make the coal mining folks very unhappy, however, and the
> fracking-for-natural-gas people wouldn't be in much better spirits.
>
> Brenda Nelson, A.A.#34 and A+ atheist
> BAAWA Knight of the Golden Litterbox
> EAC Professor of Feline Thermometrics and Cat-Herding
> skyeyes nine at cox dot net OR
> skyeyes nine at yahoo dot com

<http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2012-10/andrea-rossis-black-box


Jeanne Douglas

unread,
Oct 24, 2012, 2:22:26 AM10/24/12
to
I'm guessing the buggy whip people weren't very happy, either.

But if industries have to be phased out for national and international
security reasons, it'll be the government's responsibility to help the
workers shift to a new industry. And I mean real training and job
placement, not the weak-tea version inadequate budgets force.

Jeanne Douglas

unread,
Oct 24, 2012, 2:23:14 AM10/24/12
to
In article <Jason-23101...@66.53.221.144>,
That's completely meaningless, nothing better than a story in the bible.

The ONLY thing that matters is the data and being able to replicate the
results.

Jeanne Douglas

unread,
Oct 24, 2012, 2:28:45 AM10/24/12
to
In article <Jason-23101...@66.53.221.144>,
Then we wait until they have done so before we get excited.

See, if you had posted the article with the comment that it would be
really cool if this turns out to be true so you hope physicists will
hurry up and replicate the experiment so we can get on with it.

> Did you read the entire article? I did.

It's not sounding like it.

Syd M.

unread,
Oct 24, 2012, 7:59:57 AM10/24/12
to
On Oct 23, 10:29 pm, Jeanne Douglas <hlwdj...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
> In article
> <Jason-2310121842470...@67-150-126-253.lsan.mdsg-pacwest.com>,
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  Ja...@nospam.com (Jason) wrote:
> > In article <hlwdjsd2-F33552.18241923102...@news.giganews.com>, Jeanne
> > Douglas <hlwdj...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > In article
> > > <Jason-2310121824030...@67-150-126-253.lsan.mdsg-pacwest.com>,
> > >  Ja...@nospam.com (Jason) wrote:
>
> > > > In article <irbb2hb1a9lp$.1suy49rxa4tgt....@40tude.net>,
A dead giveaway that it's all fake.

fur...@mail.croydon.ac.uk

unread,
Oct 24, 2012, 9:21:57 AM10/24/12
to
On 24 Oct, 02:16, Ja...@nospam.com (Jason) wrote:
> In article <hlwdjsd2-30C185.13120423102...@news.giganews.com>, Jeanne
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Douglas <hlwdj...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
> > In article <k66s1c$t2...@dont-email.me>, sbalneav <sbaln...@alburg.net>
> > wrote:
>
> > > Jason <Ja...@nospam.com> wrote:
>
> > > > Has Cold Fusion been proved?
>
> > > > A man named Francesco Celani has proved with a simple experiment that cold
> > > > fusion does happen. The new name for Cold Fusion is LENR (Low Energy
> > > > Nuclear Reaction).
>
> > > > You can learn all about the simple experiment and all about LENR in the
> > > > latest issue of Popular Science magazine.
>
> > > > The story begins on page 62 of the November 2012 issue of Popular
> Science.
>
> > > > Francesco Celani's simple experiment is discussed on page 97-98 of the
> > > > above mentioned magazine.
>
> > > > You need to have access to a science lab to do the simple experiment.
>
> > > I look forward to a peer-reviewed paper in Nature or the like.
>
> > Me, too. Cold fusion would open up all kinds of possibilities.
>
> Why not buy the November 2012 issue of Popular Science and read about the
> latest cold fussion experiments?
>
> If I lived near Austin, Texas--I would attend the cold fusion conference
> that will take place at the facilities owned by NI (National Instuments).- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

It is possible to get to Austin, Texas from just about any inhabited
part of the world in about a day. If you think anything interesting
will happen there why don't you go, and report back what you hear?

Malcolm McMahon

unread,
Oct 24, 2012, 9:24:36 AM10/24/12
to
On Tuesday, 23 October 2012 22:42:20 UTC+1, raven1 wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 19:43:42 +0000 (UTC), sbalneav
>
> <sbal...@alburg.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> >Jason <Ja...@nospam.com> wrote:
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >> Has Cold Fusion been proved?
>
> >>
>
> >> A man named Francesco Celani has proved with a simple experiment that cold
>
> >> fusion does happen. The new name for Cold Fusion is LENR (Low Energy
>
> >> Nuclear Reaction).
>
> >>
>
> >> You can learn all about the simple experiment and all about LENR in the
>
> >> latest issue of Popular Science magazine.
>
> >>
>
> >> The story begins on page 62 of the November 2012 issue of Popular Science.
>
> >>
>
> >> Francesco Celani's simple experiment is discussed on page 97-98 of the
>
> >> above mentioned magazine.
>
> >>
>
> >> You need to have access to a science lab to do the simple experiment.
>
> >
>
> >I look forward to a peer-reviewed paper in Nature or the like.
>
>
>
> If someone actually demonstrated cold fusion, I'd expect to see the
>
> article published first in Nature, Science, or a physics journal, not
>
> a newsstand periodical. This sounds about as dubious as a cancer cure
>
> that misses JAMA and Lancet, but gets published in Men's Health
>
> Magazine instead..
>
>

Mind you, there were a lot of red faces over the Flieshman/Pons affair so scientists will be pretty wary.

harry k

unread,
Oct 24, 2012, 10:45:18 AM10/24/12
to
On Oct 23, 6:16 pm, Ja...@nospam.com (Jason) wrote:
> In article <hlwdjsd2-30C185.13120423102...@news.giganews.com>, Jeanne
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Douglas <hlwdj...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
> > In article <k66s1c$t2...@dont-email.me>, sbalneav <sbaln...@alburg.net>
> > wrote:
>
> > > Jason <Ja...@nospam.com> wrote:
>
> > > > Has Cold Fusion been proved?
>
> > > > A man named Francesco Celani has proved with a simple experiment that cold
> > > > fusion does happen. The new name for Cold Fusion is LENR (Low Energy
> > > > Nuclear Reaction).
>
> > > > You can learn all about the simple experiment and all about LENR in the
> > > > latest issue of Popular Science magazine.
>
> > > > The story begins on page 62 of the November 2012 issue of Popular
> Science.
>
> > > > Francesco Celani's simple experiment is discussed on page 97-98 of the
> > > > above mentioned magazine.
>
> > > > You need to have access to a science lab to do the simple experiment.
>
> > > I look forward to a peer-reviewed paper in Nature or the like.
>
> > Me, too. Cold fusion would open up all kinds of possibilities.
>
> Why not buy the November 2012 issue of Popular Science and read about the
> latest cold fussion experiments?
>
> If I lived near Austin, Texas--I would attend the cold fusion conference
> that will take place at the facilities owned by NI (National Instuments).

Do you _really_ think such a discovery would be published first in
Popular Science?

Gullible much are you?

Harry K

harry k

unread,
Oct 24, 2012, 10:50:20 AM10/24/12
to
On Oct 23, 6:31 pm, Ja...@nospam.com (Jason) wrote:
> In article <hlwdjsd2-F33552.18241923102...@news.giganews.com>, Jeanne
>
>
>
>
>
> Douglas <hlwdj...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
> > In article
> > <Jason-2310121824030...@67-150-126-253.lsan.mdsg-pacwest.com>,
> >  Ja...@nospam.com (Jason) wrote:
>
> > > In article <irbb2hb1a9lp$.1suy49rxa4tgt....@40tude.net>,
So a "convicted scam artist" conducts a demonstration of a contraption
no one is
allowed to exam but runs on a "secret catalyst"...

You're not gullible, you're downright stupid.

Harry K

MarkA

unread,
Oct 24, 2012, 11:07:38 AM10/24/12
to
On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 12:21:01 -0700, Jason wrote:

>
>
> Has Cold Fusion been proved?
>
> A man named Francesco Celani has proved with a simple experiment that cold
> fusion does happen. The new name for Cold Fusion is LENR (Low Energy
> Nuclear Reaction).
>
> You can learn all about the simple experiment and all about LENR in the
> latest issue of Popular Science magazine.
>
> The story begins on page 62 of the November 2012 issue of Popular Science.
>
> Francesco Celani's simple experiment is discussed on page 97-98 of the
> above mentioned magazine.
>
> You need to have access to a science lab to do the simple experiment.

It sounds more like a break through in magazine marketing than a discovery
that will rock the foundations of particle physics. Pons and Fleischmann
announced the discovery of a method for producing cold fusion in 1989.
That's 23 years ago. In that time, nobody has been able to reliably and
consistently demonstrate that nuclear fusion is really occurring. What
they observed is considered by the physics community to be most likely an
interesting electro-chemical effect.

Despite the lack of progress, or any plausible mechanism by which it even
*could* occur, a community of "cold-fusion true believers" has sprung up,
and continues to be "on the verge" of clearly demonstrating that LENR is
real.

As I pointed out in another post, the hydrogen atom is the single most
intensively studied object in the world. It is exceedingly unlikely that
there are things it can do that have not yet been observed. That doesn't
mean that it's impossible, but if such properties were discovered, I doubt
if the pages of Popular Science would be the first to publish it, nor
would it be something you could produce with a simple laboratory
experiment.

Fusion occurs when 2 hydrogen nuclei, i.e. protons, bind together to form
a helium nucleus. Since protons are positively charged, as you push them
together, the electrostatic charge wants to repel them from each other. It
takes a *tremendous* amount of energy to push them together with enough
force to overcome the electrostatic force, and get them close enough for
the strong nuclear force to take over, fusing them into a single entity.
Once that happens, and even greater tremendous amount of energy is
released. The scale of the energies involved is the reason why nobody has,
so far, been able to make fusion happen without vaporizing everything
within a radius of several kilometers.

How much do you want to bet that Dr(?) Celani, and the folks at "Natural
Instruments", are still buying their electricity from the local power
utility?

--
MarkA

If you can read this, you can stop reading now.


sbalneav

unread,
Oct 24, 2012, 11:22:30 AM10/24/12
to
Yeah, that's the article in Popular Science. Like I say, when it gets peer
reviewed in Science or Nature, AND once there's been some experimental
verification, I'll be happy to believe it. I'm witholding judgement until
then.

--
__ _ | Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak;
(_ |_) | courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen.
__)|_) | -- Winston Churchill

sbalneav

unread,
Oct 24, 2012, 11:28:13 AM10/24/12
to
From the article:

"Rossi isn???t the best ambassador for a field with credibility problems, though.
In the ???80s, he invented a machine that magically transformed household garbage
and industrial waste into oil???only it didn???t create a drop. Leaky storage tanks
at Rossi???s ???poison factory,??? as one Italian newspaper called it, contained
77,000 tons of toxic sludge that cost $50 million to clean up. While under
investigation for environmental crimes, Rossi was also charged with gold
trafficking; he went to jail for six months and was later acquitted. As it
happens, his engineering degree is from Kensington University, a notorious
diploma mill shut down in 1996 by the state of California."

"When I got off the plane in Italy, the weather was brutally hot. Driving to my
hotel, air-conditioning cranked up, I thought about the carbon my car was
pumping into the atmosphere, my small contribution to a repeat of the Permian
extinction that Dennis Bushnell warned about. When I got to my hotel, I fired
up my laptop and checked my e-mail. There was a terse message from Rossi
canceling our interview. No explanation. Given what I???d heard about Rossi???s
capricious temper, I suspected something like this might happen, but not before
I???d unpacked my suitcase. I dashed off a bewildered reply and got a response
within the hour:

I REPEAT THAT I WILL NOT RELEASE ANY INTERVIEW. I HAVE TO WORK AND I HAVE NOT
TIME AT ALL TO POLEMIZE WITH ENEMIES, COMPETITORS, ETC. THE RESULTS OF MY WORK
WILL BE JUDGED BY THE CUSTOMERS, NOT BY THE CHATTERS."

I smell con. That's not the way real science works. You don't hide your
discoveries in real scientific work.

--
__ _ | The book you don't read won't help.
(_ |_) | -- Jim Rohn
__)|_) |

Mike Painter

unread,
Oct 24, 2012, 12:18:08 PM10/24/12
to
On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 12:21:01 -0700, Ja...@nospam.com (Jason) wrote:

>
>
>Has Cold Fusion been proved?
>
>A man named Francesco Celani has proved with a simple experiment that cold
>fusion does happen. The new name for Cold Fusion is LENR (Low Energy
>Nuclear Reaction).
>
>You can learn all about the simple experiment and all about LENR in the
>latest issue of Popular Science magazine.
>
>The story begins on page 62 of the November 2012 issue of Popular Science.
>
>Francesco Celani's simple experiment is discussed on page 97-98 of the
>above mentioned magazine.
>
>You need to have access to a science lab to do the simple experiment.
>
http://newenergyandfuel.com/http:/newenergyandfuel/com/2012/08/08/francesco-celani-demos-his-lenr-device-publicly/

is about all I can find and it's a bit suspect.
--
"When one person suffers from a delusion it is called insanity. When many people suffer from a delusion it is called religion." ~ Robert Pirsig

Jason

unread,
Oct 24, 2012, 4:18:22 PM10/24/12
to
In article <hlwdjsd2-1985E7...@news.giganews.com>, Jeanne
Thanks for providing us with the website. That was a kind thing to do.


Jason

unread,
Oct 24, 2012, 4:22:19 PM10/24/12
to
In article <1v4g88lkdf1jjlr8k...@4ax.com>, Mike Painter
Andrea Rossi seems to want to keep whatever is inside his black box a
secret but my new hero Francesco Celani wants every scientist in the world
to duplicate his simple experiment.


Jason

unread,
Oct 24, 2012, 4:29:40 PM10/24/12
to
In article <pan.2012.10.24....@somewhere.invalid>, MarkA
They are buying their electricity from the local power utility. That does
not mean the LENR experiments mean nothing.

I know someone that once had solar panels on the roof of their home and
she told me they rarely paid any money to the local power utility. In
fact, she said on some months the local power utility sent them a check
instead of a bill.

Perhaps in 20 years, most local power utility companies will be making use
of LENR devices to produce electricity.


Jason

unread,
Oct 24, 2012, 4:30:35 PM10/24/12
to
In article
<67420fb2-4dfd-4673...@k6g2000vbr.googlegroups.com>,
I can't afford to do it.


Jason

unread,
Oct 24, 2012, 4:36:04 PM10/24/12
to
In article
<0514afc1-b03d-4d5a...@v9g2000pbi.googlegroups.com>, harry
k <tur...@q.com> wrote:

> On Oct 23, 6:16=A0pm, Ja...@nospam.com (Jason) wrote:
> > In article <hlwdjsd2-30C185.13120423102...@news.giganews.com>, Jeanne
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Douglas <hlwdj...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
> > > In article <k66s1c$t2...@dont-email.me>, sbalneav <sbaln...@alburg.net>
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > > Jason <Ja...@nospam.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > Has Cold Fusion been proved?
> >
> > > > > A man named Francesco Celani has proved with a simple experiment th=
> at cold
> > > > > fusion does happen. The new name for Cold Fusion is LENR (Low Energ=
> y
> > > > > Nuclear Reaction).
> >
> > > > > You can learn all about the simple experiment and all about LENR in=
> the
> > > > > latest issue of Popular Science magazine.
> >
> > > > > The story begins on page 62 of the November 2012 issue of Popular
> > Science.
> >
> > > > > Francesco Celani's simple experiment is discussed on page 97-98 of =
> the
> > > > > above mentioned magazine.
> >
> > > > > You need to have access to a science lab to do the simple experimen=
> t.
> >
> > > > I look forward to a peer-reviewed paper in Nature or the like.
> >
> > > Me, too. Cold fusion would open up all kinds of possibilities.
> >
> > Why not buy the November 2012 issue of Popular Science and read about the
> > latest cold fussion experiments?
> >
> > If I lived near Austin, Texas--I would attend the cold fusion conference
> > that will take place at the facilities owned by NI (National Instuments).
>
> Do you _really_ think such a discovery would be published first in
> Popular Science?
>
> Gullible much are you?
>
> Harry K

There will be articles in those types of magazines once scientists are
able to easily duplicate the LENR experiments and LENR devices.

That is the reason the conference in the NI facility in Austin, Texas is
important. Lots of scientists will be at that conference.


Jason

unread,
Oct 24, 2012, 4:41:05 PM10/24/12
to
His simple experiment can easily be duplicated by scientists that have
access to a lab. If they attend the conference in Austin, Texas--they can
watch Francisco Celani perform the simple experiment in front of them.

His result will be judged by the customers and scientists--not by the chatter.


Jason

unread,
Oct 24, 2012, 4:44:08 PM10/24/12
to
In article
<628ad003-8039-4606...@b4g2000pby.googlegroups.com>, harry
k <tur...@q.com> wrote:

> On Oct 23, 6:31=A0pm, Ja...@nospam.com (Jason) wrote:
> > In article <hlwdjsd2-F33552.18241923102...@news.giganews.com>, Jeanne
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Douglas <hlwdj...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
> > > In article
> > > <Jason-2310121824030...@67-150-126-253.lsan.mdsg-pacwest.com>,
> > > =A0Ja...@nospam.com (Jason) wrote:
> >
> > > > In article <irbb2hb1a9lp$.1suy49rxa4tgt....@40tude.net>,
> > > > ing...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
> >
> > > > > On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 17:42:23 -0400, raven1 wrote:
> >
> > > > > > If someone actually demonstrated cold fusion, I'd expect to see t=
> he
> > > > > > article published first in Nature, Science, or a physics journal,=
> not
> > > > > > a newsstand periodical. This sounds about as dubious as a cancer =
> cure
> > > > > > that misses JAMA and Lancet, but gets published in Men's Health
> > > > > > Magazine instead..
> >
> > > > > If someone actually demonstrated cold fusion, it would make
> > > > > we-interrupt-this-broadcast news around the world. =A0Stock markets
> > > > > would be shut as the shares of all major oil, transport, energy
> > > > > and car companies would go absolutely haywire. =A0There wouldn't be
> > > > > a newspaper, radio station, TV or internet news service that
> > > > > would not throw out everything else to cover this story. =A0It
> > > > > might well cause chaos and unrest in the streets. =A0Basically, the
> > > > > only way to not be aware of this would be if you were dead.
> >
> > > > Popular Science can be purchased at any store that sells magazines. W=
> hy
> > > > not buy the November issue and read the article. It seems to be a eas=
> y
> > > > experiment for most any scientist to do if he or she has access to a =
> lab.
> >
> > > > The person that wrote the article saw the experiment being done and
> > > > actually touched the narrow glass cylinder. He could feel the heat co=
> ming
> > > > off of it but it did not burn his fingers.
> >
> > > > There was a small wire inside of the narrow glass cylinder. The const=
> antan
> > > > wire (nickel-copper allow) was roughed up. The glass cylinder was fil=
> led
> > > > with hydrogen gas.
> >
> > > > It's a very simple experiment that could easily be duplicated by most=
> any
> > > > scientist that has a lab.
> >
> > > Is this it?
> >
> > > <http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2012-10/andrea-rossis-black-box>
> >
> > probably so--the title of the article in the Popular Science magazine is:
> >
> > Andrea Rossi's Black Box by Steve Featherstone.
>
> So a "convicted scam artist" conducts a demonstration of a contraption
> no one is
> allowed to exam but runs on a "secret catalyst"...
>
> You're not gullible, you're downright stupid.
>
> Harry K

Rossi is hoping to get rich so don't want people to steal his secrets that
are inside his black box. He was not invited to the conference. The reason
is probably because he is not willing to share his secrets or open the
black box so scientists can see what is inside it.


Jason

unread,
Oct 24, 2012, 4:47:26 PM10/24/12
to
In article
<e2af16b3-988c-4e80...@b15g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>, "Syd
M." <pauldav...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> On Oct 23, 10:29=A0pm, Jeanne Douglas <hlwdj...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
> > In article
> > <Jason-2310121842470...@67-150-126-253.lsan.mdsg-pacwest.com>,
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > =A0Ja...@nospam.com (Jason) wrote:
> > > In article <hlwdjsd2-F33552.18241923102...@news.giganews.com>, Jeanne
> > > Douglas <hlwdj...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > In article
> > > > <Jason-2310121824030...@67-150-126-253.lsan.mdsg-pacwest.com>,
> > > > =A0Ja...@nospam.com (Jason) wrote:
> >
> > > > > In article <irbb2hb1a9lp$.1suy49rxa4tgt....@40tude.net>,
> > > > > ing...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
> >
> > > > > > On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 17:42:23 -0400, raven1 wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > If someone actually demonstrated cold fusion, I'd expect to see=
> the
> > > > > > > article published first in Nature, Science, or a physics journa=
> l, not
> > > > > > > a newsstand periodical. This sounds about as dubious as a cance=
> r cure
> > > > > > > that misses JAMA and Lancet, but gets published in Men's Health
> > > > > > > Magazine instead..
> >
> > > > > > If someone actually demonstrated cold fusion, it would make
> > > > > > we-interrupt-this-broadcast news around the world. =A0Stock marke=
> ts
> > > > > > would be shut as the shares of all major oil, transport, energy
> > > > > > and car companies would go absolutely haywire. =A0There wouldn't =
> be
> > > > > > a newspaper, radio station, TV or internet news service that
> > > > > > would not throw out everything else to cover this story. =A0It
> > > > > > might well cause chaos and unrest in the streets. =A0Basically, t=
> he
> > > > > > only way to not be aware of this would be if you were dead.
> >
> > > > > Popular Science can be purchased at any store that sells magazines.=
> Why
> > > > > not buy the November issue and read the article. It seems to be a e=
> asy
> > > > > experiment for most any scientist to do if he or she has access to =
> a lab.
> >
> > > > > The person that wrote the article saw the experiment being done and
> > > > > actually touched the narrow glass cylinder. He could feel the heat =
> coming
> > > > > off of it but it did not burn his fingers.
> >
> > > > > There was a small wire inside of the narrow glass cylinder. The con=
> stantan
> > > > > wire (nickel-copper allow) was roughed up. The glass cylinder was f=
> illed
> > > > > with hydrogen gas.
> >
> > > > > It's a very simple experiment that could easily be duplicated by mo=
> st any
> > > > > scientist that has a lab.
> >
> > > > Is this it?
> >
> > > > <http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2012-10/andrea-rossis-black-bo=
> x>
> >
> > > probably so--the title of the article in the Popular Science magazine i=
> s:
> >
> > > Andrea Rossi's Black Box by Steve Featherstone.
> >
> > Which is the article I posted.
> >
> > How did you not notice that nobody was allowed to properly test the
> > mechanism?
> >
> >
>
> A dead giveaway that it's all fake.

I got the impression that Rossi is hoping to get rich and that is the
reason he will not open up that box to allow anyone to see what is inside
of it.

However, other people that will be attending the conference will be
willing to share their secrets. They will not have any black boxes that
they refuse to open--at least I hope so.


Jason

unread,
Oct 24, 2012, 4:50:12 PM10/24/12
to
In article <hlwdjsd2-FFF780...@news.giganews.com>, Jeanne
You are correct. Francisco Celani was willing to show his data to the
author of the article and anyone else that wants to see his data. He will
be at the conference and will do the experiment in front of the people
that will be attending the conference.

It appears to me to be a very simple experiment that would be easy for a
scientist to duplicate.


Syd M.

unread,
Oct 24, 2012, 5:04:06 PM10/24/12
to
If he had tried it with real scientists, he'd have been laughed off
the stage.

Syd M.

unread,
Oct 24, 2012, 5:05:08 PM10/24/12
to
On Oct 24, 4:36 pm, Ja...@nospam.com (Jason) wrote:
> In article
> <e2af16b3-988c-4e80-b003-9c21efa27...@b15g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>, "Syd
I don't doubt it.
Get rich of the gullible.
Like you.

sbalneav

unread,
Oct 24, 2012, 5:28:32 PM10/24/12
to
There's a difference between watching an experiment performed in front of you,
and performing the experiment yourself. It is exactly the same difference as
watching a magic trick performed before you, and actually performing the magic
trick yourself.

> His result will be judged by the customers and scientists--not by the chatter.

Of this, I have no doubt whatsoever.

--
__ _ | Silence is safer than speech.
(_ |_) | -- Epictetus
__)|_) |

Jason

unread,
Oct 24, 2012, 5:41:55 PM10/24/12
to
In article
<32447797-8b80-49e2...@c20g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>, "Syd
M." <pauldav...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> On Oct 24, 10:50=A0am, harry k <turn...@q.com> wrote:
> > On Oct 23, 6:31=A0pm, Ja...@nospam.com (Jason) wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > In article <hlwdjsd2-F33552.18241923102...@news.giganews.com>, Jeanne
> >
> > > Douglas <hlwdj...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
> > > > In article
> > > > <Jason-2310121824030...@67-150-126-253.lsan.mdsg-pacwest.com>,
> > > > =A0Ja...@nospam.com (Jason) wrote:
> >
> > > > > In article <irbb2hb1a9lp$.1suy49rxa4tgt....@40tude.net>,
> > > > > ing...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
> >
> > > > > > On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 17:42:23 -0400, raven1 wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > If someone actually demonstrated cold fusion, I'd expect to see=
> the
> > > > > > > article published first in Nature, Science, or a physics journa=
> l, not
> > > > > > > a newsstand periodical. This sounds about as dubious as a cance=
> r cure
> > > > > > > that misses JAMA and Lancet, but gets published in Men's Health
> > > > > > > Magazine instead..
> >
> > > > > > If someone actually demonstrated cold fusion, it would make
> > > > > > we-interrupt-this-broadcast news around the world. =A0Stock marke=
> ts
> > > > > > would be shut as the shares of all major oil, transport, energy
> > > > > > and car companies would go absolutely haywire. =A0There wouldn't =
> be
> > > > > > a newspaper, radio station, TV or internet news service that
> > > > > > would not throw out everything else to cover this story. =A0It
> > > > > > might well cause chaos and unrest in the streets. =A0Basically, t=
> he
> > > > > > only way to not be aware of this would be if you were dead.
> >
> > > > > Popular Science can be purchased at any store that sells magazines.=
> Why
> > > > > not buy the November issue and read the article. It seems to be a e=
> asy
> > > > > experiment for most any scientist to do if he or she has access to =
> a lab.
> >
> > > > > The person that wrote the article saw the experiment being done and
> > > > > actually touched the narrow glass cylinder. He could feel the heat =
> coming
> > > > > off of it but it did not burn his fingers.
> >
> > > > > There was a small wire inside of the narrow glass cylinder. The con=
> stantan
> > > > > wire (nickel-copper allow) was roughed up. The glass cylinder was f=
> illed
> > > > > with hydrogen gas.
> >
> > > > > It's a very simple experiment that could easily be duplicated by mo=
> st any
> > > > > scientist that has a lab.
> >
> > > > Is this it?
> >
> > > > <http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2012-10/andrea-rossis-black-bo=
> x>
> >
> > > probably so--the title of the article in the Popular Science magazine i=
> s:
> >
> > > Andrea Rossi's Black Box by Steve Featherstone.
> >
> > So a "convicted scam artist" conducts a demonstration of a contraption
> > no one is
> > allowed to exam but runs on a "secret catalyst"...
> >
> > You're not gullible, you're downright stupid.
> >
> > Harry K
>
> If he had tried it with real scientists, he'd have been laughed off
> the stage.

Lots of scientists will be attending the LENR conference in Austin, Texas.


Jason

unread,
Oct 24, 2012, 5:45:45 PM10/24/12
to
In article
<3e921268-3124-4cb9...@z2g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>, "Syd
M." <pauldav...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> On Oct 24, 4:36=A0pm, Ja...@nospam.com (Jason) wrote:
> > In article
> > <e2af16b3-988c-4e80-b003-9c21efa27...@b15g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>, "Syd
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > M." <pauldavidwri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > On Oct 23, 10:29=3DA0pm, Jeanne Douglas <hlwdj...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrot=
> e:
> > > > In article
> > > > <Jason-2310121842470...@67-150-126-253.lsan.mdsg-pacwest.com>,
> >
> > > > =3DA0Ja...@nospam.com (Jason) wrote:
> > > > > In article <hlwdjsd2-F33552.18241923102...@news.giganews.com>, Jean=
> ne
> > > > > Douglas <hlwdj...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > In article
> > > > > > <Jason-2310121824030...@67-150-126-253.lsan.mdsg-pacwest.com>,
> > > > > > =3DA0Ja...@nospam.com (Jason) wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > In article <irbb2hb1a9lp$.1suy49rxa4tgt....@40tude.net>,
> > > > > > > ing...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 17:42:23 -0400, raven1 wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > > If someone actually demonstrated cold fusion, I'd expect to=
> see=3D
> > > =A0the
> > > > > > > > > article published first in Nature, Science, or a physics jo=
> urna=3D
> > > l, not
> > > > > > > > > a newsstand periodical. This sounds about as dubious as a c=
> ance=3D
> > > r cure
> > > > > > > > > that misses JAMA and Lancet, but gets published in Men's He=
> alth
> > > > > > > > > Magazine instead..
> >
> > > > > > > > If someone actually demonstrated cold fusion, it would make
> > > > > > > > we-interrupt-this-broadcast news around the world. =3DA0Stock=
> marke=3D
> > > ts
> > > > > > > > would be shut as the shares of all major oil, transport, ener=
> gy
> > > > > > > > and car companies would go absolutely haywire. =3DA0There wou=
> ldn't =3D
> > > be
> > > > > > > > a newspaper, radio station, TV or internet news service that
> > > > > > > > would not throw out everything else to cover this story. =3DA=
> 0It
> > > > > > > > might well cause chaos and unrest in the streets. =3DA0Basica=
> lly, t=3D
> > > he
> > > > > > > > only way to not be aware of this would be if you were dead.
> >
> > > > > > > Popular Science can be purchased at any store that sells magazi=
> nes.=3D
> > > =A0Why
> > > > > > > not buy the November issue and read the article. It seems to be=
> a e=3D
> > > asy
> > > > > > > experiment for most any scientist to do if he or she has access=
> to =3D
> > > a lab.
> >
> > > > > > > The person that wrote the article saw the experiment being done=
> and
> > > > > > > actually touched the narrow glass cylinder. He could feel the h=
> eat =3D
> > > coming
> > > > > > > off of it but it did not burn his fingers.
> >
> > > > > > > There was a small wire inside of the narrow glass cylinder. The=
> con=3D
> > > stantan
> > > > > > > wire (nickel-copper allow) was roughed up. The glass cylinder w=
> as f=3D
> > > illed
> > > > > > > with hydrogen gas.
> >
> > > > > > > It's a very simple experiment that could easily be duplicated b=
> y mo=3D
> > > st any
> > > > > > > scientist that has a lab.
> >
> > > > > > Is this it?
> >
> > > > > > <http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2012-10/andrea-rossis-blac=
> k-bo=3D
> > > x>
> >
> > > > > probably so--the title of the article in the Popular Science magazi=
> ne i=3D
> > > s:
> >
> > > > > Andrea Rossi's Black Box by Steve Featherstone.
> >
> > > > Which is the article I posted.
> >
> > > > How did you not notice that nobody was allowed to properly test the
> > > > mechanism?
> >
> > > A dead giveaway that it's all fake.
> >
> > I got the impression that Rossi is hoping to get rich and that is the
> > reason he will not open up that box to allow anyone to see what is inside
> > of it.
> >
> >
>
> I don't doubt it.
> Get rich of the gullible.
> Like you.

Don't worry--I will not be buying any black boxes.

As you may know, when people develop a new product, they keep the details
a secret until they get a patent on their new product.


Jason

unread,
Oct 24, 2012, 5:50:33 PM10/24/12
to
But Francesco Celani will provide the details of the experiment to any
scientist that wants to examine his details.

To use your example--it would be like the person performing the magic
trick performing the magic trick and later showing you how to easily
perform the same magic trick.


Syd Maniac

unread,
Oct 24, 2012, 5:55:33 PM10/24/12
to

Don Martin

unread,
Oct 24, 2012, 6:29:33 PM10/24/12
to
On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 07:50:20 -0700 (PDT), harry k <tur...@q.com>
wrote:

>> > <http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2012-10/andrea-rossis-black-box>
>>
>> probably so--the title of the article in the Popular Science magazine is:
>>
>> Andrea Rossi's Black Box by Steve Featherstone.
>
>So a "convicted scam artist" conducts a demonstration of a contraption
>no one is allowed to exam but runs on a "secret catalyst"...

Everyone _knows_ that a secret catalyst is the very best kind!

--

aa #2278 Never mind "proof." Where is your evidence?
BAAWA Chief Assistant to the Assistant Chief Heckler
Fidei defensor (Hon. Antipodean)
The Squeeky Wheel: http://home.comcast.net/~drdonmartin/

Jason

unread,
Oct 24, 2012, 7:23:22 PM10/24/12
to
In article <k69o4l$o9f$1...@news.albasani.net>, Syd Maniac
Once he gets the patent--the secret details can legally be revealed.


Jeanne Douglas

unread,
Oct 24, 2012, 7:14:06 PM10/24/12
to
> On 24 Oct, 02:16, Ja...@nospam.com (Jason) wrote:
> > In article <hlwdjsd2-30C185.13120423102...@news.giganews.com>, Jeanne
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Douglas <hlwdj...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
> > > In article <k66s1c$t2...@dont-email.me>, sbalneav <sbaln...@alburg.net>
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > > Jason <Ja...@nospam.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > Has Cold Fusion been proved?
> >
> > > > > A man named Francesco Celani has proved with a simple experiment that
> > > > > cold
> > > > > fusion does happen. The new name for Cold Fusion is LENR (Low Energy
> > > > > Nuclear Reaction).
> >
> > > > > You can learn all about the simple experiment and all about LENR in
> > > > > the
> > > > > latest issue of Popular Science magazine.
> >
> > > > > The story begins on page 62 of the November 2012 issue of Popular
> > Science.
> >
> > > > > Francesco Celani's simple experiment is discussed on page 97-98 of
> > > > > the
> > > > > above mentioned magazine.
> >
> > > > > You need to have access to a science lab to do the simple experiment.
> >
> > > > I look forward to a peer-reviewed paper in Nature or the like.
> >
> > > Me, too. Cold fusion would open up all kinds of possibilities.
> >
> > Why not buy the November 2012 issue of Popular Science and read about the
> > latest cold fussion experiments?
> >
> > If I lived near Austin, Texas--I would attend the cold fusion conference
> > that will take place at the facilities owned by NI (National Instuments).-
> > Hide quoted text -
> >
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> It is possible to get to Austin, Texas from just about any inhabited
> part of the world in about a day. If you think anything interesting
> will happen there why don't you go, and report back what you hear?

I just looked and there are flights from SLO to Austin every day on
United Express. They all make 2 stops, but there are no changes of plane.

Book it, Jason, and report back to us when you get home from the
conference (I'm assuming you don't have a laptop so we'd have to wait).

--
JD

"Osama Bin Laden is dead and GM is alive."--VP Joseph Biden

Jason

unread,
Oct 24, 2012, 7:28:16 PM10/24/12
to
In article <9jog885vci11dreph...@4ax.com>, Don Martin
Did you notice the article clearly stated that Andre Rossi was NOT invited
to the annual developers conference at the NI facilities located in
Austin, Texas?

The author of the article did not seem to like Andrea Rossi since he would
not let him see what was inside of his black box. The author also
criticized Andrew Rossi for keeping his black box plugged into an outlet
while he was showing off what his black box could do.


Jason

unread,
Oct 24, 2012, 7:36:20 PM10/24/12
to
In article <hlwdjsd2-301C84...@news.giganews.com>, Jeanne
I am not going to go. It's expensive.


Jeanne Douglas

unread,
Oct 24, 2012, 7:39:42 PM10/24/12
to
In article
<Jason-24101...@66-53-208-240.lsan.mdsg-pacwest.com>,
In other words, the author was telling you that the guy's a fraud and
you completely missed it.

It must be that reading comprehension problem again.

Dakota

unread,
Oct 24, 2012, 8:10:18 PM10/24/12
to
I encourage Jason to invest all of his savings in Rossi's project
before it's too late.

Dakota

unread,
Oct 24, 2012, 8:13:34 PM10/24/12
to
Don't do it, Jason. Why waste money on a flight when you could invest
it in Rossi's project and get rich beyond your wildest dreams?

Jason

unread,
Oct 24, 2012, 9:13:48 PM10/24/12
to
In article <hlwdjsd2-D07D62...@news.giganews.com>, Jeanne
I read the article and the author seemed to me to be saying that he did
not know if Andrea Rossi was or was not a fraud since he would not let him
or anyone else see what was inside his black box. I don't recall seeing
the word FRAUD in the entire article. The author did seem to believe it
was possible that Andrew Rossi was a fraud.


Jason

unread,
Oct 24, 2012, 9:17:36 PM10/24/12
to
I can't afford to fly to Austin, Texas and don't have any extra money to
invest in Rossi's project or even in my new hero Francesco Celani's
project. I have far more respect for Celani than I have for Adrea Rossi.
Rossi may be a fraud. He would not let the author see inside his black
box.


Seth lePod

unread,
Oct 24, 2012, 9:06:54 PM10/24/12
to
On Oct 24, 1:39 pm, Ja...@nospam.com (Jason) wrote:
> In article <hlwdjsd2-FFF780.23231423102...@news.giganews.com>, Jeanne
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Douglas <hlwdj...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
> > In article <Jason-2310122211210...@66.53.221.144>,
> >  Ja...@nospam.com (Jason) wrote:
>
> > > In article <k67im5$pd...@dont-email.me>, sbalneav
> <sbaln...@alburg.net> wrote:
>
> > > > Jason <Ja...@nospam.com> wrote:
> > > > > In article <k66s1c$t2...@dont-email.me>, sbalneav
Providing your data to others is an essential part of
the scientific process. And that exchange is worth
exactly as much as your trust in the honesty of the
other person -- anyone can simply make "data" up.


> It appears to me to be a very simple experiment that would be easy for a
> scientist to duplicate.

It also appears, from what you have written here,
that Celani is not about to reveal the details of his
experimental setup to anyone else. You can't replicate
someone else's work without having been told, in full
detail, exactly how they went about performing it.

Wait until he patents it first, you say.

I will make you a bet: Celani will not hand over the
details to scientists, and when they then ignore him
because there's nothing further they can do, Celani or
his accolytes will whine that there is a conspiracy
among established scientists to protect their
privileged turf by shutting him out.

I will make you a another bet: a year from now, not
only will Celani not have totally revolutionized the
world's energy systems, but his name will by then be
remembered only by a small handful of zealous
believers.

This may be a new thing to you, but I've seen too, too
many cheap-energy/free-energy nine-day-wonders come and
go. Zero-point energy, quantum vacuum energy,
motionless electromagnetic generators, water fuel cell
energy, magnetically-driven perpetual motion
generators, ultrasonically-induced cold fusion, even
energy based on the "half quantum number" of the ground
state of hydrogen (!!!)

In fact, here's a whole banquet of them for your
enjoyment (but why is no one interested?...)

http://www.cheniere.org/misc/oulist.htm


And I will predict something else -- when Celani's
"invention" doesn't work, his followers will proclaim
that the government and/or the current energy producers
have conspired to suppress his work.

Mind you, I myself would *love* to see it work out --
and for scientific reasons as well and economic and
environmental ones. But as I said, I've seen far too
many of these come and go.


Seth

Jason

unread,
Oct 24, 2012, 9:18:47 PM10/24/12
to
I don't have any extra money laying around. I owe about $5000.00 on my
credit card account.


Jason

unread,
Oct 24, 2012, 9:26:11 PM10/24/12
to
In article
<729bc004-85ca-49f2...@r6g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>, Seth
lePod <v.infe...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Oct 24, 1:39=A0pm, Ja...@nospam.com (Jason) wrote:
> > In article <hlwdjsd2-FFF780.23231423102...@news.giganews.com>, Jeanne
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Douglas <hlwdj...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
> > > In article <Jason-2310122211210...@66.53.221.144>,
> > > =A0Ja...@nospam.com (Jason) wrote:
> >
> > > > In article <k67im5$pd...@dont-email.me>, sbalneav
> > <sbaln...@alburg.net> wrote:
> >
> > > > > Jason <Ja...@nospam.com> wrote:
> > > > > > In article <k66s1c$t2...@dont-email.me>, sbalneav
> > > > <sbaln...@alburg.net> wrote:
> >
> > > > > >> Jason <Ja...@nospam.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > >> > Has Cold Fusion been proved?
> >
> > > > > >> > A man named Francesco Celani has proved with a simple experime=
> nt
> > > > that cold
> > > > > >> > fusion does happen. The new name for Cold Fusion is LENR (Low =
> Energy
> > > > > >> > Nuclear Reaction).
> >
> > > > > >> > You can learn all about the simple experiment and all about
> > LENR in the
> > > > > >> > latest issue of Popular Science magazine.
> >
> > > > > >> > The story begins on page 62 of the November 2012 issue of Popu=
> lar
> > > > Science.
> >
> > > > > >> > Francesco Celani's simple experiment is discussed on page 97-9=
> 8
> > of the
> > > > > >> > above mentioned magazine.
> >
> > > > > >> > You need to have access to a science lab to do the simple expe=
> riment.
> >
> > > > > >> I look forward to a peer-reviewed paper in Nature or the like.
> >
> > > > > > If you live near Austin, Texas--you can visit a company called Na=
> tural
> > > > > > Instruments and ask them about the special conference they will
> > have about
> > > > > > LINR. Francesco Celani will be there and will show off his experi=
> ment at
> > > > > > that conference. Why not read the article in Popular Science maga=
> zine?
> >
> > > > > Because any old shit gets into Popular Science. =A0I'm interested i=
> n
> > what real
> > > > > physicists have to say about it.
> >
> > > > Some real physicists will probably be attending the conference that w=
> ill
> > > > be taking place in Austin, Texas in the very near future. They will b=
> e
> > > > watching the cold fusion experiments being done in front of them.
> >
> > > That's completely meaningless, nothing better than a story in the bible=
Did you read the article that was in November 2012 issue of Popular Science?

The author clearly said that Francisco Celani showed him the written
details of his various experiments. The author said that Francisco Celani
will be performing his experiment in front of scientists that will be
attending the annual developers conference hosted by National Instrument
which will take place in the near future in Austin, Texas.


Smiler

unread,
Oct 24, 2012, 9:28:57 PM10/24/12
to
On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 18:29:33 -0400, Don Martin wrote:

> On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 07:50:20 -0700 (PDT), harry k <tur...@q.com> wrote:
>
>>> > <http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2012-10/andrea-rossis-black-box>
>>>
>>> probably so--the title of the article in the Popular Science magazine
>>> is:
>>>
>>> Andrea Rossi's Black Box by Steve Featherstone.
>>
>>So a "convicted scam artist" conducts a demonstration of a contraption no
>>one is allowed to exam but runs on a "secret catalyst"...
>
> Everyone _knows_ that a secret catalyst is the very best kind!

I've got loads of secret catalyst that I'm trying to get rid of, it's
cluttering up my yard. Maybe Jason would like to buy some, at $1200 per
lb...free shipping.

--
Smiler,

The godless one. a.a.# 2279

All gods are tailored to order. They're made to

exactly fit the prejudices of their believers.

Smiler

unread,
Oct 24, 2012, 9:31:30 PM10/24/12
to
On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 19:16:08 -0500, Dakota wrote:

> On 10/23/2012 4:42 PM, raven1 wrote:
>> On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 19:43:42 +0000 (UTC), sbalneav <sbal...@alburg.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Jason <Ja...@nospam.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Has Cold Fusion been proved?
>>>>
>>>> A man named Francesco Celani has proved with a simple experiment that
>>>> cold fusion does happen. The new name for Cold Fusion is LENR (Low
>>>> Energy Nuclear Reaction).
>>>>
>>>> You can learn all about the simple experiment and all about LENR in
>>>> the latest issue of Popular Science magazine.
>>>>
>>>> The story begins on page 62 of the November 2012 issue of Popular
>>>> Science.
>>>>
>>>> Francesco Celani's simple experiment is discussed on page 97-98 of the
>>>> above mentioned magazine.
>>>>
>>>> You need to have access to a science lab to do the simple experiment.
>>>
>>> I look forward to a peer-reviewed paper in Nature or the like.
>>
>> If someone actually demonstrated cold fusion, I'd expect to see the
>> article published first in Nature, Science, or a physics journal, not a
>> newsstand periodical. This sounds about as dubious as a cancer cure that
>> misses JAMA and Lancet, but gets published in Men's Health Magazine
>> instead..
>>
> Next to the ads for 'miracle cure' copper bracelets and homeopathic
> remedies.

And Chung's 2PD diet...

Seth lePod

unread,
Oct 24, 2012, 9:43:43 PM10/24/12
to
On Oct 24, 6:15 pm, Ja...@nospam.com (Jason) wrote:
> In article
> <729bc004-85ca-49f2-b93b-0bf91223a...@r6g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>, Seth
I admit I did not, as that is not one I subscribe to.

:
> The author clearly said that Francisco Celani showed him the written
> details of his various experiments.

And did Celani provide the entire details of his
apparatus? A description so exhaustive
that anyone reading it could reproduce the apparatus
without needing to know any further details?

> The author said that Francisco Celani
> will be performing his experiment in front of scientists that will be
> attending the annual developers conference hosted by National Instrument
> which will take place in the near future in Austin, Texas.

And James Randi can pull a sheep out of your back
pocket, and then hand you back your false teeth, in
front of thousands. "Performing the experiment" is
meaningless unless free and unfettered access to the
details of the equipment and materials used is provided.

Seth

Smiler

unread,
Oct 24, 2012, 9:44:04 PM10/24/12
to
On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 13:29:40 -0700, Jason wrote:

> In article <pan.2012.10.24....@somewhere.invalid>, MarkA
> <som...@somewhere.invalid> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 12:21:01 -0700, Jason wrote:
>>
>>
>> >
>> > Has Cold Fusion been proved?
>> >
>> > A man named Francesco Celani has proved with a simple experiment that
>> > cold fusion does happen. The new name for Cold Fusion is LENR (Low
>> > Energy Nuclear Reaction).
>> >
>> > You can learn all about the simple experiment and all about LENR in
>> > the latest issue of Popular Science magazine.
>> >
>> > The story begins on page 62 of the November 2012 issue of Popular
>> > Science.
>> >
>> > Francesco Celani's simple experiment is discussed on page 97-98 of the
>> > above mentioned magazine.
>> >
>> > You need to have access to a science lab to do the simple experiment.
>>
>> It sounds more like a break through in magazine marketing than a
>> discovery that will rock the foundations of particle physics. Pons and
>> Fleischmann announced the discovery of a method for producing cold
>> fusion in 1989. That's 23 years ago. In that time, nobody has been able
>> to reliably and consistently demonstrate that nuclear fusion is really
>> occurring. What they observed is considered by the physics community to
>> be most likely an interesting electro-chemical effect.
>>
>> Despite the lack of progress, or any plausible mechanism by which it
>> even *could* occur, a community of "cold-fusion true believers" has
>> sprung up, and continues to be "on the verge" of clearly demonstrating
>> that LENR is real.
>>
>> As I pointed out in another post, the hydrogen atom is the single most
>> intensively studied object in the world. It is exceedingly unlikely
>> that there are things it can do that have not yet been observed. That
>> doesn't mean that it's impossible, but if such properties were
>> discovered, I doubt if the pages of Popular Science would be the first
>> to publish it, nor would it be something you could produce with a simple
>> laboratory experiment.
>>
>> Fusion occurs when 2 hydrogen nuclei, i.e. protons, bind together to
>> form a helium nucleus. Since protons are positively charged, as you
>> push them together, the electrostatic charge wants to repel them from
>> each other. It takes a *tremendous* amount of energy to push them
>> together with enough force to overcome the electrostatic force, and get
>> them close enough for the strong nuclear force to take over, fusing them
>> into a single entity. Once that happens, and even greater tremendous
>> amount of energy is released. The scale of the energies involved is the
>> reason why nobody has, so far, been able to make fusion happen without
>> vaporizing everything within a radius of several kilometers.
>>
>> How much do you want to bet that Dr(?) Celani, and the folks at "Natural
>> Instruments", are still buying their electricity from the local power
>> utility?
>
> They are buying their electricity from the local power utility. That does
> not mean the LENR experiments mean nothing.
>
> I know someone that once had solar panels on the roof of their home and
> she told me they rarely paid any money to the local power utility. In
> fact, she said on some months the local power utility sent them a check
> instead of a bill.
>
> Perhaps in 20 years, most local power utility companies will be making use
> of LENR devices to produce electricity.

If it's so easy and cheap to produce, wouldn't every household have their
own LENR device, obviating the need for power companies and their bills?

David Canzi

unread,
Oct 24, 2012, 9:41:22 PM10/24/12
to
Jason <Ja...@nospam.com> wrote:
>In article
><0514afc1-b03d-4d5a...@v9g2000pbi.googlegroups.com>, harry
>k <tur...@q.com> wrote:
>
>> On Oct 23, 6:16=A0pm, Ja...@nospam.com (Jason) wrote:
>> > In article <hlwdjsd2-30C185.13120423102...@news.giganews.com>, Jeanne
>> >
>> > Douglas <hlwdj...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
>> > > In article <k66s1c$t2...@dont-email.me>, sbalneav <sbaln...@alburg.net>
>> > > wrote:
>> >
>> > > > Jason <Ja...@nospam.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > > > Has Cold Fusion been proved?
>> >
>> > > > > A man named Francesco Celani has proved with a simple experiment th=
>> at cold
>> > > > > fusion does happen. The new name for Cold Fusion is LENR (Low Energ=
>> y
>> > > > > Nuclear Reaction).
>> >
>> > > > > You can learn all about the simple experiment and all about LENR in=
>> the
>> > > > > latest issue of Popular Science magazine.
>> >
>> > > > > The story begins on page 62 of the November 2012 issue of Popular
>> > Science.
>> >
>> > > > > Francesco Celani's simple experiment is discussed on page 97-98 of =
>> the
>> > > > > above mentioned magazine.
>> >
>> > > > > You need to have access to a science lab to do the simple experimen=
>> t.
>> >
>> > > > I look forward to a peer-reviewed paper in Nature or the like.
>> >
>> > > Me, too. Cold fusion would open up all kinds of possibilities.
>> >
>> > Why not buy the November 2012 issue of Popular Science and read about the
>> > latest cold fussion experiments?
>> >
>> > If I lived near Austin, Texas--I would attend the cold fusion conference
>> > that will take place at the facilities owned by NI (National Instuments).
>>
>> Do you _really_ think such a discovery would be published first in
>> Popular Science?
>>
>> Gullible much are you?
>>
>> Harry K
>
>There will be articles in those types of magazines once scientists are
>able to easily duplicate the LENR experiments and LENR devices.
>
>That is the reason the conference in the NI facility in Austin, Texas is
>important. Lots of scientists will be at that conference.

The conference was in early August.

So, was Francesco Celani's demonstration important? National
Instruments doesn't seem to think so.

A Google search for Celani restricted to returning results only
from ni.com (National Instruments) gets only 3 hits. all are 5
years old and for a different Celani: Paolo, not Francesco.

--
David Canzi | "People talking in movie shows, people smoking in bed,
| people voting Republican, give them a boot to the head!"
| -- The Frantics

Syd Maniac

unread,
Oct 24, 2012, 10:13:31 PM10/24/12
to
How conveniant.

Syd Maniac

unread,
Oct 24, 2012, 10:15:28 PM10/24/12
to
How convenient.

sbalneav

unread,
Oct 24, 2012, 11:07:25 PM10/24/12
to
What's stopping him? Why isn't the paper out *now*?

> To use your example--it would be like the person performing the magic
> trick performing the magic trick and later showing you how to easily
> perform the same magic trick.

The person performing the magic trick does not need any time in between
performing the trick, and explaining how the trick works. What's delaying
Celani, hmmm?

--
__ _ | What is more important in a library than anything else
(_ |_) | - than everything else - is the fact that it exists.
__)|_) | -- Archibald MacLeish

Mike Painter

unread,
Oct 24, 2012, 11:10:53 PM10/24/12
to
On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 18:17:36 -0700, Ja...@nospam.com (Jason) wrote:

>
>I can't afford to fly to Austin, Texas and don't have any extra money to
>invest in Rossi's project or even in my new hero Francesco Celani's
>project. I have far more respect for Celani than I have for Adrea Rossi.
>Rossi may be a fraud. He would not let the author see inside his black
>box.


And your new hero has done essentially the same thing.
--
"When one person suffers from a delusion it is called insanity. When many people suffer from a delusion it is called religion." ~ Robert Pirsig

Mike Painter

unread,
Oct 24, 2012, 11:18:54 PM10/24/12
to
On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 13:30:35 -0700, Ja...@nospam.com (Jason) wrote:

>In article
><67420fb2-4dfd-4673...@k6g2000vbr.googlegroups.com>,
>"fur...@mail.croydon.ac.uk" <fur...@mail.croydon.ac.uk> wrote:
>
>> On 24 Oct, 02:16, Ja...@nospam.com (Jason) wrote:
>> > In article <hlwdjsd2-30C185.13120423102...@news.giganews.com>, Jeanne
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Douglas <hlwdj...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
>> > > In article <k66s1c$t2...@dont-email.me>, sbalneav <sbaln...@alburg.net>
>> > > wrote:
>> >
>> > > > Jason <Ja...@nospam.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > > > Has Cold Fusion been proved?
>> >
>> > > > > A man named Francesco Celani has proved with a simple experiment
>that cold
>> > > > > fusion does happen. The new name for Cold Fusion is LENR (Low Energy
>> > > > > Nuclear Reaction).
>> >
>> > > > > You can learn all about the simple experiment and all about LENR
>in the
>> > > > > latest issue of Popular Science magazine.
>> >

Nothing "proven", a black box presentation as is usual with scammers,
and moving straight to selling the product.

"Rossi--a lone Italian inventor with no real credentials and a history
as a convicted scam artist--has convinced a small army of researchers
that his box can harness a new type of nuclear reaction. What if
they're right? "

http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2012-10/andrea-rossis-black-box

Damn this is going to eat into my bridge and True Cross Fencing
Company

Mike Painter

unread,
Oct 24, 2012, 11:24:57 PM10/24/12
to
On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 18:29:33 -0400, Don Martin
<drdon...@comcast.net> wrote:

>On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 07:50:20 -0700 (PDT), harry k <tur...@q.com>
>wrote:
>
>>> > <http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2012-10/andrea-rossis-black-box>
>>>
>>> probably so--the title of the article in the Popular Science magazine is:
>>>
>>> Andrea Rossi's Black Box by Steve Featherstone.
>>
>>So a "convicted scam artist" conducts a demonstration of a contraption
>>no one is allowed to exam but runs on a "secret catalyst"...
>
>Everyone _knows_ that a secret catalyst is the very best kind!

I have a secret catalyst that I use on my over energy device.

But in testing I hooked the output to the input and naturally the
energy built until it disappeared, probably into another dimension.

I buried it, the secret catalyst, in a lake until mankind is ready for
it.
I put an X on the side of the boat so I could find it again.

harry k

unread,
Oct 25, 2012, 12:33:29 AM10/25/12
to
On Oct 24, 4:25 pm, Ja...@nospam.com (Jason) wrote:
> In article <hlwdjsd2-301C84.16140524102...@news.giganews.com>, Jeanne
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Douglas <hlwdj...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
> > In article
> > <67420fb2-4dfd-4673-9b6c-a914e0b14...@k6g2000vbr.googlegroups.com>,
You misspelled "I might learn something".

Harry K

harry k

unread,
Oct 25, 2012, 12:36:29 AM10/25/12
to
On Oct 24, 1:25 pm, Ja...@nospam.com (Jason) wrote:
> In article
> <0514afc1-b03d-4d5a-b520-523058e7a...@v9g2000pbi.googlegroups.com>, harry
>
>
>
>
>
> k <turn...@q.com> wrote:
> > On Oct 23, 6:16=A0pm, Ja...@nospam.com (Jason) wrote:
> > > In article <hlwdjsd2-30C185.13120423102...@news.giganews.com>, Jeanne
>
> > > Douglas <hlwdj...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
> > > > In article <k66s1c$t2...@dont-email.me>, sbalneav <sbaln...@alburg.net>
> > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > Jason <Ja...@nospam.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > Has Cold Fusion been proved?
>
> > > > > > A man named Francesco Celani has proved with a simple experiment th=
> > at cold
> > > > > > fusion does happen. The new name for Cold Fusion is LENR (Low Energ=
> > y
> > > > > > Nuclear Reaction).
>
> > > > > > You can learn all about the simple experiment and all about LENR in=
> >  the
> > > > > > latest issue of Popular Science magazine.
>
> > > > > > The story begins on page 62 of the November 2012 issue of Popular
> > > Science.
>
> > > > > > Francesco Celani's simple experiment is discussed on page 97-98 of =
> > the
> > > > > > above mentioned magazine.
>
> > > > > > You need to have access to a science lab to do the simple experimen=
> > t.
>
> > > > > I look forward to a peer-reviewed paper in Nature or the like.
>
> > > > Me, too. Cold fusion would open up all kinds of possibilities.
>
> > > Why not buy the November 2012 issue of Popular Science and read about the
> > > latest cold fussion experiments?
>
> > > If I lived near Austin, Texas--I would attend the cold fusion conference
> > > that will take place at the facilities owned by NI (National Instuments).
>
> > Do you _really_ think such a discovery would be published first in
> > Popular Science?
>
> > Gullible much are you?
>
> > Harry K
>
> There will be articles in those types of magazines once scientists are
> able to easily duplicate the LENR experiments and LENR devices.
>
> That is the reason the conference in the NI facility in Austin, Texas is
> important. Lots of scientists will be at that conference.

Since the process depends on a "secret catalysst" and they won't say
what it is, just how do y0ou think others are going to be able to do
the experiment.

I already said it and you just confirmed it. You _are_ stupid.

Harry K

David Canzi

unread,
Oct 25, 2012, 12:30:36 AM10/25/12
to
Jason <Ja...@nospam.com> wrote:
>
>
>Has Cold Fusion been proved?
>
>A man named Francesco Celani has proved with a simple experiment that cold
>fusion does happen. The new name for Cold Fusion is LENR (Low Energy
>Nuclear Reaction).
>
>You can learn all about the simple experiment and all about LENR in the
>latest issue of Popular Science magazine.
>
>The story begins on page 62 of the November 2012 issue of Popular Science.
>
>Francesco Celani's simple experiment is discussed on page 97-98 of the
>above mentioned magazine.
>
>You need to have access to a science lab to do the simple experiment.

Celani warned the writer not to touch the tube because it was hot.
When the writer brought his hand near the tube he could feel heat.

There is a wire coil inside the tube, mentioned in the Popular
Science article, and visible in this video of Dr. Celani's
apparatus:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HN4VK82Mngc

Do a Google Image search for "travelling wave tube" and compare
the images and diagrams of travelling wave tubes (TWTs) with
Dr. Celani's apparatus. Many of the photographs show TWTs in
opaque enclosures, but in some you can see the glass and the
coil within.

Check out the diagram of a TWT on this page:

http://www.microwave-museum.org/exhibits/mwm0034.htm

Notice what TWTs are used for: amplifying microwaves. If any
microwaves leak out of the sides of the tube, it can make your
hand feel hot when you bring it near the tube...

I'll wait until some reputable organization investigates
Dr. Celani's apparatus and/or duplicates his claimed results.

harry k

unread,
Oct 25, 2012, 12:40:22 AM10/25/12
to
On Oct 24, 2:04 pm, "Syd M." <pauldavidwri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Oct 24, 10:50 am, harry k <turn...@q.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Oct 23, 6:31 pm, Ja...@nospam.com (Jason) wrote:
>
> > > In article <hlwdjsd2-F33552.18241923102...@news.giganews.com>, Jeanne
>
> > > Douglas <hlwdj...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
> > > > In article
> > > > <Jason-2310121824030...@67-150-126-253.lsan.mdsg-pacwest.com>,
> > > >  Ja...@nospam.com (Jason) wrote:
>
> > > > > In article <irbb2hb1a9lp$.1suy49rxa4tgt....@40tude.net>,
> > > > > ing...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
>
> > > > > > On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 17:42:23 -0400, raven1 wrote:
>
> > > > > > > If someone actually demonstrated cold fusion, I'd expect to see the
> > > > > > > article published first in Nature, Science, or a physics journal, not
> > > > > > > a newsstand periodical. This sounds about as dubious as a cancer cure
> > > > > > > that misses JAMA and Lancet, but gets published in Men's Health
> > > > > > > Magazine instead..
>
> > > > > > If someone actually demonstrated cold fusion, it would make
> > > > > > we-interrupt-this-broadcast news around the world.  Stock markets
> > > > > > would be shut as the shares of all major oil, transport, energy
> > > > > > and car companies would go absolutely haywire.  There wouldn't be
> > > > > > a newspaper, radio station, TV or internet news service that
> > > > > > would not throw out everything else to cover this story.  It
> > > > > > might well cause chaos and unrest in the streets.  Basically, the
> > > > > > only way to not be aware of this would be if you were dead.
>
> > > > > Popular Science can be purchased at any store that sells magazines. Why
> > > > > not buy the November issue and read the article. It seems to be a easy
> > > > > experiment for most any scientist to do if he or she has access to a lab.
>
> > > > > The person that wrote the article saw the experiment being done and
> > > > > actually touched the narrow glass cylinder. He could feel the heat coming
> > > > > off of it but it did not burn his fingers.
>
> > > > > There was a small wire inside of the narrow glass cylinder. The constantan
> > > > > wire (nickel-copper allow) was roughed up. The glass cylinder was filled
> > > > > with hydrogen gas.
>
> > > > > It's a very simple experiment that could easily be duplicated by most any
> > > > > scientist that has a lab.
>
> > > > Is this it?
>
> > > > <http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2012-10/andrea-rossis-black-box>
>
> > > probably so--the title of the article in the Popular Science magazine is:
>
> > > Andrea Rossi's Black Box by Steve Featherstone.
>
> > So a "convicted scam artist" conducts a demonstration of a contraption
> > no one is
> > allowed to exam but runs on a "secret catalyst"...
>
> > You're not gullible, you're downright stupid.
>
> > Harry K
>
> If he had tried it with real scientists, he'd have been laughed off
> the stage.

I wonder what his response wouild have been if asked to unplug the
machine from the mains. Since it "produced more energy than it
consumed, there would be no need to be plugged in once started."

Harry K

harry k

unread,
Oct 25, 2012, 12:44:29 AM10/25/12
to
On Oct 24, 6:02 pm, Ja...@nospam.com (Jason) wrote:
> In article <hlwdjsd2-D07D62.16394224102...@news.giganews.com>, Jeanne
>
> Douglas <hlwdj...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
> > In article
> > <Jason-2410121628170...@66-53-208-240.lsan.mdsg-pacwest.com>,
> >  Ja...@nospam.com (Jason) wrote:
>
> > > In article <9jog885vci11drephbmatgrlcbvn6k6...@4ax.com>, Don Martin
> > > <drdonmar...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> > > > On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 07:50:20 -0700 (PDT), harry k <turn...@q.com>
There are clues laced all through the acticle starting with the
introduction that it _IS_ a fraud. Intelligent people worldwide
drecognize that by just skimming the article.

Kinda leaves you out though.

Harry K

harry k

unread,
Oct 25, 2012, 12:48:34 AM10/25/12
to
On Oct 24, 1:30 pm, Ja...@nospam.com (Jason) wrote:
> In article <k691eb$7u...@dont-email.me>, sbalneav <sbaln...@alburg.net> wrote:
> > Jason <Ja...@nospam.com> wrote:
> > > In article <k67is9$pd...@dont-email.me>, sbalneav
> <sbaln...@alburg.net> wrote:
>
> > >> raven1 <quoththera...@nevermore.com> wrote:
> > >> > On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 19:43:42 +0000 (UTC), sbalneav
> > >> > <sbaln...@alburg.net> wrote:
>
> > >> >>Jason <Ja...@nospam.com> wrote:
>
> > >> >>> Has Cold Fusion been proved?
>
> > >> >>> A man named Francesco Celani has proved with a simple experiment
> that cold
> > >> >>> fusion does happen. The new name for Cold Fusion is LENR (Low Energy
> > >> >>> Nuclear Reaction).
>
> > >> >>> You can learn all about the simple experiment and all about LENR in the
> > >> >>> latest issue of Popular Science magazine.
>
> > >> >>> The story begins on page 62 of the November 2012 issue of Popular
> > > Science.
>
> > >> >>> Francesco Celani's simple experiment is discussed on page 97-98 of the
> > >> >>> above mentioned magazine.
>
> > >> >>> You need to have access to a science lab to do the simple experiment.
>
> > >> >>I look forward to a peer-reviewed paper in Nature or the like.
>
> > >> > If someone actually demonstrated cold fusion, I'd expect to see the
> > >> > article published first in Nature, Science, or a physics journal, not
> > >> > a newsstand periodical. This sounds about as dubious as a cancer cure
> > >> > that misses JAMA and Lancet, but gets published in Men's Health
> > >> > Magazine instead..
>
> His result will be judged by the customers and scientists--not by the chatter.

Tell us just how they are going to be able to judge the demonstration
or "perform
the simple experiment" when they are not allowed to examine the
device.

Harry K

Jason

unread,
Oct 25, 2012, 1:35:59 AM10/25/12
to
In article <pan.2012.10.25....@JoeKing.com>, Smiler
<Youm...@JoeKing.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 18:29:33 -0400, Don Martin wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 07:50:20 -0700 (PDT), harry k <tur...@q.com> wrote:
> >
> >>> > <http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2012-10/andrea-rossis-black-box>
> >>>
> >>> probably so--the title of the article in the Popular Science magazine
> >>> is:
> >>>
> >>> Andrea Rossi's Black Box by Steve Featherstone.
> >>
> >>So a "convicted scam artist" conducts a demonstration of a contraption no
> >>one is allowed to exam but runs on a "secret catalyst"...
> >
> > Everyone _knows_ that a secret catalyst is the very best kind!
>
> I've got loads of secret catalyst that I'm trying to get rid of, it's
> cluttering up my yard. Maybe Jason would like to buy some, at $1200 per
> lb...free shipping.

Put them in a place were the sun does not shine.


Jason

unread,
Oct 25, 2012, 1:40:57 AM10/25/12
to
In article
<a427181f-72fe-47d8...@6g2000pbh.googlegroups.com>, harry k
<tur...@q.com> wrote:

> On Oct 24, 6:02=A0pm, Ja...@nospam.com (Jason) wrote:
> > In article <hlwdjsd2-D07D62.16394224102...@news.giganews.com>, Jeanne
> >
> > Douglas <hlwdj...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
> > > In article
> > > <Jason-2410121628170...@66-53-208-240.lsan.mdsg-pacwest.com>,
> > > =A0Ja...@nospam.com (Jason) wrote:
> >
> > > > In article <9jog885vci11drephbmatgrlcbvn6k6...@4ax.com>, Don Martin
> > > > <drdonmar...@comcast.net> wrote:
> >
> > > > > On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 07:50:20 -0700 (PDT), harry k <turn...@q.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> >
> > <http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2012-10/andrea-rossis-black-box>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > > > >> probably so--the title of the article in the Popular Science
> > magazine is:
> >
> > > > > >> Andrea Rossi's Black Box by Steve Featherstone.
> >
> > > > > >So a "convicted scam artist" conducts a demonstration of a contrap=
> tion
> > > > > >no one is allowed to exam but runs on a "secret catalyst"...
> >
> > > > > Everyone _knows_ that a secret catalyst is the very best kind!
> >
> > > > > --
> >
> > > > > aa #2278 Never mind "proof." Where is your evidence?
> > > > > BAAWA Chief Assistant to the Assistant Chief Heckler
> > > > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Fidei defensor (Hon. Antipodean)
> > > > > The Squeeky Wheel: =A0http://home.comcast.net/~drdonmartin/
> >
> > > > Did you notice the article clearly stated that Andre Rossi was NOT in=
> vited
> > > > to the annual developers conference at the NI facilities located in
> > > > Austin, Texas?
> >
> > > > The author of the article did not seem to like Andrea Rossi since he =
> would
> > > > not let him see what was inside of his black box. The author also
> > > > criticized Andrew Rossi for keeping his black box plugged into an out=
> let
> > > > while he was showing off what his black box could do.
> >
> > > In other words, the author was telling you that the guy's a fraud and
> > > you completely missed it.
> >
> > > It must be that reading comprehension problem again.
> >
> > I read the article and the author seemed to me to be saying that he did
> > not know if Andrea Rossi was or was not a fraud since he would not let hi=
> m
> > or anyone else see what was inside his black box. I don't recall seeing
> > the word FRAUD in the entire article. The author did seem to believe it
> > was possible that Andrew Rossi was a fraud.
>
> There are clues laced all through the acticle starting with the
> introduction that it _IS_ a fraud. Intelligent people worldwide
> drecognize that by just skimming the article.
>
> Kinda leaves you out though.
>
> Harry K

Read my last sentence which is still above---The author did seem to

Jason

unread,
Oct 25, 2012, 1:47:35 AM10/25/12
to
In article <k6af9c$adm$1...@rumours.uwaterloo.ca>, "David Canzi"
You may not have to wait very long. Lots of scientists will be attending
the annual developers conference hosted by National Instruments which is
located in Austin, Texas.


Jason

unread,
Oct 25, 2012, 1:51:24 AM10/25/12
to
The author of the article said that Celani showed him the written details
of his various experiments. It's my guess that he will do the same thing
at the conference in Austin, Texas. He will probably let any of the
scientists that attend the conference read the details of his experiments.


Jason

unread,
Oct 25, 2012, 2:02:02 AM10/25/12
to
In article
<5c3ccb57-bce1-4088...@6g2000pbh.googlegroups.com>, harry k
<tur...@q.com> wrote:

> On Oct 24, 1:30=A0pm, Ja...@nospam.com (Jason) wrote:
> > In article <k691eb$7u...@dont-email.me>, sbalneav <sbaln...@alburg.net> w=
> rote:
> > > Jason <Ja...@nospam.com> wrote:
> > > > In article <k67is9$pd...@dont-email.me>, sbalneav
> > <sbaln...@alburg.net> wrote:
> >
> > > >> raven1 <quoththera...@nevermore.com> wrote:
> > > >> > On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 19:43:42 +0000 (UTC), sbalneav
> > > >> > <sbaln...@alburg.net> wrote:
> >
> > > >> >>Jason <Ja...@nospam.com> wrote:
> >
> > > >> >>> Has Cold Fusion been proved?
> >
> > > >> >>> A man named Francesco Celani has proved with a simple experiment
> > that cold
> > > >> >>> fusion does happen. The new name for Cold Fusion is LENR (Low En=
> ergy
> > > >> >>> Nuclear Reaction).
> >
> > > >> >>> You can learn all about the simple experiment and all about LENR=
> in the
> > > >> >>> latest issue of Popular Science magazine.
> >
> > > >> >>> The story begins on page 62 of the November 2012 issue of Popula=
> r
> > > > Science.
> >
> > > >> >>> Francesco Celani's simple experiment is discussed on page 97-98 =
> of the
> > > >> >>> above mentioned magazine.
> >
> > > >> >>> You need to have access to a science lab to do the simple experi=
> ment.
> >
> > > >> >>I look forward to a peer-reviewed paper in Nature or the like.
> >
> > > >> > If someone actually demonstrated cold fusion, I'd expect to see th=
> e
> > > >> > article published first in Nature, Science, or a physics journal, =
> not
> > > >> > a newsstand periodical. This sounds about as dubious as a cancer c=
> ure
> > > >> > that misses JAMA and Lancet, but gets published in Men's Health
> > > >> > Magazine instead..
> >
> > > >> That's my point. =A0Hence my reference to Nature :) =A0I won't say i=
> t doesn't
> > > >> exist, but I'd like actual scientists to review it.
> >
> > > >http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2012-10/andrea-rossis-black-box
> >
> > > From the article:
> >
> > > "Rossi isn???t the best ambassador for a field with credibility
> > problems, though.
> > > In the ???80s, he invented a machine that magically transformed
> > household garbage
> > > and industrial waste into oil???only it didn???t create a drop. Leaky
> > storage tanks
> > > at Rossi???s ???poison factory,??? as one Italian newspaper called it,
> > contained
> > > 77,000 tons of toxic sludge that cost $50 million to clean up. While un=
> der
> > > investigation for environmental crimes, Rossi was also charged with gol=
> d
> > > trafficking; he went to jail for six months and was later acquitted. As=
> it
> > > happens, his engineering degree is from Kensington University, a notori=
> ous
> > > diploma mill shut down in 1996 by the state of California."
> >
> > > "When I got off the plane in Italy, the weather was brutally hot.
> > Driving to my
> > > hotel, air-conditioning cranked up, I thought about the carbon my car w=
> as
> > > pumping into the atmosphere, my small contribution to a repeat of the P=
> ermian
> > > extinction that Dennis Bushnell warned about. When I got to my hotel, I=
> fired
> > > up my laptop and checked my e-mail. There was a terse message from Ross=
> i
> > > canceling our interview. No explanation. Given what I???d heard about
> > Rossi???s
> > > capricious temper, I suspected something like this might happen, but no=
> t
> > before
> > > I???d unpacked my suitcase. I dashed off a bewildered reply and got a r=
> esponse
> > > within the hour:
> >
> > > I REPEAT THAT I WILL NOT RELEASE ANY INTERVIEW. I HAVE TO WORK AND I HA=
> VE NOT
> > > TIME AT ALL TO POLEMIZE WITH ENEMIES, COMPETITORS, ETC. THE RESULTS OF =
> MY WORK
> > > WILL BE JUDGED BY THE CUSTOMERS, NOT BY THE CHATTERS."
> >
> > > I smell con. =A0That's not the way real science works. =A0You don't hid=
> e your
> > > discoveries in real scientific work.
> >
> > His simple experiment can easily be duplicated by scientists that have
> > access to a lab. If they attend the conference in Austin, Texas--they can
> > watch Francisco Celani perform the simple experiment in front of them.
> >
> > His result will be judged by the customers and scientists--not by the cha=
> tter.
>
> Tell us just how they are going to be able to judge the demonstration
> or "perform
> the simple experiment" when they are not allowed to examine the
> device.
>
> Harry K

They can examine the device when Celini performs the experiment. All they
will see is a glass cylinder with constantan wire running thu it. The
glass cylinder is loaded with hydrogen before it is sealed up to keep the
hydrogen gas from escaping. The author felt the glass cylinder and it was
warm--indicating that it was producing energy. Celini admitted that he had
to rough up the wire so that the wire so that the wire would be more like
a sponge--and therefore more easily absorb the hydrogen gas.

It reminded me of a light bulb.


Jason

unread,
Oct 25, 2012, 2:12:40 AM10/25/12
to
In article <k6a5c2$grm$1...@rumours.uwaterloo.ca>, "David Canzi"
The article about this subject was in the NOV 2012 issue of Popular
Science. It clearly said on page 98 that it was an annual developer's
conference. Did the article that you mentioned above say that it was a
developer's conference or some other type of conference?


Jason

unread,
Oct 25, 2012, 2:20:12 AM10/25/12
to
In article
<fb975bcc-699a-4335...@vy11g2000pbb.googlegroups.com>,
harry k <tur...@q.com> wrote:

> On Oct 24, 1:25=A0pm, Ja...@nospam.com (Jason) wrote:
> > In article
> > <0514afc1-b03d-4d5a-b520-523058e7a...@v9g2000pbi.googlegroups.com>, harry
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > k <turn...@q.com> wrote:
> > > On Oct 23, 6:16=3DA0pm, Ja...@nospam.com (Jason) wrote:
> > > > In article <hlwdjsd2-30C185.13120423102...@news.giganews.com>, Jeanne
> >
> > > > Douglas <hlwdj...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > In article <k66s1c$t2...@dont-email.me>, sbalneav <sbaln...@alburg.=
> net>
> > > > > wrote:
> >
> > > > > > Jason <Ja...@nospam.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > Has Cold Fusion been proved?
> >
> > > > > > > A man named Francesco Celani has proved with a simple experimen=
> t th=3D
> > > at cold
> > > > > > > fusion does happen. The new name for Cold Fusion is LENR (Low E=
> nerg=3D
> > > y
> > > > > > > Nuclear Reaction).
> >
> > > > > > > You can learn all about the simple experiment and all about LEN=
> R in=3D
> > > =A0the
> > > > > > > latest issue of Popular Science magazine.
> >
> > > > > > > The story begins on page 62 of the November 2012 issue of Popul=
> ar
> > > > Science.
> >
> > > > > > > Francesco Celani's simple experiment is discussed on page 97-98=
> of =3D
> > > the
> > > > > > > above mentioned magazine.
> >
> > > > > > > You need to have access to a science lab to do the simple exper=
> imen=3D
> > > t.
> >
> > > > > > I look forward to a peer-reviewed paper in Nature or the like.
> >
> > > > > Me, too. Cold fusion would open up all kinds of possibilities.
> >
> > > > Why not buy the November 2012 issue of Popular Science and read about=
> the
> > > > latest cold fussion experiments?
> >
> > > > If I lived near Austin, Texas--I would attend the cold fusion confere=
> nce
> > > > that will take place at the facilities owned by NI (National Instumen=
> ts).
> >
> > > Do you _really_ think such a discovery would be published first in
> > > Popular Science?
> >
> > > Gullible much are you?
> >
> > > Harry K
> >
> > There will be articles in those types of magazines once scientists are
> > able to easily duplicate the LENR experiments and LENR devices.
> >
> > That is the reason the conference in the NI facility in Austin, Texas is
> > important. Lots of scientists will be at that conference.
>
> Since the process depends on a "secret catalysst" and they won't say
> what it is, just how do y0ou think others are going to be able to do
> the experiment.
>
> I already said it and you just confirmed it. You _are_ stupid.
>
> Harry K

The article only mentioned a narrow glass cylinder filled with hydrogen
gas. The constantan wire inside the glass cylinder is made out of a
nickel-copper alloy. The constantan wire is roughed up . The glass
cylinder is sealed to keep the hydrogen gas from leaking out of it.

It reminded me of a electric light bulb.


Jason

unread,
Oct 25, 2012, 2:21:59 AM10/25/12
to
In article
<14308081-7bb0-4284...@i7g2000pbf.googlegroups.com>, harry
k <tur...@q.com> wrote:

> On Oct 24, 4:25=A0pm, Ja...@nospam.com (Jason) wrote:
> > In article <hlwdjsd2-301C84.16140524102...@news.giganews.com>, Jeanne
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Douglas <hlwdj...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
> > > In article
> > > <67420fb2-4dfd-4673-9b6c-a914e0b14...@k6g2000vbr.googlegroups.com>,
> > > =A0"fur...@mail.croydon.ac.uk" <fur...@mail.croydon.ac.uk> wrote:
> >
> > > > On 24 Oct, 02:16, Ja...@nospam.com (Jason) wrote:
> > > > > In article <hlwdjsd2-30C185.13120423102...@news.giganews.com>, Jean=
> ne
> >
> > > > > Douglas <hlwdj...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > In article <k66s1c$t2...@dont-email.me>, sbalneav <sbaln...@albur=
> g.net>
> > > > > > wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > Jason <Ja...@nospam.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > Has Cold Fusion been proved?
> >
> > > > > > > > A man named Francesco Celani has proved with a simple
> > experiment that
> > > > > > > > cold
> > > > > > > > fusion does happen. The new name for Cold Fusion is LENR (Low=
> Energy
> > > > > > > > Nuclear Reaction).
> >
> > > > > > > > You can learn all about the simple experiment and all about L=
> ENR in
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > latest issue of Popular Science magazine.
> >
> > > > > > > > The story begins on page 62 of the November 2012 issue of Pop=
> ular
> > > > > Science.
> >
> > > > > > > > Francesco Celani's simple experiment is discussed on page 97-=
> 98 of
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > above mentioned magazine.
> >
> > > > > > > > You need to have access to a science lab to do the simple
> > experiment.
> >
> > > > > > > I look forward to a peer-reviewed paper in Nature or the like.
> >
> > > > > > Me, too. Cold fusion would open up all kinds of possibilities.
> >
> > > > > Why not buy the November 2012 issue of Popular Science and read abo=
> ut the
> > > > > latest cold fussion experiments?
> >
> > > > > If I lived near Austin, Texas--I would attend the cold fusion confe=
> rence
> > > > > that will take place at the facilities owned by NI (National
> > Instuments).-
> > > > > Hide quoted text -
> >
> > > > > - Show quoted text -
> >
> > > > It is possible to get to Austin, Texas from just about any inhabited
> > > > part of the world in about a day. =A0If you think anything interestin=
> g
> > > > will happen there why don't you go, and report back what you hear?
> >
> > > I just looked and there are flights from SLO to Austin every day on
> > > United Express. They all make 2 stops, but there are no changes of plan=
> e.
> >
> > > Book it, Jason, and report back to us when you get home from the
> > > conference (I'm assuming you don't have a laptop so we'd have to wait).
> >
> > I am not going to go. It's expensive.
>
> You misspelled "I might learn something".
>
> Harry K

One other poster told me that the conference took place in August.


Jason

unread,
Oct 25, 2012, 2:23:39 AM10/25/12
to
In article <jcbh88tb68slvpsa8...@4ax.com>, Mike Painter
The details of his experiment were discussed in the article.


Jason

unread,
Oct 25, 2012, 2:25:34 AM10/25/12
to
In article <pan.2012.10.25....@JoeKing.com>, Smiler
<Youm...@JoeKing.com> wrote:

Perhaps--they are already doing it with the use of solar panels.

It depends on how large and how expensive they will be.

If they are very small--you are 100% correct.


Jason

unread,
Oct 25, 2012, 2:35:22 AM10/25/12
to
In article
<63e94bca-119f-4fee...@s18g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>, Seth
lePod <v.infe...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Oct 24, 6:15=A0pm, Ja...@nospam.com (Jason) wrote:
> > In article
> > <729bc004-85ca-49f2-b93b-0bf91223a...@r6g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>, Seth
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > lePod <v.inferna...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Oct 24, 1:39=3DA0pm, Ja...@nospam.com (Jason) wrote:
> > > > In article <hlwdjsd2-FFF780.23231423102...@news.giganews.com>, Jeanne
> >
> > > > Douglas <hlwdj...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > In article <Jason-2310122211210...@66.53.221.144>,
> > > > > =3DA0Ja...@nospam.com (Jason) wrote:
> >
> > > > > > In article <k67im5$pd...@dont-email.me>, sbalneav
> > > > <sbaln...@alburg.net> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > Jason <Ja...@nospam.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > In article <k66s1c$t2...@dont-email.me>, sbalneav
> > > > > > <sbaln...@alburg.net> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > >> Jason <Ja...@nospam.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > >> > Has Cold Fusion been proved?
> >
> > > > > > > >> > A man named Francesco Celani has proved with a simple expe=
> rime=3D
> > > nt
> > > > > > that cold
> > > > > > > >> > fusion does happen. The new name for Cold Fusion is LENR (=
> Low =3D
> > > Energy
> > > > > > > >> > Nuclear Reaction).
> >
> > > > > > > >> > You can learn all about the simple experiment and all abou=
> t
> > > > LENR in the
> > > > > > > >> > latest issue of Popular Science magazine.
> >
> > > > > > > >> > The story begins on page 62 of the November 2012 issue of =
> Popu=3D
> > > lar
> > > > > > Science.
> >
> > > > > > > >> > Francesco Celani's simple experiment is discussed on page =
> 97-9=3D
> > > 8
> > > > of the
> > > > > > > >> > above mentioned magazine.
> >
> > > > > > > >> > You need to have access to a science lab to do the simple =
> expe=3D
> > > riment.
> >
> > > > > > > >> I look forward to a peer-reviewed paper in Nature or the lik=
> e.
> >
> > > > > > > > If you live near Austin, Texas--you can visit a company calle=
> d Na=3D
> > > tural
> > > > > > > > Instruments and ask them about the special conference they wi=
> ll
> > > > have about
> > > > > > > > LINR. Francesco Celani will be there and will show off his ex=
> peri=3D
> > > ment at
> > > > > > > > that conference. Why not read the article in Popular Science =
> maga=3D
> > > zine?
> >
> > > > > > > Because any old shit gets into Popular Science. =3DA0I'm intere=
> sted i=3D
> > > n
> > > > what real
> > > > > > > physicists have to say about it.
> >
> > > > > > Some real physicists will probably be attending the conference th=
> at w=3D
> > > ill
> > > > > > be taking place in Austin, Texas in the very near future. They wi=
> ll b=3D
> > > e
> > > > > > watching the cold fusion experiments being done in front of them.
> >
> > > > > That's completely meaningless, nothing better than a story in the b=
> ible=3D
> > > .
> >
> > > :
> > > > > The ONLY thing that matters is the data and being able to replicate=
> the
> > > > > results.
> >
> > > :
> > > > You are correct. Francisco Celani was willing to show his data to the
> > > > author of the article and anyone else that wants to see his data. He =
> will
> > > > be at the conference and will do the experiment in front of the peopl=
> e
> > > > that will be attending the conference.
> >
> > > Providing your data to others is an essential part of
> > > the scientific process. =A0And that exchange is worth
> > > exactly as much as your trust in the honesty of the
> > > other person -- anyone can simply make "data" up.
> >
> > > > It appears to me to be a very simple experiment that would be easy fo=
> r a
> > > > scientist to duplicate.
> >
> > > It also appears, from what you have written here,
> > > that Celani is not about to reveal the details of his
> > > experimental setup to anyone else. =A0You can't replicate
> > > someone else's work without having been told, in full
> > > detail, exactly how they went about performing it.
> >
> > > Wait until he patents it first, you say.
> >
> > > I will make you a bet: Celani will not hand over the
> > > details to scientists, and when they then ignore him
> > > because there's nothing further they can do, Celani or
> > > his accolytes will whine that there is a conspiracy
> > > among established scientists to protect their
> > > privileged turf by shutting him out.
> >
> > > I will make you a another bet: a year from now, not
> > > only will Celani not have totally revolutionized the
> > > world's energy systems, but his name will by then be
> > > remembered only by a small handful of zealous
> > > believers.
> >
> > > This may be a new thing to you, but I've seen too, too
> > > many cheap-energy/free-energy nine-day-wonders come and
> > > go. =A0Zero-point energy, quantum vacuum energy,
> > > motionless electromagnetic generators, water fuel cell
> > > energy, magnetically-driven perpetual motion
> > > generators, ultrasonically-induced cold fusion, even
> > > energy based on the "half quantum number" of the ground
> > > state of hydrogen (!!!)
> >
> > > In fact, here's a whole banquet of them for your
> > > enjoyment (but why is no one interested?...)
> >
> > > =A0 =A0http://www.cheniere.org/misc/oulist.htm
> >
> > > And I will predict something else -- when Celani's
> > > "invention" doesn't work, his followers will proclaim
> > > that the government and/or the current energy producers
> > > have conspired to suppress his work.
> >
> > > Mind you, I myself would *love* to see it work out --
> > > and for scientific reasons as well and economic and
> > > environmental ones. =A0But as I said, I've seen far too
> > > many of these come and go.
> >
> > > Seth
>
> :
> > Did you read the article that was in November 2012 issue of Popular Scien=
> ce?
>
> I admit I did not, as that is not one I subscribe to.


http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2012-10/andrea-rossis-black-box


>
> :
> > The author clearly said that Francisco Celani showed him the written
> > details of his various experiments.
>
> And did Celani provide the entire details of his
> apparatus? A description so exhaustive
> that anyone reading it could reproduce the apparatus
> without needing to know any further details?

Read the above article and come to your own conclusion. If you know how to
make a home made electric light bulb--and have a tank of hydrogen gas and
some constantan wire that you rough up--you could perform the same
experiment.

Dakota

unread,
Oct 25, 2012, 3:49:07 AM10/25/12
to
On 10/24/2012 8:28 PM, Smiler wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 18:29:33 -0400, Don Martin wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 07:50:20 -0700 (PDT), harry k <tur...@q.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>> <http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2012-10/andrea-rossis-black-box>
>>>>
>>>> probably so--the title of the article in the Popular Science magazine
>>>> is:
>>>>
>>>> Andrea Rossi's Black Box by Steve Featherstone.
>>>
>>> So a "convicted scam artist" conducts a demonstration of a contraption no
>>> one is allowed to exam but runs on a "secret catalyst"...
>>
>> Everyone _knows_ that a secret catalyst is the very best kind!
>
> I've got loads of secret catalyst that I'm trying to get rid of, it's
> cluttering up my yard. Maybe Jason would like to buy some, at $1200 per
> lb...free shipping.
>
My secret catalysts are much more expensive but they come from real
American cats so they're worth every penny. They'll be packed in a
loose, granular material that absorbs odors too.

harry k

unread,
Oct 25, 2012, 4:11:34 AM10/25/12
to
On Oct 24, 11:11 pm, Ja...@nospam.com (Jason) wrote:
> In article
> <14308081-7bb0-4284-9e9a-61c796ccc...@i7g2000pbf.googlegroups.com>, harry
Which has what to do with anything?

Harry K

harry k

unread,
Oct 25, 2012, 4:12:33 AM10/25/12
to
On Oct 24, 11:12 pm, Ja...@nospam.com (Jason) wrote:
> In article <jcbh88tb68slvpsa880g76cc44v7i8f...@4ax.com>, Mike Painter
The details were not disclosed. He is afraid the scam would be
revealed.

Harry K
It is loading more messages.
0 new messages