Ja...@nospam.com (Jason) wrote:
> In article
> <29b57201-e847-4154-b448-e2ecb5b1e...@s9g2000pbh.googlegroups.com>, harry
> k <turn...@q.com> wrote:

> > On Oct 28, 1:16=A0pm, Ja...@nospam.com (Jason) wrote:
> > > In article
> > > <bf244269-6e8d-408b-a14a-eb7ba692a...@rj6g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>, harr=
> > y

> > > k <turn...@q.com> wrote:
> > > > On Oct 28, 12:14=3DA0am, Jeanne Douglas <hlwdj...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrot=
> > e:
> > > > > In article
> > > > > <Jason-2710122354060...@66-53-214-250.lsan.mdsg-pacwest.com>,

> > > > > =3DA0Ja...@nospam.com (Jason) wrote:
> > > > > > In article
> > > > > > <5893521e-9fb4-4115-af67-52a5caf23...@n7g2000pbj.googlegroups.com>,=
> >  har=3D
> > > > ry
> > > > > > k <turn...@q.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > On Oct 27, 8:38=3D3DA0pm, Ja...@nospam.com (Jason) wrote:
> > > > > > > > In article <pan.2012.10.28.00.30.37.125...@JoeKing.com>, Smiler

> > > > > > > > <Youmus...@JoeKing.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > On Fri, 26 Oct 2012 15:09:39 -0700, Jason wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > In article <b65133cd-88d0-47b5-be8f-0be62da9c...@googlegrou=
> > ps.c=3D
> > > > om>,
> > > > > > > > > > tirebiter <dontspamme...@bigfoot.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > > > <snip>

> > > > > > > > > >> Why is it so hard for you to understand that if he hasn't =
> > file=3D
> > > > d for =3D3D
> > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > >> patent his alleged "invention" CAN BE RIPPED OFF. =3D3DA0B=
> > ut if =3D
> > > > he has, =3D3D
> > > > > > > he can
> > > > > > > > > >> publish details in the newspaper and NO ONE COULD STEAL IT=
> > ?

> > > > > > > > > >> Why Jason?

> > > > > > > > > > Perhaps the reason Rossi has not yet filed for a patent is =
> > beca=3D
> > > > use he=3D3D
> > > > > > > =3DA0had
> > > > > > > > > > not yet perfected his invention. Rossi wants to get the bug=
> > s ou=3D
> > > > t befo=3D3D
> > > > > > > re
> > > > > > > > > > filing for a patent. In other words, Rossi wants to make su=
> > re h=3D
> > > > is
> > > > > > > > > > invention is working great every time--before filing for a =
> > pate=3D
> > > > nt. If=3D3D
> > > > > > > =3DA0he
> > > > > > > > > > does not do it that way--he will end up looking like a frau=
> > d or=3D
> > > > =A0a nut
> > > > > > > > > > case.

> > > > > > > > > Too late! He already does.

> > > > > > > > It will get worse if his black box invention does not work.

> > > > > > > There is no "if" about it - it won't. =3DA0Just ask him to unplug=
> >  it fr=3D
> > > > om
> > > > > > > the wall while he is "doing and experiment".

> > > > > > > Harry K

> > > > > > He claims his invention has to plugged in to get the invention star=
> > ted.
> > > > > > You could ask him to unplug it after the invention is started.

> > > > > He REFUSED to unplug it after the "invention" was started.

> > > > > --
> > > > > JD

> > > > > "Osama Bin Laden is dead and GM is alive."--VP Joseph Biden

> > > > Another exampleof Jason only reading what he wants to read totally
> > > > ignoring pertinent facts.

> > > > Harry K

> > > Perhaps Rossi refused to unplug his black box because he did not know for
> > > sure whether or not the cold fusion invention had fully started. If he
> > > installed a bell on it that would ring when the invention was fully
> > > started--he would know when he could unplug it.

> > And perhaps he didn't unplug it because the "devil made him do it".
> > You are grasping at straws and failing miserably.'

> > Harry K

> I am giving Rossi the benefit of the doubt.