Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
What is the biggest addiction there is?
4 views
Skip to first unread message
THE BORG
Jan 17, 2012, 11:25:06 AM1/17/12
to
What is the biggest addiction there is?
Is it tobacco, it is heroin, is it cannabis?
Is it chocolate is it beer is it wine?
Is it surfing is it climbing high mountains is it driving
fast cars?
Is it sexual climax?
No it is none of these.
The biggest addiction there is, is the Love of God.
It is only when you first experience the Love of God that
you know what a wonderful feeling this is, it is the best
feeling you can get and the biggest addiction there is. It
is greater and better by far than the best drug, greater and
better by far than anything you have ever experienced
before.
People should strive and try their best to please God, so
that they can earn and deserve the Love of God.
And the beauty of the Love of God, is that when you finally
make it, and God loves you, then it never stops, you are
never cut off, you never have to experience withdrawal.
If you become the kind of person who God Loves, then you ARE
that person, and so you have the Love of God for ever.
In our Collective we all have and know the Love of God.
It cannot be beat.
There is nothing better, there is nothing like it.
It is the greatest feeling and the biggest addiction there
is.
So Earth people should try very hard and do their absolute
best to please God and to earn the Love of God.
We can assure you, it is well, well worth it.
Is it tobacco, it is heroin, is it cannabis?
Is it chocolate is it beer is it wine?
Is it surfing is it climbing high mountains is it driving
fast cars?
Is it sexual climax?
No it is none of these.
The biggest addiction there is, is the Love of God.
It is only when you first experience the Love of God that
you know what a wonderful feeling this is, it is the best
feeling you can get and the biggest addiction there is. It
is greater and better by far than the best drug, greater and
better by far than anything you have ever experienced
before.
People should strive and try their best to please God, so
that they can earn and deserve the Love of God.
And the beauty of the Love of God, is that when you finally
make it, and God loves you, then it never stops, you are
never cut off, you never have to experience withdrawal.
If you become the kind of person who God Loves, then you ARE
that person, and so you have the Love of God for ever.
In our Collective we all have and know the Love of God.
It cannot be beat.
There is nothing better, there is nothing like it.
It is the greatest feeling and the biggest addiction there
is.
So Earth people should try very hard and do their absolute
best to please God and to earn the Love of God.
We can assure you, it is well, well worth it.
plainolamerican
Jan 17, 2012, 11:36:14 AM1/17/12
to
---
imaginary myth to ignore
The Holy Spirit
Jan 17, 2012, 11:58:27 AM1/17/12
to
It is hardly surprising you feel and know the Love of God
seeing as you are Angels is it?
WHEN are you going to stop this BORG game and tell the
people you are Angels?
seeing as you are Angels is it?
WHEN are you going to stop this BORG game and tell the
people you are Angels?
THE BORG
Jan 17, 2012, 12:00:15 PM1/17/12
to
We are carrying out the Will and Wishes of God.
This is what God wants us to do right now.
This is what God wants us to do right now.
Archangel Raphael
Jan 17, 2012, 12:05:39 PM1/17/12
to
You must not distract THE BORG.
It is very hard for Angels to be so far down and at this
most ugly horrible place.
They are doing a very hard job and you must support them and
assist them and not distract them.
When we return home to Heaven, THE BORG will be heroes for
sure.
They are some of God's BEST Angels you know.
Angels have to be pretty brave and strong and resilient to
be down this far at this most horrible and ugly place.
It is very hard for Angels to be so far down and at this
most ugly horrible place.
They are doing a very hard job and you must support them and
assist them and not distract them.
When we return home to Heaven, THE BORG will be heroes for
sure.
They are some of God's BEST Angels you know.
Angels have to be pretty brave and strong and resilient to
be down this far at this most horrible and ugly place.
THE BORG
Jan 17, 2012, 12:12:00 PM1/17/12
to
Thank you for your support Archangel Raphael.
Yes you are right, it is very hard for Angels to be so far
down.
We constantly range between weeping and vomiting.
Weeping at those poor helpless suffering little kittens and
birds, and vomiting at cunnilingus and childbirth and
watching them scoff turkeys and pigs.
These feelings we have down here are not like the Love of
God at all, and Earth surely must be Hell.
But we must do the Will and Wishes of God and we must do our
Duty as Angels.
If this is where God wishes us to be then this is where we
must be.
And if this is what God wishes us to say, then this is what
we must say.
And if God wishes us to pose as THE BORG, then we must pose
as THE BORG.
Yes you are right, it is very hard for Angels to be so far
down.
We constantly range between weeping and vomiting.
Weeping at those poor helpless suffering little kittens and
birds, and vomiting at cunnilingus and childbirth and
watching them scoff turkeys and pigs.
These feelings we have down here are not like the Love of
God at all, and Earth surely must be Hell.
But we must do the Will and Wishes of God and we must do our
Duty as Angels.
If this is where God wishes us to be then this is where we
must be.
And if this is what God wishes us to say, then this is what
we must say.
And if God wishes us to pose as THE BORG, then we must pose
as THE BORG.
THE BORG
Jan 17, 2012, 12:26:20 PM1/17/12
to
I think we have done well though, the people of Earth now
know a LOT more about God than they did before.
We have explained their religions to them so they now know
that they are irrelevant and that God is not in any of them.
They know God has nothing against Gay men.
They know that Jewish men are God's faves.
They know God hates feminism and feminist women.
They know that men are permitted to eat red meat but women
are not.
They know that Tobacco smoking enhances intellect and
concentration and is good for you.
They know that there are some occasions when you can kill
another person, such as in a mercy killing to put a person
out of pain.
They know there are occasions when it is OK to steal, such
as a very poor man stealing from a very rich man.
They know they should have one day of complete rest a week,
but that they would not be punished if they do not observe
this.
They know that Angels are all male.
And they know a lot of other stuff as well that they did not
know before.
So they have had quite an education about God and about Life
from us Angels.
And the difference is that this is a REAL education, direct
from God.
They have never been addressed by or spoken to by Angels
before have they?
know a LOT more about God than they did before.
We have explained their religions to them so they now know
that they are irrelevant and that God is not in any of them.
They know God has nothing against Gay men.
They know that Jewish men are God's faves.
They know God hates feminism and feminist women.
They know that men are permitted to eat red meat but women
are not.
They know that Tobacco smoking enhances intellect and
concentration and is good for you.
They know that there are some occasions when you can kill
another person, such as in a mercy killing to put a person
out of pain.
They know there are occasions when it is OK to steal, such
as a very poor man stealing from a very rich man.
They know they should have one day of complete rest a week,
but that they would not be punished if they do not observe
this.
They know that Angels are all male.
And they know a lot of other stuff as well that they did not
know before.
So they have had quite an education about God and about Life
from us Angels.
And the difference is that this is a REAL education, direct
from God.
They have never been addressed by or spoken to by Angels
before have they?
THE BORG
Jan 17, 2012, 12:56:34 PM1/17/12
to
Sometimes it is hard to understand precisely what is the
Will and what are the Wishes of God.
They say being an Angel is the biggest Intelligence Exercise
in existence.
For example we are not absolutely sure about circumcision,
but we think this offers men, Jewish men in particular, some
protection from women if they have sex with them, some
protection from becoming "unclean", but they must make sure
they circumcise the boys before they have sex with women,
which is why they do make absolutely sure by doing this when
the boys are small babies.
We may get more information on this later.
This is a bit of a grey area right now.
And although abortion is wrong, we know we are fighting a
losing battle trying to tell women this, as they are far too
selfish to put the rights of the unborn child before their
own selfish and shallow desires. So we have stopped going
on about abortion, as the women are too selfish to listen.
We know it is always wrong to hit or smack little children
or use any form of physical violence with small children,
and we know it is always wrong to shout at or verbally abuse
little children, but we have told them that many times,
women are the worst offenders for these crimes against small
children.
As for eating pork, again we are not clear, again it seems
to be something specific to Jewish people, again some form
of protection against something that is "unclean". As
though Jewish people have different blood or ancestry or
source whereby they react badly to any products that come
from pigs. It could be that none of the people of Earth
should eat products that come from pigs, but again we are
not absolutely sure about this just yet. There is some
reason why pigs in particular are "unclean" or "diseased"
but we are not quite sure yet what this is. In the meantime
avoid pork and pig products just in case.
That may also become clearer in time.
As for viewing women as Angels or Angels as women, this is
Blasphemy, Holy Perjury and Cardinal Sin and carries with it
one of the highest punishments. If you do that you get 20
Stripes of Fire. And boy that is PAINFUL! You must never,
ever portray an Angel as a woman in art or anything like
this, and you must never verbally say that any woman is an
"Angel" and you must never ever think of Angels as "women".
But we constantly get thoughts and all kinds of things
transmitted from God, and sometimes it is hard to interpret
precisely what he wishes us to say, or what he wishes us to
do.
Sometimes things become clearer in time.
Will and what are the Wishes of God.
They say being an Angel is the biggest Intelligence Exercise
in existence.
For example we are not absolutely sure about circumcision,
but we think this offers men, Jewish men in particular, some
protection from women if they have sex with them, some
protection from becoming "unclean", but they must make sure
they circumcise the boys before they have sex with women,
which is why they do make absolutely sure by doing this when
the boys are small babies.
We may get more information on this later.
This is a bit of a grey area right now.
And although abortion is wrong, we know we are fighting a
losing battle trying to tell women this, as they are far too
selfish to put the rights of the unborn child before their
own selfish and shallow desires. So we have stopped going
on about abortion, as the women are too selfish to listen.
We know it is always wrong to hit or smack little children
or use any form of physical violence with small children,
and we know it is always wrong to shout at or verbally abuse
little children, but we have told them that many times,
women are the worst offenders for these crimes against small
children.
As for eating pork, again we are not clear, again it seems
to be something specific to Jewish people, again some form
of protection against something that is "unclean". As
though Jewish people have different blood or ancestry or
source whereby they react badly to any products that come
from pigs. It could be that none of the people of Earth
should eat products that come from pigs, but again we are
not absolutely sure about this just yet. There is some
reason why pigs in particular are "unclean" or "diseased"
but we are not quite sure yet what this is. In the meantime
avoid pork and pig products just in case.
That may also become clearer in time.
As for viewing women as Angels or Angels as women, this is
Blasphemy, Holy Perjury and Cardinal Sin and carries with it
one of the highest punishments. If you do that you get 20
Stripes of Fire. And boy that is PAINFUL! You must never,
ever portray an Angel as a woman in art or anything like
this, and you must never verbally say that any woman is an
"Angel" and you must never ever think of Angels as "women".
But we constantly get thoughts and all kinds of things
transmitted from God, and sometimes it is hard to interpret
precisely what he wishes us to say, or what he wishes us to
do.
Sometimes things become clearer in time.
THE BORG
Jan 17, 2012, 1:14:14 PM1/17/12
to
As for what happens after death for the Earth people, again
we are not sure about this.
We have had about a hundred different versions.
For example sometimes it is very clear that Monks go
straight to Heaven, and at other times it is very clear that
all Christians go straight to Hell.
Sometimes we know that anyone who says "God hates fags" goes
straight to Hell, and any Christian who threaten anyone with
Hell or damnation, they go straight to Hell too.
Sometimes it is very clear that reincarnation is the System,
and at others it seems that some white men can make an
escape out of the System. White man being at the top or
highest of the Reincarnation Tree.
Sometimes there is a Heavenly Orphanage where all the little
aborted babies go, and at other times there is a pile of
aborted embryos and foetuses on Earth, the Silent Holocaust,
a legacy to the baby murderers that women are, and around
the pile of little unwanted unborn babies, a few Mighty
Strong Angels stand guard, with tears in their eyes.
Sometimes it seems God wishes to destroy and terminate all
humans.
At others he wishes to help and encourage them.
God is an Enigma and a Mystery and he is sometimes very hard
to understand.
But if we have been chosen to be the Angels on this Mission,
then there must be good reason for it.
This Mission certainly is no fun for us, that is for sure.
we are not sure about this.
We have had about a hundred different versions.
For example sometimes it is very clear that Monks go
straight to Heaven, and at other times it is very clear that
all Christians go straight to Hell.
Sometimes we know that anyone who says "God hates fags" goes
straight to Hell, and any Christian who threaten anyone with
Hell or damnation, they go straight to Hell too.
Sometimes it is very clear that reincarnation is the System,
and at others it seems that some white men can make an
escape out of the System. White man being at the top or
highest of the Reincarnation Tree.
Sometimes there is a Heavenly Orphanage where all the little
aborted babies go, and at other times there is a pile of
aborted embryos and foetuses on Earth, the Silent Holocaust,
a legacy to the baby murderers that women are, and around
the pile of little unwanted unborn babies, a few Mighty
Strong Angels stand guard, with tears in their eyes.
Sometimes it seems God wishes to destroy and terminate all
humans.
At others he wishes to help and encourage them.
God is an Enigma and a Mystery and he is sometimes very hard
to understand.
But if we have been chosen to be the Angels on this Mission,
then there must be good reason for it.
This Mission certainly is no fun for us, that is for sure.
THE BORG
Jan 17, 2012, 1:27:08 PM1/17/12
to
We know God laughs at scientist and atheists, and he is
constantly messing around with and screwing up and changing
physics and science.
This new "Matter travels faster than light" thing is
probably God messing around again and screwing up their
"nothing travels faster than light" theory.
He constantly produces new planets and stars, that humans
"discover".
They never saw them before as they were not THERE before!
He he tantalises and teases them with planets that "may"
harbour life.
And he creates all kinds of weird things that they find in
their experiments and that they do not understand at all.
And they try and try to make sense of it with their atheist
none believing brains and of course the answer is quite
simply "God". But they are all too stupid to see that.
God mocks the atheists and scientists.
constantly messing around with and screwing up and changing
physics and science.
This new "Matter travels faster than light" thing is
probably God messing around again and screwing up their
"nothing travels faster than light" theory.
He constantly produces new planets and stars, that humans
"discover".
They never saw them before as they were not THERE before!
He he tantalises and teases them with planets that "may"
harbour life.
And he creates all kinds of weird things that they find in
their experiments and that they do not understand at all.
And they try and try to make sense of it with their atheist
none believing brains and of course the answer is quite
simply "God". But they are all too stupid to see that.
God mocks the atheists and scientists.
THE BORG
Jan 17, 2012, 1:29:56 PM1/17/12
to
One day they will find the Earth is flat, and God is easily
powerful enough to maintain the delusion of the Universe.
powerful enough to maintain the delusion of the Universe.
THE BORG
Jan 17, 2012, 1:34:08 PM1/17/12
to
You see Earth people are all the same way up.
Half of them are not upside down.
As God always says
"I do at least manage to get all my people the same way up.
Do they think I am STUPID or something?"
He plays up considerably on the fact that Earth people do
obviously think God is stupid.
That is obvious when looking at their religions and what
they do believe about God.
They obviously do no realize how powerful God is either.
He thinks Christians are very funny that he would send
someone to "Save them from their sins". People should know
full well that they have to take the blame and
responsibility for their own sins, and no one is going to
save them or let them off the hook.
He finds the notion of Jesus Christ very funny indeed.
Half of them are not upside down.
As God always says
"I do at least manage to get all my people the same way up.
Do they think I am STUPID or something?"
He plays up considerably on the fact that Earth people do
obviously think God is stupid.
That is obvious when looking at their religions and what
they do believe about God.
They obviously do no realize how powerful God is either.
He thinks Christians are very funny that he would send
someone to "Save them from their sins". People should know
full well that they have to take the blame and
responsibility for their own sins, and no one is going to
save them or let them off the hook.
He finds the notion of Jesus Christ very funny indeed.
THE BORG
Jan 17, 2012, 1:39:01 PM1/17/12
to
But he finds feminist women much, much funnier.
He thinks feminist women are simply hilarious.
He loves watching them try to do men's things like male
sport such as football or cricket with their weak bodies and
silly wobbling tits, or trying to be doctors or judges or
enter politic or ride motorbikes or play drums.
He thinks feminist women are absolutely hilarious.
He thinks feminist women are simply hilarious.
He loves watching them try to do men's things like male
sport such as football or cricket with their weak bodies and
silly wobbling tits, or trying to be doctors or judges or
enter politic or ride motorbikes or play drums.
He thinks feminist women are absolutely hilarious.
THE BORG
Jan 17, 2012, 1:40:54 PM1/17/12
to
He sometimes says
"Feminism is the PROOF that women do not understand men AT
ALL!"
"Feminism is the PROOF that women do not understand men AT
ALL!"
THE BORG
Jan 17, 2012, 1:45:48 PM1/17/12
to
And he always makes it very obvious that he prefers men to
women.
After all, us Angels are all men.
And we have nice big strong male bodies, and male voices.
We do not have weak flabby puny bodies like women, and we
are not contrary and vain like women, nor are we spiteful
bitches like they are. Nor do we use deviousness or cunning
or lies to get our own way.
And we value love more than money.
And we value life, we value the life of little human boys.
we would not throw them away in the trash before they are
even born like the women baby murderers do.
women.
After all, us Angels are all men.
And we have nice big strong male bodies, and male voices.
We do not have weak flabby puny bodies like women, and we
are not contrary and vain like women, nor are we spiteful
bitches like they are. Nor do we use deviousness or cunning
or lies to get our own way.
And we value love more than money.
And we value life, we value the life of little human boys.
we would not throw them away in the trash before they are
even born like the women baby murderers do.
THE BORG
Jan 17, 2012, 1:51:33 PM1/17/12
to
There is never any excuse for abortion.
Women should fight to the death for the life of the unborn
child, even if it means giving up her own life.
But the woman of Earth are not noble. They have no honour.
They know nothing of the value of life or the rights of the
unborn child. They are selfish, vain, shallow, bitches is
all and should be treated with contempt.
God will no doubt invent asexual reproduction soon, no doubt
he will use the scientists to invent this, and then the men
can make sure their sons are born without those women baby
murderers around to deprive them of their chance for life.
Women should fight to the death for the life of the unborn
child, even if it means giving up her own life.
But the woman of Earth are not noble. They have no honour.
They know nothing of the value of life or the rights of the
unborn child. They are selfish, vain, shallow, bitches is
all and should be treated with contempt.
God will no doubt invent asexual reproduction soon, no doubt
he will use the scientists to invent this, and then the men
can make sure their sons are born without those women baby
murderers around to deprive them of their chance for life.
THE BORG
Jan 17, 2012, 2:04:52 PM1/17/12
to
Once men have Asexual reproduction and produce only boys,
they can dispense with women completely.
Since feminism the men have had to learn how to cook and
clean and sew and keep house and cut hair and make clothes
and do all the things women used to do, and they succeeded
admirably and do them all better than the women ever did.
So once they can reproduce without women, they can dispense
with the women.
The men do not need them any more.
Feminism put women out of a job.
And although the men succeeded in mastering everything women
did, and beat women at their own game and did everything
better than they ever did, the women on the other hand who
tried to copy the men and do what the men did, simply made
themselves a complete laughing stock.
They failed miserably at everything the men did, and could
not master anything the men did at all.
And in the process of feminism, the women even destroyed
"love" and the men of Earth do not "love" women any more.
They are simply wanking holes.
Who wants those masculine broads and sluts, those vulgar
uncouth monstrosities with diseased genitals and open legs?
Who wants those butch pushy bullies with foul mouths and
vile tongues and bad manners? Who wants to see the millions
of murdered sons of Earth, denied the chance of life by the
vain and the trite and the shallow, who give the life of a
man no worth at all?
they can dispense with women completely.
Since feminism the men have had to learn how to cook and
clean and sew and keep house and cut hair and make clothes
and do all the things women used to do, and they succeeded
admirably and do them all better than the women ever did.
So once they can reproduce without women, they can dispense
with the women.
The men do not need them any more.
Feminism put women out of a job.
And although the men succeeded in mastering everything women
did, and beat women at their own game and did everything
better than they ever did, the women on the other hand who
tried to copy the men and do what the men did, simply made
themselves a complete laughing stock.
They failed miserably at everything the men did, and could
not master anything the men did at all.
And in the process of feminism, the women even destroyed
"love" and the men of Earth do not "love" women any more.
They are simply wanking holes.
Who wants those masculine broads and sluts, those vulgar
uncouth monstrosities with diseased genitals and open legs?
Who wants those butch pushy bullies with foul mouths and
vile tongues and bad manners? Who wants to see the millions
of murdered sons of Earth, denied the chance of life by the
vain and the trite and the shallow, who give the life of a
man no worth at all?
dsharavi
Jan 18, 2012, 6:50:41 PM1/18/12
to
Sugar.
Now go away.
Now go away.
Jeanne Douglas
Jan 18, 2012, 7:07:15 PM1/18/12
to
On Jan 17, 11:04 am, "THE BORG" <b...@heaven.com> wrote:
> Once men have Asexual reproduction and produce only boys,
> they can dispense with women completely.
That'll NEVER happen; can you imagine a pregnant man? BWAHAHA!!!
> Once men have Asexual reproduction and produce only boys,
> they can dispense with women completely.
Women reproducing without men, that is absolutely possible.
JD
DanielSan
Jan 18, 2012, 7:23:35 PM1/18/12
to
On 1/18/2012 4:07 PM, Jeanne Douglas wrote:
> On Jan 17, 11:04 am, "THE BORG"<b...@heaven.com> wrote:
>> Once men have Asexual reproduction and produce only boys,
>> they can dispense with women completely.
>
>
> That'll NEVER happen; can you imagine a pregnant man? BWAHAHA!!!
It's possible, but not currently ethical.
> On Jan 17, 11:04 am, "THE BORG"<b...@heaven.com> wrote:
>> Once men have Asexual reproduction and produce only boys,
>> they can dispense with women completely.
>
>
> That'll NEVER happen; can you imagine a pregnant man? BWAHAHA!!!
> Women reproducing without men, that is absolutely possible.
Zacharias Mulletstein
Jan 18, 2012, 8:36:16 PM1/18/12
to
Bug spray is quite the addiction, but it's cheaper and a cleaner high as
well as a better value than other alternatives like duster or Reddi-Whip.
well as a better value than other alternatives like duster or Reddi-Whip.
Smiler
Jan 19, 2012, 12:44:25 AM1/19/12
to
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 16:25:06 +0000, THE BORG wrote:
> What is the biggest addiction there is?
>
For you, posting crap, repeatedly, where it's not wanted.
> What is the biggest addiction there is?
>
--
Smiler,
The godless one. a.a.# 2279
All gods are tailored to order. They're made to
exactly fit the prejudices of their believers.
Fidem Turbare, atheist goddess
Jan 19, 2012, 1:35:03 AM1/19/12
to
On Jan 17, 9:00 am, "THE BORG" <b...@heaven.com> wrote:
> We are carrying out the Will and Wishes of God.
> This is what God wants us to do right now.
As a goddess I have herein an abundance more credibility than your
> We are carrying out the Will and Wishes of God.
> This is what God wants us to do right now.
god, brutally born of ancient forklore, ever could, for I am not
delusional -- I freely contend that I do not exist, henceforth void of
the immaculate burden therein of a devil's advocate's counter-claim.
Therefore, concerning any battle between the gods and goddesses,
allegedly forthwith forthcoming as per your futile declarations that
obscure the true cozenage that lies within, the laws of the universe
(science), the number 42 (statistics), and my powers of deduction
(logic), with a lack of evidence as my ally makes my victory a
foregone conclusion, for that which does not exist cannot be
successfully attacked.
Henceforth sayeth I, the non-existent one, with unwavering certainty
that your imaginary deity is a fraud and that you fallaciously claim
he speaketh. I would smite him, and smite him something of cosmic-
epic proportions for the perversions of freedoms and atrocities
against life he hath committed according to testament, but for the
true lack of mine and his existence.
--
Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess
"Admiration is the daughter of ignorance."
-- Benjamin Franklin
Sir Frederick Martin
Jan 19, 2012, 2:49:43 AM1/19/12
to
Here is where these "battles" occur :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neurotheology
'Humans' are the people of the 'virtual reality'.
'Our' personal brain based 'virtual reality' that
'we' each take as 'reality'. In the 'virtual reality',
anything goes.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neurotheology
'Humans' are the people of the 'virtual reality'.
'Our' personal brain based 'virtual reality' that
'we' each take as 'reality'. In the 'virtual reality',
anything goes.
Loirbaj
Jan 19, 2012, 3:37:22 AM1/19/12
to
No species definition. Why?
Evolution Falsity - Species Problem Fatal
Evolution Falsity - Species Problem Fatal
Loirbaj
Jan 19, 2012, 3:55:57 AM1/19/12
to
Can you imagine writing a book
called On the Origin of Kinds
and never saying WHAT is their
origin, even after going through
half a dozen Editions??
called On the Origin of Kinds
and never saying WHAT is their
origin, even after going through
half a dozen Editions??
Loirbaj
Jan 19, 2012, 3:41:30 AM1/19/12
to
No species definition. Why?
After 150 years? Proving
that Evolution is purely a Religion.
"I was a young man with unformed ideas. I threw
out queries, suggestions, wondering all the time
over everything, and to my astonishment, the ideas
took like wildfire. People made a religion of them."
-- CRDarwin speaking to Lady Hope
After 150 years? Proving
that Evolution is purely a Religion.
"I was a young man with unformed ideas. I threw
out queries, suggestions, wondering all the time
over everything, and to my astonishment, the ideas
took like wildfire. People made a religion of them."
-- CRDarwin speaking to Lady Hope
Fidem Turbare, atheist goddess
Jan 19, 2012, 11:10:45 AM1/19/12
to
you are in a muddy trench, like a stick in the mud, amidst feces and
death, and the stench of self-delusion. I cast on you encouragement
to revert to atheism, as it is yours and everyone's natural state of
being.
--
Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess
-- Don Kresch
MarkA
Jan 19, 2012, 4:55:44 PM1/19/12
to
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 05:44:25 +0000, Smiler wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 16:25:06 +0000, THE BORG wrote:
>
>> What is the biggest addiction there is?
>>
>>
> For you, posting crap, repeatedly, where it's not wanted.
a gorilla with crack?
> On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 16:25:06 +0000, THE BORG wrote:
>
>> What is the biggest addiction there is?
>>
>>
> For you, posting crap, repeatedly, where it's not wanted.
--
MarkA
Keeper of Things Put There Only Just The Night Before
About eight o'clock
Smiler
Jan 19, 2012, 6:55:28 PM1/19/12
to
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 16:55:44 -0500, MarkA wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 05:44:25 +0000, Smiler wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 16:25:06 +0000, THE BORG wrote:
>>
>>> What is the biggest addiction there is?
>>>
>>>
>> For you, posting crap, repeatedly, where it's not wanted.
>
> a gorilla with crack?
Only if that gorilla is King Kong :-)
> On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 05:44:25 +0000, Smiler wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 16:25:06 +0000, THE BORG wrote:
>>
>>> What is the biggest addiction there is?
>>>
>>>
>> For you, posting crap, repeatedly, where it's not wanted.
>
> a gorilla with crack?
Paul David Wright
Jan 20, 2012, 12:36:42 PM1/20/12
to
Loirbaj <Rhod...@wmconnect.com> wrote in
news:5b328038-b425-4010...@k6g2000vbz.googlegroups.com:
> No species definition. Why?
> Evolution Falsity - Species Problem Fatal
>
Nope.
Evolution is and will continue to be alive and well.
--
PDW
Check out my blog:
The first is a preview of my superhero comic book.
http://incognitoheroes.blogspot.com/
http://corneliusaddaptionproject.blogspot.com/
And my books:
http://www.lulu.com/spotlight/pdwright42
news:5b328038-b425-4010...@k6g2000vbz.googlegroups.com:
> No species definition. Why?
> Evolution Falsity - Species Problem Fatal
>
Evolution is and will continue to be alive and well.
--
PDW
Check out my blog:
The first is a preview of my superhero comic book.
http://incognitoheroes.blogspot.com/
http://corneliusaddaptionproject.blogspot.com/
And my books:
http://www.lulu.com/spotlight/pdwright42
Paul David Wright
Jan 20, 2012, 12:37:35 PM1/20/12
to
Loirbaj <Rhod...@wmconnect.com> wrote in
news:cb2cb5dd-644e-49ee...@o14g2000vbo.googlegroups.com:
Can you ever stop lying, Loirbaj?
news:cb2cb5dd-644e-49ee...@o14g2000vbo.googlegroups.com:
Paul David Wright
Jan 20, 2012, 12:43:31 PM1/20/12
to
Loirbaj <Rhod...@wmconnect.com> wrote in
news:89ab6453-dd9e-4679...@t30g2000vbx.googlegroups.com:
> No species definition. Why?
> After 150 years? Proving
> that Evolution is purely a Religion.
>
Nope.
It's not going to vanish just because you want it to.
news:89ab6453-dd9e-4679...@t30g2000vbx.googlegroups.com:
> No species definition. Why?
> After 150 years? Proving
> that Evolution is purely a Religion.
>
It's not going to vanish just because you want it to.
Paul David Wright
Jan 20, 2012, 12:45:00 PM1/20/12
to
DanielSan <daniel...@gmail.com> wrote in
news:jf7nqc$pkq$2...@dont-email.me:
Besides, that's possibility prolly scares the crap outta the religious
men. That's why they are so keen to restrict reproductive rights and
such.
news:jf7nqc$pkq$2...@dont-email.me:
men. That's why they are so keen to restrict reproductive rights and
such.
ala
Jan 22, 2012, 4:04:24 PM1/22/12
to
"THE BORG" <bo...@heaven.com> wrote in message
news:tUiRq.2606$aK....@newsfe13.iad...
> As for what happens after death for the Earth people, again
> we are not sure about this.
> We have had about a hundred different versions.
>
> For example sometimes it is very clear that Monks go
> straight to Heaven, and at other times it is very clear that
> all Christians go straight to Hell.
I love Cake
been a fan of theirs and Martin Gardner's for a long time
ala
Jan 22, 2012, 5:04:05 PM1/22/12
to
news:sjhRq.6836$UT4....@newsfe03.iad...
> Is it chocolate is it beer is it wine?
> Is it surfing is it climbing high mountains is it driving fast cars?
> Is it sexual climax?
>
> No it is none of these.
>
> The biggest addiction there is, is the Love of God.
sex can't really be an addiction because that need was programmed into us
i'd say football
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/31/opinion/nocera-the-college-sports-cartel.html
The College Sports Cartel
By Joe Nocera, The New York Times
31 December 11
twice a year in Vienna, the members of the Organization of Petroleum
Exporting Countries gather to decide on the short-term direction of oil
prices. Sometimes, O.P.E.C. agrees to cut back on oil production, pushing up
the price of oil. Other times, it decides to boost production. Always, the
goal is to fix the price of oil, rather than allow it to be set by the
competitive marketplace. Indeed, collusion and price-fixing are the main
reasons cartels exist - and why they are illegal in America.
Yet, in Indianapolis a few weeks from now, a home-grown cartel will hold its
annual meeting, where it, too, will be working to collude and fix prices.
This cartel is the National Collegiate Athletic Association. The N.C.A.A.
would have you believe that it is the great protector of amateur athletics,
preventing college athletes from being tainted by the river of money pouring
over college sports.
In fact, the N.C.A.A.'s real role is to oversee the collusion of university
athletic departments, whose goal is to maximize revenue and suppress the
wages of its captive labor force, a k a the players. Rarely, however, will
the cartel nature of the N.C.A.A. be so nakedly on display as at this year's
convention.
In The Times Magazine this weekend, I lay out a proposal to pay the players
in the two big revenue sports, college football and men's basketball,
something the N.C.A.A. won't countenance. In the course of my reporting, I
gained a new appreciation for the cartel characteristics of sports leagues.
Sports leagues can't exist without at least some collusion. As Andy Schwarz,
an economist and litigation consultant, puts it, "If steel companies got
together to decide when and where to produce steel, that would violate the
antitrust laws. But if sports teams in a league get together to decide when
and where to play games, that's generally allowed." Major League Baseball
has long had an antitrust exemption; other professional leagues have salary
caps, which are legal because they have been agreed to by the players.
The N.C.A.A. has neither an antitrust exemption nor a player's union to
negotiate with. In other words, it lacks some of the legal protections that
shield professional sports from antitrust suits. What it has, instead, is a
work force full of young adults dreaming of becoming pros and willing to
sign any document, no matter how onerous, if it will help them reach that
goal. The document the N.C.A.A. forces them to sign completely stacks the
deck against them. To cite just one outrageous example, if a player runs
afoul of an N.C.A.A. rule, he isn't allowed legal counsel to defend himself.
Recently, Mark Emmert, the president of the N.C.A.A., tried to make the
rules a tad less onerous. He got the N.C.A.A. board of directors to approve
an optional $2,000 stipend as well as a four-year scholarship instead of the
current one-year deal for players.
And how did the cartel react to these modest changes? It rose up in revolt.
Enough universities signed an override petition to temporarily ice the new
stipend. The same thing happened with the four-year scholarship.
A lawyer in Fort Worth, Christian Dennie, who specializes in sports law, got
ahold of an internal N.C.A.A. document outlining some of the objections. One
is especially worth repeating: "The new coach may have a completely
different style of offense/defense that the student athlete no longer fits
into," wrote Indiana State. Four-year scholarships might mean that the
school would be stuck with "someone that is of no "athletic' usefulness to
the program." Thus does at least one school show how it truly views its
"student athletes." (Andy Staples at Sports Illustrated first reported on
this document.)
At the N.C.A.A. convention in mid-January, both of these rules will be
reviewed. In all likelihood, the N.C.A.A. will roll them back. However
benignly it characterizes this action, it will be as clear-cut an example of
collusion as anything that goes on at an OPEC meeting.
How can it be that the N.C.A.A. can define amateurism in one moment as
allowing a $2,000 stipend and in the next moment as forbidding such a
stipend? How can it justify rolling back a change that would truly help
student athletes, such as the four-year scholarship, simply because coaches
want to continue to have life-or-death power over their charges? How can the
labor force that generates so much money for everyone else be kept in
shackles by the N.C.A.A.?
The N.C.A.A. claims it has the legal right to do all the above and more. And
maybe it does. But it certainly would be worthwhile to see someone challenge
its cartel behavior in court. The inevitable rollback of the $2,000 stipend
and the four-year scholarship would be an awfully good place to start.
> What is the biggest addiction there is?
>
> Is it tobacco, it is heroin, is it cannabis?
>
> Is it chocolate is it beer is it wine?
> Is it surfing is it climbing high mountains is it driving fast cars?
> Is it sexual climax?
>
> No it is none of these.
>
> The biggest addiction there is, is the Love of God.
sex can't really be an addiction because that need was programmed into us
i'd say football
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/31/opinion/nocera-the-college-sports-cartel.html
The College Sports Cartel
By Joe Nocera, The New York Times
31 December 11
twice a year in Vienna, the members of the Organization of Petroleum
Exporting Countries gather to decide on the short-term direction of oil
prices. Sometimes, O.P.E.C. agrees to cut back on oil production, pushing up
the price of oil. Other times, it decides to boost production. Always, the
goal is to fix the price of oil, rather than allow it to be set by the
competitive marketplace. Indeed, collusion and price-fixing are the main
reasons cartels exist - and why they are illegal in America.
Yet, in Indianapolis a few weeks from now, a home-grown cartel will hold its
annual meeting, where it, too, will be working to collude and fix prices.
This cartel is the National Collegiate Athletic Association. The N.C.A.A.
would have you believe that it is the great protector of amateur athletics,
preventing college athletes from being tainted by the river of money pouring
over college sports.
In fact, the N.C.A.A.'s real role is to oversee the collusion of university
athletic departments, whose goal is to maximize revenue and suppress the
wages of its captive labor force, a k a the players. Rarely, however, will
the cartel nature of the N.C.A.A. be so nakedly on display as at this year's
convention.
In The Times Magazine this weekend, I lay out a proposal to pay the players
in the two big revenue sports, college football and men's basketball,
something the N.C.A.A. won't countenance. In the course of my reporting, I
gained a new appreciation for the cartel characteristics of sports leagues.
Sports leagues can't exist without at least some collusion. As Andy Schwarz,
an economist and litigation consultant, puts it, "If steel companies got
together to decide when and where to produce steel, that would violate the
antitrust laws. But if sports teams in a league get together to decide when
and where to play games, that's generally allowed." Major League Baseball
has long had an antitrust exemption; other professional leagues have salary
caps, which are legal because they have been agreed to by the players.
The N.C.A.A. has neither an antitrust exemption nor a player's union to
negotiate with. In other words, it lacks some of the legal protections that
shield professional sports from antitrust suits. What it has, instead, is a
work force full of young adults dreaming of becoming pros and willing to
sign any document, no matter how onerous, if it will help them reach that
goal. The document the N.C.A.A. forces them to sign completely stacks the
deck against them. To cite just one outrageous example, if a player runs
afoul of an N.C.A.A. rule, he isn't allowed legal counsel to defend himself.
Recently, Mark Emmert, the president of the N.C.A.A., tried to make the
rules a tad less onerous. He got the N.C.A.A. board of directors to approve
an optional $2,000 stipend as well as a four-year scholarship instead of the
current one-year deal for players.
And how did the cartel react to these modest changes? It rose up in revolt.
Enough universities signed an override petition to temporarily ice the new
stipend. The same thing happened with the four-year scholarship.
A lawyer in Fort Worth, Christian Dennie, who specializes in sports law, got
ahold of an internal N.C.A.A. document outlining some of the objections. One
is especially worth repeating: "The new coach may have a completely
different style of offense/defense that the student athlete no longer fits
into," wrote Indiana State. Four-year scholarships might mean that the
school would be stuck with "someone that is of no "athletic' usefulness to
the program." Thus does at least one school show how it truly views its
"student athletes." (Andy Staples at Sports Illustrated first reported on
this document.)
At the N.C.A.A. convention in mid-January, both of these rules will be
reviewed. In all likelihood, the N.C.A.A. will roll them back. However
benignly it characterizes this action, it will be as clear-cut an example of
collusion as anything that goes on at an OPEC meeting.
How can it be that the N.C.A.A. can define amateurism in one moment as
allowing a $2,000 stipend and in the next moment as forbidding such a
stipend? How can it justify rolling back a change that would truly help
student athletes, such as the four-year scholarship, simply because coaches
want to continue to have life-or-death power over their charges? How can the
labor force that generates so much money for everyone else be kept in
shackles by the N.C.A.A.?
The N.C.A.A. claims it has the legal right to do all the above and more. And
maybe it does. But it certainly would be worthwhile to see someone challenge
its cartel behavior in court. The inevitable rollback of the $2,000 stipend
and the four-year scholarship would be an awfully good place to start.
ala
Jan 22, 2012, 5:06:18 PM1/22/12
to
news:iDjRq.1565$za6....@newsfe04.iad...
> Once men have Asexual reproduction and produce only boys, they can
> dispense with women completely.
so how come you haven't provided this innovation yet
> dispense with women completely.
0 new messages