Received: by 10.66.85.130 with SMTP id h2mr1972532paz.8.1352319643870;
        Wed, 07 Nov 2012 12:20:43 -0800 (PST)
Path: 6ni68065pbd.1!nntp.google.com!news.glorb.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: SilentO...@hotmail.com
Newsgroups: alt.abortion,alt.atheism,alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic
Subject: Re: Syd M proven to be a liar.
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 15:20:24 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 277
Message-ID: <gcgl985nrn6nh471uatbmq73dkors988s5@6ax.com>
References: <c9bd981i6qvfcd4jofalficl5gfnal8aco@6ax.com> <ce996173-e322-45b1-9d78-fba189100084@h15g2000yqe.googlegroups.com> <826i98dvgb6u6v40lcj1nlhmkfi2ug3l12@6ax.com> <f42d6b39-29aa-4082-a3ec-0e8f2b63e188@h9g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> <utfi98pmf2oslvjoc1ted7ncs2nhppghne@6ax.com> <51732a96-894a-4b11-b993-3ae04d1d34ee@g14g2000yqp.googlegroups.com> <b82j98d3gaap3mlojfnk5lqjasvht5m2ti@6ax.com> <3eb45392-202c-41f1-8e66-758d9d4be1c6@v3g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="0fd7a224608a955e8bfb28230296cf13";
	logging-data="26756"; mail-complaints-to="ab...@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/fDem9jdv4VnSK61aUCumwP/lzxiJWitk="
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 6.00/32.1186
Cancel-Lock: sha1:v6hJRgSda88vmMvXl3iW2oEAnJ0=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

On Wed, 7 Nov 2012 06:55:40 -0800 (PST), Dino <whate...@homemail.com>
wrote:

>On Nov 6, 5:12 pm, SilentO...@hotmail.com wrote:
>> On Tue, 6 Nov 2012 10:04:08 -0800 (PST), Dino <whate...@homemail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >On Nov 6, 12:07 pm, SilentO...@hotmail.com wrote:
>> >> On Tue, 6 Nov 2012 07:49:54 -0800 (PST), Dino <whate...@homemail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>>
>> >> >On Nov 6, 9:06 am, SilentO...@hotmail.com wrote:
>> >> >> On Sun, 4 Nov 2012 10:12:07 -0800 (PST), Dino <whate...@homemail.com>
>> >> >> wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >On Nov 4, 1:03 pm, SilentO...@hotmail.com wrote:
>> >> >> >> On Sun, 4 Nov 2012 08:46:07 -0800 (PST), "Syd M."
>>
>> >> >> >> <pauldavidwri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >On Nov 4, 11:42 am, Dino <whate...@homemail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> On Nov 4, 11:31 am, "Syd M." <pauldavidwri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > On Nov 3, 9:45 pm, Dino <whate...@homemail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > On Nov 3, 9:57 pm, "Syd M." <pauldavidwri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > > On Nov 3, 9:43 pm, Dino <whate...@homemail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > On Nov 3, 9:01 pm, "Syd M." <pauldavidwri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > > On Nov 3, 8:52 pm, Dino <whate...@homemail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > On Nov 3, 8:45 pm, "Syd M." <pauldavidwri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > On Nov 3, 8:23 pm, Dino <whate...@homemail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > On Nov 3, 8:18 pm, "Syd M." <pauldavidwri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > > On Nov 3, 7:31 pm, Dino <whate...@homemail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > > > On Nov 3, 7:28 pm, "Syd M." <pauldavidwri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > On Nov 3, 5:40 pm, J <jdyou...@ymail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > These 5 people make their case why they are grateful to be alive.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > So, the fetus should have priority of a adult, thinking woman?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > > > No one is asking the fetus to have priority.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > > Yes, you are.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > Nope, I am saying that the body is going to do exactly what it is
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > intended to do.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > A beating heart...does just that..it beats. Because it's supposed to.
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > Should the heart have priority over your body?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > A fetus is developing..because it is supposed too.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > Wow, Syd is ignoring this
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > You are having a hard time understanding that, I know.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > > Everytime you insist that a pregnent woman carry her fetus to term
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > > weather she wants to or not, you are giving the fetus priority.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > Mmm... a lie. Where did I insist that a pregnant woman carry to term?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > This is the part where you run away.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > I smell the rubber burning.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > > I have explained this to you repeatedly. It's not my fault you don't
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > > want to hear it.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > Uh, you got to show me where I EVER insisted that a pregnant woman
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > carry to term.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > I think not, misogynist.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > > > What makes anyone who says abortion is wrong, a misogynist?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > > Because you don't think a grown woman can make decisions about her own
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > > body.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > Where did I ever say that?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > No answer
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > Again, this is the part where you run away.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > And the part where I can say, I've proven you to be a liar.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > Because you have lied.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > a) I've NEVER said a pregnant woman be forced or insist she carry to
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > term.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > b) I've NEVER said that a grown woman is not able to make decisions
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > about her own body.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > Care to lie some more?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > So, you don't think a fetus should have more priority then a woman?
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > Then you are not anti-abortion then, liar?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > You have some lies to address. And answering them with a question, is
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > not helping you.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > Now, show where I've EVER insisted any woman be forced to carry a baby
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > to term.
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > Otherwise retract and apologize for lying.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > Show where I've EVER said a grown woman is not able to make decisions
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > about her own body.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > > Stop it.
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > > You know what you believe.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > Yep, I know what I believe. But you have to lie about it.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > > If your pro-life, your anti-woman.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > Oh?
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > And where is your proof?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > > Simple as that.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > Yep, you're a liar. And it's proven.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > > > You can't even own up to your own words, coward.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > > So, you don't believe a mother should be forced to carry her fetus to
>> >> >> >> >> > > > term?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > It is your claim to prove. So don't answer my question with a
>> >> >> >> >> > > question.
>> >> >> >> >> > > YOU made a claim, I expect YOU to be able to either
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > a) support it
>> >> >> >> >> > > b) retract it
>> >> >> >> >> > > or
>> >> >> >> >> > > c) just stop lying and run away.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > > That's the statement I haven't noticed you tackling, liar.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > You made the claim, therefore it is up to YOU to support it.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > You are backed into a corner. It is time for you to either retract and
>> >> >> >> >> > > apologize or just run away
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > > Either way, you can't really redeem yourself now.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> > I notice that you still haven't answered my question.
>> >> >> >> >> > So, the point stands.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> I noticed you made TWO specific claims about me.
>> >> >> >> >> And I asked you to back them up. And you are refusing to do so.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> Now, my questions came to you first. So, are you or are you NOT going
>> >> >> >> >> to support your claims?
>>
>> >> >> >> >Your 'pro-life'; Therefore you believe that a woman needs to be forced
>> >> >> >> >to carry a pregnancy thru.
>> >> >> >> >Dispute that all you like, but that is the position of the 'pro-life'
>> >> >> >> >movement, asshole. All your smoke screen can't hide that simple fact.
>>
>> >> >> >> >PDW
>>
>> >> >> >> Dino isn't anti-abortion.
>>
>> >> >> >> He just thinks that most abortions are irresponsible,...
>>
>> >> >> >And that is it.
>>
>> >> >> As a matter of fact, that is not "it".
>>
>> >> >> You also support legislation making abortion more difficult to obtain.
>>
>> >> >You can twist it all you want, you can use any scare tactic you
>> >> >want...I really don't care.
>>
>> >> I didn't twist anything, rightard.
>>
>> >Yes you are lefty loon. This is how you loons operate.
>> >You try to bully and intimidate.  This is one person, you can't bully
>> >and you can't intimidate.
>>
>> You want a tissue, rightard?
>>
>> >I stand by my position, 100%.
>> >You can kick, scream, hold your breath, threaten, or what ever else
>> >you want to do.
>> >At the end of the day, all you will have accomplished is you kicked,
>> >screamed, held your breath, and gave out empty threats.
>>
>> When did I kick, scream, hold my breath and give out threats,
>> rightard?
>
>"yawn"
>Enjoy your tantrum.

You sink further into the depths of rightardedness every day,
rightard.

Heh heh...

Lying racist rightard socialists...

Batshit crazy and dogshit stupid, every single last one of you.

 


>
>>
>> You're imagination is running away with you, I fear.
>>
>> Another symptom of your rightardedness, I suppose.
>>
>> >Nothing else will change.
>>
>> >> You support legislation making abortion more difficult to obtain.
>>
>> >> You've clearly said so.
>>
>> >I have never said I want to make abortion more difficult to obtain.
>> >You are a liar.
>>
>> The laws you support -do- make an abortion more difficult to obtain,
>> rightard.
>>
>> That's -reality-.
>>
>> One can't support a law, but oppose the consequences of the law.
>>
>> >> >I actually support sensible legislation that would actually help
>> >> >protect women and give them
>> >> >options, in case they need real help.
>>
>> >> Talk about "twisting"...
>>
>> >There is no twisting at all, I stand by what I say.
>>
>> >Good bye now.
>>
>> Otto's Law:  The rightardedness of a rightard is in direct proportion
>> to how much they snip.
>>
>> Talk about "twisting"...
>>
>> There is nothing in the legislation you've said you support that
>> provides any mechanism or funding to protect women or give them
>> any help.
>>
>> Neither have you provided anything, beyond wishful thinking, that the
>> laws you support will aid women in any way.
>>
>> That the laws you favor makes abortion more difficult to obtain is
>> beyond dispute.
>>
>> That the laws you favor protect women is speculative and unsupported.
>>
>> Heh heh...
>>
>> Lying racist rightard socialists...
>>
>> Batshit crazy and dogshit stupid, every single last one of you.