Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
alt.atheism
+ new post
About this group
Subscribe to this group
This is a Usenet group - learn more
Message from discussion 32% - A Third of Young Adults Not Affiliated with a Religion
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Tim  
View profile  
 More options Nov 3 2012, 9:58 am
Newsgroups: alt.atheism
From: "Tim" <a...@b.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2012 09:58:19 -0400
Local: Sat, Nov 3 2012 9:58 am
Subject: Re: 32% - A Third of Young Adults Not Affiliated with a Religion
Print | View thread | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author

"duke"  wrote in message news:mvl59851559q5qafqn26bina3hvhmg7gjr@4ax.com...
On Thu, 01 Nov 2012 15:13:28 -0400, SilentO...@hotmail.com wrote:
>On Thu, 01 Nov 2012 12:52:50 -0500, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:

>>On Thu, 01 Nov 2012 13:00:40 -0400, SilentO...@hotmail.com wrote:

>>>On Thu, 01 Nov 2012 06:17:41 -0500, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:

>>>>On Thu, 01 Nov 2012 06:14:05 -0400, SilentO...@hotmail.com wrote:

>>>>>On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 13:42:38 -0500, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:

>>>>>>On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 10:40:24 -0400, SilentO...@hotmail.com wrote:

>>>>>>>On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 06:17:57 -0500, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:

>>>>>>>>On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 13:37:27 -0400, SilentO...@hotmail.com wrote:

>>>>>>>>>On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 07:08:50 -0500, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net>
>>>>>>>>>wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 10:55:36 -0400, SilentO...@hotmail.com wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>A singularity -still- isn't nothing.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>I know.  I said that.  The singularity appeared in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>nothingness.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>You've no evidence a singularity appeared in nothingness.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Of course I can.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Lie?
>>>>>>>>>>>>Nope.
>>>>>>>>>>>Yep.

>>>>>>>>>>>Science does not support your claims.

>>>>>>>>>>Yep, there was "nothing" for the singularity to appear in.

>>>>>>>>>Nope.
>>>>>>>>>Science does not support your claim of an "appearing singularity".

>>>>>>>>Science can't.

>>>>>>>That means you're lying when you try to use science to support your
>>>>>>>theological beliefs.
>>>>>>Wrong -
>>>>>Liar.

>>>>Noooooo, they both agree on creation.

>>>>>>theological beliefs and science both agree that a moment of creation
>>>>>>took place some 13.7 billion years ago.
>>>>>That's accurate.

>>>>Of course it is.

>>>>>>The true answer is God did it.
>>>>>That's a claim that's not supported by science.
>>>>>You're lying.

>>>>Then offer an alternative.

>>>Certain mathematical models suggest that the big bang was a
>>>manifestation of physical structures beyond our current ability to
>>>detect.  See M-theory.
>>God-theory is more accurate.
>Nope.

God-theory is beyond question.  M-theory is a joke.

---------------
Which only goes to show that it is not testable and therefore does not
constitute a theory in any way, shape, or form. You lose, again, yawn.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2013 Google