Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

The World's Leading Prediction Market: Obama 62.9% - Romney 37.2%

49 views
Skip to first unread message

John Manning

unread,
Oct 28, 2012, 6:43:24 PM10/28/12
to


INTRADE - The World's Leading Prediction Market

With Ten days til the election, Obama 62.9% - Romney 37.2%

http://www.intrade.com/v4/markets/?eventId=84326

Mulligan

unread,
Oct 28, 2012, 6:50:24 PM10/28/12
to
On Oct 28, 3:43 pm, John Manning <jrobe...@terra.com.br> wrote:
> INTRADE - The World's Leading Prediction Market
>
> With Ten days til the election, Obama 62.9% -  Romney 37.2%

Looks like I am going to be rich.

•R.Measures

unread,
Oct 30, 2012, 5:56:50 AM10/30/12
to
In article <z-OdnSO_eoCWKBDN...@giganews.com>, John Manning
*** John M.: It vexes me greatly that you count chickens before the eggs
hatch. If women per chance lose their power of female intuition om 6
November, the Mormon God in embroyo could win the election and we could
get trickled down on again for four years

•R.Measures

unread,
Oct 30, 2012, 5:59:15 AM10/30/12
to
In article
<b4819d72-edc8-42f8...@i2g2000pbi.googlegroups.com>,
Mulligan <t2jud...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Oct 28, 3:43=A0pm, John Manning <jrobe...@terra.com.br> wrote:
> > INTRADE - The World's Leading Prediction Market
> >
> > With Ten days til the election, Obama 62.9% - =A0Romney 37.2%
>
> Looks like I am going to be rich.

** You will either be crowing about it or munching on crow sandwich M.

John Manning

unread,
Oct 30, 2012, 8:22:58 AM10/30/12
to
I'm just reporting the readily available prediction market news,
Rich. It certainly isn't conclusive because it ain't over until the
fat lady sings - as I'm acutely aware of. Ergo, no chickens counted.

AGAINST GODLESS SOCIALISM

unread,
Oct 30, 2012, 8:36:00 AM10/30/12
to
On Oct 30, 5:22 am, John Manning <jrobe...@terra.com.br> wrote:
> On 10/30/2012 7:56 AM, •R.Measures wrote:
>
> > In article <z-OdnSO_eoCWKBDNnZ2dnUVZ_g8AA...@giganews.com>, John Manning
> > <jrobe...@terra.com.br> wrote:
>
> >> INTRADE - The World's Leading Prediction Market
>
> >> With Ten days til the election, Obama 62.9% -  Romney 37.2%
>
> >>http://www.intrade.com/v4/markets/?eventId=84326
>
> > ***  John M.:  It vexes me greatly that you count chickens before the eggs
> > hatch.  If women per chance lose their power of female intuition om 6
> > November, the Mormon God in embroyo could win the election and we could
> > get trickled down on again for four years
>
> I'm just reporting the readily available prediction market news,
> Rich. It certainly isn't conclusive because it ain't over until the
> fat lady sings - as I'm acutely aware of. Ergo, no chickens counted.

http://www.truthandgrace.com/obama.htm

Logan Sacket

unread,
Oct 30, 2012, 6:03:22 PM10/30/12
to
For all we know, the odds of Romney winning will still be below 50%
even after he wins.

•R.Measures

unread,
Oct 30, 2012, 9:18:14 PM10/30/12
to
In article <cvudndJlX-8_WxLN...@giganews.com>, John Manning
<jrob...@terra.com.br> wrote:

> On 10/30/2012 7:56 AM, •R.Measures wrote:
> > In article <z-OdnSO_eoCWKBDN...@giganews.com>, John Manning
> > <jrob...@terra.com.br> wrote:
> >
> >> INTRADE - The World's Leading Prediction Market
> >>
> >> With Ten days til the election, Obama 62.9% - Romney 37.2%
> >>
> >> http://www.intrade.com/v4/markets/?eventId=84326
> >
> > *** John M.: It vexes me greatly that you count chickens before the eggs
> > hatch. If women per chance lose their power of female intuition om 6
> > November, the Mormon God in embroyo could win the election and we could
> > get trickled down on again for four years
> >
>
>
> I'm just reporting the readily available prediction market news,

*** Yes but it's still tempting fate John.

•R.Measures

unread,
Oct 30, 2012, 9:19:47 PM10/30/12
to
In article <50914e6f....@news.eternal-september.org>,
• winning what?

John Manning

unread,
Oct 31, 2012, 12:12:03 PM10/31/12
to
On 10/30/2012 11:18 PM, •R.Measures wrote:
> In article <cvudndJlX-8_WxLN...@giganews.com>, John Manning
> <jrob...@terra.com.br> wrote:
>
>> On 10/30/2012 7:56 AM, •R.Measures wrote:
>>> In article <z-OdnSO_eoCWKBDN...@giganews.com>, John Manning
>>> <jrob...@terra.com.br> wrote:
>>>
>>>> INTRADE - The World's Leading Prediction Market
>>>>
>>>> With Ten days til the election, Obama 62.9% - Romney 37.2%
>>>>
>>>> http://www.intrade.com/v4/markets/?eventId=84326
>>>
>>> *** John M.: It vexes me greatly that you count chickens before the eggs
>>> hatch. If women per chance lose their power of female intuition om 6
>>> November, the Mormon God in embroyo could win the election and we could
>>> get trickled down on again for four years
>>>
>>
>>
>> I'm just reporting the readily available prediction market news,
>
> *** Yes but it's still tempting fate John.


I don't believe that, Rich.

Mulligan

unread,
Oct 31, 2012, 3:27:07 PM10/31/12
to
On Oct 30, 6:19 pm, r...@somis.org ( R.Measures) wrote:
> In article <50914e6f.1643995...@news.eternal-september.org>,
>
>
>
>
>
> logan.sac...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 02:59:15 -0700, r...@somis.org ( R.Measures) wrote:
>
> > >In article
> > ><b4819d72-edc8-42f8-b9c1-ff12d6fb4...@i2g2000pbi.googlegroups.com>,
> > >Mulligan <t2judgm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > >> On Oct 28, 3:43=A0pm, John Manning <jrobe...@terra.com.br> wrote:
> > >> > INTRADE - The World's Leading Prediction Market
>
> > >> > With Ten days til the election, Obama 62.9% - =A0Romney 37.2%
>
> > >> Looks like I am going to be rich.
>
> > >**  You will either be crowing about it or munching on crow sandwich M.
>
> > For all we know, the odds of Romney winning will still be below 50%
> > even after he wins.
>
>  winning what?- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

why do you type here?

•R.Measures

unread,
Oct 31, 2012, 4:24:34 PM10/31/12
to
In article <Eb-dnaJuxfFO0AzN...@giganews.com>, John Manning
<jrob...@terra.com.br> wrote:

> On 10/30/2012 11:18 PM, •R.Measures wrote:
> > In article <cvudndJlX-8_WxLN...@giganews.com>, John Manning
> > <jrob...@terra.com.br> wrote:
> >
> >> On 10/30/2012 7:56 AM, •R.Measures wrote:
> >>> In article <z-OdnSO_eoCWKBDN...@giganews.com>, John Manning
> >>> <jrob...@terra.com.br> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> INTRADE - The World's Leading Prediction Market
> >>>>
> >>>> With Ten days til the election, Obama 62.9% - Romney 37.2%
> >>>>
> >>>> http://www.intrade.com/v4/markets/?eventId=84326
> >>>
> >>> *** John M.: It vexes me greatly that you count chickens before the eggs
> >>> hatch. If women per chance lose their power of female intuition om 6
> >>> November, the Mormon God in embroyo could win the election and we could
> >>> get trickled down on again for four years
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> I'm just reporting the readily available prediction market news,
> >
> > *** Yes but it's still tempting fate John.
>
>
> I don't believe that, Rich.
>
*** If too many bimbos show up and vote for Willard there could be a bad
outcome.

�R.Measures

unread,
Oct 31, 2012, 4:25:41 PM10/31/12
to
In article
<f1eef35a-eb82-4cb3...@u4g2000pbo.googlegroups.com>,
Mulligan <t2jud...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Oct 30, 6:19=A0pm, r...@somis.org ( R.Measures) wrote:
> > In article <50914e6f.1643995...@news.eternal-september.org>,
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > logan.sac...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 02:59:15 -0700, r...@somis.org ( R.Measures) wrote:
> >
> > > >In article
> > > ><b4819d72-edc8-42f8-b9c1-ff12d6fb4...@i2g2000pbi.googlegroups.com>,
> > > >Mulligan <t2judgm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > >> On Oct 28, 3:43=3DA0pm, John Manning <jrobe...@terra.com.br> wrote:
> > > >> > INTRADE - The World's Leading Prediction Market
> >
> > > >> > With Ten days til the election, Obama 62.9% - =3DA0Romney 37.2%
> >
> > > >> Looks like I am going to be rich.
> >
> > > >** =A0You will either be crowing about it or munching on crow sandwich=
> M.
> >
> > > For all we know, the odds of Romney winning will still be below 50%
> > > even after he wins.
> >
> > =A0winning what?- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> why do you type here?

*** Zzzzzzzz

John Manning

unread,
Oct 31, 2012, 4:33:43 PM10/31/12
to
On 10/31/2012 6:24 PM, •R.Measures wrote:
> In article <Eb-dnaJuxfFO0AzN...@giganews.com>, John Manning
> <jrob...@terra.com.br> wrote:
>
>> On 10/30/2012 11:18 PM, •R.Measures wrote:
>>> In article <cvudndJlX-8_WxLN...@giganews.com>, John Manning
>>> <jrob...@terra.com.br> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 10/30/2012 7:56 AM, •R.Measures wrote:
>>>>> In article <z-OdnSO_eoCWKBDN...@giganews.com>, John Manning
>>>>> <jrob...@terra.com.br> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> INTRADE - The World's Leading Prediction Market
>>>>>>
>>>>>> With Ten days til the election, Obama 62.9% - Romney 37.2%
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.intrade.com/v4/markets/?eventId=84326
>>>>>
>>>>> *** John M.: It vexes me greatly that you count chickens before the eggs
>>>>> hatch. If women per chance lose their power of female intuition om 6
>>>>> November, the Mormon God in embroyo could win the election and we could
>>>>> get trickled down on again for four years
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I'm just reporting the readily available prediction market news,
>>>
>>> *** Yes but it's still tempting fate John.
>>
>>
>> I don't believe that, Rich.
>>
> *** If too many bimbos show up and vote for Willard there could be a bad
> outcome.
>


Non sequitur.







Logan Sacket

unread,
Oct 31, 2012, 11:32:27 PM10/31/12
to
If all the Bimbos from the Bimbo erruption days showed up to vote, it
could cause the polls to be way off.

Logan Sacket

unread,
Oct 31, 2012, 11:33:23 PM10/31/12
to
To make you ask questions

•R.Measures

unread,
Nov 1, 2012, 7:34:01 AM11/1/12
to
In article <esOdnfrwDZO7FgzN...@giganews.com>, John Manning
*** To wit: perceptive women can now see through Romney but bimbos are
slow to catch on John. If not enough perceptive women turn out to vote we
may well hit a sour note.

•R.Measures

unread,
Nov 1, 2012, 7:39:24 AM11/1/12
to
In article <5094ecda....@news.eternal-september.org>,
• Indeed Logan S. indeed. Unless more bimbos are made aware of what
allegedly goes on in Mormondom's Celestial Copulatorium the election could
go Mor(m)on.

•R.Measures

unread,
Nov 1, 2012, 7:40:05 AM11/1/12
to
In article <5095ed79....@news.eternal-september.org>,
• chortle

John Manning

unread,
Nov 1, 2012, 10:32:04 AM11/1/12
to
On 11/1/2012 9:34 AM, •R.Measures wrote:
> In article <esOdnfrwDZO7FgzN...@giganews.com>, John Manning
> <jrob...@terra.com.br> wrote:
>
Look up the meaning of non sequitur.


Mulligan

unread,
Nov 1, 2012, 2:38:02 PM11/1/12
to
On Nov 1, 7:32 am, John Manning <jrobe...@terra.com.br> wrote:

> Look up the meaning of non sequitur.- Hide quoted text -


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DVQ3-Xe_suY

Logan Sacket

unread,
Nov 1, 2012, 7:11:32 PM11/1/12
to
For Conservatives, women's sufferage was a big mistake.

Mulligan

unread,
Nov 1, 2012, 7:16:42 PM11/1/12
to
On Nov 1, 4:11 pm, logan.sac...@gmail.com (Logan Sacket) wrote:
> On Thu, 01 Nov 2012 04:39:24 -0700, r...@somis.org (•R.Measures) wrote:
> >In article <5094ecda.1750087...@news.eternal-september.org>,
> >logan.sac...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> >> On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 13:24:34 -0700, r...@somis.org (•R.Measures) wrote:
>
> >> >In article <Eb-dnaJuxfFO0AzNnZ2dnUVZ_tKdn...@giganews.com>, John Manning
> >> ><jrobe...@terra.com.br> wrote:
>
> >> >> On 10/30/2012 11:18 PM, •R.Measures wrote:
> >> >> > In article <cvudndJlX-8_WxLNnZ2dnUVZ_q-dn...@giganews.com>, John Manning
> >> >> > <jrobe...@terra.com.br> wrote:
>
> >> >> >> On 10/30/2012 7:56 AM, •R.Measures wrote:
> >> >> >>> In article <z-OdnSO_eoCWKBDNnZ2dnUVZ_g8AA...@giganews.com>, John
> >Manning
> >> >> >>> <jrobe...@terra.com.br> wrote:
>
> >> >> >>>> INTRADE - The World's Leading Prediction Market
>
> >> >> >>>> With Ten days til the election, Obama 62.9% -  Romney 37.2%
>
> >> >> >>>>http://www.intrade.com/v4/markets/?eventId=84326
>
> >> >> >>> ***  John M.:  It vexes me greatly that you count chickens before
> >the eggs
> >> >> >>> hatch.  If women per chance lose their power of female intuition om 6
> >> >> >>> November, the Mormon God in embroyo could win the election and we could
> >> >> >>> get trickled down on again for four years
>
> >> >> >> I'm just reporting the readily available prediction market news,
>
> >> >> > ***  Yes but it's still tempting fate John.
>
> >> >> I don't believe that, Rich.
>
> >> >***  If too many bimbos show up and vote for Willard there could be a bad
> >> >outcome.
>
> >> If all the Bimbos from the Bimbo erruption days showed up to vote, it
> >> could cause the polls to be way off.
>
> >•  Indeed Logan S.  indeed.  Unless more bimbos are made aware of what
> >allegedly goes on in Mormondom's Celestial Copulatorium the election could
> >go Mor(m)on.

I am sure they are thrilled about eternal youth and very pleasurable
eternity.

>
> For Conservatives, women's sufferage was a big mistake.- Hide quoted text -

•R.Measures

unread,
Nov 2, 2012, 6:32:07 AM11/2/12
to
In article <R7mdnagDbex_Gg_N...@giganews.com>, John Manning
*** - non sequitur n.
1. An inference or conclusion that does not follow from the premises or
evidence.
2. A statement that does not follow logically from what preceded it.
[Latin nÅn sequitur, it does not follow : nÅn, not + sequitur, third
person sing. present tense of sequh, to follow.]

It follows that if women are allowed to vote the bimbos for Mitt issue
coold tilt the election John.

•R.Measures

unread,
Nov 2, 2012, 6:35:39 AM11/2/12
to
In article <509b0185....@news.eternal-september.org>,
• Indeed. Good one Logan. If Mitt wins we can probably expect an
attempt to repeal the 19th Ammendment.

•R.Measures

unread,
Nov 2, 2012, 6:46:05 AM11/2/12
to
In article
<796c5779-49ef-42e7...@i7g2000pbf.googlegroups.com>,
Mulligan <t2jud...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Nov 1, 4:11=A0pm, logan.sac...@gmail.com (Logan Sacket) wrote:
> > On Thu, 01 Nov 2012 04:39:24 -0700, r...@somis.org (=95R.Measures) wrote:
> > >In article <5094ecda.1750087...@news.eternal-september.org>,
> > >logan.sac...@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> > >> On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 13:24:34 -0700, r...@somis.org (=95R.Measures) wro=
> te:
> >
> > >> >In article <Eb-dnaJuxfFO0AzNnZ2dnUVZ_tKdn...@giganews.com>, John Mann=
> ing
> > >> ><jrobe...@terra.com.br> wrote:
> >
> > >> >> On 10/30/2012 11:18 PM, =E2=80=A2R.Measures wrote:
> > >> >> > In article <cvudndJlX-8_WxLNnZ2dnUVZ_q-dn...@giganews.com>, John =
> Manning
> > >> >> > <jrobe...@terra.com.br> wrote:
> >
> > >> >> >> On 10/30/2012 7:56 AM, =C3=A2=E2=82=AC=C2=A2R.Measures wrote:
> > >> >> >>> In article <z-OdnSO_eoCWKBDNnZ2dnUVZ_g8AA...@giganews.com>, Joh=
> n
> > >Manning
> > >> >> >>> <jrobe...@terra.com.br> wrote:
> >
> > >> >> >>>> INTRADE - The World's Leading Prediction Market
> >
> > >> >> >>>> With Ten days til the election, Obama 62.9% - =A0Romney 37.2%
> >
> > >> >> >>>>http://www.intrade.com/v4/markets/?eventId=3D84326
> >
> > >> >> >>> *** =A0John M.: =A0It vexes me greatly that you count chickens =
> before
> > >the eggs
> > >> >> >>> hatch. =A0If women per chance lose their power of female intuit=
> ion om 6
> > >> >> >>> November, the Mormon God in embroyo could win the election and =
> we could
> > >> >> >>> get trickled down on again for four years
> >
> > >> >> >> I'm just reporting the readily available prediction market news,
> >
> > >> >> > *** =A0Yes but it's still tempting fate John.
> >
> > >> >> I don't believe that, Rich.
> >
> > >> >*** =A0If too many bimbos show up and vote for Willard there could be=
> a bad
> > >> >outcome.
> >
> > >> If all the Bimbos from the Bimbo erruption days showed up to vote, it
> > >> could cause the polls to be way off.
> >
> > >=95 =A0Indeed Logan S. =A0indeed. =A0Unless more bimbos are made aware o=
> f what
> > >allegedly goes on in Mormondom's Celestial Copulatorium the election cou=
> ld
> > >go Mor(m)on.
>
> I am sure they are thrilled about eternal youth and very pleasurable
> eternity.
>
*** From my experiences with GFs, more than one at a time is far from
sublime. The Mormon idea of a harem of possibly hundreds of women in
estrus with perfect bodies is frightening. Remember Lorena Bobbit, the
woman who bobbed it?. . . . One is enough, two is too much.

John Manning

unread,
Nov 2, 2012, 9:41:37 AM11/2/12
to
On 11/2/2012 8:32 AM, •R.Measures wrote:
> In article <R7mdnagDbex_Gg_N...@giganews.com>, John Manning
> <jrob...@terra.com.br> wrote:
>
>> On 11/1/2012 9:34 AM, •R.Measures wrote:
>>> In article <esOdnfrwDZO7FgzN...@giganews.com>, John Manning
>>> <jrob...@terra.com.br> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 10/31/2012 6:24 PM, •R.Measures wrote:
>>>>> In article <Eb-dnaJuxfFO0AzN...@giganews.com>, John Manning
>>>>> <jrob...@terra.com.br> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 10/30/2012 11:18 PM, •R.Measures wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <cvudndJlX-8_WxLN...@giganews.com>, John Manning
>>>>>>> <jrob...@terra.com.br> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 10/30/2012 7:56 AM, •R.Measures
The meaning is that your answer had didn't follow what I said in
response to your claim that 'reporting the readily available prediction
market news, is "tempting fate."

In other words, your answer had nothing to do with my response to your
claim.







Logan Sacket

unread,
Nov 2, 2012, 9:57:41 PM11/2/12
to
On Fri, 02 Nov 2012 11:41:37 -0200, John Manning
It seems there is a connection there that John does not want to see.

�R.Measures

unread,
Nov 3, 2012, 6:54:36 AM11/3/12
to
In article <--edneJuHtAMUA7Nn...@giganews.com>, John Manning
*** Readily available is still a gamble. Romney could still win and
this nation could suffer again. The problem is that Neo-con
True-Believers ignore failures of their policies. Example Trick-Down does
not fly but Neo-cons are still eager to give it yet another try. .

John Manning

unread,
Nov 3, 2012, 11:03:43 AM11/3/12
to
On 11/3/2012 8:54 AM, •R.Measures wrote:
> In article <--edneJuHtAMUA7Nn...@giganews.com>, John Manning
> <jrob...@terra.com.br> wrote:
>
>> On 11/2/2012 8:32 AM, •R.Measures wrote:
>>> In article <R7mdnagDbex_Gg_N...@giganews.com>, John Manning
>>> <jrob...@terra.com.br> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 11/1/2012 9:34 AM, •R.Measures wrote:
>>>>> In article <esOdnfrwDZO7FgzN...@giganews.com>, John Manning
>>>>> <jrob...@terra.com.br> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 10/31/2012 6:24 PM, •R.Measures wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <Eb-dnaJuxfFO0AzN...@giganews.com>, John Manning
>>>>>>> <jrob...@terra.com.br> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 10/30/2012 11:18 PM,
> •R.Measures wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In article <cvudndJlX-8_WxLN...@giganews.com>, John
> Manning
>>>>>>>>> <jrob...@terra.com.br> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 10/30/2012 7:56 AM,
> •R.Measures
>>> [Latin nÃ…n sequitur, it does not follow : nÃ…n, not + sequitur, third
>>> person sing. present tense of sequh, to follow.]
>>>
>>> It follows that if women are allowed to vote the bimbos for Mitt issue
>>> coold tilt the election John.
>>>
>>
>> The meaning is that your answer had didn't follow what I said in
>> response to your claim that 'reporting the readily available prediction
>> market news, is "tempting fate."
>
> *** Readily available is still a gamble.


That's what Intrade is, Rich, a betting market. And the odds are
overwhelmingly in Obama's favor. It's that simple.

"Tempting fate" has no meaning in this context.



Romney could still win and
> this nation could suffer again.


Anything is possible. Some things are more likely than others.



The problem is that Neo-con
> True-Believers ignore failures of their policies. Example Trick-Down does
> not fly but Neo-cons are still eager to give it yet another try. .


Stating the obvious.

•R.Measures

unread,
Nov 4, 2012, 3:43:58 AM11/4/12
to
In article <e7udnWQES4rSrwjN...@giganews.com>, John Manning
*** Tuesday will tell whether we continue to recover from 2000-2008 or
this country goes to hell. If Romney wins the popular vote but loses in
the Electoral College I will be amused ---- and relieved.
cheers JM.

John Manning

unread,
Nov 4, 2012, 7:51:46 AM11/4/12
to
On 11/4/2012 6:43 AM, •R.Measures wrote:
> In article <e7udnWQES4rSrwjN...@giganews.com>, John Manning
> <jrob...@terra.com.br> wrote:
>
>> On 11/3/2012 8:54 AM, •R.Measures wrote:
>>> In article <--edneJuHtAMUA7Nn...@giganews.com>, John Manning
>>> <jrob...@terra.com.br> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 11/2/2012 8:32 AM, •R.Measures wrote:
>>>>> In article <R7mdnagDbex_Gg_N...@giganews.com>, John Manning
>>>>> <jrob...@terra.com.br> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 11/1/2012 9:34 AM, •R.Measures wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <esOdnfrwDZO7FgzN...@giganews.com>, John Manning
>>>>>>> <jrob...@terra.com.br> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 10/31/2012 6:24 PM, •R.Measures
> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In article <Eb-dnaJuxfFO0AzN...@giganews.com>, John
> Manning
>>>>>>>>> <jrob...@terra.com.br> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 10/30/2012 11:18 PM,
>>>
> •R.Measures
> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> In article <cvudndJlX-8_WxLN...@giganews.com>, John
>>> Manning
>>>>>>>>>>> <jrob...@terra.com.br> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/30/2012 7:56 AM,
>>>
> •R.Measures
>>>>> [Latin nÃ…n sequitur, it does not follow : nÃ…n, not +
> sequitur, third
>>>>> person sing. present tense of sequh, to follow.]
>>>>>
>>>>> It follows that if women are allowed to vote the bimbos for Mitt issue
>>>>> coold tilt the election John.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The meaning is that your answer had didn't follow what I said in
>>>> response to your claim that 'reporting the readily available prediction
>>>> market news, is "tempting fate."
>>>
>>> *** Readily available is still a gamble.
>>
>>
>> That's what Intrade is, Rich, a betting market. And the odds are
>> overwhelmingly in Obama's favor. It's that simple.
>>
>> "Tempting fate" has no meaning in this context.
>>
> *** Tuesday will tell whether we continue to recover from 2000-2008 or
> this country goes to hell. If Romney wins the popular vote but loses in
> the Electoral College I will be amused ---- and relieved.


Agreed.

TheZ

unread,
Nov 4, 2012, 9:06:46 AM11/4/12
to
The only non-skewed poll, Gallup, puts Romney up by 3%.

"John Manning" <jrob...@terra.com.br> wrote in message
news:z-OdnSO_eoCWKBDN...@giganews.com...

•R.Measures

unread,
Nov 4, 2012, 9:17:40 AM11/4/12
to
In article <PDuls.17188$Be....@newsfe13.iad>, "TheZ" <Th...@nospam.com> wrote:

> The only non-skewed poll,

АА chortle. there is no such thing on this planet.

•RLMeasures

unread,
Dec 2, 2012, 11:41:21 AM12/2/12
to
In article <--edneJuHtAMUA7Nn...@giganews.com>, John Manning
*** Neo-con flavored prediction news was readily avilable which predicted
Romney would win which is now in the dust bin.
0 new messages