> Be hungrier, which really is wonderfully healthier especially for
> diabetics and other heart disease patients:
But not for school children when going to classes.
So BE an Ayoob, and like him, support giving all children an adequate breakfast before school.
"But Keith Ayoob, director of the Rose R. Kennedy Center Nutrition Clinic at Albert Einstein College of Medicine in New York City, said the programs aren¹t the problem.
³There is a mountain of research that shows school breakfasts, and particularly breakfast in the classroom, have a positive outcomes,² he said, describing a drop in truancy, behavior problems and visits to the school nurse as well as an improvement in grades. ³School breakfasts are not making kids overweight. If they¹re eating two breakfasts, parents need to know that and adjust accordingly at home.²
Speaking to the New York Academy of Medicine Thursday, Ayoob defended breakfast programs and stressed the importance of parents keeping track of what their kids are eating.
³We don¹t want some kids going hungry just because some kids are overeating,² he said. ³A child getting two breakfasts is a much easier fix.² http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/health/2012/04/20/school-breakfast-progra... anned-for-feeding-kids-twice/
And, apparently, ABChung would rather have kids hungry all the time and out of control in classes than breakfasted and good students.
-- "Ignorance is preferable to error, and he is less
remote from the- truth who believes nothing than he who believes what is wrong.
Thomas Jefferson
Discussion subject changed to "Don't be an Ayoob; Sign&share this petition to stop the "hunger is starvation" propaganda on 10/22/12" by Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
> "We don't want some kids going hungry just because some kids are
> overeating," he (Keith Ayoob) said. "A child getting two breakfasts is
> a much easier fix."
> Conclusion: Keith Ayoob falsely thinks that hungry kids are starving.
> Bottom line: Kids missing breakfast though still getting lunch and
> dinner are not starving if they are hungry. Those who are dying from
> anything including starvation are not hungry.
Discussion subject changed to "Don't be a Chung, Be an Ayoob; Sign&share this petition to stop Chung's Evil anti-school propaganda on 10/22/12" by Uergil
> > "We don't want some kids going hungry just because some kids are
> > overeating," he (Keith Ayoob) said. "A child getting two breakfasts is
> > a much easier fix."
> > Conclusion: Keith Ayoob falsely thinks that hungry kids are starving.
The REAL conclusion, at least for those reading the whole article is that Chung is off his silly rocker wanting to send school children to sit in classrooms without the benefit of any breakfasts.
Anyone who has ever taught knows that that is a damned fool thing to support.
> > Bottom line: Kids missing breakfast though still getting lunch and
> > dinner are not starving if they are hungry.
But they are inattentive and disruptive in classes until they are fed, so sending them without breakfasts into classrooms is a terrible thing to do.
> Be hungrier, which really is wonderfully healthier especially for
> diabetics and other heart disease patients:
In the first place, not all diabetics are also heart disease patients.
In the second place, very few children in standard classrooms are heart disease patients either, and even fewer are heart disease patients with diabetes.
And if there is one meal a day that such school children OUGHT to have it is breakfast.
So that Chung is TOTALLY wrong and Ayoob is totally right about giving school children breakfasts.
What's the matter, Chung, Are you too stupid to see how wrong you are?
-- "Ignorance is preferable to error, and he is less
remote from the- truth who believes nothing than he who believes what is wrong.
Thomas Jefferson
Discussion subject changed to "Don't be an Ayoob; Sign&share this petition to stop the "hunger is starvation" propaganda on 10/23/12" by Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
> "We don't want some kids going hungry just because some kids are
> overeating," he (Keith Ayoob) said. "A child getting two breakfasts is
> a much easier fix."
> Conclusion: Keith Ayoob falsely thinks that hungry kids are starving.
> Bottom line: Kids missing breakfast though still getting lunch and
> dinner are not starving if they are hungry. Those who are dying from
> anything including starvation are not hungry.
Discussion subject changed to "Don't be an Ayoob; Sign&share this petition to stop the "hunger is starvation" propaganda on 10/24/12" by Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
> "We don't want some kids going hungry just because some kids are
> overeating," he (Keith Ayoob) said. "A child getting two breakfasts is
> a much easier fix."
> Conclusion: Keith Ayoob falsely thinks that hungry kids are starving.
> Bottom line: Kids missing breakfast though still getting lunch and
> dinner are not starving if they are hungry. Those who are dying from
> anything including starvation are not hungry.
Those who have read that entire article can easily see that Andrew, the Chump, is flat out lying about Ayoob.
Which leads one to assume he lies about everything else as well.
-- "Ignorance is preferable to error, and he is less
remote from the- truth who believes nothing than he who believes what is wrong.
Thomas Jefferson
Discussion subject changed to "Don't be an Ayoob; Sign&share this petition to stop the "hunger is starvation" propaganda on 10/25/12" by Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
> "We don't want some kids going hungry just because some kids are
> overeating," he (Keith Ayoob) said. "A child getting two breakfasts is
> a much easier fix."
> Conclusion: Keith Ayoob falsely thinks that hungry kids are starving.
> Bottom line: Kids missing breakfast though still getting lunch and
> dinner are not starving if they are hungry. Those who are dying from
> anything including starvation are not hungry.
In an interview at 11Alive's studio in Atlanta, GA, Andrew B. Chung
said, "The ones who disagree with me the most... who are against me
the most, are actual Christians"
'nuff said by the man himself regarding his false Biblical
interpretations.
The Bible says, "While evildoers and impostors will go from bad to
worse, deceiving and being deceived" 2 Timothy 3:13
1 Corinthians 12:3:
"Therefore I tell you that no one who is speaking by the Spirit of God
says, "Jesus be cursed," and no one can say, "Jesus is Lord," except
by the Holy Spirit"
Regarding the misinterpretation of this Bible verse explained and what
the verse actually means:
Proof that just saying the words "Jesus is Lord" without meaning is
meaningless by an atheist saying "Jesus is Lord" over and over again
without meaning it and without being saved by it:
> This study does exclude those of us who are the LORD's
> who simply **prove** we are born again (John 3:3 & 5) by saying "Jesus
> is LORD" with our mouth (Romans 10:9) unto salvation
Why that being able to say "Jesus is Lord" is not proof of being born
again by an atheist saying it over and over.
> > Only Satan would try to lull people into a false assurance of
> > Salvation in Jesus Christ, by claiming it's summed up in someone's
> > ability to parrot the second half of a Bible verse.
> Only those who work for satan would claim they know what satan would
> do.
Nice try. However, "In order that Satan might not outwit us. For we
are not unaware of his schemes." 2 Corinthians 2:11
Actually, anyone who reads that article sees immediately that Chung is lying!
Ayoob only wants schoolkids to have a breakfast before classes, which, like all educators know. vastly improves their behavior in class.
Ayoob says nothing at all about starving anyone.
The only starvation involved is Chung's brain being oxygen starved.
-- "Ignorance is preferable to error, and he is less
remote from the- truth who believes nothing than he who believes what is wrong.
Thomas Jefferson
Discussion subject changed to "Don't be an Ayoob; Sign&share this petition to stop the "hunger is starvation" propaganda on 10/26/12" by Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
> "We don't want some kids going hungry just because some kids are
> overeating," he (Keith Ayoob) said. "A child getting two breakfasts is
> a much easier fix."
> Conclusion: Keith Ayoob falsely thinks that hungry kids are starving.
> Bottom line: Kids missing breakfast though still getting lunch and
> dinner are not starving if they are hungry. Those who are dying from
> anything including starvation are not hungry.
Discussion subject changed to "Don't be an Ayoob; Sign&share this petition to stop the "hunger is starvation" propaganda on 10/27/12" by Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
> "We don't want some kids going hungry just because some kids are
> overeating," he (Keith Ayoob) said. "A child getting two breakfasts is
> a much easier fix."
> Conclusion: Keith Ayoob falsely thinks that hungry kids are starving.
> Bottom line: Kids missing breakfast though still getting lunch and
> dinner are not starving if they are hungry. Those who are dying from
> anything including starvation are not hungry.
Discussion subject changed to "Don't be an Ayoob; Sign&share this petition to stop the "hunger is starvation" propaganda on 10/28/12" by Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
> "We don't want some kids going hungry just because some kids are
> overeating," he (Keith Ayoob) said. "A child getting two breakfasts is
> a much easier fix."
> Conclusion: Keith Ayoob falsely thinks that hungry kids are starving.
> Bottom line: Kids missing breakfast though still getting lunch and
> dinner are not starving if they are hungry. Those who are dying from
> anything including starvation are not hungry.
Discussion subject changed to "Don't be an Ayoob; Sign&share this petition to stop the "hunger is starvation" propaganda on 10/29/12" by Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
> "We don't want some kids going hungry just because some kids are
> overeating," he (Keith Ayoob) said. "A child getting two breakfasts is
> a much easier fix."
> Conclusion: Keith Ayoob falsely thinks that hungry kids are starving.
> Bottom line: Kids missing breakfast though still getting lunch and
> dinner are not starving if they are hungry. Those who are dying from
> anything including starvation are not hungry.
Discussion subject changed to "Don't be an Ayoob; Sign&share this petition to stop the "hunger is starvation" propaganda on 10/30/12" by Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
> "We don't want some kids going hungry just because some kids are
> overeating," he (Keith Ayoob) said. "A child getting two breakfasts is
> a much easier fix."
> Conclusion: Keith Ayoob falsely thinks that hungry kids are starving.
> Bottom line: Kids missing breakfast though still getting lunch and
> dinner are not starving if they are hungry. Those who are dying from
> anything including starvation are not hungry.
Discussion subject changed to "Don't be an Ayoob; Sign&share this petition to stop the "hunger is starvation" propaganda on 10/31/12" by Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
> "We don't want some kids going hungry just because some kids are
> overeating," he (Keith Ayoob) said. "A child getting two breakfasts is
> a much easier fix."
> Conclusion: Keith Ayoob falsely thinks that hungry kids are starving.
> Bottom line: Kids missing breakfast though still getting lunch and
> dinner are not starving if they are hungry. Those who are dying from
> anything including starvation are not hungry.
> > Keith Ayoob suffers from the terrible delusion that "hunger is
> > starvation" as evident by the following article:
> > http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/health/2012/04/20/school-breakfast-progra... > > ed-for-feeding-kids-twice/
> > "But Keith Ayoob, director of the Rose R. Kennedy Center Nutrition Clinic > > at > > Albert Einstein College of Medicine in New York City, said the programs > > aren¹t the problem.
> > ³There is a mountain of research that shows school breakfasts, and > > particularly breakfast in the classroom, have a positive outcomes,² he > > said, > > describing a drop in truancy, behavior problems and visits to the school > > nurse as well as an improvement in grades. ³School breakfasts are not > > making > > kids overweight. If they¹re eating two breakfasts, parents need to know > > that > > and adjust accordingly at home.²
> > Speaking to the New York Academy of Medicine Thursday, Ayoob defended > > breakfast programs and stressed the importance of parents keeping track of > > what their kids are eating.
> > ³We don¹t want some kids going hungry just because some kids are > > overeating,² > > he said. ³A child getting two breakfasts is a much easier fix.²
> > Conclusion: Keith Ayoob falsely thinks that hungry kids are starving.
My conclusion: Liar Chung did not even read what Ayoob had to say.
> > Bottom line: Kids missing breakfast
Many such kids will be disruptive in classes because of their hunger.
So that those, like Chung, who would deprive them all from breakfasting is trying to destroy schools.
-- "Ignorance is preferable to error, and he is less
remote from the- truth who believes nothing than he who believes what is wrong.
Thomas Jefferson
> I'm an Obsessive Compulsive QUACK, who has been around for
> quite a few years now, and over time (the last 5 years or so) my
> posts have degenerated from once being helpful and
> knowledgeable to now being consumed with religion and what seems a
> paranoid belief in my 2lb diet.
> Very sad to a see me, a once clever man go down the gurgler like
> this,
> but that is unfortunately the nature of my disease -
> schizophrenia and an obsessive compulsive disorder.
"Starvation: The term hunger refers to the symptoms and effects of
starvation. According to the World Health Organization, hunger is the
single gravest threat to the world"
> May [Crackpot's version of] GOD ever so severely curse you and all around
> you to the Nth generation
> [Crackpot's version of] GOD has sent a daughter's ghost to exact vengeance on those who
> falsely accuse her mom and her defenders.
> These accusers should get funeral insurance for their families as they
> start witnessing their members cut down one-by-one.
In an interview at 11Alive's studio in Atlanta, GA, a crackpot
physician
said...
"The ones who disagree with me the most... who are against me
the most, are actual Christians"
'nuff said by the man himself regarding his lone false Biblical
gobbledygook interpretations.
His poor standing with actual Christians is further documented in this
transcript from a video that a crackpot physician posted to
GodTube.com and later deleted.
"Andrew Chung, my name is John Day and I'm the director of security at
First Baptist Church, Woodstock.
Andrew, I need to inform you that you're not allowed to come back to
our campus.
I don't want you to show up this weekend, I don't want you to come
back, okay?
That's the decision we're making today. And you need to know if you do
come back,
we'll remove you from the property and beyond that, if you come back,
I will call the police.
Andrew, lets allow this to end peacefully. Allow it to end right now.
Thank you and have a good day."
The Bible says, "While evildoers and impostors will go from bad to
worse, deceiving and being deceived" 2 Timothy 3:13
And that true Christians will be able to spot an impostor like the
crackpot physician and disagree with him,
be against him and cast him out from amongst them.
This is a description of how the crackpot physician operates in a
nutshell; how he mixes lies with the truth and creates his lone
gobbledygook pseudo-theology
Which evidence and his own testimony clearly shows that is thoroughly
rejected by actual Christians.
1 Corinthians 12:3:
"Therefore I tell you that no one who is speaking by the Spirit of God
says, "Jesus be cursed," and no one can say, "Jesus is Lord," except
by the Holy Spirit"
Regarding the misinterpretation of this Bible verse explained and what
the verse actually means:
Proof that just saying the words "Jesus is Lord" without meaning is
meaningless by an atheist saying "Jesus is Lord" over and over again
without meaning it and without being saved by it:
> This study does exclude those of us who are the LORD's
> who simply **prove** we are born again (John 3:3 & 5) by saying "Jesus
> is LORD" with our mouth (Romans 10:9) unto salvation
Why that being able to say "Jesus is Lord" is not proof of being born
again by an atheist saying it over and over.
> > Only Satan would try to lull people into a false assurance of
> > Salvation in Jesus Christ, by claiming it's summed up in someone's
> > ability to parrot the second half of a Bible verse.
> Only those who work for satan would claim they know what satan would
> do.
Nice try. However, "In order that Satan might not outwit us. For we
are not unaware of his schemes." 2 Corinthians 2:11
"Starvation: The term hunger refers to the symptoms and effects of
starvation. According to the World Health Organization, hunger is the
single gravest threat to the world"
1"Now concerning spiritual gifts, brethren, I do not want you to be
unaware. 2 You know that when you were pagans, you were led astray to
the mute idols, however you were led. 3 Therefore I make known to you
that no one speaking by the Spirit[a] of God says, “Jesus is
accursed”; and no one can say, “Jesus is Lord,” except by the Holy
Spirit[a]”
The cross reference [a] given twice for speaking by the Holy Spirit
is, Acts 2:4:
"All of them were filled with the Holy Spirit and began to speak in
other tongues as the Spirit enabled them."
The topic Paul is addressing in 1 Corinthians 12:3 is, the Holy Spirit
gift of tongues (speaking in other languages).
There was a problem in Corinth where people were speaking in tongues,
in the manner of their former paganism, instead of speaking in tongues
by the Holy Spirit.
This is why when it comes to speaking in tongues before others, Paul
instructs:
" 27 If anyone speaks in a tongue, it should be by two or at the most
three, and each in turn, and one must interpret; 28 but if there is no
interpreter, he must keep silent in the church; and let him speak to
himself and to God" (1 Corinthians 14:27-28)
So, what Paul is saying in 1 Corinthians 12:3 is, that no one speaking
*in tongues* by the Spirit of God says, “Jesus is accursed”; and no
one *while speaking in tongues* can say, “Jesus is Lord,” except by
the Holy Spirit" (emphasis mine).
That's all Paul is addressing. The discerning of whether the speaking
of tongues in public by a person or group of people in unison, is
actually the gift tongues being spoken by way of the Holy Spirit or
not.
I've heard this story from several sources over the years: A man
invited an exchange student from China to a service being held at his
church, where there was a lot of unchecked speaking in tongues going
on. During the service when several people in the congregation started
speaking in tongues, the exchange student got up, ran down the
corridor and bolted out the door. The man followed after the exchange
student and found her in the parking lot shaking and crying. When he
asked her what was wrong, she told him that the people speaking in
tongues were cursing Jesus in her language.
In other words, they were not speaking in tongues by way of the Holy
Spirit.
So once again, this is why Paul said in 1 Corinthians 12:3, "no one
speaking *in tongues* by the Spirit of God says, “Jesus is accursed”;
and no one *while speaking in tongues*, “Jesus is Lord,” can say
except by the Holy Spirit" (emphasis mine).
That's all this verse is about: Spiritual gifts; the Spiritual gift of
speaking in other languages.
Non-christian: "Show me LORD Almighty GOD."
Crackpot: "Jesus is LORD."
Non-christian: "So what?"
Crackpot: "Would not have been able to say that without GOD's help."
Non-christian: "Anyone can say that."
Crackpot: "Ok, go ahead and do it for me."
> This study does exclude those of us who are the LORD's
> who simply **prove** we are born again (John 3:3 & 5) by saying "Jesus
> is LORD" with our mouth (Romans 10:9) unto salvation
Only Satan would try to lull people into a false assurance of
Salvation in Jesus Christ, by claiming it's summed up in someone's
ability to parrot the second half of a Bible verse.
Crackpot responds:
> Only those who work for satan would claim they know what satan would
> do.
Nice try. However, "In order that Satan might not outwit us. For we
are not unaware of his schemes." (2 Corinthians 2:11)
In an interview at 11Alive's studio in Atlanta, GA, a crackpot
physician said...
"The ones who disagree with me the most... who are against me
the most, are actual Christians"
'nuff said by the crackpot himself regarding his lone false and
misleading Biblical gobbledygook interpretations.
--
Hunger is starvation.
"Starvation: The term hunger refers to the symptoms and effects of
starvation. According to the World Health Organization, hunger is the
single gravest threat to the world"
Discussion subject changed to "Don't be an Ayoob; Sign&share this petition to stop the "hunger is starvation" propaganda on 11/01/12" by Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
> "We don't want some kids going hungry just because some kids are
> overeating," he (Keith Ayoob) said. "A child getting two breakfasts is
> a much easier fix."
> Conclusion: Keith Ayoob falsely thinks that hungry kids are starving.
> Bottom line: Kids missing breakfast though still getting lunch and
> dinner are not starving if they are hungry. Those who are dying from
> anything including starvation are not hungry.
"Starvation: The term hunger refers to the symptoms and effects of
starvation. According to the World Health Organization, hunger is the
single gravest threat to the world"
Discussion subject changed to "Don't be an Ayoob; Sign&share this petition to stop the "hunger is starvation" propaganda on 11/02/12" by Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
> "We don't want some kids going hungry just because some kids are
> overeating," he (Keith Ayoob) said. "A child getting two breakfasts is
> a much easier fix."
> Conclusion: Keith Ayoob falsely thinks that hungry kids are starving.
> Bottom line: Kids missing breakfast though still getting lunch and
> dinner are not starving if they are hungry. Those who are dying from
> anything including starvation are not hungry.
Discussion subject changed to "Don't be an Chung, BE AN Ayoob; Sign&share this petition to stop Chung's anti=education propaganda on 11/02/12" by Uergil
> > "We don't want some kids going hungry just because some kids are
> > overeating," he (Keith Ayoob) said. "A child getting two breakfasts is
> > a much easier fix."
> > Conclusion: Keith Ayoob falsely thinks that hungry kids are starving.
Real conclusion, Chung is full of crap re Ayoob.
Keith Ayoob, as an educator, is well aware that children sent to classes without having breakfasted do poorly themselves and disrupt their classes causing others to do poorly too.
> > Bottom line: Kids missing breakfast though still getting lunch and
> > dinner are not starving if they are hungry.
True bottom line: Kids being sent to morning clases without breakfasts do poorly and cause others to do poorly as well, a problem easily solved by assuring that all kids get breakfasts before their morning classes as Keith Ayoob recommends.
If Chung wants those kids to be so hungry, let him prevent them from getting other meaks, but not breakfasts.
> Be hungrier, which really is wonderfully healthier especially for
> diabetics and other heart disease patients:
But is definitely counter-indicated for kids in classes.
-- "Ignorance is preferable to error, and he is less
remote from the- truth who believes nothing than he who believes what is wrong.
Thomas Jefferson
"But Keith Ayoob, director of the Rose R. Kennedy Center Nutrition Clinic at Albert Einstein College of Medicine in New York City, said the programs aren¹t the problem.
³There is a mountain of research that shows school breakfasts, and particularly breakfast in the classroom, have a positive outcomes,² he said, describing a drop in truancy, behavior problems and visits to the school nurse as well as an improvement in grades. ³School breakfasts are not making kids overweight. If they¹re eating two breakfasts, parents need to know that and adjust accordingly at home.²
Speaking to the New York Academy of Medicine Thursday, Ayoob defended breakfast programs and stressed the importance of parents keeping track of what their kids are eating.
³We don¹t want some kids going hungry just because some kids are overeating,² he said. ³A child getting two breakfasts is a much easier fix.² http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/health/2012/04/20/school-breakfast-progra... anned-for-feeding-kids-twice/
> > "We don't want some kids going hungry just because some kids are
> > overeating," he (Keith Ayoob) said. "A child getting two breakfasts is
> > a much easier fix."
> > Conclusion: Keith Ayoob falsely thinks that hungry kids are starving.
WRONG!, Ayoob does not mention "starving" anywhere, but does mention in that article, but cut out by Chung, that kids set to classes with breakfasts do better in classes than those who are without breakfasts.
> > Bottom line: Kids missing breakfast though still getting lunch and
> > dinner are not starving if they are hungry.
But they ARE misbehaving in classes until they get those lunches or dinners. which is that Ayoob makes byt point that CHung carefully avoids considering.
So Chung once again demonstrates his incompetence in reading and understanding anyone who doe not accept his own delusions.
-- "Ignorance is preferable to error, and he is less
remote from the- truth who believes nothing than he who believes what is wrong.
Thomas Jefferson
"Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" slipping further into insanity:
> Markea's ghost will shut that accursed soul up along
> with shutting up all the other accursed souls as she destroys their
> families one by one per command. Vengeance is Mine. I shall
> avenge. -- Dr. Crackpot posing as God.
