As I've stated previously, Ruth Ginsburg is no longer qualified to sit on the SCOTUS. Her mental capacities waning, she now looks to foreign laws to form her opinions rather than the Constitution she has sworn to uphold. Ruth Ginsburg should retire promptly.
U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has left some legal experts wondering whether she has any respect for her country's constitution.
When she was sworn in on August 10, 1993, Ginsburg was administered the judicial oath by then President Bill Clinton. In taking that oath she agreed to "support and defend" the Constitution of the United States in discharging her duties as a member of the nation's highest court.
Last week, during an interview on Egyptian television, Ginsburg complemented that country on its election of lower house members -- but then began chatting about Egypt drafting a new constitution.
"I would not look to the U.S. Constitution if I were drafting a constitution in the year 2012," recommended Justice Ginsburg in the interview captured on MEMRITV (the Middle East Media Research Institute).
She then pointed to the constitutions of South Africa, Canada, and the European Convention on Human Rights -- more liberal documents -- as good examples. "Why not take advantage of what else there is in the world? I'm a very strong believer in listening and learning from others," the justice added.
Not every legal expert agrees with Ginsburg's approach.
"[It] literally undercuts the justice of the United States Supreme Court and the institution of the Supreme Court in the eyes of the people," says Liberty Counsel founder Mat Staver of the justice's remark. "It certainly undermines the confidence of the American people that the justices will actually look to our Constitution to interpret our own laws as opposed to looking to foreign constitutions."
The attorney says "it's absolutely reprehensible and inexcusable" for a Supreme Court justice to disparage America's own constitution.
"We ought to look to that," says Staver, referring to the U.S. Constitution. "It's done us very well -- it's not outdated, it's not antiquated, it's not second to any other constitution in the world. And we ought to look to that as a shining example for others to follow as well."
Ginsburg has stated previously that she takes into account foreign law as well as U.S. law when forming her legal opinions.
> As I've stated previously, Ruth Ginsburg is no longer qualified to sit
> on the SCOTUS.
Yeah, and we certainly respect your dimwitted opinion here...
The Constitution of the United States is crippled with vague language
that only has whatever meaning the currently installed Supreme Court
Justices want it to have. We might as well have the Supreme Court pull
the rules out of their asses rather than pretending they are derived
from an interpretation of this old piece of paper. Perhaps they couold
try interpreting tea leaves to determine what the rules are.
> As I've stated previously, Ruth Ginsburg is no longer qualified to sit
> on the SCOTUS. Her mental capacities waning, she now looks to foreign
> laws to form her opinions rather than the Constitution she has sworn to
> uphold. Ruth Ginsburg should retire promptly.
You got shot down, hard, the first time you posted this idiocy, so why
are you posting it again?
JD
P.S. What the hell does this have to do with Texas poliltics? Or do
you just randomly choose newsgroups to post your garbage to?
> On Feb 8, 10:32=A0am, J <jdyou...@ymail.com> wrote:
>> As I've stated previously, Ruth Ginsburg is no longer qualified to
>> sit on the SCOTUS.
> Yeah, and we certainly respect your dimwitted opinion here...
> The Constitution of the United States is crippled with vague language
> that only has whatever meaning the currently installed Supreme Court
> Justices want it to have. We might as well have the Supreme Court pull
> the rules out of their asses rather than pretending they are derived
> from an interpretation of this old piece of paper.
I thought that that was what the current rightard members are doing...
On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 12:15:08 -0800, Jeanne Douglas wrote:
> On Feb 8, 8:32 am, J <jdyou...@ymail.com> wrote:
>> As I've stated previously, Ruth Ginsburg is no longer qualified to sit
>> on the SCOTUS. Her mental capacities waning, she now looks to foreign
>> laws to form her opinions rather than the Constitution she has sworn to
>> uphold. Ruth Ginsburg should retire promptly.
> You got shot down, hard, the first time you posted this idiocy, so why
> are you posting it again?
> JD
> P.S. What the hell does this have to do with Texas poliltics? Or do
> you just randomly choose newsgroups to post your garbage to?
On Wed, 8 Feb 2012 12:15:08 -0800 (PST), Jeanne Douglas
<hlwdj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Feb 8, 8:32 am, J <jdyou...@ymail.com> wrote:
>> As I've stated previously, Ruth Ginsburg is no longer qualified to sit
>> on the SCOTUS. Her mental capacities waning, she now looks to foreign
>> laws to form her opinions rather than the Constitution she has sworn to
>> uphold. Ruth Ginsburg should retire promptly.
>You got shot down, hard, the first time you posted this idiocy, so why
>are you posting it again?
> On Feb 8, 8:32 am, J<jdyou...@ymail.com> wrote:
>> As I've stated previously, Ruth Ginsburg is no longer qualified to sit
>> on the SCOTUS. Her mental capacities waning, she now looks to foreign
>> laws to form her opinions rather than the Constitution she has sworn to
>> uphold. Ruth Ginsburg should retire promptly.
> You got shot down, hard, the first time you posted this idiocy, so why
> are you posting it again?
Because Mrs. Ginsburg needs to step down, the sooner the better.
> P.S. What the hell does this have to do with Texas poliltics? Or do
> you just randomly choose newsgroups to post your garbage to?
The last time I looked, Texas is still part of the United States.
In article <5cs8uo.uet.1...@news.alt.net>, J <jdyou...@ymail.com> wrote:
> On 2/8/2012 12:15 PM, Jeanne Douglas wrote:
> > On Feb 8, 8:32 am, J<jdyou...@ymail.com> wrote:
> >> As I've stated previously, Ruth Ginsburg is no longer qualified to sit
> >> on the SCOTUS. Her mental capacities waning, she now looks to foreign
> >> laws to form her opinions rather than the Constitution she has sworn to
> >> uphold. Ruth Ginsburg should retire promptly.
> > You got shot down, hard, the first time you posted this idiocy, so why
> > are you posting it again?
> Because Mrs. Ginsburg needs to step down, the sooner the better.
Why? Your attempt at character assassination is not a reason.
> > P.S. What the hell does this have to do with Texas poliltics? Or do
> > you just randomly choose newsgroups to post your garbage to?
> The last time I looked, Texas is still part of the United States.
In article <5cqtkp.u59.1...@news.alt.net>, Jerk-L...@liar.com says...
> As I've stated previously, Ruth Ginsburg is no longer qualified to sit > on the SCOTUS. Her mental capacities waning, she now looks to foreign > laws to form her opinions rather than the Constitution she has sworn to > uphold. Ruth Ginsburg should retire promptly.
And this is because you and your internet lie rag say so?
Justice Ginsburg is as or better qualified to sit on the Supreme Court than any other member of the Supreme Court. You aren't fit to kiss her little toe, "J", and neither are your internet lie rags. Go dream up some more slander, "J".
Modern Christian: Someone who can take time out from
complaining about "welfare mothers popping out babies we
have to feed" to complain about welfare mothers getting
abortions that PREVENT more babies to be raised at public expense.
In article <5cs8uo.uet.1...@news.alt.net>, Jerk-L...@liar.com says...
> On 2/8/2012 12:15 PM, Jeanne Douglas wrote:
> > On Feb 8, 8:32 am, J<Jerk-L...@liar.com> wrote:
> >> As I've stated previously, Ruth Ginsburg is no longer qualified to sit
> >> on the SCOTUS. Her mental capacities waning, she now looks to foreign
> >> laws to form her opinions rather than the Constitution she has sworn to
> >> uphold. Ruth Ginsburg should retire promptly.
Or what, butt hole?
> > You got shot down, hard, the first time you posted this idiocy, so why
> > are you posting it again?
> Because Mrs. Ginsburg needs to step down, the sooner the better.
She isn't going to. Is that a problem with you?
> > P.S. What the hell does this have to do with Texas poliltics? Or do
> > you just randomly choose newsgroups to post your garbage to?
> The last time I looked, Texas is still part of the United States.
Abortion and sterilization, they save the lives, health and futures of women and men alike!
Modern Christian: Someone who can take time out from
complaining about "welfare mothers popping out babies we
have to feed" to complain about welfare mothers getting
abortions that PREVENT more babies to be raised at public expense.
On Thu, 9 Feb 2012 06:22:07 -0600, "W.T.S." <m...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>In article <5cs8uo.uet.1...@news.alt.net>, Jerk-L...@liar.com says...
>> On 2/8/2012 12:15 PM, Jeanne Douglas wrote:
>> > On Feb 8, 8:32 am, J<Jerk-L...@liar.com> wrote:
>> >> As I've stated previously, Ruth Ginsburg is no longer qualified to sit
>> >> on the SCOTUS. Her mental capacities waning, she now looks to foreign
>> >> laws to form her opinions rather than the Constitution she has sworn to
>> >> uphold. Ruth Ginsburg should retire promptly.
>Or what, butt hole?
>> > You got shot down, hard, the first time you posted this idiocy, so why
>> > are you posting it again?
>> Because Mrs. Ginsburg needs to step down, the sooner the better.
>She isn't going to. Is that a problem with you?
Yes, she may support abortions next, and that would be dangerous for human life.
duke, American - American
*****
1 John 3:4-6
4 Everyone who sins breaks the law; in fact,
sin is lawlessness. 5 But you know that he
appeared so that he might take away our sins.
And in him is no sin. 6 No one who lives in
him keeps on sinning. No one who continues to
sin has either seen him or known him. *****
> >> On 2/8/2012 12:15 PM, Jeanne Douglas wrote:
> >> > On Feb 8, 8:32 am, J<Jerk-L...@liar.com> wrote:
> >> >> As I've stated previously, Ruth Ginsburg is no longer qualified to sit
> >> >> on the SCOTUS. Her mental capacities waning, she now looks to foreign
> >> >> laws to form her opinions rather than the Constitution she has sworn to
> >> >> uphold. Ruth Ginsburg should retire promptly.
> >Or what, butt hole?
> >> > You got shot down, hard, the first time you posted this idiocy, so why
> >> > are you posting it again?
> >> Because Mrs. Ginsburg needs to step down, the sooner the better.
> >She isn't going to. Is that a problem with you?
> Yes, she may support abortions next, and that would be dangerous for human life.
Support for abortion preserves human life. Abortion is a basic human and constitutional right. Abortion is common decency. I think Justice Thomas should resign. No one who doesn't support abortion should be allowed on the Supreme Court, only abortion supporters should be allowed on the Supreme Court!
> puke, AmeriKKKan - Liar.
Abortion and sterilization, they save the lives, health and futures of women and men alike!
Modern Christian: Someone who can take time out from
complaining about "welfare mothers popping out babies we
have to feed" to complain about welfare mothers getting
abortions that PREVENT more babies to be raised at public expense.
J <jdyou...@ymail.com> wrote:
> As I've stated previously, Ruth Ginsburg is no longer qualified to sit
> on the SCOTUS. Her mental capacities waning, she now looks to foreign
> laws to form her opinions rather than the Constitution she has sworn to
> uphold. Ruth Ginsburg should retire promptly.
Shouldn't you wait until President Santorum is sworn in* before
pushing for a new Supreme Court appointment?
* I kid! Santorum has a snowball's chance in hell of being elected
President.
>> >> On 2/8/2012 12:15 PM, Jeanne Douglas wrote:
>> >> > On Feb 8, 8:32 am, J<Jerk-L...@liar.com> wrote:
>> >> >> As I've stated previously, Ruth Ginsburg is no longer qualified to sit
>> >> >> on the SCOTUS. Her mental capacities waning, she now looks to foreign
>> >> >> laws to form her opinions rather than the Constitution she has sworn to
>> >> >> uphold. Ruth Ginsburg should retire promptly.
>> >Or what, butt hole?
>> >> > You got shot down, hard, the first time you posted this idiocy, so why
>> >> > are you posting it again?
>> >> Because Mrs. Ginsburg needs to step down, the sooner the better.
>> >She isn't going to. Is that a problem with you?
>> Yes, she may support abortions next, and that would be dangerous for human life.
>Support for abortion preserves human life.
It is 100% murder for one participant. That's right up your alley, wanker.
duke, American - American
*****
1 John 3:4-6
4 Everyone who sins breaks the law; in fact,
sin is lawlessness. 5 But you know that he
appeared so that he might take away our sins.
And in him is no sin. 6 No one who lives in
him keeps on sinning. No one who continues to
sin has either seen him or known him. *****
> >> >> On 2/8/2012 12:15 PM, Jeanne Douglas wrote:
> >> >> > On Feb 8, 8:32 am, J<Jerk-L...@liar.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> As I've stated previously, Ruth Ginsburg is no longer qualified to sit
> >> >> >> on the SCOTUS. Her mental capacities waning, she now looks to foreign
> >> >> >> laws to form her opinions rather than the Constitution she has sworn to
> >> >> >> uphold. Ruth Ginsburg should retire promptly.
> >> >Or what, butt hole?
> >> >> > You got shot down, hard, the first time you posted this idiocy, so why
> >> >> > are you posting it again?
> >> >> Because Mrs. Ginsburg needs to step down, the sooner the better.
> >> >She isn't going to. Is that a problem with you?
> >> Yes, she may support abortions next, and that would be dangerous for human life.
> >Support for abortion preserves human life.
> It is 100% murder for one participant. That's right up your alley, wanker.
No baby involved in any abortion, thus no "murder". Try telling the truth for a change, "duke".
> puke, AmeriKKKan - Liar.
Abortion and sterilization, they save the lives, health and futures of women and men alike!
Modern Christian: Someone who can take time out from
complaining about "welfare mothers popping out babies we
have to feed" to complain about welfare mothers getting
abortions that PREVENT more babies to be raised at public expense.
On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:52:03 -0800, J <jdyou...@ymail.com> wrote:
>On 2/8/2012 12:15 PM, Jeanne Douglas wrote:
>> On Feb 8, 8:32 am, J<jdyou...@ymail.com> wrote:
>>> As I've stated previously, Ruth Ginsburg is no longer qualified to sit
>>> on the SCOTUS. Her mental capacities waning, she now looks to foreign
>>> laws to form her opinions rather than the Constitution she has sworn to
>>> uphold. Ruth Ginsburg should retire promptly.
>> You got shot down, hard, the first time you posted this idiocy, so why
>> are you posting it again?
>Because Mrs. Ginsburg needs to step down, the sooner the better.
The fact that you think she does indicates she almost certainly
doesn't.
>> P.S. What the hell does this have to do with Texas poliltics? Or do
>> you just randomly choose newsgroups to post your garbage to?
>The last time I looked, Texas is still part of the United States.
The last time *we* looked, *you* were still an idiot.
>> As I've stated previously, Ruth Ginsburg is no longer qualified to sit
>> on the SCOTUS. Her mental capacities waning, she now looks to foreign
>> laws to form her opinions rather than the Constitution she has sworn to
>> uphold. Ruth Ginsburg should retire promptly.
>Shouldn't you wait until President Santorum is sworn in* before
>pushing for a new Supreme Court appointment?
>* I kid! Santorum has a snowball's chance in hell of being elected
>President.
We know that, but I suppose a disclaimer was necessary for the
righties. <G>
On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:43:08 -0500, John Baker <nu...@bizniz.net> wrote:
>On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:32:51 -0800, J <jdyou...@ymail.com> wrote:
>>As I've stated previously, Ruth Ginsburg is no longer qualified to sit >>on the SCOTUS.
>And as *we've* stated previously, your opinion isn't worth the Charmin
>it's printed on.
At least the printing is done by the outlet closest to his brain.
--
aa #2278 Never mind "proof." Where is your evidence? BAAWA Chief Assistant to the Assistant Chief Heckler
Fidei defensor (Hon. Antipodean)
The Squeeky Wheel: http://home.comcast.net/~drdonmartin/
>> >> >> On 2/8/2012 12:15 PM, Jeanne Douglas wrote:
>> >> >> > On Feb 8, 8:32 am, J<Jerk-L...@liar.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >> As I've stated previously, Ruth Ginsburg is no longer qualified to sit
>> >> >> >> on the SCOTUS. Her mental capacities waning, she now looks to foreign
>> >> >> >> laws to form her opinions rather than the Constitution she has sworn to
>> >> >> >> uphold. Ruth Ginsburg should retire promptly.
>> >> >Or what, butt hole?
>> >> >> > You got shot down, hard, the first time you posted this idiocy, so why
>> >> >> > are you posting it again?
>> >> >> Because Mrs. Ginsburg needs to step down, the sooner the better.
>> >> >She isn't going to. Is that a problem with you?
>> >> Yes, she may support abortions next, and that would be dangerous for human life.
>> >Support for abortion preserves human life.
>> It is 100% murder for one participant. That's right up your alley, wanker.
>No baby involved in any abortion, thus no "murder". Try telling the >truth for a change, "duke".
You're a baby killer, wanker.
duke, American - American
*****
1 John 3:4-6
4 Everyone who sins breaks the law; in fact,
sin is lawlessness. 5 But you know that he
appeared so that he might take away our sins.
And in him is no sin. 6 No one who lives in
him keeps on sinning. No one who continues to
sin has either seen him or known him. *****
> >> >> >> On 2/8/2012 12:15 PM, Jeanne Douglas wrote:
> >> >> >> > On Feb 8, 8:32 am, J<Jerk-L...@liar.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> As I've stated previously, Ruth Ginsburg is no longer qualified to sit
> >> >> >> >> on the SCOTUS. Her mental capacities waning, she now looks to foreign
> >> >> >> >> laws to form her opinions rather than the Constitution she has sworn to
> >> >> >> >> uphold. Ruth Ginsburg should retire promptly.
> >> >> >Or what, butt hole?
> >> >> >> > You got shot down, hard, the first time you posted this idiocy, so why
> >> >> >> > are you posting it again?
> >> >> >> Because Mrs. Ginsburg needs to step down, the sooner the better.
> >> >> >She isn't going to. Is that a problem with you?
> >> >> Yes, she may support abortions next, and that would be dangerous for human life.
> >> >Support for abortion preserves human life.
> >> It is 100% murder for one participant. That's right up your alley, wanker.
> >No baby involved in any abortion, thus no "murder". Try telling the > >truth for a change, "duke".
> You're a baby killer, wanker.
No baby is involved in any abortion.
Now, go wash your mouth out with soap until you stop lying, "duke".
> puke, AmeriKKKan - Liar.
Abortion and sterilization, they save the lives, health and futures of women and men alike!
Modern Christian: Someone who can take time out from
complaining about "welfare mothers popping out babies we
have to feed" to complain about welfare mothers getting
abortions that PREVENT more babies to be raised at public expense.
