On Oct 26, 2:40 pm, BroilJAB <DesignDen
...@wmconnect.com> wrote:
> In the 3rd edition of ORIGIN are found astounding
> blunders by Charles Darwin who said that the
> (forgery) embryo's of Ernst Haeckel were 'the best
> possible evidence for Evolution'. In fact, those same
> Embryo Diagrams were exposed as complete frauds.
> Dr.Gould admitted this in his 1977 book ONTOGENY.
> But the Pres of the Nat'l Science Foundation himself
> published those (long discredited) hoaxes in The Cell.
> Von Braun concluded, "Evolution is systemic fraud."
(1) Akin is *not* yet a senator, but a member of the House of
Representatives. If polls are anything to judge by, he never *will*
be a senator, as Claire McCaskill has a solid lead.
(2) Evolution is *not* dependent upon Haeckel's embryo drawings.
Darwin published _On the Origin of Species_ in 1859. Haeckel didn't
publish his embryo drawings until 1866.
(3) Even though Haeckel did fudge his drawings, comparing of embryos
is a perfectly valid avenue of study.
(4) Haeckel wasn't a Darwinian, but a Lamarckian.
(5) Stop posting the same tired, oft-refuted shit over and over and
over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over
and over and over and over and over and over and over and
over. No matter how many times you post it, it still isn't factual.
Brenda Nelson, A.A.#34 and A+ atheist
BAAWA Knight of the Golden Litterbox
EAC Professor of Feline Thermometrics and Cat-Herding
skyeyes nine at cox dot net OR
skyeyes nine at yahoo dot com
