Re: HEY HEY YOU SAD SACK OF LOSERS AUS.TV

[Graham Cooper]

On Aug 23, 12:38 pm, Sylvia Else <syl...@not.at.this.address> wrote:
> On 23/08/2012 12:23 PM, Graham Cooper wrote:
>
>
> > On Aug 23, 9:55 am, Sylvia Else <syl...@not.at.this.address> wrote:
> >> On 23/08/2012 5:03 AM, Graham Cooper wrote:
>
> >>> On Aug 22, 11:55 am, Sylvia Else <syl...@not.at.this.address> wrote:
> >>>> On 21/08/2012 9:17 PM, Sylvia Else wrote:
>
> >>>>> On 21/08/2012 11:29 AM, Graham Cooper wrote:
> >>>>>> 21 Aug 2012    TELEGRAPHIC TRANSFER $4,973.36
>
> >>>>>> What are you all up to for the rest of today?
>
> >>>>>> BWAHAHAHAHAHA!
>
> >>>>>>www.CAMGIRLS.com
>
> >>>>> So, it's in your bank account now? You've checked?
>
> >>>>> Sylvia.
>
> >>>> Well?
>
> >>> What format answer do you want?
>
> >>> 20 text confirmations.
>
> >>> 2 bank account posts.
>
> >>> 2 photos with me holding a $3000 roll of $50 notes.
>
> >>> You want video coverage of the telegraphic transfer with live
> >>> crossover to Westpac International Transactions?
>
> >>> Herc
>
> >> I want you to look at your bank account balance (presumably online), and
> >> confirm that there really is that amount of money there available for
> >> you to obtain, in cash, on demand, should you want to.
>
> >> Sylvia.
>
> > And I want you to look at the $3000 roll of $50 notes in my hand and
> > read the 20 times I've already answered that question and posted line
> > by line account of my bank statement for you.
>
> > What are you on about Sylvia?
>
> > Specify EXACTLY what you consider proof I make that much.
>
> I haven't asked for any proof. I've just asked you to check that your
> bank balance is in accord with the alleged telegraphic transfer.
>
>
>
> > Here's $1000 in Inverters and $1400 in batteries.
>
> >http://pro1og.com/piece_of_sht.jpg
>
> They appear to be in a shed like the one you're apparently living in.
>
> A person who's living in a shed could probably, over a period of time,
> even if living on a disability pension, find enough money to buy
> inverters and batteries. Of course doing the latter might be a strong
> contributor to the need to live in a shed.
>
> Sylvia.


2 more batteries next week! that's a $3000 battery stack.

How are they going to charge them?

I've got bank wires for CamGirls.com earnings for 2 years,

you skeptics are outright liars and cons.

Only a fool would think this is random water vapour...

http://pro1og.com/REAL-ANGEL.png

AND THEN... CARRY ON CONDEMNING THE CLAIMANT FOR THINKING ITS NOT A
TYPICAL CLOUD!

THIS WAS TAKEN A WEEK AFTER BOBC asked for a cloud in the shape of an
AK47

http://pro1og.com/AK47.png

IN THE SAME PHOTO!!!!

1000 SKEPTICS.... WATER VAPOUR KIDS GAMES!


You're all either full of sh%t stupid or stupid as one.

THE GRAY
KINGS BEACH

[Sylvia Else]

You know, you could just look at your bank balance, make the necessary
confirmation, and then say so. It's strange that instead you go off at a
complete tangent. Does one part of you know something that another part
of you wants to keep hidden from yourself?

Sylvia.

[Graham Cooper]

I've looked at it 10 times this morning already.

I've told you 10 times already the money is in.

I've copied and pasted the telegraphic transfers onto usenet for you.

I took photos of the cash taken from the ATM and uploaded them.

Of all the lame brain tangents you've gone on this one is the lamest
brainlessness.

Herc

[Calvin Ramsey]

Graham Cooper <graham...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've copied and pasted the telegraphic transfers onto usenet for you.
>
> I took photos of the cash taken from the ATM and uploaded them.
>
> Of all the lame brain tangents you've gone on this one is the lamest
> brainlessness.
>
> Herc

Is it too modern to notice that there is nothing [in the ten
commandments] about the protection of children from cruelty, nothing
about rape, nothing about slavery, and nothing about genocide? Or is it
too exactingly “in context” to notice that some of these very offenses
are about to be positively recommended?

[Graham Cooper]

On Aug 23, 1:46 pm, Calvin Ramsey <calvinram...@live.com> wrote:

love thy neighbour, do unto others...

you have the right to remain silent... temporarily.

"you can tell the judge instead of the policeman if you prefer!"

you have to right to know what the arrest charge is before you are
detained...

unless you are behaving in an odd manner...

atleast religion is upfront about it's rules.

Herc

[Graham Cooper]

On Aug 23, 1:46 pm, Calvin Ramsey <calvinram...@live.com> wrote:

[Sylvia Else]

I've seen no such posting, and even now you're not now telling me it's
in your account, you're just telling me you've told me it's in your account.

No equivocation. Straight yes or no. Does your bank account now show
that it contains that money?

Sylvia.

[Graham Cooper]

Then bank transfer went into my account.

I withdrew most of it in cash.

Duh!

The bank balance is in accord with the telegraphic transfer.

Herc
--
www.CAMGIRLS.com
CURRENT BOOTY/WEEK = $5000!

[Sylvia Else]

Why would you want to withdraw nearly $5,000 in cash?

Sylvia.

[George]

Because he can't handle the technology of a Cashflow card would be my bet.
And he meant to type $5 as he didn't want to max out his savings but as
he's done nothing but lie in here he wacked a couple of noughts on

[Graham Cooper]

On Aug 25, 6:02 am, George <gbl...@hnpl.net> wrote:
> > Why would you want to withdraw nearly $5,000 in cash?
>
> > Sylvia.
>
> Because he can't handle the technology of a Cashflow card would be my bet.

meanwhile every item you have bought and every location you have
shopped at is all available on database.

> And he meant to type $5 as he didn't want to max out his savings but as
> he's done nothing but lie in here he wacked a couple of noughts on

George refuses to actually click any photos I upload of $3000 rolls or
cloud depictions of genies and such.

even by Skeptic standards he's a ruse.

Herc

[Sylvia Else]

Given the effectivenesss of colour scanners and copiers, and the
limitations of photographs, I wouldn't think it that difficult to fake a
$3000 roll, so uploads wouldn't prove anything.

Your cloud pictures are never compelling. After looking at a few, why
one would bother?

Sylvia.

[Graham Cooper]

Your 2 consecutive, mutually supportive, statements sound
substantiated.

Shame every media company in the world disagrees with you!

http://pro1og.com/REAL-ANGEL.png
http://pro1og.com/LevitatingVirgin.jpg


The ONLY people denying these are obviously not ordinary clouds are
you half dozen remaining skeptic motley crew! BWAHAHA!

CLOCKY: Tell me about my friends funeral.

HERC: "Collecting DNA samples for evidence."

CLOCKY: They were talking about doing that to check if he was the
biological father of one of the family to see who would get the
inheritance.

BRUCE: a short guy!

CLOCKY: YES BRUCE! BRUCE! BRUCE! BRUCE WAS RIGHT, HERC WAS WRONG!

CLOCKY: HERC IS LYING! BRUCE WAS A BETTER PSYCHIC!

Herc

[Zacharias Mulletstein]

Graham Cooper <graham...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> BRUCE: a short guy!
>
> CLOCKY: YES BRUCE! BRUCE! BRUCE! BRUCE WAS RIGHT, HERC WAS WRONG!
>
> CLOCKY: HERC IS LYING! BRUCE WAS A BETTER PSYCHIC!
>
> Herc

You were born an atheist. You probably don't remember - but you probably
do remember being taught your particular religion, be it by a parent,
clergy-person, friend, or the old lady down the street who babysat you
Friday nights. The one you were taught was most likely the one you
adopted.

When I speak of atheists here, I do it generally. Surely, some atheists
just don't get religion and never really thought about it, and some
others came to atheism fallaciously, but that's a minority. Most
atheists are thinkers and questioners, who care deeply about the world
and the human beings around them. We atheists don't want everyone else
to be wrong; although some of us care more about what people think than
others do.

Atheists understand the subtleties of respect. A difference lies between
respecting a belief, respecting a person, and respecting a person's
feelings. In order to be respectful, you don't have to respect all
three.

If we disrespect a person's beliefs, we shouldn't disrespect their
feelings, even if they say things that aren't true. They're incorrect
about some things for a reason, surely, and don't deserve to have hot
coffee or bad names thrown at them. Nor do they deserve to be silenced -
everyone deserves a forum in which to speak. People make honest
mistakes. The only way to find out what's correct or incorrect is to
allow fair discussion.

Many atheists don't respect religion. They think, for multiple reasons,
that religiosity contains definite falsehoods, which is why they don't
believe in it themselves. That doesn't mean, however, that they
disrespect religious people; at least, not enough to do any harm. Dialog
can be frustrating sometimes, though.

There's nothing wrong with saying, "I don't believe you. I think you're
wrong, and I think you should change your mind, for these reasons." As
long as it's said without badgering someone, there's nothing offensive
about it at all.

[Sylvia Else]

On 25/08/2012 10:12 AM, Graham Cooper wrote:
> On Aug 25, 10:01 am, Sylvia Else <syl...@not.at.this.address> wrote:
>> On 25/08/2012 8:59 AM, Graham Cooper wrote:
>>
>> Given the effectivenesss of colour scanners and copiers, and the
>> limitations of photographs, I wouldn't think it that difficult to fake a
>> $3000 roll, so uploads wouldn't prove anything.
>>
>> Your cloud pictures are never compelling. After looking at a few, why
>> one would bother?
>>
>> Sylvia.
>
> Your 2 consecutive, mutually supportive, statements sound
> substantiated.

The first seems reasonably self evident.

The second, which is not related to the first as far as I can see, has
to be construed as a statement that *I* have never found those that I've
seen to be compelling. Since whether something is compelling is
ultimately a subjective judgement, I cannot prove my statement. You'll
either have to accept it as true, or assume that I'm lying.

>
> Shame every media company in the world disagrees with you!
>
> http://pro1og.com/REAL-ANGEL.png
> http://pro1og.com/LevitatingVirgin.jpg

"Every"?

Is there a single example of a media company agreeing with your position
on these clouds?

>
> CLOCKY: Tell me about my friends funeral.
>
> HERC: "Collecting DNA samples for evidence."
>
> CLOCKY: They were talking about doing that to check if he was the
> biological father of one of the family to see who would get the
> inheritance.
>
> BRUCE: a short guy!
>
> CLOCKY: YES BRUCE! BRUCE! BRUCE! BRUCE WAS RIGHT, HERC WAS WRONG!
>
> CLOCKY: HERC IS LYING! BRUCE WAS A BETTER PSYCHIC!
>
> Herc
>

I have no idea what that's meant to be evidence of.

Sylvia.

[Graham Cooper]

On Aug 25, 10:54 am, Sylvia Else <syl...@not.at.this.address> wrote:
>
> >> Your cloud pictures are never compelling. After looking at a few, why
> >> one would bother?
>
> >> Sylvia.
>
> > Your 2 consecutive, mutually supportive, statements sound
> > substantiated.
>
> The first seems reasonably self evident.

[1] Your cloud pictures are never compelling.

[2] After looking at a few, why one would bother?

> >http://pro1og.com/REAL-ANGEL.png
> >http://pro1og.com/LevitatingVirgin.jpg
>
> "Every"?
>
> Is there a single example of a media company agreeing with your position
> on these clouds?
>

All of them that I've sent samples to.

As I said James Randi never knocks religion since seeing them.

their NEW stance is to USE religion to be critical of, not to admonish
it!

I emailed CMC on Tuesday on police misconduct, CC'd a dozen Aus media
outlets,

front page of the Courier Mail on Wednesday was:

CMC FINDS FAULT BUT NO SMOKING GUN.

and WE JUST WANT DAM ANSWERS.

DAM was in orange and my email damned all Aus media to hell (the day
before)!!

Herc

[Fred Nurk]

On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 18:04:11 -0700 (PDT), Graham Cooper
<graham...@gmail.com> wrote:

>All of them that I've sent samples to.
>
>As I said James Randi never knocks religion since seeing them.
>
>their NEW stance is to USE religion to be critical of, not to admonish
>it!
>
>I emailed CMC on Tuesday on police misconduct, CC'd a dozen Aus media
>outlets,
>
>front page of the Courier Mail on Wednesday was:
>
>CMC FINDS FAULT BUT NO SMOKING GUN.
>
>and WE JUST WANT DAM ANSWERS.
>
>DAM was in orange and my email damned all Aus media to hell (the day
>before)!!
>
>Herc

Your delusions are becoming more psychotic than ever - you really do
need help.

[Graham Cooper]

On Aug 25, 3:50 pm, Fred Nurk <frednurk...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Your delusions are becoming more psychotic than ever - you really do
> need help.

I emailed to CMC and Courier Mail on Tuesday.

The Courier Mail on Wednesday top story was

CMC FINDS FAULT BUT NO SMOKING GUN

and

WE JUST WANT DAM ANSWERS

***

Just because YOU don't see the connection doesn't mean it isn't there!

Herc

[Fred Nurk]

You sad deluded fool.

[Graham Cooper]

On Aug 25, 5:35 pm, Fred Nurk <frednurk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 23:26:27 -0700 (PDT), Graham Cooper
>

> <grahamcoop...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Aug 25, 3:50 pm, Fred Nurk <frednurk...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> Your delusions are becoming more psychotic than ever - you really do
> >> need help.
>
> >I emailed to CMC and Courier Mail on Tuesday.
>
> >The Courier Mail on Wednesday top story was
>
> >CMC FINDS FAULT BUT NO SMOKING GUN
>
> >and
>
> >WE JUST WANT DAM ANSWERS
>
> >***
>
> >Just because YOU don't see the connection doesn't mean it isn't there!
>
> You sad deluded fool.

only for reading your posts Fred.

Herc

[BDK]

In article <edeee160-bb43-45ec-9aa6-2aec440d2e15
@ou2g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>, graham...@gmail.com says...

Nobody sees any connection but you. Because you're insane. Simple as
that.

--
BDK- Head FUD-Master Blaster. Friend to all kOOkbashers.

[Patrick]

BDK <Con...@Worldcontrol.com> wrote:
> >
> > Just because YOU don't see the connection doesn't mean it isn't there!
> >
> > Herc
>
> Nobody sees any connection but you. Because you're insane. Simple as
> that.
>

If religious instruction were not allowed until the child had attained
the age of reason, we would be living in a quite different world.

A better one!

[Graham Cooper]

On Aug 26, 1:33 am, BDK <Cont...@Worldcontrol.com> wrote:
> In article <edeee160-bb43-45ec-9aa6-2aec440d2e15

> @ou2g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>, grahamcoop...@gmail.com says...

>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Aug 25, 3:50 pm, Fred Nurk <frednurk...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Your delusions are becoming more psychotic than ever - you really do
> > > need help.
>
> > I emailed to CMC and Courier Mail on Tuesday.
>
> > The Courier Mail on Wednesday top story was
>
> > CMC FINDS FAULT BUT NO SMOKING GUN
>
> > and
>
> > WE JUST WANT DAM ANSWERS
>
> > ***
>
> > Just because YOU don't see the connection doesn't mean it isn't there!
>
> > Herc
>
> Nobody sees any connection but you. Because you're insane. Simple as
> that.

You don't see a connection to an Australian Newspaper because you're
in USA and a lazy ass.

Simple as that.

Herc

[Graham Cooper]

On Aug 26, 2:27 am, "Patrick" <barker...@erinot.com> wrote:

You have no sense of reason!

You bork at all things not allowed by your TV.

http://pro1og.com/REAL-ANGEL.png
http://pro1og.com/LevitatingVirgin.jpg

You (1000s of Skeptics/Atheists) have swamped all the religious
newsgroups and are foul mouthed in every thread!


Herc

[George]

Decoder ring time

[Graham Cooper]

> > Simple as that.
>
> Decoder ring time

You (1000s of Skeptics/Atheists) have swamped all the religious
newsgroups and are foul mouthed in every thread!

Fix that little bigotry problem you Atheists all have and maybe
I'll have somewhere else to post George!

Herc

[George]

Promises...
You -could- go back into psychiatric care and that would solve the problem

[Clocky]

Just because you are the only person that sees a connection doesn't mean
it's there.

[Graham Cooper]

Atheist Bigot!

[BDK]

In article <10067572-68ea-4ee8-8f45-2a0c64f25820
@j2g2000pbg.googlegroups.com>, graham...@gmail.com says...

Are you still jabbering about the hockey stick "Gray" nonsense?

[BruceS]

Incipient psychotic episode. HTH