Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Western art worth nothing w/o nudity, violence & sex

0 views
Skip to first unread message

yliu...@yahoo.com

unread,
Dec 26, 2000, 6:41:35 PM12/26/00
to
Western Art = Pornographic, Let’s cover them all up.

Western art is full of pornographic and many famous paintings consist
of sick thought. In the name of revealing the beauty of body and
artistic talent, many western artists use art to expose human sexual
organs and erotica fantasy.

In a university textbook, the ninth edition of “ART through the Ages –
II Renaissance and the Modern Art”, there are as many as 63 paintings
and sculptures displaying violence, nudity, and even sexual fantasy
with animals and children.

16-12. Donatello, David, c 1428-1432
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Penis reveal, XXX hard porn.

16-56. Antonio Pollaiuolo, Hercules and Deianira, c. 1470, P620
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Animal sex and violence, XXXX rated hard porn.

16-55 Antonio Pollaiuolo, Battle of the ten Nudes, c. 1465 P.619
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Violence and Penis reveal, XXXX rated hard porn

16-60 Sandro Botticelli, The Birth of Venus, c 1482, P. 624
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Nipple exposed, XX rated Soft porn.

16-61 Luca Signorelli, The Damned Cast into Hell, 1499-1504 Fresco. San
Brizio Chapel
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Violence and Penis reveal, XXXX rated hard porn.

17-17 Raphael, Galatea, 1513. Fresco. Villa Farnesina, Rome. P. 648
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Animal sex, Nipple exposed. XXXX hard porn.

17-35 Michelangelo, The last judgment, fresco on the alarwall of the
Sistine Chapel
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Violence, rape, penis exposed. XXXX hard porn.

17-38 Correggio, Jupiter and Io. c. 1532 P. 667
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Animal sex, XXXX hard porn.

17-42 Bronzino, Venus, Cupid, Folly, and Time, c 1546 P. 670
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Using cupid as to expose children sex. XXXXX hard
porn.

17-46 Giovanni Da Vologna, Rape of the Sabine Women, c 1583 P. 673
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Rape scene, XXXX hard porn.

17-58 giovanni Bellini, the Feast of the Gods, 1514. P.682
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Nipple exposed and suggestion of animal sex, XXX
Hard Porn.

19-40 Peter Paul Rubens, the Rape of the Daughters of Leucippus, 1617,
P. 782
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Rape scene and nipple exposed, XXX hard Porn.

Too much to be listed and too sick for anyone to watch these kinds of
so-called art-works to be displaced in textbook or in museum. In fact,
it is far more dangerous for the public because these kinds of artwork
were exposed to children and young people in textbook and in museum.
Does western art worth anything without nudity, sex and violence? I
think so if the all these pornographic art can be eliminated like
eliminating the small box virus. It might take time to destroy every
single copy of them, but it is far more easier than sending a man to
Mar. If Little Bush is truly a man of God, he should launch a war
against pornographic art once he came to power.


Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/

aryan...@my-deja.com

unread,
Dec 26, 2000, 6:52:05 PM12/26/00
to
In article <92babf$5o5$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>,

yliu...@yahoo.com wrote:
> Western Art = Pornographic, Let’s cover them all up.
>
> Western art is full of pornographic and many famous paintings consist
> of sick thought. In the name of revealing the beauty of body and
> artistic talent, many western artists use art to expose human sexual
> organs and erotica fantasy.
>


------> The fault does not lie with the artists -- its the sick people
who patronise such sickness and aid in spreading it by packging it as
some art who are to be blamed -- as long as the world exists sick minds
will exist too -- but it is the legitimization of such sick illegitimacy
by the media which spreads the sickness around and makes it endemic and
endangers the sanity in the society ---


--
Conserve Nature
The Best Teacher
Preserve Culture
For Better Future

Darkfire

unread,
Dec 26, 2000, 7:10:49 PM12/26/00
to
In article <92babf$5o5$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>,
yliu...@yahoo.com wrote:
> Western Art = Pornographic, Let’s cover them all up.
----------------------------------------------------------------

Given that the Koran is full pornographic material regarding "sex with
virgins in heaven" and "sex with small boys", I think you should be more
concerned with telling Saddam to ban the Koran - and the hadiths which
give detailed instructions on how to pee.

BTW, the rest of the world appreciates the beauty of women's bodies...
----------------------------------------------------------------

sachar...@my-deja.com

unread,
Dec 26, 2000, 7:10:55 PM12/26/00
to
Dear Fellow,


There is nothing in the Western art that is offensive. But the
hypocrites who call it offensive are the ones who need to be "covered
up".
Just look at the Islamic Artwork. They are obsessed with camels and
that too with camel's ass. As such every islamic artwork shows a camel
with its ass in 101 different positions. THAT is offensive.
But to a muslim , yaa laahee, it is aaallaaahh's work.


In article <92babf$5o5$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>,
yliu...@yahoo.com wrote:

Henry

unread,
Dec 26, 2000, 11:08:05 PM12/26/00
to
yliu...@yahoo.com wrote:

>were exposed to children and young people in textbook and in museum.
>Does western art worth anything without nudity, sex and violence? I
>think so if the all these pornographic art can be eliminated like
>eliminating the small box virus. It might take time to destroy every
>single copy of them, but it is far more easier than sending a man to
>Mar. If Little Bush is truly a man of God, he should launch a war
>against pornographic art once he came to power.
>
>
>Sent via Deja.com
>http://www.deja.com/

Most people outside of the United States do not view nudity as
pornography. Only in America is nudity equated with pornography.

Perhaps you should make all countries little Americas. Then 2/3 of
all the worlds marriages will end in divorce.

Alden.Charles

unread,
Dec 26, 2000, 10:39:36 PM12/26/00
to

>yliu...@yahoo.com wrote:
>

>>Does western art worth anything . . .
>>I think so if the all these pornographic art can be eliminated. . .

Oh swell, now we have a Mr. Liu holding forth about how paintings and
sculptures of the human body must be searched out and eradicated in the
decadent west. And this posted to, among other places, soc.culture.indian
- as in home of the Kama Sutra and famous erotic *temple* sculpture.

There is a place for this smug, self-righteous, sneering - and please keep
it there, on the opposite side of the planet from America, in your
self-critical Maoist "struggle groups" as you strive to achieve correct
thought.

The Ghost In The Machine

unread,
Dec 27, 2000, 12:03:15 PM12/27/00
to
In soc.women, yliu...@yahoo.com
<yliu...@yahoo.com>
wrote
on Tue, 26 Dec 2000 23:41:35 GMT
<92babf$5o5$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>:

>Western Art = Pornographic, Let’s cover them all up.
>
>Western art is full of pornographic and many famous paintings consist
>of sick thought. In the name of revealing the beauty of body and
>artistic talent, many western artists use art to expose human sexual
>organs and erotica fantasy.
>
>In a university textbook, the ninth edition of “ART through the Ages –
>II Renaissance and the Modern Art”, there are as many as 63 paintings
>and sculptures displaying violence, nudity, and even sexual fantasy
>with animals and children.

Oh no, not that! Anything but that!

Next you'll be saying that the Mona Lisa's secretive smile is
because her one hand is doing digusting things underneath that dress....

[rest snipped because it's far too silly]

--
#191, ew...@aimnet.com -- Alarm! Alarm! Imminent demise of art detected!
Alarm! Alarm...oh, wait, it's a troll; never mind.
up 90 days, 10:08, running Linux.

spe...@my-deja.com

unread,
Dec 27, 2000, 12:55:44 PM12/27/00
to
Has the intellectual level of usenet fallen this low that no one is
capable of recognizing simple sarcasm? Has the blunt force attack
become so common that toungue-in-cheek goes; vroooooooom! (insert hand
flying over head gesture)


> In soc.women, yliu...@yahoo.com
> <yliu...@yahoo.com>
> wrote
> on Tue, 26 Dec 2000 23:41:35 GMT
> <92babf$5o5$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>:
> >Western Art = Pornographic, Let’s cover them all up.
> >
> >Western art is full of pornographic and many famous paintings consist
> >of sick thought. In the name of revealing the beauty of body and
> >artistic talent, many western artists use art to expose human sexual
> >organs and erotica fantasy.
> >
> >In a university textbook, the ninth edition of “ART through the
Ages –
> >II Renaissance and the Modern Art”, there are as many as 63 paintings
> >and sculptures displaying violence, nudity, and even sexual fantasy
> >with animals and children.
>
> Oh no, not that! Anything but that!
>
> Next you'll be saying that the Mona Lisa's secretive smile is
> because her one hand is doing digusting things underneath that
dress....

Rune Børsjø

unread,
Dec 27, 2000, 7:06:04 PM12/27/00
to
>Western Art = Pornographic, Let’s cover them all up.

All of a sudden I get the feeling you're not a "westerner"

Ever hear of a little thing called fascism? It dictates that if we are
stronger than you, and don't like you, for whatever reason, we can do
what we want.

I strongly suspect, that if our positions were reversed, and countries
such as yours, had any significant power, the Nazi holocaust would be
a mere footnote in history.
--


Useful Phrases to Know when Traveling in The Middle East:
Akbar khali-kili haftir loftan - Thank you for showing me your marvelous gun

kirstinn

unread,
Dec 28, 2000, 7:20:24 PM12/28/00
to
In article <92daes$jir$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>,

spe...@my-deja.com wrote:
> Has the intellectual level of usenet fallen this low that no one is
> capable of recognizing simple sarcasm? Has the blunt force attack
> become so common that toungue-in-cheek goes; vroooooooom! (insert hand
> flying over head gesture)

Yes.

--
Kirstin Nicklaus (kirs...@my-deja.com) EAC, BWWLDAB chapter
Whenever a politician or a business has no justification for
their actions, they say it's either to avoid raising prices,
or they're doing it to protect the children.

The Ghost In The Machine

unread,
Dec 31, 2000, 2:33:10 PM12/31/00
to
In soc.women, spe...@my-deja.com
<spe...@my-deja.com>
wrote
on Wed, 27 Dec 2000 17:55:44 GMT
<92daes$jir$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>:

>Has the intellectual level of usenet fallen this low that no one is
>capable of recognizing simple sarcasm? Has the blunt force attack
>become so common that toungue-in-cheek goes; vroooooooom! (insert hand
>flying over head gesture)

You thought I was serious? :-)

>
>
>> In soc.women, yliu...@yahoo.com
>> <yliu...@yahoo.com>
>> wrote
>> on Tue, 26 Dec 2000 23:41:35 GMT
>> <92babf$5o5$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>:
>> >Western Art = Pornographic, Let’s cover them all up.
>> >
>> >Western art is full of pornographic and many famous paintings consist
>> >of sick thought. In the name of revealing the beauty of body and
>> >artistic talent, many western artists use art to expose human sexual
>> >organs and erotica fantasy.
>> >
>> >In a university textbook, the ninth edition of “ART through the
>Ages –
>> >II Renaissance and the Modern Art”, there are as many as 63 paintings
>> >and sculptures displaying violence, nudity, and even sexual fantasy
>> >with animals and children.
>>
>> Oh no, not that! Anything but that!
>>
>> Next you'll be saying that the Mona Lisa's secretive smile is
>> because her one hand is doing digusting things underneath that
>dress....

Oops, forgot the smiley....sorry if that confused anyone. :-)

[.sigsnip]

--
ew...@aimnet.com -- insert random confusion here
up 92 days, 20:35, running Linux.

0 new messages