>>On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 10:12:18 -0400, raven1
>><quoththera...@nevermore.com> wrote:
>>>And you were wrong, as the article I posted clearly demonstrates by
>>>presenting the very things you deny exist.
>>Nope Birdman, your article demonstrates nothing.
>>"Scientists who go about teaching that evolution is a fact of life are
>>great con-men, And the story they are telling may be the GREATEST HOAX
>>EVER." -- Dr.T.N.Tahmisian, Atomic Energy Commission
>Not a biologist, so his opinion is of no import.
>>"We must concede that there are presently no detailed Darwinian
>>accounts of the evolution of any biochemical or cellular system, only
>>a variety of wishful speculations."
>True, but misleading. The exact details of how specific systems
>evolved are not known at this time. So what?
>> -- Franklin Harold, Emeritus
>>Professor of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology at Colorado State
>>University, in an Oxford University Press text.
The PBS show "What Darwin Never Knew." is worth watching even if you
do know the answers.
The application of evolutionary theory does pretty much what might be
expected. It works and sometime produces results that can't be fully
understood and are totally un human.
On Sun, 21 Oct 2012 10:35:18 -0400, raven1 squawked:
>Not a biologist, so his opinion is of no import.
Wrong. I decide what's important, get it? Or are you too dense to even
grasp the obvious.
>>"We must concede that there are presently no detailed Darwinian
>>accounts of the evolution of any biochemical or cellular system, only
>>a variety of wishful speculations."
>True, but misleading. The exact details of how specific systems
>evolved are not known at this time. So what?
Which means ET is a blind belief that has nothing to with science. As
long as we are clear on that, Birdman.
"New species usually appear in the fossil record suddenly, not
connected with their ancestors by a series of intermediates."
--Eminent evolutionary biologist Ernst Mayr
Science now know that many of the pillars of the Darwinian theory are
either false or misleading. Yet biology texts continue to present them
as factual evidence of Evolution. What does this imply about their
scientific standards? - Jonathan Wells
Krishna says:
The living entities in this conditioned world are My eternal
fragmental parts. Due to conditioned life, they are struggling very
hard with the six senses, which include the mind. (Bg. 15.7)
The living entity in the material world carries his different
conceptions of life from one body to another as the air carries
aromas. Thus he takes one kind of body and again quits it to take
another. (Bg. 15.8)
The living entity, thus taking another gross body, obtains a certain
type of ear, eye, tongue, nose and sense of touch, which are grouped
about the mind. He thus enjoys a particular set of sense objects. (Bg.
15.9)
The foolish cannot understand how a living entity can quit his body,
nor can they understand what sort of body he enjoys under the spell of
the modes of nature. But one whose eyes are trained in knowledge can
see all this. (Bg. 15.10)
The endeavoring transcendentalists who are situated in
self-realization can see all this clearly. But those whose minds are
not developed and who are not situated in self-realization cannot see
what is taking place, though they may try to. (Bg. 15.11)
> On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 05:55:58 +0000 (UTC), Constance Boring kept
> knoring shrilly:
>>whateverr the fuck i do with hookers is my fucking business , and why
>>the fuck do you knowe anythinga bout hookers anyway??????/ watta you
>>do with hookers , or are you tooo stoopud ot have a answer for
>>that?????????///?
> You are kidding, right? What do you do with hookers? hahaha :) How
> moronic can you get?
..............
yore obviusly a fuckin dunder head!!!!!!!!! yah , you dont fuckin know wutt to do with hookers , that prolly means youre less than 12 yeras old , and that wood explain a lot about how fucking stupid you seem to be cuzz you just lack fuckin life experiense!!!!!!!!
just yoo weait if you ekeep acting like thsi youll end up in prison one day cuzz some fucker will sue you for being such a fucking fuck!!!!!! and then youll get one fuck of a lot of fucking life experience!!!!!!
On Mon, 22 Oct 2012 03:32:35 +0000 (UTC), Constance Boring, slack jaw
and glaced eyes,spittle flying, staggered over to his key-board and
managed to lift his knuckles off the floor long enough to type:
>yore obviusly a fuckin dunder head!!!!!!!!! yah , you dont fuckin know >wutt to do with hookers , that prolly means youre less than 12 yeras old >, and that wood explain a lot about how fucking stupid you seem to be >cuzz you just lack fuckin life experiense!!!!!!!!
Wow man, that's deep... hahaha :) Don't you just love it when you can
get one of these atheists to rant and rave like the brain-dead,
clueless clones they are? :)
Hey dude, look, you are in the Bhagavad Gita. The sages wrote about
you already 5000 years ago - what more proof do you need?
Krishna says:
Those miscreants who are grossly foolish, who are lowest among
mankind, whose knowledge is stolen by illusion, and who partake of the
atheistic nature of demons do not surrender unto Me. (Bg 7.15)
On Mon, 22 Oct 2012 06:23:27 +0530, Jahnu <Jahnud...@gamail.com>
wrote:
>On Sun, 21 Oct 2012 10:35:18 -0400, raven1 squawked:
>>Not a biologist, so his opinion is of no import.
>Wrong. I decide what's important, get it?
But you're a brainwashed ignoramus, so your opinion is of even less
import.
>Or are you too dense to even
>grasp the obvious.
That you're a brainwashed ignoramus? No, I got that a long time ago.
>>>"We must concede that there are presently no detailed Darwinian
>>>accounts of the evolution of any biochemical or cellular system, only
>>>a variety of wishful speculations."
>>True, but misleading. The exact details of how specific systems
>>evolved are not known at this time. So what?
>Which means ET is a blind belief that has nothing to with science.
No, it means we don't know all the details, and admit as much. Science
claims neither omniscience nor infallibility: if it possessed either,
there would no longer be a need for scientific inquiry.
> As
>long as we are clear on that, Birdman.
What's clear is that you either don't understand the basics of how
science works, or you're confusing it with religion, which pulls
answers out of its ass instead of admitting "we don't know that yet".
>"New species usually appear in the fossil record suddenly, not
>connected with their ancestors by a series of intermediates."
>--Eminent evolutionary biologist Ernst Mayr
Explained by equally the eminent Gould and Eldredge (whom you
ridiculously tried to quote to discredit evolution a little while
ago).
>Science now know that many of the pillars of the Darwinian theory are
>either false or misleading. Yet biology texts continue to present them
>as factual evidence of Evolution. What does this imply about their
>scientific standards? - Jonathan Wells
LOL! The Moonie ID advocate? He has been roundly criticized by his
peers for his own lack of scientific standards (and for his repeated
dishonesty). Please, Jesper, pull the other one!
On Mon, 22 Oct 2012 08:42:46 -0400, raven1 squawked:
>But you're a brainwashed ignoramus, so your opinion is of even less
>import.
You are kidding, right? :)
You forget, I'm superior to you in every sense of the word. In
knowledge, intelligence, ability, common sense, a happy and satisfying
life etc. etc. I make you look like a doorknob - I am like a BMW and
you are like a tricycle. There is no comparison, at all. Remember
that, Birdman. It was a Hare Krishna who came and made you look like
the ignorant, prejudiced twat you are...:) And there is nothing you
can do about it except bitch and squawk and whine about it, hehe :)
Krishna says:
Just try to learn the truth by approaching a spiritual master. Inquire
from him submissively and render service unto him. The self-realized
souls can impart knowledge unto you because they have seen the truth.
(Bg. 4.34)
Having obtained real knowledge from a self-realized soul, you will
never fall again into such illusion, for by this knowledge you will
see that all living beings are but part of the Supreme, or, in other
words, that they are Mine. (Bg. 4.35)
Even if you are considered to be the most sinful of all sinners, when
you are situated in the boat of transcendental knowledge you will be
able to cross over the ocean of miseries. (Bg. 4.36)
As a blazing fire turns firewood to ashes, O Arjuna, so does the fire
of knowledge burn to ashes all reactions to material activities. (Bg.
4.37)
In this world, there is nothing so sublime and pure as transcendental
knowledge. Such knowledge is the mature fruit of all mysticism. And
one who has become accomplished in the practice of devotional service
enjoys this knowledge within himself in due course of time. (Bg. 4.38)
A faithful man who is dedicated to transcendental knowledge and who
subdues his senses is eligible to achieve such knowledge, and having
achieved it he quickly attains the supreme spiritual peace. (Bg. 4.39)
But ignorant and faithless persons who doubt the revealed scriptures
do not attain God consciousness; they fall down. For the doubting soul
there is happiness neither in this world nor in the next. (Bg. 4.40)
On Mon, 22 Oct 2012 18:23:43 +0530, Jahnu <Jahnud...@gamail.com>
wrote:
>On Mon, 22 Oct 2012 08:42:46 -0400, raven1 squawked:
>>But you're a brainwashed ignoramus, so your opinion is of even less
>>import.
>You are kidding, right? :)
Not at all. The record is there for all to see. You simple-mindedly
regurgitate the same few phrases that your cult has drilled into your
head ad nauseam. There's no thought on your part at all; you may as
well be a parrot.
>You forget, I'm superior to you in every sense of the word.
Reality check here, Jesper: your intelligence is eclipsed by that of a
houseplant, and objectively, you're a pathetic loser who joined a cult
because he couldn't function as a productive member of society. Your
delusions of superiority to anyone are absolutely hilarious.
After many births and deaths, he who is actually in knowledge
surrenders unto Me, knowing Me to be the cause of all causes and all
that is. Such a great soul is very rare. (Bg 7.19)
> On Mon, 22 Oct 2012 18:23:43 +0530, Jahnu <Jahnud...@gamail.com>
> wrote:
>> On Mon, 22 Oct 2012 08:42:46 -0400, raven1 squawked:
>>> But you're a brainwashed ignoramus, so your opinion is of even less
>>> import.
>> You are kidding, right? :)
> Not at all. The record is there for all to see. You simple-mindedly
> regurgitate the same few phrases that your cult has drilled into your
> head ad nauseam. There's no thought on your part at all; you may as
> well be a parrot.
>> You forget, I'm superior to you in every sense of the word.
Nope. Only in the sense found in definition 2.
Definition of superior
adjective
1 higher in rank, status, or quality:
2 having or showing an overly high opinion of oneself;
3 (of a letter, figure, or symbol) written or printed above the line.
4 chiefly Anatomy further above or out; higher in position.
> Reality check here, Jesper: your intelligence is eclipsed by that of a
> houseplant, and objectively, you're a pathetic loser who joined a cult
> because he couldn't function as a productive member of society. Your
> delusions of superiority to anyone are absolutely hilarious.
On Mon, 22 Oct 2012 11:24:36 -0500, Dakota <ma...@NOSPAMmail.com>
wrote:
>Nope. Only in the sense found in definition 2.
I am not expressing a belief here, I'm simply stating a fact. To
compare the Birdman to me, is like comparing a tricycle to a BMW. I'm
not saying this out of arrogance or personal ambition or anything like
it, I am saying it, so you can understand how superior Hare Krishna is
to any other explanation offered in the world of the reality we live
in.
Hare Krishna offers the most consistent, comprehensive, systematic,
intelligent, and detailed system of knowledge to explain the reality
we live in. Note, again, I'm not expressing an opinion here. It is an
indisputable fact, verifiable by anyone who takes time to investigate
it with an open mind. There are no philosophical, existential, social,
religious, meta-physical or theological questions in the world, that
are not answered in depth in the Vedic Version.
Take Einstein, for instance. If you had given Einstein a pendrive and
told him - there are 3000 books on this stick, and pictures of your
mother as well - he would have been left completely flabbergasted and
mystified. In fact, he would have had no way of understanding the
working principles behind the pendrive. He would be in complete
darkness. He wouldn't know what was going on or what you were talking
about, because he would have had no reference to judge his experience
by.
Atheists, with their limited mental and intellectual frameworks, are
in the same position when trying to understand Krishna . Now, if you
give the same pendrive to a modern computer geek - some teenager - he
can tell you all about what makes a pendrive work. Similarly, Hare
Krishna can tell you everything about how God, the body, the mind, and
the world work. The reason for this, is that in Hare Krishna the
right, original framework for understanding reality is given. This
process of knowledge has descended into the world via the disciplic
succession going back to Krishna Himself 5000 years ago, when He spoke
Bhagavad Gita to Arjuna.
Jiva Goswami, a Hare Krsna from the 1500s, had this to say about
understanding God - the first thing you have to understand, to know
God - Krishna, is to understand that He is inconceivable.
Krishna is as far away from the materially conditioned mind of modern
man, as a computer is from, say, George Washington. You don't have the
slightest way of understanding God before and unless you accept that
God is inconceivable, that He can act in mysterious, inconceivable
ways. To maintain that every experience - the sum total of reality,
can be expressed entirely in physical, scientific terms is so
amazingly dumb that it shows the efficiency of the modern propaganda
machine.
The prapaganda-machine conditions and indoctrinates everyone into
thinking that they are the enjoyers, and that they can be happy by
gratifying the bodily senses. In fact, there are no other goals in the
Coca-cola culture except growing up, getting an education, so you can
get a job in order to make money so you can spend it. There is nothing
beyond that. How hopeless is that? It may seem ok for the successful
people, who due to good karma are getting their desires fulfilled, but
for the vast scores of people who live in poverty and suffering, how
is it beneficial to tell them that this life is the only chance you'll
ever get to have your desires fulfilled? After that - nothing. It's a
sick world-view that conditions one to a life in misery and
disappointment. Atheism actually makes you mentally ill. Hare Krishna
Rules...
Krishna says:
O Arjuna, as the Supreme Personality of Godhead, I know everything
that has happened in the past, all that is happening in the present,
and all things that are yet to come. I also know all living entities;
but Me no one knows (Bg 7.26)
My dear Arjuna, because you are never envious of Me, I shall impart to
you this most confidential knowledge and realization, knowing which
you shall be relieved of the miseries of material existence. (Bg. 9.1)
This knowledge is the king of education, the most secret of all
secrets. It is the purest knowledge, and because it gives direct
perception of the self by realization, it is the perfection of
religion. It is everlasting, and it is joyfully performed. (Bg. 9.2)
O learned Uddhava, those who fix their consciousness on Me, giving up
all material desires, share with Me a happiness that cannot possibly
be experienced by those engaged in sense gratification.
On Oct 18, 9:27 pm, raven1 <quoththera...@nevermore.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Oct 2012 06:17:16 +0530, Jahnu <Jahnud...@gamail.com>
> wrote:
> >On Wed, 17 Oct 2012 12:31:10 -0400, raven1 whined:
> >>I believe no such thing,
> >Yep, that's exactly what you believe.
> No, it isn't. Jesper, I may think that what you believe is idiotic,
> but I don't misrepresent it. There's no point in continuing this
> particular discussion if you're going to spend your time attacking a
> strawman that I don't support.
You are wasting your time with a half Indian.
You know what are the opinions of most people when dealing with such a
character?
"When you see a snake and an Indian, you would kill the Indian
first" (In this case the half Indian).
On Mon, 22 Oct 2012 19:17:13 -0700 (PDT), Yap went:
<yap yap yap>
Krishna says:
Just try to learn the truth by approaching a spiritual master. Inquire
from him submissively and render service unto him. The self-realized
souls can impart knowledge unto you because they have seen the truth.
(Bg. 4.34)
Having obtained real knowledge from a self-realized soul, you will
never fall again into such illusion, for by this knowledge you will
see that all living beings are but part of the Supreme, or, in other
words, that they are Mine. (Bg. 4.35)
Even if you are considered to be the most sinful of all sinners, when
you are situated in the boat of transcendental knowledge you will be
able to cross over the ocean of miseries. (Bg. 4.36)
As a blazing fire turns firewood to ashes, O Arjuna, so does the fire
of knowledge burn to ashes all reactions to material activities. (Bg.
4.37)
In this world, there is nothing so sublime and pure as transcendental
knowledge. Such knowledge is the mature fruit of all mysticism. And
one who has become accomplished in the practice of devotional service
enjoys this knowledge within himself in due course of time. (Bg. 4.38)
A faithful man who is dedicated to transcendental knowledge and who
subdues his senses is eligible to achieve such knowledge, and having
achieved it he quickly attains the supreme spiritual peace. (Bg. 4.39)
But ignorant and faithless persons who doubt the revealed scriptures
do not attain God consciousness; they fall down. For the doubting soul
there is happiness neither in this world nor in the next. (Bg. 4.40)
On Tuesday, October 16, 2012 11:13:12 AM UTC-4, Christopher A. Lee wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 10:17:49 -0400, raven1
> <quoththera...@nevermore.com> wrote:
> >On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 12:53:00 +0530, Jahnu <Jahnud...@gamail.com>wrote:
> >>If someone came and told you that everything you hold dear, everything you believe in, everything you thought you knew, all your values, all you hopes and aspirations, all your love for wife, kids, family,
> >>friends, and society, in fact, the entire foundation of your life - it is all wrong, it is all an illusion - you'd probably think that that
> >>someone was on drugs or belonged in a mental institution.
>Or that they spent too much time navel-gazing and chanting to imaginary Hindu gods, because their cult told them to.
> Same thing - especially when they refuse either to put up or shut up.
> Like Jesper Wernberg.
> >>In this modern day and age of relativism and liberalism, it is more or less a no-no to know the Absolute Truth. You are allowed to know with
> >>certainty such things as science and technology,
> >Science makes no claim to certainty. All scientific knowledge is provisional.
> What "absolute truth" was the in-your-face serial liar lying about?
> >>but if you claim that you have ascertained the original, genuine knowledge of religion from
> >>God Himself, if you profess to know God and the real meaning of life, you are immediately dismissed as a deranged fanatic.
> If they claim they get their in-your-face bullshit from some hypothetical god only their fellow cultists believe in, they _are_ deranged fanatics.
> >No, actually, most people here have read considerable numbers of your posts before
> Deranged fanatics imagine those who don't believe their delusions, are deluded.
> >>All religions claim the same thing, comes the invariable response.
> >How would you know? Much of what you think you know about Hinduism is the sectarian interpretation of a cult, and you have demonstrated that know next to nothing about any other religions. Moreover, the
> >statement that "all religions claim the same thing" is true mainly at a superficial level: they all claim knowledge that they cannot support about subjects that cannot be demonstrated to have empirical existence. Beyond that, the specifics of their claims vary wildly.
> I once had a Hindu girlfriend, and mainstream Hindus treat the Hari Krishnas the way mainstream Christians treat the moonies.
> >>Lets examine this typical response of modern man. You see, it is actually quite foolish. First it is asserted, that everyone says so.
> >Yes, this is known as setting up a straw man.
> Why bother being polite? Call it what it is: dishonesty and lying.
> >>Then the fact that everyone says so, is used to negate what is being said.
> >>If everyone says the same thing, the logical thing to assume is that there must be something to it.
> >No, that is not the "logical thing", at least not for the purpose of an argument. This is, in fact, the basic logical fallacy of argumentum ad numerum.
> "Eat shit - sixty billion flies can't all be wrong"
> >> Not that everyone says the same thing, so therefore it must be false. How does that make sense?
> >I have no idea where you're going with this, but since your initial premise is wrong, and you've already tripped over two Logic 101 fallacies, it really doesn't matter...
> It was another of his lies.
> >> Where is the logic?
> >Damned if I know...
> >>In fact, you would expect all religions to say basically the same things, because all religions are different cultural expressions of the same Absolute Truth.
> What "absolute truth" was the in-your-face serial liar lying about?
> >Whoa there, sport! Different cultural expressions, sure, but you've just massively assumed your conclusion of an "absolute truth". Is there a basic logical fallacy you aren't planning on using?
> Religionists don't understand just how much of what they take for granted, is unfounded.
> >> Surely, the details may vary, but if all
> >>religions are differently conditioned expressions of the same truth, you'd expect they would mention the same basic principles.
> >Yet they don't. Which makes the rest of your screed pointless. Another Epic Fail from Jesper.
> He's seriously mentally ill. He is obsessed with us and has on more than one occasion said he's only here to take pot shots at us because his dislike for us.
> >>And that's what the Vedic version teaches us - that all religions are derived from the original religion from God Himself. If this is indeed
> Lies noted.
> And what fucking "God himself" was the deluded, question-begging moron talking about?
> >>so, it stands to reason that it can be investigated and verified. If it is a fact, it must be discernable. Otherwise it is just some belief, some speculation. And that is how religion is generally judged in modern society - some fanciful speculations and beliefs.
> Including this in-your-face, aggressively stupid moron's.
> >>Then again, if there is a supreme entity - that which is known as God it is a perfectly logical to assume that He has given a process by which He can be known.
> And if pigs had wings thy might fly.
> Does the retard have a point?
> >> But in the climate of the contemporary culture
> >>that at present rules the world, it is very unpopular to claim to know the original explanation from the Supreme Himself.
> What "the Supreme Himself" was the in-your-face question-begging moron bullshitting about?
>> How can you make such an outrageous claim, comes the response... nobody knows the Absolute Truth. It cannot be known.
> Multiple lies noted.
> >>So where does this strange idea come from that the Truth cannot be known? It comes from people, of course. It is something the majority of the population is brought up to believe in. But it makes no sense.
> >>If there is an Absolute Truth, if there is a God, if there is an ultimate purpose to life, of course it can be known for certain. Why? Because God, being the almighty, omnipresent, all-knowing Supreme, surely He can verify Himself beyond doubt.
> Multiple lies and more question-begging noted.
> >>And if there is no God, if everything is indeed relative and material, then it cannot be verified. By definition, you can't prove a negative.
> >>That's the funny thing about life - if God exists, it can be known for sure, but if God does not exist, it is not possible to know for certain. Note, this is not my opinion, I'm merely stating a fact - if God exists, it can be known, because then God can verify His own existence. And if He does not exist, then it cannot be known. It's as simple as that.
> More meaningless, question-begging stupidity.
> >>Note how the propaganda-machine tells us the exact opposite.
> What "propaganda machine" was the in-your-face serial liar lying about?
It calls religious people believers, and atheists are called unbelievers. How misleading is that? As an atheist you believe in something that cannot be verified.
> >> But as a theist you believe in something that, at > >> least theoretically, has a chance of being
> >> verified.
> So the in-your-face crackpot has either to put up or > shut the fuck up. But being a mentally ill, deluded > in-your-face obsessive he is psychologically > incapable.
> >>Thus it can be concluded that it is a an > >>intellectually superior position to believe in > >>God,
> Lie noted.
> >> rather than the opposite.
> Strawman.
>The first assumption, that there is a God, has a chance of verification, whereas the second position, that there is no God, cannot be verified.
> The CONCLUSION (is the deluded crackpot even capable > of understanding the difference?) about something > the deluded crackpot is incapable of understand is > merely his irrelevant religious belief that we > wouldn't give a flying fuck about if he kept it to > himself, is falsifiable - all he has to do is > provide the verification for it that he bullshits
> about.
> >>But if you dare point out these things - even > >>though they are indisputable facts - you are met > >>with a wall of resistance - no, no, nobody knows > >>the truth. God is merely a fairy tale. To believe > >>in God is no more different than believing in > >>tooth-fairies and Santa Claus.
> >>That's what we are told.
> Because it isn't - UNTIL THE AGGRESSIVELY STUPID, IN-YOUR-FACE LUNATIC BACKS UP HIS IN-OUR-FACE STUPIDITY.
> >>What we can learn from this, is that society is > >>not ruled by benevolent forces. What kind of > >>society will educate it's population in something > >>so obviously false?
> Theistic societies.
> >> So if you know the truth and you want to inform people about it, you are up against a massive wall of
> >>resistance.
> Why do these liars call their religious fantasies "the truth"?
> If it really were, they could prove it was.
> And they wouldn't need to lie about those who don't share their beliefs.
> >>Krishna says:
> Mythical figures don't say anything outside the deluded fantasies of the brainwashed.
> >>Now hear, O son of Prtha, how by practicing yoga in full consciousness of Me, with mind attached to Me, you can know Me in full, free from doubt. (Bg 7.1)
> >>I shall now declare unto you in full this knowledge, both phenomenal and numinous. This being known, nothing
On Wednesday, October 17, 2012 11:37:56 PM UTC-4, Constance Knoring wrote:
> Jahnu <Jahnud...@gamail.com> wrote in
> news:cmis78tvfn2c1v493o41c888ii1uqu74d1@4ax.com: > > On Wed, 17 Oct 2012 02:16:39 +0000 (UTC), Constance Boring ranted:
> >>you ever been to prison boi??????? you woodnt last one day without getting fucking shivved or punched or assraped or something violent, and you know why?????? cuzz your a fuckni goofball!!!!!!!
> >>you need to be locked up in the fucking mental hospitol cuzz your such a deluded sun of a fucked up bitch , yoore mental state is fucked!!!!!!! totally fucking fucked!!!!!!!!
> >>if you called someone a fucking dog in prison do you know what will fucking happen to you???????? theyll make you crawl on your fucken hands and nees and beg to be gang-assraped and then thell knock out
> >>yer teeth and make you give bloody blow jobs to eveyr fucker who fucking wants one!!!!!! yore a stupid hsit!!!!!!!!
> >>go piss up a fucking rope!!!!!!!!!
> > hehe, dude, you really need to get laid. Of course, you were born ugly, so you've always had a hard time getting laid, but your lack of personal hygiene dosn't help matters. Have you tried with a shower...I mean, apart from the weekly one you have in the sink? Try that, then report back if it helped. Who knows, maybe even a speech therapist could help you... hahaha :)
> > Hey look, you are in the Bhagavad Gita - Krishna says:
Wagga wagga woo
> what a asshole you are , twistign things cuzz thats you , totally fucking fucked up , full of shit and fucking proud to be full of shit cuzz your too fuckin stupidd to get it!!!!!!!!!
> hey zipperhead go piss up a fuckin rope!!!!!!!!!!
You're getting repetitive, Zachy. Jahnu is mentally
ill like you, but he doesn't (as far as I know) have
multiple personalities.
On Wednesday, October 17, 2012 12:40:46 PM UTC-4, Christopher A. Lee wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Oct 2012 06:05:23 +0530, Jahnu <Jahnud...@gamail.com>wrote:
> >On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 10:23:56 -0400, raven1
> ><quoththera...@nevermore.com> wrote:
> >>Jesper is quite happy to repeat the same idiotic strawman about evolution, as he has learned nothing about what it actually claims in the nearly 20 years he's been here on alt.atheism. This is what our
> >>Catholic friends like to call "Invincible Ignorance".
> >Of course, it's not so flattering to believe that amoebas grow legs and learn to talk, but that's exactly what you believe.
> Why can' you stop lying about the very people you lie to?
It's not like atheists are non-believers, as they fancy to call themselves. As an atheist you believe in the most idiotic, unintelligent, unlikely nonsense.
This from as brainwashed idiot whose wife and kids left him.
> Why can't your co-religionists in alt.religion.vaisnava keep your lies and nastiness about those who don't believe what you do, under
> control?
They've tried. They don't like him any better there than we do here. After all, Jahnu is insane.
> >---but,but, but It's not like the amoeba grew legs > > and learned to talk. It happened over long time > > through series of little changes.
> Evolution is nothing whatsoever to do with atheism, > pathological liar - it is accepted by educated > people of all religions.
> >hahaha :) Do you see now, how atheism has damaged your brain, Birdman?
> >Tell me this, if your retard beliefs were true, why > >don't we see amoebas and other living entities in > >the process of changing. All we have ever seen are > >the species as they appear today. Where are all the > >species in the process of changing into other > >species? Care to elaborate on that, Birdman?
> You're certifiably insane.
This has been explained to him many times. He ignores the answer.
> >Now watch Birdman squirm and obfuscate. The last thing he wants to do is have to explain the rationale behind his lame convictions.
Evolution isn't immediate, twit. It occurs over a long period of time.
> Lie noted.
Lying is all Jesper knows how to do. He can no longer think for himself. All he can do is quote and repeat
the same dumb questions over and over. I doubt that he
reads the answers. Like Christians, he is afraid to doubt. Thinking makes his head hurt.
> >Hey look, Birdman, you are in the Bhagavad Gita - Krishna says:
Oh, look at the pretty birdies!
> Why do you imagine a book of ancient myths and legends has any relevance?
On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 06:43:00 +0530, Jahnu <Jahnud...@gamail.com>
wrote:
>On Mon, 22 Oct 2012 11:24:36 -0500, Dakota <ma...@NOSPAMmail.com>
>wrote:
>>Nope. Only in the sense found in definition 2.
>I am not expressing a belief here,
You are expressing a delusion here.
> I'm simply stating a fact. To
>compare the Birdman to me, is like comparing a tricycle to a BMW. I'm
>not saying this out of arrogance or personal ambition or anything like
>it
You are saying it out of very obvious mental illness that causes you
to wildly overestimate your own intelligence, knowledge, and abilities
to a degree bordering on hubris. Whether this is a result of drug
abuse, brainwashing, an underlying pathology, or a combination of
factors is unclear, but also unimportant: the bottom line is that
you're a walking, chanting epitome of the Dunning-Kruger effect in
action.
>> I'm simply stating a fact. To
>> compare the Birdman to me, is like comparing a tricycle to a BMW. I'm
>> not saying this out of arrogance or personal ambition or anything like
>> it
> You are saying it out of very obvious mental illness that causes you
> to wildly overestimate your own intelligence, knowledge, and abilities
> to a degree bordering on hubris. Whether this is a result of drug
> abuse, brainwashing, an underlying pathology, or a combination of
> factors is unclear, but also unimportant: the bottom line is that
> you're a walking, chanting epitome of the Dunning-Kruger effect in
> action.
On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 19:25:37 -0500, Dakota <ma...@NOSPAMmail.com>
wrote:
>2 having or showing an overly high opinion of oneself;
I have no high opinion of myself. I have a high opinion of Krishna.
That's the difference. The reason I'm superior to you, is because of
Krishna, nothing else...
You are like a dog without a master, or your paster is crooked. . I'm
a dog with the best master :)
Krishna says:
My dear Arjuna, because you are never envious of Me, I shall impart to
you this most confidential knowledge and realization, knowing which
you shall be relieved of the miseries of material existence. (Bg. 9.1)
This knowledge is the king of education, the most secret of all
secrets. It is the purest knowledge, and because it gives direct
perception of the self by realization, it is the perfection of
religion. It is everlasting, and it is joyfully performed. (Bg. 9.2)
On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 08:53:50 -0400, raven1 squawked
ROTFLMAO
Wow, that sounds intelligent :) <SMACK! - down boy, down>
"A common sense interpretation of the facts suggests that a
superintellect has monkeyed with physics, as well as with chemistry and biology, and that there are no blind forces worth speaking about
in nature. The numbers one calculates from the facts seem to me so overwhelming as to put this conclusion almost beyond question."
On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 18:56:07 +0530, Jahnu <Jahnud...@gamail.com>
wrote:
>On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 08:53:50 -0400, raven1 squawked
>ROTFLMAO
>Wow, that sounds intelligent :)
As if you'd know.
> <SMACK! - down boy, down>
>"A common sense interpretation of the facts suggests that a
>superintellect has monkeyed with physics, as well as with chemistry >and biology, and that there are no blind forces worth speaking about
>in nature. The numbers one calculates from the facts seem to me so >overwhelming as to put this conclusion almost beyond question."
> - Fred Hoyle, astrophysicist
Hoyle's largely a crank outside his field, and, quite often, even in
it. This is a good example.
"It is true, that a little philosophy inclineth man’s mind to atheism,
but depth in philosophy bringeth men's minds about to religion; for while the mind of man looketh upon second causes scattered, it may
sometimes rest in them, and go no further; but when it beholdeth the chain of them confederate, and linked together, it must needs fly to
Providence and Deity." - Sir Francis Bacon
