UN considers recognizing sexual rights for ten-year-old children

[J]

If this resolution passes at the United Nations, the champagne will be
flowing at organizations such as Planned Parenthood, GLAAD, and NAMBLA.
Why can't these people just leave the children alone?









http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/un-considers-recognizing-sexual-rights-for-ten-year-old-children







NEW YORK, March 30 (C-FAM) The UN Commission on Population and
Development is considering “sexual and reproductive health and rights”
for children as young as ten.


Even the Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon agrees. In a statement recently
released he said, “Young people, as much as all people, share the human
right to health, including sexual and reproductive health.”


Currently international law does not recognize a “right” to sexual and
reproductive health and certainly does not recognize this right in the
case of minors. But just last year, the UN Special Rapporteur for
Health, Anand Grover, stirred up significant controversy when he not
only claimed that a “right” of sexual and reproductive health existed
but attempted to define that right as including access to abortion,
contraception, and sexual education.


The association of this right with youth by the Secretary General and
the Commission on Population and Development (CPD), especially children,
is more controversial since the right could be defined as including
access to abortion and contraception.


Organizations like International Planned Parenthood (IPPF) and IPAS,
staunch advocates for the sexual and reproductive rights of minors
internationally and at the United Nations, have already issued official
reports to the conference bureau supportive of rights language including
contraception and abortion. They are also using the conference as an
opportunity to attack parental involvement in the sexual health of their
children.


For organizations like IPPF, parents are the biggest obstacle to minors
accessing services like abortion and contraception, and they hope to
secure language at the conference that will marginalize their role.











--
J Young
jdyo...@ymail.com

[Jeanne Douglas]

In article <5h2jir....@news.alt.net>, J <jdyo...@ymail.com>
wrote:

> If this resolution passes at the United Nations, the champagne will be
> flowing at organizations such as Planned Parenthood, GLAAD, and NAMBLA.
> Why can't these people just leave the children alone?

"J"'s against preventive health care for children.

Is anyone surprised?

--
JD

"the lybian lier"

[W.T.S.]

In article <5h2jir....@news.alt.net>, Jerk...@Liar.com says...

>
> If this resolution passes at the United Nations, the champagne will be
> flowing at organizations such as Planned Parenthood, GLAAD, and NAMBLA.
> Why can't these people just leave the children alone?

Translation: "J" resents kids being protected from unwanted child
birth.
>
> http://www.LieSiteLies.com/Lies/Disinformation/Propaganda/

Thank you, "J", for that very highly slanted article by your internet
lie rag.

Abortion and sterilization, they save the lives, health and futures of
women and men alike!
>
http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/print/14481
>
http://www.jennyjerrome.org/
>
http://tinyurl.com/3j3fkch
>
http://www.egalitarian.biz/Plan-B--Remedy-of-a-Lifetime.html
>
http://www.thelizlibrary.org/liz/004.htm
>
Breed like rabbits, live like pigs.
Live like pigs, die like rats!
>
Modern Christian: Someone who can take time out from
complaining about "welfare mothers popping out babies we
have to feed" to complain about welfare mothers getting
abortions that PREVENT more babies to be raised at public
expense.
>
http://www.imnotsorry.net
>
http://img.gawkerassets.com/img/17gbnyv0yzhevjpg/original.jpg