> BlankDon't let the simple mind of the atheist ever fool you.
> They hate God,
Know what I hate? I hate giant purple unicorns that eat the
tires off my car.
That's what I hate.
> Don't let the simple mind of the atheist ever fool you.
> They hate God,and to hate something you must believe in it.
How can we hate something that doesn't exist ?
>>>>>>>rest of crap snipped<<<<<<
--
Jez
"The condition of alienation, of being asleep, of being unconscious,
of being out of one's mind, is the condition of the normal man. Society
highly values its normal man.It educates children to lose themselves
and to become absurd,and thus to be normal. Normal men have killed
perhaps 100,000,000 of their fellow normal men in the last fifty years."
R.D. Laing
Yeah man, it's a bummer when that happens.
>
> That's what I hate.
Damned right !
> BlankDon't let the simple mind of the atheist ever fool you.
> They hate God,and to hate something you must believe in it.
<YAWN!!>
How many strawmen are you planning to attack in this place? You're doing
nothing but providing a very small amount of entertainment to us. You're
certainly not saying anything that "bruises" us. You poor sap.
--
Nemo - EAC Commissioner for Bible Belt Underwater Operations.
Atheist #1331 (the Palindrome of doom!)
BAAWA Knight! - One of those warm Southern Knights, y'all!
Charter member, SMASH!!
http://home.earthlink.net/~jehdjh/Relpg.html
Draco Dormiens Nunquam Titillandus
Quotemeister since March 2002
it's better to begin a "holy war" starting from avoiding to post in html
format
asshole
--
B. Catalano
www.alexamenos.com
I guess someone funds this relic of a pewsitter in order to appear just too
idiotic to cope with; it is impossible to be born a complete imbecile like
that, unless with some studies applied to become one, or even with a paid
motivation.
--
B. Catalano
www.alexamenos.com
I've tried pointing this out but he seems too thick to understand.
Why do they have to say we 'hate'......are they so threatened by our
lack of belief ?
If they want to belive in a 'God', hey, that's fine by me, but because I
don't belive in a 'God' or in the existence of a 'God' they say I hate
'God'.
It just makes no sense !
But then nothing about religion does...so....
I hate that reclusive little monster that keeps eating one sock at a
time and leaving dust bunny droppings under the furniture.
> BlankDon't let the simple mind of the atheist ever fool you.
Gee, another post from "Church of The Painful Tooth", and he's changed his
name, surprisingly, yet again...
--
Phÿltêr
AA#1938
Denizen of Darkness #44 & AFJC Antipodean Attaché
http://forums.clickhalah.com/index.php
Remove "s" to respond
>kathryn wrote:
>
>> "Jez" <iced_...@NOSPAMdsl.pipex.com> wrote in message
>> news:4130303f$0$20244$cc9e...@news-text.dial.pipex.com...
>>
>>>Atheist Bruiser wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Don't let the simple mind of the atheist ever fool you.
>>>>They hate God,and to hate something you must believe in it.
>>>
>>>How can we hate something that doesn't exist ?
>>>
>>> >>>>>>>rest of crap snipped<<<<<<
>>>
>>>--
>>>Jez
>>>
>>
>>
>> I've tried pointing this out but he seems too thick to understand.
>
>Why do they have to say we 'hate'......are they so threatened by our
>lack of belief ?
Because they are incapable of granting our actual point of view - it
would reflect against them. It's easier to rationalise (invent) "real"
reasons that reflect badly on us.
Doesn't matter whether it's religion, politics or a whole slew of
other things people are irrational about. The lies and demonisation
(particularly by Bush supporters) have been an eye-opener for many
people who haven't been on the receiving end of this sort of thing
before as we have.
It's endemic. People who see US actions in terms of world historical
context of what went before, are told they only say this because they
hate America, etc.
> kathryn wrote:
>
>> "Jez" <iced_...@NOSPAMdsl.pipex.com> wrote in message
>> news:4130303f$0$20244$cc9e...@news-text.dial.pipex.com...
>>
>>>Atheist Bruiser wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Don't let the simple mind of the atheist ever fool you. They hate
>>>>God,and to hate something you must believe in it.
>>>
>>>How can we hate something that doesn't exist ?
>>>
>>> >>>>>>>rest of crap snipped<<<<<<
>>>
>>>--
>>>Jez
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I've tried pointing this out but he seems too thick to understand.
>
> Why do they have to say we 'hate'......are they so threatened by our lack
> of belief ?
>
> If they want to belive in a 'God', hey, that's fine by me, but because I
> don't belive in a 'God' or in the existence of a 'God' they say I hate
> 'God'.
>
> It just makes no sense !
Well, in that little troll's world it makes a *kind of sense. I mean,
since he found "god" in his mirror and he knows we don't like *him...
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
Alt-atheism website at: http://www.alt-atheism.org
-----------------------------------------------------------
"Often anger is a sign of engagement with life. People who
are angry are touched deeply by the events of their lives
and feel strongly about them....Anger is just a demand for
change, a passionate wish for things to be different....
And, as it was for me, it may be the first expression of
the will to live." -- Rachel Naomi Remen
That's not a "monster." That's Lint rapturing worthy socks that have
attained paradise!
>On Sat, 28 Aug 2004 04:52:41 -0700 in episode
><78e3ae70.04082...@posting.google.com> we saw our hero
>papa...@cybertown.com (VoiceOfReason):
>
>> "JTEM" <jay...@gaydar.co.uk> wrote in message
>> news:<EvWdnd5x7Lr...@comcast.com>...
>>> "Atheist Bruiser" <Atheist...@Intelligence.com> wrote
>>>
>>> > BlankDon't let the simple mind of the atheist ever fool you. They hate
>>> > God,
>>>
>>> Know what I hate? I hate giant purple unicorns that eat the tires off my
>>> car.
>>>
>>> That's what I hate.
>>
>> I hate that reclusive little monster that keeps eating one sock at a time
>> and leaving dust bunny droppings under the furniture.
>
>That's not a "monster." That's Lint rapturing worthy socks that have
>attained paradise!
Thank you, Mark for spreading the Truth®. Of course, the dust
bunnies are merely a byproduct.
Liz #658 BAAWA
"Lintanetics®" by L<dot> iz
A guide to a cleaner, brighter laundry.
Guaranteed to remove lamb's blood stains.
> On Sat, 28 Aug 2004 11:36:15 +0100 in episode
> <41306045$0$20252$cc9e...@news-text.dial.pipex.com> we saw our hero Jez
> <iced_...@NOSPAMdsl.pipex.com>:
>
>
>>kathryn wrote:
>>
>>
>>>"Jez" <iced_...@NOSPAMdsl.pipex.com> wrote in message
>>>news:4130303f$0$20244$cc9e...@news-text.dial.pipex.com...
>>>
>>>
>>>>Atheist Bruiser wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Don't let the simple mind of the atheist ever fool you. They hate
>>>>>God,and to hate something you must believe in it.
>>>>
>>>>How can we hate something that doesn't exist ?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>rest of crap snipped<<<<<<
>>>>
>>>>--
>>>>Jez
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>I've tried pointing this out but he seems too thick to understand.
>>
>>Why do they have to say we 'hate'......are they so threatened by our lack
>>of belief ?
>>
>>If they want to belive in a 'God', hey, that's fine by me, but because I
>>don't belive in a 'God' or in the existence of a 'God' they say I hate
>>'God'.
>>
>>It just makes no sense !
>
>
> Well, in that little troll's world it makes a *kind of sense. I mean,
> since he found "god" in his mirror and he knows we don't like *him...
>
Hehehe !
Do you think if I prayed to Lint, he'd make the underpants knomes go away?
:)
--
__________
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
Great Lint®! You have an underwear gnome infestation? That's
serious. Praying won't work (it never does), but appeasement has been
known to be effective. Send me baklava and I'll see if I can do
anything for you.
Rats! She saw through my subterfuge. Back to the drawing board.
Überwench #658 Now a *real* atheist!
Dame Liz the Undaunted Ath.D BAAWA
Charter Member of SMASH
and Queen of the known universe
> They hate God,and to hate something you must believe in it.
I must believe I am here and yet I don't hate it.
> The very mention of God or Christ's name infuriates the God haters.
God God God :) Unicorn Unicorn Unicorn ;)
> They have the Don Quixote syndrome ,meaning that they attack windmills
> because in their shallow and narrow minds the windmill represents a
> threat to them.
We don't "attack" unicorns. We just say that no one has provided
credible evidence that they even exist.
> Atheists spend too much time shaking their tiny little fists
My fist is big just like my dick.
> toward
> heaven,
Where's that? Do you mean outerspace? Some afterlife wandering a
lifeless moon. Is there a direction in which heaven exists that you
could point at?
> and spitting into the wind,
> for us not to infer that they
> believe in God.
So people who are stupid enough to spit into the wind believe in God?
> The Bible teaches that all men have an innate knowledge of God (Light of
> Conscience),
Don't believe everything you read.
> as well as a perception of God all around them (Light of
> Nature).
Like when a pride of lions is disemboweling a zebra or a wasp grub is
eating it's living prey from the inside out.
> From the Scriptural perspective, an atheist isn't one who
> disbelieves in God.
So as believers are we all going to heaven? :)
> But -rather- one who refuses to believe in God !
We either believe or not. If we believe then how can we refuse to.
We might be lying but we wouldn't be refusing. But why not just take
our word for it? I think I'm much more in touch with my beliefs than
some liar writing a book to get the other goat herders to do what he
wants.
> Folks, never be deceived by talk of "pluralism". Satan and God are at
> WAR. There's no truces, no accommodation, no peace treaty between Good
> and Evil. One side or the other shall win and completely smash the
> other. All this stuff about "tolerance" and "pluralism" is for us. They
> hope we'll buy into it, but they know THEY will never tolerate Christ or
> accept a pluralism that includes real Christians
You sound like one of those wacked out guy who flew the planes into
the World Trade Center. They don't like pluralism also. This is
very "unamerican" of you.
That baklava stuff must be *real powerful...
> On Sat, 28 Aug 2004 07:38:57 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
> <alt-a...@org.webmaster> in news message
> <0fadnZwcpIl...@megapath.net> wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 28 Aug 2004 04:52:41 -0700 in episode
>><78e3ae70.04082...@posting.google.com> we saw our hero
>>papa...@cybertown.com (VoiceOfReason):
>>
>>> "JTEM" <jay...@gaydar.co.uk> wrote in message
>>> news:<EvWdnd5x7Lr...@comcast.com>...
>>>> "Atheist Bruiser" <Atheist...@Intelligence.com> wrote
>>>>
>>>> > BlankDon't let the simple mind of the atheist ever fool you. They
>>>> > hate God,
>>>>
>>>> Know what I hate? I hate giant purple unicorns that eat the tires off
>>>> my car.
>>>>
>>>> That's what I hate.
>>>
>>> I hate that reclusive little monster that keeps eating one sock at a
>>> time and leaving dust bunny droppings under the furniture.
>>
>>That's not a "monster." That's Lint rapturing worthy socks that have
>>attained paradise!
>
>
> Thank you, Mark for spreading the Truth®. Of course, the dust bunnies
> are merely a byproduct.
An illusion by the evil one. Sure Lint wouldn't be found in dusty corners
under beds and such!
Hey, if you want to get a sticky mess of baklava in the mail, I don't have a
problem with that :)
Never deny the power of honey, nuts, sugar, spices and paper thin pastry! :)
Don't let the simple mind of the atheist ever fool you.
They hate God,and to hate something you must believe in it.
i dont hate god - i hate his brainwashed followers. and his creepy institute even more.cant hate what doesnt exist. church is real. unfortunately.
> Great LintŽ! You have an underwear gnome infestation? That's
> serious. Praying won't work (it never does), but appeasement has been
> known to be effective. Send me baklava and I'll see if I can do
> anything for you.
>
>
>
> Liz #658 BAAWA
>
> "LintaneticsŽ" by L<dot> iz
> A guide to a cleaner, brighter laundry.
> Guaranteed to remove lamb's blood stains.
The very idea that there might be a LintŽ, the hypothetical first cause
depends upon the argument that there must be a first cause, and, as
Russell points out, that argument is one that cannot have any validity.
There is no possibility that there might actually be such a thing as
LintŽ, the hypothetical first cause, due to the fatal problem (special
pleading) inherent in the very idea of it, which Russell points out:
"The argument that there must be a first cause is one that cannot have
any validity. If anything must have a cause, then LintŽ must have a
cause. If there can be anything without a cause, it may just as well be
the world [universe] as LintŽ." -- Bertrand Russell (1872 - 1970)
It's a very simple problem for anybody who still believes there might be
one anyway. All they have to do is come up with an argument for LintŽ,
the hypothetical first cause, that does not run into this fatal problem
inherent in the very idea of it, which Russell points out.
<cue the chirping cicadas>
8^)
thank you so very muchthat was very amusingkinda like 14th century scientific papers
>
>"Atheist Bruiser" <Atheist...@Intelligence.com> wrote
>
>> BlankDon't let the simple mind of the atheist ever fool you.
>> They hate God,
>
>Know what I hate? I hate giant purple unicorns that eat the
>tires off my car.
>
>That's what I hate.
>
>
Then park your car in the garage, where they can't get at it.
--
Puck Greenman
#162
BAAWA Knight.
Blesed is the self righteous xtian,
for his is the sure and certain knowledge
that no matter what load of tripe he
comes out with:
God told him to say it.
> Never deny the power of honey, nuts, sugar, spices and paper thin pastry! :)
Nor ever deny the power of mee-krob!
--
GlennGlenn -- aa#825 -- dipthot...@yahoo.yahoo.com.com
"You can make an easy kind of link that, if you have a protest group protesting
a war where the cause that's being fought against is international terrorism,
you might have terrorism at that protest. You can almost argue that a protest
against that is a terrorist act. I've heard terrorism described as anything
that is violent or has an economic impact. Terrorism isn't just bombs going off
and killing people." --Mike van Winkle, a spokesperson for the California
Anti-Terrorism Information Center, another spinoff of the Homeland Security
Department
> How many strawmen are you planning to attack in this place? You're doing
> nothing but providing a very small amount of entertainment to us. You're
> certainly not saying anything that "bruises" us. You poor sap.
let him have his way. its funny =)
> BlankDon't let the simple mind of the atheist ever fool you.
> They hate God,and to hate something you must believe in it.
*
I'll go along with that! You say, "...to hate something you must
believe in it."
That's true. And if you don't believe in it you cannot hate it.
Hating God is like hating the Tooth Fairy or Paul Bunyan. Your God
is just another on the list of fictitious characters.
To me, it's not a matter of hate or love or whatever -- to me, God
is just not relevant. The subject just doesn't come up. This was
not always true. As an eight-year-old, I memorized my Bible verses
with the best of them. In fact, I was the star of the class --
reading the entire Bible twice!
But then something happened. I began my education. The role of the
Sunday School and Church is indoctrination. The role of the school
and university is education. There is a big difference.
I went into science and studied mathematics, chemistry, biology and
physics. By the time I was about 18, I was fairly certain that what
I learned in Sunday School came into direct conflict with what I
learned in Biology and Physics. They could not possible both be
true.
And I had to make a decision between the religious indoctrination of
the church, and the scientifically logical education of the
university.
The decision was not hard.
At first, I called myself an agnostic and later, atheist. I have
been an atheist now for over 50 years and it seems to work. I have
several degrees from major US universities -- I worked for about 40
years in scientific research -- mostly in the bioengineering area.
I am now retired, living in a big home on a beautiful acre on top of
a hill in the San Francisco Bay area.
I am an extremely moral person, giving my money, and more
importantly, my time, to the good of my fellow man. I lead disabled
children on guided walks along the northern California coast.
At the age of 73, I probably won't be around much longer. But
that's OK, too. I'm not going to hell -- in spite of what you might
think. Neither am I going to that heaven up in the sky.
Here's a question: Why do you call yourself 'Atheist Bruiser'? Is
that because you bruise atheists? Why would you want to bruise
someone like me? In your opinion, I suspect you think I am bound
for the fires of hell forever. Isn't that enough punishment? Do
you want to bruise me before I get there?
Do you have a real name?
earle
*
"Evolution does not require the nonexistence of God,
it merely allows for it. That alone is enough to evoke
condemnation from those who fear the nonexistence of God
more than they fear God Himself."
--Keith Doyle
--
__
__/\_\
/\_\/_/
\/_/\_\ earle
\/_/ jones
> Liz wrote:
>
> > Great Lintо! You have an underwear gnome infestation? That's
> > serious. Praying won't work (it never does), but appeasement has been
> > known to be effective. Send me baklava and I'll see if I can do
> > anything for you.
> >
> >
> >
> > Liz #658 BAAWA
> >
> > "Lintaneticsо" by L<dot> iz
> > A guide to a cleaner, brighter laundry.
> > Guaranteed to remove lamb's blood stains.
>
>
> The very idea that there might be a Lintо, the hypothetical first cause
> depends upon the argument that there must be a first cause,
Septic (of the Magically Invisible Space Lint) gets it wrong as unusal,
The idea that ther MUST be a Lint is what depends on the idea that there
MUST be a first cause, but the idea that there MIGHT be on only depends
on the idea that there MIGHT be one, as is evident form Russell's own
words:
> "The argument that there must be a first cause is one that cannot have
> any validity. If anything must have a cause, then Lintо must have a
> cause. If there can be anything without a cause, it may just as well be
> the world [universe] as Lintо." -- Bertrand Russell (1872 - 1970)
If we are restricting the discourse to people who are rational,
No Atheist would ( or could) say that he "Hated God"
Anyone making such a statement would be a Theist with a peculiar sense of
consequences.
RJ P
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.740 / Virus Database: 494 - Release Date: 8/16/04
>In article <BU2Yc.84721$mD.46415@attbi_s02>, Dixit <d...@nospam.net>
>wrote:
>
>> Liz wrote:
>>
>> > Great LintŽ! You have an underwear gnome infestation? That's
>> > serious. Praying won't work (it never does), but appeasement has been
>> > known to be effective. Send me baklava and I'll see if I can do
>> > anything for you.
>> >
>> >
>>
>> The very idea that there might be a LintŽ, the hypothetical first cause
>> depends upon the argument that there must be a first cause,
>
>
>Septic (of the Magically Invisible Space Lint) gets it wrong as unusal,
>
>The idea that ther MUST be a Lint is what depends on the idea that there
>MUST be a first cause, but the idea that there MIGHT be on only depends
>on the idea that there MIGHT be one, as is evident form Russell's own
>words:
>
>> "The argument that there must be a first cause is one that cannot have
>> any validity. If anything must have a cause, then LintŽ must have a
>> cause. If there can be anything without a cause, it may just as well be
>> the world [universe] as LintŽ." -- Bertrand Russell (1872 - 1970)
Which of you are claiming that LintŽ is the first cause of anything?
LintŽ began with the universe and evolved into the Laundry God,
pbuhahlb. As far as I know, and LintŽ verifies this, there was no
first cause.
So quibble between yourselves and leave LintŽ out of this.
<shakes head and goes to put in another load of laundry>
Liz #658 BAAWA
"LintaneticsŽ" by L<dot> iz
>On Sat, 28 Aug 2004 16:34:53 -0600, Virgil
><ITSnetNOTcom#vir...@COMCAST.com> in news message
><ITSnetNOTcom#virgil-51D7C5....@comcast.dca.giganews.com>
>wrote:
>
>>In article <BU2Yc.84721$mD.46415@attbi_s02>, Dixit <d...@nospam.net>
>>wrote:
>>
>>> Liz wrote:
>>>
>>> > Great Lint®! You have an underwear gnome infestation? That's
>>> > serious. Praying won't work (it never does), but appeasement has been
>>> > known to be effective. Send me baklava and I'll see if I can do
>>> > anything for you.
>>> >
>>> >
>
>>>
>>> The very idea that there might be a Lint®, the hypothetical first cause
>>> depends upon the argument that there must be a first cause,
>>
>>
>>Septic (of the Magically Invisible Space Lint) gets it wrong as unusal,
>>
>>The idea that ther MUST be a Lint is what depends on the idea that there
>>MUST be a first cause, but the idea that there MIGHT be on only depends
>>on the idea that there MIGHT be one, as is evident form Russell's own
>>words:
>>
>>> "The argument that there must be a first cause is one that cannot have
>>> any validity. If anything must have a cause, then Lint® must have a
>>> cause. If there can be anything without a cause, it may just as well be
>>> the world [universe] as Lint®." -- Bertrand Russell (1872 - 1970)
>
>
>Which of you are claiming that Lint® is the first cause of anything?
>Lint® began with the universe and evolved into the Laundry God,
>pbuhahlb. As far as I know, and Lint® verifies this, there was no
>first cause.
>
>So quibble between yourselves and leave Lint® out of this.
>
><shakes head and goes to put in another load of laundry>
>
Laundry, now that's an undeniable responsibility. Wish I still had
someone else to do it though!
--
Davidwd
~~~~~~~~~
irreligionist
> BlankDon't let the simple mind of the atheist ever fool you.
> They hate God,and to hate something you must believe in it.
No no no. You've got it all wrong. It's not YHWH I hate but rather the
Easter Bunny. I hate him with a passion. If I ever see that flea
bitten little rodent I'll push his stupid chocolate eggs right down
his throat and kick his fluffy tail right back to the equinox. But the
fairy in the Sky; he's harmless. No problem with him.
--
epicurus1*at*optusnet*dot*com*dot*au
apatriot #1, atheist #1417,
Chief EAC prophet
http://members.optusnet.com.au/~pk1956/
Apatriotism Yahoo Group
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/apatriotism
"Properly read, the Bible is the most potent force for atheism ever
conceived." - Isaac Asimov
You can put me on the mailing list....
--
Phÿltêr
AA#1938
Denizen of Darkness #44 & AFJC Antipodean Attaché
http://forums.clickhalah.com/index.php
Remove "s" to respond
> "*nemo*" <nemo...@earthlink.dieSPAM.net> ha scritto nel messaggio
> news:nemo0037-8AA162...@news06.east.earthlink.net...
>> How many strawmen are you planning to attack in this place? You're
>> doing nothing but providing a very small amount of entertainment to
>> us. You're certainly not saying anything that "bruises" us. You poor
>> sap.
>
> I guess someone funds this relic of a pewsitter in order to appear
> just too idiotic to cope with; it is impossible to be born a complete
> imbecile like that, unless with some studies applied to become one, or
> even with a paid motivation.
>
You've never been to Texas, have you?
--
Vic Sagerquist
aa#2011
Supervisor, EAC Department of little adhesive-backed "L" shaped
chrome-plastic doo-dads to add feet to Jesus fish department
______________
The whole foundation of Christianity is based on the idea that
intellectualism is the work of the Devil. Remember the apple on the tree?
Okay, it was the Tree of Knowledge. "You eat this apple, you're going to be
as smart as God. We can't have that."
[Frank Zappa]
<snip-snip-snippity-snip>
> You sound like one of those wacked out guy who flew the planes into
> the World Trade Center. They don't like pluralism also. This is
> very "unamerican" of you.
Prepare to be called a talking monkey, then told to shut up. Atheist
Bruiser, AKA Church of the Painful Truth, AKA Skywise, RKA Raymond
Ambrosini, gets a boner when he tallies up the number of responses he gets
from his idiotic rants. Then he goes up to the roof of his low-rent
apartment building and jacks off in the sun, 'cause he can only cum if he
thinks gawwwd is watching.
And, since there isn't any god...
I guess we can call him Blue Boy.
> >Know what I hate? I hate giant purple unicorns that eat the
> >tires off my car.
> >
> >That's what I hate.
> Then park your car in the garage, where they can't get at it.
I don't have a garage. At first I thought I never had one, but then
Mark Blibo mentioned something about a "Rapture" taking his
socks and leaving dust bunnies, and I've been thinking that maybe
I did have a garage and it was raptured & stuff.
I certainly have dust bunnies. I know 'cus I looked.
Coincidence? I don't think so.
We don't hate your sky pixie, Raytard. We hate you.
>On Sat, 28 Aug 2004 04:52:41 -0700 in episode
><78e3ae70.04082...@posting.google.com> we saw our hero
>papa...@cybertown.com (VoiceOfReason):
>
>> "JTEM" <jay...@gaydar.co.uk> wrote in message
>> news:<EvWdnd5x7Lr...@comcast.com>...
>>> "Atheist Bruiser" <Atheist...@Intelligence.com> wrote
>>>
>>> > BlankDon't let the simple mind of the atheist ever fool you. They hate
>>> > God,
>>>
>>> Know what I hate? I hate giant purple unicorns that eat the tires off my
>>> car.
>>>
>>> That's what I hate.
>>
>> I hate that reclusive little monster that keeps eating one sock at a time
>> and leaving dust bunny droppings under the furniture.
>
>That's not a "monster." That's Lint rapturing worthy socks that have
>attained paradise!
Yeah. So *you* say.... <G>
It makes perfect psychological sense. The fundamentalists often don't
have the certainty they profess. Nor do they feel the bliss that a
saved soul should feel. So a civilized, sane, and - especially - happy
atheist drives them crazy by putting the lie to their insecure
assertions. As my favorite philosphy professor used to observe, they
like to think of atheists as the unshaven, miserable wretches one
would see in Chick comics. A civilized and happy atheist means that
one doesn't have to be Baptist/Pentecostal/whatever to be happy.
But their doctrine requires the whole package to be right, and
unexamined. So if one part of their shaky faith is wrong, then...
Kermit
Or do you just enjoy putting it next to your name to make you feel smarter?
> On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 20:51:32 -0700, "Atheist Bruiser"
> <Atheist...@Intelligence.com> wrote:
>
> We don't hate your sky pixie, Raytard. We hate you.
>
>
>
>
Seconded!
> On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 20:51:32 -0700 the ET form known as Atheist
> Bruiser<Atheist...@Intelligence.com> sent a radio signal across
> the vast expanse of deep space -._.--._.--._.--._.--._.--._.
>
> > BlankDon't let the simple mind of the atheist ever fool you.
> > They hate God,and to hate something you must believe in it.
>
> No no no. You've got it all wrong. It's not YHWH I hate but rather the
> Easter Bunny. I hate him with a passion. If I ever see that flea
> bitten little rodent I'll push his stupid chocolate eggs right down
> his throat and kick his fluffy tail right back to the equinox. But the
> fairy in the Sky; he's harmless. No problem with him.
No no. It's Santa Claus who I hate. If he comes around again, I'll
take his goody bag and kick his big fat butt right up the chimney
again and make him clean the reindeer poop off my roof.
--
John Hachmann aa #1782
-The ability to change one's mind, ideas, and opinions when confronted with
new facts is the sign of the rational and intelligent. The inability to do
so is the hallmark of the dimwitted and the fanatic. This applies not only
to science and philosophy, but also to politics.-
Not sure I understand what you mean.
--
B. Catalano
www.alexamenos.com
Having grown up fundamentalist, I can attest to that. The insecurity could
be *palpable quite often.
I used to get in trouble with other fundies because I liked to hang out
with the Assembly of God students in college. After all, they were like
us. And even silly "doctrinal" differences threatened a lot of the people
I knew.
But I was raised in one of the original, old line fundamentalists
branches. Before people like Falwell hijacked the movement (I despised him
as much, if not more, back then than I do now). We were among the last of
the literalists. Like when the Bible said "judge not lest ye be judged,"
it *meant it.
Of course, now, that was one of the fatal flaws in my upbringing. Because
the more I was around people of differing denominations then differing
beliefs then even no real belief at all, I started noticing there wasn't
much difference. Especially when I saw a lot of what went on in the church
groups *behind all the public holy.
Started turning out "they" weren't as bad as I was told and "we" weren't
nearly so good as we said...
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
Alt-atheism website at: http://www.alt-atheism.org
-----------------------------------------------------------
"Often anger is a sign of engagement with life. People who
are angry are touched deeply by the events of their lives
and feel strongly about them....Anger is just a demand for
change, a passionate wish for things to be different....
And, as it was for me, it may be the first expression of
the will to live." -- Rachel Naomi Remen
Hm... we'd have to ask Liz about that. I don't know Lint would take a
garage. Unless maybe a raptured sock got snagged on it and it got drug
along?
INFIDEL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Be gone thou static cling!
>On Sat, 28 Aug 2004 23:38:04 -0400 in episode
><bt2dnV4wKZH...@comcast.com> we saw our hero "JTEM"
><jay...@gaydar.co.uk>:
>
>>
>> "Puck Greenman" <pu...@pooks.hill.fey> wrote
>>
>>> >Know what I hate? I hate giant purple unicorns that eat the tires off
>>> >my car.
>>> >
>>> >That's what I hate.
>>
>>> Then park your car in the garage, where they can't get at it.
>>
>> I don't have a garage. At first I thought I never had one, but then Mark
>> Blibo mentioned something about a "Rapture" taking his socks and leaving
>> dust bunnies, and I've been thinking that maybe I did have a garage and it
>> was raptured & stuff.
>>
>> I certainly have dust bunnies. I know 'cus I looked.
>>
>> Coincidence? I don't think so.
>
>Hm... we'd have to ask Liz about that. I don't know Lint would take a
>garage. Unless maybe a raptured sock got snagged on it and it got drug
>along?
Stranger things have been known to happen. I once knew a guy whose
garage spontaneously combusted, and it contained his washer and dryer!
So maybe your garage did get raptured although, for the life of me, I
don't know what Lint® would need with a garage unless he would need
someplace to store all the raptured socks. That's it! Sock storage.
Yes, Lint® revealed to me that he took JTEM's garage, albeit I'm
totally unsure about the role of the purple unicorns and the giant
dust bunnies. There might even be a parable in this story someplace.
Did any unexplained healings take place when the garage first went
missing?
Liz #658 BAAWA
"Lintanetics®" by L<dot> iz
>On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 03:34:08 +0000 in episode
><3oj2j0tr9hon0t6ai...@4ax.com> we saw our hero John Baker
><jba...@neo.rr.com>:
>
>> On Sat, 28 Aug 2004 07:38:57 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
>> <alt-a...@org.webmaster> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 28 Aug 2004 04:52:41 -0700 in episode
>>><78e3ae70.04082...@posting.google.com> we saw our hero
>>>papa...@cybertown.com (VoiceOfReason):
>>>
>>>> "JTEM" <jay...@gaydar.co.uk> wrote in message
>>>> news:<EvWdnd5x7Lr...@comcast.com>...
>>>>> "Atheist Bruiser" <Atheist...@Intelligence.com> wrote
>>>>>
>>>>> > BlankDon't let the simple mind of the atheist ever fool you. They
>>>>> > hate God,
>>>>>
>>>>> Know what I hate? I hate giant purple unicorns that eat the tires off
>>>>> my car.
>>>>>
>>>>> That's what I hate.
>>>>
>>>> I hate that reclusive little monster that keeps eating one sock at a
>>>> time and leaving dust bunny droppings under the furniture.
>>>
>>>That's not a "monster." That's Lint rapturing worthy socks that have
>>>attained paradise!
>>
>> Yeah. So *you* say.... <G>
>
>INFIDEL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
>Be gone thou static cling!
Think happy thoughts, Mark. We don't want another laundry jihad.
Just another believer with a chip on his shoulder. Ho hum....
Greg Czebatol
Gregwrld
agree in full line. This is a "social" "homogeneity" issue, against the
"black sheeps".
As my favorite philosphy professor used to observe, they
> like to think of atheists as the unshaven, miserable wretches one
> would see in Chick comics. A civilized and happy atheist means that
> one doesn't have to be Baptist/Pentecostal/whatever to be happy.
the atheist with a gun in one hand, and a bottle of whisky in the other.
> But their doctrine requires the whole package to be right, and
> unexamined. So if one part of their shaky faith is wrong, then...
if it were yet solid, they shouldn't have any motivations to obsessively
fight for it.
--
B. Catalano
www.alexamenos.com
Obviously the purple unicorns and the vile dust bunnies are working
against Lint! Verily, they are working to bring about the staining and the
static clinging. Not to mention the clogging of the holy dryer vent!
> On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 06:44:12 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
I dunno. After he posted his message, my towels came out neither downy nor
soft. I'm suspicious...
I think a novena is in order.
I hate when that happens. Maybe we ought to tumble him in the dryer
. . . just to be sure.
Ralf:
I agree with the above in large part. However, I think the clause
"particularly by bush supporters" is overstated. This year's policital
season in the U.S. has been unique in my experience and many folks on
both sides of the issue (Bush supporters and Bush detractors alike)
cannot view this election rationally. To single out one side of this row
is incorrect.
Ralf
--
-----------------------------------------------------------
* ^~^ ^~^ *
* _ {~ ~} {~ ~} _ *
* /_``>*< >*<''_\ *
* (\--_)++) (++(_--/) *
-----------------------------------------------------------
We must at all times stand in opposition to the entaglement
of religious authority with political power. The outcome is
invariably an abomination.
<chuckle> Do you think Lint has anything to do with the occasional
bumblebee that shows up in my dryer?
--
__________
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557
As it is writ, putting a screen on the outside of the dryer vent
prevents the occasional unwanted visitor. Before I was a follower of
Lint®, I didn't screen my vents, and an unfortunate chipmunk was
roasted in the vent bend. I found the poor desiccated creature after
being alerted by the smell. At least, his fur was nice and fluffy.
As long as your not de-frosting frozen chickens in there at the same time.
--
Jez
"The condition of alienation, of being asleep, of being unconscious,
of being out of one's mind, is the condition of the normal man. Society
highly values its normal man.It educates children to lose themselves
and to become absurd,and thus to be normal. Normal men have killed
perhaps 100,000,000 of their fellow normal men in the last fifty years."
R.D. Laing
snip
> ><chuckle> Do you think Lint has anything to do with the occasional
> >bumblebee that shows up in my dryer?
>
>
> As it is writ, putting a screen on the outside of the dryer vent
> prevents the occasional unwanted visitor. Before I was a follower of
> LintŽ, I didn't screen my vents, and an unfortunate chipmunk was
> roasted in the vent bend. I found the poor desiccated creature after
> being alerted by the smell. At least, his fur was nice and fluffy.
ACK! Oh dear. My little booger :(
Don't tell me. Have you actually done this?
Face it fool, you abandoned intelligence so fast you didn't even have time
to turn around and just did a Michael Jackson moon walk backwards at
breakneck speed. I won, end of story. Now come in here and honor your
master.
Snip
> Laundry, now that's an undeniable responsibility. Wish I still had
> someone else to do it though!
Damn, you just reminded me that I have to do a couple of loads today :P
We should name him after a gay porn magazine? Interesting :)
Ah ! Unfamiliar with the great Sir Henry Rawlinson I see !
Tut Tut !
So you've also missed the classic :
'Like the shock of fondling a raw sausage at a gay party' then...
Man ! Thats a shame !
try
http://www.rawlinsonend.org.uk/
http://basic1.easily.co.uk/03C052/042055/
for some backround...
Full transcript..........
http://www.iankitching.me.uk/music/bonzos/tracks/share-album.htmlx
There used to be a better version..this one seems to have all the HTML
tags...
But if you copy it all and paste into a html editor...it looks ok.
Better still get the album, where you have Vivian Stanshalls amazingly
rich voice narrating !
A classic piece of work.
<snip for brevity>
: >> Why do they have to say we 'hate'......are they so threatened by
Ralf:
I also came out of a fundamentalist background, saved, washed of my sins
in the blood of the lamb, and all of that. I was a true believer, so
much so that some felt I was overly spiritual (it was once pointed out
to me that I was so spritually minded that I was no worldly good to
which I rejoined that's better than being so worldly minded I am no
spiritually good - I was irritatingly devout at that time). My salvation
was genuine and if the doctrine of "once saved, always saved" is
correct, I'm in good shape (however, if my last church from that period
is correct, that salvation can be lost, my condition becomes a tad more
difficult).
A big part of my abandoning that faith was similar to what you've
expressed above - when I looked around at folks from other religious
persuasions, I found it insupportable that God would condemn people who
were obviously decent, moral folk simply because they belonged to the
"wrong" religion. Why would it be that if Jesus came to save the world
by dieing for our sins that he would reject most of the world simply
because they don't accept the Christian religion. It was that
observation that put me on the slippery slope to where I finally came to
reject the teachings of my youth (and not without considerable
trepidation I should note - the fear of hell and eternal damnation is a
powerful weapon fundamentalists use to keep the faithful in line).
Ralf:
--
-------------------------------------------------------------
* ^~^ ^~^ *
* _ {~ ~} {~ ~} _ *
* /_``>*< >*<''_\ *
* (\--_)++) (++(_--/) *
-------------------------------------------------------------
Those who assert that scripture is inerrant or is to be
understood literally invariably find themselves confronted
with the need to ignore or distort the plain meaning of the
text. In the process, they change the scriptures to bring
them into conformance with their doctrine rather than
modifying their doctrine to bring it into conformance with
scripture.
Gawd I even got that wrong....
Should be........'Like the shock of fondling a raw sausage, blindfold,
at a gay party.'
Typical !
Currently broadcasting Sir Henry at
http://www.jetaudio.com/jetcast_directory/StreamFile/403910.pls
should be up for an hour or two
Hehe !
What did you "won"? And how? Don't you see you assholeness is showing?
--
B. Catalano
www.alexamenos.com
I forgot....
*PLONK*
--
B. Catalano
www.alexamenos.com
>In article <7jTXc.55$h43....@news.uswest.net>,
> "Atheist Bruiser" <Atheist...@Intelligence.com> wrote:
>
>> BlankDon't let the simple mind of the atheist ever fool you.
>> They hate God,and to hate something you must believe in it.
>
>*
>I'll go along with that! You say, "...to hate something you must
>believe in it."
>
>That's true. And if you don't believe in it you cannot hate it.
>Hating God is like hating the Tooth Fairy or Paul Bunyan. Your God
>is just another on the list of fictitious characters.
>
>To me, it's not a matter of hate or love or whatever -- to me, God
>is just not relevant. The subject just doesn't come up. This was
>not always true. As an eight-year-old, I memorized my Bible verses
>with the best of them. In fact, I was the star of the class --
>reading the entire Bible twice!
>
>But then something happened. I began my education. The role of the
>Sunday School and Church is indoctrination. The role of the school
>and university is education. There is a big difference.
>
>I went into science and studied mathematics, chemistry, biology and
>physics. By the time I was about 18, I was fairly certain that what
>I learned in Sunday School came into direct conflict with what I
>learned in Biology and Physics. They could not possible both be
>true.
>
>And I had to make a decision between the religious indoctrination of
>the church, and the scientifically logical education of the
>university.
>
>The decision was not hard.
>
>At first, I called myself an agnostic and later, atheist. I have
>been an atheist now for over 50 years and it seems to work. I have
>several degrees from major US universities -- I worked for about 40
>years in scientific research -- mostly in the bioengineering area.
>I am now retired, living in a big home on a beautiful acre on top of
>a hill in the San Francisco Bay area.
>
>I am an extremely moral person, giving my money, and more
>importantly, my time, to the good of my fellow man. I lead disabled
>children on guided walks along the northern California coast.
>
>At the age of 73, I probably won't be around much longer. But
>that's OK, too. I'm not going to hell -- in spite of what you might
>think. Neither am I going to that heaven up in the sky.
>
>Here's a question: Why do you call yourself 'Atheist Bruiser'? Is
>that because you bruise atheists? Why would you want to bruise
>someone like me? In your opinion, I suspect you think I am bound
>for the fires of hell forever. Isn't that enough punishment? Do
>you want to bruise me before I get there?
>
>Do you have a real name?
>
>earle
>*
> "Evolution does not require the nonexistence of God,
> it merely allows for it. That alone is enough to evoke
> condemnation from those who fear the nonexistence of God
> more than they fear God Himself."--Keith Doyle
Nice explanation, Earle. I don't have the same accomplishments, but I
do have similar ideals. Being an atheist helps a lot.
Clothaire #1392
"The history of intellectual progress is written in the lives of
infidels." --Ingersoll
>
> Face it fool, you abandoned intelligence so fast you didn't even have time
> to turn around and just did a Michael Jackson moon walk backwards at
> breakneck speed. I won, end of story. Now come in here and honor your
> master.
You are a cretin.
And you most certainly aren't witty.
Take this to sort of infantile crap to alt.flame
--
Senator Waxman's searchable database of iraq war lies.
www.house.gov/reform/min/features/iraq_on_the_record/
A good portal to more lies and Bush stupidity is to be found at
www.failureisimpossible.com - Go to the index and go to
"L" for lies. All you need to know about Bush when you
step into the voting booth. Bush is a liar and surrounds
himself with fellow liars.
Cheerful Charlie
You must be a youngster then. This is only different from the Reagan
elelctions in degree (and not by much), not in tone.
jwk
Part one is to collect the underpants.
Part three is profit.
Can't remember what part two is, but my don't Robyn's underpants smell good?
jwk
And if Mark was George "duh-bya" Bush, he would attack me for this even
though I had nothing to do with it.
"Robibnikoff" <witc...@broomstick.com> wrote in message
news:2pee30F...@uni-berlin.de...
Ralf:
That depends of course of what you mean by "youngster". I was first
eliglble to vote during the Carter/Ford election (actually a few years
before that, but I'm speaking here of US presidential elections), but I
did not actually start to vote until either the 1st or 2nd Reagan
election. I was not paying as much attention to the electoral process
then as I do now (drugs played a big part in that) and so, no, I don't
recall one way or the other how the current election cycle compares to
those elections.
Ralf
--
-------------------------------------------------------------
* ^~^ ^~^ *
* _ {| |} {| |} _ *
* /_``>*< >*<''_\ *
* (\--_)++) (++(_--/) *
-------------------------------------------------------------
Nature is the canvas of creation and evolution but one of
the brushes. Religion points to the mind of God; Science
reveals its unfolding. The subjective apprehends knowledge
while the objective facilitates understanding.
In all things, yin and yang - ever flowing, one into the
other; always overtaking, always overtaken.
> On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 20:51:32 -0700 the ET form known as Atheist
> Bruiser<Atheist...@Intelligence.com> sent a radio signal across
> the vast expanse of deep space -._.--._.--._.--._.--._.--._.
>
>> BlankDon't let the simple mind of the atheist ever fool you.
>> They hate God,and to hate something you must believe in it.
>
> No no no. You've got it all wrong. It's not YHWH I hate but rather the
> Easter Bunny. I hate him with a passion. If I ever see that flea
> bitten little rodent I'll push his stupid chocolate eggs right down
> his throat and kick his fluffy tail right back to the equinox.
Hey watch it bud. Bunnies are not rodents ya know. They are Lagomorphs.
The Easter Bunny will deny you chocolate for all time!!
> But the
> fairy in the Sky; he's harmless. No problem with him.
>
What about that giant carrot thingy?
LK.
snip
> >>As long as your not de-frosting frozen chickens in there at the same
time.
> >
> >
> > Don't tell me. Have you actually done this?
>
> Ah ! Unfamiliar with the great Sir Henry Rawlinson I see !
Consider me unenlightened ;)
> Tut Tut !
A thousand pardons, my dear sir :)
>
> So you've also missed the classic :
> 'Like the shock of fondling a raw sausage at a gay party' then...
SNARK! Deary me.
> Man ! Thats a shame !
>
> try
> http://www.rawlinsonend.org.uk/
>
> http://basic1.easily.co.uk/03C052/042055/
>
> for some backround...
Thanks!
>
>
> Full transcript..........
>
> http://www.iankitching.me.uk/music/bonzos/tracks/share-album.htmlx
>
> There used to be a better version..this one seems to have all the HTML
> tags...
>
> But if you copy it all and paste into a html editor...it looks ok.
>
> Better still get the album, where you have Vivian Stanshalls amazingly
> rich voice narrating !
> A classic piece of work.
Excellent. Thanks, I'll definitely check into it :)
HEY!!!!!
I guess I forgot to mention that it's my KID'S underpants that are
disappearing!!!!!!!! ;)
Thank you, thank you. We'll be here all week. Don't forget to tip your
waitress! :)
That and he'll bring you vomit-flavored Bertie Botts instead of your garden
variety jelly beans :)
> On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 11:04:43 -0400, "Robibnikoff"
Oh great. I feel really guilty for laughing...
--
Mark K. Bilbo - a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
Alt-atheism website at: http://www.alt-atheism.org
-----------------------------------------------------------
"Often anger is a sign of engagement with life. People who
are angry are touched deeply by the events of their lives
and feel strongly about them....Anger is just a demand for
change, a passionate wish for things to be different....
And, as it was for me, it may be the first expression of
the will to live." -- Rachel Naomi Remen
> On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 08:36:55 -0500, "Mark K. Bilbo"
> <alt-a...@org.webmaster> in news message
> <k-adnXYgR_d...@megapath.net> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 12:10:02 +0000 in episode
>><57i3j0l8t4b7f4fve...@4ax.com> we saw our hero Liz
>><ehu...@donotspam.com>:
>>
>>I dunno. After he posted his message, my towels came out neither downy
>>nor soft. I'm suspicious...
>
>
> I hate when that happens. Maybe we ought to tumble him in the dryer . . .
> just to be sure.
I dunno. After the chipmunk incident, I'm kinda scared of your dryer...
I'm backing slooowly away from that one...
>
> <AnotherObserver®> wrote in message
> news:tt42j0tjahrkiq10q...@4ax.com...
>
> Snip
>
>> Laundry, now that's an undeniable responsibility. Wish I still had
>> someone else to do it though!
>
> Damn, you just reminded me that I have to do a couple of loads today :P
And I gotta petition Lint about some grass stains.
(My back is back so I have yard work to catch up on, my Saturday was
dedicated to edging)
LOL - And so you should! :)
Wise move, Grasshopper <cough> ;)
Can I hire you to do something with my yard? The husband's a cool dude, but
doesn't do diddley yard-wise :)
It's okay, really. It was a long time ago, and it was a very, very
old chipmunk. That's old in chipmunk years . . . relatively
speaking. We held a funeral for him. Everyone stood around the
shoebox and remarked, "He really does look fluffy."
You've got to be the coolest mother/gramma on the planet :)
Here. Allow me to prove it:
Suppose I claimed there was a dinosuar on my front
step right now. No, not an image of a dinosaur, or any
kind toy/depiction, but a real live dinosaur standing
on my front step.
Well, maybe not entirely. My front step isn't very large,
but this real live dinosaur is certaily within the vicinity
of my front step.
What could you say here to disprove me?
What URL or quote could you provide that would disprove
my claim?
Nothing. You couldn't do. And, no, don't make any claims
about being able to visit my front step and seeing first-hand
that there's no dinsaur there.
Unless EVERYBODY visited my front step, they'd still only
have your word to go on.
Photos? They can be faked. Besides, how do they know the
photo is REALLY of my front step? They'd have to know
what my front step looks like, and they'd have to have reason
to believe that the photo was taken now, while the dinosaur
is out there, and wasn't taken some time weeks ago.
Okay, cutting this off & getting to the point: You can't do it!
You can't disprove my claim that there is a dinosaur sitting
on my front step (or within the vicinity there of). Not here.
Not now. It just can't be done. My claim can't be disproven.
But that wouldn't bother you, would you? It wouldn't make
you stop & think that maybe, just maybe, there really is a
dinosaur on my front step.
Why?
Because of that whole "Proving a negative" thing. Failing to
disprove isn't "Proving," or else I just "Proved" that there's
a living, breathing dinosaur on my front step. So the fact that
you couldn't DISPROVE that there's a dinosaur on my front
step wouldn't & couldn't be considered "Proof" or even
"Evidence" that there's a dinosaur on my front step.
So why do you Evolutionists suddenly take the exact opposite
approach when it comes to creationism or Intelligent Design?
Don't bother. I mean, don't even bother trying to answer
because you'd only lie. You have a double standard, you
evolutionists, and I just "Proved" it.
>
>Evolutionists are cranks who invented a myth that
>they call "Science."
>
>Here. Allow me to prove it:
>
>Suppose I claimed there was a dinosuar on my front
>step right now. No, not an image of a dinosaur, or any
>kind toy/depiction, but a real live dinosaur standing
>on my front step.
>
>Well, maybe not entirely. My front step isn't very large,
>but this real live dinosaur is certaily within the vicinity
>of my front step.
>
>What could you say here to disprove me?
What's to disprove? Real live breathing dinosaurs regularly
congregate on my windowsill, where I leave sunflower seeds for them.
Kronk
>
> Evolutionists are cranks who invented a myth that
> they call "Science."
>
> Here. Allow me to prove it:
>
> Suppose I claimed there was a dinosuar on my front
> step right now. No, not an image of a dinosaur, or any
> kind toy/depiction, but a real live dinosaur standing
> on my front step.
>
> Well, maybe not entirely. My front step isn't very large,
> but this real live dinosaur is certaily within the vicinity
> of my front step.
>
> What could you say here to disprove me?
Nothing. I wouldn't need to disprove such an unlikely claim. The fact
that you choose to attack such a silly strawman shows that you are in
way over your head when trying to talk about science.
You have my sympathy.
--
Nemo - EAC Commissioner for Bible Belt Underwater Operations.
Atheist #1331 (the Palindrome of doom!)
BAAWA Knight! - One of those warm Southern Knights, y'all!
Charter member, SMASH!!
http://home.earthlink.net/~jehdjh/Relpg.html
Draco Dormiens Nunquam Titillandus
Quotemeister since March 2002
[-----]
>So why do you Evolutionists suddenly take the exact opposite
>approach when it comes to creationism or Intelligent Design?
>
>Don't bother. I mean, don't even bother trying to answer
>because you'd only lie. You have a double standard, you
>evolutionists, and I just "Proved" it.
That's an interesting approach. I was going to answer, but it is
obvious that you don't want the correct answer. You have declared
that it is more important for you to continue to believe in your
presuppositions, including, it seems, that a dinosaur is on your front
porch, than it is for you to learn to distinguish fact from fantasy.
I will leave you to your misrepresentations and ignorance with this
caveat: Unsupported claims have no place in science.
Liz #658 BAAWA
One of the principal differences between science and religion
is that science acknowledges that it is the creation of humankind
and, thus, welcomes correction. Religion does not and cannot. --
George Ricker