He have been told this multiple times so why does he keep lying about
it?
What makes the sociopathic moron so dishonest he "argues" using such
transparently dishonest analogies?
Gravitons are a theoretical explanation for gravity which nobody
imagines are real, love us and tell us we should worship them or
suffer infinite torment etc.
Nor do graviton believers wipe them in our faces all day and every day
even after they have been told to put up or shut the fuck up about
them.
String theory is an untested mathematical model for the universe.
Nobody imagines branes are real, love us and tell us we should worship
them or suffer infinite torment etc.
Nor do string theory believers wipe them in our faces all day and
every day even after they have been told to put up or shut the fuck up
about them.
There is nothing whatsoever that suggests a cosmic consciousness - he
has plucked it out of his arse.
But they do wipe it in our faces with such regularity they get told to
put up or shut up .
And until he demonstrates otherwise God remains merely one of
thousands of different, incompatible religious BELIEFS and not
substantively different from all the others - they're ALL the result
of religious brainwashing, and they're ALL only special to their
believers who for some reason have a compulsion to wipe it in
everybody else's faces whether or not they're interested.
The in-your-face, aggressively stupid, non-stop, lying bullshit
merchant knows this.
If he had demonstrated "cosmic consciousness" with the kind of
evidence there is for gravity, of this hypothetical God with as much
evidence as there is for the universe then he might have a point.
But he hadn't, and he hasn't.
He isn't just a moron, there is somethoing seriously wrong with him.
He's like a real-life Hyacinth Bucket (pronounced Bouquet) but orders
of magnitude worse, that everybody crosses the road to avoid, or goes
to the next pub down the road when she enters the bar, the kind of
non-stop, in-your-face, obsessive crackpot on a mission that everybody
crosses the road to avoid.
>Why do you care? You are obviously incapable of comprehending either one.
>
>My question was and still is, why do cretins such as yourself spend time
>and resources blathering about your imaginary superfriend while
>energetically dodging requests for evidence for the existence of that
>critter? (Citations of "the miracle of birth" and references to propaganda
>books do not count as evidence).
The moron will never answer this.
And he is too stupid to understand why people demand proof from him.