> SkyEyes <skyey...@cox.net> wrote in news:095a05d7-f3e4-4bb8-bd38-
> 911c7c207...@m5g2000pbv.googlegroups.com:
> > On Oct 26, 2:17 pm, RD Sandman <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net>
> > wrote:
> >> "Syd M." <pauldavidwri...@yahoo.com> wrote innews:23a6ef12-8af6-41ce-
> b939
> > -fa5f5bd6c...@v9g2000yql.googlegroups.com:
> >> > On Oct 26, 4:55 pm, Phlip <phlip2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> On Oct 26, 1:40 pm, "Syd M." <pauldavidwri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> >> > On Oct 26, 4:38 pm, Kurt Nicklas <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> > > I won't be voting against Barrack Hussein Obama because I'm white
> >> >> > > and he's black.
> >> >> > > I'm voting against him because he's incompetent.
> >> >> > So, why did you continue to vote FOR your hero, GW Bush?
> >> >> > He was FAR more incompetent then Obama.
> >> >> Maybe he thinks Obama is a Socialist.
> >> >> So he's going for the guy who made his billions looting perfectly
> >> >> good companies, and exporting their jobs to Red China...
> >> > Nobody said these rightards werre intelligent...
> >> ROFLMAO!!! How much did you make in a year? How much are you worth?
> > Stop conflating riches with virtue. Riches tend, in this context, to
> > be an indication of *lack of* virtue.
> > Brenda Nelson, A.A.#34 and A+ atheist
> > BAAWA Knight of the Golden Litterbox
> > EAC Professor of Feline Thermometrics and Cat-Herding
> > skyeyes nine at cox dot net OR
> > skyeyes nine at yahoo dot com
> And you keep conflating wealth with evil and poverty with good.
I can't help myself, I was brought up to be a fundamentalist
christian. It's what I was taught. "It is easier for a camel to go
through the eye of a needle than it is for a rich man to get into
heaven." "Lay not up for yourselves treasures on Earth, where moth
and rust doth corrupt, and thieves break in and steal; but lay up for
yourselves treasures in Heaven." Etc., etc., etc. While I no longer
believe in the superstition, I still very much believe in the moral
stance.
Brenda Nelson, A.A.#34 and A+ atheist
BAAWA Knight of the Golden Litterbox
EAC Professor of Feline Thermometrics and Cat-Herding
skyeyes nine at cox dot net OR
skyeyes nine at yahoo dot com
> >>>>>>> Hey you fat, stupid fuck. Are you counting the latest 4 Americans
> >>>>>>> dead in your total?
> >>>>>>Were you one of them? No?
> >>>>>>Pity.
> >>>>> Ah yes, liberal tolerance
> >>>> You're still alive, aren't you?
> >>>> Then stop whining that you don't get the tolerance you deserve. You
> >>>> do.
> >>> Any time you feel man enough chuckles...
> >> Do I feel man enough to tolerate your existence?
> >> Why, yes, I do...
> >> But that doesn't mean I can't point out what an abjectly stupid clown you
> >> are.
> >Actually fuckwit, I meant if you feel man enough that you don't want to
> >tol;erate me anymoer you should take action.
> Why would I do a silly thing like that, bubbles?
> You're threatened because I refuse to threaten you?
> That's an interesting reality you're living in there.
Threats are the only things GG understands.
Brenda Nelson, A.A.#34 and A+ atheist
BAAWA Knight of the Golden Litterbox
EAC Professor of Feline Thermometrics and Cat-Herding
skyeyes nine at cox dot net OR
skyeyes nine at yahoo dot com
> On Oct 27, 8:14 am, Gray Guest <No_email_for_...@wahoo.com> wrote:
>> SkyEyes <skyey...@cox.net> wrote in news:095a05d7-f3e4-4bb8-bd38-
>> 911c7c207...@m5g2000pbv.googlegroups.com:
>> > On Oct 26, 2:17 pm, RD Sandman <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net>
>> > wrote:
>> >> "Syd M." <pauldavidwri...@yahoo.com> wrote innews:23a6ef12-8af6-41ce-
>> b939
>> > -fa5f5bd6c...@v9g2000yql.googlegroups.com:
>> >> > On Oct 26, 4:55 pm, Phlip <phlip2...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> On Oct 26, 1:40 pm, "Syd M." <pauldavidwri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >> >> > On Oct 26, 4:38 pm, Kurt Nicklas <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> > > I won't be voting against Barrack Hussein Obama because I'm whi
> te
>> >> >> > > and he's black.
>> >> >> > > I'm voting against him because he's incompetent.
>> >> >> > So, why did you continue to vote FOR your hero, GW Bush?
>> >> >> > He was FAR more incompetent then Obama.
>> >> >> Maybe he thinks Obama is a Socialist.
>> >> >> So he's going for the guy who made his billions looting perfectly
>> >> >> good companies, and exporting their jobs to Red China...
>> >> > Nobody said these rightards werre intelligent...
>> >> ROFLMAO!!! How much did you make in a year? How much are you wor
> th?
>> > Stop conflating riches with virtue. Riches tend, in this context, to
>> > be an indication of *lack of* virtue.
>> > Brenda Nelson, A.A.#34 and A+ atheist
>> > BAAWA Knight of the Golden Litterbox
>> > EAC Professor of Feline Thermometrics and Cat-Herding
>> > skyeyes nine at cox dot net OR
>> > skyeyes nine at yahoo dot com
>> And you keep conflating wealth with evil and poverty with good.
> I can't help myself, I was brought up to be a fundamentalist
> christian. It's what I was taught. "It is easier for a camel to go
> through the eye of a needle than it is for a rich man to get into
> heaven." "Lay not up for yourselves treasures on Earth, where moth
> and rust doth corrupt, and thieves break in and steal; but lay up for
> yourselves treasures in Heaven." Etc., etc., etc. While I no longer
> believe in the superstition, I still very much believe in the moral
> stance.
> Brenda Nelson, A.A.#34 and A+ atheist
> BAAWA Knight of the Golden Litterbox
> EAC Professor of Feline Thermometrics and Cat-Herding
> skyeyes nine at cox dot net OR
> skyeyes nine at yahoo dot com
Awwww. And I thought you couldn't impose your morality on another.
It seems you can.
-- Refusenik #1
Libs suffer from Eleutherophobia. And there is no cure.
>> >>>>>>> Hey you fat, stupid fuck. Are you counting the latest 4 Americans
>> >>>>>>> dead in your total?
>> >>>>>>Were you one of them? No?
>> >>>>>>Pity.
>> >>>>> Ah yes, liberal tolerance
>> >>>> You're still alive, aren't you?
>> >>>> Then stop whining that you don't get the tolerance you deserve. Y
> ou
>> >>>> do.
>> >>> Any time you feel man enough chuckles...
>> >> Do I feel man enough to tolerate your existence?
>> >> Why, yes, I do...
>> >> But that doesn't mean I can't point out what an abjectly stupid clown > you
>> >> are.
>> >Actually fuckwit, I meant if you feel man enough that you don't want to
>> >tol;erate me anymoer you should take action.
>> Why would I do a silly thing like that, bubbles?
>> You're threatened because I refuse to threaten you?
>> That's an interesting reality you're living in there.
> Threats are the only things GG understands.
> Brenda Nelson, A.A.#34 and A+ atheist
> BAAWA Knight of the Golden Litterbox
> EAC Professor of Feline Thermometrics and Cat-Herding
> skyeyes nine at cox dot net OR
> skyeyes nine at yahoo dot com
Especially the threat to my life, liberty and pursuit of happiness that you lefty dirtbags are pushing.
-- Refusenik #1
Libs suffer from Eleutherophobia. And there is no cure.
>>>>>> RD Sandman wrote:
>>>>>>> Phlip <phlip2...@gmail.com> wrote in news:c53a0f23-9d7c-45fd-8086-
>>>>>>> b77cd2e03...@sh1g2000pbc.googlegroups.com:
>>>>>>>> So he's going for the guy who made his billions looting perfectly
>>>>> good
>>>>>>>> companies, and exporting their jobs to Red China...
>>>>>>> Surely you exaggerate......Romney is only worth about $250 million.
>>>>>> It's the same lib math by which folks earning $250,000 are called
>>>>>> "millionaires" by Obama who need to "pay their fair share."
>>>>> You forgot that both he and Biden refer to those folks as
>>>>> "millionaires and billionaires". ;)
>>>>How much extra tax will someone making $251K a year be paying?
>>> Ever considered this? All people are equal.....
>>> What a novel concept.
>>Which is why the rich should be paying at least the same percentage of >>their discretionary income as the poor.
>No,everyone should pay at the same rate.
Forget it. You'll never convince leftists that everyone paying the
same rate is fair. They define "fair" much differently than normal
people.
Even though we know that by paying the same rate, rich people pay more
in taxes, that's not good enough for them.
Now they want to decide what is "discretionary." Can you imagine what
a clusterfuck THAT would be? The government deciding what you "need?"
>>>>>>> RD Sandman wrote:
>>>>>>>> Phlip <phlip2...@gmail.com> wrote in news:c53a0f23-9d7c-45fd-8086-
>>>>>>>> b77cd2e03...@sh1g2000pbc.googlegroups.com:
>>>>>>>>> So he's going for the guy who made his billions looting perfectly
>>>>>> good
>>>>>>>>> companies, and exporting their jobs to Red China...
>>>>>>>> Surely you exaggerate......Romney is only worth about $250 million.
>>>>>>> It's the same lib math by which folks earning $250,000 are called
>>>>>>> "millionaires" by Obama who need to "pay their fair share."
>>>>>> You forgot that both he and Biden refer to those folks as
>>>>>> "millionaires and billionaires". ;)
>>>>>How much extra tax will someone making $251K a year be paying?
>>>> Ever considered this? All people are equal.....
>>>> What a novel concept.
>>>Which is why the rich should be paying at least the same percentage of >>>their discretionary income as the poor.
>>No,everyone should pay at the same rate.
>Forget it. You'll never convince leftists that everyone paying the
>same rate is fair. They define "fair" much differently than normal
>people.
>Even though we know that by paying the same rate, rich people pay more
>in taxes, that's not good enough for them.
That is exactly why I have issues with liberals - they do not believe
in the basic American tenets of freedom.
>Now they want to decide what is "discretionary." Can you imagine what
>a clusterfuck THAT would be? The government deciding what you "need?"
On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 08:54:11 -0500, ozarkheart wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 06:05:38 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude
> <klausschadenfre...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>ozarkhe...@yahoo.com wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>>>On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 20:14:48 +0000 (UTC), 3216 Dead <d...@gone.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>>On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 15:13:40 -0500, ozarkheart wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 19:14:07 +0000 (UTC), 3216 Dead <d...@gone.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 13:38:07 -0500, RD Sandman wrote:
>>>>>>>> RD Sandman wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Phlip <phlip2...@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>>>>> news:c53a0f23-9d7c-45fd-8086-
>>>>>>>>> b77cd2e03...@sh1g2000pbc.googlegroups.com:
>>>>>>>>>> So he's going for the guy who made his billions looting
>>>>>>>>>> perfectly
>>>>>>> good
>>>>>>>>>> companies, and exporting their jobs to Red China...
>>>>>>>>> Surely you exaggerate......Romney is only worth about $250
>>>>>>>>> million.
>>>>>>>> It's the same lib math by which folks earning $250,000 are called
>>>>>>>> "millionaires" by Obama who need to "pay their fair share."
>>>>>>> You forgot that both he and Biden refer to those folks as
>>>>>>> "millionaires and billionaires". ;)
>>>>>>How much extra tax will someone making $251K a year be paying?
>>>>> Ever considered this? All people are equal.....
>>>>> What a novel concept.
>>>>Which is why the rich should be paying at least the same percentage of
>>>>their discretionary income as the poor.
>>>No,everyone should pay at the same rate.
>>Forget it. You'll never convince leftists that everyone paying the same
>>rate is fair. They define "fair" much differently than normal people.
>>Even though we know that by paying the same rate, rich people pay more
>>in taxes, that's not good enough for them.
> That is exactly why I have issues with liberals - they do not believe in
> the basic American tenets of freedom.
The most basic tenet is that the American people serve themselves, and not rich masters.
>>>>>>>>> RD Sandman wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Phlip <phlip2...@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>> news:c53a0f23-9d7c-45fd-8086-
>>>>>>>>>> b77cd2e03...@sh1g2000pbc.googlegroups.com:
>>>>>>>>>>> So he's going for the guy who made his billions looting
>>>>>>>>>>> perfectly
>>>>>>>> good
>>>>>>>>>>> companies, and exporting their jobs to Red China...
>>>>>>>>>> Surely you exaggerate......Romney is only worth about $250
>>>>>>>>>> million.
>>>>>>>>> It's the same lib math by which folks earning $250,000 are called
>>>>>>>>> "millionaires" by Obama who need to "pay their fair share."
>>>>>>>> You forgot that both he and Biden refer to those folks as
>>>>>>>> "millionaires and billionaires". ;)
>>>>>>>How much extra tax will someone making $251K a year be paying?
>>>>>> Ever considered this? All people are equal.....
>>>>>> What a novel concept.
>>>>>Which is why the rich should be paying at least the same percentage of
>>>>>their discretionary income as the poor.
>>>>No,everyone should pay at the same rate.
>>>Forget it. You'll never convince leftists that everyone paying the same
>>>rate is fair. They define "fair" much differently than normal people.
>>>Even though we know that by paying the same rate, rich people pay more
>>>in taxes, that's not good enough for them.
>> That is exactly why I have issues with liberals - they do not believe in
>> the basic American tenets of freedom.
>The most basic tenet is that the American people serve themselves, and >not rich masters.
"Serve themselves." WTF does that mean? How does that translate into
robbing people?
Wanna try again in English this time?
>>>Now they want to decide what is "discretionary." Can you imagine what a
>>>clusterfuck THAT would be? The government deciding what you "need?"
On 10/28/2012 10:59 AM, flawed shrieking fraud whined/opined:
> 3216 Dead replied with a simple concept:
>> On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 08:54:11 -0500, ozarkheart writhed in denials:
...
>>> That is exactly why I have issues with liberals - they do not
>>> believe in the basic American tenets of freedom.
>> The most basic tenet is that the American people serve themselves,
>> and not rich masters.
> "Serve themselves." WTF does that mean?
It means that 'freedom' is not equivalent to 'economic serfdom'..
--Why this simple concept escapes your comprehension is laughable..
> SkyEyes <skyey...@cox.net> wrote in news:17cae6ad-1884-4ff5-899d-
> bd2a50f00...@mq1g2000pbb.googlegroups.com:
> > On Oct 27, 8:14 am, Gray Guest <No_email_for_...@wahoo.com> wrote:
> >> SkyEyes <skyey...@cox.net> wrote in news:095a05d7-f3e4-4bb8-bd38-
> >> 911c7c207...@m5g2000pbv.googlegroups.com:
> >> > On Oct 26, 2:17 pm, RD Sandman <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >> "Syd M." <pauldavidwri...@yahoo.com> wrote innews:23a6ef12-8af6-41ce-
> >> b939
> >> > -fa5f5bd6c...@v9g2000yql.googlegroups.com:
> >> >> > On Oct 26, 4:55 pm, Phlip <phlip2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> On Oct 26, 1:40 pm, "Syd M." <pauldavidwri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> > On Oct 26, 4:38 pm, Kurt Nicklas <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> > > I won't be voting against Barrack Hussein Obama because I'm
> whi
> > te
> >> >> >> > > and he's black.
> >> >> >> > > I'm voting against him because he's incompetent.
> >> >> >> > So, why did you continue to vote FOR your hero, GW Bush?
> >> >> >> > He was FAR more incompetent then Obama.
> >> >> >> Maybe he thinks Obama is a Socialist.
> >> >> >> So he's going for the guy who made his billions looting perfectly
> >> >> >> good companies, and exporting their jobs to Red China...
> >> >> > Nobody said these rightards werre intelligent...
> >> >> ROFLMAO!!! How much did you make in a year? How much are you wor
> > th?
> >> > Stop conflating riches with virtue. Riches tend, in this context, to
> >> > be an indication of *lack of* virtue.
> >> > Brenda Nelson, A.A.#34 and A+ atheist
> >> > BAAWA Knight of the Golden Litterbox
> >> > EAC Professor of Feline Thermometrics and Cat-Herding
> >> > skyeyes nine at cox dot net OR
> >> > skyeyes nine at yahoo dot com
> >> And you keep conflating wealth with evil and poverty with good.
> > I can't help myself, I was brought up to be a fundamentalist
> > christian. It's what I was taught. "It is easier for a camel to go
> > through the eye of a needle than it is for a rich man to get into
> > heaven." "Lay not up for yourselves treasures on Earth, where moth
> > and rust doth corrupt, and thieves break in and steal; but lay up for
> > yourselves treasures in Heaven." Etc., etc., etc. While I no longer
> > believe in the superstition, I still very much believe in the moral
> > stance.
> > Brenda Nelson, A.A.#34 and A+ atheist
> > BAAWA Knight of the Golden Litterbox
> > EAC Professor of Feline Thermometrics and Cat-Herding
> > skyeyes nine at cox dot net OR
> > skyeyes nine at yahoo dot com
> Awwww. And I thought you couldn't impose your morality on another.
> It seems you can.
Hard not to do, isn't it? Nevertheless, one is obliged to make the
effort.
Brenda Nelson, A.A.#34 and A+ atheist
BAAWA Knight of the Golden Litterbox
EAC Professor of Feline Thermometrics and Cat-Herding
skyeyes nine at cox dot net OR
skyeyes nine at yahoo dot com
> >> >>>>>>> Hey you fat, stupid fuck. Are you counting the latest 4
> Americans
> >> >>>>>>> dead in your total?
> >> >>>>>>Were you one of them? No?
> >> >>>>>>Pity.
> >> >>>>> Ah yes, liberal tolerance
> >> >>>> You're still alive, aren't you?
> >> >>>> Then stop whining that you don't get the tolerance you deserve. Y
> > ou
> >> >>>> do.
> >> >>> Any time you feel man enough chuckles...
> >> >> Do I feel man enough to tolerate your existence?
> >> >> Why, yes, I do...
> >> >> But that doesn't mean I can't point out what an abjectly stupid clown
> > you
> >> >> are.
> >> >Actually fuckwit, I meant if you feel man enough that you don't want to
> >> >tol;erate me anymoer you should take action.
> >> Why would I do a silly thing like that, bubbles?
> >> You're threatened because I refuse to threaten you?
> >> That's an interesting reality you're living in there.
> > Threats are the only things GG understands.
> > Brenda Nelson, A.A.#34 and A+ atheist
> > BAAWA Knight of the Golden Litterbox
> > EAC Professor of Feline Thermometrics and Cat-Herding
> > skyeyes nine at cox dot net OR
> > skyeyes nine at yahoo dot com
> Especially the threat to my life, liberty and pursuit of happiness that you
> lefty dirtbags are pushing.
No one is threatening your life, liberty or pursuit of happiness,
cupcake. Unless, of course, you perceive it that *our* pursuit of
those things threatens yours.
Brenda Nelson, A.A.#34 and A+ atheist
BAAWA Knight of the Golden Litterbox
EAC Professor of Feline Thermometrics and Cat-Herding
skyeyes nine at cox dot net OR
skyeyes nine at yahoo dot com
>>>>>>> RD Sandman wrote:
>>>>>>>> Phlip <phlip2...@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>>>> news:c53a0f23-9d7c-45fd-8086-
>>>>>>>> b77cd2e03...@sh1g2000pbc.googlegroups.com:
>>>>>>>>> So he's going for the guy who made his billions looting
>>>>>>>>> perfectly
>>>>>> good
>>>>>>>>> companies, and exporting their jobs to Red China...
>>>>>>>> Surely you exaggerate......Romney is only worth about $250
>>>>>>>> million.
>>>>>>> It's the same lib math by which folks earning $250,000 are called
>>>>>>> "millionaires" by Obama who need to "pay their fair share."
>>>>>> You forgot that both he and Biden refer to those folks as
>>>>>> "millionaires and billionaires". ;)
>>>>>How much extra tax will someone making $251K a year be paying?
>>>> Ever considered this? All people are equal.....
>>>> What a novel concept.
>>>Which is why the rich should be paying at least the same percentage of
>>>their discretionary income as the poor.
>>No,everyone should pay at the same rate.
> Forget it. You'll never convince leftists that everyone paying the same
> rate is fair. They define "fair" much differently than normal people.
Well, if life's necessities were scaled to match, then it would be fair.
If someone making ten times as much had to pay ten times as much for bread, for shelter, for education, for everything else, then it would be fair that he pay ten times as much for taxes.
But the over-entitled whiny rich American cunts can't even settle for the fact that someone making $30,000 a year with no discretionary income pays $4,000 in taxes whilst someone making $3 million a year with over two million in discretionary income pays $400,000.
But that's not enough for these greedy little cunts. They reason that they are paying one hundred times as much tax, and that's not right, just because they are making hundreds of times as much more. They want a HEAD TAX: EVERYONE pays the same amount, regardless of income.
They don't know their history at all, of course. But the cultivate people even dumber and more ignorant to go out and spread their message that taxing the rich more than the poor just isn't RIGHT! Boo hoo hoo!
>>>>>>>>> RD Sandman wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Phlip <phlip2...@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>> news:c53a0f23-9d7c-45fd-8086-
>>>>>>>>>> b77cd2e03...@sh1g2000pbc.googlegroups.com:
>>>>>>>>>>> So he's going for the guy who made his billions looting
>>>>>>>>>>> perfectly
>>>>>>>> good
>>>>>>>>>>> companies, and exporting their jobs to Red China...
>>>>>>>>>> Surely you exaggerate......Romney is only worth about $250
>>>>>>>>>> million.
>>>>>>>>> It's the same lib math by which folks earning $250,000 are called
>>>>>>>>> "millionaires" by Obama who need to "pay their fair share."
>>>>>>>> You forgot that both he and Biden refer to those folks as
>>>>>>>> "millionaires and billionaires". ;)
>>>>>>>How much extra tax will someone making $251K a year be paying?
>>>>>> Ever considered this? All people are equal.....
>>>>>> What a novel concept.
>>>>>Which is why the rich should be paying at least the same percentage of
>>>>>their discretionary income as the poor.
>>>>No,everyone should pay at the same rate.
>>>Forget it. You'll never convince leftists that everyone paying the same
>>>rate is fair. They define "fair" much differently than normal people.
>>>Even though we know that by paying the same rate, rich people pay more
>>>in taxes, that's not good enough for them.
>> That is exactly why I have issues with liberals - they do not believe in
>> the basic American tenets of freedom.
>The most basic tenet is that the American people serve themselves, and >not rich masters.
>>> On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 08:54:11 -0500, ozarkheart writhed in denials:
>...
>>>> That is exactly why I have issues with liberals - they do not
>>>> believe in the basic American tenets of freedom.
>>> The most basic tenet is that the American people serve themselves,
>>> and not rich masters.
>> "Serve themselves." WTF does that mean?
>It means that 'freedom' is not equivalent to 'economic serfdom'..
And exactly who do you believe is in a state of 'economic serfdom'?
On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 09:19:12 -0700, SkyEyes wrote:
> On Oct 28, 1:19 am, Gray Guest <No_email_for_...@wahoo.com> wrote:
>> SkyEyes <skyey...@cox.net> wrote in news:9d55757d-db91-4251-99a9-
>> 785d0b29b...@s9g2000pbh.googlegroups.com:
>> > On Oct 27, 6:38 pm, 3216 Dead <d...@dead.dog> wrote:
>> >> On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 01:02:35 +0000 (UTC), Gray Guest
>> >> >>>>>>> Hey you fat, stupid fuck. Are you counting the latest 4
>> Americans
>> >> >>>>>>> dead in your total?
>> >> >>>>>>Were you one of them? No?
>> >> >>>>>>Pity.
>> >> >>>>> Ah yes, liberal tolerance
>> >> >>>> You're still alive, aren't you?
>> >> >>>> Then stop whining that you don't get the tolerance you deserve.
>> >> >>>> Y
>> > ou
>> >> >>>> do.
>> >> >>> Any time you feel man enough chuckles...
>> >> >> Do I feel man enough to tolerate your existence?
>> >> >> Why, yes, I do...
>> >> >> But that doesn't mean I can't point out what an abjectly stupid
>> >> >> clown
>> > you
>> >> >> are.
>> >> >Actually fuckwit, I meant if you feel man enough that you don't
>> >> >want to tol;erate me anymoer you should take action.
>> >> Why would I do a silly thing like that, bubbles?
>> >> You're threatened because I refuse to threaten you?
>> >> That's an interesting reality you're living in there.
>> > Threats are the only things GG understands.
>> > Brenda Nelson, A.A.#34 and A+ atheist BAAWA Knight of the Golden
>> > Litterbox EAC Professor of Feline Thermometrics and Cat-Herding
>> > skyeyes nine at cox dot net OR skyeyes nine at yahoo dot com
>> Especially the threat to my life, liberty and pursuit of happiness that
>> you lefty dirtbags are pushing.
> No one is threatening your life, liberty or pursuit of happiness,
> cupcake. Unless, of course, you perceive it that *our* pursuit of those
> things threatens yours.
> Brenda Nelson, A.A.#34 and A+ atheist BAAWA Knight of the Golden
> Litterbox EAC Professor of Feline Thermometrics and Cat-Herding skyeyes
> nine at cox dot net OR skyeyes nine at yahoo dot com
I predict Gary Glitter here is headed for a bad end if he doesn't get his paranoia treated.
>>>>>>>> RD Sandman wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Phlip <phlip2...@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>>>>> news:c53a0f23-9d7c-45fd-8086-
>>>>>>>>> b77cd2e03...@sh1g2000pbc.googlegroups.com:
>>>>>>>>>> So he's going for the guy who made his billions looting
>>>>>>>>>> perfectly
>>>>>>> good
>>>>>>>>>> companies, and exporting their jobs to Red China...
>>>>>>>>> Surely you exaggerate......Romney is only worth about $250
>>>>>>>>> million.
>>>>>>>> It's the same lib math by which folks earning $250,000 are called
>>>>>>>> "millionaires" by Obama who need to "pay their fair share."
>>>>>>> You forgot that both he and Biden refer to those folks as
>>>>>>> "millionaires and billionaires". ;)
>>>>>>How much extra tax will someone making $251K a year be paying?
>>>>> Ever considered this? All people are equal.....
>>>>> What a novel concept.
>>>>Which is why the rich should be paying at least the same percentage of
>>>>their discretionary income as the poor.
>>>No,everyone should pay at the same rate.
>> Forget it. You'll never convince leftists that everyone paying the same
>> rate is fair. They define "fair" much differently than normal people.
>Well, if life's necessities were scaled to match, then it would be fair.
And that in itself is "unfair". Who determines what are necessities?
The whole intent of freedom is to avoid just that type of socialistic
crap.
How about treating everybody ***equally***? Why do you seem to have a
problem with that?
>If someone making ten times as much had to pay ten times as much for >bread, for shelter, for education, for everything else, then it would be >fair that he pay ten times as much for taxes.
No it would not.
>But the over-entitled whiny rich American cunts can't even settle for the >fact that someone making $30,000 a year with no discretionary income pays >$4,000 in taxes whilst someone making $3 million a year with over two >million in discretionary income pays $400,000.
And who decides what is "discretionary?
>But that's not enough for these greedy little cunts. They reason that >they are paying one hundred times as much tax, and that's not right, just >because they are making hundreds of times as much more. They want a HEAD >TAX: EVERYONE pays the same amount, regardless of income.
Wrong - and that is not what i said. Sad that you have to resort to
lies to try and make a statement.
>They don't know their history at all, of course. But the cultivate >people even dumber and more ignorant to go out and spread their message >that taxing the rich more than the poor just isn't RIGHT! Boo hoo hoo!
It isn't "right". It is the antithesis of freedom = aka socialism.
>>>>>>>>>> RD Sandman wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Phlip <phlip2...@gmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>> news:c53a0f23-9d7c-45fd-8086-
>>>>>>>>>>> b77cd2e03...@sh1g2000pbc.googlegroups.com:
>>>>>>>>>>>> So he's going for the guy who made his billions looting
>>>>>>>>>>>> perfectly
>>>>>>>>> good
>>>>>>>>>>>> companies, and exporting their jobs to Red China...
>>>>>>>>>>> Surely you exaggerate......Romney is only worth about $250
>>>>>>>>>>> million.
>>>>>>>>>> It's the same lib math by which folks earning $250,000 are
>>>>>>>>>> called "millionaires" by Obama who need to "pay their fair
>>>>>>>>>> share."
>>>>>>>>> You forgot that both he and Biden refer to those folks as
>>>>>>>>> "millionaires and billionaires". ;)
>>>>>>>>How much extra tax will someone making $251K a year be paying?
>>>>>>> Ever considered this? All people are equal.....
>>>>>>> What a novel concept.
>>>>>>Which is why the rich should be paying at least the same percentage
>>>>>>of their discretionary income as the poor.
>>>>>No,everyone should pay at the same rate.
>>>>Forget it. You'll never convince leftists that everyone paying the
>>>>same rate is fair. They define "fair" much differently than normal
>>>>people.
>>>>Even though we know that by paying the same rate, rich people pay more
>>>>in taxes, that's not good enough for them.
>>> That is exactly why I have issues with liberals - they do not believe
>>> in the basic American tenets of freedom.
>>The most basic tenet is that the American people serve themselves, and
>>not rich masters.
> "Serve themselves." WTF does that mean? How does that translate into
> robbing people?
It doesn't, bubbles. Quite the oppose, in fact. It means the people cannot be preyed upon by an overentitled aristocracy.
> Wanna try again in English this time?
It would be over your head no matter what language I used.
>>>> On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 08:54:11 -0500, ozarkheart writhed in denials:
>>...
>>>>> That is exactly why I have issues with liberals - they do not
>>>>> believe in the basic American tenets of freedom.
>>>> The most basic tenet is that the American people serve themselves,
>>>> and not rich masters.
>>> "Serve themselves." WTF does that mean?
>>It means that 'freedom' is not equivalent to 'economic serfdom'..
> And exactly who do you believe is in a state of 'economic serfdom'?
Oh, how about one where the working and impoverished classes have the tax burden to subsidize a government devoted to serving the rich?
> On Oct 28, 1:17 am, Gray Guest <No_email_for_...@wahoo.com> wrote:
>> SkyEyes <skyey...@cox.net> wrote in news:17cae6ad-1884-4ff5-899d-
>> bd2a50f00...@mq1g2000pbb.googlegroups.com:
>> > On Oct 27, 8:14 am, Gray Guest <No_email_for_...@wahoo.com> wrote:
>> >> SkyEyes <skyey...@cox.net> wrote in news:095a05d7-f3e4-4bb8-bd38-
>> >> 911c7c207...@m5g2000pbv.googlegroups.com:
>> >> >> > On Oct 26, 4:55 pm, Phlip <phlip2...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >> On Oct 26, 1:40 pm, "Syd M." <pauldavidwri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >> > On Oct 26, 4:38 pm, Kurt Nicklas <kurtnick...@gmail.com> wrote
>:
>> >> >> >> > > I won't be voting against Barrack Hussein Obama because I'm
>> whi
>> > te
>> >> >> >> > > and he's black.
>> >> >> >> > > I'm voting against him because he's incompetent.
>> >> >> >> > So, why did you continue to vote FOR your hero, GW Bush?
>> >> >> >> > He was FAR more incompetent then Obama.
>> >> >> >> Maybe he thinks Obama is a Socialist.
>> >> >> >> So he's going for the guy who made his billions looting perfectl
> y
>> >> >> >> good companies, and exporting their jobs to Red China...
>> >> >> > Nobody said these rightards werre intelligent...
>> >> >> ROFLMAO!!! How much did you make in a year? How much are you wor
>> > th?
>> >> > Stop conflating riches with virtue. Riches tend, in this context, to
>> >> > be an indication of *lack of* virtue.
>> >> > Brenda Nelson, A.A.#34 and A+ atheist
>> >> > BAAWA Knight of the Golden Litterbox
>> >> > EAC Professor of Feline Thermometrics and Cat-Herding
>> >> > skyeyes nine at cox dot net OR
>> >> > skyeyes nine at yahoo dot com
>> >> And you keep conflating wealth with evil and poverty with good.
>> > I can't help myself, I was brought up to be a fundamentalist
>> > christian. It's what I was taught. "It is easier for a camel to g
> o
>> > through the eye of a needle than it is for a rich man to get into
>> > heaven." "Lay not up for yourselves treasures on Earth, where moth
>> > and rust doth corrupt, and thieves break in and steal; but lay up for
>> > yourselves treasures in Heaven." Etc., etc., etc. While I no longer
>> > believe in the superstition, I still very much believe in the moral
>> > stance.
>> > Brenda Nelson, A.A.#34 and A+ atheist
>> > BAAWA Knight of the Golden Litterbox
>> > EAC Professor of Feline Thermometrics and Cat-Herding
>> > skyeyes nine at cox dot net OR
>> > skyeyes nine at yahoo dot com
>> Awwww. And I thought you couldn't impose your morality on another.
>> It seems you can.
> Hard not to do, isn't it? Nevertheless, one is obliged to make the
> effort.
> Brenda Nelson, A.A.#34 and A+ atheist
> BAAWA Knight of the Golden Litterbox
> EAC Professor of Feline Thermometrics and Cat-Herding
> skyeyes nine at cox dot net OR
> skyeyes nine at yahoo dot com
Really? Becuase I have been hearing for decades from your side that you can't. I guess unless it's YOUR morality.
Well, now that we have that out of the way... abortion is a moral choice, doncha think? Making people, pay for abortions who are morally opposed to it, violating thier morality?
Oops, you've opened a can of worms.
-- Refusenik #1
Libs suffer from Eleutherophobia. And there is no cure.
> On Oct 28, 1:19 am, Gray Guest <No_email_for_...@wahoo.com> wrote:
>> SkyEyes <skyey...@cox.net> wrote in news:9d55757d-db91-4251-99a9-
>> 785d0b29b...@s9g2000pbh.googlegroups.com:
>> > On Oct 27, 6:38 pm, 3216 Dead <d...@dead.dog> wrote:
>> >> On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 01:02:35 +0000 (UTC), Gray Guest
>> >> >>>>>>> Hey you fat, stupid fuck. Are you counting the latest 4
>> Americans
>> >> >>>>>>> dead in your total?
>> >> >>>>>>Were you one of them? No?
>> >> >>>>>>Pity.
>> >> >>>>> Ah yes, liberal tolerance
>> >> >>>> You're still alive, aren't you?
>> >> >>>> Then stop whining that you don't get the tolerance you deserve. Y
>> > ou
>> >> >>>> do.
>> >> >>> Any time you feel man enough chuckles...
>> >> >> Do I feel man enough to tolerate your existence?
>> >> >> Why, yes, I do...
>> >> >> But that doesn't mean I can't point out what an abjectly stupid clo
> wn
>> > you
>> >> >> are.
>> >> >Actually fuckwit, I meant if you feel man enough that you don't want > to
>> >> >tol;erate me anymoer you should take action.
>> >> Why would I do a silly thing like that, bubbles?
>> >> You're threatened because I refuse to threaten you?
>> >> That's an interesting reality you're living in there.
>> > Threats are the only things GG understands.
>> > Brenda Nelson, A.A.#34 and A+ atheist
>> > BAAWA Knight of the Golden Litterbox
>> > EAC Professor of Feline Thermometrics and Cat-Herding
>> > skyeyes nine at cox dot net OR
>> > skyeyes nine at yahoo dot com
>> Especially the threat to my life, liberty and pursuit of happiness that y
> ou
>> lefty dirtbags are pushing.
> No one is threatening your life, liberty or pursuit of happiness,
> cupcake. Unless, of course, you perceive it that *our* pursuit of
> those things threatens yours.
That is your opinion. My reading of history says that people with your point of view always end up killing people with my point of view.
Not this time.
> Brenda Nelson, A.A.#34 and A+ atheist
> BAAWA Knight of the Golden Litterbox
> EAC Professor of Feline Thermometrics and Cat-Herding
> skyeyes nine at cox dot net OR
> skyeyes nine at yahoo dot com
-- Refusenik #1
Libs suffer from Eleutherophobia. And there is no cure.
