Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

American Music Awards become 'modern Sodom'

0 views
Skip to first unread message

J

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 12:38:17 AM11/24/09
to
Two questions:

1) After knowing what transpired during this show, does anyone have any
doubts about why normal people don't want these people adopting innocent
children?

2) Is there any sane reason *not* to favor a more powerful FCC?

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=116899

American Music Awards become 'modern Sodom'


Openly 'gay' Adam Lambert simulates sex acts with men on ABC broadcast


Openly homosexual former "American Idol" performer Adam Lambert shocked the
American Music Awards audience last night by shoving dance team members'

faces into his crotch, leading others around on dog leashes and delivering a
passionate on-stage kiss to his male keyboard player during the ABC
broadcast.

The performance of his new song, "For Your Entertainment," marks his first
public appearance since his "American Idol" competition loss to Christian
Kris Allen.

According to the London Telegraph, Lambert was unapologetic to anyone who
might have been offended, saying, "Maybe I'm not your cup of tea."

Lyrics of the song included: "Hold on until it's over. Can you handle what
I'm about to do. It's about to get rough with you."


--
J Young
Jvis...@live.com

Ray Fischer

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 12:42:37 AM11/24/09
to
J <Jvis...@live.com> wrote:
>Two questions:

Yes, you are a nazi turd, and no, nobody likes you.

--
Ray Fischer
rfis...@sonic.net

The Chief Instigator

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 12:50:56 AM11/24/09
to
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:38:17 -0500, J <Jvis...@live.com> wrote:
> Two questions:
>
> 1) After knowing what transpired during this show, does anyone have any
> doubts about why normal people don't want these people adopting innocent
> children?

Why should you worry, Junkie? You will -never- be a normal person,

> 2) Is there any sane reason *not* to favor a more powerful FCC?

Yes: the First Amendment, Junkie Ul'yanov. Have someone literate try and
explain it to your shredded mentality.

> http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=116899

World Nut Daily? What a non-surprise.

--
Patrick L. "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (pat...@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.io.com/~patrick/aeros.php (TCI's 2008-09 Houston Aeros) AA#2273
LAST GAME: Milwaukee 2, Houston 1 (OT, November 22)
NEXT GAME: Wednesday, November 25 at Hamilton, 6:05

Science Stunted Bonsai Brain

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 1:21:55 AM11/24/09
to
On Nov 24, 12:38 am, "J" <Jvisi...@live.com> wrote:
> Two questions:
>
> 1) After knowing what transpired during this show, does anyone have any
> doubts about why normal people don't want these people adopting innocent
> children?

I hate to break it to you, but gay people ALREADY are permitted to
adopt children WITHOUT being married in most states other than Florida
and Arkansas. (ref. http://gaylife.about.com/od/gayparentingadoption/a/gaycoupleadopt.htm)

Defeating gay marriage is a case of closing the proverbial barn door
long after the horse left, if you're concerned about adoption.

W.T.S.

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 2:07:56 AM11/24/09
to
"J" <Jvis...@live.com> wrote in message
news:3ach18....@news.alt.net...

> Two questions: 1) After knowing what transpired during this show, does
> anyone have any doubts about why normal people don't want these people
> adopting innocent children?
> 2) Is there any sane reason *not* to favor a more powerful FCC?
> http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=116899
1) Because it's better to let "these people" adopt them than any couple
stupid enough to attend church!
2) Because the FCC doesn't have the backbone to censor religious
broadcasting, and I like strong, sexually orientated programing and the FCC
has no business messing with sexuality on the public airwaves!
Bible, sick and degenerate.


Lefty

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 3:19:38 AM11/24/09
to
On Nov 24, 12:38 am, "J" <Jvisi...@live.com> wrote:

<snip boring bullshit>

Mark

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 3:24:14 AM11/24/09
to
On Nov 24, 1:21 am, Science Stunted Bonsai Brain <dearci...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Nov 24, 12:38 am, "J" <Jvisi...@live.com> wrote:
>
> > Two questions:
>
> > 1) After knowing what transpired during this show, does anyone have any
> > doubts about why normal people don't want these people adopting innocent
> > children?
>
> I hate to break it to you, but gay people ALREADY are permitted to
> adopt children WITHOUT being married in most states other than Florida
> and Arkansas. (ref.http://gaylife.about.com/od/gayparentingadoption/a/gaycoupleadopt.htm)

>
> Defeating gay marriage is a case of closing the proverbial barn door
> long after the horse left, if you're concerned about adoption.

I think if you look closely you'll find that
most people don't know what they're talking
about most of the time. For this reason it is
prudent to be selective when deciding how
to spend your contemplative moments.

---
Mark

Mark Edwards

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 6:33:22 AM11/24/09
to
No cluons were harmed when Mark wrote:
>I think if you look closely you'll find that most people don't know what
>they're talking about most of the time.

I don't know what you're talking about...


Mark Edwards
--
Proof of Sanity Forged Upon Request

Boo Radley

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 6:33:31 AM11/24/09
to

Yeah you should only listen to good Christian groups like Prussian Blue

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uKJA0kSPAYI&feature=related

Robibnikoff

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 7:18:06 AM11/24/09
to

"Mark Edwards" <Mark-E...@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:WbednVruTY4fWZbW...@supernews.com...

> No cluons were harmed when Mark wrote:
>>I think if you look closely you'll find that most people don't know what
>>they're talking about most of the time.
>
> I don't know what you're talking about...

Did somebody say something?
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo & Belly Dancer Supreme
BAAWA Knight
#1557


Mitchell Holman

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 8:46:58 AM11/24/09
to
"J" <Jvis...@live.com> wrote in news:3ach18....@news.alt.net:

> Two questions:
>
>
>
> 1) After knowing what transpired during this show, does anyone have
> any doubts about why normal people don't want these people adopting
> innocent children?
>


If you are talking about Pedophile Priests then
you have a point.

>
>
> 2) Is there any sane reason *not* to favor a more powerful FCC?
>


Because you guys always whine about "Big Government"?

>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=116899
>
>
>
>
>
> American Music Awards become 'modern Sodom'
>
>
>
>
> Openly 'gay' Adam Lambert simulates sex acts with men on ABC broadcast
>


"Openly gay."

As opposed to "openly straight"?


Otto Bahn

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 10:25:32 AM11/24/09
to
"Robibnikoff" <witc...@broomstick.com> wrote

>>>I think if you look closely you'll find that most people don't know what
>>>they're talking about most of the time.
>>
>> I don't know what you're talking about...
>
> Did somebody say something?

It's a clear dichotomy -- they either said something,
or they said nothing. What's inside an empty egg?

--oTTo--

Quit Learing at me


Mark

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 11:08:46 AM11/24/09
to
On Nov 24, 10:25 am, "Otto Bahn" <e...@eio.com> wrote:

> Quit Learing at me

Timothy Leary's dead.

---
Mark

Spartakus

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 11:25:57 AM11/24/09
to
"J" <Jvisi...@live.com> wrote:

> Two questions:
>
> 1) After knowing what transpired during this show, does anyone have any
> doubts about why normal people don't want these people adopting innocent
> children?
>
> 2) Is there any sane reason *not* to favor a more powerful FCC?
>
> http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=116899
>
> American Music Awards become 'modern Sodom'

"Creed's Scott Stapp and Kid Rock may have been caught
on camera receiving blow jobs from groupies on a tour bus
in 1999, but the Christian rocker insists they did not have
sex with those women."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/23/creed-frontman-scott-stap_n_367836.html

anonymous

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 1:39:20 PM11/24/09
to
J wrote:
>
> Two questions:
>
> 1) After knowing what transpired during this show, does anyone have any
> doubts about why normal people don't want these people adopting innocent
> children?

Adopting innocent children is a powerful phrase. I like it. You see, I
am adopted and
what I see and have seen, like the catholic family where the father
sexually assaulted his daughter and at least two of his three sons.
That is just one example.

And what about the millions of questionable 25 year old men who chase
young girls of 15 giving them booze and possible drugs and having them
come over after school for fun and games. Happens in ever small town
and city on the planet. Do you think that fathers of the 15 year old
girls likes the idea of what they do to his daughter. These are usually
guys who have quit school, lack a little education, have time on thier
hands and sex on their brain 24/7.

Janet Jackson show her tits? Want your kids to see that on family tv?
If you take your kids to any park there are all sort of men and women of
all ages
in tight, loose and scantily dressed rubbing, garbbing feeling, touching
the entire torso. Homosexual in Canada at least have equal rights.
Kiss in public or on tv, in parks and airports happens all the time.
Even sports heroes kiss each other and grab each other and hug each
other on the field while being paid millions of dollars. Often the
whole family is watch in the stands or in their livingroom.

>
> 2) Is there any sane reason *not* to favor a more powerful FCC?
>

I am all for it. You see, if you are 6 or 7 years old you can google
the phrase "free porn videos" and you will get hundreds or probably
thousands of web sites where heterosexual men shove with force their
penis into women's mouths, vaginas and anus - often two or thee guys are
used to fill each cavity. They slab the woman around and treat her like
dirt. Then they all squirt all over the woman's face. Even if it is
acting, is this the sort of material that you want your heterosexual
daughters to watch and perhaps realize that some of those antics will be
expected of them as a sexually active woman before or after marriage?
Is that the sort of thing you want your son to see, how the women are
treated, his wife, girlfriend?

Why isn't every Christian and non-Christian screaming at the top of
their lungs about the porn to the fcc and have the porn stopped by the
end of this year, 60 days. And remember this is free porn, no age
restriction, no nothing restriction. Oh, and you appreciate this is
available 24 hours a day. I appreciate you may have a child protection
device on your home computers but chance are lots of your children's
buddies have not.

> http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=116899
>
> American Music Awards become 'modern Sodom'
>
> Openly 'gay' Adam Lambert simulates sex acts with men on ABC broadcast
>
> Openly homosexual former "American Idol" performer Adam Lambert shocked the
> American Music Awards audience last night by shoving dance team members'
>

Elvis wiggled his legs in a corse way and got away with it. The men
shove women's faces in their crotches with and without clothes on all
free 24/7. Well, there are two kids of spouses, those that do whatever
the wife says and those that do whatever the husband says - true there
is usually no leashes. I would hope that anyone who gives anyone a kiss
would be passionate about it be they homosexual or heterosexual.


> faces into his crotch, leading others around on dog leashes and delivering a
> passionate on-stage kiss to his male keyboard player during the ABC
> broadcast.
>
> The performance of his new song, "For Your Entertainment," marks his first
> public appearance since his "American Idol" competition loss to Christian
> Kris Allen.
>
> According to the London Telegraph, Lambert was unapologetic to anyone who
> might have been offended, saying, "Maybe I'm not your cup of tea."

Listen, if you hear people on cell phones they are apologying all the
time.

>
> Lyrics of the song included: "Hold on until it's over. Can you handle what
> I'm about to do. It's about to get rough with you."

Sounds like the guy has watched some of the heterosexual porn. Remember
he is openly homosexual and homosexuality isn't a crime in the USA or
Canada. It is very legal.

The reason he probably didn't apologize is that nobody was affended.

I don't think it is for you to say that anyone was shocked. You can
only speak for yourself.

JohnN

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 2:16:31 PM11/24/09
to
Could have been iBen, your god didn't destroy the theatre where it was
performed.

Please come back to us when your god either decides to make itself
known or you give up.

JohnN

elizabeth

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 2:26:18 PM11/24/09
to
On Nov 24, 12:19 am, Lefty <leftydr...@netscape.net> wrote:
> On Nov 24, 12:38 am, "J" <Jvisi...@live.com> wrote:
>
> <snip boring bullshit>

I don't watch TV anymore.

Syd M.

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 2:36:24 PM11/24/09
to
On Nov 24, 12:38 am, "J" <Jvisi...@live.com> wrote:
> Two questions:
>

I got just one, Junkie Young;
Why don't you stay out of other people's business?

PDW

Chris McGonnell

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 3:52:58 PM11/24/09
to

No, no, no, no: he's outside, looking in.

Chris McG.
Harming humanity since 1951
"Hell, -I- saw it coming. And I'm a moron." - Lots42

Doctroid

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 4:14:31 PM11/24/09
to
In article <3ach18....@news.alt.net>, "J" <Jvis...@live.com>
wrote:

> 1) After knowing what transpired during this show, does anyone have any
> doubts about why normal people don't want these people adopting innocent
> children?

I don't know any normal people.

I don't know any these people either.

I definitely don't know any innocent children.

> 2) Is there any sane reason *not* to favor a more powerful FCC?

Yep. It's called an "on/off switch".

Then again, I don't know any sane people.

--
Sig available on request.

- Doctroid

pete

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 8:32:58 PM11/24/09
to
Science Stunted Bonsai Brain wrote:
> On Nov 24, 12:38 am, "J" <Jvisi...@live.com> wrote:
>>Two questions:
>>1) After knowing what transpired during this show, does anyone have any
>>doubts about why normal people don't want these people adopting innocent
>>children?
> I hate to break it to you, but gay people ALREADY are permitted to

I didn't see the show.

From the subject line,
my first guess was that "these people"
meant Hollywood celebrities in general.

--
pete

furlan

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 10:30:21 PM11/24/09
to
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:52:58 -0500, Chris McGonnell wrote:

> On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 08:08:46 -0800 (PST), Mark <blueri...@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
>>On Nov 24, 10:25 am, "Otto Bahn" <e...@eio.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Quit Learing at me
>>
>>Timothy Leary's dead.
>>
>>
> No, no, no, no: he's outside, looking in.

How Moody, heh...

ciao,
f

--
aa #2301
"...The word that separates that which is dead from that which is
living....In the beginning was the word and that word was...CHOICE"
-- Tom Robbins (SLWW)

Piet de Arcilla

unread,
Nov 25, 2009, 1:08:49 AM11/25/09
to
On Nov 24, 6:33 am, Mark Edwards <Mark-Edwa...@comcast.net> wrote:
> No cluons were harmed when Mark wrote:
>
> >I think if you look closely you'll find that most people don't know what
> >they're talking about most of the time.
>
> I don't know what you're talking about...

If you know you don't know what you're talking about, then you do know
what you're talking about, in a way.

Mark

unread,
Nov 25, 2009, 5:31:23 AM11/25/09
to

Unicorn math

---
Mark

Nicko

unread,
Nov 25, 2009, 6:42:31 PM11/25/09
to

I'll see you one Unicorn Math and raise you one Pretzel Logic.

--
YOP...

Don Martin

unread,
Nov 28, 2009, 8:50:27 AM11/28/09
to

J is not concerned about anything. He just hates people not like himself (and
that is a pretty wide net).

-

aa #2278 Never mind "proof." Where is your evidence?
Fidei defensor (Hon. Antipodean)
The Squeeky Wheel: http://home.comcast.net/~drdonmartin/

0 new messages