harry k <
turnk...@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:e45f7784-591f-4a17...@e9g2000pbh.googlegroups.com:
snip
>> The point I made is that there is and was enough water to cover the
>> Earth
> and always has been.God did not rely on standing water to cover the
> Earth-He made it rain.
> Rain comes from existing water. Where did the water come from for
> enough rain to cover the highes hillss?
Out of those windows in the firmament, or a really weak bladder shared by
the heavenly host
> Where did it go afterwards?
Just how vivid is your imagination?
Back through those windows in the firmament, or do you really want to
know. Hot lemonade anyone?
walkslaone who has to smile at the ignorance of fundies when it comes to
science.
Waters from the deep, where are the new oceans from the crust caving in.
& water run downhill, so how fast was it being pumped out to prevent it
from becoming a negative flow.
From somewhen & where on the web.
MINI-FAQ: Psalms 14:1
"The fool has said in his heart, 'There is no God.' They are corrupt,
they have done abominable works, there is none that does good." (Psalms
14:1)
ad hominem fallacy: An argument is discounted based on attacking the
character of the person making the argument. ("He is wrong when he says
there is no God, because he is a fool.")
strawman fallacy: Arguing against a position by creating a different,
weaker, or irrelevant position and refuting that position instead of the
original. ("There is no God" misrepresents "There isn't sufficient
evidence that God exists.")
circular reasoning: The truth of the conclusion is assumed in order to
justify the premises. ("The fool says there is no God, because anyone who
says there is no God is a fool.")
begging the question: The argument creates a secondary proposition that
is related to the primary proposition, which requires a similar argument
that is missing. (The existence of God is assumed, while addressing
propositions of whether God exists.)
fallacy of inconsistency: The argument is inconsistent with other
arguments within the same context.
In the Christian context, Jesus commands against the invective in Psalms
14:1, warning that "whoever says 'You fool!' shall be liable to the hell
of fire" in Matthew 5:22.
special pleading: The inappropriate attribution of emotive functions to
objects that do not have that capability. (Hearts are not capable of
"knowing" or of feeling emotions.)
redundancy: Psalm 53 is identical to Psalm 14.
questionable premise: It is obviously not the case that all atheists do
nothing but bad deeds. This premise is invalidated by a single example of
an atheist doing a single charitable act.