italian priest: women invite violence

limpwrist

unread,

Jan 4, 2013, 7:29:35 AM1/4/13

to

i wonder what this pervert's reasoning for priests molesting kids is. <G>

http://www.goddiscussion.com/105810/women-stage-protest-at-italian-catholic-church-over-remarks-by-priest/

--

kevin lindquist +85595948445
p.o. box 1046, phnom penh 12000, kh
mobinfla.blogspot.com

duke

unread,

Jan 4, 2013, 7:43:33 AM1/4/13

to

On Fri, 04 Jan 2013 06:29:35 -0600, limpwrist <an01...@nym.hush.com> wrote:

>i wonder what this pervert's reasoning for priests molesting kids is. <G>

Hmmm, a queer picking on a molester.

The dukester, American - American
********************************************
You can't fix stupid.
********************************************

Tim

unread,

Jan 4, 2013, 8:31:21 AM1/4/13

to

"duke" <duckg...@cox.net> wrote in message
news:vijde89v2r2mgp1qj...@4ax.com...

> On Fri, 04 Jan 2013 06:29:35 -0600, limpwrist <an01...@nym.hush.com>
> wrote:
>
>>i wonder what this pervert's reasoning for priests molesting kids is. <G>
>
> Hmmm, a queer picking on a molester.
>

Diddlers are legion, still, and you're defending them, still. And by the
sounds of it your licking your lips, your fat gluttonous piggy lips.

hypatiab7

unread,

Jan 4, 2013, 8:46:11 AM1/4/13

to

On Friday, January 4, 2013 7:43:33 AM UTC-5, duke wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Jan 2013 06:29:35 -0600, limpwrist <an01...@nym.hush.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> >i wonder what this pervert's reasoning for priests molesting kids is. <G>
>
>
>
> Hmmm, a queer picking on a molester.
>

Talkin about yourself, Duke?

Ramon F. Herrera

unread,

Jan 4, 2013, 8:49:07 AM1/4/13

to

"italian priest: women invite violence "

Republican, no doubt.

http://patriot.net/~ramon/misc/Speaking-of-Whores.jpg
http://patriot.net/~ramon/misc/GOP-Hates-Women-and-Feeling-is-Mutual.jpg

-Ramon

default

unread,

Jan 4, 2013, 8:52:24 AM1/4/13

to

On Fri, 04 Jan 2013 06:29:35 -0600, limpwrist <an01...@nym.hush.com>
wrote:

>i wonder what this pervert's reasoning for priests molesting kids is. <G>
>
>http://www.goddiscussion.com/105810/women-stage-protest-at-italian-catholic-church-over-remarks-by-priest/

There's very little difference between Muslims and Catholics....

thomas p.

unread,

Jan 4, 2013, 10:17:25 AM1/4/13

to

"default" skrev i meddelelsen
news:uende89olnsbvcmj5...@4ax.com...

Well the Catholics have better parties.

--
thomas p

Ignorance is the mother of devotion.

David Hume

Ramon F. Herrera

unread,

Jan 4, 2013, 10:35:35 AM1/4/13

to

On Jan 4, 7:52 am, default wrote:

> There's very little difference between Muslims and Catholics....

Beg to differ:

http://patriot.net/~ramon/misc/Hot-Chimichanga.jpg

-Ramon

------------------
"Conservatives love America, nobody doubts that - They just hate about
half the people in it"

-Bill Maher

•RLMeasures

unread,

Jan 4, 2013, 11:35:23 AM1/4/13

to

In article
<301074437378995286.7320...@news.supernews.com>,

limpwrist <an01...@nym.hush.com> wrote:

> i wonder what this pervert's reasoning for priests molesting kids is. <G>

АА In Boston Fr. Paul Shanely claimed that a cute boy seduced him.
>
>
http://www.goddiscussion.com/105810/women-stage-protest-at-italian-catholic-church-over-remarks-by-priest/

Mike Painter

unread,

Jan 4, 2013, 11:54:03 AM1/4/13

to

On Fri, 04 Jan 2013 06:29:35 -0600, limpwrist <an01...@nym.hush.com>
wrote:

>i wonder what this pervert's reasoning for priests molesting kids is. <G>
>
>http://www.goddiscussion.com/105810/women-stage-protest-at-italian-catholic-church-over-remarks-by-priest/

There is a short film shown in many rape crisis training course that
show the stupidity of this.

A man has been robbed and the defense attorney claims it is his fault
because of the way he dresses and his expensive watch.

Fred^2013.01

unread,

Jan 4, 2013, 5:51:57 PM1/4/13

to

limpwrist <an01...@nym.hush.com> wrote:
>i wonder what this pervert's reasoning for priests molesting kids is. <G>

They ask to be raped by being so damn cute!

>http://www.goddiscussion.com/105810/women-stage-protest-at-italian-catholic-church-over-remarks-by-priest/

Fred^2013.01

unread,

Jan 4, 2013, 5:52:14 PM1/4/13

to

"Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote:

>"italian priest: women invite violence "
>Republican, no doubt.

Obviously.

duke

unread,

Jan 5, 2013, 1:14:33 PM1/5/13

to

On Fri, 4 Jan 2013 05:49:07 -0800 (PST), "Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net>
wrote:

>

>"italian priest: women invite violence "
>
>Republican, no doubt.

The more you show, you more you invite.

Jeanne Douglas

unread,

Jan 5, 2013, 10:23:40 PM1/5/13

to

In article <pbrge819t80pmooul...@4ax.com>,

duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:

> On Fri, 4 Jan 2013 05:49:07 -0800 (PST), "Ramon F. Herrera"
> <ra...@conexus.net>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >"italian priest: women invite violence "
> >
> >Republican, no doubt.
>
> The more you show, you more you invite.

And dukie once again says rape can be justified.

When do you start demanding that women wear burkhas to avoid "inviting
violence" from men?

--
JD

"Osama Bin Laden is dead and GM is alive."--VP Joseph Biden

BroilJAB

unread,

Jan 6, 2013, 7:28:54 AM1/6/13

to

Congress is refusing to certify this Election.
Irate Obama has declared Race War on whites.

"We must send all whites straight to Hell!"
--Obama's Inauguration Preacher

Use 2nd Amendment, go out and buy a gun.

duke

unread,

Jan 6, 2013, 9:46:50 AM1/6/13

to

On Sat, 05 Jan 2013 19:23:40 -0800, Jeanne Douglas <hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com>
wrote:

>In article <pbrge819t80pmooul...@4ax.com>,
> duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 4 Jan 2013 05:49:07 -0800 (PST), "Ramon F. Herrera"
>> <ra...@conexus.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >"italian priest: women invite violence "
>> >
>> >Republican, no doubt.
>>
>> The more you show, you more you invite.
>
>And dukie once again says rape can be justified.

Stupid, stupid jdyke.

>When do you start demanding that women wear burkhas to avoid "inviting
>violence" from men?

Devils Advocaat

unread,

Jan 6, 2013, 9:52:54 AM1/6/13

to

On 5 Jan, 18:14, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Jan 2013 05:49:07 -0800 (PST), "Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> >"italian priest: women invite violence "
>
> >Republican, no doubt.
>
> The more you show, you more you invite.

So it's the woman's fault if you can't control yourself is it?

duke

unread,

Jan 7, 2013, 8:05:28 AM1/7/13

to

On Sun, 6 Jan 2013 06:52:54 -0800 (PST), Devils Advocaat <manky...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>On 5 Jan, 18:14, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>> On Fri, 4 Jan 2013 05:49:07 -0800 (PST), "Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> >"italian priest: women invite violence "
>>
>> >Republican, no doubt.
>>
>> The more you show, you more you invite.
>
>So it's the woman's fault if you can't control yourself is it?

Are you a queer?

Jeanne Douglas

unread,

Jan 7, 2013, 7:11:23 PM1/7/13

to

In article <70ile8hmpjhhjkncr...@4ax.com>,

duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:

> On Sun, 6 Jan 2013 06:52:54 -0800 (PST), Devils Advocaat
> <manky...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >On 5 Jan, 18:14, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> >> On Fri, 4 Jan 2013 05:49:07 -0800 (PST), "Ramon F. Herrera"
> >> <ra...@conexus.net>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> >"italian priest: women invite violence "
> >>
> >> >Republican, no doubt.
> >>
> >> The more you show, you more you invite.
> >
> >So it's the woman's fault if you can't control yourself is it?
>
> Are you a queer?

Why did you ask this question? What does it have to do with the subject
at hand or the question you were asked?

Why don't you try again and actually answer the question DA asked you:

"So it's the woman's fault if you can't control yourself is it?"

This is a vital question that every man needs to answer, it's part of
the way society is changing for the better, it's part of the journey of
women as property to women as master's of their own domain. But part of
that is men realizing that it's no longer acceptable to claim that it's
a woman's fault if she's raped; she should be able to walk down the
street naked without any man attacking her. Any other attitude about
women leads to societies where women are hidden away in purdah, as in
Muslim societies and in India.

So now that I've started an important discussion on this subject, please
answer DA's question.

Devils Advocaat

unread,

Jan 8, 2013, 12:52:01 AM1/8/13

to

On 7 Jan, 13:05, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Jan 2013 06:52:54 -0800 (PST), Devils Advocaat <mankygo...@gmail.com>

> wrote:
>
> >On 5 Jan, 18:14, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> >> On Fri, 4 Jan 2013 05:49:07 -0800 (PST), "Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net>
> >> wrote:
>
> >> >"italian priest: women invite violence "
>
> >> >Republican, no doubt.
>
> >> The more you show, you more you invite.
>
> >So it's the woman's fault if you can't control yourself is it?
>
> Are you a queer?

Poor little duke, thinks a man who can control himself and his urges
must be queer.

Sorry to disappoint you duke but I'm not that way inclined.

I have desires, but I control them, they don't control me.

Now how about you answer the question I posted.

Devils Advocaat

unread,

Jan 8, 2013, 12:55:14 AM1/8/13

to

On 8 Jan, 00:11, Jeanne Douglas <hlwdj...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
> In article <70ile8hmpjhhjkncrv0jaqh1tr63f57...@4ax.com>,

>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> > On Sun, 6 Jan 2013 06:52:54 -0800 (PST), Devils Advocaat

> > <mankygo...@gmail.com>

> > wrote:
>
> > >On 5 Jan, 18:14, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> > >> On Fri, 4 Jan 2013 05:49:07 -0800 (PST), "Ramon F. Herrera"
> > >> <ra...@conexus.net>
> > >> wrote:
>
> > >> >"italian priest: women invite violence "
>
> > >> >Republican, no doubt.
>
> > >> The more you show, you more you invite.
>
> > >So it's the woman's fault if you can't control yourself is it?
>
> > Are you a queer?
>
> Why did you ask this question? What does it have to do with the subject
> at hand or the question you were asked?
>
> Why don't you try again and actually answer the question DA asked you:
>
> "So it's the woman's fault if you can't control yourself is it?"
>
> This is a vital question that every man needs to answer, it's part of
> the way society is changing for the better, it's part of the journey of
> women as property to women as master's of their own domain. But part of
> that is men realizing that it's no longer acceptable to claim that it's
> a woman's fault if she's raped; she should be able to walk down the
> street naked without any man attacking her. Any other attitude about
> women leads to societies where women are hidden away in purdah, as in
> Muslim societies and in India.
>
> So now that I've started an important discussion on this subject, please
> answer DA's question.

Thanks for your support Jeanne.

I love looking at women no matter how they are dressed.

But I'm not slave to my desires.

Jeanne Douglas

unread,

Jan 8, 2013, 1:26:28 AM1/8/13

to

In article
<597f661c-3daa-4344...@eo2g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>,

Devils Advocaat <manky...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 7 Jan, 13:05, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> > On Sun, 6 Jan 2013 06:52:54 -0800 (PST), Devils Advocaat
> > <mankygo...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >On 5 Jan, 18:14, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> > >> On Fri, 4 Jan 2013 05:49:07 -0800 (PST), "Ramon F. Herrera"
> > >> <ra...@conexus.net>
> > >> wrote:
> >
> > >> >"italian priest: women invite violence "
> >
> > >> >Republican, no doubt.
> >
> > >> The more you show, you more you invite.
> >
> > >So it's the woman's fault if you can't control yourself is it?
> >
> > Are you a queer?
>
> Poor little duke, thinks a man who can control himself and his urges
> must be queer.
>
> Sorry to disappoint you duke but I'm not that way inclined.
>
> I have desires, but I control them, they don't control me.
>
> Now how about you answer the question I posted.

Anybody else notice that the very same people who claim that women can't
hold important jobs because we're slaves to our hormones are exactly the
same people who blame women for being raped for dressing so
provocatively that men can't control themselves?

Jeanne Douglas

unread,

Jan 8, 2013, 1:29:27 AM1/8/13

to

In article
<7bbf7687-ce73-48a2...@hf3g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>,

You're welcome. But it's as much support for a more civilized society as
support for you.

> I love looking at women no matter how they are dressed.

And I love looking men. The only time I might have lost control was at
the Page/Plant my best friend and I attended. Both of us were ready to
jump down onto the stage and do Plant right there!

> But I'm not slave to my desires.

Exactly.

duke

unread,

Jan 8, 2013, 8:29:43 AM1/8/13

to

On Mon, 07 Jan 2013 16:11:23 -0800, Jeanne Douglas <hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com>
wrote:

>In article <70ile8hmpjhhjkncr...@4ax.com>,
> duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 6 Jan 2013 06:52:54 -0800 (PST), Devils Advocaat
>> <manky...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >On 5 Jan, 18:14, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>> >> On Fri, 4 Jan 2013 05:49:07 -0800 (PST), "Ramon F. Herrera"
>> >> <ra...@conexus.net>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> >"italian priest: women invite violence "
>> >>
>> >> >Republican, no doubt.
>> >>
>> >> The more you show, you more you invite.
>> >
>> >So it's the woman's fault if you can't control yourself is it?
>>
>> Are you a queer?
>
>Why did you ask this question? What does it have to do with the subject
>at hand or the question you were asked?

Some of us have more going for us than you do.

>Why don't you try again and actually answer the question DA asked you:
>
>"So it's the woman's fault if you can't control yourself is it?"
>
>This is a vital question that every man needs to answer, it's part of
>the way society is changing for the better, it's part of the journey of
>women as property to women as master's of their own domain. But part of
>that is men realizing that it's no longer acceptable to claim that it's
>a woman's fault if she's raped; she should be able to walk down the
>street naked without any man attacking her. Any other attitude about
>women leads to societies where women are hidden away in purdah, as in
>Muslim societies and in India.

>So now that I've started an important discussion on this subject, please
>answer DA's question.

I can't believe you are so intellectually challenged.

duke

unread,

Jan 8, 2013, 8:30:18 AM1/8/13

to

On Mon, 7 Jan 2013 21:55:14 -0800 (PST), Devils Advocaat <manky...@gmail.com>
wrote:

But jdyke is still confused.

duke

unread,

Jan 8, 2013, 8:33:15 AM1/8/13

to

On Mon, 7 Jan 2013 21:52:01 -0800 (PST), Devils Advocaat <manky...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>On 7 Jan, 13:05, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>> On Sun, 6 Jan 2013 06:52:54 -0800 (PST), Devils Advocaat <mankygo...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >On 5 Jan, 18:14, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>> >> On Fri, 4 Jan 2013 05:49:07 -0800 (PST), "Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net>
>> >> wrote:
>>
>> >> >"italian priest: women invite violence "
>>
>> >> >Republican, no doubt.
>>
>> >> The more you show, you more you invite.
>>
>> >So it's the woman's fault if you can't control yourself is it?
>>
>> Are you a queer?

>Poor little duke, thinks a man who can control himself and his urges
>must be queer.

Not the issue. Jdyke is one of those fruitcakes that thinks there's no limit to
what a woman can show, but the man must not get turned on. After all, the
little darling is sugar and spice and everything nice, but the man is dirt.

unread,

Jan 8, 2013, 9:08:55 PM1/8/13

to

In article <e18oe850d59konblm...@4ax.com>,
duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:

Men obviously CAN'T control themselves if a provocatively dressed woman
causes them to commit the horrible crime of rape.

A woman should be able to walk through the streets completely naked if
she chooses without being raped. That is, if men were actually capable
of controlling themselves.

Jeanne Douglas

unread,

Jan 8, 2013, 9:10:00 PM1/8/13

to

In article <rr7oe8hla9g4mbv73...@4ax.com>,
duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:

> On Mon, 7 Jan 2013 21:52:01 -0800 (PST), Devils Advocaat
> <manky...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >On 7 Jan, 13:05, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> >> On Sun, 6 Jan 2013 06:52:54 -0800 (PST), Devils Advocaat
> >> <mankygo...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >On 5 Jan, 18:14, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> >> >> On Fri, 4 Jan 2013 05:49:07 -0800 (PST), "Ramon F. Herrera"
> >> >> <ra...@conexus.net>
> >> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >> >"italian priest: women invite violence "
> >>
> >> >> >Republican, no doubt.
> >>
> >> >> The more you show, you more you invite.
> >>
> >> >So it's the woman's fault if you can't control yourself is it?
> >>
> >> Are you a queer?
>
> >Poor little duke, thinks a man who can control himself and his urges
> >must be queer.
>
> Not the issue. Jdyke is one of those fruitcakes that thinks there's no limit
> to
> what a woman can show, but the man must not get turned on.

Who said anything about a man's not getting turned on?

The issue is whether a man has the self-control to halt him from raping
someone who is turning him on.

Jeanne Douglas

unread,

Jan 8, 2013, 9:11:09 PM1/8/13

to

In article <jn7oe89gl34r9h4bq...@4ax.com>,

duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:

> On Mon, 07 Jan 2013 16:11:23 -0800, Jeanne Douglas <hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >In article <70ile8hmpjhhjkncr...@4ax.com>,
> > duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:
> >
> >> On Sun, 6 Jan 2013 06:52:54 -0800 (PST), Devils Advocaat
> >> <manky...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >On 5 Jan, 18:14, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> >> >> On Fri, 4 Jan 2013 05:49:07 -0800 (PST), "Ramon F. Herrera"
> >> >> <ra...@conexus.net>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> >"italian priest: women invite violence "
> >> >>
> >> >> >Republican, no doubt.
> >> >>
> >> >> The more you show, you more you invite.
> >> >
> >> >So it's the woman's fault if you can't control yourself is it?
> >>
> >> Are you a queer?
> >
> >Why did you ask this question? What does it have to do with the subject
> >at hand or the question you were asked?
>
> Some of us have more going for us than you do.

What the fuck does that mean?

> >Why don't you try again and actually answer the question DA asked you:
> >
> >"So it's the woman's fault if you can't control yourself is it?"
> >
> >This is a vital question that every man needs to answer, it's part of
> >the way society is changing for the better, it's part of the journey of
> >women as property to women as master's of their own domain. But part of
> >that is men realizing that it's no longer acceptable to claim that it's
> >a woman's fault if she's raped; she should be able to walk down the
> >street naked without any man attacking her. Any other attitude about
> >women leads to societies where women are hidden away in purdah, as in
> >Muslim societies and in India.
>
> >So now that I've started an important discussion on this subject, please
> >answer DA's question.
>
> I can't believe you are so intellectually challenged.

Thank you for confessing that you have no answer to the vitally
important issues I have raised.

�RLMeasures

unread,

Jan 9, 2013, 8:12:36 AM1/9/13

to

In article <hlwdjsd2-FE4043...@news.giganews.com>, Jeanne

�� I have seen many women who could easily do this.

>That is, if men were actually capable
> of controlling themselves.

�� female pheremones give women a tactical advantage in this area. The
problem is that when exposed to woman scent the big strong man's Jacobs
gland begins diverting blood flow from the brain's logic unit into the
penis. The effect: the logic unit slows down and the penis becomes
erect. This gives women a distinct leg up on men.

duke

unread,

Jan 9, 2013, 8:39:04 AM1/9/13

to

On Tue, 08 Jan 2013 18:11:09 -0800, Jeanne Douglas <hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com>

wrote:

>In article <jn7oe89gl34r9h4bq...@4ax.com>,
> duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 07 Jan 2013 16:11:23 -0800, Jeanne Douglas <hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >In article <70ile8hmpjhhjkncr...@4ax.com>,
>> > duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Sun, 6 Jan 2013 06:52:54 -0800 (PST), Devils Advocaat
>> >> <manky...@gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >On 5 Jan, 18:14, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>> >> >> On Fri, 4 Jan 2013 05:49:07 -0800 (PST), "Ramon F. Herrera"
>> >> >> <ra...@conexus.net>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >"italian priest: women invite violence "
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >Republican, no doubt.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> The more you show, you more you invite.
>> >> >
>> >> >So it's the woman's fault if you can't control yourself is it?
>> >>
>> >> Are you a queer?
>> >
>> >Why did you ask this question? What does it have to do with the subject
>> >at hand or the question you were asked?
>>
>> Some of us have more going for us than you do.
>
> What the fuck does that mean?

Frog legs.

>> >Why don't you try again and actually answer the question DA asked you:
>> >"So it's the woman's fault if you can't control yourself is it?"

>> >This is a vital question that every man needs to answer, it's part of
>> >the way society is changing for the better, it's part of the journey of
>> >women as property to women as master's of their own domain. But part of
>> >that is men realizing that it's no longer acceptable to claim that it's
>> >a woman's fault if she's raped; she should be able to walk down the
>> >street naked without any man attacking her. Any other attitude about
>> >women leads to societies where women are hidden away in purdah, as in
>> >Muslim societies and in India.

>> >So now that I've started an important discussion on this subject, please
>> >answer DA's question.
>> I can't believe you are so intellectually challenged.
>Thank you for confessing that you have no answer to the vitally
>important issues I have raised.

Response: None.

duke

unread,

Jan 9, 2013, 8:40:43 AM1/9/13

to

On Tue, 08 Jan 2013 18:08:55 -0800, Jeanne Douglas <hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com>

Are you first establishing "rape" then saying man can't control himself? Did
the woman invite it by the way she dressed?

>A woman should be able to walk through the streets completely naked if
>she chooses without being raped. That is, if men were actually capable
>of controlling themselves.

She's a slut.

duke

unread,

Jan 9, 2013, 8:41:23 AM1/9/13

to

I think Jdyke is bitter about that.

duke

unread,

Jan 9, 2013, 8:43:00 AM1/9/13

to

On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 07:16:12 -0800 (PST), Devils Advocaat <manky...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>> >> >> The more you show, you more you invite.
>> >> >So it's the woman's fault if you can't control yourself is it?
>> >> Are you a queer?
>> >Poor little duke, thinks a man who can control himself and his urges
>> >must be queer.

>> Not the issue. �Jdyke is one of those fruitcakes that thinks there's no limit to
>> what a woman can show, but the man must not get turned on. �After all, the
>> little darling is sugar and spice and everything nice, but the man is dirt.

>She never said the man shouldn't get turned on.

Yes, she easily implied that much.

>But you insist the woman is to blame if you can't control yourself.
>And you suggested that I was a queer because I have self-control.
>Given that, it should come as no surprise that I disagree with you.

Like who cares?

duke

unread,

Jan 9, 2013, 8:43:41 AM1/9/13

to

On Tue, 08 Jan 2013 18:10:00 -0800, Jeanne Douglas <hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com>
wrote:

Why is she asking for sex?

Devils Advocaat

unread,

Jan 9, 2013, 10:21:55 AM1/9/13

to

On 9 Jan, 13:43, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 07:16:12 -0800 (PST), Devils Advocaat <mankygo...@gmail.com>

> wrote:
>
> >> >> >> The more you show, you more you invite.
> >> >> >So it's the woman's fault if you can't control yourself is it?
> >> >> Are you a queer?
> >> >Poor little duke, thinks a man who can control himself and his urges
> >> >must be queer.
> >> Not the issue. Jdyke is one of those fruitcakes that thinks there's no limit to
> >> what a woman can show, but the man must not get turned on. After all, the
> >> little darling is sugar and spice and everything nice, but the man is dirt.
> >She never said the man shouldn't get turned on.
>
> Yes, she easily implied that much.

No she didn't, if that were the case she wouldn't be on my side.

>
> >But you insist the woman is to blame if you can't control yourself.
> >And you suggested that I was a queer because I have self-control.
> >Given that, it should come as no surprise that I disagree with you.
>
> Like who cares?

Like, you do. Otherwise you'd not bother interacting.

Don Martin

unread,

Jan 9, 2013, 10:55:03 AM1/9/13

to

Well, I can control myself in such a case, but I cannot answer for the
mosquitos.

--
aa #2278 Never mind "proof." Where is your evidence?
BAAWA Chief Assistant to the Assistant Chief Heckler
Fidei defensor (Hon. Antipodean)
The Squeeky Wheel: http://home.comcast.net/~drdonmartin/

�RLMeasures

unread,

Jan 9, 2013, 10:55:30 AM1/9/13

to

In article <arsqe852qitsb5vfa...@4ax.com>, duke

� you have an agenda.

duke

unread,

Jan 9, 2013, 2:54:05 PM1/9/13

to

On Wed, 9 Jan 2013 07:21:55 -0800 (PST), Devils Advocaat <manky...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>On 9 Jan, 13:43, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>> On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 07:16:12 -0800 (PST), Devils Advocaat <mankygo...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >> The more you show, you more you invite.
>> >> >> >So it's the woman's fault if you can't control yourself is it?
>> >> >> Are you a queer?
>> >> >Poor little duke, thinks a man who can control himself and his urges
>> >> >must be queer.
>> >> Not the issue. Jdyke is one of those fruitcakes that thinks there's no limit to
>> >> what a woman can show, but the man must not get turned on. After all, the
>> >> little darling is sugar and spice and everything nice, but the man is dirt.
>> >She never said the man shouldn't get turned on.
>>
>> Yes, she easily implied that much.
>
>No she didn't, if that were the case she wouldn't be on my side.

Are you a dyke too?

NefeshBarYochai

unread,

Jan 9, 2013, 3:04:26 PM1/9/13

to

On Jan 9, 12:54 pm, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Jan 2013 07:21:55 -0800 (PST), Devils Advocaat <mankygo...@gmail.com>

Never trust a bull dyke especially if she thinks she's some kind of
biker.

Alan Ferris

unread,

Jan 9, 2013, 6:42:47 PM1/9/13

to

On Tue, 08 Jan 2013 17:44:14 -0700, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:

>> Men can control themselves even when women invite action by the way they dress
>> and act.
>
>Real men can, but can duckgumbo?

Yes, he only likes to abuse children:

"Ever wonder how many male parents teasingly pinched their
young daughters on their newly budding breasts, or female
parents "touch" their young son's genitals in just the
wrong way - only now to have to stand accused of a charge
of sexual molestation of children."
- duke (Earl J Weber)

"only a fool fails to understand that a lot of fathers
teasingly pinch their daughters and mothers teasingly touch
their sons. It's called child molestation outside the
family unit."
- duke (Earl J Weber)

"I was talking about a loving family teasingly pinching
nipples (pre breast type) and comparing how that's quite
alright in a family setting but clearly and quickly labeled
as child molestation outside the family setting."
- duke (Earl J Weber)

"As I've stated before, the comment is from a ng discussion
addressing a double standard - what is considered "ok" in
the family setting quickly becomes molestation by an outsider.
You can see that in the comment itself."
- duke (Earl J Weber)

Jeanne Douglas

unread,

Jan 9, 2013, 9:41:15 PM1/9/13

to

In article <lvsqe8925pc7t3g22...@4ax.com>,

See, there's your problem. Who says the way she dresses means a woman is
asking for sex?

A woman should be able to walk down the street buck naked with no fear
of rape.\

Jeanne Douglas

unread,

Jan 9, 2013, 9:41:47 PM1/9/13

to

In article <cssqe8lsr31k9l70f...@4ax.com>,

duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:

> On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 07:16:12 -0800 (PST), Devils Advocaat
> <manky...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >> >> >> The more you show, you more you invite.
> >> >> >So it's the woman's fault if you can't control yourself is it?
> >> >> Are you a queer?
> >> >Poor little duke, thinks a man who can control himself and his urges
> >> >must be queer.
>
> >> Not the issue. �Jdyke is one of those fruitcakes that thinks there's no
> >> limit to
> >> what a woman can show, but the man must not get turned on. �After all, the
> >> little darling is sugar and spice and everything nice, but the man is
> >> dirt.
>
> >She never said the man shouldn't get turned on.
>
> Yes, she easily implied that much.

Of course she didn't.

> >But you insist the woman is to blame if you can't control yourself.
> >And you suggested that I was a queer because I have self-control.
> >Given that, it should come as no surprise that I disagree with you.
>
> Like who cares?

Ahhhh, poor poor dukie.

Jeanne Douglas

unread,

Jan 9, 2013, 9:42:46 PM1/9/13

to

In article <5osqe8dcnjrgn50rb...@4ax.com>,

Absolutely not.

> >A woman should be able to walk through the streets completely naked if
> >she chooses without being raped. That is, if men were actually capable
> >of controlling themselves.
>
> She's a slut.

Why?

Jeanne Douglas

unread,

Jan 9, 2013, 9:43:51 PM1/9/13

to

In article <cmsqe8tde1qvdekus...@4ax.com>,

We don't need any response from you. You've already made it clear that
you think women should be forced to wear burkas because men have
absolutely no control over their hormones.

In other words, you have confirmed that you are part of the Christian
Taliban.

thomas p.

unread,

Jan 10, 2013, 1:37:14 AM1/10/13

to

"Jeanne Douglas" <hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com> skrev i meddelelsen
news:hlwdjsd2-A3BBCF...@news.giganews.com...

Or that asking for sex equals asking to be raped. It is depressing that
some men can still use the idiotic and vicious phrase "She was asking for
it".

>
> A woman should be able to walk down the street buck naked with no fear
> of rape.\
>
> --
> JD
>
> "Osama Bin Laden is dead and GM is alive."--VP Joseph Biden

--
thomas p

Ignorance is the mother of devotion.

David Hume

Alan Ferris

unread,

Jan 10, 2013, 8:38:25 AM1/10/13

to

It's because no woman would want them. Have you seen Earl?

----
Grotesquely Obese (Earl J Weber):
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1385182548

Earl's Obese boyfriend (P Barker):
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1339225483

St. Paul said that "their god is the belly " (Phil 3:19)
----

hypatiab7

unread,

Jan 10, 2013, 9:22:32 AM1/10/13

to

On Saturday, January 5, 2013 1:14:33 PM UTC-5, duke wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Jan 2013 05:49:07 -0800 (PST), "Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net>
>
> wrote:

> >"italian priest: women invite violence "

> >Republican, no doubt.

> The more you show, you more you invite.

You can't control yourself, can you, perv?

hypatiab7

unread,

Jan 10, 2013, 9:27:57 AM1/10/13

to

On Saturday, January 5, 2013 10:23:40 PM UTC-5, Jeanne Douglas wrote:
> In article <pbrge819t80pmooul...@4ax.com>,

> duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Jan 2013 05:49:07 -0800 (PST), "Ramon F. Herrera"
> > <ra...@conexus.net> wrote:

Italian priest: women invite violence "

> > >Republican, no doubt.

> > The more you show, you more you invite.

> And dukie once again says rape can be justified.

> When do you start demanding that women wear burkhas to avoid "inviting
> violence" from men?

Actually, it's men like Earl who need to be kept in burqas.
They have no self control and are very emotional. They need
to be controlled as the children they are. I wonder if anyone
has checked Earl's criminal background.

duke

unread,

Jan 10, 2013, 9:29:04 AM1/10/13

to

>> >A woman should be able to walk through the streets completely naked if
>> >she chooses without being raped. That is, if men were actually capable
>> >of controlling themselves.

>> She's a slut.
>Why?

Why do you think men are rapists?

duke

unread,

Jan 10, 2013, 9:37:29 AM1/10/13

to

On Wed, 9 Jan 2013 12:04:26 -0800 (PST), NefeshBarYochai <lbit...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>On Jan 9, 12:54 pm, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>> On Wed, 9 Jan 2013 07:21:55 -0800 (PST), Devils Advocaat <mankygo...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >On 9 Jan, 13:43, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>> >> On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 07:16:12 -0800 (PST), Devils Advocaat <mankygo...@gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >> >> The more you show, you more you invite.
>> >> >> >> >So it's the woman's fault if you can't control yourself is it?
>> >> >> >> Are you a queer?
>> >> >> >Poor little duke, thinks a man who can control himself and his urges
>> >> >> >must be queer.
>> >> >> Not the issue. Jdyke is one of those fruitcakes that thinks there's no limit to
>> >> >> what a woman can show, but the man must not get turned on. After all, the
>> >> >> little darling is sugar and spice and everything nice, but the man is dirt.
>> >> >She never said the man shouldn't get turned on.
>>
>> >> Yes, she easily implied that much.

>> >No she didn't, if that were the case she wouldn't be on my side.

>> Are you a dyke too?

>Never trust a bull dyke especially if she thinks she's some kind of
>biker.

Thanks.

duke

unread,

Jan 10, 2013, 9:39:46 AM1/10/13

to

On Wed, 09 Jan 2013 18:41:47 -0800, Jeanne Douglas <hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com>
wrote:

>In article <cssqe8lsr31k9l70f...@4ax.com>,
> duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 07:16:12 -0800 (PST), Devils Advocaat
>> <manky...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >> The more you show, you more you invite.
>> >> >> >So it's the woman's fault if you can't control yourself is it?
>> >> >> Are you a queer?
>> >> >Poor little duke, thinks a man who can control himself and his urges
>> >> >must be queer.
>>
>> >> Not the issue. Jdyke is one of those fruitcakes that thinks there's no
>> >> limit to
>> >> what a woman can show, but the man must not get turned on. After all, the
>> >> little darling is sugar and spice and everything nice, but the man is
>> >> dirt.
>>
>> >She never said the man shouldn't get turned on.
>>
>> Yes, she easily implied that much.
>Of course she didn't.

As I said before, a lady friend confirmed to me that women don't have common
sense. A slut wants it.

>> >But you insist the woman is to blame if you can't control yourself.
>> >And you suggested that I was a queer because I have self-control.
>> >Given that, it should come as no surprise that I disagree with you.
>> Like who cares?

>Ahhhh, poor poor dukie.

I'm a very happy Roman Catholic.

duke

unread,

Jan 10, 2013, 9:40:46 AM1/10/13

to

On Wed, 09 Jan 2013 18:41:15 -0800, Jeanne Douglas <hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com>

And there you have it, ladies and gentlemen. Rape is out of the question when
she is begging for sex.

hypatiab7

unread,

Jan 10, 2013, 9:41:21 AM1/10/13

to

On Tuesday, January 8, 2013 8:29:43 AM UTC-5, duke wrote:
> On Mon, 07 Jan 2013 16:11:23 -0800, Jeanne Douglas <hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com>
> wrote:
>In article <70ile8hmpjhhjkncr...@4ax.com>,

> > duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:
> >> On Sun, 6 Jan 2013 06:52:54 -0800 (PST), Devils Advocaat

> >> <manky...@gmail.com>wrote:

> >> >On 5 Jan, 18:14, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> >> >> On Fri, 4 Jan 2013 05:49:07 -0800 (PST), "Ramon F. Herrera"
> >> >> <ra...@conexus.net>wrote:

> >> >> >"italian priest: women invite violence "

> >> >> >Republican, no doubt.

> >> >> The more you show, you more you invite.

> >> >So it's the woman's fault if you can't control yourself is it?

> >> Are you a queer?

> >Why did you ask this question? What does it have to do with the subject
> >at hand or the question you were asked?

> Some of us have more going for us than you do.

> >Why don't you try again and actually answer the question DA asked you:

>"So it's the woman's fault if you can't control yourself is it?"

> >This is a vital question that every man needs to answer, it's part of
> >the way society is changing for the better, it's part of the journey of
> >women as property to women as master's of their own domain. But part of
> >that is men realizing that it's no longer acceptable to claim that it's
> >a woman's fault if she's raped; she should be able to walk down the
> >street naked without any man attacking her. Any other attitude about
> >women leads to societies where women are hidden away in purdah, as in
> >Muslim societies and in India.

> >So now that I've started an important discussion on this subject, please
> >answer DA's question.

> I can't believe you are so intellectually challenged.

And, you are too much of a coward to answer the question.
Just as you always do, you run away shouting childish
taunts behind you and the tail between your legs.

duke

unread,

Jan 10, 2013, 9:41:20 AM1/10/13

to

On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 07:37:14 +0100, "thomas p." <gud...@yahoo.com> wrote:

Especially when "no" really means "yes".

unread,

Jan 10, 2013, 4:50:17 PM1/10/13

to

In article <f4kte89hj9am15m0m...@4ax.com>,

duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:

> On Wed, 09 Jan 2013 18:42:46 -0800, Jeanne Douglas <hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
> >> >Men obviously CAN'T control themselves if a provocatively dressed woman
> >> >causes them to commit the horrible crime of rape.
> >
> >> Are you first establishing "rape" then saying man can't control himself?
> >> Did the woman invite it by the way she dressed?
>
> >Absolutely not.
>
> She didn't?? Then why do you think men can't control themselves. A man can
> easily control himself. But then again there are rapists and there are
> sluts.
>
> >> >A woman should be able to walk through the streets completely naked if
> >> >she chooses without being raped. That is, if men were actually capable
> >> >of controlling themselves.
>
> >> She's a slut.
> >Why?
>
> Why do you think men are rapists?

I don't.

I only think rapists are rapists.

Devils Advocaat

unread,

Jan 11, 2013, 1:19:35 AM1/11/13

to

On 10 Jan, 21:48, Jeanne Douglas <hlwdj...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
> In article <tlkte8lasg0spv7bqqki5bk55hdf45a...@4ax.com>,
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> > On Wed, 09 Jan 2013 18:41:15 -0800, Jeanne Douglas <hlwdj...@NOSPAMgmail.com>
> > wrote:
>
> > >In article <lvsqe8925pc7t3g22g74pldjfa66mbe...@4ax.com>,

> > > duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>
> > >> On Tue, 08 Jan 2013 18:10:00 -0800, Jeanne Douglas

> > >> <hlwdj...@NOSPAMgmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
>
> > >> >In article <rr7oe8hla9g4mbv732hhes60l84821j...@4ax.com>,

> > >> > duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>
> > >> >> On Mon, 7 Jan 2013 21:52:01 -0800 (PST), Devils Advocaat

> > >> >> <mankygo...@gmail.com>

Poor little duke thinks with the wrong head.

You know, the one without a brain. :)

duke

unread,

Jan 11, 2013, 3:48:48 PM1/11/13

to

It's been continuous for months now.

duke

unread,

Jan 11, 2013, 3:49:19 PM1/11/13

to

On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 13:50:17 -0800, Jeanne Douglas <hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com>

wrote:

>In article <f4kte89hj9am15m0m...@4ax.com>,
> duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 09 Jan 2013 18:42:46 -0800, Jeanne Douglas <hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> >> >Men obviously CAN'T control themselves if a provocatively dressed woman
>> >> >causes them to commit the horrible crime of rape.
>> >
>> >> Are you first establishing "rape" then saying man can't control himself?
>> >> Did the woman invite it by the way she dressed?
>>
>> >Absolutely not.
>>
>> She didn't?? Then why do you think men can't control themselves. A man can
>> easily control himself. But then again there are rapists and there are
>> sluts.
>>
>> >> >A woman should be able to walk through the streets completely naked if
>> >> >she chooses without being raped. That is, if men were actually capable
>> >> >of controlling themselves.
>>
>> >> She's a slut.
>> >Why?
>>
>> Why do you think men are rapists?
>
>I don't.
>
>I only think rapists are rapists.

So why do you think men can't control themselves?

duke

unread,

Jan 11, 2013, 3:49:51 PM1/11/13

to

On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 13:48:37 -0800, Jeanne Douglas <hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com>

She flashing all over the place.

•RLMeasures

unread,

Jan 11, 2013, 6:18:27 PM1/11/13

to

In article <2lu0f85dl4hts6jsp...@4ax.com>, duke

• She seems to be more competent than you would like.

Jeanne Douglas

unread,

Jan 11, 2013, 7:18:56 PM1/11/13

to

In article <umu0f8lg18dptlrkv...@4ax.com>,

Why do you think that is begging for sex?

Jeanne Douglas

unread,

Jan 11, 2013, 7:19:35 PM1/11/13

to

In article <rlu0f81v4usfchmec...@4ax.com>,

Where did I claim that all men can't control themselves?

duke

unread,

Jan 12, 2013, 9:52:11 AM1/12/13

to

You're not paying attention. She's worst than a 3 years old following an answer
with "why".

duke

unread,

Jan 12, 2013, 9:54:07 AM1/12/13

to

On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 16:19:35 -0800, Jeanne Douglas <hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com>

Does this statement from you above sound familiar?
*****

Men obviously CAN'T control themselves if a provocatively dressed woman
causes them to commit the horrible crime of rape.

*****

duke

unread,

Jan 12, 2013, 9:55:14 AM1/12/13

to

On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 16:18:56 -0800, Jeanne Douglas <hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com>

Has your mother explained the birds and the bees to you yet?

•RLMeasures

unread,

Jan 12, 2013, 10:56:01 AM1/12/13

to

In article <h3u2f89mriu8dcier...@4ax.com>, duke

• You are not paying attention Duke -- it's "worse than" not 'worst
than'. Where is Sister Dominica?.

Jeanne Douglas

unread,

Jan 12, 2013, 5:59:40 PM1/12/13

to

In article <s8u2f8p6lq88fe9a4...@4ax.com>,

Nope. We had real sex education in school.

But, of course, everybody knows your comment was nothing but another
lame attempt at deflection.

So why don't you try again and actually answer the question you were
asked.

Jeanne Douglas

unread,

Jan 14, 2013, 6:24:42 PM1/14/13

to

In article <r-1401130...@10.0.1.3>, r...@somis.org (•RLMeasures)

Yep. He's admitting that he lost.

•RLMeasures

unread,

Jan 14, 2013, 6:48:05 PM1/14/13

to

In article <kr39f8di4clh4ud0p...@4ax.com>, duke

• is Duke losing it?

•RLMeasures

unread,

Jan 14, 2013, 6:57:52 PM1/14/13

to

In article <hlwdjsd2-9A9B31...@news.giganews.com>, Jeanne

• To us it's apparent but he is unlikely to ever admit such to himself.

duke

unread,

Jan 15, 2013, 1:59:25 PM1/15/13

to

Her house is not for me.

duke

unread,

Jan 15, 2013, 2:01:53 PM1/15/13

to

I'm not good at accepting fabrications.

Virgil

unread,

Jan 15, 2013, 4:14:32 PM1/15/13

to

In article <fr9bf8tmojr9fba3j...@4ax.com>,

duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:

> I'm not good at accepting fabrications.

You are far better at making up your own!

>
> The dukester, American - American
> ********************************************
> You can't fix stupid.
> ********************************************

And if you can't fix stupid
then duke the duck is out of luck!!!
--

Virgil

unread,

Jan 15, 2013, 4:15:48 PM1/15/13

to

In article <un9bf8196e2idmcnc...@4ax.com>,

duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:

> Her house is not for me.

Duckgumbo is not yet housebroken.

>
> The dukester, American - American
> ********************************************
> You can't fix stupid.
> ********************************************

•RLMeasures

unread,

Jan 15, 2013, 6:37:06 PM1/15/13

to

In article <un9bf8196e2idmcnc...@4ax.com>, duke

• definitely. She would make mincemeat of you.

•RLMeasures

unread,

Jan 15, 2013, 6:38:37 PM1/15/13

to

In article <fr9bf8tmojr9fba3j...@4ax.com>, duke

<duckg...@cox.net> wrote:

> On Mon, 14 Jan 2013 15:57:52 -0800, r...@somis.org (•RLMeasures) wrote:
>
> >In article <hlwdjsd2-9A9B31...@news.giganews.com>, Jeanne
> >Douglas <hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> In article <r-1401130...@10.0.1.3>, r...@somis.org (•RLMeasures)
> >> wrote:
> >>

> >> > ...
> >> > > >• they are not the weaker sex.

> >> > >
> >> > > The 6" between her ears is best known for being a vacant lot that puts
> >> > > Detroit
> >> > > to shame.
> >> > >
> >> > • ad hominen time.
> >>
> >> Yep. He's admitting that he lost.
> >
> >• To us it's apparent but he is unlikely to ever admit such to himself.
>
> I'm not good at accepting fabrications.
>

• You seem to have no trouble producing them.

duke

unread,

Jan 16, 2013, 11:42:38 AM1/16/13

to

On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 15:37:06 -0800, r...@somis.org (•RLMeasures) wrote:

>> >> >> The 6" between her ears is best known for being a vacant lot that
>> >puts Detroit
>> >> >> to shame.
>> >> >>
>> >> >• ad hominen time.
>> >>
>> >> She built her house.
>> >>
>> >• is Duke losing it?
>>
>> Her house is not for me.
>>
>• definitely. She would make mincemeat of you.

Jdyke?? I seriously doubt it.

duke

unread,

Jan 16, 2013, 11:43:21 AM1/16/13

to

Oh, that's so hard for me that I never do it.