On 5/12/2012 11:32 AM, chibiabos wrote:
> They're = They fucking are.
> Their = Shows fucking possession.
> There = Specifies a fucking location.
> You're = You fucking are.
> Your = Shows fucking possession.
> We're = We fucking are.
> Were = Past fucking tense of "are."
> Where = Specifies a fucking location.
> Than = A fucking comparison.
> Then = A point in fucking time.
> To = Where it's fucking going.
> Too = An excessive fucking amount.
> Two = A fucking number.
> Lose = You fucking lost it.
> Loose = You fucking untied it.
> Judgment = For fucking Americans.
> Judgement = For fucking Brits.
>
> The grammar nazis have finally snapped and will take no more of your
> fucking nonsense.
>
> Please let me know if I've fucking missed any.
>
> -chib
>
Great fucking list. I'd add a few more. 'That' is regularly used where
'who' is correct. e.g "He's the guy that did it." Misuse of 'Who's' and
'whose' probably deserves a mention as well. The misuse of 'less' and
'fewer' has become sufficiently common that the distinction will likely
soon be deemed an artifact of an earlier era. Misuse of 'Who' and
'whom', 'he' and 'him', 'she' and 'her, and 'I' and 'me' also make my
list. I may be a bit of a stickler on those as my father always
responded to "Who is it?" with "It's I." The misuse of 'myself' grates
on me. "Please submit responses to this memo to Susan or myself." Yikes!
In the late '80s I read a newspaper column by a grammar maven - perhaps
William Saffire or Edwin Newman - that inveighed against the then
current crop of journalism graduates who didn't know the difference
between 'due to' and 'owing to'. I could hardly believe that anyone
ignorant of the distinction could be considered an English speaker at
all. Of course, I had no idea that there was a difference so I set out
to discover what it was. My modest library of grammar guidebooks gave no
clue. Visits to public libraries in Denver were no help. A few years
later, I moved to South Dakota where I found the answer in a old grammar
text in the Vermillion public library. 'Due to' is an adjectival
construction and must modify a noun. 'Owing to' is an adverbial
construction and can modify a verb. Ergo, 'Due to rain, the game was
canceled.' is incorrect unless the game itself was the result of rain
and was canceled for some other reason.
I regret that I am not fucking clever enough to to put my fucking
quibbles in a fucking form suitable for your fucking list.
(It's a well demonstrated usenet phenomenon that a person who criticizes
another's grammar invariably commits at least one grammatical violation
in the critical post. I look forward to reading the corrections to this
post with a bit of apprehension.)