Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
QUESTION Evolution
0 views
Skip to first unread message
BroilJAB
Oct 26, 2012, 4:24:30 PM10/26/12
to
Today my teacher told us that Darwin was right.
That Peppered Moths nailed to trees was science.
We should believe in Evolution despite the facts.
When I questioned Evolution, I was reprimanded.
Is Evolution a religion immune to skepticism?
That Peppered Moths nailed to trees was science.
We should believe in Evolution despite the facts.
When I questioned Evolution, I was reprimanded.
Is Evolution a religion immune to skepticism?
joeturn
Oct 26, 2012, 6:39:06 PM10/26/12
to
Evolution proves that MAN was not fashioned out of clay!
Uergil
Oct 26, 2012, 7:24:39 PM10/26/12
to
In article
<26d68f56-1e1f-4e3f...@i8g2000vbq.googlegroups.com>,
And today your teacher was right.
> That Peppered Moths nailed to trees was science.
Observations of the relative frequencies of light versus dark peppered
moths in industrialized areas of England was was science.
Nailing them to trees was photography.
We should believe in Evolution because of the facts.
> When I questioned Evolution, I was reprimanded.
It is your questioning of well established facts, and your replacing
those facts with irrelevancies that deserves reprimand.
> Is Evolution a religion immune to skepticism?
The only valid way of questioning Evolution, or any other science, is by
producing objective physical observations which conflict with that
science's theories.
But creationists like Liarboi Broiljab can't find any such objective
physical observation conflicting with Evolution, 'cause there isn't any.
On the other hand, considerable of the objective physical evidence of
Evolution and of several other sciences conflicts directly with many of
the claims of creationism, thus falsifying it.
--
"Ignorance is preferable to error, and he is less
remote from the- truth who believes nothing than
he who believes what is wrong.
Thomas Jefferson
<26d68f56-1e1f-4e3f...@i8g2000vbq.googlegroups.com>,
And today your teacher was right.
> That Peppered Moths nailed to trees was science.
moths in industrialized areas of England was was science.
Nailing them to trees was photography.
We should believe in Evolution because of the facts.
> When I questioned Evolution, I was reprimanded.
those facts with irrelevancies that deserves reprimand.
> Is Evolution a religion immune to skepticism?
producing objective physical observations which conflict with that
science's theories.
But creationists like Liarboi Broiljab can't find any such objective
physical observation conflicting with Evolution, 'cause there isn't any.
On the other hand, considerable of the objective physical evidence of
Evolution and of several other sciences conflicts directly with many of
the claims of creationism, thus falsifying it.
--
"Ignorance is preferable to error, and he is less
remote from the- truth who believes nothing than
he who believes what is wrong.
Thomas Jefferson
Davej
Oct 26, 2012, 9:37:35 PM10/26/12
to
On Oct 26, 3:24 pm, BroilJAB <DesignDen...@wmconnect.com> wrote:
> Today my teacher told us that Darwin was right.
>
That's because Creationism doesn't have any "facts." More than 99% of
> Today my teacher told us that Darwin was right.
>
all known species are already extinct so I guess you'd have to say
that Gawd should get a failing grade as a "Creator."
Bob Casanova
Oct 27, 2012, 1:18:16 PM10/27/12
to
On Fri, 26 Oct 2012 13:24:30 -0700 (PDT), the following
appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by BroilJAB
<Design...@wmconnect.com>:
>Today my teacher told us that Darwin was right.
Then your teacher was oversimplifying.
The Biblical Creation story, however, is not factual; it's
allegory. And that's no oversimplification. HTH.
--
Bob C.
"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless
appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by BroilJAB
<Design...@wmconnect.com>:
>Today my teacher told us that Darwin was right.
The Biblical Creation story, however, is not factual; it's
allegory. And that's no oversimplification. HTH.
--
Bob C.
"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless
linuxgal
Nov 10, 2012, 2:59:14 PM11/10/12
to
ones that liked to swim.
--
Monopolistic Ignominious Corporation Resolute On Squeezing Out Fair Trade
0 new messages