Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Ode of a NAKED deviant - [Youtube]

4 views
Skip to first unread message

us4...@aol.com

unread,
Oct 15, 2012, 8:09:05 PM10/15/12
to

Uergil

unread,
Oct 15, 2012, 11:02:39 PM10/15/12
to
In article <799p78h10ust8e625...@4ax.com>,
us4...@aol.com wrote:

http://vitals.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/10/04/14224132-free-birth-control-cu
ts-abortion-rate-dramatically-study-finds?lite
--
"Ignorance is preferable to error, and he is less
remote from the- truth who believes nothing than
he who believes what is wrong.
Thomas Jefferson

us4...@aol.com

unread,
Nov 4, 2012, 7:10:46 PM11/4/12
to
http://youtu.be/2hgGj8kbuRk

u4z

us4...@aol.com wrote in message
<799p78h10ust8e625...@4ax.com>
Subject: "Ode of a NAKED deviant - [Youtube]" :

>http://youtu.be/2hgGj8kbuRk
>
>u4z

Uergil

unread,
Nov 4, 2012, 6:26:11 PM11/4/12
to

Jeanne Douglas

unread,
Nov 4, 2012, 7:38:19 PM11/4/12
to
Where's this alleged atheist having a bad day?

--
JD

"Osama Bin Laden is dead and GM is alive."--VP Joseph Biden

us4...@aol.com

unread,
Nov 4, 2012, 8:46:59 PM11/4/12
to
Your mother was obviously a lesbian, and your father, an anti-christ sob.
This vid is dedicated to you and your sinful pagan dead ancestors....

http://youtu.be/2hgGj8kbuRk

u4z

Uergil <Uer...@uer.net> wrote in message
<Uergil-107496....@BIGNEWS.USENETMONSTER.COM>
Subject: "Re: US4SIN having a bad day - [Youtube]" :

linuxgal

unread,
Nov 4, 2012, 9:29:25 PM11/4/12
to
us4...@aol.com wrote:
> Your mother was obviously a lesbian, and your father, an anti-christ sob.

Well, your mother was a hamster, and your father smelt of elderberries.

--
Monopolistic Ignominious Corporation Resolute On Squeezing Out Fair Trade

Uirgil

unread,
Nov 4, 2012, 11:01:52 PM11/4/12
to
In article <u96e98l6rqdgjg861...@4ax.com>,
us4...@aol.com wrote:

> Your mother was obviously a lesbian, and your father, an anti-christ sob.

Wrong thrice.

us4...@aol.com

unread,
Nov 5, 2012, 5:51:48 PM11/5/12
to
Uirgil <uir...@uirgil.ur> wrote in message
<uirgil-F156AD....@BIGNEWS.USENETMONSTER.COM>
Subject: "Re: Virgil having one of those "bad days"" :
Ok. They were apes.

Right?

u4z

Uirgil

unread,
Nov 5, 2012, 6:08:46 PM11/5/12
to
In article <tmgg98t4vme2magc9...@4ax.com>,
The number of generations between my parents and apes is on the rough
order of a million.

And it is only those with no facts supporting their claims who are
reduced to ad hominem fallacies, as you have been.

In fact, your resort to ad hominem fallacies reveals the falsehood of
you position.

Brian E. Clark

unread,
Nov 5, 2012, 6:24:28 PM11/5/12
to
In article <tmgg98t4vme2magc9...@4ax.com>,
us4...@aol.com says...

> >Wrong thrice.
>
> Ok. They were apes.
> Right?

Any ape ancestor of Virgil would also have been an ancestor
of you, and of me, and of every other human being alive
today. That's how the biology works out.

Now, no one expects that you would have learned this in the
course of your "education" -- meaning, Sunday morning
lectures in a dank church basement, conducted by a high
school dropout whose A/V resources consisted of a kazoo and
a set of cardboard cartoons cutouts stuck to a flannel
backing board.

But in light of the fact that so much useful information is
available on the internet these days, next time couldn't
you spend at least ten or fifteen minutes to skim the
basics of a subject *before* you propound its would-be
deficiencies?

--
-----------
Brian E. Clark

Christopher A. Lee

unread,
Nov 5, 2012, 6:26:42 PM11/5/12
to
On Mon, 5 Nov 2012 18:24:28 -0500, Brian E. Clark
<brian...@newsgroup.reply.only> wrote:

>In article <tmgg98t4vme2magc9...@4ax.com>,
>us4...@aol.com says...
>
>> >Wrong thrice.
>>
>> Ok. They were apes.
>> Right?
>
>Any ape ancestor of Virgil would also have been an ancestor
>of you, and of me, and of every other human being alive
>today. That's how the biology works out.

Actually, we _are_ apes.

You can't draw up an ancestral tree that includes all the other apes
but includes man.

Because the man/(ancestral chimpanzee/bonobo) split was more recent
than the ancestral than the split between that common ancestor and the
ancestral ape species.

>Now, no one expects that you would have learned this in the
>course of your "education" -- meaning, Sunday morning
>lectures in a dank church basement, conducted by a high
>school dropout whose A/V resources consisted of a kazoo and
>a set of cardboard cartoons cutouts stuck to a flannel
>backing board.

They avoid education, especially when it contradicts their fairy
stories.

>But in light of the fact that so much useful information is
>available on the internet these days, next time couldn't
>you spend at least ten or fifteen minutes to skim the
>basics of a subject *before* you propound its would-be
>deficiencies?

They can't - because they can't cope with anything that contradicts
their beliefs.

linuxgal

unread,
Nov 5, 2012, 8:57:17 PM11/5/12
to
Uirgil wrote:

> The number of generations between my parents and apes is on the rough
> order of a million.

Actually, it's zero. You're an ape. So am I.

Tom McDonald

unread,
Nov 5, 2012, 9:00:43 PM11/5/12
to
On 11/5/2012 7:57 PM, linuxgal wrote:
> Uirgil wrote:
>
>> The number of generations between my parents and apes is on the rough
>> order of a million.
>
> Actually, it's zero. You're an ape. So am I.
>
Personally, I'm a fish. To be precise (since I speak English), I'm a
ghoti. :-)

linuxgal

unread,
Nov 5, 2012, 9:24:01 PM11/5/12
to
Bite the wax tadpole.

Brian E. Clark

unread,
Nov 5, 2012, 9:36:13 PM11/5/12
to
In article <3c_ls.7293$J_3....@newsfe07.iad>,
kil...@gmail.com says...

> > Actually, it's zero. You're an ape. So am I.
> >
> Personally, I'm a fish. To be precise (since I speak English), I'm a
> ghoti. :-)

Are you Shaw about that?

Don Martin

unread,
Nov 6, 2012, 12:59:47 PM11/6/12
to
Ready when you are, G.B.

--
aa #2278 Never mind "proof." Where is your evidence?
BAAWA Chief Assistant to the Assistant Chief Heckler
Fidei defensor (Hon. Antipodean)
The Squeeky Wheel: http://home.comcast.net/~drdonmartin/

us4...@aol.com

unread,
Nov 6, 2012, 8:05:16 PM11/6/12
to
Uirgil <uir...@uirgil.ur> wrote in message
<uirgil-CB7A93....@BIGNEWS.USENETMONSTER.COM>
Subject: "Re: US4SIN having one of those "bad days"" :

>The number of generations between my parents and apes is on the rough
>order of a million

You are making crap up. With no sources to back up your crap.

Yeah... another one of those days.

http://youtu.be/2hgGj8kbuRk

u4z

us4...@aol.com

unread,
Nov 7, 2012, 6:54:31 PM11/7/12
to
Brian E. Clark <brian...@newsgroup.reply.only> wrote in message
<MPG.2b0214b43...@news.eternal-september.org>
Subject: "Re: Virgil having one of those "bad days"" :

>In article <tmgg98t4vme2magc9...@4ax.com>,
>us4...@aol.com says...
>
>> >Wrong thrice.
>>
>> Ok. They were apes.
>> Right?
>
>Any ape ancestor of Virgil would also have been an ancestor
>of you, and of me, and of every other human being alive
>today. That's how the biology works out.

Ummm... no.

Humans were created by God in the image of God.

Biology does not\ cannot address these things.

You are however, free to express your opinion. It would be perhaps better
for you if you provided some sources showing what you have based your
opinion on.

Fo all I know, you may have had a wet dream last night.

u4z

Jeanne Douglas

unread,
Nov 7, 2012, 8:29:53 PM11/7/12
to
In article <0tsl989iolr11rc5n...@4ax.com>,
us4...@aol.com wrote:

> Brian E. Clark <brian...@newsgroup.reply.only> wrote in message
> <MPG.2b0214b43...@news.eternal-september.org>
> Subject: "Re: Virgil having one of those "bad days"" :
>
> >In article <tmgg98t4vme2magc9...@4ax.com>,
> >us4...@aol.com says...
> >
> >> >Wrong thrice.
> >>
> >> Ok. They were apes.
> >> Right?
> >
> >Any ape ancestor of Virgil would also have been an ancestor
> >of you, and of me, and of every other human being alive
> >today. That's how the biology works out.
>
> Ummm... no.
>
> Humans were created by God in the image of God.

Still waiting for that evidence that this god of yours exists.
0 new messages