>>>> >>>>>> Actually for most of Bush's tenure the Republicans
>>>> >>>>>> controlled the House, the Senate, the White House AND
>>>> >>>>>> the Supreme Court.
>>>> >>>>> And there were a lot fewer unemployed and my health care was
>>>> >>>>> the envy of the modern world.
>>>> >>>> Unemployment went UP during the Bush term.
>>>> >>>>> And we hadn't had any ambassadors murdered.
>>>> >>>> Just thousands of other Americans killed.
>>>> >>>> Americans killed by Islamic terrorists under Clinton - 93
>>>> >>>> Americans killed by Islamic terrorists under Bush - 5,098
>>>> >> Proud of that, are you?
>>>> > You ain't seen nothing yet, chuckles.
>>>> Good point.
>>>> Why are conservatives never happy unless thousands
>>>> of American troops are getting killed in overseas wars?
>>>Because conservatives rejoice in the profits that come from pursueing
>>>wars.
>> Which is why Obama is still pursueing [sic] wars, because he's a
>> conservative, right?
> How many wars has Obama started, again?
How many does he have to start? He's the reson the ME is in turmoil. They see him as a coward.
>>>>>>> >>>>>> Actually for most of Bush's tenure the Republicans
>>>>>>> >>>>>> controlled the House, the Senate, the White House AND
>>>>>>> >>>>>> the Supreme Court.
>>>>>>> >>>>> And there were a lot fewer unemployed and my health care was
>>>>>>> >>>>> the envy of the modern world.
>>>>>>> >>>> Unemployment went UP during the Bush term.
>>>>>>> >>>>> And we hadn't had any ambassadors murdered.
>>>>>>> >>>> Just thousands of other Americans killed.
>>>>>>> >>>> Americans killed by Islamic terrorists under Clinton - 93
>>>>>>> >>>> Americans killed by Islamic terrorists under Bush - 5,098
>>>>>>> >> Proud of that, are you?
>>>>>>> > You ain't seen nothing yet, chuckles.
>>>>>>> Good point.
>>>>>>> Why are conservatives never happy unless thousands
>>>>>>> of American troops are getting killed in overseas wars?
>>>>>>Because conservatives rejoice in the profits that come from pursueing
>>>>>>wars.
>>>>> Which is why Obama is still pursueing [sic] wars, because he's a
>>>>> conservative, right?
>>>> How many wars has Obama started, again?
>>> You know the difference between 'starting' and 'pursuing,' right?
>>> So why is Obama pursuing wars?
>>> Is he a conservative?
>> Of course he is a conservative. Bush's
>> bailouts, Bush's wars, Bush's Cuba policy,
>> Bush's secret trials policy, even appointing
>> Bush's people (Patraeus, Perino, Gates).
>> He is merely marginally less conservative
>> than Bush.
> He's a good conservative in the Ronald Reagan vein.
Can you imagine the rightwing reaction if Reagan tried to run for office in today's GOP?
"I support the Brady Bill and I urge the Congress
to enact it without further delay." Ronald Reagan, 3/28/91
"I believe in the idea of amnesty for those who have put down roots and lived here, even though sometime back they may have entered illegally"
Ronald Reagan, granting amnesty to illegals, 1986
>>>>> >>>>>> Actually for most of Bush's tenure the Republicans
>>>>> >>>>>> controlled the House, the Senate, the White House AND
>>>>> >>>>>> the Supreme Court.
>>>>> >>>>> And there were a lot fewer unemployed and my health care was
>>>>> >>>>> the envy of the modern world.
>>>>> >>>> Unemployment went UP during the Bush term.
>>>>> >>>>> And we hadn't had any ambassadors murdered.
>>>>> >>>> Just thousands of other Americans killed.
>>>>> >>>> Americans killed by Islamic terrorists under Clinton - 93
>>>>> >>>> Americans killed by Islamic terrorists under Bush - 5,098
>>>>> >> Proud of that, are you?
>>>>> > You ain't seen nothing yet, chuckles.
>>>>> Good point.
>>>>> Why are conservatives never happy unless thousands
>>>>> of American troops are getting killed in overseas wars?
>>>>Because conservatives rejoice in the profits that come from
>>>>pursueing wars.
>>> Which is why Obama is still pursueing [sic] wars, because he's a
>>> conservative, right?
>> How many wars has Obama started, again?
> How many does he have to start? He's the reson the ME is in turmoil.
> They see him as a coward.
If it weren't for Obama Kaddafi would still be alive and conservatives would be demanding
that Obama "do something" about it.
>> >> >>>>>> Actually for most of Bush's tenure the Republicans
>> >> >>>>>> controlled the House, the Senate, the White House AND
>> >> >>>>>> the Supreme Court.
>> >> >>>>> And there were a lot fewer unemployed and my health care was the
>> >> >>>>> envy of the modern world.
>> >> >>>> Unemployment went UP during the Bush term.
>> >> >>>>> And we hadn't had any ambassadors murdered.
>> >> >>>> Just thousands of other Americans killed.
>> >> >>>> Americans killed by Islamic terrorists under Clinton - 93
>> >> >>>> Americans killed by Islamic terrorists under Bush - 5,098
>> >> >> Proud of that, are you?
>> >> > You ain't seen nothing yet, chuckles.
>> >> Good point.
>> >> Why are conservatives never happy unless thousands
>> >> of American troops are getting killed in overseas wars?
>> >Because conservatives rejoice in the profits that come from pursueing
>> >wars.
>> Which is why Obama is still pursueing [sic] wars, because he's a
>> conservative, right?
> President Obama is trying to avoid wars.
Really? Is that why he unilaterally decided to have our military invade a foreign country WITHOUT Congressional authorization or even approval?
Because he's trying to avoid wars?
Seems to me that's the sort of thing that starts a war.
>>> >> >>>>>> Actually for most of Bush's tenure the Republicans
>>> >> >>>>>> controlled the House, the Senate, the White House AND
>>> >> >>>>>> the Supreme Court.
>>> >> >>>>> And there were a lot fewer unemployed and my health care
>>> >> >>>>> was the envy of the modern world.
>>> >> >>>> Unemployment went UP during the Bush term.
>>> >> >>>>> And we hadn't had any ambassadors murdered.
>>> >> >>>> Just thousands of other Americans killed.
>>> >> >>>> Americans killed by Islamic terrorists under Clinton - 93
>>> >> >>>> Americans killed by Islamic terrorists under Bush - 5,098
>>> >> >> Proud of that, are you?
>>> >> > You ain't seen nothing yet, chuckles.
>>> >> Good point.
>>> >> Why are conservatives never happy unless thousands
>>> >> of American troops are getting killed in overseas wars?
>>> >Because conservatives rejoice in the profits that come from
>>> >pursueing wars.
>>> Which is why Obama is still pursueing [sic] wars, because he's a
>>> conservative, right?
>> President Obama is trying to avoid wars.
> Really? Is that why he unilaterally decided to have our military
> invade a foreign country WITHOUT Congressional authorization or even
> approval?
You mean like when Reagan invaded Greneda, or more like when Bush invaded Panama?
>Mitchell Holman <nomailverizon.net> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>"Scout" <me4g...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in
>news:k87tf7$uok$1@dont-email.me:
>> Really? Is that why he unilaterally decided to have our military
>> invade a foreign country WITHOUT Congressional authorization or even
>> approval?
> You mean like when Reagan invaded Greneda, >or more like when Bush invaded Panama?
Yep. JUST like that.
So you admit Obama is like Reagan and Bush and does NOT avoid wars.
>>>> >> >>>>>> Actually for most of Bush's tenure the Republicans
>>>> >> >>>>>> controlled the House, the Senate, the White House AND
>>>> >> >>>>>> the Supreme Court.
>>>> >> >>>>> And there were a lot fewer unemployed and my health care
>>>> >> >>>>> was the envy of the modern world.
>>>> >> >>>> Unemployment went UP during the Bush term.
>>>> >> >>>>> And we hadn't had any ambassadors murdered.
>>>> >> >>>> Just thousands of other Americans killed.
>>>> >> >>>> Americans killed by Islamic terrorists under Clinton - 93
>>>> >> >>>> Americans killed by Islamic terrorists under Bush - 5,098
>>>> >> >> Proud of that, are you?
>>>> >> > You ain't seen nothing yet, chuckles.
>>>> >> Good point.
>>>> >> Why are conservatives never happy unless thousands
>>>> >> of American troops are getting killed in overseas wars?
>>>> >Because conservatives rejoice in the profits that come from
>>>> >pursueing wars.
>>>> Which is why Obama is still pursueing [sic] wars, because he's a
>>>> conservative, right?
>>> President Obama is trying to avoid wars.
>> Really? Is that why he unilaterally decided to have our military
>> invade a foreign country WITHOUT Congressional authorization or even
>> approval?
> You mean like when Reagan invaded Greneda,
> or more like when Bush invaded Panama?
Exactly.
They all acted improperly and without following the proper Constitutional steps.
So how was Obama trying to avoid wars, when his actions were the opposite?
>>> Really? Is that why he unilaterally decided to have our military
>>> invade a foreign country WITHOUT Congressional authorization or even
>>> approval?
>> You mean like when Reagan invaded Greneda, >>or more like when Bush invaded Panama?
> Yep. JUST like that.
> So you admit Obama is like Reagan and Bush and does NOT avoid wars.
Obama is like Reagan and Bush in LOTS of areas.
Is that news?
December 17, 2010 Obama Signs Bill To Extend Bush Tax Cuts
10-25-2011
Obama Follows Bush Timetable to Get Out of Iraq.
30 September 2011
Obama administration seeks first death penalty via military tribunal at Guant namo
05/5/11 Obama's Sudden Assault on Medical Marijuana
10/24/2011
Obama Appoints Monsanto Kingpin Michael Taylor as the United States FDA Food Safety Czar
1/28/09
Obama Appoints Goldman Sachs Lobbyist to Top Treas. Post
1/17/2011
In the Pockets of Banks:Obama Appoints JP Morgan Banker to Chief of Staff
>>>>> >> >>>>>> Actually for most of Bush's tenure the Republicans
>>>>> >> >>>>>> controlled the House, the Senate, the White House AND
>>>>> >> >>>>>> the Supreme Court.
>>>>> >> >>>>> And there were a lot fewer unemployed and my health care
>>>>> >> >>>>> was the envy of the modern world.
>>>>> >> >>>> Unemployment went UP during the Bush term.
>>>>> >> >>>>> And we hadn't had any ambassadors murdered.
>>>>> >> >>>> Just thousands of other Americans killed.
>>>>> >> >>>> Americans killed by Islamic terrorists under Clinton - 93
>>>>> >> >>>> Americans killed by Islamic terrorists under Bush - 5,098
>>>>> >> >> Proud of that, are you?
>>>>> >> > You ain't seen nothing yet, chuckles.
>>>>> >> Good point.
>>>>> >> Why are conservatives never happy unless thousands
>>>>> >> of American troops are getting killed in overseas wars?
>>>>> >Because conservatives rejoice in the profits that come from
>>>>> >pursueing wars.
>>>>> Which is why Obama is still pursueing [sic] wars, because he's a
>>>>> conservative, right?
>>>> President Obama is trying to avoid wars.
>>> Really? Is that why he unilaterally decided to have our military
>>> invade a foreign country WITHOUT Congressional authorization or even
>>> approval?
>> You mean like when Reagan invaded Greneda,
>> or more like when Bush invaded Panama?
> Exactly.
> They all acted improperly and without following the proper
> Constitutional steps.
>>>>>> >> >>>>>> Actually for most of Bush's tenure the Republicans
>>>>>> >> >>>>>> controlled the House, the Senate, the White House AND
>>>>>> >> >>>>>> the Supreme Court.
>>>>>> >> >>>>> And there were a lot fewer unemployed and my health care
>>>>>> >> >>>>> was the envy of the modern world.
>>>>>> >> >>>> Unemployment went UP during the Bush term.
>>>>>> >> >>>>> And we hadn't had any ambassadors murdered.
>>>>>> >> >>>> Just thousands of other Americans killed.
>>>>>> >> >>>> Americans killed by Islamic terrorists under Clinton - 93
>>>>>> >> >>>> Americans killed by Islamic terrorists under Bush - 5,098
>>>>>> >> >> Proud of that, are you?
>>>>>> >> > You ain't seen nothing yet, chuckles.
>>>>>> >> Good point.
>>>>>> >> Why are conservatives never happy unless thousands
>>>>>> >> of American troops are getting killed in overseas wars?
>>>>>> >Because conservatives rejoice in the profits that come from
>>>>>> >pursueing wars.
>>>>>> Which is why Obama is still pursueing [sic] wars, because he's a
>>>>>> conservative, right?
>>>>> President Obama is trying to avoid wars.
>>>> Really? Is that why he unilaterally decided to have our military
>>>> invade a foreign country WITHOUT Congressional authorization or even
>>>> approval?
>>> You mean like when Reagan invaded Greneda,
>>> or more like when Bush invaded Panama?
>> Exactly.
>> They all acted improperly and without following the proper
>> Constitutional steps.
> You have never heard of the War Powers Act?
> Pity. It has been the law for the last 39 years.
"The President in every possible instance shall consult with Congress before introducing United States Armed Forces into hostilities or into situation where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances, and after every such introduction shall consult regularly with the Congress until United States Armed Forces are no longer engaged in hostilities or have been removed from such situations. "
>> >> >> >>>>>> Actually for most of Bush's tenure the Republicans
>> >> >> >>>>>> controlled the House, the Senate, the White House AND
>> >> >> >>>>>> the Supreme Court.
>> >> >> >>>>> And there were a lot fewer unemployed and my health care was
>> >> >> >the
>> >> >> >>>>> envy of the modern world.
>> >> >> >>>> Unemployment went UP during the Bush term.
>> >> >> >>>>> And we hadn't had any ambassadors murdered.
>> >> >> >>>> Just thousands of other Americans killed.
>> >> >> >>>> Americans killed by Islamic terrorists under Clinton - 93
>> >> >> >>>> Americans killed by Islamic terrorists under Bush - 5,098
>> >> >> >> Proud of that, are you?
>> >> >> > You ain't seen nothing yet, chuckles.
>> >> >> Good point.
>> >> >> Why are conservatives never happy unless thousands
>> >> >> of American troops are getting killed in overseas wars?
>> >> >Because conservatives rejoice in the profits that come from pursueing
>> >> >wars.
>> >> Which is why Obama is still pursueing [sic] wars, because he's a
>> >> conservative, right?
>> > President Obama is trying to avoid wars.
>> Really? Is that why he unilaterally decided to have our military invade a
>> foreign country WITHOUT Congressional authorization or even approval?
>> Because he's trying to avoid wars?
>> Seems to me that's the sort of thing that starts a war.
> Has it started a war?
When the military forces of one nation attack another, it is by definition WAR.
War - a period of armed conflict.
We attacked them with our forces...they fought back.
>>>> Really? Is that why he unilaterally decided to have our military
>>>> invade a foreign country WITHOUT Congressional authorization or even
>>>> approval?
>>> You mean like when Reagan invaded Greneda, >>>or more like when Bush invaded Panama?
>> Yep. JUST like that.
>> So you admit Obama is like Reagan and Bush and does NOT avoid wars.
> Obama is like Reagan and Bush in LOTS of areas.
> Is that news?
Not to me.
It is to some people in this newsgroup, though.
Just enjoy seeing the confirmation every once in a while.
>> >> >> >>>>>> Actually for most of Bush's tenure the Republicans
>> >> >> >>>>>> controlled the House, the Senate, the White House AND
>> >> >> >>>>>> the Supreme Court.
>> >> >> >>>>> And there were a lot fewer unemployed and my health care was
>> >> >> >the
>> >> >> >>>>> envy of the modern world.
>> >> >> >>>> Unemployment went UP during the Bush term.
>> >> >> >>>>> And we hadn't had any ambassadors murdered.
>> >> >> >>>> Just thousands of other Americans killed.
>> >> >> >>>> Americans killed by Islamic terrorists under Clinton - 93
>> >> >> >>>> Americans killed by Islamic terrorists under Bush - 5,098
>> >> >> >> Proud of that, are you?
>> >> >> > You ain't seen nothing yet, chuckles.
>> >> >> Good point.
>> >> >> Why are conservatives never happy unless thousands
>> >> >> of American troops are getting killed in overseas wars?
>> >> >Because conservatives rejoice in the profits that come from pursueing
>> >> >wars.
>> >> Which is why Obama is still pursueing [sic] wars, because he's a
>> >> conservative, right?
>> >President Obama is trying to avoid wars.
>> ROFLMAO
>> Is that what they're telling you to say?
>Face it. You just plain don't like the United States of America and don't
>care to back the country that allows you to live here. You're a disgrace to
>Americans. It would be better if you just go somewhere else if you hate
>America as much as you obviously do. You have nothing good to say about the
>country and you constantly bad-mouth everything this country does if it
>isn't done by a Republican. You are part of problem because you refuse to be
>part of the solution. That is exactly why we call Republicans losers.
I'm not a Republican, you idiot.
Nice rant, though.
It momentarily diverted attention away from Obama's fascination with
war.
>>>>>>> >> >>>>>> Actually for most of Bush's tenure the Republicans
>>>>>>> >> >>>>>> controlled the House, the Senate, the White House AND
>>>>>>> >> >>>>>> the Supreme Court.
>>>>>>> >> >>>>> And there were a lot fewer unemployed and my health care
>>>>>>> >> >>>>> was the envy of the modern world.
>>>>>>> >> >>>> Unemployment went UP during the Bush term.
>>>>>>> >> >>>>> And we hadn't had any ambassadors murdered.
>>>>>>> >> >>>> Just thousands of other Americans killed.
>>>>>>> >> >>>> Americans killed by Islamic terrorists under Clinton - 93
>>>>>>> >> >>>> Americans killed by Islamic terrorists under Bush - 5,098
>>>>>>> >> >> Proud of that, are you?
>>>>>>> >> > You ain't seen nothing yet, chuckles.
>>>>>>> >> Good point.
>>>>>>> >> Why are conservatives never happy unless thousands
>>>>>>> >> of American troops are getting killed in overseas wars?
>>>>>>> >Because conservatives rejoice in the profits that come from
>>>>>>> >pursueing wars.
>>>>>>> Which is why Obama is still pursueing [sic] wars, because he's a
>>>>>>> conservative, right?
>>>>>> President Obama is trying to avoid wars.
>>>>> Really? Is that why he unilaterally decided to have our military
>>>>> invade a foreign country WITHOUT Congressional authorization or even
>>>>> approval?
>>>> You mean like when Reagan invaded Greneda,
>>>> or more like when Bush invaded Panama?
>>> Exactly.
>>> They all acted improperly and without following the proper
>>> Constitutional steps.
>> You have never heard of the War Powers Act?
>> Pity. It has been the law for the last 39 years.
>"The President in every possible instance shall consult with Congress before >introducing United States Armed Forces into hostilities or into situation >where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the >circumstances, and after every such introduction shall consult regularly >with the Congress until United States Armed Forces are no longer engaged in >hostilities or have been removed from such situations. "
>I fail to see how it changes anything.
>If anything it simply compounds their error.
Well, I guess it could be that Obama *is* trying to avoid war because
it's not, technically, a "war." Congress didn't declare war, and Obama
just invades countries momentarily.
So Obama really just likes "Momentary Invasions," not war.
>>>>> Really? Is that why he unilaterally decided to have our military
>>>>> invade a foreign country WITHOUT Congressional authorization or even
>>>>> approval?
>>>> You mean like when Reagan invaded Greneda, >>>>or more like when Bush invaded Panama?
>>> Yep. JUST like that.
>>> So you admit Obama is like Reagan and Bush and does NOT avoid wars.
>> Obama is like Reagan and Bush in LOTS of areas.
>> Is that news?
> Not to me.
> It is to some people in this newsgroup, though.
So much for the rightwing rant about our "socialist" president and his "radical liberal agenda".
>>>>>> Really? Is that why he unilaterally decided to have our military
>>>>>> invade a foreign country WITHOUT Congressional authorization or >even
>>>>>> approval?
>>>>> You mean like when Reagan invaded Greneda, >>>>>or more like when Bush invaded Panama?
>>>> Yep. JUST like that.
>>>> So you admit Obama is like Reagan and Bush and does NOT avoid wars.
>>> Obama is like Reagan and Bush in LOTS of areas.
>>> Is that news?
>> Not to me.
>> It is to some people in this newsgroup, though.
> So much for the rightwing rant about our >"socialist" president and his "radical liberal >agenda".
> Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.......
Left wingers also refer to Obama as a "socialist."
>>>>>>>>> Actually for most of Bush's tenure the Republicans
>>>>>>>>> controlled the House, the Senate, the White House AND
>>>>>>>>> the Supreme Court.
>>>>>>>> And there were a lot fewer unemployed and my health care was the
>>>>>>>> envy of the modern world.
>>>>>>> Unemployment went UP during the Bush term.
>>>>> Can you imagine the rightwing shitstorm
>>>>> if Obama DOUBLED the unemployment rate?
>>>>> But Bush does it - no problem.
>>>> Do you often have that much trouble reading data? Bush ranged from >> 4.6 >>>> to 6.0 in 2003 but it came right back down to 4.6 and was at 5.8 in >> his >>>> last year.
>> >>>>>>>> Actually for most of Bush's tenure the Republicans
>> >>>>>>>> controlled the House, the Senate, the White House AND
>> >>>>>>>> the Supreme Court.
>> >>>>>>> And there were a lot fewer unemployed and my health care was the
>> >>>>>>> envy of the modern world.
>> >>>>>> Unemployment went UP during the Bush term.
>> >>>> Can you imagine the rightwing shitstorm
>> >>>> if Obama DOUBLED the unemployment rate?
>> >>>> But Bush does it - no problem.
>> >>> Do you often have that much trouble reading data? Bush ranged from >> > 4.6 >> >>> to 6.0 in 2003 but it came right back down to 4.6 and was at 5.8 in >> > his >> >>> last year.
>>>>>>> Actually for most of Bush's tenure the Republicans
>>>>>>> controlled the House, the Senate, the White House AND
>>>>>>> the Supreme Court.
>>>>>> And there were a lot fewer unemployed and my health care was the envy
>> of
>>>>>> the modern world.
>>>>>> And we hadn't had any ambassadors murdered.
>>>>> But we had 9/11. Let me guess: you're going to blame that one on
>> Willie.
>>>> Pretty much. Democrats are a death cult. So die and leave us out of it.
>>> My, how "christian" of you.
>> My christianity has nothing to do with your membership in a death cult.
> I'm not a Democrat.
Well, you certainly seemd quite comfortable telling me what I was. Nevertheless, membership in the death cult is not confined to Democrats. It does include the glassy eyed zombies that think like Democrats but also think thy are smarter than everyone else.
-- Refusenik #1
Libs suffer from Eleutherophobia. And there is no cure.
Obama called the SEALs and THEY got bin Laden. When the SEALs called Obama, THEY GOT DENIED. Fuck Obama
> >>>>>>> Actually for most of Bush's tenure the Republicans
> >>>>>>> controlled the House, the Senate, the White House AND
> >>>>>>> the Supreme Court.
> >>>>>> And there were a lot fewer unemployed and my health care was the
> envy
> >> of
> >>>>>> the modern world.
> >>>>>> And we hadn't had any ambassadors murdered.
> >>>>> But we had 9/11. Let me guess: you're going to blame that one on
> >> Willie.
> >>>> Pretty much. Democrats are a death cult. So die and leave us out of
> it.
> >>> My, how "christian" of you.
> >> My christianity has nothing to do with your membership in a death cult.
> > I'm not a Democrat.
> Well, you certainly seemd quite comfortable telling me what I was.
>Nevertheless, membership in the death cult is not confined to
Democrats. It
> does include the glassy eyed zombies that think like Democrats but also
> think thy are smarter than everyone else.
Thinking you're smarter than everyone else is good.
>>>>>>>> Actually for most of Bush's tenure the Republicans
>>>>>>>> controlled the House, the Senate, the White House AND
>>>>>>>> the Supreme Court.
>>>>>>> And there were a lot fewer unemployed and my health care was the
> envy
>>> of
>>>>>>> the modern world.
>>>>>>> And we hadn't had any ambassadors murdered.
>>>>>> But we had 9/11. Let me guess: you're going to blame that one on
>>> Willie.
>>>>> Pretty much. Democrats are a death cult. So die and leave us out of
> it.
>>>> My, how "christian" of you.
>>> My christianity has nothing to do with your membership in a death cult.
>> I'm not a Democrat.
> Well, you certainly seemd quite comfortable telling me what I was.
> Nevertheless, membership in the death cult is not confined to Democrats. > It
> does include the glassy eyed zombies that think like Democrats but also
> think thy are smarter than everyone else.
I don't think like Democrats. I own guns, to protect myself from wingnuts such as yourself.
