Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Why Does America Have So Many "Peter Pan" (Peeder Pansy) Men?
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  14 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Dress Wearing Sissy  
View profile  
 More options Apr 23 2012, 5:24 pm
Newsgroups: alt.politics.homosexuality, alt.journalism.gay-press, soc.women, rec.arts.tv, alt.atheism
From: Dress Wearing Sissy <inva...@not-for-mail.invalid>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 21:24:22 +0000 (UTC)
Local: Mon, Apr 23 2012 5:24 pm
Subject: Why Does America Have So Many "Peter Pan" (Peeder Pansy) Men?
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2011/10/07/why-does-america-have-
so-many-peter-pan-men/?intcmp=obnetwork

Working in an office full of women, many of whom are young,
single gals, I hear all the time, “Where are all the good men
out there?” Even in this post-feminist age of asserting
independence from men and having both a career and a family,
women still want their prince and these days, he can be really
tough to find.

Bill Bennett, who used to work for President George H. W. Bush
and is now at the Claremont Institute, just came out with a new
book called, "The Book of Man: Readings on the Path to Manhood,"
and it could not have been released at a better time.

Bennett writes about how the culture has so badly confused males
in what their role in life should be that they just never grow
up – or man up for that matter. They have fallen behind in
college where women now surpass men in getting their college
degrees. These women are getting jobs in the workforce while the
men are lingering in dead-end jobs -- if they are working at
all. While opportunity for women is a good thing, men should not
take this as a cue to coast.

And don’t even get me started on the maturity level of these
Peter Pan-like boys. The statistic from Bennett’s book that
perhaps struck me the most is that teenage boys, ages 12-to-17
years old, actually spend less time playing video games than 18-
to-34-year-old men. I can understand the desire to play a video
game here and there as a kid, but as an adult? Grow up.

These men should be studying in college, getting a job, and
contributing to society through the workforce and family. How in
the world do they have time to play video games for hours? The
answer is that they just don’t ever grow up.

But are women contributing to the demise of the man? Feminism
has been detrimental to the identity of the American male. Men
have been rebuked if they pull out a chair or open a door for a
woman. If they offer to pay for dinner (which they should),
their date may be offended and demand to split the check because
she can pay her own way. -- Ladies, it’s not such a bad thing to
be treated to dinner unless that meal comes with sexual
expectations, which is another column.

Yes, men should man up, take on the responsibilities of an
adult, get a job, have a family and be a contributing member to
society. The benefits to being a married man are huge. According
to Men’s Health magazine, married men make more money, have more
sex, get promoted faster, and are generally healthier than
unmarried men.

But women also need to let men be men. Men don’t have to linger
between college and well, college, forever. They can make
choices to take control of their lives and be the men they are
called to be if they just put down the game controls and choose
a better direction. Sadly, at the moment, American women are
apparently still in need of a few good men.

Liberalism has taught men that a dick up the ass and one in
their mouth is all they need.  They have no use for women.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
John Baker  
View profile  
 More options Apr 23 2012, 7:16 pm
Newsgroups: alt.politics.homosexuality, alt.journalism.gay-press, soc.women, rec.arts.tv, alt.atheism
From: John Baker <nu...@bizniz.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 19:16:22 -0400
Local: Mon, Apr 23 2012 7:16 pm
Subject: Re: Why Does America Have So Many "Peter Pan" (Peeder Pansy) Men?
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 21:24:22 +0000 (UTC), Dress Wearing Sissy

<inva...@not-for-mail.invalid> wrote:

>Liberalism has taught men that a dick up the ass and one in
>their mouth is all they need.  They have no use for women.

Then why is it almost always conservatives who are getting busted for
soliciting gay sex .. often with underaged partners?

Stupid asshole.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Calvin Ramsey  
View profile  
 More options Apr 23 2012, 7:21 pm
Newsgroups: alt.atheism
From: Calvin Ramsey <calram...@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 19:21:44 -0400
Local: Mon, Apr 23 2012 7:21 pm
Subject: Re: Why Does America Have So Many "Peter Pan" (Peeder Pansy) Men?
On 4/23/2012 7:16 PM, John Baker wrote:

> On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 21:24:22 +0000 (UTC), Dress Wearing Sissy
> <inva...@not-for-mail.invalid>  wrote:

>> Liberalism has taught men that a dick up the ass and one in
>> their mouth is all they need.  They have no use for women.

> Then why is it almost always conservatives who are getting busted for
> soliciting gay sex .. often with underaged partners?

Let me guess: Because Liberal faggots won't snitch on other Liberal faggots.

How much did I win?


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
wolfagain  
View profile  
 More options Apr 23 2012, 7:25 pm
Newsgroups: alt.politics.homosexuality, alt.journalism.gay-press, soc.women, rec.arts.tv, alt.atheism
From: wolfagain <w...@provide.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 16:25:36 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Mon, Apr 23 2012 7:25 pm
Subject: Re: Why Does America Have So Many "Peter Pan" (Peeder Pansy) Men?
On Apr 23, 6:16 pm, John Baker <nu...@bizniz.net> wrote:

> On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 21:24:22 +0000 (UTC), Dress Wearing Sissy

> <inva...@not-for-mail.invalid> wrote:

> >Liberalism has taught men that a dick up the ass and one in
> >their mouth is all they need.  They have no use for women.

> Then why is it almost always conservatives who are getting busted for
> soliciting gay sex .. often with underaged partners?

> Stupid asshole.

above poster Baker is a known homosexual who frequents many homo
newsgroups and atheist groups where he(she?) is welcomed by his? own
kind. just click on his profile! probably still lives with his-her
mother.

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Don Martin  
View profile  
 More options Apr 23 2012, 9:12 pm
Newsgroups: alt.atheism
From: Don Martin <drdonmar...@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 21:12:07 -0400
Local: Mon, Apr 23 2012 9:12 pm
Subject: Re: Why Does America Have So Many "Peter Pan" (Peeder Pansy) Men?

On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 16:25:36 -0700 (PDT), wolfagain <w...@provide.net> wrote:
>above poster Xxxxx is a known homosexual who frequents many homo
>newsgroups and atheist groups where he(she?) is welcomed by his? own
>kind. just click on his profile! probably still lives with his-her
>mother.

Above stupid asshole is an anonymous poster lacking the guts to show either his
name or his face in public.  

Suits him, actually.

--

aa #2278 Never mind "proof." Where is your evidence?
BAAWA Chief Assistant to the Assistant Chief Heckler
            Fidei defensor (Hon. Antipodean)
The Squeeky Wheel:  http://home.comcast.net/~drdonmartin/


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Syd M.  
View profile  
 More options Apr 23 2012, 8:14 pm
Newsgroups: alt.atheism
From: "Syd M." <pauldavidwri...@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 17:14:14 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Mon, Apr 23 2012 8:14 pm
Subject: Re: Why Does America Have So Many "Peter Pan" (Peeder Pansy) Men?
On Apr 23, 7:21 pm, Calvin Ramsey <calram...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> On 4/23/2012 7:16 PM, John Baker wrote:

> > On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 21:24:22 +0000 (UTC), Dress Wearing Sissy
> > <inva...@not-for-mail.invalid>  wrote:

> >> Liberalism has taught men that a dick up the ass and one in
> >> their mouth is all they need.  They have no use for women.

> > Then why is it almost always conservatives who are getting busted for
> > soliciting gay sex .. often with underaged partners?

> Let me guess: Because Liberal faggots won't snitch on other Liberal faggots.

> How much did I win?

Since yer absolutely wrong, nothing, loser.

PDW


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Syd M.  
View profile  
 More options Apr 23 2012, 8:15 pm
Newsgroups: alt.atheism
From: "Syd M." <pauldavidwri...@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 17:15:21 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Mon, Apr 23 2012 8:15 pm
Subject: Re: Why Does America Have So Many "Peter Pan" (Peeder Pansy) Men?
On Apr 23, 7:25 pm, wolfagain <w...@provide.net> wrote:

> On Apr 23, 6:16 pm, John Baker <nu...@bizniz.net> wrote:

> > On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 21:24:22 +0000 (UTC), Dress Wearing Sissy

> > <inva...@not-for-mail.invalid> wrote:

> > >Liberalism has taught men that a dick up the ass and one in
> > >their mouth is all they need.  They have no use for women.

> > Then why is it almost always conservatives who are getting busted for
> > soliciting gay sex .. often with underaged partners?

> > Stupid asshole.

> above poster Baker is a known homosexual

Oh, look, another rightard bigot.

PDW


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Marcus Aurelius  
View profile  
 More options Apr 23 2012, 10:20 pm
Newsgroups: alt.politics.homosexuality, alt.journalism.gay-press, soc.women, rec.arts.tv, alt.atheism
From: Marcus Aurelius <alexander...@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 19:20:25 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Mon, Apr 23 2012 10:20 pm
Subject: Re: Why Does America Have So Many "Peter Pan" (Peeder Pansy) Men?
Thank you for the original post.
Gary Cross, a Penn State University Historian, wonders: " Where have
all the men gone?"
His book, "Men to Boys: The Making of Modern Immaturity", argues that
"the culture of the boy-men today is less a life stage than a
lifestyle."
Men and women from foreign nations frequently remark disparagingly on
the emasculated
nature of American men who have been degraded out of fear, obedience,
and the shame of being men from our women, who have made us feel
guilty for just being men.
Effeminate and feminist men have become de rigeur while their
rejection of the masculine culture is welcomed, nourished,
safeguarded, and considered "politically correct" in American society
and in the eyes of the law.
Manly behavior is not.
There has been a recent uptick of books, articles and research studies
documenting an endocrinological (or hormone) decline in the general
male population. Recent analysis shows average testosterone levels
receding in men of all ages. In addition, average sperm quality,
quantity and even testicle size has seen a market reduction. Although
many theories are presented to why this is happening, from endocrine
disruptors to the feminist movement, to evolutionary biology,
researchers ultimately concede that the reason is still unknown.
For a healthy male, typical seminal fluid analysis values should be:

Volume: 2-6 ml
Density: 20-200 million/ml
Motility: greater than 60% motile

However, according to the ever-increasing literature on sperm counts,
these "normal" values are steadily decreasing and only a minute
proportion of males will have semen values in today's Western
industrialized countries. Not only are sperm counts decreasing, but
also are the average sperm volumes which contain a greater proportion
of deformed spermatozoa that have reduced motility's.
13. Travison , T. Araujo, A., O'Donnell, A. Kupelian, V. and Mckinlay,
J. (2007). " A Population-Level Decline in Serum Testosterone Levels
in American Men" (http://jcem.endojournals.org/content/
92/1/196.abstract). The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
92 (1): 196-202. doi:10.1210/jc.2006-1375 (http://dx.doi.org/
10.1210%2Fjc.2006-1375). http://jcem.endojournals.org/content/92/196.abstract.
14. Dindyal, S. (2007). " The sperm count has been decreasing steadily
for many years in Western industrialized countries: Is there an
endocrine basis for this decrease?" (http://www.ispub.com/ostia/
index.php?xmlFilePath=journals/iju/vol2n1/sperm.xml). The Internet
Journal of Urology 2 (1): 1-21. http://
www.ispub.com/ostia/index.php?xmlFilePath=journals/iju/vol2n1/sperm.xml.
Professor Niels Skakkebaeck, a Danish scientist, first alerted the
world to the possibility of a substantial fall in male fertility
levels in 1992. He did this by showing that sperm counts in health men
appeared to have dropped by more than half in 50 years. Professor
Skakkebecks's work attracted worldwide publicity at first-and then
ridicule. He and his team in the Department of Growth and Development
in Copenhagen University had reviewed 61 international studies
involving 14,947 men between 1938 and 1992. They found that the
average sperm count had fallen from 113 million per milliliter in 1940
to 66 million in 1990. Critics who reanalysed the Danish data pointed
out a fundamental flaw in the calculations which, they said, ruled out
any significant decline.
Subsequent studies have confirmed and strengthened Skakkebaek's
findings. A survey of 1,350 sperm donors in Paris found a decline in
sperm counts by around 2% each year over the past 23 years, with
younger men having the poorest-quality semen.
In another another study at the University of Helsinki led by Jarkko
Farajarinen, testicular tissued was examined at post-mortem from  528
middle-aged Finish men who died suddenly in either 1981 or 1991. Among
me who died in 1981, 56.4% had normal, healthy sperm production. By
1991, however, this figure had dropped dramatically to 26.9%. The
average weight of men's testes decreased over the decade, while the
proportion of useless fribrous testicular tissued increased.
Adamopoulos et al in Athens examined 23,850 men between 1977 to 1993
(17 years) and found similar results to Farjarinen.
In Edinburgh a recent study by Irwin saw a 25% decrease in sperm over
20 years, the results are shown in table 1 below. The worrying thing
about this downward trend is that a sperm count less than 20 million
sperms per ml is interpreted as being infertile.  If this downward
trend of counts were to continue then values less than this will be
the average in the next millennium.

Year    Average Sperms Count per ml

1950    100 million
1970     75 million
1990     50 million
Table 1:


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Tom  
View profile  
 More options Apr 23 2012, 10:44 pm
Newsgroups: alt.politics.homosexuality, alt.journalism.gay-press, soc.women, rec.arts.tv, alt.atheism
From: Tom <drso...@aol.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 19:44:58 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Mon, Apr 23 2012 10:44 pm
Subject: Re: Why Does America Have So Many "Peter Pan" (Peeder Pansy) Men?
On Apr 23, 6:25 pm, wolfagain <w...@provide.net> wrote:

> On Apr 23, 6:16 pm, John Baker <nu...@bizniz.net> wrote:

> > On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 21:24:22 +0000 (UTC), Dress Wearing Sissy

> > <inva...@not-for-mail.invalid> wrote:

> > >Liberalism has taught men that a dick up the ass and one in
> > >their mouth is all they need.  They have no use for women.

> > Then why is it almost always conservatives who are getting busted for
> > soliciting gay sex .. often with underaged partners?

> > Stupid asshole.

> above poster Baker is a known homosexual

Known to whom, wolfturd? You?

You're a waste of skin.

Tom


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
John Baker  
View profile  
 More options Apr 23 2012, 11:19 pm
Newsgroups: alt.atheism
From: John Baker <nu...@bizniz.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 23:19:13 -0400
Local: Mon, Apr 23 2012 11:19 pm
Subject: Re: Why Does America Have So Many "Peter Pan" (Peeder Pansy) Men?
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 17:14:14 -0700 (PDT), "Syd M."

<pauldavidwri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>On Apr 23, 7:21 pm, Calvin Ramsey <calram...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> On 4/23/2012 7:16 PM, John Baker wrote:

>> > On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 21:24:22 +0000 (UTC), Dress Wearing Sissy
>> > <inva...@not-for-mail.invalid>  wrote:

>> >> Liberalism has taught men that a dick up the ass and one in
>> >> their mouth is all they need.  They have no use for women.

>> > Then why is it almost always conservatives who are getting busted for
>> > soliciting gay sex .. often with underaged partners?

<PIGGYBACKING>

>> Let me guess: Because Liberal faggots won't snitch on other Liberal faggots.

>> How much did I win?

A kick in the nuts.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Tronscend  
View profile  
 More options Apr 24 2012, 2:46 pm
Newsgroups: soc.men, alt.atheism
From: "Tronscend" <tronf...@frizurf.no>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 20:46:42 +0200
Local: Tues, Apr 24 2012 2:46 pm
Subject: Re: Why Does America Have So Many "Peter Pan" (Peeder Pansy) Men?
FINALLY someone blaming men. About time.

T

"Dress Wearing Sissy" <inva...@not-for-mail.invalid> skrev i melding
news:YQ9VW75P41023.2252546296@reece.net.au...


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Sparks  
View profile  
 More options Apr 25 2012, 3:06 am
Newsgroups: alt.politics.homosexuality, alt.journalism.gay-press, soc.women, rec.arts.tv, alt.atheism
From: Sparks <spa...@aec.gov>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 03:06:04 -0400
Local: Wed, Apr 25 2012 3:06 am
Subject: Re: Why Does America Have So Many "Peter Pan" (Peeder Pansy) Men?
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 21:24:22 +0000 (UTC), Dress Wearing Sissy

<inva...@not-for-mail.invalid> wrote:
>These men should be studying in college, getting a job, and
>contributing to society through the workforce and family. How in
>the world do they have time to play video games for hours? The
>answer is that they just don’t ever grow up.

I suspect that they have learned early on what total bitches most
females are and are not allowing themselves to become involved in a
relationship that has the potential to ruin their lives. I believe
that they have determined that they can buy pussy and it a lot cheaper
than trading your soul for some that comes with a nagging mouth that
they will learn to hate after a few years.

Of course I could be mistaken.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Greg Pappadeaux  
View profile  
 More options Apr 26 2012, 2:30 am
Newsgroups: alt.politics.homosexuality, alt.atheism, misc.survivalism, soc.men
From: Greg Pappadeaux <inva...@not-for-mail.invalid>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 06:30:01 +0000 (UTC)
Local: Thurs, Apr 26 2012 2:30 am
Subject: Re: Why Does America Have So Many "Peter Pan" (Peeder Pansy) Men?
In article <lnphp7hppi1hs1h26n20kmp9ft4c7ni...@4ax.com>

You got her there.

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Jackaroo  
View profile  
 More options Apr 27 2012, 1:14 am
Newsgroups: alt.politics.homosexuality, alt.atheism
From: Jackaroo <jacka...@redmountain.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 01:14:05 -0400
Local: Fri, Apr 27 2012 1:14 am
Subject: Re: Why Does America Have So Many "Peter Pan" (Peeder Pansy) Men?

On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 00:29:42 -0700 (PDT), ladyas...@comcast.net wrote:
>On Thursday, April 26, 2012 2:30:01 AM UTC-4, Greg Pappadeaux wrote:

>> You got her there.

>If you are foolish enough to think sweeping generalizations are accurate, it is no surprise you are foolish enough to think he was right.

More of your lying hypocrisy, your posts are nothing but "sweeping
generalizations. I'll remind you of your recent claim that "... the
uneducated, Republicans and Christians are all bigots regarding gays"

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »