Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

What is heaven like?

26 views
Skip to first unread message

Father Haskell

unread,
Jun 9, 2013, 11:53:02 AM6/9/13
to
Would everyone get to do all of the fun stuff they were prohibited
from doing?

Tom McDonald

unread,
Jun 9, 2013, 1:20:29 PM6/9/13
to
On 6/9/2013 10:53 AM, Father Haskell wrote:
> Would everyone get to do all of the fun stuff they were prohibited
> from doing?
>
Maybe the Norse were right, and the afterlife is where we get to do all
the stuff we love but the monotheist religions don't let us do here on
Earth.

Free Lunch

unread,
Jun 9, 2013, 1:26:24 PM6/9/13
to
On Sun, 09 Jun 2013 12:20:29 -0500, Tom McDonald <kil...@gmail.com>
wrote in alt.atheism:
Sounds much more like heaven than the Church Lady version that so many
Christians offer.

Father Haskell

unread,
Jun 9, 2013, 2:27:48 PM6/9/13
to
On Jun 9, 1:26 pm, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
> On Sun, 09 Jun 2013 12:20:29 -0500, Tom McDonald <kilt...@gmail.com>
> wrote in alt.atheism:
>
> >On 6/9/2013 10:53 AM, Father Haskell wrote:
> >> Would everyone get to do all of the fun stuff they were prohibited
> >> from doing?
>
> >Maybe the Norse were right, and the afterlife is where we get to do all
> >the stuff we love but the monotheist religions don't let us do here on
> >Earth.
>
> Sounds much more like heaven than the Church Lady version that so many
> Christians offer.

Wait until they find out the truth.

%

unread,
Jun 9, 2013, 2:43:19 PM6/9/13
to
i already told them the truth

Mike Painter

unread,
Jun 9, 2013, 3:04:45 PM6/9/13
to
Like me singing?

Dakota

unread,
Jun 9, 2013, 4:00:09 PM6/9/13
to
They never will. Their final thought may be of a heaven though.

Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess

unread,
Jun 10, 2013, 2:45:45 AM6/10/13
to
On Sun, 9 Jun 2013 08:53:02 -0700 (PDT)
Like full frontal nudity? It won't be a sin anymore, or will it?

--
Fidem Turbāre, the non-existent atheist goddess
"Theists who push their own opinions [here] in alt.atheism deserve
whatever insults they get. There are all sorts of theist based
newsgroups for them to poison without intruding upon ours."
-- Virgil Ligriv (January 7, 2013)

Father Haskell

unread,
Jun 10, 2013, 3:31:39 AM6/10/13
to
On Jun 10, 2:45 am, "Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess"
<godd...@fidemturbare.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Jun 2013 08:53:02 -0700 (PDT)
>
> Father Haskell <fatherhask...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > Would everyone get to do all of the fun stuff they were prohibited
> > from doing?
>
> Like full frontal nudity?  It won't be a sin anymore, or will it?

Heaven's going to be a total Mazola orgy. Full frontal nudity? Feh.

%

unread,
Jun 10, 2013, 10:39:17 AM6/10/13
to
Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Jun 2013 08:53:02 -0700 (PDT)
> Father Haskell <father...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> Would everyone get to do all of the fun stuff they were prohibited
>> from doing?
>
> Like full frontal nudity? It won't be a sin anymore, or will it?

its not a sin now

Father Haskell

unread,
Jun 10, 2013, 10:54:16 AM6/10/13
to
Neither are floggers and Saint Andrew's crosses.

%

unread,
Jun 10, 2013, 11:04:58 AM6/10/13
to
the more sin the better

Father Haskell

unread,
Jun 10, 2013, 6:01:29 PM6/10/13
to
On Jun 10, 10:39 am, "%" <pers...@gmail.com> wrote:
People enjoy frontal nudity. It meets all of the qualifications
for being a sin.

%

unread,
Jun 10, 2013, 6:12:19 PM6/10/13
to
all the people that i do see nude should wear clothes and ,
all the ones i would like to see never do it

Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess

unread,
Jun 12, 2013, 12:17:32 AM6/12/13
to
Will they also have whips and chains up there so that the sadists and
the masochists can keep each other happy? Or is that only down below?

--
Fidem Turbāre, the non-existent atheist goddess
"The diversity of religious belief is not mysterious if you assume that
god is made by man. It certainly is mysterious if you assume that man
is made by god."
-- Christopher Hitchens

Dreamer In Colore

unread,
Jun 12, 2013, 12:44:23 AM6/12/13
to
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 21:17:32 -0700, "Fidem Turbare, the non-existent
atheist goddess" <god...@fidemturbare.com> wrote:

>On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 00:31:39 -0700 (PDT)
>Father Haskell <father...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> On Jun 10, 2:45 am, "Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess"
>> <godd...@fidemturbare.com> wrote:
>> > On Sun, 9 Jun 2013 08:53:02 -0700 (PDT)
>> > Father Haskell <fatherhask...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Would everyone get to do all of the fun stuff they were prohibited
>> > > from doing?
>> >
>> > Like full frontal nudity?  It won't be a sin anymore, or will it?
>>
>> Heaven's going to be a total Mazola orgy. Full frontal nudity? Feh.
>
>Will they also have whips and chains up there so that the sadists and
>the masochists can keep each other happy? Or is that only down below?

Down below, the sadists will have whips and chains but will not be
allowed to use them. The masochists will ask to be tortured, but
instead they'll get soft beds, comfortable clothing, and great food.

I know I'm going to be subjected to Duke and Patrick for eternity no
matter which direction I go.


Cheers,
Dreamer
AA 2306

Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess

unread,
Jun 12, 2013, 4:45:50 AM6/12/13
to
On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 00:44:23 -0400
Dreamer In Colore <dreamer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 21:17:32 -0700, "Fidem Turbare, the non-existent
> atheist goddess" <god...@fidemturbare.com> wrote:
> >On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 00:31:39 -0700 (PDT)
> >Father Haskell <father...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> On Jun 10, 2:45 am, "Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist
> >> goddess" <godd...@fidemturbare.com> wrote:
> >> > On Sun, 9 Jun 2013 08:53:02 -0700 (PDT)
> >> > Father Haskell <fatherhask...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Would everyone get to do all of the fun stuff they were
> >> > > prohibited from doing?
> >> >
> >> > Like full frontal nudity?  It won't be a sin anymore, or will it?
> >>
> >> Heaven's going to be a total Mazola orgy. Full frontal nudity?
> >> Feh.
> >
> >Will they also have whips and chains up there so that the sadists and
> >the masochists can keep each other happy? Or is that only down
> >below?
>
> Down below, the sadists will have whips and chains but will not be
> allowed to use them. The masochists will ask to be tortured, but
> instead they'll get soft beds, comfortable clothing, and great food.

So if torture and pain aren't to your liking, then remember to pretend
to be a masochist if you find yourself in Hell. (The masochists have
it easy because they'll get what they want by not asking for anything.)

If Satan is an effective delegator, then that will be great news for
any saddist who finds herself in Hell.

> I know I'm going to be subjected to Duke and Patrick for eternity no
> matter which direction I go.

It's unclear whether stalking behaviour is classified as a sin.

--
Fidem Turbāre, the non-existent atheist goddess
"The very essence of instinct is that it's followed independently of
reason."
-- Charles Darwin

Devils Advocaat

unread,
Jun 12, 2013, 5:10:04 AM6/12/13
to
On 9 June, 16:53, Father Haskell <fatherhask...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Would everyone get to do all of the fun stuff they were prohibited
> from doing?

Nope

Jeanne Douglas

unread,
Jun 12, 2013, 5:41:59 PM6/12/13
to
In article <20130612014550.65e0...@fidemturbare.com>,
I would consider it a violattion of "Love thy neighbor", but what do I know.

--

JD

"Osama Bin Laden is dead and GM is alive."--VP Joseph Biden

%

unread,
Jun 12, 2013, 5:51:28 PM6/12/13
to
Jeanne Douglas wrote:
> In article <20130612014550.65e0...@fidemturbare.com>,
> "Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess"
> <god...@fidemturbare.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 00:44:23 -0400
>> Dreamer In Colore <dreamer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 21:17:32 -0700, "Fidem Turbare, the non-existent
>>> atheist goddess" <god...@fidemturbare.com> wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 00:31:39 -0700 (PDT)
>>>> Father Haskell <father...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Jun 10, 2:45�am, "Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist
>>>>> goddess" <godd...@fidemturbare.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Sun, 9 Jun 2013 08:53:02 -0700 (PDT)
>>>>>> Father Haskell <fatherhask...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Would everyone get to do all of the fun stuff they were
>>>>>>> prohibited from doing?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Like full frontal nudity? �It won't be a sin anymore, or will
>>>>>> it?
>>>>>
>>>>> Heaven's going to be a total Mazola orgy. Full frontal nudity?
>>>>> Feh.
>>>>
>>>> Will they also have whips and chains up there so that the sadists
>>>> and the masochists can keep each other happy? Or is that only down
>>>> below?
>>>
>>> Down below, the sadists will have whips and chains but will not be
>>> allowed to use them. The masochists will ask to be tortured, but
>>> instead they'll get soft beds, comfortable clothing, and great food.
>>
>> So if torture and pain aren't to your liking, then remember to
>> pretend to be a masochist if you find yourself in Hell. (The
>> masochists have it easy because they'll get what they want by not
>> asking for anything.)
>>
>> If Satan is an effective delegator, then that will be great news for
>> any saddist who finds herself in Hell.
>>
>>> I know I'm going to be subjected to Duke and Patrick for eternity no
>>> matter which direction I go.
>>
>> It's unclear whether stalking behaviour is classified as a sin.
>
> I would consider it a violattion of "Love thy neighbor", but what do
> I know.

i agree its definitely a violattion

duke

unread,
Jun 13, 2013, 4:26:02 PM6/13/13
to
On Sun, 9 Jun 2013 08:53:02 -0700 (PDT), Father Haskell
<father...@yahoo.com> wrote:

That all ends when you die.

The dukester, American - American

********************************************
Repeal Obama
You simply can't fix stupid.
********************************************

Father Haskell

unread,
Jun 19, 2013, 8:49:16 AM6/19/13
to
On Thursday, June 13, 2013 4:26:02 PM UTC-4, duke wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Jun 2013 08:53:02 -0700 (PDT), Father Haskell
>
> <father...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> >Would everyone get to do all of the fun stuff they were prohibited
>
> >from doing?
>
>
>
> That all ends when you die.

What ends? The prohibition?

Malcolm McMahon

unread,
Jun 19, 2013, 12:04:55 PM6/19/13
to
On Thursday, 13 June 2013 21:26:02 UTC+1, duke wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Jun 2013 08:53:02 -0700 (PDT), Father Haskell
>
> <father...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> >Would everyone get to do all of the fun stuff they were prohibited
>
> >from doing?
>
>
>
> That all ends when you die.
>
>

Having sexual organs, presumably. Surplus to requirements and would distract from worship and magnification.

Father Haskell

unread,
Jun 19, 2013, 5:36:30 PM6/19/13
to
Duke is going to be SO disappointed.

Don Martin

unread,
Jun 19, 2013, 7:28:22 PM6/19/13
to
On Wed, 19 Jun 2013 05:49:16 -0700 (PDT), Father Haskell
<father...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>On Thursday, June 13, 2013 4:26:02 PM UTC-4, duke wrote:
>> On Sun, 9 Jun 2013 08:53:02 -0700 (PDT), Father Haskell
>>
>> <father...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> >Would everyone get to do all of the fun stuff they were prohibited
>>
>> >from doing?
>>
>>
>>
>> That all ends when you die.
>
>What ends? The prohibition?

Yup! When you're dead, you get to do whatever you like. No need for
Viagra when rigor mortis sets in!

--

aa #2278 Never mind "proof." Where is your evidence?
BAAWA Chief Assistant to the Assistant Chief Heckler
Fidei defensor (Hon. Antipodean)
The Squeeky Wheel: http://home.comcast.net/~drdonmartin/

Dreamer In Colore

unread,
Jun 19, 2013, 7:40:04 PM6/19/13
to
On Wed, 19 Jun 2013 14:36:30 -0700 (PDT), Father Haskell
<father...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>On Wednesday, June 19, 2013 12:04:55 PM UTC-4, Malcolm McMahon wrote:
>> On Thursday, 13 June 2013 21:26:02 UTC+1, duke wrote:
>>
>> > On Sun, 9 Jun 2013 08:53:02 -0700 (PDT), Father Haskell
>>
>> >
>>
>> > <father...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> >
>>
>> >
>>
>> >
>>
>> > >Would everyone get to do all of the fun stuff they were prohibited
>>
>> >
>>
>> > >from doing?
>>
>> >
>>
>> >
>>
>> >
>>
>> > That all ends when you die.
>>
>> >
>>
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> Having sexual organs, presumably. Surplus to requirements and would distract from worship and magnification.
>
>Duke is going to be SO disappointed.

Why? There's no evidence he has any at the moment, and he keeps making
references to "numbnuts"...

Cheers,
Dreamer
AA 2306
0 new messages