I know it sounds funny, but the Theory of Relativity sounded funny too
a century ago, and now Einstein is equivalent to high IQ. I don't want
to brag about my IQ, but this theory of mine makes a lot of sense.The
Judeo-Christian viewpoint is that a male god gave birth to everything,
while the scientists propose their own Big Bang theory, which kind of
makes sense. I mean you must really use all your brainpower to get a
hint of what happened in the beginning of times.
Well, relax. In the beginning there was a Big Vulva that gave birth to
everything, big and small, close and distant. I had that inspiration
while sitting in the boondocks, just before going to NYC.
<ThenDestroyEveryth...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:
> On 9/1/2012 8:40 PM, TibetanMonkey, the Beach Cruiser Philosopher wrote:
> "In the Beginning the Big Vulva gave birth to everything"
> > I know it sounds funny, but the Theory of Relativity sounded funny too
> > a century ago, and now Einstein is equivalent to high IQ.
> I would say that the BIG vulva theory is incomplete because there was a
> partial birth abortion and that was botched and became this universe.
Or Big Vulva could have given birth to twin universes. Scientists talk
about parallel universes, so everything makes sense, at least in the
Twilight Zone.
> > <ThenDestroyEveryth...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:
> > > On 9/1/2012 8:40 PM, TibetanMonkey, the Beach Cruiser Philosopher wrote:
> > > "In the Beginning the Big Vulva gave birth to everything"
> > > > I know it sounds funny, but the Theory of Relativity sounded funny too
> > > > a century ago, and now Einstein is equivalent to high IQ.
> > > I would say that the BIG vulva theory is incomplete because there was a
> > > partial birth abortion and that was botched and became this universe.
> > Or Big Vulva could have given birth to twin universes. Scientists talk
> > about parallel universes, so everything makes sense, at least in the
> > Twilight Zone.
> > What doesn't make sense is life in the boondocks.
> I heard mention of the idea that universes are like living cells. One
> can split into two and two can collide and become one. The big bang
> could be the act of a collision of two cells (universes).
And it also makes sense that two particles become one living organism
--you and me.
It takes two to tango.
The idea that a god alone could have made the Universe is dismissed.
On Sat, 1 Sep 2012 17:36:08 -0700 (PDT), "TibetanMonkey, the Beach
Cruiser Philosopher" <thetibetanmon...@gmail.com> wrote:
>I know it sounds funny, but the Theory of Relativity sounded funny too
>a century ago, and now Einstein is equivalent to high IQ. I don't want
>to brag about my IQ, but this theory of mine makes a lot of sense.The
>Judeo-Christian viewpoint is that a male god gave birth to everything,
>while the scientists propose their own Big Bang theory, which kind of
>makes sense. I mean you must really use all your brainpower to get a
>hint of what happened in the beginning of times.
>Well, relax. In the beginning there was a Big Vulva that gave birth to
>everything, big and small, close and distant. I had that inspiration
>while sitting in the boondocks, just before going to NYC.
I shall not even think about how it got pregnant in the first place.
Les Hellawell
Greeting from:
YORKSHIRE - The White Rose County
"In our more diverse and secular society, the place of religion has
come to be a matter of lively discussion. It is rightly acknowledged
that people of faith have no monopoly of virtue and that the wellbeing
and prosperity of the nation depend on the contribution of individuals
and groups of all faiths and of none. "
- Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II
- from a speech to the Synond of the Church of England in 2010
"TibetanMonkey, the Beach Cruiser Philosopher" <thetibetanmon...@gmail.com> wrote in news:3f0b18b6-e596-4203-b990-
55e114a6f...@z8g2000yql.googlegroups.com:
> I know it sounds funny, but the Theory of Relativity sounded funny too
> a century ago, and now Einstein is equivalent to high IQ. I don't want
> to brag about my IQ, but this theory of mine makes a lot of sense.The
> Judeo-Christian viewpoint is that a male god gave birth to everything,
> while the scientists propose their own Big Bang theory, which kind of
> makes sense. I mean you must really use all your brainpower to get a
> hint of what happened in the beginning of times.
> Well, relax. In the beginning there was a Big Vulva that gave birth to
> everything, big and small, close and distant. I had that inspiration
> while sitting in the boondocks, just before going to NYC.
The Jesus Myth has an infinte god impregnating a young virgin. You would think that shoving an infinitely large cock into a tight Jewish pussy might lead to tearing. Current theistic "thought" has Gawd making his member small enough by placing it in an ice cold shower and thinking of Margaret Thatcher naked. As with all religious doctrine there is a small sect who insist that imagining Margaret Thatcher naked is actually erotic and cannot therefore be Troo ScripSure.
<catpainme...@gmail.com> wrote:
>"TibetanMonkey, the Beach Cruiser Philosopher" <thetibetanmon...@gmail.com> >wrote in news:3f0b18b6-e596-4203-b990-
>55e114a6f...@z8g2000yql.googlegroups.com:
>> I know it sounds funny, but the Theory of Relativity sounded funny too
>> a century ago, and now Einstein is equivalent to high IQ. I don't want
>> to brag about my IQ, but this theory of mine makes a lot of sense.The
>> Judeo-Christian viewpoint is that a male god gave birth to everything,
>> while the scientists propose their own Big Bang theory, which kind of
>> makes sense. I mean you must really use all your brainpower to get a
>> hint of what happened in the beginning of times.
>> Well, relax. In the beginning there was a Big Vulva that gave birth to
>> everything, big and small, close and distant. I had that inspiration
>> while sitting in the boondocks, just before going to NYC.
>The Jesus Myth has an infinte god impregnating a young virgin. You would >think that shoving an infinitely large cock into a tight Jewish pussy might >lead to tearing. Current theistic "thought" has Gawd making his member small >enough by placing it in an ice cold shower and thinking of Margaret Thatcher >naked.
Do you mind you are putting me off me Sunday lunch mate.
I was thinking of having roast pork with stuffing from the local
carvery
(passing two churches on the way. One Methodist, oh sorry that is now
a dance school and a goodness knows what church - they all look alike)
> As with all religious doctrine there is a small sect who insist that >imagining Margaret Thatcher naked is actually erotic and cannot therefore be >Troo ScripSure.
I >Catpain Merca
Les Hellawell
Greeting from:
YORKSHIRE - The White Rose County
"In our more diverse and secular society, the place of religion has come to be a matter of lively discussion. It is rightly acknowledged that people of faith have no monopoly of virtue and that the wellbeing and prosperity of the nation depend on the contribution of individuals and groups of all faiths and of none. "
- Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II
- from a speech to the Synond of the Church of England in 2010
> On Sat, 1 Sep 2012 17:36:08 -0700 (PDT), "TibetanMonkey, the Beach
> Cruiser Philosopher" <thetibetanmon...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >I know it sounds funny, but the Theory of Relativity sounded funny too
> >a century ago, and now Einstein is equivalent to high IQ. I don't want
> >to brag about my IQ, but this theory of mine makes a lot of sense.The
> >Judeo-Christian viewpoint is that a male god gave birth to everything,
> >while the scientists propose their ownBigBang theory, which kind of
> >makes sense. I mean you must really use all your brainpower to get a
> >hint of what happened in the beginning of times.
> >Well, relax. In the beginning there was aBigVulvathat gave birth to
> >everything,bigand small, close and distant. I had that inspiration
> >while sitting in the boondocks, just before going to NYC.
> I shall not even think about how it got pregnant in the first place.
> Les Hellawell
> Greeting from:
> YORKSHIRE - The White Rose County
> "In our more diverse and secular society, the place of religion has
> come to be a matter of lively discussion. It is rightly acknowledged
> that people of faith have no monopoly of virtue and that the wellbeing
> and prosperity of the nation depend on the contribution of individuals
> and groups of all faiths and of none. "
> - Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II
> - from a speech to the Synond of the Church of England in 2010
Sperms were flying in the Universe?
Perhaps Big Vulva gave birth to God and he, well you know the rest.
Cruiser Philosopher" <thetibetanmon...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Sep 2, 5:08 am, Les <l...@sharnt.tell> wrote:
>> On Sat, 1 Sep 2012 17:36:08 -0700 (PDT), "TibetanMonkey, the Beach
>> Cruiser Philosopher" <thetibetanmon...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >I know it sounds funny, but the Theory of Relativity sounded funny too
>> >a century ago, and now Einstein is equivalent to high IQ. I don't want
>> >to brag about my IQ, but this theory of mine makes a lot of sense.The
>> >Judeo-Christian viewpoint is that a male god gave birth to everything,
>> >while the scientists propose their ownBigBang theory, which kind of
>> >makes sense. I mean you must really use all your brainpower to get a
>> >hint of what happened in the beginning of times.
>> >Well, relax. In the beginning there was aBigVulvathat gave birth to
>> >everything,bigand small, close and distant. I had that inspiration
>> >while sitting in the boondocks, just before going to NYC.
>> I shall not even think about how it got pregnant in the first place.
>> Les Hellawell
>> Greeting from:
>> YORKSHIRE - The White Rose County
>> "In our more diverse and secular society, the place of religion has
>> come to be a matter of lively discussion. It is rightly acknowledged
>> that people of faith have no monopoly of virtue and that the wellbeing
>> and prosperity of the nation depend on the contribution of individuals
>> and groups of all faiths and of none. "
>> - Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II
>> - from a speech to the Synond of the Church of England in 2010
>Sperms were flying in the Universe?
Ah so it was not the big bang but the big bang gang?
>Perhaps Big Vulva gave birth to God and he, well you know the rest.
Les Hellawell
Greeting from:
YORKSHIRE - The White Rose County
"In our more diverse and secular society, the place of religion has
come to be a matter of lively discussion. It is rightly acknowledged
that people of faith have no monopoly of virtue and that the wellbeing
and prosperity of the nation depend on the contribution of individuals
and groups of all faiths and of none. "
- Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II
- from a speech to the Synond of the Church of England in 2010
> "TibetanMonkey, the Beach Cruiser Philosopher" <thetibetanmon...@gmail.com>
> wrote in news:3f0b18b6-e596-4203-b990-
> 55e114a6f...@z8g2000yql.googlegroups.com:
> > I know it sounds funny, but the Theory of Relativity sounded funny too
> > a century ago, and now Einstein is equivalent to high IQ. I don't want
> > to brag about my IQ, but this theory of mine makes a lot of sense.The
> > Judeo-Christian viewpoint is that a male god gave birth to everything,
> > while the scientists propose their own Big Bang theory, which kind of
> > makes sense. I mean you must really use all your brainpower to get a
> > hint of what happened in the beginning of times.
> > Well, relax. In the beginning there was a Big Vulva that gave birth to
> > everything, big and small, close and distant. I had that inspiration
> > while sitting in the boondocks, just before going to NYC.
> The Jesus Myth has an infinte god impregnating a young virgin. You would
> think that shoving an infinitely large cock into a tight Jewish pussy might
> lead to tearing. Current theistic "thought" has Gawd making his member small
> enough by placing it in an ice cold shower and thinking of Margaret Thatcher
> naked. As with all religious doctrine there is a small sect who insist that
> imagining Margaret Thatcher naked is actually erotic and cannot therefore be
> Troo ScripSure.
> Catpain Merca
> --
> .
And this confirms my theory that YOU NEED A VULVA to produce something
and that something was Jesus.
God could produce the Universe alone, then Adam & Eve --so claim the
Christians-- but not Jesus.
> On Sun, 2 Sep 2012 08:26:50 -0700 (PDT), "TibetanMonkey, the Beach
> Cruiser Philosopher" <thetibetanmon...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Sep 2, 5:08 am, Les <l...@sharnt.tell> wrote:
> >> On Sat, 1 Sep 2012 17:36:08 -0700 (PDT), "TibetanMonkey, the Beach
> >> Cruiser Philosopher" <thetibetanmon...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >I know it sounds funny, but the Theory of Relativity sounded funny too
> >> >a century ago, and now Einstein is equivalent to high IQ. I don't want
> >> >to brag about my IQ, but this theory of mine makes a lot of sense.The
> >> >Judeo-Christian viewpoint is that a male god gave birth to everything,
> >> >while the scientists propose their ownBigBang theory, which kind of
> >> >makes sense. I mean you must really use all your brainpower to get a
> >> >hint of what happened in the beginning of times.
> >> >Well, relax. In the beginning there was aBigVulvathat gave birth to
> >> >everything,bigand small, close and distant. I had that inspiration
> >> >while sitting in the boondocks, just before going to NYC.
> >> I shall not even think about how it got pregnant in the first place.
> >> Les Hellawell
> >> Greeting from:
> >> YORKSHIRE - The White Rose County
> >> "In our more diverse and secular society, the place of religion has
> >> come to be a matter of lively discussion. It is rightly acknowledged
> >> that people of faith have no monopoly of virtue and that the wellbeing
> >> and prosperity of the nation depend on the contribution of individuals
> >> and groups of all faiths and of none. "
> >> - Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II
> >> - from a speech to the Synond of the Church of England in 2010
> >Sperms were flying in the Universe?
> Ah so it was not the big bang but the big bang gang?
At the moment of the Big Bang the sperms got spread out throughout the
Universe. Then the Big Vulva was impregnated.
> Once again you err because you don't know Scripture.
> "Let us create man in Our image. ...male and female he created them. ...and the two became one." Many Biblical scholars believe that god is either male and female or a hermaphrodite. Based on the Genesis Cration story it is only logical that God is both male and female.
God is either he, she or he-she...
He-shes are considered freaks, but they have their own place in the
Universe.
> On Sep 2, 11:19 pm, Sir Ridesalot <i_am_cycle_pat...@yahoo.ca> wrote:
> > On Sunday, September 2, 2012 2:29:49 PM UTC-4, TibetanMonkey, the Beach Cruiser Philosopher wrote:
> > > I know it sounds funny, but the Theory of Relativity sounded funny too
> > > a century ago, and now Einstein is equivalent to high IQ. I don't want
> > > to brag about my IQ, but this theory of mine makes a lot of sense.
> IQ is only part of the package. You sometimes make a lot of sense,
> but it's prenetic and hit-and-miss (largely miss).
> > > The
> > > Judeo-Christian viewpoint is that a male god gave birth to everything,
> > > while the scientists propose their own Big Bang theory, which kind of
> > > makes sense. I mean you must really use all your brainpower to get a
> > > hint of what happened in the beginning of times. Well,relax. In the
> > > beginning there was a Big Vulva that gave birth to everything, big and
> > > small, close and distant.
> > > I had that inspiration while sitting in the boondocks, just before
> > > going to NYC.
> > Once again you err because you don't know Scripture.
> > "Let us create man in Our image. ...male and female he created them. ...
> Except that *you* err because you've got that turned around.
Thanks for the compliment. But may I say in defense of my brilliant
Vulva Theory that it has the same flaw as the idea of a creator,
namely where the vulva came from or who created the creator. The idea
of a creator is just a comfortable idea for those who don't have a
curious mind.
> On Monday, September 3, 2012 11:28:35 AM UTC-7, TibetanMonkey, the Beach Cruiser Philosopher wrote:
> > On Sep 3, 12:49 pm, Dan O <danover...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Sep 2, 11:19 pm, Sir Ridesalot <i_am_cycle_pat...@yahoo.ca> wrote:
> > > > On Sunday, September 2, 2012 2:29:49 PM UTC-4, TibetanMonkey, the Beach Cruiser Philosopher wrote:
> > > > > I know it sounds funny, but the Theory of Relativity sounded funny too
> > > > > a century ago, and now Einstein is equivalent to high IQ. I don't want
> > > > > to brag about my IQ, but this theory of mine makes a lot of sense.
> > > IQ is only part of the package. You sometimes make a lot of sense,
> > > but it's prenetic and hit-and-miss (largely miss).
> > > > > The
> > > > > Judeo-Christian viewpoint is that a male god gave birth to everything,
> > > > > while the scientists propose their own Big Bang theory, which kind of
> > > > > makes sense. I mean you must really use all your brainpower to get a
> > > > > hint of what happened in the beginning of times. Well,relax. In the
> > > > > beginning there was a Big Vulva that gave birth to everything, big and
> > > > > small, close and distant.
> > > > > I had that inspiration while sitting in the boondocks, just before
> > > > > going to NYC.
> > > > Once again you err because you don't know Scripture.
> > > > "Let us create man in Our image. ...male and female he created them. ...
> > > Except that *you* err because you've got that turned around.
> > Thanks for the compliment. But may I say in defense of my brilliant
> > Vulva Theory that it has the same flaw as the idea of a creator,
> > namely where the vulva came from or who created the creator. The idea
> > of a creator is just a comfortable idea for those who don't have a
> > curious mind.
> > As you say, we created the creator.
> Therein rests the Big Question. I personally believe that the universe is too complex to have "just evolved" as it has, there is a beautiful logic to its complexities, and the multitude of life forms within it.
> Mankind has the unique burden of wondering "why", in contrast with other species, a unique capability that must have a greater purpose than mere happenstance. This wonder is the very basis of science, looking for the truth in all things.
> I for one cannot fill my mind with delusions of grandeur, assuming that the Creator is a mere creation of this mind. That feels like mere arrogance. Accordingly, attributing "political" will to God and donning sexuality upon one who certainly doesn't need reproductive organs just makes little sense.
You haven't given much thought to the issue, it seems:
1- Who made god?
2- What did he do for eons before the creation?
3- Why he made a Universe so incredibly large to house such an
insignificant creature? That creature is us, of course.
Now reporting from New Jersey, we went for a long walk, and bumped
into the "Virgin of Bergenline" (named after the street of the same
name) and she looks something like this...
One of the ladies standing guard at the site of the apparition said
it's the same Virgin of Guadalupe, and I saw what I wanted to see... A
VULVA. I hope you can see it too.
<ThenDestroyEveryth...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:
> On 9/4/2012 12:33 AM, TibetanMonkey, the Beach Cruiser Philosopher wrote:> Now reporting from New Jersey, we went for a long walk, and bumped
> > into the "Virgin of Bergenline" (named after the street of the same
> > name) and she looks something like this...
> > One of the ladies standing guard at the site of the apparition said
> > it's the same Virgin of Guadalupe, and I saw what I wanted to see... A
> > VULVA. I hope you can see it too.
> > And this seems to confirm my Big Vulva theory.
> It confirms that you have a theory...
If we need more evidence, we only need to turn to the evidence
provided by the hunter gatherers...
