Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

On what day of the week was the world created?

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Father Haskell

unread,
Jan 1, 2010, 7:41:48 PM1/1/10
to
And prove it.

Mark Evans

unread,
Jan 1, 2010, 7:59:35 PM1/1/10
to
On Jan 1, 7:41 pm, Father Haskell <fatherhask...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> And prove it.

Hmm. Tricky one. You need to define creation first since it was,
according to the bible, a multi-day process. At what point was it
finished? I prefer the more logical, scientific origin.

Mark Evans

Andrew

unread,
Jan 1, 2010, 8:11:29 PM1/1/10
to

Neither's going to give you an answer to the question.

Father Haskell

unread,
Jan 1, 2010, 8:13:08 PM1/1/10
to

Also, what did god have for breakfast that morning? I'd
think bacon and eggs with a stack of flapjacks and
Canadian maple syrup. No fucking way you can create
the heavens and the earth on oatmeal.

MoronicAn...@oo.oo

unread,
Jan 1, 2010, 8:28:20 PM1/1/10
to
On Sat, 2 Jan 2010 01:11:29 +0000, Andrew <thec...@macunlimited.net>
wrote:

Because it's a fairy story, imbecile.

raven1

unread,
Jan 1, 2010, 8:36:07 PM1/1/10
to
On Fri, 1 Jan 2010 16:41:48 -0800 (PST), Father Haskell
<father...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>And prove it.

Depends on what religion you're enquiring about, or what you mean by
"the world". If one takes the Genesis account, the creation would have
begun on a Sunday, so as to end with God resting on the Sabbath at the
end, but since it's a myth, there's no more way to "prove" it than any
other myth..

ilbe...@gmail.com

unread,
Jan 1, 2010, 9:53:35 PM1/1/10
to
On Jan 1, 6:41 pm, Father Haskell <fatherhask...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> And prove it.

The answer is in Genesis 1 .

Father Haskell

unread,
Jan 1, 2010, 9:56:56 PM1/1/10
to

"The bible" is *never* an answer, but a cop-out.

ilbe...@gmail.com

unread,
Jan 1, 2010, 9:58:20 PM1/1/10
to

Would that'scientific' origin be : Accidental Gaseous clouds
condensed into providing the Earth ... complete with over 150 extreme
razor edge precise Life Enabling Physics Constants so that Earth can
exist and be constantly maintained ?!

Free Lunch

unread,
Jan 1, 2010, 10:01:26 PM1/1/10
to
On Fri, 1 Jan 2010 18:53:35 -0800 (PST), "IlBe...@gmail.com"
<ilbe...@gmail.com> wrote in alt.talk.creationism:

>On Jan 1, 6:41�pm, Father Haskell <fatherhask...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> And prove it.
>
>The answer is in Genesis 1 .

So you claim. Why would we believe you with your track record?

ilbe...@gmail.com

unread,
Jan 1, 2010, 10:02:38 PM1/1/10
to

Well 'Father' .... it seems like youve got it all figured out so early
in this New Year ; a Fools display of pride and gross arrogance .
Your knee,' Fathe'r, is going to bow before the real Father of Heaven
and Earth one day ... and it will be willingly too. Be prepared.
Its going to be a very scary thing to fall into the hands of the
Universes Creator having mocked him all your life.

Free Lunch

unread,
Jan 1, 2010, 10:13:09 PM1/1/10
to
On Fri, 1 Jan 2010 19:02:38 -0800 (PST), "IlBe...@gmail.com"
<ilbe...@gmail.com> wrote in alt.atheism:

My, my, my, aren't you full of yourself and your ignorant nonsense
today.

Pink Freud

unread,
Jan 1, 2010, 10:59:20 PM1/1/10
to

"IlBe...@gmail.com" <ilbe...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:08e4e55f-a6a9-4389...@22g2000yqr.googlegroups.com...

ROFL!

Ken

unread,
Jan 1, 2010, 11:00:06 PM1/1/10
to
Where's that "proof" of your's, Dickwadd?

JohnN

unread,
Jan 1, 2010, 11:16:21 PM1/1/10
to
On Jan 1, 7:41 pm, Father Haskell <fatherhask...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> And prove it.

Monday, in the morning, nothing good comes from going to work on
Monday morning.

JohnN

Lorentz

unread,
Jan 1, 2010, 11:26:13 PM1/1/10
to
On Jan 1, 7:59 pm, Mark Evans <markevans1...@gmail.com> wrote:

Okay. On what day did the Lord say "Let there be light?"

Mike Painter

unread,
Jan 1, 2010, 11:37:50 PM1/1/10
to
Father Haskell wrote:
> And prove it.

Yesterday. Thursday according to The Church Of Last Thursday.
Maeve The Cat did it and she will end it all next Wednesday at midnight.

I have a clear memory, implanted by her, of actually seeing a picture of Her
Purrfectness a few years ago.
That plus her implanting memories of the FSM coming after her creation
proves it.

Don't listen to the heathen Tuesdayists


Father Haskell

unread,
Jan 1, 2010, 11:50:08 PM1/1/10
to

You think maybe he likes blueberry syrup on his pancakes?

Father Haskell

unread,
Jan 1, 2010, 11:51:29 PM1/1/10
to

What constants? This is a universe where the ratio of
diameter to circumference goes on forever.

Father Haskell

unread,
Jan 1, 2010, 11:55:14 PM1/1/10
to

Olrik

unread,
Jan 2, 2010, 12:22:13 AM1/2/10
to
Le 2010-01-01 22:02, IlBe...@gmail.com a �crit :

You just jumped the shark, troll.

Olrik

unread,
Jan 2, 2010, 12:25:41 AM1/2/10
to
Le 2010-01-01 20:13, Father Haskell a �crit :

> On Jan 1, 7:59 pm, Mark Evans<markevans1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Jan 1, 7:41 pm, Father Haskell<fatherhask...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>> And prove it.
>>
>> Hmm. Tricky one. You need to define creation first since it was,
>> according to the bible, a multi-day process. At what point was it
>> finished? I prefer the more logical, scientific origin.
>
> Also, what did god have for breakfast that morning? I'd
> think bacon and eggs with a stack of flapjacks and
> Canadian maple syrup.

The very best maple syrup is from Quebec, not Canada.

Saying 'Canadian maple syrup' is like saying 'American cassoulet' or
'American pasta'.

Olrik

unread,
Jan 2, 2010, 12:26:49 AM1/2/10
to
Le 2010-01-01 21:53, IlBe...@gmail.com a �crit :

> On Jan 1, 6:41 pm, Father Haskell<fatherhask...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> And prove it.
>
> The answer is in Genesis 1 .

So tell us the day in question.

Father Haskell

unread,
Jan 2, 2010, 12:29:52 AM1/2/10
to
On Jan 2, 12:25 am, Olrik <olrik...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Le 2010-01-01 20:13, Father Haskell a crit :
>
> > On Jan 1, 7:59 pm, Mark Evans<markevans1...@gmail.com>  wrote:
> >> On Jan 1, 7:41 pm, Father Haskell<fatherhask...@yahoo.com>  wrote:
>
> >>> And prove it.
>
> >> Hmm.  Tricky one.  You need to define creation first since it was,
> >> according to the bible, a multi-day process.  At what point was it
> >> finished?  I prefer the more logical, scientific origin.
>
> > Also, what did god have for breakfast that morning?  I'd
> > think bacon and eggs with a stack of flapjacks and
> > Canadian maple syrup.
>
> The very best maple syrup is from Quebec, not Canada.

The father in the Frank Zappa classic "Magdelena" would
concur.

> Saying 'Canadian maple syrup' is like saying 'American cassoulet' or
> 'American pasta'.

Quebecoi maple syrup, it is.

Peter

unread,
Jan 2, 2010, 3:47:27 AM1/2/10
to

"Lorentz" <drose...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3e88cdf2-e3c1-4315...@j14g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...

On a dark day?


raven1

unread,
Jan 2, 2010, 9:45:44 AM1/2/10
to

Verse, please.

raven1

unread,
Jan 2, 2010, 9:48:24 AM1/2/10
to
On Fri, 1 Jan 2010 19:02:38 -0800 (PST), "IlBe...@gmail.com"
<ilbe...@gmail.com> wrote:

Yawn. And what are you going to do on the dread day Cthulhu and the
other Old Ones arise from the ocean to devour all of humanity?

If you aren't worried at the prospect, why would you think that
atheists might be worried about your myth either?

hypa...@comcast.net

unread,
Jan 2, 2010, 10:01:35 AM1/2/10
to

Yeah, and you know what this Heavenly Father will say?
"Hey! You forgot the beefsteak. How am I supposed to
create an entire world without a full farmer's breakfast?!"

hypa...@comcast.net

unread,
Jan 2, 2010, 10:02:53 AM1/2/10
to

The one before he made the sun. He never could get that right.

hypa...@comcast.net

unread,
Jan 2, 2010, 10:06:02 AM1/2/10
to
On Jan 2, 12:25 am, Olrik <olrik...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Le 2010-01-01 20:13, Father Haskell a crit :
>
> > On Jan 1, 7:59 pm, Mark Evans<markevans1...@gmail.com>  wrote:
> >> On Jan 1, 7:41 pm, Father Haskell<fatherhask...@yahoo.com>  wrote:
>
> >>> And prove it.
>
> >> Hmm.  Tricky one.  You need to define creation first since it was,
> >> according to the bible, a multi-day process.  At what point was it
> >> finished?  I prefer the more logical, scientific origin.
>
> > Also, what did god have for breakfast that morning?  I'd
> > think bacon and eggs with a stack of flapjacks and
> > Canadian maple syrup.
>
> The very best maple syrup is from Quebec, not Canada.

Last I heard,Quebec is still part of Canada. Don't
tell them that, though.

hypa...@comcast.net

unread,
Jan 2, 2010, 10:08:14 AM1/2/10
to
On Jan 2, 9:48 am, raven1 <quoththera...@nevermore.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Jan 2010 19:02:38 -0800 (PST), "IlBeBa...@gmail.com"

>
>
>
>
>
> <ilbeba...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Jan 1, 7:13 pm, Father Haskell <fatherhask...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> On Jan 1, 7:59 pm, Mark Evans <markevans1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> > On Jan 1, 7:41 pm, Father Haskell <fatherhask...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >> > > And prove it.
>
> >> > Hmm.  Tricky one.  You need to define creation first since it was,
> >> > according to the bible, a multi-day process.  At what point was it
> >> > finished?  I prefer the more logical, scientific origin.
>
> >> Also, what did god have for breakfast that morning?  I'd
> >> think bacon and eggs with a stack of flapjacks and
> >> Canadian maple syrup.  No fucking way you can create
> >> the heavens and the earth on oatmeal.
>
> >Well 'Father' .... it seems like youve got it all figured out so early
> >in this New Year ;   a  Fools display of pride and gross arrogance .
> >Your knee,' Fathe'r, is going to bow before the real Father of Heaven
> >and Earth  one day  ... and it will be willingly too.   Be prepared.
> >Its going to be a very scary thing to fall into the hands of the
> >Universes Creator having mocked him all your life.
>
> Yawn. And what are you going to do on the dread day Cthulhu and the
> other Old Ones arise from the ocean to devour all of humanity?

Screaming his head off, just like the rest of us, I imagine.

harry k

unread,
Jan 2, 2010, 11:36:23 AM1/2/10
to
On Jan 2, 7:02 am, "hypati...@comcast.net" <hypati...@comcast.net>
wrote:

Shush! You aren't supposed to mention that. It embarrasses him.

Harry K

Mike Painter

unread,
Jan 2, 2010, 2:17:48 PM1/2/10
to

And the other light, the one at night that some call the moon.

Day 1 - Light
Day 2 - 3 Stuff
Day 4
Unknown lights
Gen:14 And God said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to
divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons,
and for days, and years:
1:15 And let them be for lights in the firmament of the heaven to give light
upon the earth: and it was so. (But not a lot of light)

Sun, moon, and stars
1:16 And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and
the lesser light to rule the night: he made the stars also.
1:17 And God set them in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the
earth,
1:18 And to rule over the day and over the night, and to divide the light
from the darkness: and God saw that it was good.


Olrik

unread,
Jan 2, 2010, 2:17:53 PM1/2/10
to
Le 2010-01-02 10:06, hypa...@comcast.net a �crit :

> On Jan 2, 12:25 am, Olrik<olrik...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Le 2010-01-01 20:13, Father Haskell a crit :
>>
>>> On Jan 1, 7:59 pm, Mark Evans<markevans1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Jan 1, 7:41 pm, Father Haskell<fatherhask...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>> And prove it.
>>
>>>> Hmm. Tricky one. You need to define creation first since it was,
>>>> according to the bible, a multi-day process. At what point was it
>>>> finished? I prefer the more logical, scientific origin.
>>
>>> Also, what did god have for breakfast that morning? I'd
>>> think bacon and eggs with a stack of flapjacks and
>>> Canadian maple syrup.
>>
>> The very best maple syrup is from Quebec, not Canada.
>
> Last I heard,Quebec is still part of Canada. Don't
> tell them that, though.

There's still an important distinction, though. If you want Canadian red
wine, make sure it does *not* come from Qu�bec!

;-)

Mike Painter

unread,
Jan 2, 2010, 2:19:13 PM1/2/10
to
As soon as I stop laughing I will tell you that they did not include that
picture.


Uncle Vic

unread,
Jan 2, 2010, 5:13:18 PM1/2/10
to

Since there was already light before the "Lord" created it, there is no
"Lord".

--
Uncle Vic
aa Atheist #2011
Christians are like Slinkys. They're boring, but they'll put a smile on
your face when you push them down the stairs.

Father Haskell

unread,
Jan 2, 2010, 7:17:02 PM1/2/10
to
On Jan 2, 10:01 am, "hypati...@comcast.net" <hypati...@comcast.net>
wrote:

How about a beer and a couple of greasy pizza slices
from the night before?

Father Haskell

unread,
Jan 2, 2010, 7:19:33 PM1/2/10
to
On Jan 2, 10:06 am, "hypati...@comcast.net" <hypati...@comcast.net>
wrote:

> On Jan 2, 12:25 am, Olrik <olrik...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Le 2010-01-01 20:13, Father Haskell a crit :
>
> > > On Jan 1, 7:59 pm, Mark Evans<markevans1...@gmail.com>  wrote:
> > >> On Jan 1, 7:41 pm, Father Haskell<fatherhask...@yahoo.com>  wrote:
>
> > >>> And prove it.
>
> > >> Hmm.  Tricky one.  You need to define creation first since it was,
> > >> according to the bible, a multi-day process.  At what point was it
> > >> finished?  I prefer the more logical, scientific origin.
>
> > > Also, what did god have for breakfast that morning?  I'd
> > > think bacon and eggs with a stack of flapjacks and
> > > Canadian maple syrup.
>
> > The very best maple syrup is from Quebec, not Canada.
>
> Last I heard,Quebec is still part of Canada. Don't
> tell them that, though.

The Quebecoi speak French. Everyone else
speaks Canadian.

Father Haskell

unread,
Jan 2, 2010, 7:26:31 PM1/2/10
to
On Jan 2, 2:17 pm, "Mike Painter" <md.pain...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

> hypati...@comcast.net wrote:
> > On Jan 1, 11:26 pm, Lorentz <drosen0...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> On Jan 1, 7:59 pm, Mark Evans <markevans1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>> On Jan 1, 7:41 pm, Father Haskell <fatherhask...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >>>> And prove it.
>
> >>> Hmm. Tricky one. You need to define creation first since it was,
> >>> according to the bible, a multi-day process. At what point was it
> >>> finished? I prefer the more logical, scientific origin.
>
> >>> Mark Evans
>
> >> Okay. On what day did the Lord say "Let there be light?"
>
> > The one before he made the sun. He never could get that right.
>
> And the other light, the one at night that some call the moon.

Only two weeks out of the month. If we needed constant
moonlight, he should have created two of them, same orbit,
180 degrees apart.

Free Lunch

unread,
Jan 2, 2010, 7:28:27 PM1/2/10
to
On Sat, 2 Jan 2010 16:26:31 -0800 (PST), Father Haskell
<father...@yahoo.com> wrote in alt.atheism:

It is surprising that the author of that particular claim in Genesis
didn't catch how much he screwed up there.

Father Haskell

unread,
Jan 2, 2010, 7:36:58 PM1/2/10
to

http://kchan.kordix.com/1236147201.jpg

Touched by his noodly appendage.

raven1

unread,
Jan 2, 2010, 7:58:22 PM1/2/10
to

<crickets>

Father Haskell

unread,
Jan 2, 2010, 8:01:44 PM1/2/10
to
On Jan 2, 7:58 pm, raven1 <quoththera...@nevermore.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 09:45:44 -0500, raven1
>
> <quoththera...@nevermore.com> wrote:

> >On Fri, 1 Jan 2010 18:53:35 -0800 (PST), "IlBeBa...@gmail.com"
> ><ilbeba...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>On Jan 1, 6:41 pm, Father Haskell <fatherhask...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >>> And prove it.
>
> >>The answer is in Genesis 1 .
>
> >Verse, please.
>
> <crickets>

<frozen dead crickets>

Alan Ford

unread,
Jan 2, 2010, 8:46:57 PM1/2/10
to
Father Haskell proudly displayed his idiocy by writing:

>>> The very best maple syrup is from Quebec, not Canada.
>> Last I heard,Quebec is still part of Canada. Don't
>> tell them that, though.
>
> The Quebecoi speak French. Everyone else
> speaks Canadian.


Eh?

--
If you don't beat your meat
You can't have any pudding
How can you have any pudding
If you don't beat your meat?

Christopher A. Lee

unread,
Jan 2, 2010, 8:57:04 PM1/2/10
to
On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 17:46:57 -0800, Alan Ford <zzz...@qqq.net> wrote:

>Father Haskell proudly displayed his idiocy by writing:
>
>>>> The very best maple syrup is from Quebec, not Canada.
>>> Last I heard,Quebec is still part of Canada. Don't
>>> tell them that, though.
>>
>> The Quebecoi speak French. Everyone else
>> speaks Canadian.
>
>Eh?

Canada is spelled CND.

C, eh?, N, eh?, D, eh?

Alex W

unread,
Jan 2, 2010, 9:00:38 PM1/2/10
to
On Fri, 1 Jan 2010 16:41:48 -0800 (PST), Father Haskell
wrote:

> And prove it.

The first Monday after a long weekend of kegs, meth and
peyote.

The proof?
Too many design faults to mention.
Poodles.
Platypus.

Father Haskell

unread,
Jan 2, 2010, 11:10:35 PM1/2/10
to
On Jan 2, 7:28 pm, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Jan 2010 16:26:31 -0800 (PST), Father Haskell
> <fatherhask...@yahoo.com> wrote in alt.atheism:

No one ever claimed god was a rocket scientist.


Olrik

unread,
Jan 2, 2010, 11:45:29 PM1/2/10
to
Le 2010-01-02 20:01, Father Haskell a �crit :

<delicious fried crickets>

Pink Freud

unread,
Jan 2, 2010, 11:49:42 PM1/2/10
to

"Olrik" <olri...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:hhp7dg$bpd$1...@news.eternal-september.org...

<I'll never understand cricket>

Father Haskell

unread,
Jan 3, 2010, 12:06:39 AM1/3/10
to
On Jan 2, 11:45 pm, Olrik <olrik...@yahoo.com> wrote:

Kosher, I think. Order orthoptera, same as locusts.


Olrik

unread,
Jan 3, 2010, 12:25:41 AM1/3/10
to
Le 2010-01-03 00:06, Father Haskell a �crit :

> On Jan 2, 11:45 pm, Olrik<olrik...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Le 2010-01-02 20:01, Father Haskell a �crit :

>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Jan 2, 7:58 pm, raven1<quoththera...@nevermore.com> wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 09:45:44 -0500, raven1
>>
>>>> <quoththera...@nevermore.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 1 Jan 2010 18:53:35 -0800 (PST), "IlBeBa...@gmail.com"
>>>>> <ilbeba...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>>> On Jan 1, 6:41 pm, Father Haskell<fatherhask...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> And prove it.
>>
>>>>>> The answer is in Genesis 1 .
>>
>>>>> Verse, please.
>>
>>>> <crickets>
>>
>>> <frozen dead crickets>
>>
>> <delicious fried crickets>
>
> Kosher, I think. Order orthoptera, same as locusts.

Well, you do have to snip off something before cooking.

Father Haskell

unread,
Jan 3, 2010, 12:27:59 AM1/3/10
to
On Jan 3, 12:25 am, Olrik <olrik...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Le 2010-01-03 00:06, Father Haskell a écrit :
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jan 2, 11:45 pm, Olrik<olrik...@yahoo.com>  wrote:
> >> Le 2010-01-02 20:01, Father Haskell a écrit :
>
> >>> On Jan 2, 7:58 pm, raven1<quoththera...@nevermore.com>    wrote:
> >>>> On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 09:45:44 -0500, raven1
>
> >>>> <quoththera...@nevermore.com>    wrote:
> >>>>> On Fri, 1 Jan 2010 18:53:35 -0800 (PST), "IlBeBa...@gmail.com"
> >>>>> <ilbeba...@gmail.com>    wrote:
>
> >>>>>> On Jan 1, 6:41 pm, Father Haskell<fatherhask...@yahoo.com>    wrote:
> >>>>>>> And prove it.
>
> >>>>>> The answer is in Genesis 1 .
>
> >>>>> Verse, please.
>
> >>>> <crickets>
>
> >>> <frozen dead crickets>
>
> >> <delicious fried crickets>
>
> > Kosher, I think.  Order orthoptera, same as locusts.
>
> Well, you do have to snip off something before cooking.

Which requires a rabbi. As does the slaughter.

Olrik

unread,
Jan 3, 2010, 12:30:27 AM1/3/10
to
Le 2010-01-03 00:27, Father Haskell a �crit :

> On Jan 3, 12:25 am, Olrik<olrik...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Le 2010-01-03 00:06, Father Haskell a �crit :

>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Jan 2, 11:45 pm, Olrik<olrik...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>> Le 2010-01-02 20:01, Father Haskell a �crit :

>>
>>>>> On Jan 2, 7:58 pm, raven1<quoththera...@nevermore.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 09:45:44 -0500, raven1
>>
>>>>>> <quoththera...@nevermore.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Fri, 1 Jan 2010 18:53:35 -0800 (PST), "IlBeBa...@gmail.com"
>>>>>>> <ilbeba...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>> On Jan 1, 6:41 pm, Father Haskell<fatherhask...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> And prove it.
>>
>>>>>>>> The answer is in Genesis 1 .
>>
>>>>>>> Verse, please.
>>
>>>>>> <crickets>
>>
>>>>> <frozen dead crickets>
>>
>>>> <delicious fried crickets>
>>
>>> Kosher, I think. Order orthoptera, same as locusts.
>>
>> Well, you do have to snip off something before cooking.
>
> Which requires a rabbi. As does the slaughter.

Oh well, I give up. KFC it is!

Olrik

panam...@hotmail.com

unread,
Jan 3, 2010, 12:37:34 AM1/3/10
to
On Jan 1, 9:53 pm, "IlBeBa...@gmail.com" <ilbeba...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jan 1, 6:41 pm, Father Haskell <fatherhask...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > And prove it.
>
> The answer is in Genesis 1 .

Sega created the world?

http://www.amazon.com/Genesis-Original-Model-Console-System/dp/B0007MZWQS

-Panama Floyd, Atlanta.
aa#2015/Member, Knights of BAAWA!

Father Haskell

unread,
Jan 3, 2010, 12:39:22 AM1/3/10
to
On Jan 3, 12:30 am, Olrik <olrik...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Le 2010-01-03 00:27, Father Haskell a écrit :
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jan 3, 12:25 am, Olrik<olrik...@yahoo.com>  wrote:
> >> Le 2010-01-03 00:06, Father Haskell a écrit :
>
> >>> On Jan 2, 11:45 pm, Olrik<olrik...@yahoo.com>    wrote:
> >>>> Le 2010-01-02 20:01, Father Haskell a écrit :
>
> >>>>> On Jan 2, 7:58 pm, raven1<quoththera...@nevermore.com>      wrote:
> >>>>>> On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 09:45:44 -0500, raven1
>
> >>>>>> <quoththera...@nevermore.com>      wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Fri, 1 Jan 2010 18:53:35 -0800 (PST), "IlBeBa...@gmail.com"
> >>>>>>> <ilbeba...@gmail.com>      wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>> On Jan 1, 6:41 pm, Father Haskell<fatherhask...@yahoo.com>      wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> And prove it.
>
> >>>>>>>> The answer is in Genesis 1 .
>
> >>>>>>> Verse, please.
>
> >>>>>> <crickets>
>
> >>>>> <frozen dead crickets>
>
> >>>> <delicious fried crickets>
>
> >>> Kosher, I think.  Order orthoptera, same as locusts.
>
> >> Well, you do have to snip off something before cooking.
>
> > Which requires a rabbi.  As does the slaughter.
>
> Oh well, I give up. KFC it is!

Chicken a la Axle Grease?


Olrik

unread,
Jan 3, 2010, 12:45:01 AM1/3/10
to
Le 2010-01-03 00:39, Father Haskell a �crit :

> On Jan 3, 12:30 am, Olrik<olrik...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Le 2010-01-03 00:27, Father Haskell a �crit :

>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Jan 3, 12:25 am, Olrik<olrik...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>> Le 2010-01-03 00:06, Father Haskell a �crit :

>>
>>>>> On Jan 2, 11:45 pm, Olrik<olrik...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Le 2010-01-02 20:01, Father Haskell a �crit :

>>
>>>>>>> On Jan 2, 7:58 pm, raven1<quoththera...@nevermore.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 09:45:44 -0500, raven1
>>
>>>>>>>> <quoththera...@nevermore.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 1 Jan 2010 18:53:35 -0800 (PST), "IlBeBa...@gmail.com"
>>>>>>>>> <ilbeba...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Jan 1, 6:41 pm, Father Haskell<fatherhask...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> And prove it.
>>
>>>>>>>>>> The answer is in Genesis 1 .
>>
>>>>>>>>> Verse, please.
>>
>>>>>>>> <crickets>
>>
>>>>>>> <frozen dead crickets>
>>
>>>>>> <delicious fried crickets>
>>
>>>>> Kosher, I think. Order orthoptera, same as locusts.
>>
>>>> Well, you do have to snip off something before cooking.
>>
>>> Which requires a rabbi. As does the slaughter.
>>
>> Oh well, I give up. KFC it is!
>
> Chicken a la Axle Grease?

Anytime, anywhere. It's not healthy food, but jebus H. bloody fucking
christ it's so very good for the soul!

Olrik


panam...@hotmail.com

unread,
Jan 3, 2010, 12:52:26 AM1/3/10
to

Y'all should skip the chain store copy and try the real thing
sometime..

http://www.marymacs.com/
http://www.watershedrestaurant.com/menuSpecials.htm

And that's just in town. If you can't make it to Atlanta, here's a few
more..

http://www.southernliving.com/travel/mid-atlantic/the-souths-best-fried-chicken-00400000005934/

I'm sure none of `em are as good as my Grandma's, but since Grandma
has passed on, they'll have to do..

Olrik

unread,
Jan 3, 2010, 1:05:20 AM1/3/10
to
Le 2010-01-03 00:52, panam...@hotmail.com a �crit :

Thanks for the info, but I'm stuck here in Qu�bec, where fried chicken
is KFC or nothing. It's not a traditional food here. BBQ chicken is, but
no fried.

The *only* place where you can have real fried chicken is KFC.

And their coleslaw is to die for.

Olrik

Mike Painter

unread,
Jan 3, 2010, 2:00:37 AM1/3/10
to

No, it used to be full all the time but after the fall...


Mike Painter

unread,
Jan 3, 2010, 2:04:04 AM1/3/10
to

Gahan Wilson's Jiminy Cricket in a bottle cartoon.


Andre Lieven

unread,
Jan 3, 2010, 2:04:57 AM1/3/10
to
On Jan 3, 1:05 am, Olrik <olrik...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >http://www.southernliving.com/travel/mid-atlantic/the-souths-best-fri...

>
> > I'm sure none of `em are as good as my Grandma's, but since Grandma
> > has passed on, they'll have to do..
>
> Thanks for the info, but I'm stuck here in Québec, where fried chicken

> is KFC or nothing. It's not a traditional food here. BBQ chicken is, but
> no fried.

Hmm... Check out what you can find at a Loblaws. In Ottawa,
they often carry fried chicken at the deli counter. Ditto for
Great Canadian Superstore, though I doubt that they're in
Quebec...

> The *only* place where you can have real fried chicken is KFC.
>
> And their coleslaw is to die for.

OTOH, where you are, there is smoked meat and poutine.

Andre

Mike Painter

unread,
Jan 3, 2010, 2:21:12 AM1/3/10
to

Platypus yes, poodles, no.
The standard is a wonderful intelligent dog and even teh smaller breeds are
great animals
IF
they are treated as dogs and not somebody's child.

I had a friend who was a vet in San Diego. He frequently got Little Old Lady
dogs in who would only eat fried chicken.
If they liked the chicken they ate it and the dog got dog food. The owner
had trained it to not eat anything else from her.


Masked Avenger

unread,
Jan 3, 2010, 5:21:01 AM1/3/10
to

It's very simple .......

You have two sides, one out in the field and one in. Each man that's in
the side that's in goes out, and when he's out he comes in and the next
man goes in until he's out. When they are all out, the side that's out
comes in and the side that's been in goes out and tries to get those
coming in, out. Sometimes you get men still in and not out.
When a man goes out to go in, the men who are out try to get him out,
and when he is out he goes in and the next man in goes out and goes in.
There are two men called umpires who stay out all the time and they
decide when the men who are in are out. When both sides have been in and
all the men have been out, and both sides have been out twice after all
the men have been in, including those who are not out, that is the end
of the game

it's funny old game ....... but very popular in some parts .....

--
MA ....Yoiks .... and away .....

Only two things are infinite, the Universe and human stupidity
............. and I'm not sure about the Universe ..........
- A. Einstein

Does Schr�dinger's cat have 18 half lives ?

Alex W

unread,
Jan 3, 2010, 6:01:06 AM1/3/10
to
On Fri, 1 Jan 2010 17:13:08 -0800 (PST), Father Haskell
wrote:

> On Jan 1, 7:59�pm, Mark Evans <markevans1...@gmail.com> wrote:


>> On Jan 1, 7:41�pm, Father Haskell <fatherhask...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>> And prove it.
>>

>> Hmm. �Tricky one. �You need to define creation first since it was,
>> according to the bible, a multi-day process. �At what point was it
>> finished? �I prefer the more logical, scientific origin.
>

> Also, what did god have for breakfast that morning? I'd
> think bacon and eggs with a stack of flapjacks and
> Canadian maple syrup. No fucking way you can create
> the heavens and the earth on oatmeal.

Rubbish.

God, as everyone knows, is an Englishman.
Englishmen wouldn't be seen dead with pancakes or syrup for
breakfast.

It therefore follows inevitably that God, before creating
our sceptr'd isle and then the rest of the world, would have
tucked into a nourishing bowl of porridge, followed by a
bloater or two, some fried eggs, grilled tomato, mushrooms,
a generous dollop of baked beans, some fried bread and a
slice or three of black pudding, all washed down with a big
pot of milky manna (1). Closure would be achieved by
nibbling on some toast with orange and ginger marmalade.
Thus fortified, creation -- or indeed procreation -- may
safely be undertaken for the entire day!

In this context, it is also curious to note that the Empire
died when we were seduced by foreign muck infesting our
breakfast tables -- corn flakes from the rebels, coffee and
croissants from the filthy Frogs and the like. Now that our
morning repast has commonly degenerated to a mug of Nescafe
instnat and a <shudder> bran muffin, our total capitulation
to the forces of EUrope cannot be far off, alas.


(1) either PG Tips or Typhoo, but the theological debate is
still unresolved on this matter, having had to spend rather
too much energy in defeating the Yorkshire Gold heresy)

(2) coarse cut, of course!

Alex W

unread,
Jan 3, 2010, 7:10:35 AM1/3/10
to
On Sun, 03 Jan 2010 21:21:01 +1100, Masked Avenger wrote:

> Pink Freud wrote:


>>
>> <I'll never understand cricket>
>
> It's very simple .......
>
> You have two sides, one out in the field and one in. Each man that's in
> the side that's in goes out, and when he's out he comes in and the next
> man goes in until he's out. When they are all out, the side that's out
> comes in and the side that's been in goes out and tries to get those
> coming in, out. Sometimes you get men still in and not out.
> When a man goes out to go in, the men who are out try to get him out,
> and when he is out he goes in and the next man in goes out and goes in.
> There are two men called umpires who stay out all the time and they
> decide when the men who are in are out. When both sides have been in and
> all the men have been out, and both sides have been out twice after all
> the men have been in, including those who are not out, that is the end
> of the game
>
> it's funny old game ....... but very popular in some parts .....

You forgot to mention the most important part: breaking for
tea!


Don Martin

unread,
Jan 3, 2010, 7:18:21 AM1/3/10
to

You call in that nearsighted gentleman, the Cricket Mohel.

-

aa #2278 Never mind "proof." Where is your evidence?
Fidei defensor (Hon. Antipodean)
The Squeeky Wheel: http://home.comcast.net/~drdonmartin/

harry k

unread,
Jan 3, 2010, 10:43:08 AM1/3/10
to
On Jan 3, 2:21 am, Masked Avenger <coote...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Pink Freud wrote:
>
> > "Olrik" <olrik...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >news:hhp7dg$bpd$1...@news.eternal-september.org...

Thanks for your explanation. I never understood it before.

Harry K

Pink Freud

unread,
Jan 3, 2010, 10:52:11 AM1/3/10
to

"Masked Avenger" <coot...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:4b406fa3$0$11336$afc3...@news.optusnet.com.au...

Cool, thanks! That all makes perfect sense now!
<runs for hills>

Free Lunch

unread,
Jan 3, 2010, 12:06:45 PM1/3/10
to
On Sun, 3 Jan 2010 11:01:06 +0000, Alex W <ing...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in
alt.talk.creationism:

>On Fri, 1 Jan 2010 17:13:08 -0800 (PST), Father Haskell
>wrote:
>
>> On Jan 1, 7:59�pm, Mark Evans <markevans1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Jan 1, 7:41�pm, Father Haskell <fatherhask...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> And prove it.
>>>
>>> Hmm. �Tricky one. �You need to define creation first since it was,
>>> according to the bible, a multi-day process. �At what point was it
>>> finished? �I prefer the more logical, scientific origin.
>>
>> Also, what did god have for breakfast that morning? I'd
>> think bacon and eggs with a stack of flapjacks and
>> Canadian maple syrup. No fucking way you can create
>> the heavens and the earth on oatmeal.
>
>Rubbish.
>
>God, as everyone knows, is an Englishman.
>Englishmen wouldn't be seen dead with pancakes or syrup for
>breakfast.

Now it is time to join in a rousing chorus:

And did those feet in ancient time
Walk upon England's mountains green?
And was the holy Lamb of God
On England's pleasant pastures seen?
And did the Countenance Divine
Shine forth upon our clouded hills?
And was Jerusalem builded here
Among those dark Satanic mills?

Bring me my bow of burning gold:
Bring me my arrows of desire:
Bring me my spear: O clouds, unfold!
Bring me my chariot of fire!
I will not cease from mental fight,
Nor shall my sword sleep in my hand
Till we have built Jerusalem
In England's green and pleasant land.

Les Hellawell

unread,
Jan 3, 2010, 12:55:57 PM1/3/10
to
On Sun, 03 Jan 2010 21:21:01 +1100, Masked Avenger
<coot...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>Pink Freud wrote:
>>
>> "Olrik" <olri...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:hhp7dg$bpd$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
>>> Le 2010-01-02 20:01, Father Haskell a �crit :
>>>> On Jan 2, 7:58 pm, raven1<quoththera...@nevermore.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 09:45:44 -0500, raven1
>>>>>
>>>>> <quoththera...@nevermore.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, 1 Jan 2010 18:53:35 -0800 (PST), "IlBeBa...@gmail.com"
>>>>>> <ilbeba...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Jan 1, 6:41 pm, Father Haskell<fatherhask...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> And prove it.
>>>>>
>>>>>>> The answer is in Genesis 1 .
>>>>>
>>>>>> Verse, please.
>>>>>
>>>>> <crickets>
>>>>
>>>> <frozen dead crickets>
>>>
>>> <delicious fried crickets>
>>
>> <I'll never understand cricket>
>
>It's very simple .......
>
>You have two sides, one out in the field and one in. Each man that's in
>the side that's in goes out, and when he's out he comes in and the next
>man goes in until he's out. When they are all out,

Well there's always one who is not out remember even though he
goes in

The man who is first in but is not out when the rest are goes in
carrying his bat. Cricketers who carry their bats become cricket
heroes as few manage it to do it. Many of them are run out with
their bats or caught at first or or second slip, that is if they are
not stumped.

> the side that's out
>comes in and the side that's been in goes out and tries to get those
>coming in, out. Sometimes you get men still in and not out.
>When a man goes out to go in, the men who are out try to get him out,
>and when he is out he goes in and the next man in goes out and goes in.
>There are two men called umpires who stay out all the time and they
>decide when the men who are in are out.

but only if those who are not in call 'How is that' otherwise the man
who is out stays in.

> When both sides have been in and
>all the men have been out, and both sides have been out twice after all
>the men have been in, including those who are not out, that is the end
>of the game

Unless time runs out, in which case it is a draw


>
>it's funny old game ....... but very popular in some parts .....

Corfu for example.
http://www.corfutoday.com/cricket-in-corfu.htm


--
Les Hellawell
Greetings from: YORKSHIRE
The White Rose County

Olrik

unread,
Jan 3, 2010, 1:55:03 PM1/3/10
to
Le 2010-01-03 07:10, Alex W a �crit :

Crumpets. Tea and crumpets. Except in India, where they have tea and
actual crickets.

Father Haskell

unread,
Jan 3, 2010, 2:39:35 PM1/3/10
to

In America, it's a hot dog and beer, followed by more
beer.

Alex W

unread,
Jan 3, 2010, 7:09:08 PM1/3/10
to

Tears in my eyes, I tell you, and stiff upper lip definitely
aquiver ... particularly when followed by this:

Land of Hope and Glory, Mother of the Free,
How shall we extol thee, who are born of thee?
Wider still, and wider, shall thy bounds be set;
God, who made thee mighty, make thee mightier yet!

Truth and Right and Freedom, each a holy gem,
Stars of solemn brightness, weave thy diadem.

Tho' thy way be darkened, still in splendour drest,
As the star that trembles o'er the liquid West.

Throned amid the billows, throned inviolate,
Thou hast reigned victorious, thou has smiled at fate.

Land of Hope and Glory, fortress of the Free,
How may we extol thee, praise thee, honour thee?

Hark, a mighty nation maketh glad reply;
Lo, our lips are thankful, lo, our hearts are high!

Hearts in hope uplifted, loyal lips that sing;
Strong in faith and freedom, we have crowned our King!



Alex W

unread,
Jan 3, 2010, 7:18:27 PM1/3/10
to

Popularly known as the "Shane Warne Rule".

Should we enlighten the esteemed American audience as to the
difference between a googly and a chinaman, and throw in a
detailed examination of the Duckworth Lewis Method for good
measure? I'd also be happy to debate the pros and cons of
bothering with a leg gully when playing the windies....


>
>> When both sides have been in and
>>all the men have been out, and both sides have been out twice after all
>>the men have been in, including those who are not out, that is the end
>>of the game
>
> Unless time runs out, in which case it is a draw

... or unless it rains -- but I repeat your statement.


>>
>>it's funny old game ....... but very popular in some parts .....
>
> Corfu for example.
> http://www.corfutoday.com/cricket-in-corfu.htm

Or the US, oddly enough:

http://usaca.org/

Alex W

unread,
Jan 3, 2010, 7:20:43 PM1/3/10
to
On Sun, 03 Jan 2010 17:55:57 +0000, Les Hellawell wrote:

>>it's funny old game ....... but very popular in some parts .....
>
> Corfu for example.
> http://www.corfutoday.com/cricket-in-corfu.htm

Not sure about "popular", but possibly the oddest spot: on
the frozen lake of St Moritz in Switzerland. Apparently, a
local boarding school hired a cricket-mad Aussie and the
rest is ice....

http://www.cricket-on-ice.com/

Father Haskell

unread,
Jan 3, 2010, 7:23:06 PM1/3/10
to
On Jan 3, 7:09 pm, Alex W <ing...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>
> Land of Hope and Glory, Mother of the Free,
> How shall we extol thee, who are born of thee?
> Wider still, and wider, shall thy bounds be set;
> God, who made thee mighty, make thee mightier yet!

My father makes illegal whisky,
my mother makes illegal gin,
my sister sells sin on the corner,
my god, how the money rolls in!

Olrik

unread,
Jan 3, 2010, 7:23:53 PM1/3/10
to
Le 2010-01-03 02:04, Andre Lieven a �crit :

> On Jan 3, 1:05 am, Olrik<olrik...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Le 2010-01-03 00:52, panamfl...@hotmail.com a �crit :
>> Thanks for the info, but I'm stuck here in Qu�bec, where fried chicken

>> is KFC or nothing. It's not a traditional food here. BBQ chicken is, but
>> no fried.
>
> Hmm... Check out what you can find at a Loblaws. In Ottawa,
> they often carry fried chicken at the deli counter. Ditto for
> Great Canadian Superstore, though I doubt that they're in
> Quebec...

Yeah, we have those fried chicken pieces. They're not very good, though,
and not as popular as the BBQ kind.

>> The *only* place where you can have real fried chicken is KFC.
>>
>> And their coleslaw is to die for.
>
> OTOH, where you are, there is smoked meat and poutine.

Oh yeah! I live a stone's trow away from Schwartz's, arguably the very
best smoked meat restaurant on the planet.

I must confess never having poutine...

> Andre

Budikka666

unread,
Jan 3, 2010, 9:22:20 PM1/3/10
to
On Jan 1, 6:41 pm, Father Haskell <fatherhask...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> And prove it.

Well if he phinished on Friday and rested on the sabbath and it took
six days, it had to be a Sunday, dinnit? The Bible proves it dunnit?
Where'd I cullict me prise?

Budikka

Budikka666

unread,
Jan 3, 2010, 9:22:51 PM1/3/10
to
Unmet challenge #1
The challenge I offered you in this thread:
http://tinyurl.com/nubnxr
on May 11th 2009, only to see you RUN AWAY.

Unmet challenge #2
Provide *positive*, *scientific* evidence *for* a creation. Not Bible
quotes. Not quotes from creationists or atheists or evolutionists.
Not divine revelation. Not juvenile unsupported ignorant assertions.
Not chants of 'no it isn't!'. Not counter challenges when you haven't
even met ours, but *positive*, *scientific* evidence *for* a creation.

Unmet challenge #3
Provide evidence that shows how DNA is the work of a creator. Show us
this evidence and explain how it demonstrates a creator.

Unmet challenge #4
Support claims that bacteria have never arisen from anything other
than bacteria/life has never arisen from anything but life.

Unmet challenge #5
Provide evidence in support of the creationist claim that information
cannot be added to a genome.

Unmet challenge #6
Define scientifically what the "genetic boundaries" are: specifically
what the mechanism is which (according to creationist claims) prevents
one species from evolving into another species over time.

Unmet Challenge #7
Provide your scientific evidence (as opposed to your LYING,
unsupported bullshit, which has been refuted repeatedly) to support
your creationist claim that life cannot arise from organic chemistry,
when scientists have repeatedly demonstrated that the truth is quite
to the contrary

Unmet Challenge #8
Prove that there's a god out there waiting to judge me when I die.
Otherwise you and your creationist fundie ilk are nothing but pathetic
LIARS and FRAUDS.

Unmet Challenge #9
Prove that we have a soul. Demonstrate scientifically where it is and
what its purpose is.

Unmet Challenge #10
Prove that this fictional Jesus isn't fictional and that he literally
died and that he came back to life and went to Heaven.

Here's a list of the strongest advocates of creation on Usenet WHO
HAVE FLED one or more of these challenges:
Chicken Adman
Chicken Andrew
Chicken Brother Ted
Chicken Codebreaker
Chicken Curtjester1
Chicken Duke
Chicken Gabriel
Chicken I'll Be Bauck
Chicken Pastor Dave

Let's face it, NOT A SINGLE creationist on Usenet has been able to
find the guts to face these challenges. This fictional god of theirs
has deserted every one of these liars and frauds That's what a sad,
pathetic and vacuous bunch of lousy, low-life scum they are.

Case closed. End of story. End of You.

Budikka

hypa...@comcast.net

unread,
Jan 3, 2010, 10:40:06 PM1/3/10
to
On Jan 2, 7:17 pm, Father Haskell <fatherhask...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Jan 2, 10:01 am, "hypati...@comcast.net" <hypati...@comcast.net>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jan 1, 10:02 pm, "IlBeBa...@gmail.com" <ilbeba...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> > > On Jan 1, 7:13 pm, Father Haskell <fatherhask...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Jan 1, 7:59 pm, Mark Evans <markevans1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > On Jan 1, 7:41 pm, Father Haskell <fatherhask...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > And prove it.
>
> > > > > Hmm.  Tricky one.  You need to define creation first since it was,
> > > > > according to the bible, a multi-day process.  At what point was it
> > > > > finished?  I prefer the more logical, scientific origin.
>
> > > > Also, what did god have for breakfast that morning?  I'd
> > > > think bacon and eggs with a stack of flapjacks and
> > > > Canadian maple syrup.  No fucking way you can create
> > > > the heavens and the earth on oatmeal.
>
> > > Well 'Father' .... it seems like youve got it all figured out so early
> > > in this New Year ;   a  Fools display of pride and gross arrogance .
> > > Your knee,' Fathe'r, is going to bow before the real Father of Heaven
> > > and Earth  one day  ... and it will be willingly too.   Be prepared.
> > > Its going to be a very scary thing to fall into the hands of the
> > > Universes Creator having mocked him all your life.
>
> > Yeah, and you know what this Heavenly Father will say?
> > "Hey! You forgot the beefsteak. How am I supposed to
> > create an entire world without a full farmer's breakfast?!"
>
> How about a beer and a couple of greasy pizza slices
> from the night before?-

Drop the beer and heat the pizza.

hypa...@comcast.net

unread,
Jan 3, 2010, 10:41:13 PM1/3/10
to
On Jan 2, 7:19 pm, Father Haskell <fatherhask...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Jan 2, 10:06 am, "hypati...@comcast.net" <hypati...@comcast.net>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jan 2, 12:25 am, Olrik <olrik...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > Le 2010-01-01 20:13, Father Haskell a crit :

>
> > > > On Jan 1, 7:59 pm, Mark Evans<markevans1...@gmail.com>  wrote:
> > > >> On Jan 1, 7:41 pm, Father Haskell<fatherhask...@yahoo.com>  wrote:
>
> > > >>> And prove it.
>
> > > >> Hmm.  Tricky one.  You need to define creation first since it was,
> > > >> according to the bible, a multi-day process.  At what point was it
> > > >> finished?  I prefer the more logical, scientific origin.
>
> > > > Also, what did god have for breakfast that morning?  I'd
> > > > think bacon and eggs with a stack of flapjacks and
> > > > Canadian maple syrup.
>
> > > The very best maple syrup is from Quebec, not Canada.
>
> > Last I heard,Quebec is still part of Canada. Don't
> > tell them that, though.
>
> The Quebecoi speak French.  Everyone else
> speaks Canadian

Not being Canadian, I'm not aboot to get into such a discussion.

hypa...@comcast.net

unread,
Jan 3, 2010, 11:10:47 PM1/3/10
to
On Jan 3, 12:30 am, Olrik <olrik...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Le 2010-01-03 00:27, Father Haskell a écrit :
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jan 3, 12:25 am, Olrik<olrik...@yahoo.com>  wrote:
> >> Le 2010-01-03 00:06, Father Haskell a écrit :
>
> >>> On Jan 2, 11:45 pm, Olrik<olrik...@yahoo.com>    wrote:
> >>>> Le 2010-01-02 20:01, Father Haskell a écrit :
>
> >>>>> On Jan 2, 7:58 pm, raven1<quoththera...@nevermore.com>      wrote:
> >>>>>> On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 09:45:44 -0500, raven1
>
> >>>>>> <quoththera...@nevermore.com>      wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Fri, 1 Jan 2010 18:53:35 -0800 (PST), "IlBeBa...@gmail.com"
> >>>>>>> <ilbeba...@gmail.com>      wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>> On Jan 1, 6:41 pm, Father Haskell<fatherhask...@yahoo.com>      wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> And prove it.
>

> >>>>>>>> The answer is in Genesis 1 .
>
> >>>>>>> Verse, please.
>
> >>>>>> <crickets>
>
> >>>>> <frozen dead crickets>
>
> >>>> <delicious fried crickets>
>
> >>> Kosher, I think.  Order orthoptera, same as locusts.
>
> >> Well, you do have to snip off something before cooking.
>
> > Which requires a rabbi.  As does the slaughter.
>
> Oh well, I give up. KFC it is!
>
Fantastic, and some fries, too.

hypa...@comcast.net

unread,
Jan 3, 2010, 11:21:17 PM1/3/10
to
On Jan 3, 12:39 am, Father Haskell <fatherhask...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Jan 3, 12:30 am, Olrik <olrik...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Le 2010-01-03 00:27, Father Haskell a écrit :
>
> > > On Jan 3, 12:25 am, Olrik<olrik...@yahoo.com>  wrote:
> > >> Le 2010-01-03 00:06, Father Haskell a écrit :
>
> > >>> On Jan 2, 11:45 pm, Olrik<olrik...@yahoo.com>    wrote:
> > >>>> Le 2010-01-02 20:01, Father Haskell a écrit :
>
> > >>>>> On Jan 2, 7:58 pm, raven1<quoththera...@nevermore.com>      wrote:
> > >>>>>> On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 09:45:44 -0500, raven1
>
> > >>>>>> <quoththera...@nevermore.com>      wrote:
> > >>>>>>> On Fri, 1 Jan 2010 18:53:35 -0800 (PST), "IlBeBa...@gmail.com"
> > >>>>>>> <ilbeba...@gmail.com>      wrote:
>
> > >>>>>>>> On Jan 1, 6:41 pm, Father Haskell<fatherhask...@yahoo.com>      wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>> And prove it.
>
> > >>>>>>>> The answer is in Genesis 1 .
>
> > >>>>>>> Verse, please.
>
> > >>>>>> <crickets>
>
> > >>>>> <frozen denead crickets>

>
> > >>>> <delicious fried crickets>
>
> > >>> Kosher, I think.  Order orthoptera, same as locusts.
>
> > >> Well, you do have to snip off something before cooking.
>
> > > Which requires a rabbi.  As does the slaughter.
>
> > Oh well, I give up. KFC it is!
>
> Chicken a la Axle Grease?

Hey! I love KFC chicken. A bucket of chicken legs
would be pure heaven right now -the real thing. Not
eternally singing to some magical egomaniac.

hypa...@comcast.net

unread,
Jan 3, 2010, 11:24:23 PM1/3/10
to
On Jan 3, 2:04 am, "Mike Painter" <md.pain...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> Olrik wrote:

I like the legless frog desperately wheeling his way
away from a kitchen.

hypa...@comcast.net

unread,
Jan 3, 2010, 11:39:00 PM1/3/10
to
On Jan 3, 10:52 am, "Pink Freud" <somewh...@here.com> wrote:
> "Masked Avenger" <coote...@yahoo.com> wrote in message

>
> news:4b406fa3$0$11336$afc3...@news.optusnet.com.au...
>
>
>
>
>
> > Pink Freud wrote:
>
> >> "Olrik" <olrik...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >>news:hhp7dg$bpd$1...@news.eternal-september.org...

Sounds kinda like a male porno film...

hypa...@comcast.net

unread,
Jan 3, 2010, 11:40:58 PM1/3/10
to

Salted and covered with chocolate?

Father Haskell

unread,
Jan 3, 2010, 11:43:56 PM1/3/10
to
On Jan 3, 10:40 pm, "hypati...@comcast.net" <hypati...@comcast.net>

They had microwaves in heaven back then?

hypa...@comcast.net

unread,
Jan 3, 2010, 11:44:40 PM1/3/10
to

What does the singer do to make money.?

Father Haskell

unread,
Jan 3, 2010, 11:49:57 PM1/3/10
to
On Jan 3, 2:04 am, "Mike Painter" <md.pain...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> Olrik wrote:
> > Le 2010-01-02 20:01, Father Haskell a écrit :
> >> On Jan 2, 7:58 pm, raven1<quoththera...@nevermore.com>  wrote:
> >>> On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 09:45:44 -0500, raven1
>
> >>> <quoththera...@nevermore.com>  wrote:
> >>>> On Fri, 1 Jan 2010 18:53:35 -0800 (PST), "IlBeBa...@gmail.com"
> >>>> <ilbeba...@gmail.com>  wrote:
>

> >>>>> On Jan 1, 6:41 pm, Father Haskell<fatherhask...@yahoo.com>  wrote:
> >>>>>> And prove it.
>
> >>>>> The answer is in Genesis 1 .
>
> >>>> Verse, please.
>
> >>> <crickets>
>
> >> <frozen dead crickets>
>
> > <delicious fried crickets>
>
> Gahan Wilson's Jiminy Cricket in a bottle cartoon.

Mad Magazine's Pinocchio stomping Jiminy Cricket
cartoon.

Olrik

unread,
Jan 4, 2010, 12:32:16 AM1/4/10
to
Le 2010-01-03 23:40, hypa...@comcast.net a �crit :

Salted & deep fried in the cheapest oil available. Man, these were some
crunchy SOBs!

;-)

Olrik

Andre Lieven

unread,
Jan 4, 2010, 1:59:40 AM1/4/10
to
On Jan 3, 7:23 pm, Olrik <olrik...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Le 2010-01-03 02:04, Andre Lieven a écrit :
>
> > On Jan 3, 1:05 am, Olrik<olrik...@yahoo.com>  wrote:
> >> Thanks for the info, but I'm stuck here in Québec, where fried chicken

> >> is KFC or nothing. It's not a traditional food here. BBQ chicken is, but
> >> no fried.
>
> > Hmm... Check out what you can find at a Loblaws. In Ottawa,
> > they often carry fried chicken at the deli counter. Ditto for
> > Great Canadian Superstore, though I doubt that they're in
> > Quebec...
>
> Yeah, we have those fried chicken pieces. They're not very good,
> though, and not as popular as the BBQ kind.

Well, local variations of quality exist. Down visiting in Florida,
we had some fried chicken from WalMart (Yeah, I know, but
down here there are maybe two supermarket chains, and
neither is really that great, V. seven chains, including two
discount chains back in Ottawa.) that was quite good, even
reheated the second time around. Six bucks for 8 pieces.

Too bad Suisse Chalet doesn't do just takeout chicken...

> >> The *only* place where you can have real fried chicken is KFC.
>
> >> And their coleslaw is to die for.
>
> > OTOH, where you are, there is smoked meat and poutine.
>
> Oh yeah! I live a stone's trow away from Schwartz's, arguably the very
> best smoked meat restaurant on the planet.

Oh heavens, this chap lives near the motherload of ambrosia, the
very food of the ascended (Cue Stargate SG-1 theme music), and
he has the audacity to complain about not having some good
food around ? Twenty lashes with a wet brisket on you, sir ! <g>

We were there in mid August. I never miss visiting Schwartz's
on any trip into Montreal. Magnifique.

> I must confess never having poutine...

I grant that it is heart attack in a dish, but yum...

Andre, formerly of the old Glenmount district of Montreal.

Masked Avenger

unread,
Jan 4, 2010, 5:50:11 AM1/4/10
to

very much the same here in Oz, except you can replace the Hotdog with a
Meat Pie ...... and even more beer .....

--
MA ....Yoiks .... and away .....

Only two things are infinite, the Universe and human stupidity
............. and I'm not sure about the Universe ..........
- A. Einstein

Does Schr�dinger's cat have 18 half lives ?

Alex W

unread,
Jan 4, 2010, 6:17:42 AM1/4/10
to

This gives me an idea .... how does cricket vindaloo sound
to you?

Robibnikoff

unread,
Jan 4, 2010, 7:07:43 AM1/4/10
to

"Alex W" <ing...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:izk1gpqnq7co.2...@40tude.net...

Hot and nasty! :)
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo & Belly Dancer Supreme
BAAWA Knight
#1557


Alex W

unread,
Jan 4, 2010, 12:00:30 PM1/4/10
to

IOW, perfect!

<BEG>

Olrik

unread,
Jan 4, 2010, 12:40:12 PM1/4/10
to
Le 2010-01-04 06:17, Alex W a �crit :
>> Salted& deep fried in the cheapest oil available. Man, these were some

>> crunchy SOBs!
>
> This gives me an idea .... how does cricket vindaloo sound
> to you?

I'll try that next cricket season!

;-)

Olrik

Alex W

unread,
Jan 4, 2010, 6:27:09 PM1/4/10
to

Patties, Four'n'Twenty ... they're all good.

If you drive home in a Holden, that is.

Alex W

unread,
Jan 4, 2010, 7:17:42 PM1/4/10
to

Double portion for the Aussies, if you please!

<BEG>

Don Martin

unread,
Jan 4, 2010, 8:33:54 PM1/4/10
to
On Mon, 4 Jan 2010 07:07:43 -0500, "Robibnikoff" <witc...@broomstick.com>
wrote:

I knew a girl like that, once . . . .


-

aa #2278 Never mind "proof." Where is your evidence?
Fidei defensor (Hon. Antipodean)
The Squeeky Wheel: http://home.comcast.net/~drdonmartin/

Don Martin

unread,
Jan 4, 2010, 8:33:54 PM1/4/10
to
On Sun, 3 Jan 2010 20:49:57 -0800 (PST), Father Haskell
<father...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>On Jan 3, 2:04�am, "Mike Painter" <md.pain...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>> Olrik wrote:

>> > Le 2010-01-02 20:01, Father Haskell a �crit :
>> >> On Jan 2, 7:58 pm, raven1<quoththera...@nevermore.com> �wrote:


>> >>> On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 09:45:44 -0500, raven1
>>

>> >>> <quoththera...@nevermore.com> �wrote:


>> >>>> On Fri, 1 Jan 2010 18:53:35 -0800 (PST), "IlBeBa...@gmail.com"

>> >>>> <ilbeba...@gmail.com> �wrote:
>>
>> >>>>> On Jan 1, 6:41 pm, Father Haskell<fatherhask...@yahoo.com> �wrote:


>> >>>>>> And prove it.
>>
>> >>>>> The answer is in Genesis 1 .
>>
>> >>>> Verse, please.
>>
>> >>> <crickets>
>>
>> >> <frozen dead crickets>
>>
>> > <delicious fried crickets>
>>
>> Gahan Wilson's Jiminy Cricket in a bottle cartoon.
>
>Mad Magazine's Pinocchio stomping Jiminy Cricket
>cartoon.

Go for the real thing--in the original novel by Carlo Callodi, the cricket was
killed on page 9, mashed flat with a mallet by Pinochio himself. Disney has
much to answer for.

It is loading more messages.
0 new messages