Sign the new Emancipation Proclamation for the preborn child

[J]

http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/video-sign-the-new-emancipation-proclamation-for-the-preborn-child








WASHINGTON, D.C., November 19, 2012, (LifeSiteNews.com) - As movie-goers
flock to see Lincoln, a pro-life ministry hopes to use his precedent to
set unborn children free.

Priests for Life, States of Refuge, and other pro-life ministries are
asking Americans to sign the Emancipation Proclamation for the Preborn
Child.

�The second Emancipation Proclamation is not to end slavery but to end
child-killing,� Pastor Rusty Thomas, Assistant Director of Operation
Save America, told LifeSiteNews.com.

The document declares �that all children, from conception forward, are
human beings. They are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable
rights, and that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of
happiness.�

Thomas said, �We�re going to put all those signatures on a scroll on
January 1, 2013� � the 150th anniversary of Abraham Lincoln�s signing
the Emancipation Proclamation.



http://www.prebornemancipation.org/












--
J Young
jdyo...@ymail.com

http://www.americandecency.org/

[Budikka666]

Thanks for once again openly admitting on Usenet that your god is
utterly worthless

Why else would you have to beg people to help you instead of simply
praying? lol!

Budikka

[•RLMEAS@teranews.com]

In article
<49a0af84-d089-4b48...@l7g2000vbj.googlegroups.com>,

• perhaps he was praying to the wrong saint?

[J]

Why are you pretending to be an atheist? Who else but a religious person
would constantly have God on their mind, as you do nearly every time you
post.

[M.I.Wakefield]

"J" wrote in message news:64b1dg....@news.alt.net...

> Why are you pretending to be an atheist? Who else but a religious person
> would constantly have God on their mind, as you do nearly every time you
> post.

Why are you pretending to be an heterosexual? Who else but a homosexual
would constantly have homosexuality on their mind, as you do nearly every
time you post.

[MarkA]

On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 13:22:00 -0800, J wrote:

> http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/video-sign-the-new-emancipation-proclamation-for-the-preborn-child
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> WASHINGTON, D.C., November 19, 2012, (LifeSiteNews.com) - As movie-goers
> flock to see Lincoln, a pro-life ministry hopes to use his precedent to
> set unborn children free.
>
>

I agree!!! Set those fetuses free of the shackles of their mother's
uterus! Let them see the fresh air and sunshine that is denied to them
for nine months! Of course, if the mother wants the child to be born
alive, she will have to keep it enslaved for a while.....

--
MarkA

If you can read this, you can stop reading now.

[elizabeth]

On Nov 19, 1:22 pm, J <jdyou...@ymail.com> wrote:

The use of the prefix, pre- with a past tense verb means "already
done" as in precooked.

What a maroon!

[Syd M.]

On Nov 19, 4:22 pm, J <jdyou...@ymail.com> wrote:
> http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/video-sign-the-new-emancipation-proc...

>
> WASHINGTON, D.C., November 19, 2012, (LifeSiteNews.com) - As movie-goers
> flock to see Lincoln, a pro-life ministry hopes to use his precedent to
> set unborn children free.
>
>

Since 'pre-born children' don't exist, he's asking for a fantasy.

PDW

[Syd M.]

On Nov 19, 5:29 pm, J <jdyou...@ymail.com> wrote:
> On 11/19/2012 2:07 PM, Budikka666 wrote:
>
> > Thanks for once again openly admitting on Usenet that your god is
> > utterly worthless
>
> > Why else would you have to beg people to help you instead of simply
> > praying?  lol!
>
> > Budikka
>
> Why are you pretending to be an atheist?

Why are you?

PDW

[Jeanne Douglas]

In article <64atf4....@news.alt.net>, J <jdyo...@ymail.com>
wrote:

> http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/video-sign-the-new-emancipation-proclamation-

> for-the-preborn-child
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> WASHINGTON, D.C., November 19, 2012, (LifeSiteNews.com) - As movie-goers
> flock to see Lincoln, a pro-life ministry hopes to use his precedent to
> set unborn children free.

Since there's no such thing as an unborn child, no need to read any
further.

--
JD

"Osama Bin Laden is dead and GM is alive."--VP Joseph Biden

[james g. keegan jr.]

In article <64atf4....@news.alt.net>, J <jdyo...@ymail.com>
wrote:

[...]

the crazies are responding badly to the usa's repudiation of their
cult-like, misogynist beliefs.

[Seth lePod]

On Nov 19, 3:29 pm, J <jdyou...@ymail.com> wrote:
> On 11/19/2012 2:07 PM, Budikka666 wrote:
>
> > Thanks for once again openly admitting on Usenet that your god is
> > utterly worthless
>
> > Why else would you have to beg people to help you instead of simply
> > praying?  lol!
>
> > Budikka

:
> Why are you pretending to be an atheist? Who else but a religious person
> would constantly have God on their mind, as you do nearly every time you
> post.

Applying that same "reasoning" to you, I'd ask why you
are pretending to be straight.



Seth
>
> --
> J Young
> jdyou...@ymail.com
>
> http://www.americandecency.org/

[duke]

On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 21:40:30 -0800 (PST), Seth lePod <v.infe...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>> Why are you pretending to be an atheist? Who else but a religious person
>> would constantly have God on their mind, as you do nearly every time you
>> post.

>Applying that same "reasoning" to you, I'd ask why you
>are pretending to be straight.

Hey, gumball, ever wonder why you never get a return comment from bud da dud de
caca?

The dukester, American - American
********************************************
You can't fix stupid.
********************************************

[Syd M.]

On Nov 20, 7:14 am, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 21:40:30 -0800 (PST), Seth lePod <v.inferna...@gmail.com>

> wrote:
>
> >> Why are you pretending to be an atheist? Who else but a religious person
> >> would constantly have God on their mind, as you do nearly every time you
> >> post.
> >Applying that same "reasoning" to you, I'd ask why you
> >are pretending to be straight.
>
> Hey, gumball, ever wonder why you never get a return comment from bud da dud de
> caca?
>
>

Because this goober is not worth her answering, asshole?

PDW

[Budikka666]

On Nov 19, 4:29 pm, J <jdyou...@ymail.com> wrote:
> Why are you pretending to be an atheist? Who else but a religious person
> would constantly have God on their mind, as you do nearly every time you
> post.

Why are you pretending you're not a woman deep inside? Who else but a
woman person would constantly have women on her mind as you do nearly
every time you post?

Budikka

[Don Martin]

Jeanne Douglas <hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
> In article <64atf4....@news.alt.net>, J <jdyo...@ymail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/video-sign-the-new-emancipation-proclamation-
>> for-the-preborn-child
>>
>> WASHINGTON, D.C., November 19, 2012, (LifeSiteNews.com) - As movie-goers
>> flock to see Lincoln, a pro-life ministry hopes to use his precedent to
>> set unborn children free.
>
> Since there's no such thing as an unborn child, no need to read any
> further.

Since there is no such thing as genuine information from LifeSiteNews,
there is no need to read further than the close parenthesis.

--
aa #2278 Never mind "proof." Where is your evidence?
BAAWA Chief Assistant to the Assistant Chief Heckler
Fidei defensor (Hon. Antipodean)
The Squeeky Wheel: http://home.comcast.net/~drdonmartin/

[elizabeth]

Whatever is posting as J seems to think now, that I am a
transexual ... which is very odd . . .. considering how I oppose the
insanity of an SF proposal to pay for sex change operations for all
residents.

Don't get me started on its main advocate, Teresa Sparks, a total
political whore . .. who has served in all sorts of appointed jobs,
with no actual ability, no training, just political payback.

We don't even have the resources to provide basic care for all who are
already qualified!

[elizabeth]

On Nov 19, 9:04 pm, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote:
> In article <64atf4.tk3.1...@news.alt.net>, J <jdyou...@ymail.com>

> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> the crazies are responding badly to the usa's repudiation of their
> cult-like, misogynist beliefs.

Well, emancipation means "you're on your own" so one could look upon
abortion as emancipation! And since we can't take care of the human
beings here now, it just shows what utter whack job these nutters are,
and we really need to put them in protective custody.

[duke]

On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 15:16:07 -0800 (PST), elizabeth <elizabet...@gmail.com>
wrote:

You are some moron.

[duke]

On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 17:52:28 -0800, Jeanne Douglas <hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com>

>Since there's no such thing as an unborn child, no need to read any
>further.

I suspect you were a rat before you were born.

[duke]

Why did your mother want a loser like you?

[Seth lePod]

On Nov 20, 5:14 am, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 21:40:30 -0800 (PST), Seth lePod <v.inferna...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>

:

> >Applying that same "reasoning" to you, I'd ask why you
> >are pretending to be straight.

:
> Hey, gumball, ever wonder why you never get a return comment from bud da dud de
> caca?

No, but I do wonder why you couldn't tell I was
addressing that to J. "I look faaaahbulous in these
shoes!" Young.


Seth

[linuxgal]

A man person?

--
Halftime at Circvs Maximvs, and the Lions lead the Christians 326-0

[hypatiab7]

On Monday, November 19, 2012 4:22:10 PM UTC-5, J wrote:
> http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/video-sign-the-new-emancipation-proclamation-for-the-preborn-child
>
> WASHINGTON, D.C., November 19, 2012, (LifeSiteNews.com) - As movie-goers
> flock to see Lincoln, a pro-life ministry hopes to use his precedent to
> set unborn children free.
>
> Priests for Life, States of Refuge, and other pro-life ministries are
> asking Americans to sign the Emancipation Proclamation for the Preborn
> Child.
>

> The second Emancipation Proclamation is not to end slavery but to end

> child-killing, Pastor Rusty Thomas, Assistant Director of Operation
> Save America, told LifeSiteNews.com.
>
> The document declares that all children, from conception forward, are

> human beings. They are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable
> rights, and that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of
> happiness.
>

> Thomas said, We're going to put all those signatures on a scroll on
> January 1, 2013 the 150th anniversary of Abraham Lincoln signing
> the Emancipation Proclamation.
>
No. Knowing you, J, you'll probably sign it 25 times under different names.

[hypatiab7]

On Tuesday, November 20, 2012 10:25:36 PM UTC-5, linuxgal wrote:
> Budikka666 wrote:
>
> > On Nov 19, 4:29 pm, J<jdyou...@ymail.com> wrote:
> >> >Why are you pretending to be an atheist? Who else but a religious person
> >> >would constantly have God on their mind, as you do nearly every time you
> >> >post.
>
> > Why are you pretending you're not a woman deep inside? Who else but a
> > woman person would constantly have women on her mind as you do nearly
> > every time you post?
>
> A man person?

The soggy body of a man with the hidden mad mind of a woman. That's J for ya.

> Halftime at Circvs Maximvs, and the Lions lead the Christians 326-0

Do the Lions chomp upon frauds like J who keeps saying that he isn't
a Christian? He is a professional liar.

[Jeanne Douglas]

In article <ii5oa8pvkjpj28uqb...@4ax.com>,

duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:

> On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 17:52:28 -0800, Jeanne Douglas <hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com>
>
> >Since there's no such thing as an unborn child, no need to read any
> >further.
>
> I suspect you were a rat before you were born.

A fetus is a rat?

[duke]

On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 18:29:04 -0800 (PST), Seth lePod <v.infe...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>On Nov 20, 5:14 am, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>> On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 21:40:30 -0800 (PST), Seth lePod <v.inferna...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>
>:
>> >Applying that same "reasoning" to you, I'd ask why you
>> >are pretending to be straight.
>
>:
>> Hey, gumball, ever wonder why you never get a return comment from bud da dud de
>> caca?
>
>
>No, but I do wonder why you couldn't tell I was
>addressing that to J. "I look faaaahbulous in these
>shoes!" Young.
>Seth

I repeat, gumball. Ever wonder why you, nor anyone else, ever gets a return

comment from bud da dud de caca?

[the man]

In article <hlwdjsd2-09EE9B...@news.giganews.com>,

Jeanne Douglas <hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:

> In article <ii5oa8pvkjpj28uqb...@4ax.com>,
> duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 17:52:28 -0800, Jeanne Douglas
> > <hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com>
> >
> > >Since there's no such thing as an unborn child, no need to read any
> > >further.
> >
> > I suspect you were a rat before you were born.
>
> A fetus is a rat?

Let's see how that "inquiry" goes in Ireland. A woman died because of
restrictions on abortion. Let's not let that happen again because a few
want to force their "religion" on everyone.,
Call off the Dogma.
Don't practice medicine w/o a license.
--
Karma ; what a concept!

[MarkA]

On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 17:47:34 -0600, duke wrote:

> On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 18:11:12 -0500, MarkA <som...@somewhere.invalid>
> wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 13:22:00 -0800, J wrote:
>>
>>> http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/video-sign-the-new-emancipation-proclamation-for-the-preborn-child
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> WASHINGTON, D.C., November 19, 2012, (LifeSiteNews.com) - As
>>> movie-goers flock to see Lincoln, a pro-life ministry hopes to use his
>>> precedent to set unborn children free.
>
>>I agree!!! Set those fetuses free of the shackles of their mother's
>>uterus! Let them see the fresh air and sunshine that is denied to them
>>for nine months! Of course, if the mother wants the child to be born
>>alive, she will have to keep it enslaved for a while.....
>
> Why did your mother want a loser like you?
>

The world needs people like me, to drag it, kicking and screaming, out of
the Dark Ages that people like you revere.

[Jay Herblock]

On Nov 19, 4:22 pm, J <jdyou...@ymail.com> wrote:
> http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/video-sign-the-new-emancipation-proc...

>
> WASHINGTON, D.C., November 19, 2012, (LifeSiteNews.com) - As movie-goers
> flock to see Lincoln, a pro-life ministry hopes to use his precedent to
> set unborn children free.
>

> Priests for Life, States of Refuge, and other pro-life ministries are
> asking Americans to sign the Emancipation Proclamation for the Preborn
> Child.
>
> The second Emancipation Proclamation is not to end slavery but to end
> child-killing, Pastor Rusty Thomas, Assistant Director of Operation
> Save America, told LifeSiteNews.com.
>
> The document declares that all children, from conception forward, are
> human beings. They are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable
> rights, and that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of
> happiness.
>
> Thomas said, We re going to put all those signatures on a scroll on

> January 1, 2013 the 150th anniversary of Abraham Lincoln s signing
> the Emancipation Proclamation.
>
> http://www.prebornemancipation.org/

>
> --
> J Young
> jdyou...@ymail.com
>
> http://www.americandecency.org/

These whacked out fundie embryologists need to keep their noses out of
other people's vulvas.
In an ideal world they would be beaten on their heads severely for
trying that.

[the man]

In article <pan.2012.11.21....@somewhere.invalid>,

thanks.

[duke]

Ah, an old diseased horse would do better than you.

[duke]

On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 02:52:42 -0800, Jeanne Douglas <hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com>
wrote:

>In article <ii5oa8pvkjpj28uqb...@4ax.com>,
> duke <duckg...@cox.net> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 17:52:28 -0800, Jeanne Douglas <hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com>
>>
>> >Since there's no such thing as an unborn child, no need to read any
>> >further.
>>
>> I suspect you were a rat before you were born.
>
>A fetus is a rat?

Sounds like it in jd's case.

[elizabeth]

On Nov 20, 3:46 pm, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 15:16:07 -0800 (PST), elizabeth <elizabethfran...@gmail.com>

> wrote:
>
> >On Nov 19, 1:22 pm, J <jdyou...@ymail.com> wrote:
>
> >The use of the prefix, pre- with a past tense verb means "already
> >done" as in precooked.
>
> >What a maroon!
>
> You are some moron.

And even Jesus says yo mama should have aborted.
Prove Jesus said otherwise.

[elizabeth]

> trying that.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

But . .but . ..beating them on the head would not work, for their
brains are already gone.

[Seth lePod]

On Nov 21, 5:45 am, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 18:29:04 -0800 (PST), Seth lePod <v.inferna...@gmail.com>

> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >On Nov 20, 5:14 am, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> >> On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 21:40:30 -0800 (PST), Seth lePod <v.inferna...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
>
> >:
> >> >Applying that same "reasoning" to you, I'd ask why you
> >> >are pretending to be straight.
>
> >:
> >> Hey, gumball, ever wonder why you never get a return comment from bud da dud de
> >> caca?
>

:
> >No, but I do wonder why you couldn't tell I was
> >addressing that to J. "I look faaaahbulous in these
> >shoes!" Young.

:

> I repeat, gumball. Ever wonder why you, nor anyone else, ever gets a return
> comment from bud da dud de caca?

Why would I wonder about that, given the fact that I
myself have received comments from Buddika which
addressed my comments to him/her?

For example, I remember one thread where we discussed,
then agreed, that "junk DNA" could be a potential
source for new genes via mutation.

So I'm guessing it's just you.


Seth



Oh, and by the way?

Budikka replies to Hammond:

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/28c162555114f42b?hl=en&dmode=source


Budikka replies to Andrew:

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.talk.creationism/msg/daed14c5c75b6552?hl=en&dmode=source



Budikka replies to J "Haven't thought about gay sex for
several minutes now" Young:

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic/msg/a42b52d41faf588c?hl=en&dmode=source



Budikka replies to guess who:

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.abortion/msg/dd2bdc1bea97a0ce?hl=en&dmode=source

[Smiler]

On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 12:51:08 -0600, duke wrote:

> On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 10:02:24 -0500, MarkA <som...@somewhere.invalid>
> wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 17:47:34 -0600, duke wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 18:11:12 -0500, MarkA <som...@somewhere.invalid>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 13:22:00 -0800, J wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/video-sign-the-new-emancipation-proclamation-for-the-preborn-child
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> WASHINGTON, D.C., November 19, 2012, (LifeSiteNews.com) - As
>>>>> movie-goers flock to see Lincoln, a pro-life ministry hopes to use
>>>>> his precedent to set unborn children free.
>>>
>>>>I agree!!! Set those fetuses free of the shackles of their mother's
>>>>uterus! Let them see the fresh air and sunshine that is denied to them
>>>>for nine months! Of course, if the mother wants the child to be born
>>>>alive, she will have to keep it enslaved for a while.....
>>>
>>> Why did your mother want a loser like you?
>
>>The world needs people like me, to drag it, kicking and screaming, out of
>>the Dark Ages that people like you revere.
>
> Ah, an old diseased horse would do better than you.

An old, diseased, whore would do better than you, dookie.

>
> The dukester, Wannabe-Christian
> ************** You can't fix puke's stupid.

--
Smiler,

The godless one. a.a.# 2279

All gods are tailored to order. They're made to

exactly fit the prejudices of their believers.

[Smiler]

He gets paid for it?

[duke]

On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 19:28:48 -0800 (PST), Seth lePod <v.infe...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>On Nov 21, 5:45 am, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>> On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 18:29:04 -0800 (PST), Seth lePod <v.inferna...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:

>> >On Nov 20, 5:14 am, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>> >> On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 21:40:30 -0800 (PST), Seth lePod <v.inferna...@gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>>
>> >:
>> >> >Applying that same "reasoning" to you, I'd ask why you
>> >> >are pretending to be straight.
>>
>> >:
>> >> Hey, gumball, ever wonder why you never get a return comment from bud da dud de
>> >> caca?

>> >No, but I do wonder why you couldn't tell I was
>> >addressing that to J. "I look faaaahbulous in these
>> >shoes!" Young.
>
>:
>> I repeat, gumball. Ever wonder why you, nor anyone else, ever gets a return
>> comment from bud da dud de caca?

>Why would I wonder about that, given the fact that I
>myself have received comments from Buddika which
>addressed my comments to him/her?

That means you're one of the very few who knows less about God than she does.
Put another way, you're no threat to her.

>For example, I remember one thread where we discussed,
>then agreed, that "junk DNA" could be a potential
>source for new genes via mutation.

See what I mean.

>So I'm guessing it's just you.
>Seth

No, you're not very observant.

[linuxgal]

They have a veritable roargasm when they see 'im.

--

[Mike Painter]

On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 19:28:48 -0800 (PST), Seth lePod
<v.infe...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>:
>> I repeat, gumball. Ever wonder why you, nor anyone else, ever gets a return
>> comment from bud da dud de caca?
>
>
>Why would I wonder about that, given the fact that I
>myself have received comments from Buddika which
>addressed my comments to him/her?
>
>For example, I remember one thread where we discussed,
>then agreed, that "junk DNA" could be a potential
>source for new genes via mutation.
>
>So I'm guessing it's just you.

I have received responses and also have a long post from Buddika that
lists many links to things Earl has run away from.
--
"When one person suffers from a delusion it is called insanity. When many people suffer from a delusion it is called religion." ~ Robert Pirsig

[Seth lePod]

On Nov 22, 5:49 am, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 19:28:48 -0800 (PST), Seth lePod <v.inferna...@gmail.com>

Why lookie here, what Dook's editor snipped off the end
of my reply to his Budikka-never-replies-to-anyone
rant:


Budikka replies to Hammond:

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/28c162555114f42b?hl=3Den&dmode=3Dsource


Budikka replies to Andrew:

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.talk.creationism/msg/daed14c5c75b6552?hl=3Den&dmode=3Dsource

Budikka replies to J "Haven't thought about gay sex for
several minutes now" Young:

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic/msg/a42b52d41faf588c?hl=3Den&dmode=3Dsource

Budikka replies to guess who:

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.abortion/msg/dd2bdc1bea97a0ce?hl=3Den&dmode=3Dsource

Must be some setting in his editor. Maybe having to do
with the length of the post? You got some kind of
length problem, there, Dookie? Something about your
length? Maybe you'd like to discuss it with us?


Seth

[duke]

On Thu, 22 Nov 2012 20:08:50 -0800 (PST), Seth lePod <v.infe...@gmail.com>
wrote:

What did you do, list 3 people? Over the last 10-15 years she has avoided a
response to hundreds to thousands of individual posts for the last 15 years or
so.

I own you, gumball.

[Budikka666]

On Nov 19, 4:29 pm, J <jdyou...@ymail.com> wrote:
> Why are you pretending to be an atheist?

Unlike worthless lowlife lying scum for Christ like you, there is no
pretence with us. What you see is what you get, and a piece of theist
trash like you is going to get it and continue getting it until we run
you out of these news groups. Live with it.

> Who else but a religious person would constantly have God on their mind

There are no gods on our mind. What's on our mind is your hatred and
lies, and your constant abuse of women and gays and your incessant
proselytizing in alt.atheism agaisnt the a.a charter.. Got that
straight now you pig-ignroant asshole? What's on our mind is exposing
Christian filth like you for the lowife that you are. You will run.
You will vacate these groups. We guarantee it. Either that or you
will be m=relelntlessly harassed every time you psot your hatred
here. You asked for it. Don't blame us

You are a misogynistic, homophobic piece of god-soaked filth and you
will be chased away like a rabid dog from the atheist groups. Count
on it.

Here's why you are a liar and a coward:
You lie there is a god, but pathetic *coward* that you are, you shrink
away like a limp Peter at the passion every single time you're asked
for evidence of this farcical bullshit god you invented for yourself.

Here's why you're a hypocrite:
Your own master, according to NT fiction, instructed you to judge not,
yet you are in our news groups judging women and gays *every* *single*
*day*.

You will be harrassed in these news groups *mercilessly* until you
cease and desist. Got that? You don't want us on your case, then
fuck off? Quit posting your proselytizing of hatred in alt.atheism.
That's you best offer. take it and run.

Here's why you're a two-time hypocrite:
Your own master, according to NT fiction, instructed you to turn the
other cheek. You have not once exhibited that trait.

Here's why you're a three-time hypocrite:
Your own master, according to NT fiction, instructed you, if you were
not listened to in your proselytizing, to shake the dust off your feet
and depart. You and your trash Christian ilk have consistently failed
to do that, so your problem, dimwit, from your own perpsective, is
that *you* don't follow your own religion.

Got that straight now you stinking shit rag?

Now fuck off.

Budikka

[Seth lePod]

On Nov 23, 9:07 am, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Nov 2012 20:08:50 -0800 (PST), Seth lePod <v.inferna...@gmail.com>

The first four I came across in about two minutes
searching.

It's just you, Bub. You're not worth trying
to debate, because you don't debate.
Debate means sticking to the point,
addressing what was said, and eschewing
diversions, insults, and non-sequiturs.
You don't do that. Budikka argues with
Andrew, because Andrew does -- for all his
pig-headed refusal to learn some actual
science -- he does in fact debate Budikka,
just as I have described.

And so Budikka does respond to him.

Try it. You might actually like it.

(but probably not)

Seth


> ********************************************

[Smiler]

On Thu, 22 Nov 2012 11:43:18 -0800, Mike Painter wrote:

> On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 19:28:48 -0800 (PST), Seth lePod
> <v.infe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>
>>> I repeat, gumball. Ever wonder why you, nor anyone else, ever gets a
>>> return comment from bud da dud de caca?
>>
>>
>>Why would I wonder about that, given the fact that I myself have received
>>comments from Buddika which addressed my comments to him/her?
>>
>>For example, I remember one thread where we discussed, then agreed, that
>>"junk DNA" could be a potential source for new genes via mutation.
>>
>>So I'm guessing it's just you.
>
>
> I have received responses and also have a long post from Buddika that
> lists many links to things Earl has run away from.

I've had a long 'conversation' with Buddika, too, regarding spider's silk.

[Budikka666]

On Nov 20, 6:14 am, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> Hey, gumball, ever wonder why you never get a return comment from bud da
dud de
> caca?

Well you've been proven a LIAR yet again, loser. Here's your record of
chronic cowardice for your clown christ. just so's everyone knows what
kind of lowlife for the lord you are:

Here's the most recent example of Duke's Shameless cowardice:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/browse_frm/
thread/916cd5f8d7d879ce?scoring=d&

Challenged to present his evidence for a creator god, he RAN AWAY!
(Again, yawn).
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/browse_frm/thread/
e8a0474ae8eb1ded?scoring=d&
9/29/2012

Challenged to a formal debate on abortion, Duke Box aborted!
http://tinyurl.com/9zgnxcb
9/9/2012

Challenged to a formal debate on the existence of Jesus, Duck & Run
Dipshit-For-Christ Duke RAN:
http://tinyurl.com/7mo8j5l
3/25/2012

In the massive slaughter of Usenet creationists, *every* *single* *one*
of whom fled because they could not post even on item of positive
scientific evidence for a creator or for a creation, Duped was merely one
of a host of creationists who RAN AWAY:
http://tinyurl.com/8yqo8fw
(3/18/2012)

Challenged to identify the two species on either side of this "missing
link" he lies exists, Dumbass Duke RAN AWAY!
http://tinyurl.com/7k2w6jc
(2/25/2012)

The Valentine's Day Massacre!
http://tinyurl.com/7mdvcep
(2/14/2012)

Duck & Run starts the new year in fine fettle - runs three times in one
day!
http://tinyurl.com/7eotebl
http://tinyurl.com/7b2waz8
http://tinyurl.com/7o23uvn

Dec 27th, 2011
Challenged to debate his 100% evidence for Jesus, Duck & Run ducked and
ran.
http://tinyurl.com/6m4ub5q

Dec 26th, 2011
Duck & Run claimed he had 100% of the evidence for a god, yet when
*given* *a* *second* *chance* to produce it, he fled the challenge!
http://tinyurl.com/7kawokn

Dec. 24th 2011
Duck & Run claimed he had 100% of the evidence for a god, yet when
challenged to produce it, he fled the challenge!
http://tinyurl.com/6m4ub5q

Sept. 5th 2011
asked for evidence for this Jesus of his. Duck & Run ducked & ran!
http://tinyurl.com/3brposl


On January 22, 2011, under the title: "Chicken Duke Has a Beautifully
Clean Pair of heels Does he Not?" We requested "Please provide
independent evidence - that is, from *outside* the Bible - that there
ever was a Jesus Christ, miracle working son of a god."
Chicken Duke couldn't do it.
http://tinyurl.com/4h6wdzm

Then there was this:
http://tinyurl.com/4dk7aoz
Jan 16, 2011, We requested this of Chicken Duke:
please provide *positive* *scientific* evidence for a creator or for a
creation, and post it right here in response to this message.
This was in response to his assertion that "Existence mandates creation".
He ran away.

http://tinyurl.com/29hkt7j
December 22nd 2010, in which Chicken Duke was challenged to support
statements he has made repeatedly on Usenet. Once again he ran from them
like the stinking diarrhea he is and hid behind an irrelevant and
dishoenst non-sequitur.

Prior to that he ran from a similar challenge just the day before(!):
He ran from a challenge to support his bullshit on December 21st, 2010:
http://tinyurl.com/29hkt7j

And just the month before that:
http://tinyurl.com/2d5xtf3

November 20th 2010, he ran form these five simple questions rather than
support his god, thereby proving that he's nothing but another limp Peter
at the passion!

Here are the questions:
1. That the figure you quoted is true.
2. That they all believe in the *same* deity.
3. That this single deity actually exists
4. That this single deity actually created the universe
5. That this single deity is not a figment of their imagination
Here's my prediction at the time:
Time to show us that clean pair of heels again, Chicken Duck & Run.
Yep - he ran!

Claimed there are "gargantuan holes" in the Theory of Evolution and then
RAN when we called him on it:
http://tinyurl.com/27kf2da

The entire "Why There Isn't a God" series, started here:
http://tinyurl.com/6b9et

Duck & Run Ran Away - that is to say he failed 100% to actually get to
grips with the subject matter in any of those threads, his 'response'
consisting solely of chanting "no it isn't" or words to that effect. He
could offer no rebuttal, let alone refutation, he could not support a
single thing he claimed and he could offer zero rationale for his
position.

Let's face it, on this basis, he's run away from the entire "Why the Holy
Bible Lies" series, the entire "Why There Was No Flood" series, and all
of the the "Issues The Anti-Choice Crowd Carefully Avoid" series so far.

Petition to Save the Hubble Telescope
Duck & Run makes yet another blind claim "Ok, you foot the bill to keep
looking at the same "sky" that's already been looked at" he blathers,
like there couldn't possibly be anything new to discover, yet we proved
him entirely wrong - again.
http://tinyurl.com/74p46nj

Scientists find new face on back of Turin shroud
http://tinyurl.com/2bx6jcf
Duck & Run, shrouded in cowardice, ran away.

The Inquisition
http://tinyurl.com/4pokf
Duck & Run didn't expect the inquisition....

Another Problem for Creation IDiots
http://tinyurl.com/3px9j
Duck & Run proved to be a creation IDiot.

Human aspect of Jesus
http://tinyurl.com/4w488
Duck and Run has provided us with a de facto admission that there was no
Jesus Christ, miracle-working son-of-a-god.

Jesus's three days sacrifice
http://tinyurl.com/3jhop
Duck & Run sacrificed the truth and got caught.

Which is the real God???
http://tinyurl.com/6bnoo
Duck & Run didn't know.

God isn't very smart about spreading his word, is he?
http://tinyurl.com/7xjux
Neither is Duck & Run.

Why did Mekkla run away from a discussion of Heb 8:7-13?
http://tinyurl.com/4v759
Duck & Run opened this thread to accuse someone else of running away. As
soon as he was challenged, Duck & Run ran away!

Why Didn't Jesus Die Sooner?
http://tinyurl.com/5gevm
Duck & Run's claims died sooner.

Why is Duke Such a Coward?
http://tinyurl.com/5p3qt
Duck & Run ran away, proving what a coward he is.

Duck & Run's five evidences of god
(that he later admitted were not evidences):
http://tinyurl.com/3otzr

Questions that Duke Can't Answer
(in which we accused Duck & Run of running away and from which he...**RAN
AWAY**! The questions remain unanswered. There are only ten numbered
questions in this thread, assembled from previous threads from which
Duck & Run ran away. Duck & Run lied there were 75 questions and...ran
away!)
http://tinyurl.com/5ozyl

There are now well over one hundred unanswered questions that Duck & Run
has fled. Here's the bulk of them:
http://tinyurl.com/ad89u
http://tinyurl.com/9ky7y

Duck & Run thinks Christianity, which post-dates Mithraism by seven
centuries, gave rise to Mithraism:
http://tinyurl.com/yzp9bk
Duck & Run ran away.

Duke: Global Flood Challenge
A thread which we opened specifically at Duck & Run's request, and from
which he, predictably, ran away. He admitted there is no evidence for a
global flood, we presented abundant evidence that there never was one,
Duck & Run offered zero rebuttal and ran away as he again did in the
recent flood series.
http://tinyurl.com/4l83y

Evidence that Duke can't refute:
http://tinyurl.com/5l2av
Duck & Run failed to refute the evidence and ran away, thereby proving my
case

An Answer to Pascal's Wager
http://tinyurl.com/4y63n
In which we accuse Duck & Run of running away. He ran away!

Thread: "Why Puke is Such a Pathological, Unregenerate, Cowardly, Lying,
Hypocritical Asshole"
http://tinyurl.com/4ant3
Duck & Run ran away because he's a pathological, unregenerate, cowardly,
lying hypocritical asshole.

Thread: "Duke's Chronic lying"
http://tinyurl.com/3ra8l
Duck & Run ran away.

Thread: "aqotm - bud(ikka) style"
http://tinyurl.com/4r4gz
Duck & Run ran away from his own clueless stupidity

Thread: "Duke: Global Flood Challenge"
http://tinyurl.com/3qd5m
Duck & Run was out of his depth - as he's recently proven again - and so
he...ran away!

Thread: "The Bland Assumption of Jesus' Existence"
http://tinyurl.com/5kj3m
Duck & Run ran away as we blandly assumed he would.

Thread: "Running Scriptural Circles Around Duke"
http://tinyurl.com/3ozwo
Duck & Run ran away after we ran scriptural circles around him

And my favorite:
http://tinyurl.com/487vc
This was a cowardly thread Duck & Run opened titled "Budikka Runs Away".
He set this up because he was peeved that he didn't get an instant
response from me in another thread! He never told me he'd opened this
alternate thread, yet he accused me of running away in it! LoL! When we
finally happened across it and challenged him in it, he ran away! How
pathetic is that?!

And more than once/month for an entire 12 month period starting April
2009:
April 21st, 2009: http://tinyurl.com/yzywu7q
July 12th, 2009: http://tinyurl.com/ybrmfxp
August 16th,2009: http://tinyurl.com/kjjmn4
September 10th, 2009: http://tinyurl.com/oasqn8
October 3rd, 2009: http://tinyurl.com/ybvtw53
November 9th, 2009: http://tinyurl.com/yjlmbrf
November 19th, 2009: http://tinyurl.com/yj64yqj
November 20th, 2009: http://tinyurl.com/ybrkvyh
November 22nd, 2009: http://tinyurl.com/ycw6s8l
November 25th, 2009: http://tinyurl.com/ygafw5d
November 29th, 2009: http://tinyurl.com/yakpje3
November 29th, 2009: http://tinyurl.com/ygafw5d
December 5th, 2009: http://tinyurl.com/yzt9f4m
December 7th, 2009: http://tinyurl.com/yllcb6q
December 8th, 2009: http://tinyurl.com/ybzvv33
December 13th, 2009: http://tinyurl.com/yakex6v
December 23rd, 2009: http://tinyurl.com/y9k8kpv
January 1st, 2010: http://tinyurl.com/ybnesb2
January 24th, 2010: http://tinyurl.com/ybsqw3l
January 27th, 2010: http://tinyurl.com/ycgm8u8
January 31st, 2010: http://tinyurl.com/ycemfpo
February 3rd, 2010: http://tinyurl.com/ybsqw3l
February 15th, 2010: http://tinyurl.com/yjjj93v
February 16th, 2010: http://tinyurl.com/ycemfpo
February 22nd, 2010: http://tinyurl.com/ye59brz
March 1st, 2010: http://tinyurl.com/ykgtezr
March 6th, 2010: http://tinyurl.com/yjhe3fe
March 9th, 2010: http://tinyurl.com/ybnahkb
March 11th, 2010: http://tinyurl.com/yl8hcea

The best comment from him was in alt.atheism on January 5th, 2004, at
5:46 pm when he said, "I've heard myself say a lot of vocal things, but
I've never heard myself think." (http://tinyurl.com/f48bq). This
explains everything, including why he's such a gashole. All he can do is
impotently snipe at people, since he has nothing of value or intelligence
to say and he demonstrably cannot support a single claim he makes.

He has no proof, no evidence - not even an intelligent argument. He does
not think because he cannot. He's quite loco, and like a loco, he's
stuck on a pair of narrow rails. He has no clue he's on them, let alone
how to get off. And the track to which he's limited leads to a dead end
- which he hilariously thinks is "Heaven"!

The best "evidence" of a god he was ever capable of producing was a
lackluster five items he posted in thread "Scientists find new face on
back of Turin shroud" in a.a. on April 18 2004, 9:52 am:
http://tinyurl.com/c6hkg.

He appears to have appropriated "his" five evidences from Thomas Aquinas
who, c1245, published "Summa theologiae" which contained five "Ways" to
"prove" some god's existence, all of which have been thoroughly
discredited.

He admitted his "own" five ways were nothing but blind belief in alt
atheism in a thread called "The Inquisition" message posted on Saturday,
12 June, 2004 11:52am:
http://tinyurl.com/bc5ud
but that was all he could do after the massive pounding he got.

We used those same five items in a spoof edition of my "Why There is no
God" series (http://tinyurl.com/bz54w). We changed a word here and there
and all of his five "evidences" miraculously became evidence for the non-
existence of a god! Naturally we didn't count them in the 666 since they
were so pathetic.

His comments aren't born of smarts, logic, rational or evidence, they're
born of desperation. Neither are his comments aimed at the material -
they rarely are. He's incapable of having a rational exchange on a
topic. He spits out idiocy and insult and runs away.

His comments are not designed to enlighten, help, or exchange anything,
but to abuse people. He's the very antithesis of this purported
Christian love he's supposed to dispense.

He never documents or supports a single thing he says, whereas the
cowardice and lies of this pathetic hypocrite for Christ have been fully
documented on Usenet. His despicable behavior and his slanderous
unfounded charges (he thinks turning the other cheek means mooning
someone) are why he was mass-plonked by pretty near the entire regular
set on a.a.:
http://tinyurl.com/9gycg

It's a sign of how pathetic he is, how low he's sinking and how desperate
he's become since he was cut off, that he now has to beg for atheists to
talk to him by posting inane rants against us - this from the guy who
claims to be a Christian, who claims to do unto others as he would be
done by, and who lies about turning the other cheek!

His cowardice in "debate" or even discussion is legendary:
1. http://tinyurl.com/ac2vg
2. http://tinyurl.com/4dyok
3. http://tinyurl.com/664yu
4. http://tinyurl.com/apenc

He thinks Christianity, which post-dates Mithraism by seven centuries,
gave rise to Mithraism:
http://tinyurl.com/yzp9bk

He's quite literally astronomically stupid:
http://tinyurl.com/yhyopg
("the same "sky" that's already been looked at."!)
http://tinyurl.com/6fbwqh

He claims he can run rings around anyone on scripture, but when he was
actually taken up directly on this claim:
http://tinyurl.com/3z47u
he ran away!

He has numerous documented lies:
http://tinyurl.com/5zlzx
http://tinyurl.com/ablwm

He regularly demands people open discussions on his god, and when they
do, he runs away. We personally had him run from the *same topic* well
over 100 times in direct response to a challenge *he* made!

He dismally failed the simplest intelligence test imaginable:
http://tinyurl.com/7zm43

He has fifty questions he can't answer or daren't answer honestly here:
http://tinyurl.com/ad89u (October 22nd 2004)

and fifty more here:
http://tinyurl.com/9ky7y (July 16th 2005)

In short, he's a waste of a human being and not worth any response other
than this.

End of Douche. Case closed.

Budikka

[duke]

On Thu, 22 Nov 2012 03:38:18 +0000, Smiler <Youm...@JoeKing.com> wrote:

>On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 12:51:08 -0600, duke wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 10:02:24 -0500, MarkA <som...@somewhere.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 17:47:34 -0600, duke wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 18:11:12 -0500, MarkA <som...@somewhere.invalid>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 13:22:00 -0800, J wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/video-sign-the-new-emancipation-proclamation-for-the-preborn-child
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> WASHINGTON, D.C., November 19, 2012, (LifeSiteNews.com) - As
>>>>>> movie-goers flock to see Lincoln, a pro-life ministry hopes to use
>>>>>> his precedent to set unborn children free.
>>>>
>>>>>I agree!!! Set those fetuses free of the shackles of their mother's
>>>>>uterus! Let them see the fresh air and sunshine that is denied to them
>>>>>for nine months! Of course, if the mother wants the child to be born
>>>>>alive, she will have to keep it enslaved for a while.....
>>>>
>>>> Why did your mother want a loser like you?
>>
>>>The world needs people like me, to drag it, kicking and screaming, out of
>>>the Dark Ages that people like you revere.
>>
>> Ah, an old diseased horse would do better than you.
>
>An old, diseased, whore would do better than you, dookie.

Yes, I'm not for sale to you.

[duke]

On Fri, 23 Nov 2012 08:53:25 -0800 (PST), Seth lePod <v.infe...@gmail.com>
wrote:

No, it's not just me. She responded to me also, and kill filed me 4 times, no
less. It's no fun when she gets return comments. She shows her ass when
challenged. So she doesn't.

[Seth lePod]

On Nov 24, 6:03 am, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Nov 2012 08:53:25 -0800 (PST), Seth lePod <v.inferna...@gmail.com>

Oh? OK, I tell you what then: week after next --
I'm waaay too busy this week -- week after next
I shall invite the two of you to an actual formal
debate, right here on the newsgroup. You
will both actually debate, and any name-calling,
attempted deflections, refusal to stick to the point,
or other five-year old behavior by either of you wlll
get you called on it. By me. And by anyone else
interested in following the debate.

Deal?

If so, start proposing some topics that both
of you will mutually be interested in. I'm
a bit stuck on that one right now.

Seth

[Aldo Morow]

On Nov 24, 8:03 am, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:


Is Budikka she or he? That would be PUSSIKKA THEN

[Jeanne Douglas]

In article
<203845b9-0174-4f10...@q5g2000vbp.googlegroups.com>,

Aldo Morow <kolw...@astromail.com> wrote:

> On Nov 24, 8:03 am, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>
>
> Is Budikka she or he? That would be PUSSIKKA THEN

Why?

--
JD

"Osama Bin Laden is dead and GM is alive."--VP Joseph Biden

[Budikka666]

On Nov 24, 7:03 am, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> No, it's not just me.

So how come you've *never* condemned J Young for his Christian hatred
and abuse?

>  She responded to me also, and kill filed me 4 times,

Where's your evidence for that? During the entire time you were
spewing your inane lie that you were killfiled, you were
simultaneously being chased out of every thread you posted your
hypocritical Christian trash in! LOL! Don't mistake ignoring a pile
of trash in the gutter for killfiling, you insanely guliible,
pathologically lying, hypocritical, vacuous, cowardly pile of
festering horseshit.

Below is my documentation for my assertions. Where's yours that you
were killfiled? My prediction: you have none because you never were,
and this is yet another in a long line of juvenile LIES you've spewed
in the news groups.

Here's an abridged list of threads in which we've posed serious
questions about his position and from which he has run like diarrhea.

Here's the most recent example of Duke's Shameless cowardice:

the non-existence of a god! Naturally we didn't count them in the 666

[Budikka666]

Count me in, but since I've tried this numerous times only to see him
start name-calling and run away, good luck with that plan! lol!

> If so, start proposing some topics that both
> of you will mutually be interested in.  I'm
> a bit stuck on that one right now.

Here's one he's guaranteed to flee: What objective independent
evidence does he have for this god of his?

Budikka

[Smiler]

On Sat, 24 Nov 2012 09:33:51 -0800, Aldo Morow wrote:

> On Nov 24, 8:03�am, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>
>
> Is Budikka she or he?

Google is your friend.

[Mike Painter]

On Sat, 24 Nov 2012 16:48:25 -0800 (PST), Budikka666
<budi...@netscape.net> wrote:

>
>He appears to have appropriated "his" five evidences from Thomas
>Aquinas who, c1245, published "Summa theologiae" which contained five
>"Ways" to "prove" some god's existence, all of which have been
>thoroughly discredited.

Yes, those "proofs" are usually taught in Catechism class by rote.
The nuns or priests who deliver this information never seem to present
the rest of the story.

[Malcolm McMahon]

On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 13:22:00 -0800, J wrote:

> http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/video-sign-the-new-emancipation-
proclamation-for-the-preborn-child
>
> WASHINGTON, D.C., November 19, 2012, (LifeSiteNews.com) - As movie-goers
> flock to see Lincoln, a pro-life ministry hopes to use his precedent to
> set unborn children free.
>
>

Free? They'd die immediately.

Even children are generally destroyed by freedom.

[duke]

On Sat, 24 Nov 2012 16:34:36 -0800, Jeanne Douglas <hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com>
wrote:

>In article
><203845b9-0174-4f10...@q5g2000vbp.googlegroups.com>,
> Aldo Morow <kolw...@astromail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Nov 24, 8:03 am, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Is Budikka she or he? That would be PUSSIKKA THEN
>
>Why?

Haahaahaa. Clueless.

[Budikka666]

On Nov 25, 8:45 am, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Nov 2012 16:34:36 -0800, Jeanne Douglas <hlwdj...@NOSPAMgmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >In article
> ><203845b9-0174-4f10-a862-dcedab52d...@q5g2000vbp.googlegroups.com>,

> > Aldo Morow <kolwe...@astromail.com> wrote:
>
> >> On Nov 24, 8:03 am, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>
> >> Is Budikka she or he? That would be PUSSIKKA THEN
>
> >Why?
>
> Haahaahaa.  Clueless.

Indeed you are, but you have now run out of excuses. I've accepted
Seth lePod's offer of a formal debate with you under his (or her)
rules.

Do you accept it or are you going to run as you have done countless
times before from us, a representive sample of which have been
documented elsewhere?

Budikka

[Fred^44]

Budikka666 <budi...@netscape.net> wrote:

>On Nov 24, 7:03=A0am, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>> No, it's not just me.
>So how come you've *never* condemned J Young for his Christian hatred and abuse?

Because 90% of Christianity and 100% of Islam share J's filthy ideologies.

[Fred^44]

Mike Painter <mddotp...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>On Sat, 24 Nov 2012 16:48:25 -0800 (PST), Budikka666
><budi...@netscape.net> wrote:
>>He appears to have appropriated "his" five evidences from Thomas
>>Aquinas who, c1245, published "Summa theologiae" which contained five
>>"Ways" to "prove" some god's existence, all of which have been
>>thoroughly discredited.
>Yes, those "proofs" are usually taught in Catechism class by rote.
>The nuns or priests who deliver this information never seem to present
>the rest of the story.

-heh- In their defense, few (if any) nuns actually believe that there is
evidence that any of their gods exist. Nuns have pretty much moved beyond
the idiot belief stage and get in to the profession in an effort to help
other humans.

[duke]

On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 12:14:40 -0800 (PST), elizabeth <elizabet...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>On Nov 20, 3:46 pm, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>> On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 15:16:07 -0800 (PST), elizabeth <elizabethfran...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >On Nov 19, 1:22 pm, J <jdyou...@ymail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >The use of the prefix, pre- with a past tense verb means "already
>> >done" as in precooked.
>>
>> >What a maroon!
>>
>> You are some moron.
>
>And even Jesus says yo mama should have aborted.
>Prove Jesus said otherwise.

Yo mammy delivered you.

[Father Haskell]

On Nov 25, 6:43 am, Malcolm McMahon <malc...@theriomorph.me.uk> wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 13:22:00 -0800, J wrote:
> >http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/video-sign-the-new-emancipation-
>
> proclamation-for-the-preborn-child
>
>
>
> > WASHINGTON, D.C., November 19, 2012, (LifeSiteNews.com) - As movie-goers
> > flock to see Lincoln, a pro-life ministry hopes to use his precedent to
> > set unborn children free.
>
> Free? They'd die immediately.

Only if you cut the cord. Want the honor?

[duke]

No, they've stayed well ahead of you.

[Syd M.]

On Nov 25, 5:18 pm, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:

> On Sun, 25 Nov 2012 17:33:06 GMT, repo...@scientology.org (Fred^44) wrote:
> >Mike Painter <mddotpain...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> >>On Sat, 24 Nov 2012 16:48:25 -0800 (PST), Budikka666
> >><budik...@netscape.net> wrote:
> >>>He appears to have appropriated "his" five evidences from Thomas
> >>>Aquinas who, c1245, published "Summa theologiae" which contained five
> >>>"Ways" to "prove" some god's existence, all of which have been
> >>>thoroughly discredited.
> >>Yes, those "proofs" are usually taught in Catechism class by rote.
> >>The nuns or priests who deliver this information never seem to present
> >>the rest of the story.
>
> >-heh- In their defense, few (if any) nuns actually believe that there is
> >evidence that any of their gods exist. Nuns have pretty much moved beyond
> >the idiot belief stage and get in to the profession in an effort to help
> >other humans.
>
> No, they've stayed well ahead of you.
>
>

No, just YOU.

PDW

[Budikka666]

Still running, I see. Why is that no surprise? But hey, thanks for
once again proving to everyone here what a flaming hypocrite you are
in trying to harass us in to following your fiction when you yourself
have ZERO faith in your supposedly omnipotent god's ability to help
you find tyhe guts to face me! lol!

Budikka

[Andrew]

"Budikka666" wrote in message news:4686ba36-b046-41ce...@u9g2000vbm.googlegroups.com...

It is obvious that you are a very unhappy person.

Why? Does anyone know?

Thanks.

[Budikka666]

Coward-For-Christ™ Andrew-a-Blank's most recent denials of his creator
god:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/browse_frm/thread/cbe97ddc53be5a00?scoring=d&
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/browse_frm/thread/59b246e0c8e3e4f9?scoring=d&

Coward-For-Christ™ Andrew-a-Blank Ran from challenges in SIX THREADS
simultaneously:
http://tinyurl.com/8cpp6ru
https://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/browse_frm/thread/e8da88e0f6b5a76b?hl=en&scoring=d&
Given the chance to stand up for his god and formally debate the
authenticity of the "Shroud of Turin", Creationist Coward-For-Christ™
Andrew-a-Blank openly admitted that he could not support his LIES by
turning tail and running like the rank coward that he is, thereby
proving that he has ZERO FAITH in his worthless and fictitious god.
If there were an omnipotent creator god, and this loser actually *had*
any faith, he would have trusted that god to support him and he would
have taken me up on my debate offer.

http://tinyurl.com/9rm86aj
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/browse_frm/thread/245ef4c4f9f8933b?scoring=d&
Given the chance to stand up for his god and formally debate the
existence of Jesus Christ, miracle-working son of a god, Creationist
Coward-For-Christ™ Andrew-a-Blank openly admitted that he could not
support his LIES by turning
tail and running like the rank coward that he is, thereby proving that
he has ZERO FAITH in his worthless and fictitious god. If there were
an omnipotent creator god, and this loser actually *had* any faith, he
would have trusted that god to support him and he would have taken me
up on my debate offer.

http://tinyurl.com/8o3wsmg
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/browse_frm/thread/ec1a84272b3493f1?scoring=d&
Given the chance to stand up for his god and formally debate the
Noahic flood, Creationist Coward-For-Christ™ Andrew-a-Blank openly
admitted that he could not support his LIES by turning tail and
running like the rank coward that he is, thereby proving that he has
ZERO FAITH in his worthless and fictitious god. If there were an
omnipotent creator god, and this loser actually *had* any faith, he
would have trusted that god to support him and he would have taken me
up on my debate offer.

http://tinyurl.com/9hpgy2v
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/browse_frm/thread/db798efe8d1d0c97?scoring=d&
Given the chance to stand up for his god and present scientific
evidence in support of many wild claims he had made, Creationist
Coward-For-Christ™ Andrew-a-Blank openly admitted that he could not
support his LIES by turning tail and running like the rank coward that
he is, thereby proving that he has ZERO FAITH in his worthless and
fictitious god. If there were an omnipotent creator god, and this
loser actually *had* any faith, he would have trusted that god to
support him and he would have taken me up on my debate offer.

http://tinyurl.com/986crjk
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/browse_frm/thread/fb6771658c489b66?scoring=d&
Given the chance to stand up for his god and formally debate ENCODE's
latest data, Creationist Coward-For-Christ™ Andrew-a-Blank openly
admitted that he could not support his LIES by turning tail and
running like the rank coward that he is, thereby proving that he has
ZERO FAITH in his worthless and fictitious god. If there were an
omnipotent creator god, and this loser actually *had* any faith, he
would have trusted that god to support him and he would have taken me
up on my debate offer.

http://tinyurl.com/ckeaadm
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/browse_frm/thread/c786b453f00abb9a?scoring=d&
Given the chance to stand up for his god and formally debate his 8
unsupported claims about information, Creationist Coward-For-Christ™
Andrew-a-Blank openly admitted that he could not support his LIES by
turning tail and running like the rank coward that he is, thereby
proving that he has ZERO FAITH in his worthless and fictitious god.
If there were an omnipotent creator god, and this loser actually *had*
any faith, he would have trusted that god to support him and he would
have taken me up on my debate offer.
So now you know the truth about Andrew-a-Blank - even *he* does not
truly believe in this god he espouses!
End of story.

Coward-For-Christ™ Andrew-a-Blank Ran from a simple question in
*another* SIX THREADS simultaneously:
http://tinyurl.com/7zghp7o
http://tinyurl.com/76a8chm
http://tinyurl.com/6q3q498
http://tinyurl.com/6n2swsr
http://tinyurl.com/7rvtlyu
http://tinyurl.com/7x4m3fv

Coward-For-Christ™ Andrew-a-Blank Ran from a debate on DNA in *yet
another* TEN THREADS simultaneously:
http://tinyurl.com/7zcuwsb
http://tinyurl.com/7t47anq
http://tinyurl.com/7wvegqc
http://tinyurl.com/6rg67wc
http://tinyurl.com/8yqo8fw
http://tinyurl.com/77bopo8
http://tinyurl.com/86zwhj6
http://tinyurl.com/7zlzxtd
http://tinyurl.com/7eknx73
http://tinyurl.com/6lgcwpq

Coward-For-Christ™ Andrew-a-Blank denies Christ thrice:
http://tinyurl.com/7x9c5wn
http://tinyurl.com/74h455e
http://tinyurl.com/7kl4hc7

Coward-For-Christ™ Andrew-a-Blank ran from debate:
https://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/msg/7dd8ed410470f4c2?hl=en
https://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/browse_frm/thread/e8da88e0f6b5a76b?hl=en&scoring=d&
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/browse_frm/thread/245ef4c4f9f8933b?scoring=d&
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/browse_frm/thread/e9b89ac33e01ce5b?scoring=d&
https://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/browse_frm/thread/836bea1f79468d9b?hl=en&scoring=d&
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/browse_frm/thread/728ceae4eb1d55e3?scoring=d&
https://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/browse_frm/thread/3a31410d460b908e?hl=en&scoring=d&

Budikka

[Ralph]

Dealing with a moron such as you on a daily basis will make one unhappy.

[Andrew]

"Ralph" wrote in message news:MZGdnfxlAMr7DyvN...@giganews.com...
> Andrew wrote:

>> "Budikka666" wrote:
>>> Still running, I see. Why is that no surprise? But hey, thanks for
>>> once again proving to everyone here what a flaming hypocrite you are
>>> in trying to harass us in to following your fiction when you yourself
>>> have ZERO faith in your supposedly omnipotent god's ability to help
>>> you find tyhe guts to face me! lol!
>>>
>>> Budikka
>>
>> It is obvious that you are a very unhappy person.
>>
>> Why? Does anyone know?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>>
> Dealing with a moron such as you on
> a daily basis will make one unhappy.

No, I think she is unhappy because she knows
she is fighting against the truth. Those who are
on a crusade to fight against the truth are noted
to be very unhappy.

[Virgil]

In article <6rCdnQb9a_dLEivN...@earthlink.com>,

"Andrew" <andrew....@usa.net> wrote:

> "Budikka666" wrote in message
> news:4686ba36-b046-41ce...@u9g2000vbm.googlegroups.com...
> > Still running, I see. Why is that no surprise? But hey, thanks for
> > once again proving to everyone here what a flaming hypocrite you are
> > in trying to harass us in to following your fiction when you yourself
> > have ZERO faith in your supposedly omnipotent god's ability to help

> > you find the guts to face me! lol!

> >
> > Budikka
>
> It is obvious that you are a very unhappy person.

She strikes me as someone who is having a ball picking apart the
idiocies of others.
--

[Devils Advocaat]

On Nov 28, 10:50 pm, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> In article <6rCdnQb9a_dLEivNnZ2dnUVZ_jidn...@earthlink.com>,

It could be done with a little more decorum.

If I recall correctly theists have complained about the abuse they get
from atheists.

This behaviour on Budikka's part only lends credence to their claims.

[Ken]

Andrew wouldn't know "truth" even if it was soaked in kerosene, lit
afire and shoved up his dumb fundy ass!

[Smiler]

On Wed, 28 Nov 2012 14:50:11 -0800, Andrew wrote:

> "Ralph" wrote in message
> news:MZGdnfxlAMr7DyvN...@giganews.com...
>> Andrew wrote:
>>> "Budikka666" wrote:
>>>> Still running, I see. Why is that no surprise? But hey, thanks for
>>>> once again proving to everyone here what a flaming hypocrite you are
>>>> in trying to harass us in to following your fiction when you yourself
>>>> have ZERO faith in your supposedly omnipotent god's ability to help
>>>> you find tyhe guts to face me! lol!
>>>>
>>>> Budikka
>>>
>>> It is obvious that you are a very unhappy person.
>>>
>>> Why? Does anyone know?
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>>
>> Dealing with a moron such as you on
>> a daily basis will make one unhappy.
>
>
> No, I think

Lie. There's no evidence of you 'thinking' anything, Andrew.

> she is unhappy because she knows she is fighting against the
> truth.

Where did you qualify as a mindreader?

[Ralph]

Mmm... just the opposite with me. I have never been happier now that I
am free of ignorance and stupidity required for religious belief.

[duke]

A natural born loser, she is.

[duke]

She is a traditional non-responder. Better left alone.

[duke]

But then when you die, you're become very unhappy for a long, long time, a time
so long that it's referred to as eternity.

[Ken]

Puke, AmeriKKKan - AmeriKKKan, living proof you can't fix ball-on-a-
string stupid

[Smiler]

Not according to John 3:16.

>
> The dukester, Wannabe-Christian
> ********************* You can't fix puke's stupid.

[Jeanne Douglas]

In article <ilkeb8dtp2k3vif3o...@4ax.com>,

And there's that empty threat again, tyhe one that proves that you know
you've lost the argument.

Listen, you KNOW there is only one way to convince us so why don't you
give us what we need?

--
JD

"Osama Bin Laden is dead and GM is alive."--VP Joseph Biden

[Yap]

On Nov 21, 7:46 am, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 17:52:28 -0800, Jeanne Douglas <hlwdj...@NOSPAMgmail.com>
>
> >Since there's no such thing as an unborn child, no need to read any
> >further.
>
> I suspect you were a rat before you were born.

Since when old duke believes in Buddhism, where incarnation is one of
their dogma?

[Yap]

On Nov 24, 12:07 am, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Nov 2012 20:08:50 -0800 (PST), Seth lePod <v.inferna...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >On Nov 22, 5:49 am, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> >> On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 19:28:48 -0800 (PST), Seth lePod <v.inferna...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >On Nov 21, 5:45 am, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> >> >> On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 18:29:04 -0800 (PST), Seth lePod <v.inferna...@gmail.com>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >On Nov 20, 5:14 am, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> >> >> >> On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 21:40:30 -0800 (PST), Seth lePod <v.inferna...@gmail.com>
> >> >> >> wrote:
>
> >> >> >:
> >> >> >> >Applying that same "reasoning" to you, I'd ask why you
> >> >> >> >are pretending to be straight.
>
> >> >> >:
> >> >> >> Hey, gumball, ever wonder why you never get a return comment from bud da dud de
> >> >> >> caca?
> >> >> >No, but I do wonder why you couldn't tell I was
> >> >> >addressing that to J. "I look faaaahbulous in these
> >> >> >shoes!" Young.
>
> >> >:
> >> >> I repeat, gumball. Ever wonder why you, nor anyone else, ever gets a return
> >> >> comment from bud da dud de caca?
> >> >Why would I wonder about that, given the fact that I
> >> >myself have received comments from Buddika which
> >> >addressed my comments to him/her?
>
> >> That means you're one of the very few who knows less about God than she does.
> >> Put another way, you're no threat to her.
>
> >> >For example, I remember one thread where we discussed,
> >> >then agreed, that "junk DNA" could be a potential
> >> >source for new genes via mutation.
>
> >> See what I mean.
>
> >> >So I'm guessing it's just you.
> >> >Seth
>
> >:
> >> No, you're not very observant.
>
> >Why lookie here, what Dook's editor snipped off the end
> >of my reply to his Budikka-never-replies-to-anyone
> >rant:
>
> What did you do, list 3 people?  Over the last 10-15 years she has avoided a
> response to hundreds to thousands of individual posts for the last 15 years or
> so.

Budikka doesn't simply reply to suckers like you.
Of course you love h/her sensible hard talk, striking your thick skull
with great intensity...

>
> I own you, gumball.

[Yap]

On Nov 24, 11:37 pm, Seth lePod <v.inferna...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Nov 24, 6:03 am, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Fri, 23 Nov 2012 08:53:25 -0800 (PST), Seth lePod <v.inferna...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:

> > >The first four I came across in about two minutes
> > >searching.
> > >It's just you, Bub.  You're not worth trying
> > >to debate, because you don't debate.
>
> :
>
> > No, it's not just me.  She responded to me also, and kill filed me 4 times, no
> > less.   It's no fun when she gets return comments.  She shows her ass when
> > challenged.  So she doesn't.
>
> Oh?  OK, I tell you what then: week after next --
> I'm waaay too busy this week -- week after next
> I shall invite the two of you to an actual formal
> debate, right here on the newsgroup.  You
> will both actually debate, and any name-calling,
> attempted deflections, refusal to stick to the point,
> or other five-year old behavior by either of you wlll
> get you called on it.  By me.  And by anyone else
> interested in following the debate.
>
> Deal?
>
> If so, start proposing some topics that both
> of you will mutually be interested in.  I'm
> a bit stuck on that one right now.

Nay, duke will be very afraid of any challenge.
His uneducated background is not equipped to do debate.

>
> Seth

[Yap]

On Nov 29, 6:29 am, "Andrew" <andrew.321re...@usa.net> wrote:
> "Budikka666" wrote in messagenews:4686ba36-b046-41ce...@u9g2000vbm.googlegroups.com...

> > Still running, I see.  Why is that no surprise?  But hey, thanks for
> > once again proving to everyone here what a flaming hypocrite you are
> > in trying to harass us in to following your fiction when you yourself
> > have ZERO faith in your supposedly omnipotent god's ability to help
> > you find tyhe guts to face me!  lol!
>
> > Budikka
>
> It is obvious that you are a very unhappy person.

Why should s/he be unhappy?
She is not stressed like you every day looking up the sky where there
is never a shadow of pixie?

[Yap]

On Nov 29, 6:50 am, "Andrew" <andrew.321re...@usa.net> wrote:
> "Ralph"  wrote in messagenews:MZGdnfxlAMr7DyvN...@giganews.com...

Hey, what truth?

Like the truth that a dead human in ancient time can be a pixie in the
sky, doing practically nothing for millennium upon millennium?

[Yap]

On Nov 29, 8:17 pm, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Nov 2012 14:29:32 -0800, "Andrew" <andrew.321re...@usa.net> wrote:
> >"Budikka666" wrote in messagenews:4686ba36-b046-41ce...@u9g2000vbm.googlegroups.com...

> >> Still running, I see.  Why is that no surprise?  But hey, thanks for
> >> once again proving to everyone here what a flaming hypocrite you are
> >> in trying to harass us in to following your fiction when you yourself
> >> have ZERO faith in your supposedly omnipotent god's ability to help
> >> you find tyhe guts to face me!  lol!
> >> Budikka
> >It is obvious that you are a very unhappy person.
> >Why? Does anyone know?
> >Thanks.
>
> A natural born loser, she is.

Just as truth in religion means untruth, you word loser in your looney
context is winner.

Thanks for complimenting Budikka as a champion winner !

[Yap]

On Nov 29, 8:19 pm, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:

> On Wed, 28 Nov 2012 20:22:34 -0500, Ralph <mmman...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >On 11/28/2012 5:50 PM, Andrew wrote:

> >> "Ralph"  wrote in messagenews:MZGdnfxlAMr7DyvN...@giganews.com...

> >>>   Andrew wrote:
> >>>> "Budikka666" wrote:
> >>>>> Still running, I see.  Why is that no surprise?  But hey, thanks for
> >>>>> once again proving to everyone here what a flaming hypocrite you are
> >>>>> in trying to harass us in to following your fiction when you yourself
> >>>>> have ZERO faith in your supposedly omnipotent god's ability to help
> >>>>> you find tyhe guts to face me!  lol!
>
> >>>>> Budikka
> >>>> It is obvious that you are a very unhappy person.
>
> >>>> Why? Does anyone know?
>
> >>>> Thanks.
>
> >>> Dealing with a moron such as you on
> >>> a daily basis will make one unhappy.
>
> >> No, I think she is unhappy because she knows
> >> she is fighting against the truth. Those who are
> >> on a crusade to fight against the truth are noted
> >> to be very unhappy.
> >Mmm... just the opposite with me. I have never been  happier now that I
> >am free of ignorance and stupidity required for religious belief.
>
> But then when you die, you're become very unhappy for a long, long time, a time
> so long that it's referred to as eternity.

He has only one life time, that is now.
He therefore is certainly living through a happy life, unlike you
suckers in stressful human lives and in non-existing eternal time.

[Andrew]

"Yap" wrote in message news:3e318cd2-a9f2-46a7...@v6g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...
"Andrew" wrote:

> "Ralph" wrote:
> > Andrew wrote:
> >> "Budikka666" wrote:
> >>> Still running, I see. Why is that no surprise? But hey, thanks for
> >>> once again proving to everyone here what a flaming hypocrite you are
> >>> in trying to harass us in to following your fiction when you yourself
> >>> have ZERO faith in your supposedly omnipotent god's ability to help
> >>> you find tyhe guts to face me! lol!
>
> >>> Budikka
>
> >> It is obvious that you are a very unhappy person.
>
> >> Why? Does anyone know?
>
> >> Thanks.
>
> > Dealing with a moron such as you on
> > a daily basis will make one unhappy.
>
> No, I think she is unhappy because she knows
> she is fighting against the truth. Those who are
> on a crusade to fight against the truth are noted
> to be very unhappy.

-
- Hey, what truth?

In her case, the truth about the Creator and the
Creation. If you will notice, she has had a case
of chronic obsession with the Creator for many
years.

[Andrew]

"Yap" wrote in message news:a350299f-39c8-4beb...@m4g2000pbd.googlegroups.com...
"Andrew" wrote:

> "Budikka666" wrote:
> > Still running, I see. Why is that no surprise? But hey, thanks for
> > once again proving to everyone here what a flaming hypocrite you are
> > in trying to harass us in to following your fiction when you yourself
> > have ZERO faith in your supposedly omnipotent god's ability to help
> > you find tyhe guts to face me! lol!
>
> > Budikka
>
> It is obvious that you are a very unhappy person.

-
- Why should s/he be unhappy?

Perhaps she doesn't know about
Jesus, the One who loves her.

[Jeanne Douglas]

In article <BvCdnYUFmLK8giXN...@earthlink.com>,

How would that make her unhappy?

[Andrew]

"Jeanne Douglas" wrote in message news:hlwdjsd2-A82372...@news.giganews.com...
> "Andrew" wrote:

>> "Yap" wrote:
>> "Andrew" wrote:
>> > "Budikka666" wrote:
>> > > Still running, I see. Why is that no surprise? But hey, thanks for
>> > > once again proving to everyone here what a flaming hypocrite you are
>> > > in trying to harass us in to following your fiction when you yourself
>> > > have ZERO faith in your supposedly omnipotent god's ability to help
>> > > you find tyhe guts to face me! lol!
>> >
>> > > Budikka
>> >
>> > It is obvious that you are a very unhappy person.
>> -
>> - Why should s/he be unhappy?
>>
>> Perhaps she doesn't know about
>> Jesus, the One who loves her.
>
> How would that make her unhappy?

Because if she is burdened with a load
of sin, Jesus is the only One who can
take away her guilt, and give her true
freedom - and peace to her troubled
soul.

[Devils Advocaat]

On Nov 28, 10:29 pm, "Andrew" <andrew.321re...@usa.net> wrote:
> "Budikka666" wrote in messagenews:4686ba36-b046-41ce...@u9g2000vbm.googlegroups.com...

> > Still running, I see.  Why is that no surprise?  But hey, thanks for
> > once again proving to everyone here what a flaming hypocrite you are
> > in trying to harass us in to following your fiction when you yourself
> > have ZERO faith in your supposedly omnipotent god's ability to help
> > you find tyhe guts to face me!  lol!
>
> > Budikka
>
> It is obvious that you are a very unhappy person.
>

> Why? Does anyone know?
>
> Thanks.

Budikka isn't unhappy, but certainly appears to be angry.

Budikka regularly tries to engage the theists in debate.

Budikka demands evidence for their faith and belief.

Knowing full well faith and belief require no evidence.

Budikka then gets angry and vents that anger on the theists.

As far as I can see, it's a pointless and futile exercise.

I used to read Budikka's posts with interest at one time.

Now I rarely do so, because they no longer go anywhere.

[Jeanne Douglas]

In article <tIudnQEJCIDS2iXN...@earthlink.com>,

If she doesn't believe in your god, she can't be burdened with sin
because sin is a religious concept that doesn't apply to those outside
the religion.

In other words, bzzzzt, wrong answer, try again.

[Silen...@hotmail.com]

On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 23:36:04 -0800 (PST), Devils Advocaat
<manky...@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Nov 28, 10:29�pm, "Andrew" <andrew.321re...@usa.net> wrote:
>> "Budikka666" wrote in messagenews:4686ba36-b046-41ce...@u9g2000vbm.googlegroups.com...
>> > Still running, I see. �Why is that no surprise? �But hey, thanks for
>> > once again proving to everyone here what a flaming hypocrite you are
>> > in trying to harass us in to following your fiction when you yourself
>> > have ZERO faith in your supposedly omnipotent god's ability to help
>> > you find tyhe guts to face me! �lol!
>>
>> > Budikka
>>
>> It is obvious that you are a very unhappy person.
>>
>> Why? Does anyone know?
>>
>> Thanks.
>
>Budikka isn't unhappy, but certainly appears to be angry.
>
>Budikka regularly tries to engage the theists in debate.
>
>Budikka demands evidence for their faith and belief.
>
>Knowing full well faith and belief require no evidence.

Isn't that largely what Budikka is on about?

Theists regularly claim they have evidence that supports their belief.

They also frequently claim that their evidence is solid, compelling
and that nothing other than God can serve to explain it.

But, when one asks what that evidence is....

Well, we all know where the story goes from there.

Neither have I noticed any absence of rudeness on the part of theists
when one questions them about their beliefs.

If I had a nickel for each time a theist has threatened me with
hellfire and damnation simply for pointing out that their proffered
evidence isn't really evidence at all...

>Budikka then gets angry and vents that anger on the theists.

When one is confronted with the same fallacy from the same theist for
literally the thousandth time...

Why is that response inappropriate?

>As far as I can see, it's a pointless and futile exercise.

I disagree.

It's always useful to point out that theists are irrational actors who
rely on lies and threats to support their position.

It may be redundant to those who follow the relevant discussion groups
regularly, but for those who only check in occasionally, Budikka's
posts tend to clarify the standing of the claims that theists are
prone to making.

>I used to read Budikka's posts with interest at one time.
>
>Now I rarely do so, because they no longer go anywhere.

That's largely because, as Budikka frequently notes, her opponents
refuse to support their claims and run away, often while hurling
threats and insults as they do so.

[duke]

On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 06:59:37 -0800 (PST), Ken <flak...@aol.com> wrote:

>Puke, AmeriKKKan - AmeriKKKan, living proof you can't fix ball-on-a-
>string stupid

Devil's Advocaat now agrees with me. Surprise that.

[duke]

On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 16:53:54 -0800, Jeanne Douglas <hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com>
wrote:

You already have it. If you don't eat the food on your plate, it gets thrown
away.

[duke]

On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 23:36:04 -0800 (PST), Devils Advocaat <manky...@gmail.com>
wrote:

Which is why I don't mess with her anymore. She's done.

[Devils Advocaat]

I'm not denying the fact that abuse and insults are thrown by both
sides.

But as my maternal grandmother would say "two wrongs don't make a
right".

Trading insults, in my opinion isn't the behaviour I would expect from
adults, or even teenagers over a certain age.

Regardless of whether they are theist, atheist or agnostic.

I just wish both sides would drop the schoolyard behaviour and try and
debate in a less abusive manner.

But for that to happen, one side should disarm first, as a gesture of
trust.

[linuxgal]

Yap wrote:
> Like the truth that a dead human in ancient time can be a pixie in the
> sky, doing practically nothing for millennium upon millennium?

More like absolutely nothing.

--
Halftime at Circvs Maximvs, and the Lions lead the Christians 326-0