Re: The InFamous Last Words Series #2 Bukakke, Proving Creationism wrong, even when the topic is Atheism! or the weather B^D Re: Buddikkka opts to migrate to Nth Korea was Re:"Those that don't make mistakes, don't make anything" - the story of atheism

[fasgnadh]

On 21/01/2012 4:41 PM, raven1 wrote:
> Olrik try's to suck up to me:
>> raven1 is (even more) ridiculous when he explodes in hysterical rage:
>>> On 21/01/2012 3:05 AM, fasgnadh wrote:
>>>> raven1 became inarticulate and incoherent with rage:
>>>>> On 21/01/2012 2:42 AM, fasgnadh wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The InFamous Last Words Series
>>>>>>
>>>>>> #2 Bukakke, Proving Creationism wrong, even when the topic is Atheism!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've been back about a month doing a quick mop-up after a
>>>>>> years absence since I completed the Great Cleansing of alt.atheism
>>>>>> in 2010, and already there are atheists faking posts in my name,
>>>>>> new sockpuppets being born as I demolish the old guard
>>>>>> and all the ranting bigots are reduced to posting I liner ad hom
>>>>>> and abuse, snipping and running away and abandoning the field
>>>>>> to me, completely! B^D
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's happened even faster than last time! B^D
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The InFamous Last Words Series is an occasional review where
>>>>>> I take note of the atheists who, after a particularly bruising
>>>>>> encounter with the Sledgehammer of Truth, are too scared to ever
>>>>>> again post a response to any of my threads. B^]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's a form of Natural Selection that WEEDS OUT the weak, sickly,
>>>>>> infantile, under-developed and moronic trolls
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I keep their final posts as a record of the scalps taken, along
>>>>>> with the trophies over my mantlepiece
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is my Bukakke trophy, taken from our first encounter;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.humanisthall.net/Trophy3.jpg
>>>>>>
>>>>>> where he claimed the Romanov children, tortured,
>>>>>> terrorised and killed by atheist thugs, were 'despots' and
>>>>>> when I demanded evidence for such Slander of the Innocents,
>>>>>> he did the Runaway Chicken;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P0kPQiQufpE
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So Bukakke is #2 in the Infamous Last Words series, A real
>>>>>> Woman of La Mancha who fearlessly tilts and the Creationist
>>>>>> Windmil all the time.. even when the topic is nice clothes,
>>>>>> or cheese!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAH
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's not that he's OBSESSED or anything, but really when he
>>>>>> spends her life online fighting that particularly American form
>>>>>> of Christianity, as if it was The Greatest Threat To World Peace,
>>>>>> wwhile everyone thought that it, and it's successor, were defeated
>>>>>> in the Dover School Board trial!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nothing like flogging a deceased equine, eh Bukakke?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAAA
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So I had a lot of rabid rants to choose from, all following the same
>>>>>> tiresome, rather HYSTERICAL script.. but this is a typical, if
>>>>>> unusually low-key, example;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My post was about atheism, you can see most of the text below,
>>>>>> but Bukakke SNIPPED ALL OF IT! B^D changed the subject
>>>>>> to somethingn irrelevant like "Disproving Creationism" (WTF? B^)
>>>>>> and posted some drivel, unrelated to the thread topic;
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 13/01/2012 10:12 PM, fasgnadh wrote:
>>>>>>> Budikka666 snipped and ran from the discussion, posting some
>>>>>>> irrelevant,
>>>>>>> anti-Christian rant:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> # From: Budikka666 <budi...@netscape.net>
>>>>>> # Newsgroups: alt.atheism,talk.atheism,alt.talk.creationism,
>>>>>> # alt.agnosticism,alt.religion.christian
>>>>>> # Subject: Disapproving Creation: Usenet Christians Going out
>>>>>> # of Their Way to Spread Their Message of Universal Hatred.
>>>>>> # Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 14:22:37 -0800 (PST)
>>>>>> # Message-ID: <bcf83520-d7c8-493f-
>>>>>> #
>>>>>> # This is just to say thank you. By spreading your depraved endless
>>>>>> # message of universal Christian hatred, you are doing a better job of
>>>>>> # driving people away from religion than any of us atheists could ever
>>>>>> # hope to do.
>>>>>> #
>>>>>> # So hey, thanks!
>>>>>> #
>>>>>> # Budikka
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Apart from having nothing to do with the current topic, her post
>>>>>> doesn't disprove Creationism, just any claim to sanity he might have
>>>>>> had, nor is it in response to a 'depraved endless message of universal
>>>>>> Christian hatred' because, a) I'm not a Christian and b) my post
>>>>>> was not an expression of Christian ANYTHING, especially hatred!?!!!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So I mocked her mercilessly, he had another breakdown
>>>>>> and fled the scene:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <unsnip>
>>>>>>>> On 10/01/2012 1:19 PM, fasgnadh wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Atheists are always criticising those who built the first
>>>>>>>>> Schools and Hospitals, but they never build any better ones.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> They enjoy the benefits of free, open, progressive, tolerant
>>>>>>>>> secular democratic states built by majority religions societies
>>>>>>>>> (but never achieved by ANY atheist state, ALL totalitarian shitholes)
>>>>>>>>> but they bite the hand that feeds them.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I have offered to help raise the airfare so that they could leave
>>>>>>>>> horrible places where there are democratic freedoms and human rights,
>>>>>>>>> like the USA which prints "In God We Trust" on it's currency, and
>>>>>>>>> go to
>>>>>>>>> the last remaining Atheist State, the glorious utopia of North Korea,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This is just to say thank you.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Great! Our first taker for the One way ticket to Nth Korea! B^D
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I will pass the hat around, I'm sure your atheist friends will
>>>>>>> ante up just to get rid of you.. er I mean to help you fulfill
>>>>>>> your dream in an Atheist State Utopia, far away from the Majority
>>>>>>> 'religious population and those human rights you hate so much! B^]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> but none of the flamin' hypocrites want to go! B^D
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Correction, one of the flaming hypocrites will actually step up
>>>>>>> and experience the full horrors of an ATHEIST TYRANNY!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Wot a Gal! , er, I mean cross-dressing bloke! B^D
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> They mock those who created soaring cathedrals and music to fill
>>>>>>>>> them,
>>>>>>>>> but they only destroy the temples, church's, mosques and synagogues
>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>> others have built, leaving no architecture to rival the Gothic,
>>>>>>>>> no music to match the sacred, no art to compare to Bernini
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> They are completely incapable of making the human spirit soar
>>>>>>>>> on wings of inspiration.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And that is just another reason why the influence of the great
>>>>>>>>> spiritual leaders endures, and that of the atheist leaders in
>>>>>>>>> history,'
>>>>>>>>> Marx, Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot.. fade to dust.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The worlds great religions inspired the steady progress of mankind,
>>>>>>>>> dragging it out of primitive superstition and blood sacrifice into
>>>>>>>>> the modern era.. pillars in the evolution of science from Ibn Sina
>>>>>>>>> to Newton and LeMaitre, in mathematics from Al Gibra and
>>>>>>>>> al-Khwārizmī to
>>>>>>>>> Descarte to Pascal, in medicine and all the arts, forging
>>>>>>>>> the civilisations we enjoy...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ...and others merely sneer at what they have never achieved.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Why are all the great end enduring civilisations based on the
>>>>>>>>> spiritual
>>>>>>>>> teachings of the world religions, and why has atheism never, in
>>>>>>>>> all of
>>>>>>>>> human history. created even one decent democracy, let alone a great
>>>>>>>>> and enduring civilisation that otehrs might sneer at, as they do now?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The Men Who Come Behind
>>>>>>>>> - Henry Lawson
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> There's a class of men (and women) who are always on their guard—
>>>>>>>>> Cunning, treacherous, suspicious—feeling softly—grasping hard—
>>>>>>>>> Brainy, yet without the courage to forsake the beaten track—
>>>>>>>>> Cautiously they feel their way behind a bolder spirit’s back.
>>>>>>>>> If you save a bit of money, and you start a little store—
>>>>>>>>> Say, an oyster-shop, for instance, where there wasn’t one before—
>>>>>>>>> When the shop begins to pay you, and the rent is off your mind,
>>>>>>>>> You will see another started by a chap that comes behind.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So it is, and so it might have been, my friend, with me and you—
>>>>>>>>> When a friend of both and neither interferes between the two;
>>>>>>>>> They will fight like fiends, forgetting in their passion mad and
>>>>>>>>> blind,
>>>>>>>>> That the row is mostly started by the folk who come behind.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> They will stick to you like sin will, while your money comes and
>>>>>>>>> goes,
>>>>>>>>> But they’ll leave you when you haven’t got a shilling in your
>>>>>>>>> clothes.
>>>>>>>>> You may get some help above you, but you’ll nearly always find
>>>>>>>>> That you cannot get assistance from the men who come behind.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> There are many, far too many, in the world of prose and rhyme,
>>>>>>>>> Always looking for another’s ‘footsteps on the sands of time.’
>>>>>>>>> Journalistic imitators are the meanest of mankind;
>>>>>>>>> And the grandest themes are hackneyed by the pens that come behind.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If you strike a novel subject, write it up, and do not fail,
>>>>>>>>> They will rhyme and prose about it till your very own is stale,
>>>>>>>>> As they raved about the region that the wattle-boughs perfume
>>>>>>>>> Till the reader cursed the bushman and the stink of wattle-bloom.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> They will follow in your footsteps while you’re groping for the
>>>>>>>>> light ;
>>>>>>>>> But they’ll run to get before you when they see you’re going right;
>>>>>>>>> And they’ll trip you up and baulk you in their blind and greedy heat,
>>>>>>>>> Like a stupid pup that hasn’t learned to trail behind your feet.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Take your loads of sin and sorrow on more energetic backs!
>>>>>>>>> Go and strike across the country where there are not any tracks!
>>>>>>>>> And—we fancy that the subject could be further treated here,
>>>>>>>>> But we’ll leave it to be hackneyed by the fellows in the rear.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So, Bukakke, what made you decide to bugger off to one
>>>>>>> of the few places on Earth where the atheists are as rabid
>>>>>>> as yourself?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> you are doing a better job of driving people away
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Aw shucks, everyone says that! B^]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Tis true, I have cleansed the Augean stable
>>>>>>> that was alt.atheism of most of the shit!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Now, I'm asking all of Bukakke's friend to send a donation
>>>>>>> so we can help him on his way!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sign up here with your pledge so we can see
>>>>>>> how much we have raised, remember this is
>>>>>>> the first atheist fundraiser, do us proud:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Name Amount
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> fasgnadh(agnostic) $0.10
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ................ ......
>>>>>>> ................ ......
>>>>>>> ................ ......
>>>>>>> ................ ......
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Anyone want to contribute to the 'Let's Send Bukakke to Nth
>>>>>> Korea' and raise the average IQ in the US' fundraiser?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> B^]




Raven? No? you cheap bastard! B^D


>>>>>>>> So hey, thanks!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Oh, you are most welcome, I just wanted to
>>>>>>> get the pot rolling, with a token of your true worth.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Budikka
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We know, the screeching keeps the cows from giving milk,
>>>>>>> and we live in Australia.
>>>>>




Poor raven, he doesn't want people to have the right to
express views different from the atheists! 8^o
Like most of the whining atheist hypocrites he really doesn't understand
democratic freedoms and tolerance, which is after
all, one of the wonderful, progressive features of the secular
democracies that were all built and sustained by MAJORITY
RELIGIOUS societies, and NEVER arose in any atheist state.

Like the atheist tyrants, he thinks YOUR freedom
to speak, think and believe, depend on HIS permission:

>>>>> No one asked you back.
>>>>
>>>> No one needs permission from atheist thugs, this isn't
>>>> one of your atheist state tyrannies where you can torture
>>>> and kill people to shut them up...


Poor atheist thugs, they just don't understand what democratic
freedoms are all about.. that's why human rights were
always ABUSED in EVERY atheist state in history.

But he's not in Maoist China, Leningrad or Pol Pot's year zero,
he CAN'T silence people here just because HE CAN'T COPE WITH
THEIR VIEWS, and the cognitive dissonance they cause to
his delusional mindset.. so he becomes angry and abusive..

in which case always slap their snout with a wet newspaper,
just like you would with a mongrel;

>
>>>> Here you are IMPOTENT! (in EVERY WAY, if what your
>>>> boyfriend says is true) B^D
>>>>
>>>> What do people normally say to you when you behave
>>>> like the post forging, lying shitpig you are?
>>>>
>>>>> Fuck off.




Oh my, who's the angry, frustrated, inarticulate boy!?!!!

>
>>>> Atheists.. too stupid to listen to those with higher IQ's..
>>>>
>>>> and that would include everyone, all the mammals,
>>>> and most of the amoeba.
>>>>
>>>> You only ever got ONE thing right in your life;
>>>>
>>>> # From: raven1 <quotht...@nevermore.com>
>>>> # Newsgroups: alt.atheism
>>>> # Subject: Re: Anyone seen Hysteria, Abu Baker Bashir and Kelsey
>>>> Bjarnyard? B^D
>>>> # Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 21:15:11 -0500
>>>> # Message-ID: <87ttk498t9sueojr7...@4ax.com>
>>>> #
>>>> # There has never been a "Great, Enduring Atheist Civilization"
>>>>
>>>> BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAAA
>>>
>>> What part of "fuck off" was unclear to you?


The part where you think your ignorance, stupidity, jealous rage,
hate filled abuse, and hysterical screeching counts. B^]

>
>> I do like "fasgnadh"

I've told you, I'm not interested, I'm straight,
in a relationship, and never date outside the human species.

You will just have to stay with your boyfriend, Ravin!

> The funniest part is that he's in deep

aaaaaaAAAAARRRRRGGGGHHHH! Spare us the balls-deep details! Ugh!




--

Ex- Atheist, now Prophet, Richard Dawkins claims a "superpowerful
intelligent and moral energy" entity, "like God", is plausible and
could have 'evolved' somewhere in the Universe "by an explicable
scientific progression of incremental evolution", (which no
atheist can explain). B^D

# "After two hours of conversation, Professor Dawkins walks far afield.
# He talks of the possibility that we might co-evolve with computers, a
# silicon destiny. And he’s intrigued by the playful, even soul-stirring
# writings of Freeman Dyson, the theoretical physicist.
#
# 'In one essay, Professor Dyson casts millions of speculative years
# into the future. Our galaxy is dying and humans have evolved into
# something like bolts of superpowerful intelligent and moral energy.
#
# Doesn’t that description sound an awful lot like God?
#
# "Certainly," Professor Dawkins replies. "It’s highly plausible that
# in the universe there are God-like creatures."
#
# He raises his hand, just in case a reader thinks he’s gone around a
# religious bend. "It’s very important to understand that these Gods
# came into being by an explicable scientific progression of
# incremental evolution."'
#
# Could they be immortal? The professor shrugs.
#
# “Probably not.” He smiles and adds, “But I
# wouldn’t want to be too dogmatic about that.”"



http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/20/science/20dawkins.html?pagewanted=all


So, which atheist is going to explain the inexplicable,
unscientific, BELIEF in "these {atheist] Gods", with no proof
whatsoever, and show us the evidence of how, and where, God evolved?

...........................................................

...........................................................

...........................................................


---------

alt.atheism FAQ:

http://altatheismfaq.blogspot.com/


http://groups.google.com.au/group/alt.atheism/msg/7c0978c14fd4ed37?hl=en&dmode=source



"Atheism is the natural and inseparable part of Communism."
-Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)

"We must combat religion"
-Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)

“Down with religion and long live atheism;
the dissemination of atheist views is our chief task!”
- Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)

"Our program necessarily includes the propaganda of atheism."
- Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)



http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:8290?context=latest

http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:8295?context=latest

http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:6348?context=latest

http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:17478?context=latest


"How can you make a revolution without firing squads?"
- Lenin

http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:17475?context=latest

http://www.c96trading.com/Nagant_NKVD_300h.jpg


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/telegraph/multimedia/archive/01001/Tsar-family_1001874c.jpg

[The Demon of Mockery]

> >>>>>> # From: Budikka666 <budik...@netscape.net>

You have interesting delusions.

> >>>>> No one asked you back.
>
> >>>> No one needs permission from atheist thugs, this isn't
> >>>> one of your atheist state tyrannies where you can torture
> >>>> and kill people to shut them up...
>
> Poor atheist thugs, they just don't understand what democratic
> freedoms are all about..  that's why human rights were
> always ABUSED in EVERY atheist state in history.

And Iceland. Don't forget Iceland. Or Finland. Or most of Northern
Europe. Poland's an exception.

> But he's not in Maoist China, Leningrad or Pol Pot's year zero,
> he CAN'T silence people here just because HE CAN'T COPE WITH
> THEIR VIEWS, and the cognitive dissonance they cause to
> his delusional mindset..  so he becomes angry and abusive..
>
> in which case always slap their snout with a wet newspaper,
> just like you would with a mongrel;
>
> >>>> Here you are IMPOTENT! (in EVERY WAY, if what your
> >>>> boyfriend says is true) B^D
>
> >>>> What do people normally say to you when you behave
> >>>> like the post forging, lying shitpig you are?
>
> >>>>> Fuck off.
>
> Oh my, who's the angry, frustrated, inarticulate boy!?!!!

Well, when one makes baseless and unfounded accusations, being told,
"Fuck off," is getting off easy, really.

> >>>> Atheists.. too stupid to listen to those with higher IQ's..
>
> >>>> and that would include everyone, all the mammals,
> >>>> and most of the amoeba.
>
> >>>> You only ever got ONE thing right in your life;
>

> >>>> # From: raven1 <quoththera...@nevermore.com>

> >>>> # Newsgroups: alt.atheism
> >>>> # Subject: Re: Anyone seen Hysteria, Abu Baker Bashir and Kelsey
> >>>> Bjarnyard? B^D
> >>>> # Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 21:15:11 -0500

> >>>> # Message-ID: <87ttk498t9sueojr7g4tep9k42rdjlg...@4ax.com>

> >>>> #
> >>>> # There has never been a "Great, Enduring Atheist Civilization"
>
> >>>> BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAAA
>
> >>> What part of "fuck off" was unclear to you?
>
> The part where you think your ignorance, stupidity, jealous rage,
> hate filled abuse, and hysterical screeching counts.  B^]

Nice projection, Mr. Rayner.

> >> I do like "fasgnadh"
>
> I've told you, I'm not interested, I'm straight,
> in a relationship, and never date outside the human species.
>
> You will just have to stay with your boyfriend, Ravin!
>
> > The funniest part is that he's in deep
>
> aaaaaaAAAAARRRRRGGGGHHHH!  Spare us the balls-deep details!  Ugh!

How cute, fag-lames from the allegedly ever-tolerant. You are so '90's
alt.flame.

Is there some reason that a hypothesis must be immediately proven,
without otherwise instantly rendering it entirely unscientific?

Anyway, on with AUK business. I believe the above evidence speaks for
itself, but principally to those who remember the requirements
necessary to make these nominations stick. So, I shall provide the
description for these awards, courtesy of Colonel Jake:

George Armstrong Custer "Kicked @$$" Award

Given to those brave, inspiring crusaders who will keep up a lost
lunatic cause despite all odds, even after the enemy has won, set up
their own superpower in their midst and are chugging Guinness in a
Kook-free world scenario.

Unabomber Surprise

This award is intended to honor those who have the gift for saying the
least with the most. Those who, for some reason only they may fathom,
more than all others crave the art of saying infinite amounts of
Nothing... and are PROUD OF IT.

http://www.coloneljake.com/AUK/AAD/

I would be willing to entertain seconding nominations for other
awards, such as KOTM/CNOTM/LMA, should further evidence be provided
(but those three are already hotly contested, so please, real evidence
only, not just "fasgnadh was mean to me/my whole group! WAH!!"),
though evidence of theological k00kery would be better, not that I can
second another "72 Raisins" nom this month. Wee Saul needs
competition. Actually, a GoK might do nicely...

Snarky

[Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler]

On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 00:30:20 -0800 (PST), The Demon of Mockery
<popes...@gmail.com> wrote in
<e2eb16e0-dec0-4232...@4g2000pbz.googlegroups.com>:

>> >>>>>>>>> al-Khw?rizm? to

Nomination noted and recorded.

>
>Unabomber Surprise
>
>This award is intended to honor those who have the gift for saying the
>least with the most. Those who, for some reason only they may fathom,
>more than all others crave the art of saying infinite amounts of
>Nothing... and are PROUD OF IT.

Nomination noted and recorded.

>
>http://www.coloneljake.com/AUK/AAD/
>
>I would be willing to entertain seconding nominations for other
>awards, such as KOTM/CNOTM/LMA, should further evidence be provided
>(but those three are already hotly contested, so please, real evidence
>only, not just "fasgnadh was mean to me/my whole group! WAH!!"),
>though evidence of theological k00kery would be better, not that I can
>second another "72 Raisins" nom this month. Wee Saul needs
>competition. Actually, a GoK might do nicely...
>
>Snarky

--
http://blackhelicopternews.blogspot.com/view/classic

http://blackcopternews.angelfire.com/index.html

http://k00kpedia.Net. (Coming soon!)

[fasgnadh]

On 21/01/2012 9:59 PM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler wrote:
> The Demon of ad-Hockery explain's hos "These Gods

A .hypothesis' no, but a categorical statement such as "these Gods
came into being by an explicable scientific progression..."
requires that the claim "these God's came into being" [PAST TENSE]
needs to be supported by evidence or else it is simply an unfounded
belief.

The author specified that there is "an explicable scientific progression
of incremental evolution." which no one has
ever seen, ... and as you have criticised me for challenging
his baseless assertion...

Where is this explanation?


.........................................................

.........................................................

.........................................................

You haven't provided ANY evidence that "that these Gods

came into being by an explicable scientific progression of

incremental evolution." B^D

No atheist believer in Prophet Dawkins ever has, despite the
categorical imperative: "It’s very important to understand.." it.

>> instantly rendering it entirely unscientific?

Exactly! What took you so long?

>> Anyway, on with AUK business.

Yes, best you run along back to the Kook sandpit, , you have no
propensity for logic.


Demon of Monkery is nominated for the Dr Perkin's Shite Medallion
(with carrot chunks) for confused babble in defence of atheism

# It's Official, Atheists claim to be a persecuted RELIGION: B^D
#
#
# "THE Atheist Foundation of Australia has lodged complaints
# of religious discrimination in Melbourne and Hobart
#
# "atheism counts as a religion, Dr Perkins said."
# The Age 29/1/2009


and for the Prophet Dawkins sash, a pretty pink silk number
for confused, inane, self-contradiction, last awarded, collectively,
to the "Jewish Homosexual Trade Unionists for Nazism" party, the
dominant faction in AUK.

> Nomination noted and recorded.

Oh, I doubt you have the honest and integrity to act with honour,
let alone the intellect to understand why you can't.

Here, have an honorary "Atheist assumes the Orthodox Position"
certificate, for services to pointless and irrelevant nihilism;

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_4YFhK87NXPE/TMHO0nh9GAI/AAAAAAAAEEg/rZYicPYdES4/s1600/Head-Up_Ass.png

[Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler]

On Sun, 22 Jan 2012 11:24:48 +1100, fasgnadh <fasg...@yahoo.com>
wrote in <oHISq.2169$%E2....@viwinnwfe01.internal.bigpond.com>:

>The[slap!]

Nice campaign speech, fasgnadh, but your nomination for an award that
does not exist is DENIED.
--
http://blackhelicopternews.blogspot.com/view/classic

http://blackhelicopternews.blogspot.com/p/award-winners-1994-2012.html

http://k00kpedia.Net. (Coming soon!)

[fasgnadh]

Musty Tavek, Bland Lizard of Kooks, meet another Kook, Warlord Steve:

# From: Steve Knight <skni...@cox.net>
# Newsgroups: alt.atheism
# Subject: A.A. BAAWA - FAQ
# Message-ID: <p8mrb5lvaf0cj5bp1...@4ax.com>
# Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 02:46:34 -0700
#
# We kill theists and shit down their throats
#
# Warlord Steve
# BAAWA

Boring Atheist Arsholes Wanking Away meet your soul-mates
Adolescent Undergrad Kooks.

You two will enjoy each other, in every hole. B^D

> Friendly Neighborhood Kook, Vote Mangler wrote:
>> The Demon of ad-Hockery explain's how "These Gods came into being";
>
> Because I am concerned with the environment, and only wear turbans made
> with post-consumer recycled polyester, I am snipping this lengthy screed
> by my client,

No one could possibly believe that you are a lawyer,
let alone have a client, you sound more like one
of Prophet Dawkin's blind beleivers.

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_4YFhK87NXPE/TMHO0nh9GAI/AAAAAAAAEEg/rZYicPYdES4/s1600/Head-Up_Ass.png

Ok, who are the accused and what have they done?

> Soldier of God.

Prophet Dawkins itself, but he's a member of the AUK and BAAWA!!
Smells like conflict of interest! B^[

Oh well call your first witness:

> Now on to the wise statements by Pope Snarky,

It's your funeral, Crusty B^D

>>>> So, which atheist is going to explain the inexplicable,
>>>> unscientific, BELIEF in "these {atheist] Gods", with no proof
>>>> whatsoever, and show us the evidence of how, and where, God evolved?
>>>
>>> Is there some reason that a hypothesis must be immediately proven,

A 'hypothesis', no, but a categorical statement such as "these Gods

came into being by an explicable scientific progression..."
requires that the claim "these God's came into being" [PAST TENSE]
needs to be supported by evidence or else it is simply an unfounded

belief. Like your notion that you are a Grand Lizard! pffft B^D

We sensible agnostics laugh in your general direction.

The author specified that there is "an explicable scientific progression
of incremental evolution." which no one has
ever seen, ... and as you have criticised me for challenging

Dawkin's baseless assertion...

Where is this explanation?


.........................................................

.........................................................

.........................................................

You haven't provided ANY evidence that "that these Gods

came into being by an explicable scientific progression of

incremental evolution." B^D

No atheist believer in Prophet Dawkins ever has, despite the

categorical imperative: "It’s very important to understand.." it.

>>> instantly rendering it entirely unscientific?

Exactly! What took you so long?

>>> Anyway, on with AUK business.

Yes, best you run along back to the Kook sandpit, you have no
propensity for logic.


Musty Tavek, Bland Lizard of AUK, is nominated for the Dr Perkin's
Starfish with Fake leaf Cluster for confused babble in defence of atheism:

# It's Official, Atheists claim to be a persecuted RELIGION: B^D
#
#
# "THE Atheist Foundation of Australia has lodged complaints
# of religious discrimination in Melbourne and Hobart
#
# "atheism counts as a religion, Dr Perkins said."
# The Age 29/1/2009

and for the Prophet Dawkins Sash, a pretty pink silk number that will
match your panties, for confused, inane, self-contradiction, last
awarded, collectively, to the "Republican NO-government for Congress"
party, the second most dominant faction in AUK.

> Demon of Mockery,
> offers his imprimatur.

Who wouldn't! B^]

>> Nomination noted and recorded.

Oh, I doubt you have the honest and integrity to act with honour,
let alone the intellect to understand why you can't.

Here, have an honorary "Atheist assumes the Orthodox Position"
certificate, for services to pointless and irrelevant nihilism;

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_4YFhK87NXPE/TMHO0nh9GAI/AAAAAAAAEEg/rZYicPYdES4/s1600/Head-Up_Ass.png

>>> Anyway, on with AUK business.
>

> Fasgnadh's lengthy campaign against the unbelievers has combined the
> military genius

Aw you are making me blush.

It was easy, Kooks are easy meat they have all the tactical
skills..

> of a Custer

EXACTLY! and they are such mindreaders, they never have to
pay any attention to what others say. B^D

> he has shown the sort of stamina and single-minded
> determination. which is found only among the iron-willed

Kicking the arses of thick-as-pigshit atheist thugs and
childish Kooks is a mere frolic, I can't spend ALL my time at the beach!
BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAAHAH

You are very longwinded for someone who says nothing...
where did you study pointless and empty rhetoric?

The school for the prolix?

> the hopelessly demented.

Ah, you do them great shame!

...
> while pouring out verbiage that would leave Matthew Moulton
> begging for a diaper change.

You kooks should take better care of your colonically
challenged leaders.

> And so I, the Grand Wizard of AUK, happily second these nominations.

Who do you think will take the Dr Perkins "We atheists Are a Religion"
award for rank hypocrisy, Bland Lizard, you or your boyfriend?

> The Grand Wizard of AUK has spoken.

You think you are so ineffectual you actually have to tell people
that you just said something!

BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHA

[fasgnadh]

On 22/01/2012 6:22 AM, çu wrote:
> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler<fn...@databasix.com> sez 21 Jan 2012:

>> On 22/01/2012 12:06 PM, fasgnadh wrote:
>>> Musty Tavek, Bland Lizard of Kooks, meet another Kook, Warlord Steve:

# From: Steve Knight <skni...@cox.net>

# Newsgroups: alt.atheism

>>>> Now on to the wise statements by Pope Snarky,

It's your funeral, Crusty B^D

>>>>>>> So, which atheist is going to explain the inexplicable,
>>>>>>> unscientific, BELIEF in "these {atheist] Gods", with no proof
>>>>>>> whatsoever, and show us the evidence of how, and where, God evolved?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is there some reason that a hypothesis must be immediately proven,

A 'hypothesis', no, but a categorical statement such as "these Gods
came into being by an explicable scientific progression..."
requires that the claim "these God's came into being" [PAST TENSE]
needs to be supported by evidence or else it is simply an unfounded
belief. Like your notion that you are a Grand Lizard! pffft B^D

We sensible agnostics laugh in your general direction.

>>> The author specified that there is "an explicable scientific progression
>>> of incremental evolution." which no one has
>>> ever seen, ... and as you have criticised me for challenging
>>> Dawkin's baseless assertion...

Where is this explanation?


>>> .........................................................
>>>
>>> .........................................................
>>>
>>> .........................................................

You haven't provided ANY evidence that "that these Gods

came into being by an explicable scientific progression of

incremental evolution." B^D

No atheist believer in Prophet Dawkins ever has, despite the

categorical imperative: "It’s very important to understand.." it.

>>>>>> instantly rendering it entirely unscientific?

Exactly! What took you so long?

>>>>>> Anyway, on with AUK business.

>>>>>> Anyway, on with AUK business.
>>>>

>>>> Fasgnadh's lengthy campaign against the unbelievers has combined the
>>>> military genius
>>>
>>> Aw you are making me blush.

It was easy, Kooks are easy meat they have all the tactical
skills..

>>>> of a Custer

EXACTLY!

>>> and they are such mindreaders, they never have to
>>> pay any attention to what others say. B^D
>>>
>>>> he has shown the sort of stamina and single-minded
>>>> determination. which is found only among the iron-willed
>>>
>>> Kicking the arses of thick-as-pigshit atheist thugs and
>>> childish Kooks is a mere frolic, I can't spend ALL my time at the beach!
>

> recognize fuzznuts,

I suppose you all learn to do that when your Bland Lizard
Turkey Slaps you in your ritual humiliation sessions.

> but remember to vote for meowmix.

Your favourite catfood?

You think it will beat your Adolescent Undergrad Kooks for the prizes?

Well, I guess.

If intelligence and good looks count for anything.

B^p

[The Demon of Mockery]

> A .hypothesis' no,<BITCHSLAP>

Thanks, but I have no interest in your opinion of (or failure to
comprehend) his rhetorical flourishes. However, do feel free to keep
frothing about them, and about my "slapping" you.

> The author specified that there is "an explicable scientific progression
> of incremental evolution." which no one has
> ever seen,   ... and as you have criticised me for challenging
> his baseless assertion...

He's only trying to be fair -- nothing's impossible, after all,
including Stargate: SG-1-style "Ascended" visiting planets like this
one, thousands of years ago. We already have evidence that life
exists, or has existed, on other planets, so why not life which
ascended to a state of pure energy? Also, evolution can be replicated
in a laboratory. Thus, it has, in fact, been "seen." Humanity's
failure to witness any verifiable instances of evolution to an energy
state is strictly incidental -- it's _possible_, and it explains the
myths and legends of "gods."

>      Where is this explanation?

He didn't say he had one, he said the scientific progression was
"explicable," rather than inexplicable. An explanation is possible,
regardless of whether he can provide a good one. Yahweh/Jehovah has no
explanation whatsoever, and no evidence.

> .........................................................
>
> .........................................................
>
> .........................................................
>
> You haven't provided ANY evidence that "that these Gods
> came into being by an explicable scientific progression of
> incremental evolution."                                       B^D

He's provided precisely as much evidence for his "natural 'gods'" as
you have for your "supernatural" one, and raised you one on
explanations, even if it lacked details.

> No atheist believer in Prophet Dawkins ever has, despite the
> categorical imperative: "It’s very important to understand.." it.

Thanks to a wide array of science fiction short stories and novels, we
at least have a frame of reference to discuss other possibilities
besides the con games of Judaeo-Xianity and Islam, including the one
that all deities are complete fabrications, though that latter one may
only be true to a certain extent.

> >>  instantly rendering it entirely unscientific?
>
> Exactly!   What took you so long?

Your concept of the scientific method is rather, shall we say,
*stringent* -- at least, when it comes to hypotheses to which you take
personal exception. In fact, I think you may just raise it to a
Frankensteinian level of weird science, for which AUK does, in fact,
have a highly appropriate award.

http://www.coloneljake.com/AUK/AAD/

Victor von Frankenstein Weird Science Award

Given to those inspired, pioneering visionaries with their worthy
inventions, institutions, and prides-and-joys, who have reasoned it
out, who KNOW The Answer, who would know how to use it to make for a
better humanity... if only somebody would listen to them.

On the basis of his k'lame that Richard Dawkins was making a
"categorical statement" (as opposed to using a rhetorical flourish),
to the effect that "these Gods came into being by an explicable
scientific progression...", in need of immediate supporting evidence;
that he (Dawkins) specified, "'an explicable scientific progression of
incremental evolution.' which no one has ever seen," and finally, that
Dawkins' failure to provide the aforementioned evidence constitutes
bad science, of such low quality as to discredit atheism entirely, I,
Pope Snarky Goodfella of the undulating cable, JM, CK, POEE, KOTHASK,
DSOCPL, HCNB, GGGHD, EOTHIDIAUTP, FI, BCB, CEM, CPFG, CPFWJ, SectICoM,
SoHI, GoOS, ETC., do hereby nominate for the Victor von Frankenstein
Weird Science Award the poster known as <fasgnadh>.

Seconds?

> >> Anyway, on with AUK business.
>
> Yes, best you run along back to the Kook sandpit, , you have no
> propensity for logic.

...My gods, that's lame. Considering you posted into the "sandpit,"
with every intention of getting raven1 and/or Budikka nominated for
awards, I'm actually the one who ought to be telling you to "run
along" -- except, of course, having kooks voluntarily offer themselves
up for award contention (in a "NOT ME! THEM!" sense (not that reverse
psychology has much chance -- AUK has its own psychologists, though
they may be a bit tardy, ATM)) just doesn't happen that often.

> Demon of Monkery is nominated for the Dr Perkin's Shite Medallion
> (with carrot chunks) for confused babble in defence of atheism

Golden Killfile

Given to the most killfile-worthy net.kooks on Usenet. This award
recognizes exceptional killfilable merit; if you are unworthy enough
to be ignored by everyone on the face of the earth, you are eligible
for this award.

The above is so nominated. Seconds?

> #    It's Official, Atheists claim to be a persecuted RELIGION:  B^D
> #
> #
> # "THE Atheist Foundation of Australia has lodged complaints
> # of religious discrimination in Melbourne and Hobart
> #
> # "atheism counts as a religion, Dr Perkins said."
> #          The Age 29/1/2009
>
> and for the Prophet Dawkins sash, a pretty pink silk number
> for confused, inane, self-contradiction, last awarded, collectively,
> to the "Jewish Homosexual Trade Unionists for Nazism" party, the
> dominant faction in AUK.

Clealy, sir hace never encountered the concept of context.

>  > Nomination noted and  recorded.
>
> Oh, I doubt you have the honest and integrity to act with honour,
> let alone the intellect to understand why you can't.
>
> Here, have an honorary "Atheist assumes the Orthodox Position"
> certificate, for services to pointless and irrelevant nihilism;
>

> http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_4YFhK87NXPE/TMHO0nh9GAI/AAAAAAAAEEg/rZYicPY...

Oooooh, someone's bucking for a Tinfoil Sombrero...

Snarky

[%]

i 1,999,734,923,870,000 it

[Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler]

On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 19:38:25 -0800 (PST), The Demon of Mockery
<popes...@gmail.com> wrote in
<3e181a2c-9022-4317...@lr19g2000pbb.googlegroups.com>:

>Hail Eris! On Jan 21, 4:24 pm, fasgnadh wrote:

>
>http://www.coloneljake.com/AUK/AAD/
>
>Victor von Frankenstein Weird Science Award
>
>Given to those inspired, pioneering visionaries with their worthy
>inventions, institutions, and prides-and-joys, who have reasoned it
>out, who KNOW The Answer, who would know how to use it to make for a
>better humanity... if only somebody would listen to them.
>
>On the basis of his k'lame that Richard Dawkins was making a
>"categorical statement" (as opposed to using a rhetorical flourish),
>to the effect that "these Gods came into being by an explicable
>scientific progression...", in need of immediate supporting evidence;
>that he (Dawkins) specified, "'an explicable scientific progression of
>incremental evolution.' which no one has ever seen," and finally, that
>Dawkins' failure to provide the aforementioned evidence constitutes
>bad science, of such low quality as to discredit atheism entirely, I,
>Pope Snarky Goodfella of the undulating cable, JM, CK, POEE, KOTHASK,
>DSOCPL, HCNB, GGGHD, EOTHIDIAUTP, FI, BCB, CEM, CPFG, CPFWJ, SectICoM,
>SoHI, GoOS, ETC., do hereby nominate for the Victor von Frankenstein
>Weird Science Award the poster known as <fasgnadh>.

Nomination noted and recorded.

>
>Seconds?

Rusty Tavek's second also recorded.

>
>> >> Anyway, on with AUK business.
>>
>> Yes, best you run along back to the Kook sandpit, , you have no
>> propensity for logic.
>
>...My gods, that's lame. Considering you posted into the "sandpit,"
>with every intention of getting raven1 and/or Budikka nominated for
>awards, I'm actually the one who ought to be telling you to "run
>along" -- except, of course, having kooks voluntarily offer themselves
>up for award contention (in a "NOT ME! THEM!" sense (not that reverse
>psychology has much chance -- AUK has its own psychologists, though
>they may be a bit tardy, ATM)) just doesn't happen that often.
>
>> Demon of Monkery is nominated for the Dr Perkin's Shite Medallion
>> (with carrot chunks) for confused babble in defence of atheism
>
>Golden Killfile
>
>Given to the most killfile-worthy net.kooks on Usenet. This award
>recognizes exceptional killfilable merit; if you are unworthy enough
>to be ignored by everyone on the face of the earth, you are eligible
>for this award.
>
>The above is so nominated.

Noted and recorded.

>Seconds?

>

>>
>> http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_4YFhK87NXPE/TMHO0nh9GAI/AAAAAAAAEEg/rZYicPY...
>
>Oooooh, someone's bucking for a Tinfoil Sombrero...
>
>Snarky

[%]

Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler wrote:

vetoed and revoked

[fasgnadh]

çu wrote:

> oh,

...Sounds like cu is being serviced right now! 8^o

> shut up,

Why? can't you focus on the humiliation?

> fuzznuts.

Ah, it's your turn to receive the intimate Kook Blessing
from Crusty Tavek!

I will leave you to your coupling.

>>> but remember to vote for meowmix.
>>
>> Your favourite catfood?
>>

>> You think it will beat you Adolescent Undergrad Kooks for the prizes?

[fasgnadh]

The Lemon of ad-Hockery Snipped and ran - no surprises there:

> On 22/01/2012 11:24 AM, fasgnadh wrote:
>> On 21/01/2012 9:59 PM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler wrote:

>>> The Demon of ad-Hockery explain's how "These Gods came into being
>>>>>

>> A 'hypothesis' no,

<unsnip the Chicken kook's Snip and Run from the critical issue..>

>> but a categorical statement such as "these Gods

>> came into being by an explicable scientific progression..."

>> requires that the claim "these God's came into being" [PAST TENSE]
>> needs to be supported by evidence or else it is simply an unfounded belief.

So, neither the Kooks, nor the atheists have any evidence, there is no
explicable rational process and "these [atheist kook] Gods have not
come into being, they are unfounded beliefs an inexplicable,
unscientific, regression of decremental devolution" called atheism.

Having folded completely, Lemon tries for sympathy:

> <BITCH SLAP>

Did the bitch hurt you? Why do you let Bland Lizard abuse
you like that?

Couldn't you grow some balls?

> Thanks,

You're welcome, I'm always concerned when I see weak people
acquiescing to violence and not standing up for themselves.

> but I have no interest in your opinion

Oh in that case I hope he slaps you harder and
fucks some sense into you.

At least you didn't snip my opinion like you did
with Prophet Dawkin's.

> of (or failure to comprehend) his rhetorical flourishes.

I comprehend that your bitch thinks he's a Grand Wizard, I just
refuse to share his delusion like you do..

Wizards aren't real, you poor befuddled infant!

> However, do feel free to keep frothing about them,

I merely told you the truth about them, the frothing is
all yours..

> and about my "slapping"

Yes, that is the probable cause.

Now, who do you have to thank for your growing self-awareness?

> you.

>>
>> The author specified that there is "an explicable scientific progression
>> of incremental evolution." which no one has
>> ever seen, ... and as you have criticised me for challenging
>> his baseless assertion...

Oh look, Lying Lemon, snipped the argument he couldn't refute,
and now he wants to debate his straw man misrepresentation of it!

> He's only trying to be fair -- nothing's impossible, after all,
> including Stargate: SG-1-style "Ascended" visiting planets like this
> one, thousands of years ago. We already have evidence that life
> exists, or has existed, on other planets, so why not life which
> ascended to a state of pure energy?

Fantastic, you actually BELIEVE in the atheist Gods!

And like Prophet Dawkins, it's all based on SPECULATIVE FICTION!

BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAA

> Also, evolution can be replicated in a laboratory.
> Thus, it has, in fact, been "seen." Humanity's
> failure to witness any verifiable instances of evolution to an energy
> state is strictly incidental -- it's _possible_, and it explains the
> myths and legends of "gods."

Nice try, quarter-wit, but your attempt to cast this as a 'possibility'
in the 'past' CONTRADICTS with Prophet Dawkins categorical
claim "These Gods CAME INTO BEING" and further contradicts
Dyson's speculative *FUTURE*

"Professor Dyson casts millions of speculative years

into the future. Our galaxy is dying and humans have evolved into

something like bolts of superpowerful intelligent and moral energy."

Like God?

"Certainly" Prophet Dawkins

You're all fucked. B^]

>> Where is this explanation?

>>
>>
>> .........................................................
>>
>> .........................................................
>>
>> .........................................................
>>
>> You haven't provided ANY evidence that "that these Gods
>> came into being by an explicable scientific progression of
>> incremental evolution." B^D

> He's provided precisely as much evidence for his "natural 'gods'"

they are not natural, they are completely unfounded speculation
about 'bolts of intelligent moral energy' ***LIKE GOD***
according to Prophet Dawkins.

> as you have for your "supernatural" one,

I'm an agnostic and have made no claims about a
'supernatural' God existing, so I need no evidence, you poor
irrational nutjob! B^D

Dawkins has made claims, and needs evidence or they are merely
UNFOUNDED BELIEFS!

B^D

And you let his supernatural God belief take a walk,
and attack me for not sharing his unfounded faith!

BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAAHAHHAAA

you're fucked, Kook! B^]

> and raised you one on explanations, even if it lacked details.

BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAAHAHAHHAA

I have no explanation because I have made no claim about "These God's
Existing" Dawkins did, and you believe him without evidence,
and claim *I* need evidence for no claimed belief in God!

BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAH

How do you stupid fucks even tie your shoelaces?

>> No atheist believer in Prophet Dawkins ever has, despite the
>> categorical imperative: "It’s very important to understand.." it.

So both atheists AND Kooks believe in the Gods of Prophet Dawkins,
defend his irrational DOGMA without proof, and then try and tell
people they are NOT PART OF A RELIGION!

BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAAHA

> Thanks to a wide array of science fiction short stories and novels, we
> at least have a frame of reference

BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAA

Yeah, AS FICTIONAL AS YOUR PRETENSIONS TO BEING OFFICERS In KOOK COURT!

BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAAHAHAA

> to discuss other possibilities
> besides the con games of Judaeo-Xianity and Islam,

You just continue frothing about your religious Jihad
against competing BELIEF SYSTEMS, Altar Boy!

B^D

> including the one
> that all deities are complete fabrications,

Where's your evidence?

It is a logical impossibility to prove the non
existence of any God.

You are merely FROTHING! B^p

If you don't lift your game I will simply lose
interest and put you in the bit bucket with inarticulate
fucktards like Olrik...

> though that latter one may only be true to a certain extent.

Olrik is a congenital liar, nothing he has ever said is true,
except the time he admittted to LYING;

Olrik is like the Kooks and their self-appointed
Titles in their fantasy world
.. he claims he has a Divine Right to lie about you
if he doesn't know the truth (which is always):

# From: Olrik <olri...@yahoo.com>
# Newsgroups: alt.atheism,alt.agnosticism,alt.religion
# Subject: Re: fasgnadh is defective
# Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2010 18:31:59 -0400
# Message-ID: <huh7l5$tss$1...@news.eternal-september.org>
#
# I can claim whatever I want. One day I say you're an atheist,
# then I claim you're a muslim.

>>>> instantly rendering it entirely unscientific?
>>
>> Exactly! What took you so long?

> Your concept of the scientific method is rather, shall we say,
> *stringent* --

Naturally to a woolly headed nincompoop who blithely swallows
any nonsense Prophet Dawkins stuffs down your throat, a
rigorous understandign of the scientific method is quite
beyond you.

It's not overly complex you know, a scientific theory
needs to be testable.

The thesis you have gullibly accepted is that "These Atheist
Gods" (already the self-contradiction in the definitional stage
makes the entire proposition invalid) which "came into being"
i.e. exist in the past tense, are proposed to be the product
of Dysons speculative fiction

> at least, when it comes to hypotheses to which you take
> personal exception.

Look fuckwit, lets use structured English in the hope you can
see your illogic and self contradiction.

If hypothesis
then FUTURE evolution
then Dawkins "These Gods came into being" falsified:
Else,
then categorical claim
then Prophet Dawkins and followers believe in God
without evidence, ie. are theists.
endif
endif

> In fact, I think you may just raise it to a
> Frankensteinian level of weird science, for which AUK does, in fact,
> have a highly appropriate award.

Look, I have no interest in what Wankery you assign
to yourselves for you expertise in sci fi and theology.

How long did it take to reduce you to fantasy and
unfounded beliefs?

> Seconds?



>>>> Anyway, on with AUK business.
>>
>> Yes, best you run along back to the Kook sandpit, , you have no
>> propensity for logic.

> ...My gods,

As we have seen, you have no proof they exist.

> that's lame.

blame your parents for a piss-poor education! B^p

> Considering you posted into the "sandpit,"

I posted into a number of Sheltered Workshops with low-IQ,
gullible, bottom feeders who are likely to take Profit Dawkins bait!

Kookville provided the largest catch, mostly sea-slugs and molluscs.

> with every intention

OMG, now we Madame Blatavsky and her Psychic Divination of 'INTENT'

Warning! Warning! MIND READER ON THE BRIDGE OF STARSHIP KOOK!

BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAAHAA

Run along.. lightweight, we have had our fill of idiot fantasy:

> of getting raven1 and/or Budikka nominated for
> awards,

OMG, you take your idiot selves so seriously that you
actually think rational humans would seek you out to receive
the imprimatur of Kook-Sucking Cretins for rational arguments
that stand on their own merits!??? Madness!

BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAA

What a pack of pompous, self-inflated ARSES you are!

I'd never heard of ANY of you, or your pretensions of
self-importance, till you Corps of Kook-suckers came
pack hunting little ol' me,

BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAA

It's simple vanity, when I rip an arrogant atheist a new arsehole
I just like a wide, variegated audience... the more people
that can have a laugh at you, the better....

I post into alt.fan.warlord simply as permanent mockery
of their atheist Warlord, Fluffy, whose scalp I took in minutes! B^]

and because Warlords are about as useless and uninteresting
as Wizards (snicker) alt.fan.warlord is handy storage and catalogue,
all my work is easy to find when I want to reprise some text.

> I'm actually the one

Uh Huh.. Born of a Virgin, no doubt, baptised by Bukakke
and far more deserving of Crucifixion than that last bloke! B^D

> who ought to be telling you to "run along" -- except, of course,

that you kooks lack originality and so here you are, floundering
along in my wake..... pfffft!

> having kooks voluntarily offer themselves
> up for award contention

Look Kook, it's REALLY Kooky the way you think YOUR obsession
with your sacred Sacraments .. the "Awards" has any meaning, relevance,
importance or even mild interest, for anyone who isn't a fully
paid up Kook.

It's like discovering a primitive, isolated tribe that has deemed
stretching their labia until they can wear it as a Hoodie is the
peak of their cultural artistry, Calling it the Crown of Creation and
endlessly comparing their wrinkles, follicles and ooozing std's...

No one cares, you pathetic attention seeking infants! B^]

"Award" me whatever your tiny little minds can be bothered with,
I literally don't give a rats arse.. and your notion that a
denunciation of my prey by your little gang of pompous poltroons,
could give me any satisfaction, when all I desire is to see them
rationally routed, (acknowledged or not), is just hilarious.

Unlike your Kook Court, I'm a lone wolf, I have discouraged
every would-be acolyte, I need no affirmation by Usenet nutters
to know my worth, my validation comes entirely from Reality 1,
the Real World.

> (in a "NOT ME! THEM!" sense (not that reverse
> psychology has much chance -- AUK has its own psychologists,

Why does that not surprise me! B^]

They don't seem to have improved your neuroses and psychoses.

The similarities with atheism are remarkable;

Both are pointless negatives, one targeting theists the
other targeting non-kooks.

Both revolve around ad hom and abuse.

And both have serious maladies;

# From: Steve Knight <skni...@cox.net>

# Newsgroups: alt.atheism

# Subject: A.A. BAAWA - FAQ
# Message-ID: <p8mrb5lvaf0cj5bp1...@4ax.com>
# Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 02:46:34 -0700
#

# We're here to talk about our own personal issues as atheists

B^D

Shouldn't your therapist have to hear that, not us!?

B^D

>> Demon of Monkery is nominated for the Dr Perkin's Shite Medallion
>> (with carrot chunks) for confused babble in defence of atheism
>
> Golden Killfile
>
> Given to

those who have not the slightest interest in your
cult's ritual and sacraments.

> The above is so nominated. Seconds?

fasgnadh.

I have explained why, elsewhare. B^]

Off you go now, and whip me with that limp lettuce leaf!

BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAAA

'But Pleeeeeease, don' throw me in dat Briar Patch!"

BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAAHAHAAA

>> # It's Official, Atheists claim to be a persecuted RELIGION: B^D
>> #
>> #
>> # "THE Atheist Foundation of Australia has lodged complaints
>> # of religious discrimination in Melbourne and Hobart
>> #
>> # "atheism counts as a religion, Dr Perkins said."
>> # The Age 29/1/2009
>>
>> and for the Prophet Dawkins sash, a pretty pink silk number
>> for confused, inane, self-contradiction, last awarded, collectively,
>> to the "Jewish Homosexual Trade Unionists for Nazism" party, the
>> dominant faction in AUK.
>

> Clealy, sir hacenever encountered the concept of context.

Can you please remove BLand Lizards cock from your mouth
before talking? It sounds even more garbled and incoherent
than usual!

B^]

>
>>> Nomination noted and recorded.
>>
>> Oh, I doubt you have the honest and integrity to act with honour,
>> let alone the intellect to understand why you can't.

See, accurate analysis enables a predictive capacity.

I not only call MY SHOTS.. I can call yours. ;-)

The last rigged, Group-Mind Henpeck I engaged with
was the atheists Quote of The Month. It was stacked,
undemocratic, predatory.. just like yours.

Within weeks of my intervention it ceased to function.

You're safe, compared to the atheists you are even
less influential and more irrelevant than them..

It's just not worth the effort.

>> Here, have an honorary "Atheist assumes the Orthodox Position"
>> certificate, for services to pointless and irrelevant nihilism;
>>
>> http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_4YFhK87NXPE/TMHO0nh9GAI/AAAAAAAAEEg/rZYicPY...
>
> Oooooh, someone's bucking for a Tinfoil Sombrero...

Wouldn't that risk tearing your anus?
I mena even more than accommodating Bland Wizard?

WTF... Tinfoil hats?

Haven't you lamers moved on from the early days of Usenet?

> Snarky


I merely wanted to demonstrate how easy it is to match
you at your own game, silly insults,
and watch you fail utterly at mine, rational debate.

cadit quaetio.





--

[fasgnadh]

Olrik speaks the truth for the first time since I've known him:
> On 22/01/2012 10:49 AM, fasgnadh wrote:
>> On 21/01/2012 5:44 PM, Olrik wrote:

>>>>>>>>> # From: Budikka666 <budi...@netscape.net>

>>>>>>>>> # Newsgroups: alt.atheism,talk.atheism,alt.talk.creationism,
>>>>>>>>> # alt.agnosticism,alt.religion.christian
>>>>>>>>> # Subject: Disapproving Creation: Usenet Christians Going out
>>>>>>>>> # of Their Way to Spread Their Message of Universal Hatred.
>>>>>>>>> # Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 14:22:37 -0800 (PST)
>>>>>>>>> # Message-ID: <bcf83520-d7c8-493f-
>>>>>>>>> #
>>>>>>>>> # This is just to say thank you. By spreading your depraved endless
>>>>>>>>> # message of universal Christian hatred, you are doing a better

>>>>>>>>> # job of driving people away from religion than any of
>>>>>>>>> # us atheists could ever hope to do.

>>>>>>>>> #
>>>>>>>>> # So hey, thanks!
>>>>>>>>> #
>>>>>>>>> # Budikka
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Apart from having nothing to do with the current topic, her post
>>>>>>>>> doesn't disprove Creationism, just any claim to sanity he might
>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>> had, nor is it in response to a 'depraved endless message of
>>>>>>>>> universal
>>>>>>>>> Christian hatred' because, a) I'm not a Christian and b) my post
>>>>>>>>> was not an expression of Christian ANYTHING, especially hatred!?!!!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So I mocked her mercilessly, he had another breakdown
>>>>>>>>> and fled the scene:
>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> <unsnip what chicken Bukakke ran from>

>>>>>>>>>>>> al-Khwārizmī to

>> What a tightwad, like all atheist hypocrites, he
>> wouldn't want to go live in any of the atheist regimes
>> in history!

>>
>>>>>>>>>>> So hey, thanks!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Oh, you are most welcome, I just wanted to
>>>>>>>>>> get the pot rolling, with a token of your true worth.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Budikka
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> We know, the screeching keeps the cows from giving milk,
>>>>>>>>>> and we live in Australia.
>>>>
>>>> Poor raven, he doesn't want people to have the right to
>>>> express views different from the atheists! 8^o
>>>> Like most of the whining atheist hypocrites he really doesn't understand
>>>> democratic freedoms and tolerance, which is after
>>>> all, one of the wonderful, progressive features of the secular
>>>> democracies that were all built and sustained by MAJORITY
>>>> RELIGIOUS societies, and NEVER arose in any atheist state.
>>>>
>>>> Like the atheist tyrants, he thinks YOUR freedom
>>>> to speak, think and believe, depend on HIS permission:
>>>>

>>>>>>>> No one asked you back.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No one needs permission from atheist thugs, this isn't
>>>>>>> one of your atheist state tyrannies where you can torture
>>>>>>> and kill people to shut them up...
>>>>
>>>> Poor atheist thugs, they just don't understand what democratic
>>>> freedoms are all about.. that's why human rights were
>>>> always ABUSED in EVERY atheist state in history.
>>

>> Atheists can't protect what they don't understand!

>>
>>>> But he's not in Maoist China, Leningrad or Pol Pot's year zero,
>>>> he CAN'T silence people here just because HE CAN'T COPE WITH
>>>> THEIR VIEWS, and the cognitive dissonance they cause to
>>>> his delusional mindset.. so he becomes angry and abusive..
>>>>
>>>> in which case always slap their snout with a wet newspaper,
>>>> just like you would with a mongrel;
>>>>
>>>>>>> Here you are IMPOTENT! (in EVERY WAY, if what your
>>>>>>> boyfriend says is true) B^D
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What do people normally say to you when you behave
>>>>>>> like the post forging, lying shitpig you are?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Fuck off.
>> >>
>>>> Oh my, who's the angry, frustrated, inarticulate boy!?!!!
>>

>> Raven's angry outburst is the impotent atheist's answer to
>> everything they can't understand, refute or deal with...
>> the mindless abuse of the Pravda propagandists.

>>
>>>>>>> Atheists.. too stupid to listen to those with higher IQ's..
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> and that would include everyone, all the mammals,
>>>>>>> and most of the amoeba.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You only ever got ONE thing right in your life;
>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> # From: raven1 <quotht...@nevermore.com>
>>>>>>> # Newsgroups: alt.atheism

>>>>>>> # Subject: Re: Anyone seen Hysteria, Abu Baker Bashir and Kelsey
>>>>>>> Bjarnyard? B^D
>>>>>>> # Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 21:15:11 -0500

>>>>>>> # Message-ID: <87ttk498t9sueojr7...@4ax.com>

>>>>>>> #
>>>>>>> # There has never been a "Great, Enduring Atheist Civilization"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAAA
>>

>> Naturally Raven hates to be reminded of his own confession
>> of the intellectual, cultural and moral bankruptcy of
>> atheism in comparison to religion...

>>
>>>>>> What part of "fuck off" was unclear to you?
>>>>
>>>> The part where you think your ignorance, stupidity, jealous rage,
>>>> hate filled abuse, and hysterical screeching counts. B^]
>>

>> BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAAHAHAA
>>
>> Slap an atheist on their snarling snout with the
>> wet rolled up newspaper of Truth and they start
>> fawning and sucking up like sycophants who love to be dominated;

>>
>>>>> I do like "fasgnadh"
>>>>
>>>> I've told you, I'm not interested, I'm straight,
>>>> in a relationship, and never date outside the human species.
>>>>

>>> So you don't like anyone?
>>
>> Can you be any more stupid? I just told you
>> i'm 'IN A RELATIONSHIP" and only date humans..
>>
>> It's just you moronic sacks of lying atheist shit I
>> want nothing to do with!
>>
>> > why
>>
>> Have you always been a cretin or were you fucked stupid
>> by your atheist friends?
>>
>>> don't have any friends
>>
>> Why is no one surprised? B^D
>
> You're amusing

Thanks, I try to make it fun for everyone,

I wish I could reciprocate and praise you for some
worthy attribute, but you're a witless post-forging liar..
and so your praise, while gratifying, is worth little.

perhaps you're good to your family, or kind to a pet.. who knows.

But in Usenet, you are just a negaite influence, mean-spirited
and with little of substance to offer.

You have the arrogant judgementalism of those who are certain they are
right, perhaps you could get a job with the Kooks, pretending you are
an arbiter of good taste, or post formatting, or sig size, you
already have the capacity for group-mind, pack hunting and mutual
toolfondling, from the militant atheist cult.. kookiness seems
to be your destiny...

> in a tragic sort of way.

Sure.. but you're pretty tragic already, this way you can
spend 100% of your time feeling superior, and you need even less
SUBSTANTIAL content than atheism requires.. you would go from ONE
solitary idea, to none, just whining, lying and endless ad hom..
.. your forte.

I'll just put in a good word with them for you.. I'm currently
up for some awards (they have nothing else to do) and from the
state of their sheltered workshop, they need new blood even more
than the decrepit, pointless, terminally declining alt.atheism

[fasgnadh]

Ken has nothing to say, so he took a whole post to not say it!: B^D

<unsnip, the kooks must be really embarrassed at their Bland Lizards
dismal performance, he's a hopeless lawyer, a dodgy shyster who
thinks a brief is what he wears as an undergarment..
(that explains the shitstains in his posts>

> On 23/01/2012 2:58 PM, fasgnadh wrote:
>> I see you are playing the odds - % wrote:
>>> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Mangler wrote:
>>>> "Musty Tavek, Bland Wizard of AUK (Adolescent Undergrad Kooks)" wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> GLOBAL VILLAGE PUMP
>>
>> How often do you and the other three pump each other?
>>
>> Is this your indictment: BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAAHAHAAAAAA
>>
>>>>> Fasgnadh, Soldier of God
>>
>> I'm an agnostic, dipshit.. We have seen you can't respond rationally
>> to any of the substance in any of my posts, but you might at least have
>> READ THEM!

No wonder the Kooks are removing all trace of their Grand Inquisitor's
lacklustre performance.. what a dimwit!

>> BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAA
>>
>> You just make yourself, your funny hats, and your pompous posturing and
>> pontification look silly when you get the most basic facts wrong!
>>
>> falsus in uno, falsis in omnibus
>>
>> You have made the obvious error, oft repeated by your atheist comrades
>> of assuming that CRITICISM OF ATHEISM, on the very solid grounds that
>> EVERY ATHEIST STATE in history has been a totalitarian tyranny..
>> does NOT mean that I am a theist, you illogical moron!


Ken obviously finds logic a bit too hard, he prefers ASCII ART! B^D



>> The opposite of BOTH those groups, those who believe without proof, and
>> those who disbelieve with no proof, is those of us who only accept that
>> which can be supported with evidence, the agnostics, those who are not
>> afraid to simply admit "we don't know".
>>
>> Now, I have already told you I don't mind receiving your 'awards'
>> (pfffft) and demonstrated that I am quite happy to provoke you,
>> mock you, and parody your LIFES WORK! B^D
>>
>> But hang me for what I am, you lying fraud, not for your dimwitted
>> incomprehension and slander.
>>
>> What else do you have? Oh a SIZE FLAME! BWAHAHAHAHAAHAHAAA
>>
>> >>> doesn't just spew out reams of text
>>
>> Listen, Bland, when they tell you size doesn't matter, and giggle,
>> they are lying to you.
>>
>> If you have a short attention span then stick to comix and Kook Chatter.
>>
>> I understand that you have it fixed in your mind that all posts
>> should be concise and not tax your little brain, but to evaluate
>> Origin of the Species with "Too Many Wurds, My Brane Hurts" is pathetic.
>>
>> No, that is NOT me comparing myself to Darwin, simply mocking your
>> measure of worth.
>>
>> Can you get any more trivial?
>>
>>>>> when the Grand Wizard calls.
>>
>> Oh fer fucks sake..
>>
>> get your head out of your arse before it swells any bigger from the
>> backup of shit you talk..
>>
>> I have been posting works of considerable length, and girth, LONG BEFORE
>> I became aware of YOUR sumptous presence..
>>
>> It was like watching a car
>> on the other side of the hill, approach at night..
>>
>> Initially there was a dim light, (first impressions are the best),
>> then the growing glare of your sense of your own Self-Importance..
>> then the blinding reflections from your gaudy tinsel costume..
>>
>> and then a trabant rolled by, chugging...
>>
>> and that, very, dim light.
>> B^}
>>
>> Your gambit that those you insult with stupid slander are 'slaves to
>> your will' if they come over and kick your arse till it bleeds,
>> is one of your most childish attributes.
>>
>> It's lame and it's old and it's tired, like the rest of your
>> endlessly repeated pantomime..
>>
>> Olrik could do your job better! B^D
>>
>>>>> He can be counted upon for hundreds of lines of Theistic Wisdom
>>
>> And that's a serious charge? B^D
>>
>> Wisdom confronts you with your own pettiness and limitaitons?
>>
>> "I want every human being not to be afraid of death, or of life
>> I want every human being to die at peace and surrounded
>> by the wisest, clearest and most tender care and to find the ultimate
>> happiness that can only come from an understanding of the nature of
>> mind and reality. "
>> - Sogyal Rinpoche
>>
>> "..science can only be created by those who are thoroughly imbued with
>> the aspiration toward truth and understanding. This source of feeling,
>> however, springs from the sphere of Religion... science without religion
>> is lame, religion without science is blind.
>>
>> - Albert Einstein "Ideas and Opinions" 1954
>>
>>
>> This one was WRITTEN for YOU: B^D Enjoy your pathetic pogroms
>>
>> When a simpleton abused him, Buddha listened to him in silence,
>> but when the man had finished asked him,
>> "Son, if a man declined to accept a present offered to him,
>> to whom would it belong?"
>> The man answered "To him who offered it."
>> "My son," Buddha said, "I decline to accept your abuse. Keep it for
>> yourself."
>>
>> - Will Durant The Story of Civilization.
>>
>>
>> Yes, Bland Lizard, who needs wisdom when we have Kook Komplaints:
>>
>>>>> in response to any comment from the infidels.
>>
>> Who are the infidels?""
>>
>> It's not a term I use.
>>
>> One of the elements of theist wisdom I find congruent with my
>> own beliefs and understanding is that truthfullness is a virtue
>> and bearing False Witness, as this Kook-Sucker demonstrates
>> is vile slander.
>>
>> >>> And his sigfile is even longer
>>
>> Repetition, you have already done Size flame, get over your
>> tiny penis.
>>
>> >>> than Diaperboi's,
>>
>> Guilt by association???
>>
>> IS THAT ALL YOU HAVE GOT?
>>
>> You dumbfucks spend days giving out awards based on
>> having a group hissy fit about Sig Size and quoting Wisdom?
>>
>> BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHA
>>
>>
>> YOu know what your behaviour indicates?
>>
>> >>> suggesting a truly divine case of overcompensation.
>>
>> For your truly pointless LIFE!
>>
>> BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAA
>>
>>>> Noted and recorded.
>>
>> How much longer can Bland Lizard Huff and Puff with this
>> pointless posturing over NOTHING, without his head imploding
>> from the vacuum?
>>
>>>>> Seconds?
>>>
>>> vetoed and rejected
>>
>>
>> Is this all that Musty Tavek, Vote Mangler, Demonic Monkey and the
>> other one, do, ALL DAY???
>>
>> Run through the same empty procedural posturing, calling each other as
>> witnesses to their mutual tool-fonfling and empty role plays?
>>
>> Wrangle with belly button lint and toe jam time after time?
>>
>> It's like a half-way house for quarter-wits.
>>
>> Most NG's have a purpose, Adolescent Undergraduate Kooks just seems
>> to be Dolly Dressups meets Judge Judy, and it's only output is
>> their self-aggrandisement!! B^D
>>
>> Can someone let me know the outcome when they finish, I want to
>> archive my Angry AUK 'awards'.
>>
>> ..and where's this website archiving their awards for past years,
>> how many did they give out last year?
>> I want to see how long they have been locked in their pointless
>> pogroms and what the trend line looks like.
>>
>> (At least someone cares about the substance, rather than playing
>> with form, procedures and mutual tool-fondling).
>>
>> Of all the basis for group-affirmation, theirs is one of the kookiest,
>> and most trivial.
>
> Re: Insane Rantings and Ravings from Fagsnatch

Ok, you don't like what I wrote but I said nothing you can refute,
no points you can rebut, no rational argument of your own, no
countervailing facts, no medical qualifications to diagnose insanity.

You're just another abusive ad hominist.

> snipped (as a public service)

Do you understand how usenet works? My post is still there.. B^]

All you have done is taken a copy of it (by posting) and emptied
it of all semantic content, put your name on it as if you are proud
of mere mindless destruction and posted is as a public disservice..

people waste their time clicking on it, only to find .. NOTHING..


And THAT'S your idea of Public Service?

That explains your self portrait.. narcissism and a blank look

> *O__O*



Yawn.. the Kooks are Comatose, the Atheists are cowering...

...off to the beach!


--

[The Demon of Mockery]

Hail Eris! On Jan 22, 8:25 am, fasgnadh wrote:
> The Lemon of ad-Hockery Snipped and ran - no surprises there:

So sorry, but your estimation of both your intellect and your wit are
in excess.

> # From: Olrik <olrik...@yahoo.com>

> # Newsgroups: alt.atheism,alt.agnosticism,alt.religion
> # Subject: Re: fasgnadh is defective
> # Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2010 18:31:59 -0400

> # Message-ID: <huh7l5$ts...@news.eternal-september.org>

> # From: Steve Knight <sknigh...@cox.net>

> # Newsgroups: alt.atheism
> # Subject: A.A. BAAWA  - FAQ

> # Message-ID: <p8mrb5lvaf0cj5bp1e4jbmlsqebu9j9...@4ax.com>

You campaign for your awards very handily, and with oceans of froth,
k00k. The maniacal laughter (at your own "jokes," even!) is an
especially nifty touch. You're a shoo-in! The "I don't care about
your STUPID, LAME awards" bit is about as traditional as k00kspeek
gets, as well. Note that this will be the only time I refrain from
snipping several acres out of your posts (not counting the .sig), BTW.

Snarky

[fasgnadh]

On 22/01/2012 11:33 AM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler wrote:
> On 22/01/2012 11:24 AM, fasgnadh wrote:

>> A 'hypothesis' no, but a categorical statement such as "these Gods

>> came into being by an explicable scientific progression..."
>> requires that the claim "these God's came into being" [PAST TENSE]
>> needs to be supported by evidence or else it is simply an unfounded belief.

[slap!]

A simple admission that you have no answer, would suffice.

A Snip'n'Run from the substantive issue is a fail.

You don't have to paste the sound of your arse cheeks slapping
together as your brain imploded, looking for a way out of
your logical impasse.

> Nice campaign speech,

Look Kook, I'm not 'campaigning',
there is no vote that determines truth.
none of you represent a meta-commentariat with any authority! B^D
No sane person cares about your Killfiles, your Awards,
your pretence and pompous self-puffery.

You simple couldn't meet the requirements for rational debate.

Q.E.D.

You stupid Kooks can award yourselves all the honorary
offices you like in your shared, hermetically sealed,
fantasy world, you can vote on denunciations and lick
each others wounded egos, it's all bum fluff and nonsense.

AUK, (Adolescent Undergraduate Kooks) is a sheltered
workshop where some 'tards reinforce each others delusional
state... you're entire NG lives are spent in content-free conflict,
ad hom and abuse..

This is a simple USENET DISCUSSION GROUP, there is just
the people in these NG's watching you be unable to produce
a rational response.. watching you snip and run. B^]

There are no votes required, we don't have to survey
others to know what we agree with and what we don't bother with,
you are not elected to any office with any significance outside
your own Imagination.

Haven't you noticed that it is a mark of Kookdom that
people sad tossers give themselves grandiose titles
such as Bland Lizard, and 'Warlord' B^p

> fasgnadh, but your nomination for an award that
> does not exist

Of course it exists, I created it as a parody of
what your ENTIRE USENET SCHTICK is! - a pretence
that if you wear funny uniforms and give yourself
grandiose titles, that you can talk shite and use
a piffle-process, pretending you have some authority
to judge WHAT CAN BE SPOKEN OF IN USENET,
declare you HAD A VOTE, and that your shite is caviar!

BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAAHAHAAA

No one but your little cult of clowns is swallowing it.

Parody is clearly a concept to subtle for you Kooks.

My awards are as real, funnier and more apt than those
from your tiny group of Kook-Suckers

What doesn't exist is an explanation, (none from
atheists, and none from their Kook character-assassins),
for Prophet Dawkins categorical statement that "these Gods
came into being by an explicable scientific progression..."
This mere statement of OPINION re Atheist Gods requires

the claim "these God's came into being" [PAST TENSE]

to be supported by evidence, or else it remains nothing
but an unfounded BELIEF.

Like your unfounded, supercilious, belief that you have some
overweaning power to determine what is valid in Usenet!

Hilarious:

> is DENIED.

No it isn't - I've already AWARDED IT!!! B^)

People have read it, some would have a laugh.
I won't go to the trouble of making a website to
archive it on, the 4 of you aren't worth that much trouble.

All you can do is stamp your widdle hooof and throw a hissy fit! B^D

Your 'denial' is just Kooks ...in DENIAL! B^D

Jesus, call your butt boy, the Lemon of Crockery,
to explain parody to you.

I choose not to PLAY your infantile political theatre...
where three pretentious, lying noobs who haven't managed
an AUK quorum in years, present each other with funny hats
and titles, stand around and toolfondle each other!

I have no intention of JOINING your Kookiness,

I just SENT IT UP!

BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAAAA

The only part that matters to me is the reasoned IDEAS and the purchase
they achieve in Reality 1.

The game of Reason, is the one you kooks have lost, you simply
can't debate the ideas:

>> The author specified that there is "an explicable scientific progression
>> of incremental evolution." which no one has
>> ever seen, ... and as you have criticised me for challenging
>> his baseless assertion...
>>
>> Where is this explanation?
>>

Kooks can't 'explain' let alone prove, the speculative fantasies
of other, ex-atheist kooks who are now in the GOD business!

B^D

>>
>> .........................................................
>>
>> .........................................................
>>
>> .........................................................


A Snip'n'Run is a fail! B^]

>> You haven't provided ANY evidence that "that these Gods
>> came into being by an explicable scientific progression of
>> incremental evolution." B^D
>>
>> No atheist believer in Prophet Dawkins ever has, despite the
>> categorical imperative: "It’s very important to understand.." it.
>>
>>>> instantly rendering it entirely unscientific?
>>
>> Exactly! What took you so long?

Kooks can't debate the substantive issue, and they
are too slow and clumsy for a battle of wits,

their entire schtick is shoring up each others delusion
that their self-appointed Titles and uniforms with plastic
peacoock feathers and imitation gold braid, actually signify!

BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAAAA

>>>> Anyway, on with AUK business.

BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAH

You have none!

I invite the readers to do what I have never bothered
to do until today, and have a look at these frauds in
their Sheltered Workshop - AUK! 8^o

They couldn't run a chook raffle, they couldn't
organise a root in a brothel!

They haven't managed to have one of their Judge Judy
mock courts and execution of the innocent, for YEARS..

it's a cesspit of mindless abuse, that makes even the atheists,
who have at least ONE (trivial and useless) IDEA , look good.


>> Yes, best you run along back to the Kook sandpit, you have no

>> propensity for logic.
>>
>>
>> Demon of Monkery is nominated for the Dr Perkin's Shite Medallion
>> (with carrot chunks) for confused babble in defence of atheism
>>
>> # It's Official, Atheists claim to be a persecuted RELIGION: B^D
>> #
>> #
>> # "THE Atheist Foundation of Australia has lodged complaints
>> # of religious discrimination in Melbourne and Hobart
>> #
>> # "atheism counts as a religion, Dr Perkins said."
>> # The Age 29/1/2009
>>
>>
>> and for the Prophet Dawkins sash, a pretty pink silk number
>> for confused, inane, self-contradiction, last awarded, collectively,
>> to the "Jewish Homosexual Trade Unionists for Nazism" party, the
>> dominant faction in AUK.
>>
>>> Nomination noted and recorded.
>>

>> Oh, I doubt you have the honesty and integrity to act with honour,

>> let alone the intellect to understand why you can't.

Seems I'm not just calling my shots, but I called the Kook's shots as
well!

That'll do me! B^] I have their measure.

[fasgnadh]

On 23/01/2012 7:48 PM, The Demon of Mockery wrote:
> Hail Eris! On Jan 22, 8:25 am, fasgnadh wrote:
>> The Lemon of ad-Hockery Snipped and ran - no surprises there:
>
> So sorry,

We don't expect anything better from any kook.

Go create an award declaring intellectual bankruptcy to be
a virtue and vote that you all receive it.

"Your post is too long" - Kook Kontol

"And irrelevant" - Department of Meta-Management
Kook Division

"you can't campaign
on Chinese New Year"
- Kook Kultural Sensitivity Bureau.


<snip> - mindless auto-Kook response.

> Snarky

What's my care factor? B^]

--

[fasgnadh]

On 13/01/2012 11:29 AM, Budikka666 wrote:
> On Jan 12, 5:49 am, Loirbaj<Rhodi...@wmconnect.com> wrote:
>
> No, we don't hate you losers.

Yes you do:

# From: Steve Knight <skni...@cox.net>

# Newsgroups: alt.atheism
# Subject: A.A. BAAWA - FAQ

# Message-ID: <p8mrb5lvaf0cj5bp1...@4ax.com>

# Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 02:46:34 -0700
#

# We kill theists and shit down their throats
#
# Warlord Steve
# BAAWA

> we do hate and will fight to the death

Unfortunately it's always your victims doing the dying;
as was the case of the atheist states terror, torture and
mass murder of over 60,000,000 OF THEIR OWN PEOPLE!

> Got that now

Good, when will we see atheists say sorry, like the church
has done for bullying Galileo?

And how does the MUCH MORE TERRIBLE death toll from that
atheist holocaust make you feel personally.

> numbnuts

Well, without a heart, at least it's felt somewhere.


> Budikka

Chicken Bukakke, still running after TWO YEARS, EIGHT MONTHS
and 27 DAYS!


Bukakke is the Original Runaway chicken!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P0kPQiQufpE


# From: fasgnadh <fasgn...@yahoo.com.au>
# Subject: How Bukakke was humbled and crawled away in defeat!
# Message-ID: <H7bPl.11167$y61....@news-server.bigpond.net.au>
# Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 10:05:27 GMT

Such a long time ago, and yet Bukakke is still stung by his loss! B^D

# Bukakke started out full of arrogance and aggression

Oh he still has that Shrill, Hysterical Banshee whining, but
it's now brittle and more likely to arouse laughter than fear,
after all, the whole of Usenet has seen him humbled; B^]


# # Subject: Formal Debate Challenge to "fasgnadh"
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
# # From: Budikka666 <budik...@netscape.net>
# # Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 15:21:28 -0700 (PDT)
# # Message-ID:
# # <be94a583-7dfb-414e-bff7-2e11a5c7c...@y71g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>
# #

Bukakke made the challenge, so I chose the weapons.. Atheist History:


It was like a battle of wits with an UNARMED opponent; B^D


# # From: fasgnadh <fasgn...@yahoo.com.au>
# #

# # Subject: Atheist infanticide
# # - "most horrific political crime of the 20th century"
# # Message-ID: <kvxKl.7613$y61.6...@news-server.bigpond.net.au>
# # Date: Fri, 01 May 2009 07:27:12 GMT
# # Newsgroups: alt.atheism,alt.religion,aus.religion,
# # alt.politics.communism,alt.politics.republicans,
# # alt.politics.democrats,uk.politics.misc,aus.politics
# #
# # "Russia exonerates Tsar Nicholas II
# #
# # The Russian supreme court has ruled that the country's
# # last tsar and his family must be recognised as victims
# # of Soviet repression 90 years after they were executed
# # by a Bolshevik firing squad.
# #
# #
# # By Adrian Blomfield in Moscow
# #
#
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/russia/3115053/Russia-exonerates-Tsar-Nicholas-II.html

So here we have one of the atheists, who bang-on endlessly
about the injustice done to Galileao (who after all was NOT KILLED,
and remained a Christian ;-) , trying to avoid a horrific
atheist crime: the TORTURE and MURDER of CHILDREN,
and in Bukakke's case, SLANDERING the VICTIM, aged 12;

No wonder they are the MOST distrusted and despised minority cult
in the USA.. Bukakke reveals WHY;

# # Tsar Nicholas II with his wife Tsarina Alexandra
# # (background), the Tsaravitch (2nd from right)
# # and his four daughters Photo: PA
# #
# # In an unexpected ruling, the court in Moscow declared
# # that Nicholas II and the royal family had been killed
# # illegally and are entitled to legal rehabilitation
# # by the state.
# #
# # The decision brings to a close a decade-long campaign
# # by the tsar's descendants to force the state to admit
# # culpability for what many Russians regard as the single
# # most horrific political crime of the 20th century."
# #
# #
# # The children saw their father shot and "were stabbed
# # with bayonets and then shot at close range in the head" by
# # the big Brave atheists.
# # Alexei was 13 and Anastasia 17
# # - Massie, R, The Romanovs The Final Chapter, 6
# #
# # "It also represents a symbolic end to Russia's often
# # tortured process of addressing the repressions of
# # the Soviet era."
# #
# # Nothing as tortured as the atheist holocaust deniers
# # trying to deny that the USSR was an atheist state! B^p
# #
# ...
# #
# # Most historians say there is enough evidence to
# # show that the executions were carried out on the
# # orders of Lenin,"
#
# And Bukakke showed atheists were still denying the terror,
# torture and murder carried out by atheist thugs;

#@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
#
# # # the Russian Royal family with a handful of
# # # children - who were Christians but behaved like despots
# # >
# # # Budikka
#
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@


... a 12 year old victim of the Atheist regime which
would go on to terrorise, torture and kill over 30,000,000 of
it's OWN PEOPLE!!!!

There is nothing like it in history, and yet it happened in the
last 100 years.. the supposedly MODERN ERA!


# When I demanded evidence for Bukakke's claim that 12 year old
# Alexi was a 'despot' who deserved be terrorised, tortured and
# killed by the atheist Red Terror .. Bukakke ran from the field
# and has never recanted his slander, BLAMING THE CHILD VICTIMS
# OF ATHEIST TERROR! 8^o


And here he is, STILL RUNNING (2 yrs, 8 mths, 27 days) and
EVADING the demand that he SHOW EVIDENCE for his vile
slander of Alexei and APOLOGISE, to his memory,
the victims of atheist tyranny, to Usenet and to me.

Until he does, he remains a mangy Dog, not worth pissing on,
much less to be ever debated with again!

Who would BOTHER, once DEFEATED, as he would be, he would
simply RUN AWAY, like the gutless lying coward he is!


# I have his shield, (a hammer and sickle on a field of red blood,
# with a big Yellow stripe down it's back...;-) above my mantle piece
# as a trophy.

http://www.humanisthall.net/Trophy3.jpg

[fasgnadh]

Budikka666 snips REALITY and IMAGINES people love and adore him:

"Flatnads Groupie Loves His Adored Atheists!"


Can't Get Enough of Us!"

Lets look at the facts Chicken Bukakke SNIPPED and RAN FROM
before we demolish Bukakke's latest lies:

> On 24/01/2012 8:52 PM, fasgnadh wrote:
>> On 13/01/2012 11:29 AM, Budikka666 wrote:
>>> On Jan 12, 5:49 am, Loirbaj<Rhodi...@wmconnect.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> No, we don't hate you losers.

It took milliseconds to demonstrate Bukakke's lie with
the facts, this is the atheists chosen SpokesOrc, their
Whorelord, (Bukakke is just a cut-price, 5th rate whore ;-);

>> Yes you do:
>>
>> # From: Steve Knight <skni...@cox.net>
>> # Newsgroups: alt.atheism
>> # Subject: A.A. BAAWA - FAQ
>> # Message-ID: <p8mrb5lvaf0cj5bp1...@4ax.com>
>> # Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 02:46:34 -0700
>> #
>> # We kill theists and shit down their throats
>> #
>> # Warlord Steve
>> # BAAWA

Fact Challenge for Bukakke, post a single atheist opposing
your leaders psychopathic violence, and I will match it
with TEN supporting him.

>>> we do hate and will fight to the death
>>
>> Unfortunately it's always your victims doing the dying;
>> as was the case of the atheist states terror, torture and
>> mass murder of over 60,000,000 OF THEIR OWN PEOPLE!
>>

Atheists can't refute the facts, in fact, the atheist source
cited by Trance Gemini, your Whorelords personal whore, already admitted
the horrific death toll from the atheist holocausts;

# From: Kilmir <kil...@gmail.com>
# Newsgroups: alt.agnosticism,alt.atheism,alt.religion.christian,
# alt.usenet.kooks
# Subject: Re: is religion really the answer? Not if the question is
# "What killed 60,000,000 in the last 100 years"
# - ATHEIST REGIMES DID IT! 8^o
# Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 03:39:48 -0700 (PDT)
# Message-ID:
<042262dc-a546-4054...@b9g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>
#
#
http://teapotatheism.blogspot.com/2008/06/anonymous-wanted-body-count-total-so-he.html
#
# atheists have caused almost a whopping 100 million deaths throughout
# world history.

BTW, Trance Stupor was one of my first atheist scalps,
she abandoned Warlord Steve and left him the broken husk
you see today..

>>> Got that now
>>
>> Good, when will we see atheists say sorry, like the church
>> has done for bullying Galileo?

Instead, Chicken Bukkake does the atheist standard response:

Snip the facts presented, Run from the evidence, and LIE.

>> And how does the MUCH MORE TERRIBLE death toll from that
>> atheist holocaust make you feel personally.
>>
>>> numbnuts
>>
>> Well, without a heart, at least it's felt somewhere.
>>
>>> Budikka

How easy it was to kick your arse out of the park, again!

Just like old times:

> I rebutted that several times and you ran like the
> screaming baby you are.

I'm here, YOUR OWN WORDS ARE THERE, and there is no rebuttal!

> You misrepresented what I was conveying,

I QUOTED *YOU*, verbatim, in context, properly cited so people
can confirm..

How did you "misrepresent" you?

BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAAAA

THAT IS WHAT YOU SAID ...about a child terrorised, tortured
and murdered by atheist thugs.. you heartless bitch.

>> ... a 12 year old victim of the Atheist regime which
>> would go on to terrorise, torture and kill over 30,000,000 of
>> it's OWN PEOPLE!!!!
>>
>> There is nothing like it in history, and yet it happened in the
>> last 100 years.. the supposedly MODERN ERA!
>>
>> # When I demanded evidence for Bukakke's claim that 12 year old
>> # Alexi was a 'despot' who deserved be terrorised, tortured and
>> # killed by the atheist Red Terror .. Bukakke ran from the field
>> # and has never recanted his slander, BLAMING THE CHILD VICTIMS
>> # OF ATHEIST TERROR! 8^o
>>

> and I kicked your god-filled,

I'm an agnostic, where is your evidence that this God you want
to blame, and falsely claim is the cause of your discomfit, EXISTS?

Another desperate Bukkake LIE! B^D

More FACT FREE SHITE from his

> false-witness bearing ass,

>> And here he is, STILL RUNNING (2 yrs, 8 mths, 27 days) and
>> EVADING the demand that he SHOW EVIDENCE for his vile
>> slander of Alexei and APOLOGISE, to his memory,
>> the victims of atheist tyranny, to Usenet and to me.
>>
>> Until he does, he remains a mangy Dog, not worth pissing on,
>> much less to be ever debated with again!
>>
>> Who would BOTHER, once DEFEATED, as he would be, he would
>> simply RUN AWAY, like the gutless lying coward he is!
>>
>>
>> # I have his shield, (a hammer and sickle on a field of red blood,
>> # with a big Yellow stripe down it's back...;-) above my mantle piece
>> # as a trophy.
>>
>> http://www.humanisthall.net/Trophy3.jpg

> and now here you are begging for my attention again!

Another easily dismissed LIE:

You posted in MY thread; B^D

Message-ID:
<601513bc-abee-4588...@p13g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>

You are such EASY MEAT, your lies are so clumsy and blatant.

> You don't worship any god you worship me, you sad
> and lost little child.

Bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahahaahahahahahahahaahaa

A moment ago you claimed I was 'God-Filled' now you admit
what your should have paid attention to when I told you I'm
an agnostic, and other, wiser, atheists told you it's true;

# From: raven1 <quoththera...@nevermore.com>
# Newsgroups: alt.atheism,talk.atheism,alt.religion,
# alt.politics.republicans,alt.politics.democrats,
# uk.politics.misc,aus.politics,alt.politics.communism
# Subject: Re: The Decline of alt atheism - and time to say farewell to
the most trivial and useless branch of Nihilism! B^D
# Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 16:26:06 -0400
# Message-ID: <n4ofb51jvj209trfh...@4ax.com>
#
# > Dear old "fasgnadh" asserts his deity exists, but can't prove it.
#
# Fasgnadh has never asserted that a deity exists, and recently admitted
# to being agnostic. He's not here to push a deity, he's here to push
# peoples buttons.

> I also kicked your ass on your endless lies about the Stalin regime
> and the Hitler regime and YOU RAN

Really? cite my "endless lies about the Hitler regime"?

I don't use Nazism as an object lesson for atheists because it
wasn't an atheist state, you lying cretin!

YOu are such EASY MEAT, your lies are so blatant, so desperate! B^]

So INEFFECTIVE! BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAAA

Half time score: In a long winded hysterical rant, Bukakke
presents no verifiable facts, numerous lies and self contradictions are
apparent, and the rest is ranting and frothing:

Bukakke is so desperately delusional she tries to misrepresent my me
leaving the atheists sheltered workshop for a year after decimating it,
(List of atheists who left under my tutelage supplied on request ;-) and
popping back in to see if it needs a further round of pest control.. as:

> You were run out of alt.atheism on a rail and now you come creeping
> back

You have me confused with John Baker, who had a breakdown under my
close questioning and in typical atheist self-loathing, tried to top
himself:

# From: John Baker <nu...@bizniz.net>
# Newsgroups: alt.atheism
# Subject: Another One Bites The Dust
# Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2008 05:07:33 -0500
# Message-ID: <hf1aj495t47br8nnh...@4ax.com>
#
# Just wanted to say farewell to everyone.
# I've been giving it quite a
# lot of thought lately, and I've
# decided it's time for me to move on.
#
# I've finally reached the end of my rope.
#
# I've simply had all I can stand
@
# I just can't handle it anymore.
#
# I don't see myself continuing

# I'm going to end up going postal.

Now THAT is what EVIDENCE of being run out of town
on a rail looks like!

Apparently Baker subsequently crept back...

Atheists take their own sad life stories and PROJECT them
onto those for whom they have NO OTHER way of dealing with
except what we see above, a catalogue of easily disproven
Lies and Slander.. and no EVIDENCE, whatsoever.

In conversations with evidence as this post demonstrates,
*I* provide the only evidence for claims made,
atheists merely snip it and lie.

Q.E.D

Lets toy with the rest of this nonsense;

> desperate for our attention

You posted in my thread!

'"Those that don't make mistakes, don't make anything"
- the story of atheism'

How very apt! 8^)

Thanks for playing, my predictable little puppet! B^]

You make me look positively Psychic! B^D

Look Bukakke, don't be jealous that the Kooks chose me
for their ritual pantomime, they are even more desperate,
attention-seeking whores than you, and they only piggy back
on high flyers whose performances sell tickets, so they can
leverage their own sense of self-Importance.

Are you really surprised that they, like everyone else,
don't care for your desperate monologues flogging the deceased
equine of Fundie Creationism because they are at your skill
level in the game?

B^]


> because you know as well as we do
> that without us, you have no friends at all.

I seem to have done pretty well without you for a year,
and coming back find you in the same pitiful rut as when
I left.

Time to offer you a more positive perspective than the sad
place you occupy;

82

Today, like every other day, we wake up empty
and frightened. Don't open the door to the study
and begin reading. Take down the dulcimer.
Let the beauty we love be what we do.
There are hundreds of ways to kneel and kiss the ground.

Jalal u'Din Rumi, a 13th century Sufi mystic, knew your
condition better than you do.. but your subconscious
reveals your state, and projects them:

> What a pitiful, worthless, useless, hopeless and
> desperate life you and your theist loser friends have.

8^)

You don't know me. You invent what you want to be true.

I don't pretend to know you, I deal with WHAT *YOU* SAY,
I quote it, I cite it properly.. there is no pretense
at mind reading your 'intentions' or your motivations..

I simply demolish YOUR WORDS, every lie you have made
has been falsified.

Rant on forever, you have no effect, because you don't deal
with reality, you wrestle with your projected delusions.

You simply can't win doing that.

> I pity you, I really do.

That's nice dear.

If it calms you down and helps you feel better, that's fine.

B^]

> I pity you and feel sorry for you,

It's like the calm after the raging storm of your bitter,
hate-filled angst, eh?

But it's even less honest than all your other exposed lies,
which revealed that you are driven by hatred and rage, not pity.

> but I have better things to do than waste my time

Oh, is that why we see not a single fact actually refuted by you,
merely your claim that you did so somewhere, .. sometime unspecified!

B^} You are a legend in your own mind, Bukakke

Not a single point of mine rebutted with any quotes of me saying what
you falsely claim I said.. clear contradictions where you claim I am
a theis 'god-filled' and then that I don't worship God, I worship YOU!

Can you HEAR yourself? B^D


And from your side, no evidence for any of your claims, whatsoever.

Not a sausage.. one, long, don't-take-a-breath RANT!

cadit quaetio!

caput mortuum:

I have done my best at

> educating an ignorant and evil child

and now it's too late,

I fear we can never be friends, you're a lying traducer,
and I'm not a Christian whose obliged to forgive. B^]


> like you,

Oh alright.. come and get a hug! B^D

but why are you such a miserable lying hate-filled bitch

> whose parents quite obviously failed dismally to raise
> a decent and functional son.


Aw, don't blame them, you could change.

Whatsoever things are true
Whatsoever things are honest
Whatsoever things are just
Whatsoever things are pure
Whatsoever things are lovely
Whatsoever things be of good report
If there be any virtue and
If there be any praise
..think on these things.

# From: Budikka666 <budi...@netscape.net>
# Newsgroups:

alt.atheism,alt.religion,alt.religion.christian,alt.agnosticism
# Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 03:38:16 -0800 (PST)
# Message-ID:
<bfcf3a9d-9711-449a...@m3g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>
#
# You can keep your spiritual values.
# I'll piss on them and pass on them.
#
# Budikka


> Budikka

When a simpleton abused him, Buddha listened to him in silence,
but when the man had finished asked him,
"Son, if a man declined to accept a present offered to him,
to whom would it belong?"
The man answered "To him who offered it."
"My son," Buddha said, "I decline to accept your abuse. Keep it for
yourself."

- Will Durant The Story of Civilization.

[fasgnadh]

On 25/01/2012 4:08 AM, raven1 wrote:
> On 25/01/2012 2:11 AM, fasgnadh wrote:
>> raven1 demonstrates his values, priorities and lack of humanity:

>>> On 24/01/2012 8:52 PM, fasgnadh wrote:

>>>> On 13/01/2012 11:29 AM, Budikka666 wrote:
>>>>> On Jan 12, 5:49 am, Loirbaj<Rhodi...@wmconnect.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> No, we don't hate you losers.
>>>>
>>>> Yes you do:
>>>>
>>>> # From: Steve Knight <skni...@cox.net>
>>>> # Newsgroups: alt.atheism
>>>> # Subject: A.A. BAAWA - FAQ
>>>> # Message-ID: <p8mrb5lvaf0cj5bp1...@4ax.com>
>>>> # Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 02:46:34 -0700
>>>> #
>>>> # We kill theists and shit down their throats
>>>> #
>>>> # Warlord Steve
>>>> # BAAWA
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> we do hate and will fight to the death
>>>>
>>>> Unfortunately it's always your victims doing the dying;
>>>> as was the case of the atheist states terror, torture and
>>>> mass murder of over 60,000,000 OF THEIR OWN PEOPLE!
>>>

>>> And you're still unable or unwilling to admit to yourself that you are
>>> just as much an atheist as any Communist leader in history.
>>
>> Ravin, you don't care about the 60,000,000 dead which you just
>> admitted were victims of ATHEIST LEADERS in every ATHEIST STATE IN
>> HISTORY!!!!!!!!!
>
> Of course I do. However, I properly attribute those deaths to
> political motives, not atheism.

The No True Atheist Fallacy!

"No true atheist would do" what every atheist leader of every atheist
state in history has done.

http://groups.google.com.au/group/alt.religion/msg/f2dad4783c9d6a57?hl=en

Look, you just claimed that *I* am "just as much an atheist as any
Communist leader in history"

You lied, I'm *not* an atheist, but EVERY
LEADER OF EVERY ATHEISTS STATE -Lenin, Stalin, Mao, and Pol Pot-
WERE "just as much atheist as communist!!!

And so, how can YOU 'attribute' those deaths COMMITTED by
atheists to political motives, not atheism when the atheists
who carried them out explicitly declared they were ATHEIST
policies, executed in the NAME OF Atheism.

"Atheism is the natural and inseparable part of Communism."
-Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)

"We must combat religion"
-Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)

“Down with religion and long live atheism;
the dissemination of atheist views is our chief task!”
- Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)

"Our program necessarily includes the propaganda of atheism."
- Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)

You are an atheist apologist for the acts of atheist states, terrorising
torturing and killing theists, destroying
their temples and churches and synagogues, and forcibly indoctrinating
children in ATHEISM in the schools.

Actions of the atheist leadership, every member of the ruling politburo
an atheist, actively implementing EXPLICIT State Atheist policies, in
the name of atheism.

> If all aheists were Communists, you'd have a point.

Irrelevant Straw man

I never claimed all atheists were communists.

Richard Feynaman was not a communist.

No have I claimed that all communists were atheists

In fact since the Chinese Communist party abandoned
the excesses of state atheism, reformed their constitution
and allowed greater religious and economic freedoms,
but STILL RUNNING A COMMUNIST ONE PARTY STATE, and CENTRAL
COMMAND ECONOMY at the strategic heights, freedom of religion,
of thought and belief have flourished, and so has peoples prosperity .

Without the fear and repression of EVERY ATHEIST REGIME,
people are free to THINK and BELIEVE,

In the atheist regimes you are an APOLOGIST for, the public
profession of faith is FORBIDDEN, theists and priests arrested,
terrorised, tortured and murdered..

... and believers cower in their homes:

"Isn't it grand to have religion relegated to a private
matter, like it belongs?"

Fuck you, an apologist for atheist tyranny.



BTW, not all communist states persecuted religion,
[Vietnam, Cuba ]

but EVERY ATHEIST STATE did!


>> All you want to do is make ME the issue.

> You *are* the issue, imbecile.

No the issue is the issue, I am just the person presenting
you with historical data about EVERY ATHEIST REGIME IN HISTORY
being a totalitarian tyranny.. which you can't process without
cognitive dissonance leading to your repetition of STRAW MAN
fallacies, rather that deal with the facts.

You atheists and kooks try to make it personal, turn it into
a witch hunt, just as the atheist regimes did.

Like you, they didn't attack the ideas, in an arena of free
and open discourse.. ({that only existed in the secular democracies
created by MAJORITY RELIGIOUS societies).. they attacked the
BELIEVERS, their lives, their families, their freedom in
a Terror than made the Inquisition look like a fucking tea party;

They were gutless maggots and they are still the same today

> You're engaging in classic guilt-by-association,

No, not all atheists are guilty of the Crimes against Humanity
committed by every atheist state in history, just THOSE
WHO COMMITTED THEM, and those of you who, like the Other
Holocaust deniers, make yourselves complicit by LYING that
atheists were not responsible, by pretending that they
were NOT atheist states, by DENYING THE ATHEIST HOLOCAUSTS.

> probably because you're in deep denial about
> your own atheism.

Pffft. You strain and gnats, pretending you are psychic and
can divine the psychology of others, but you swallow mountains
of dead bodies, the facts of atheist Crimes against Humanity
which you refuse to acknoeledge.


> You're like a Republican congressman who rails
> against gay marriage in public,

I'm not a Republican
I'm not in Congress
I support Gay marriage

> then goes trolling for random
> encounters in public restrooms.

I'm not gay.

So in what way am I *Like* your characterisation?

Your weak libel the sort of PRAVDA PROPAGANDA, LIES AND SLANDER
that atheist regimes used for THEIR CHARACTER ASSSASINATIONS!

The fruit does not fall far from the atheist tree, eh?


>> You're completely fucked, mate
>>
>> Walk away, go outside and lie on the green grass and watch the clouds..
>>
>> find a woman and experience the waqmth of human contact.
>> because you are seriously fucked up.
>>
>> I will be gone, again, sometime..
>>
>> get over me.
>>
>>
>>>>> Got that now
>>
>> Good, explain it to the sociopath who admits atheist crimes
>> against humanity ...but has other fish to fry. pfffft!

>>
>>>> Good, when will we see atheists say sorry, like the church
>>>> has done for bullying Galileo?
>>>>
>>>> And how does the MUCH MORE TERRIBLE death toll from that
>>>> atheist holocaust make you feel personally.
>>>>
>>>>> numbnuts
>>>>
>>>> Well, without a heart, at least it's felt somewhere.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Budikka
>>>>
>>

>> Be Melting Snow
>>
>> Lo I am with you always, means when you look for God,
>> God is in the look of your eyes,
>> in the thought of looking,
>> nearer to you than yourself,
>> or things that have happened to you.
>> There's no need to go outside.
>>
>> Be melting snow.
>> Wash yourself of yourself.
>> A white flower grows in the quietness
>> Let your tongue become that flower.
>>
>>
>>
>> The religion of love is a part from all religions.
>> The lovers of God have no religion but God alone
>> -The Mathnawi II, 1720

[fasgnadh]

On 26/01/2012 9:42 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote:
> "pandora"<pan...@peak.org> wrote in message
> news:HvCdneHUeIKeGL3S...@scnresearch.com...
>> On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 14:26:51 -0800, The Demon of Mockery wrote:
>>
>>> Hail Eris! On Jan 25, 2:18 pm, pandora wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 13:57:26 -0800, The Demon of Mockery wrote:
>>>>> Hail Eris! On Jan 25, 1:44 pm, Peter J Ross wrote:
>>>>>> In alt.usenet.kooks on Wed, 25 Jan 2012 15:54:50 -0500, Rusty
>>>>>> Tavek,
>>>>>> Grand Wizard of AUK wrote:
>>>>>>> For the next ballot, I hope to nominate Fasdnagh for the
>>>>>>> Palmjob
>>>>>>> Paddle.
>>>>
>>>>>> What makes you think that nominations from kooks like yourself
>>>>>> are
>>>>>> allowed, you unutterably pathetic, AUK-obsessed twit?
>>>>
>>>>> Actually, for this month only, the GaK has been opened, and most
>>>>> inmates (conditionally, depending on their level of displayed
>>>>> kookiness -- %/Squiggles has already been re-disenfranchised --
>>>>> and
>>>>> Bobo/KOTM winners are ineligible) allowed to nominate/second/vote,
>>>>> to
>>>>> give the awards a kickstart. The ones who show good behaviour may
>>>>> be
>>>>> permanently released, and possibly even pardoned. I believe the
>>>>> FNVW
>>>>> issued an executive order stating such, or possibly just said so
>>>>> in
>>>>> his post on accepting nominations.
>>>>
>>>>> Snarky
>>>>
>>>> I believe you are correct. And in this particular instance (Tavek),
>>>> I
>>>> am in complete disagreement as I feel heshit has already displayed
>>>> its
>>>> bad behaviour.
>>>
>>> Well, there've been some "questionable" posts, yes, but he's mostly
>>> skating on the non-k00ky side of the line. If he keeps going after
>>> PJR
>>> or Mirror of TRVTH (or you), I may change my opinion...
>>>
>>> Snarky
>>
>> Alrighty then.
>
> Look at the net nannies conspiring. How droll.

Careful, the Jihadis take themselves VERY seriously; B^p


# Kook threats
#
# From: The Demon of Mockery <popes...@gmail.com>
# Newsgroups:
alt.atheism,alt.agnosticism,alt.usenet.kooks,talk.atheism,alt.philosophy
# Subject: Re: Kook gags

on his own hypocrisy

# Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 17:50:56 -0800 (PST)
# Organization: http://groups.google.com
# Lines: 360
# Message-ID:
<692f4b30-e0d2-466f...@ov1g2000pbb.googlegroups.com>
#
#
# now that you have AUK's attention, it probably wouldn't even help if
# you retreated to your home group(s).
#
# The k00ks don't call us (TINU) "stAUKers" for nothing
#
# leaving a very easy-to- follow trail really isn't the most effective
# means of discouraging kook-hunters from tracking you)
# ...
# > What else would be appropriate, your Kookiness???
#
#
# Foam, santorum, threats (I *love* threats! They make me laugh...),
# the usual.


How many Kook-hours does the Kook Konclave spend in
mutual masturbation?

A: 24/day





--

[fasgnadh]

On 26/01/2012 9:11 AM, Rusty Tavek, Grand Wizard of AUK wrote:
> In article<slrnji0tu...@peterjross.me.uk>,

> Peter J Ross<p...@example.invalid> wrote:
>
>> In alt.usenet.kooks on Wed, 25 Jan 2012 15:54:50 -0500, Rusty Tavek,

>> Grand Wizard of AUK<aukvote...@safe-mail.net> wrote:

Still x-posting in protest agains x-posting I see, Bland Lizard.

Exemplary Kookiness!

And what's happening in life at the moment

>>> For the next ballot, I hope to nominate

Oh splendid, You have so much going on and yet
you find time to PRE-ANNOUNCE your next announcement

Gives you time to cue the trumpet fanfare, eh


But you only "hope" to nominate?

You suspect the spirochaetes may have rendered you incapable of
coherent speech by then.

It hasn't stopped you yet

>> What makes you think that nominations from kooks like yourself are
>> allowed, you unutterably pathetic, AUK-obsessed twit?
>

> You may want to check the Official AUK site,

Most people would prefer to put their dick in a blender.

> The Grand Wizard of AUK has spoken.

..Who?

> Thank you all for listening.


..What did he say?


--

[fasgnadh]

On 26/01/2012 11:11 AM, Rusty Tavek, Grand Wizard of AUK wrote:
> In article<4741i75uo6bfk2cjg...@4ax.com>,
> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler<fn...@databasix.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 17:11:09 -0500, "Rusty Tavek, Grand Wizard of AUK"
>> <aukvote...@safe-mail.net> wrote in
>> <aukvotewrangler-5B...@nntp.aioe.org>:

>>
>>> In article<slrnji0tu...@peterjross.me.uk>,
>>> Peter J Ross<p...@example.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>> In alt.usenet.kooks on Wed, 25 Jan 2012 15:54:50 -0500, Rusty Tavek,
>>>> Grand Wizard of AUK<aukvote...@safe-mail.net> wrote:

Still x-posting in protest against x-posting I see, Bland Lizard of Orcs.

Exemplary Kookiness!

And what's happening in life at the moment

>>>>> For the next ballot, I hope to nominate

Oh splendid, You have so much going on and yet

you find time to PRE-ANNOUNCE your next announcement! B^D

Gives you time to cue the trumpet fanfare, eh

>>>> What makes you think that nominations from kooks like yourself are
>>>> allowed, you unutterably pathetic, AUK-obsessed twit?
>>>
>>> You may want to check the Official AUK site,

Most people would prefer to put their dick in a blender.

>>> The Grand Wizard of AUK has spoken. Thank you all for listening.
>>
>> Two items:
>>
>> 1) Disrespect toward a FNVE will not be tolerated. Peter J Ross put
>> in a lot of time and effort to being FNVW. In case you missed it the
>> first time, disrespect toward a FNVW and/or the current FNVW will not
>> be tolerated.

How does the defendent plead?

> The Grand Wizardis
> Sean Monaghan on Wednesdays.



>> 2) Using the name
>> can have dire consequences
>
> The Grand Wizard must stand up here

Going so quickly? the exits to the left...

> we're looking for a bathroom wall.

Ah still marking your turf in the traditional Kook Manner

> Thank you all for listening.

Oh I won't be listening. How kooky.

You do like an audience, don't you.

[fasgnadh]

On 27/01/2012 1:42 PM, Musty Tavek, Bland Lizard of AUK wrote:
> In article<T-Odnek0Zb9QmL_S...@scnresearch.com>,
> pandora<pan...@peak.org> wrote:
>>> Oh, he's much improved. I do agree that he's still way too rude to you,
>>> but he's not as rude to you as he was
>>>
>> Perhaps. Although I wouldn't exactly call that much of an improvement.
>> And it certainly, IMO, doesn't give his nominations much credibility.
>> But, as I said, YMMV.
>
> If you find my presence so irritating, why not do us both a favor and
> killfile anything which has the string "Tavek" in the From: line?

BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHHAHAAHHAA!

What a hypocrite! B^D

You and your Korps of Kook-Suckers had precisely the
same option when my purposeful posts in AUK caused you
such cognitive dissonance, (without you even reading them,
according to Lemon of AdHockery! B^) but you chose
instead to launch a Jihad of crossposted Waffle-Blather WITH NO
PURPOSE AT ALL (other than the three of you in mutual
tool-fondling) ..to numerous NG's!

Kooky beyond Kompare, Bland Lizard


Your sudden understanding that you merely need to NOT read
that which you don't like, is a miracle, I only had to
suggest it a dozen times before it found someone at home!


B^D Priceless!

> who is frogging the Grand Wizard

Anyone with half a buck, according to the other cheap sluts in AUK.

> and who is likely to be even more annoying than me.

Man, that's a really hard one! ??????

Paris Hilton? nah

Kim Kardashian? nah

Your Kookiness, looks like you are Unsurpassed!

> when you manage the most hated man on Usenet you
> have to be ready to have popcorn boxes thrown at you.

In that case get yourself a new manager, I quit! B^]

> But though he may be difficult to love,

I'm sure if you continue the penicillin the syphillitic pustules
will become less obvious..

> the Grand Wizard is easy to ignore.

True, I have found that to be the case.

Easy to ignore, impossible to shut up.

Let's do that again, real soon.

> (The bejeweled turban, on the other hand, can be a
> bit distracting).

Well, they are normally worn on the head.

> Thank you

No worries, sport, no one wants you to be distracted
by anything as complex and difficult for you as ...a hat.

[fasgnadh]

On 27/01/2012 5:48 AM, DanielSan wrote:
> On 27/01/2012 4:54 AM, fasgnadh wrote:
>> On 27/01/2012 2:12 AM, raven1 wrote:

>> ...
>>
>>> Oh, look! The Red Herring Fallacy!
>>
>> No it's The No True Atheist Fallacy!

>>
>>
>>>> "No true atheist would do" what every atheist leader of every atheist
>>>> state in history has done.
>>>

>>> I neither said nor implied such a thing. Yes, they were atheists.
>>
>> Who committed murder and set out to persecute believers
>> IN THE NAME OF ATHEISM.

# From: raven1 <quotht...@nevermore.com>
# Newsgroups: alt.atheism

# Subject: Re: Anyone seen Hysteria, Abu Baker Bashir

# and Kelsey Bjarnyard? B^D

# Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 21:15:11 -0500
# Message-ID: <87ttk498t9sueojr7...@4ax.com>
#
#

# > raven1 wrote:
# >
# >> Even under officially atheistic regimes such as Stalin's,

BLAM! Atheist lies SHOT To SHIT! B^D

>> "We must combat religion"
>> -Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)
>

> Atheism is not anti-religion.

In reality:

EVERY atheist regime has been a bloodbath of anti-theist persecution;

"Criticism of atheism was strictly forbidden"

"Between 1917 and 1940, 130,000 Orthodox priests were arrested.
In 1918, the Cheka under Felix Dzerzhinsky executed over
3000 Orthodox clergymen of all ranks.
Some were drowned in ice-holes or poured over with cold water
in winter until they turned to ice-pillars."


John Shelton Curtis, The Russian Church and the Soviet State
(Boston: Little Brown, 1953)


The Cultural Devolution:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DIrUHVFkm9A

The Historical face of State Atheism is a boot, smashing a human face;

# http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_atheism#Wolak2004
#
# "State atheism is the official promotion of atheism
# by a government, typically by active suppression of
# religious freedom and practice."
# - "Protest for Religious Rights in the USSR:
# Characteristics and Consequences,
# David Kowalewski,
# Russian Review, Vol. 39, No. 4 (Oct., 1980), pp. 426-441,
#
#
# "An atheist, Pol Pot suppressed Cambodia’s Buddhist religion:
# monks were defrocked; temples and artifacts, including statues of
# Buddha, were destroyed; and people praying or expressing
# other religious sentiments were often killed.
# ...the government emptied the cities through mass evacuations
# and sent people to the countryside. Cambodians were overworked
# and underfed on collective farms, often succumbing to disease or
# starvation as a result. Spouses were separated and family meals
# prohibited in order to steer loyalties toward the state
# instead of the family.
#
# About 1.7 million Cambodians, or about 20 percent of the population,
# were worked, starved, or beaten to death under Pol Pot’s regime."
# - http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761579038/pol_pot.html
#
# The Cambodian Genocide:
http://www.lietuvos.net/istorija/communism/communism_photos2/392millones.jpg

#
# "The country's 40,000 to 60,000 Buddhist monks,
# regarded by the regime as social parasites,
# were defrocked and forced into labor brigades.
# Many monks were executed; temples and pagodas were
# destroyed or turned into storehouses or jails.
# Images of the Buddha were defaced and dumped into
# rivers and lakes. People who were discovered praying
# or expressing religious sentiments in other ways
# were often killed.
#
# The Christian and Muslim communities were among the most
# persecuted, as well. The Roman Catholic cathedral of
# Phnom Penh was completely razed.
#
# The Khmer Rouge forced Muslims to eat pork, which they
# regard as an abomination. Many of those who refused were killed.
# Christian clergy and Muslim imams were executed."
# - http://countrystudies.us/cambodia/29.htm
#
# "Forty-eight percent of Cambodia's Christians were killed
# because of their religion."
#
http://i279.photobucket.com/albums/kk158/CANDEMIELDA/44camboyano.jpg

#
#
# "the state established atheism as the only scientific truth."
# - Daniel Peris,
# "Storming the Heavens: The Soviet League of the Militant Godless"
# Cornell University Press 1998 ISBN 9780801434853
#
#
# "State atheism has been mostly implemented in communist
# countries, such as the former Soviet Union,[1] China,
# Communist Albania, Communist Afghanistan, North Korea,
# Communist Mongolia and Poland under communist rule also
# promoted state atheism and suppressed religion.
# - Forced out: the fate of Polish Jewry in Communist Poland.
# Wolak, Arthur J. p 104
#
# In these nations, the governments viewed atheism as an
# intrinsic part of communist ideology.



> <snip

You faded fast, lightweight..

Snip, run and Lie ... the atheist Trinity

>> “Down with religion and long live atheism;
>> the dissemination of atheist views is our chief task!”
>> - Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)
>>

>> > But to imply that atheism,
>>
>> *I* don't imply it you fucking shitpig apologist for atheist KILLERS..
>> THEY FRANKLY ADMIT IT...


B^D No wonder the devious lying atheists snip the
facts and the rational argument!

>>> rather than political ideology, was their
>>> motivating factor,

Atheistic communism IS a political ideology, you moron!

>> you are not a fucking MINDREADER, NOR ARE YOU GOD!
>>
>> YOU do NOT read the hearts of men..
>>
>> THEY SAY YOU ARE FULL OF SHIT:

>>
>> "Atheism is the natural and inseparable part of Communism."
>> -Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)

Q.E.D.

I'm not arguing they are RIGHT, just that they believe it,
and act on those beliefs in violent anti-theist pogroms.

Even today, the atheists give tacit support to the
SAME hate filled, anti-theist, atheist agenda:

# From: Steve Knight <skni...@cox.net>
# Newsgroups: alt.atheism
# Subject: A.A. BAAWA - FAQ
# Message-ID: <p8mrb5lvaf0cj5bp1...@4ax.com>
# Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 02:46:34 -0700
#
# We kill theists and shit down their throats
#
# Warlord Steve
# BAAWA

Not satisfied with murder, Steve and his BAAWA thugs favour
GENOCIDE, the murder of ever Muslim man, woman and child for
nothing more than believing in God:

# From: Steve Knight <skni...@cox.net>

# Newsgroups: alt.atheism,alt.religion.islam
# Subject: Re: Islam: the perfect religion and way of life for all
# Message-ID: <8t6ve5hs41qn3a2rv...@4ax.com>
# Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2009 18:58:18 -0800
#
# On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 21:22:32 +0200, "Katrina"
# <blondes_g...@yahoo.com> wrote:
#
# >Islam: the perfect religion and way of life for all
#
# It is the most foul, disgusting filth on Earth.
# The sooner we nuke you fuckers, the better.

#
# Warlord Steve
# BAAWA

BAAWA- Brutal Atheist Animals Without Agape, and all of alt.atheism
are complicit, never denouncing these psychopaths, who are their Shock
Troops.

Little has changed since the atheist holocausts, all in living memory,
except one thing.. atheists can't get elected to POWER anywhere..! B^p

http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:17475?context=latest


>> Giving us YOUR DUMBFUCK atheist-apologist-for-terror OPINIONS
>>
>>> is almost breathtakingly retarded
>>
>> and is simply the No True Atheist fallacy in action!

>>
>>>> http://groups.google.com.au/group/alt.religion/msg/f2dad4783c9d6a57?hl=en
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Look, you just claimed that *I* am "just as much an atheist as any
>>>> Communist leader in history"
>>>

>>> You don't believe in any god/s,
>>
>> How do you know?

It's a question the atheist Liars can't answer
because it's just another of their INDEFINSIBLE SLANDERS.

Keep snipping and running, you gutless Pravda Propagandists,

You can't even defend your FABRICATIONS, let alone provide proof
when challenged.

There are no ethics or morality in Atheism


>> It's a private matter.
>>
>> I'm an agnostic, One who acknowledges that the non-existence
>> of God cannot be proven, but there is no conclusive proof
>> for the existence of God, (although much circumstantial
>> evidence exists). That has nothing to do with BELIEFS,
>> and I may or may not have some.
>> Which is none of your fucking business, it's private matter.
>>
>> Of course just as you atheist thugs force those who HAVE beliefs
>> to hide them in fear, no doubt you will also want to torture
>> and terrorise people to reveal their personal beliefs!
>>
>> Lenin said, and then demonstrated

>> “Down with religion and long live atheism;
>> the dissemination of atheist views is our chief task!”
>> - Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin
>>

>> I reject 'down with religion and long live atheism'
>> I reject atheism's historical crimes against humanity,
>> I reject it's contemporary dogmatism and snide contempt,
>>
>> I reject atheism.. but as you do with babies and monkeys
>> and trees and the COMATOSE and Brain Dead, and DOG SHIT
>> and ANYTHING ELSE that CAN'T THINK FOR ITSELF, so you INSIST
>> that it's ATHEIST..
>>
>> SO YOU TOTALITARIAN SHITPIGS WILL CONTINUE TO TRY AND **FORCE**
>> YOUR STINKING ATHEIST EXCREMENT ONTO ME, and others.
>>
>>> so yes, you are.
>>
>> You poor desperate deluded fuckstains.. you can't defend
>> your own beliefs but you want to FORCE THEM DOWN OTHER PEOPLES
>> THROATS..

See how they RUN! B^]


>> Just like the atheist regimes did, with terror, torture and MASS MURDER.
>>
>> Thank God you have no power, and never will!

>>
>>>> You lied, I'm *not* an atheist
>>>

>>> Do you believe in any god/s?
>>
>> I'm an agnostic.. go fuck yourself, Stalin!
>>
>>
>> So, do you have an ounce of respect for HUMAN RIGHTS?
>>
>>> No
>>
>> THEN FUCK OFF AND DIE!
>>
>>> You're an atheist.
>>
>> You're a lying atheist cock sucker.. now what will you do?
>>
>>> Suck it up,
>>
>> just like a little atheist
>>
>>> bitch.

>>>> , but EVERY
>>>> LEADER OF EVERY ATHEISTS STATE -Lenin, Stalin, Mao, and Pol Pot-
>>>> WERE "just as much atheist as communist!!!
>>

>> None of them were agnostics.. no blood on my hands, dipshit!
>>
>>> Yet you blame atheism
>>> for Communist atrocities,
>>
>> Because the atheists who did it made CLEAR that atheism WAS THEIR
>> REASON, THEIR MOTIVE for the FORCED indoctrination of children
>> with.. wait for it.. ATHEISM!
>>
>> How fucking STUPID are you..? I think 'not very..' I think you are
>> actually just an EVIL APOLOGIST for those atheist KILLERS!
>>
>>> a self-loathing hypocrite

>>>
>>>> And so, how can YOU 'attribute' those deaths COMMITTED by
>>>> atheists to political motives, not atheism when the atheists
>>>> who carried them out explicitly declared they were ATHEIST
>>>> policies, executed in the NAME OF Atheism.
>>>>
>>>> "Atheism is the natural and inseparable part of Communism."
>>>> -Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)
>>>>
>>>> "We must combat religion"
>>>> -Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)
>>

>> That is Marxism-Leninism, Marxism infused with Lenin's atheist
>> anti-theism.
>>>
>> Here is what YOU dishonestly left out in your deliberate attempt
>> to MISREPRESENT what Lenin was saying:
>>
>> "The combating of religion cannot be *confined* to abstract ideological
>> preaching, and it must not be *reduced* to such preaching."
>>
>> Got that!? COMBATING RELIGION is the ISSUE, the question is HOW! B^]
>>
>> Lenin is not a coffee house Marxist, he won't confine the combat
>> to mere TALK, "ABSTRACT PREACHING".. he wants ACTION!!
>>
>> 'concrete practice'
>>
>> that's why the REPRESSION of religion
>> Under Marxism- LENINISM was so much more VIOLENT than in Vietnam
>> or Cuba the atheism was made ACTIVE..
>>
>> " It must be linked up with the *concrete practice* of the class
>> movement, which aims at eliminating the social roots of religion"
>>
>> and so the Red terror went out and killed priests.
>>
>> You simply CAN'T MISREPRESENT the FACTS.. the *actions*
>> which show your misrepresentation of the theory is wrong.
>>
>> "No educational book can eradicate religion.. "
>>
>> that was still the goal of Lenin!

IN HIS OWN WORDS!

Mass Murder, crimes against humanity killing over 60,000,000
people IN THE NAME OF ATHEISM!

>> ". ...until those masses themselves learn to *fight* this root of
>> religion, "
>>
>> "atheist *propaganda* must be subordinated to its basic task—the
>> development of the *class struggle*"
>>
>> LENIN MUSCLED UP THE BOVVER BOYS.. no bourgeois sloganeering
>> and chanting.. he rejected mere 'preaching' of atheism
>>
>>
>> Ravin, it's absurd for you to argue that Lenin was actually PRO-religion and
>> ANTI-atheist, when all his words, read in context, AND his ACTIONS, PROVE
>> the OPPOSITE.
>>
>> The Soviet press did NOT run against Lenin, or Stalin's, Party Line!
>>
>> “Let us drive out the Capitalists from the earth,
>> and God from Heaven!” (early Soviet slogan)
>>
>> # "the state established atheism as the only scientific truth."
>> # - Daniel Peris,
>> # "Storming the Heavens: The Soviet League of the Militant Godless"
>> # Cornell University Press 1998 ISBN 9780801434853

>>
>>
>>
>>>>
>>>> "Our program necessarily includes the propaganda of atheism."
>>>> - Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)
>>
>>
>>>>
>>>> You are an atheist apologist for the acts of atheist states,
>>>

>>> That is an absolute lie on your part.
>>
>> We see you here doing just that!

An apologist is one who EXCUSES the crimes of others,
as you can all wee Raven doing here, in defence of atheism.

Their argument is simplistic and idiotic, that the actions of the
atheists does not match what they say about themselves. pfffft

The Nazis never said "we put Jews in Gas Chambers" they covered it up too.

>> An apologia based on Ignoring the FACTS ;
>>
>>>> terrorising, torturing and killing theists, destroying

>>>> their temples and churches and synagogues, and forcibly indoctrinating
>>>> children in ATHEISM in the schools.
>>
>>

>> No comment, you loathsome liar!?


They always run when their lies are demolished.

>>>> Actions of the atheist leadership, every member of the ruling politburo
>>>> an atheist, actively implementing EXPLICIT State Atheist policies, in
>>>> the name of atheism.
>>>

>>> You can repeat the last five words until you are blue in the face, but
>>> that will not make them true.
>>
>> What makes the atheist tyrants words true is their actions.
>>
>> The same thing that makes your words false
>>
>>
>> "Criticism of atheism was strictly forbidden"
>>
>> "Between 1917 and 1940, 130,000 Orthodox priests were arrested.
>> In 1918, the Cheka under Felix Dzerzhinsky executed over
>> 3000 Orthodox clergymen of all ranks.
>> Some were drowned in ice-holes or poured over with cold water
>> in winter until they turned to ice-pillars."
>>
>> John Shelton Curtis, The Russian Church and the Soviet State
>> (Boston: Little Brown, 1953)
>>
>> Ravin is a liar, atheism was the driving force for these
>> Crimes against humanity, Lenin cranked it up from the
>> theoretical and abstract 'preaching' of Marx, and
>> ARMED IT WITH TERROR for the 'class struggle' and Ravin's
>> attempt to whitewash
>> the atheist tyranny is an insult to all those dead theists.

[fasgnadh]

On 30/01/2012 8:44 AM, Olrik wrote:
> Le 2012-01-29 02:41, felix_unger a écrit :
>> On 29-January-2012 4:45 PM, Olrik wrote:
>>

Olrik claims he has a Divine Right to lie about you
if he doesn't know the truth(which is always):

# From: Olrik <olri...@yahoo.com>

# Newsgroups: alt.atheism,alt.agnosticism,alt.religion
# Subject: Re: fasgnadh is defective
# Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2010 18:31:59 -0400

# Message-ID: <huh7l5$tss$1...@news.eternal-september.org>

#
# I can claim whatever I want. One day I say you're an atheist,
# then I claim you're a muslim.

Sure, Olrik, it's called BEING A LIAR, whom no one can trust. B^]

# From: Olrik <olri...@yahoo.com>
# Newsgroups: alt.abortion,alt.atheism
# Subject: Re: fasgnadh is an atheist
# Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2009 00:49:38 -0500
# Message-ID: <hd5m8q$91a$1...@news.eternal-september.org>
#
# fasgnadh is an atheist.

# From: Olrik <olri...@yahoo.com>
# Newsgroups:

alt.atheism,alt.religion,alt.religion.Islam,alt.politics.republicans
# Subject: Re: The new video from Pat Condell -- fasgnadh is a muslim
# Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2010 01:13:01 -0400
# Message-ID: <hufap5$ghh$1...@news.eternal-september.org>
#
# Oh look!
#
# It's fasgnadh, a.a.'s very own islamist!

# From: Olrik <olri...@yahoo.com>
# Newsgroups:

alt.atheism,alt.agnosticism,alt.religion.christian,alt.religion.islam,alt.religion
# Subject: Re: Communist states - the Historical Reality
# Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2010 01:12:48 -0400
# Message-ID: <hucmco$5v5$1...@news.eternal-september.org>
#
# fasgnadh is still an atheist, and the poor thing still refuses to
admit it.


# Newsgroups: alt.atheism,talk.atheism,alt.agnosticism,alt.usenet.kooks
# Subject: Re: Atheist liars Syd Moron, China Glue and Olrik the
# Unworthy unable to show proof of a lie -
# demonstrates their absence of honesty... again! B^D
# Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 14:27:26 -0700 (PDT)
#Message-ID:<01b9d8cf-d902-4fea...@y17g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>
#
# On 31 Mrz., 22:54, fasgnadh <fasgn...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
# > Olrik joins the atheist liar tag team B^D :
#
# Fagsnag
#
# he's a closet theist.


# From: Olrik <olri...@yahoo.com>
# Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 16:28:41 -0400
# Message-ID: <hp0b9v$ols$1...@news.eternal-september.org>
#
# fasgnadh,why don't you once and for all admit that you're an atheist ?
#
# It'd be the right thing to do.


One atheist tried to warn Olrik the Unworthy
that he wa making a fool of himself, but he's too
foolish to listen:

# From: raven1 <quoththera...@nevermore.com>
# Newsgroups: alt.atheism,talk.atheism,alt.religion,
# alt.politics.republicans,alt.politics.democrats,
# uk.politics.misc,aus.politics,alt.politics.communism
# Subject: Re: The Decline of alt atheism - and time to say farewell to
the most trivial and useless branch of Nihilism! B^D
# Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 16:26:06 -0400

^^^^^^

# Message-ID: <n4ofb51jvj209trfh...@4ax.com>
#
# > Dear old "fasgnadh" asserts his deity exists, but can't prove it.
#
# Fasgnadh has never asserted that a deity exists, and recently admitted
# to being agnostic. He's not here to push a deity, he's here to push
# peoples buttons.

Olriks button requires hardly any effort:

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_9tsuLU0jfPU/S_vwUo7hMeI/AAAAAAAAAEY/RonfSYNOVbw/s1600/easy-button.jpg



When I push it he carries on for DAYS till he runs down,

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_73NU6OlNuw


then I just WIND HIM UP AGAIN!

BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHHAAHAAA



Just ONE MORE lie, from the masters of ad hom, slander
and libel, the atheists:

>>> For years, "fasgnadh" has demonstrated its atheism, yet it's failed to
>>> publicly acknowledged it.

I have been open from the outset about all the facts,
no one has to debate YOUR FANTASIES!

>>> The question is: is "fasgnadh" an atheist,
>>
>> no. he's too smart for that, he wouldn't be that stupid

Od course not, atheists are always jealous of us agnostics,
we OUTNUMBER them, but are not shrill hysterics like they are,
nor are we responsible for tyrannies killing over 60,000,000,
we are smarter, run rings around them as you have observed,
are more decent and polite, towards believers and atheists
alike, and we sleep between silk sheets with women of such
indescribably beauty and goodness that their gentle touch
melts hearts of concrete, or at least some of us do. ;-)

> Ask him if he believes in "god". See where that will go.

Where that will go is where it always goes, I told you,
raven told you, and EVEN YOU told you, (50% of the times
you contradicted yourself), that I'm an agnostic, and explained
that it is the default logical position when

The non existence of God CANNOT be logically proven
(no evidence for atheism exists) and while there is evidence
for God, a great deal of historical evidence, there is no
ABSOLUTE CONCLUSIVE PROOF. and so we agnostics deal in
REALITY, we objectively observe and discuss the ACTIONS
of both theists and atheists, and while theism has some
ugly historical warts, it has also produced great and enduring
civilisations, brilliant science, arts, philosophy and social
justice, whereas atheism hasn't, every atheist state has been
a totalitarian disaster,

We agnostics deal in SUCH REALITIES, not in the theological and
ideological speculations of the theists and the atheists respectively.

I mean, the atheist dogma is just undergraduate nonsense, as their
'greatest'(sic) theologian, Prophet Dawkins (these atheist "Gods came
into being"...) demonstrates:

[felix_unger]

On 30-January-2012 10:46 AM, fasgnadh wrote:

> On 30/01/2012 8:44 AM, Olrik wrote:
>> Le 2012-01-29 02:41, felix_unger a écrit :
>>> On 29-January-2012 4:45 PM, Olrik wrote:
>>>> The question is: is "fasgnadh" an atheist,
>>>
>>> no. he's too smart for that, he wouldn't be that stupid
>
> Od course not, atheists are always jealous of us agnostics,
> we OUTNUMBER them, but are not shrill hysterics like they are,
> nor are we responsible for tyrannies killing over 60,000,000,
> we are smarter, run rings around them as you have observed,
> are more decent and polite, towards believers and atheists
> alike, and we sleep between silk sheets with women of such
> indescribably beauty and goodness that their gentle touch
> melts hearts of concrete, or at least some of us do. ;-)

the lucky ones!..

>
>> Ask him if he believes in "god". See where that will go.
>
> Where that will go is where it always goes, I told you,
> raven told you, and EVEN YOU told you, (50% of the times
> you contradicted yourself), that I'm an agnostic, and explained
> that it is the default logical position when
>
> The non existence of God CANNOT be logically proven
> (no evidence for atheism exists) and while there is evidence
> for God, a great deal of historical evidence, there is no
> ABSOLUTE CONCLUSIVE PROOF. and so we agnostics deal in
> REALITY, we objectively observe and discuss the ACTIONS
> of both theists and atheists, and while theism has some
> ugly historical warts, it has also produced great and enduring
> civilisations, brilliant science, arts, philosophy and social
> justice, whereas atheism hasn't, every atheist state has been
> a totalitarian disaster,
>
> We agnostics deal in SUCH REALITIES, not in the theological and
> ideological speculations of the theists and the atheists respectively.
>
>

correct. agnosticism is the most logical, the most realistic, the most
honest, and the most common sense of positions. It's the position with
nothing to hide, nothing to defend, and nothing to apologise for.


--
rgds,

Pete
-------
“We sensible agnostics laugh in your general direction”

“Agnostics frustrate the hell out of atheists because they have no target to fire at”

“I'll take a position on the existence of God, when you can tell me why I have to”

“Atheists have tunnel vision. There's so much they don't see”

"It's unwise to commit to a belief without proof"

“Snip, run and Lie ... the atheist Trinity”

The atheists moral dilema .. http://altatheismfaq.blogspot.com/

“Atheist NG's are endless posturing, ad hom bitch fights and little else, they are parasitic, sustained by the creative attacks of their opponents and their ritualised, scripted, responses. The vacuum occurs because they only have ONE idea, and that is a mere denial that something exists, an impotent, ineffectual, useless sub branch of Nihilism, not enough to sustain an interesting after dinner chat, let alone a great and enduring civilisation”

“Hypocrisy and irrationality are the only terms which can appropriately describe the atheist obsessions with critiquing others who don't share their non-belief “

“It is absurd self delusion for atheists to claim that they alone should be judged by their self-defining, self-serving, propaganda, rather than the REAL WORLD actions and consequences of atheism throughout history”

"It is a sure thing that science will prove abiogenesis before creationism can disprove Evolution"

"I argue for TRUTH against error, wherever it is found. Those not interested in HONEST rational discussion and debate should just bugger off!"

[fasgnadh]

On 31/01/2012 6:48 AM, Peter J Ross wrote:
> In alt.usenet.kooks on Fri, 27 Jan 2012 18:28:32 -0600, Friendly

> Neighborhood Vote Wrangler<fn...@databasix.com> wrote:
>

>> On 28 Jan 2012 00:14:16 GMT, Peter J Ross<p...@example.invalid> wrote
>> in<slrnji6fe...@peterjross.me.uk>:
>>
>>> In alt.usenet.kooks on Fri, 27 Jan 2012 04:01:54 -0600, Friendly

>>> Neighborhood Vote Wrangler<fn...@databasix.com> wrote:
>>>

>>>> I'll give the idea some more thought. Of course, input from the
>>>> denizens of alt.usenet.kooks is always welcome.
>>>
>>> Heh. There's nobody posting here who can give you as useful "input" as
>>> I, but you persist in ignoring my advice.
>>
>> Untrue. I do value and take into consideration your advice. However,
>> this is 2012, not 2003/2004. Times have changed, and a FNVW must
>> change with the times and be cognizant of the will of the people, i.e.
>> the denizens of alt.usenet.kooks.
>>
>>>
>>>> I suppose I could run
>>>> it as a non-binding straw poll, with only Bobo winners (Emmett and
>>>> Patrick Michael Sullivan aka @) and obvious socks excluded.
>>>
>>> There are probably equally kooky things you could do, such as running
>>> naked through the suburbs with the wild wind in your hair.
>>
>> Peter, all appreciate your hard work during your tenure as FNVW, but
>> you are beginning to come across as a bitter and vengeful FNVWE. You
>> had the chance to revive the awards and chose not to do so. The torch
>> has passed, and it's a new dawn in AUK. Deal with it.
>
> Oh, you are so not the FNWV!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1!!!!!!!!!!!! LOL

He and the Bland Lizard, Crusty Tavek are Kook frauds and imposters.

Lemon of Mockery is actually an atheist stooge,
as the alt.atheism FAQ shows:

http://altatheismfaq.blogspot.com/ click on Members

Which explains the character assassination attempts on the most
effective critics of militant atheist kooks, by hijacking
and corrupting the Kook awards process.

They should be nominated.. I would but I'm too busy,
walking the dog, doing my hair, .. more important stuff! B^D

Never trust Kooks whose entire lives are their imaginary
role playing in USENET! B^D


The Kooks are taking over the Asylum! B^D

[fasgnadh]

On 30/01/2012 1:18 PM, DanielSan wrote:
> On 1/29/2012 6:17 PM, felix_unger wrote:

>> On 30-January-2012 8:44 AM, Olrik wrote:
>>
>>> Le 2012-01-29 02:41, felix_unger a écrit :
>>>> On 29-January-2012 4:45 PM, Olrik wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>

>>>>> For years, "fasgnadh" has demonstrated its atheism, yet it's failed to
>>>>> publicly acknowledged it.
>>>>>

>>>>> The question is: is "fasgnadh" an atheist,
>>>>
>>>> no. he's too smart for that, he wouldn't be that stupid
>>>

>>> Ask him if he believes in "god". See where that will go.
>>

>> He's agnostic. like me! :)
>>
>> Bonne journée!
>
> But does he /believe/ in "god"?
> "I'm agnostic" is not an answer to that
> question.

"I'm agnostic" is the ONLY rational answer, unless you atheists
can PROVE there is no God, or Theists PROVE there is.

Agnosticism is based on what we KNOW and CAN KNOW,
you atheists, influenced it seems by your Prophet Dawkins,
are obsessed with BELIEF, your own UNFOUNDED ones and those
of other people. You are a nosy busybodies in metaphysics,
but you are totalitarian, trying to TELL OTHERS what they
are!

If your belief, like Prophet Dawkin's below is not based
on evidence, is not something you can know, then what
good is talking to others about it? Because you do not
have a listening ear, you are a crude materialist.

For example, I may speak of love, my children love me.
I love them. I cannot prove to you that they love me.

I could tell you the things they do, the affection they give, the
consideration they show, but if you do not understand love, don't
speak the language, think kindness and affection are myths, that people
simply do what will gain them most, then knowing you are anti-love
I would not wish to offend you by speaking of it.

Why would you ask about it.. I know that if I speak of Love
you will mock it and sully it.

# From: Budikka666 <budi...@netscape.net>
# Newsgroups:
alt.atheism,alt.religion,alt.religion.christian,alt.agnosticism
# Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 03:38:16 -0800 (PST)
# Message-ID:
<bfcf3a9d-9711-449a...@m3g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>
#
# You can keep your spiritual values.
# I'll piss on them and pass on them.
#
# Budikka

Atheists just piss on the beliefs of others, so why would
anyone cast pearls before atheist swine?

You atheists will just do what you always do,
fabricate a straw man, hold a show trial and
execute them;

Olrik claims he has a Divine Right to lie about you
if he doesn't know the truth(which is always):

# From: Olrik <olri...@yahoo.com>
# Newsgroups: alt.atheism,alt.agnosticism,alt.religion
# Subject: Re: fasgnadh is defective
# Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2010 18:31:59 -0400
# Message-ID: <huh7l5$tss$1...@news.eternal-september.org>
#
# I can claim whatever I want. One day I say you're an atheist,
# then I claim you're a muslim.

Sure, Olrik, it's called BEING A LIAR, whom no one can trust. B^]

Just ONE MORE lie, from the masters of ad hom, slander
and libel, the atheists:

The only reason you want to know peoples beliefs is
to refine your mockery to make is as hurt-full as possible.

Thus when replying to Christians at Easter atheists refer
to Jesus on a stick, Muslims they make reference to cooking
a Koran in pig fat.. and so on.

You are disgustingly intolerant and hateful, and so
for three years I have been teaching you some manners,
many have graduated and left to lead normal lives, only
the hard cases are left, chronic liars, congenital slanderers
atheist whose every expelled breath is a lie, or a curse;


# From: "John Fraser" <jfr...@ns.sympatico.ca>
# Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.pentecostal,alt.atheism
# Subject: Merry Christmas
# Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2008 10:21:03 -0400
# Message-ID: <4953abb6$1$5460$9a56...@news.aliant.net>
#
# Hello Folks;
#
# I'd like to wish all of you a very Merry Christmas
# and a safe holiday season. Phil 4:8.
#
# Cheers,
# John



# From: Christopher A. Lee <ca...@optonline.net>
# Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.pentecostal,alt.atheism
# Subject: Re: Merry Christmas
# Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 16:24:01 -0500
# Message-ID: <o07dl41sa4t4jhof3...@4ax.com>
#
# "go fuck yourself with your crucifix in a drill chuck'.

So, aren't atheists strange folk, first they assign the
answer they want to you.. then later, they ask the question,
and ignore your real answer. B^D

Here they are, prisoners of their fantasies:

Danielsan is now wired to the same Button!

In more recent answers I outlined the usual discussion on
agnosticism as the default rational position, etc..
but planted a seed of ambiguity by saying belief is a private matter,
one could be an agnostic about Alien life in the Universe,
but secretly believe it.... no one need know.

And of course now they are all full of curiosity and
want to know my beliefs.. B^]

and of course because they are such moral shitpigs, so rude
and spiteful, so ugly in their intolerance and hateful spite..
everyone is just RUSHING to confide in them!

BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAAA

When the HELL they strive to create for others on Earth FREEZES OVER!

B^]

http://www.munseys.com/diskfive/whiphand.jpg


http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_a9V8a7WTTz0/S85Wgn4DqeI/AAAAAAAABCg/JM6Ezu_sFAA/s1600/The+Whip+Hand.jpg

[Peter J Ross]

In alt.usenet.kooks on Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:37:28 +1100, fasgnadh

That was quite lucid. Well done.

Delusional, but quite lucid.

--
PJR :-)
μέτρα φυλάσσεσθαι: καιρὸς δ' ἐπὶ πᾶσιν ἄριστος. (Hesiod)

[fasgnadh]

On 2/02/2012 8:57 AM, Rusty Tavek wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2/1/12 2:59 PM, in article slrnjij6d...@peterjross.me.uk, "Peter J
> Ross"<p...@example.invalid> wrote:
>
>> In alt.usenet.kooks on Mon, 30 Jan 2012 23:36:58 +0000 (UTC), Rusty
>> Tavek<grand...@safe-mail.net.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> I suspected this was staged
>>
>> No, you didn't.
>>
>> It was among the most transparent trolls ever attempted, but you
>> swallowed the hook like it was Cap'n Neal's semen.
>>
>> In fact, you've yet to spit the hook out completely.
>>
>> Tee hee.
>
> I frequently work with developmentally disabled children.

usually crying because their finger-painting is more sophisticated
than yours.

> simple youngsters like to pretend they are cowboys, soldiers or
> knights in shining armor

or

> The Grand Wizard

BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAAHAAAAAA!

> I fall to the floor writhing like I have been mortally wounded

You self-inflate .. I puncture hubris

...it's symbiosis.

> my heart is touched

you are pointing at your head! B^D


> Two of my favorite special children are named P**** and F***.

Whoop Whoop! Rockspider alert!

(names supressed to protect the innocent

> given to wearing a 10-gallon hat and making inappropriate advances

> The looks of glee on their slope-browed little faces

> Making their beady little eyes sparkle like the sequins on my blazer
> is what makes me get up in the morning
> (well, that, coffee and sweaty well hung wrestlers

> The Grand Wizard of AUK has spoken. Thank you all for listening.

[fasgnadh]

Thanks, but I discourage the Cult of Personality.

I think the Bland Lizard and his Monkey are looking
for sycophants, and they already have their costumes on..

perhaps if you queue outside their Theatre of the Absurd
with the other groupies...

[fasgnadh]

On 28/01/2012 5:19 PM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Jan 2012 21:32:35 -0800, Colonel Jake
> <colon...@coloneljake.com> wrote in<jg019l$s5$1...@dont-email.me>:

>
>> On 1/27/2012 4:28 PM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler wrote:
>>> On 28 Jan 2012 00:14:16 GMT, Peter J Ross<p...@example.invalid> wrote
>>> in<slrnji6fe...@peterjross.me.uk>:
>>>
>>>> In alt.usenet.kooks on Fri, 27 Jan 2012 04:01:54 -0600, Friendly
>>>> Neighborhood Vote Wrangler<fn...@databasix.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I'll give the idea some more thought. Of course, input from the
>>>>> denizens of alt.usenet.kooks is always welcome.
>>>>
>>>> Heh. There's nobody posting here who can give you as useful "input" as
>>>> I, but you persist in ignoring my advice.
>>>
>>> Untrue. I do value and take into consideration your advice. However,
>>> this is 2012, not 2003/2004. Times have changed, and a FNVW must
>>> change with the times and be cognizant of the will of the people, i.e.
>>> the denizens of alt.usenet.kooks.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> I suppose I could run
>>>>> it as a non-binding straw poll, with only Bobo winners (Emmett and
>>>>> Patrick Michael Sullivan aka @) and obvious socks excluded.
>>>>
>>>> There are probably equally kooky things you could do, such as running
>>>> naked through the suburbs with the wild wind in your hair.
>>>
>>> Peter, all appreciate your hard work during your tenure as FNVW, but
>>> you are beginning to come across as a bitter and vengeful FNVWE. You
>>> had the chance to revive the awards and chose not to do so. The torch
>>> has passed, and it's a new dawn in AUK. Deal with it.
>>>
>>

>> But! but!! but!!!,
>> "AUK is still Peter's and Sean's Newsfroup!!!..."
>
> Jake, both of them abandoned their post.

It's called Getting a Life. B^]

> At least Peter gave a notice.
> Sean just disappeared,

You seem to have abandonment issues?

How has it affected you

> failing to discharge

ah, that explains the impotent rage.

YOu need to Separate from the Parental Units and Grow UP..

> If either of them truly gave a shit

Look, that's their natural disdain from knowing you well.

> about the awards, we would not
> have had this nearly three year interregnum.

Three years of inconsequential waiting seems to have
defined your USENET presence.

> As far as alt.usenet.kooks being *their* group, only Giggle Gropes
> considers AUK *their* group. Take that how you wish


I take it as indicating a defunct bunch of whining losers..
with the s-l-o-w-e-s-t to wake up still wearing their costumes
and endlessly replaying the same old script..

"We have some stock insults, who shall we randomly hang them on"

is there any other take possible?

>> <All Hail to Peter's and Sean's Newsfroup! All Hail!>

Endlessly acting out Biggus Dickus, how quaint! B^D

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2K8_jgiNqUc

[Vurgil]

In article <hb_Wq.2588$v14...@viwinnwfe02.internal.bigpond.com>,
fasgnadh <fasg...@yahoo.com> wrote:


> Ex- Atheist, now Prophet,

And still atheist, to those who understand his wit,

> Richard Dawkins claims a "superpowerful intelligent and moral energy"

> entity, "God-like", is plausible and could have 'evolved' somewhere
> in the Universe "by an EXPLICABLE [emphaisi added] scientific

> progression of incremental evolution", (which no atheist can
> explain).

If it is explicable, it is explainable, at least by those atheists who
understand English.

>
> "After two hours of conversation, Professor Dawkins walks far afield.

> He talks of the possibility that we might co-evolve with computers, a

> silicon destiny. And he’s intrigued by the playful, even soul-stirring

> writings of Freeman Dyson, the theoretical physicist.
>

> 'In one essay, Professor Dyson casts millions of speculative years

> into the future. Our galaxy is dying and humans have evolved into

> something like bolts of superpowerful intelligent and moral energy.
>

> Doesn’t that description sound an awful lot like God?
>

> "Certainly," Professor Dawkins replies. "It’s highly plausible that

> in the universe there are God-like creatures."
>

> He raises his hand, just in case a reader thinks he’s gone around a

> religious bend. "It’s very important to understand that these Gods

> came into being by an explicable scientific progression of

> incremental evolution."'

>
> Could they be immortal? The professor shrugs.
>

> “Probably not.” He smiles and adds, “But I

> wouldn’t want to be too dogmatic about that.”"
>
>
> http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/20/science/20dawkins.html?pagewanted=al
> l
>
>
> So, which atheist is going to explain the inexplicable, unscientific,
> BELIEF in "these {atheist] Gods", with no proof whatsoever, and show
> us the evidence of how, and where, God evolved?

Dawkins himself says they are explicable! Can't you read English?
>

[Vurgil]

In article <yC_Wq.2759$%E2....@viwinnwfe01.internal.bigpond.com>,

fasgnadh <fasg...@yahoo.com> wrote:


> Ex- Atheist,

Now super atheist!

>> "After two hours of conversation, Professor Dawkins walks far
afield.

> He talks of the possibility that we might co-evolve with computers, a

> silicon destiny. And he零 intrigued by the playful, even soul-stirring

> writings of Freeman Dyson, the theoretical physicist.
>

> 'In one essay, Professor Dyson casts millions of speculative years

> into the future. Our galaxy is dying and humans have evolved into

> something like bolts of superpowerful intelligent and moral energy.
>

> Doesn靖 that description sound an awful lot like God?
>
> "Certainly," Professor Dawkins replies. "It零 highly plausible that

> in the universe there are God-like creatures."
>

> He raises his hand, just in case a reader thinks he零 gone around a
> religious bend. "It零 very important to understand that these Gods
> came into being by an EXPLICABLE scientific progression of
> incremental evolution."'

>
> http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/20/science/20dawkins.html?pagewanted=all
>
>
> So, which atheist is going to explain the inexplicable...

Why fasgnadh misreads Dawkins explicitly "explicable" to mean
"inexplicable" is inexplicable.

Unless he is deliberately lying.

[Colonel Jake]

Usually! (fagnar),
"Those who poast YouTube videos about 'CoCK' and
such, are those who usually wish they can just get
past teh 'loose part' of their girlfriends or wife
every time they FuCK'EM, but seeing very little
of the video you poasted? I'd take that as
your 'BoYISH-FRiENDS!!!.' .."

*YoU aZZ-FuCKING-FaG-MaGGOT*

You want to talk about DiCK!,
"Take teh one outta' your mouth first!!! (CoCK-SuCKER)..."

<from Teh BoOk of Colonel Jake'ster>
*teh way of teh Atheist, and teh Puritan*
Colonel Jake 10:27 - "If it aint goOd enough for me?!?!?!,....,
``````` 'then it aint goOd enough for anybody!!!.' .." ´´´´´´´
```````''' {°v°} '''´´´´´´´

[fasgnadh]

On 31/01/2012 6:15 PM, felix_unger wrote:
> On 31-January-2012 12:58 AM, raven1 wrote:

>
>> On Sun, 29 Jan 2012 00:45:54 -0500, Olrik<olri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>> For years, "fasgnadh" has demonstrated its atheism, yet it's failed to
>>> publicly acknowledged it.
>>>

>>> The question is: is "fasgnadh" an atheist, or

is each of the atheists who can't debate him, but instead
huddle together for mutual tool-fondling and to whine ABOUT him..

>>> a mentally deficient degenerate?

You be the judge, but USE the EVIDENCE, not the
unfounded OPINIONS, baseless lies and slanders atheists rely on..


>>> Bear in mind that the question is not a false dichotomy.

True, you can be atheist and a mentally deficient degenerate,
... in fact it appears to be the norm.

>> Whatever the case, he is an absolutely shameless liar. It's not even
>> worth responding to him, he'll just snip any rebuttal, and repeat the
>> same lies ad nauseam.
>
> The facts do not support that claim, quite the contrary

Of course not, but that's how atheists 'mass-debate',
they don't engage in debate WITH you, they just form one of those
Maoist 'Re-Education' circles and all agree that they are right! B^D

[fasgnadh]

On 25/01/2012 4:11 AM, raven1 wrote:

Bukakke ran, conceding the point

>>>>> we do hate and will fight to the death
>>>>
>>>> Unfortunately it's always your victims doing the dying;
>>>> as was the case of the atheist states terror, torture and
>>>> mass murder of over 60,000,000 OF THEIR OWN PEOPLE!
>>>>
>>
>> Atheists can't refute the facts, in fact, the atheist source
>> cited by Trance Gemini, your Whorelords personal whore, already admitted
>> the horrific death toll from the atheist holocausts;
>>
>> # From: Kilmir <kil...@gmail.com>
>> # Newsgroups: alt.agnosticism,alt.atheism,alt.religion.christian,
>> # alt.usenet.kooks
>> # Subject: Re: is religion really the answer? Not if the question is
>> # "What killed 60,000,000 in the last 100 years"
>> # - ATHEIST REGIMES DID IT! 8^o
>> # Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 03:39:48 -0700 (PDT)
>> # Message-ID:
>> <042262dc-a546-4054...@b9g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>
>> #
>> #
>> http://teapotatheism.blogspot.com/2008/06/anonymous-wanted-body-count-total-so-he.html
>>
>> #
>> # atheists have caused almost a whopping 100 million deaths throughout
>> # world history.

Bukakke ran, conceding the point

>> BTW, Trance Stupor was one of my first atheist scalps,
>> she abandoned Warlord Steve and left him the broken husk
>> you see today..
>>
>>>>> Got that now
>>>>
>>>> Good, when will we see atheists say sorry, like the church
>>>> has done for bullying Galileo?
>>
>> Instead, Chicken Bukkake does the atheist standard response:
>>
>> Snip the facts presented, Run from the evidence, and LIE.
>>

Bukakke ran, conceding the point

>>>> And how does the MUCH MORE TERRIBLE death toll from that
>>>> atheist holocaust make you feel personally.
>>>>
>>>>> numbnuts
>>>>
>>>> Well, without a heart, at least it's felt somewhere.
>>>>
>>>>> Budikka
>>
>> How easy it was to kick your arse out of the park, again!
>>
>> Just like old times:
>>

Bukakke ran, conceding the point

Bukakke ran, conceding the point

>> BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAAAA
>>
>> THAT IS WHAT YOU SAID ...about a child terrorised, tortured
>> and murdered by atheist thugs.. you heartless bitch.
>>
>>>> ... a 12 year old victim of the Atheist regime which
>>>> would go on to terrorise, torture and kill over 30,000,000 of
>>>> it's OWN PEOPLE!!!!
>>>>
>>>> There is nothing like it in history, and yet it happened in the
>>>> last 100 years.. the supposedly MODERN ERA!
>>>>
>>>> # When I demanded evidence for Bukakke's claim that 12 year old
>>>> # Alexi was a 'despot' who deserved be terrorised, tortured and
>>>> # killed by the atheist Red Terror .. Bukakke ran from the field
>>>> # and has never recanted his slander, BLAMING THE CHILD VICTIMS
>>>> # OF ATHEIST TERROR! 8^o
>>>>
>> > and I kicked your god-filled,
>>
>> I'm an agnostic, where is your evidence that this God you want
>> to blame, and falsely claim is the cause of your discomfit, EXISTS?
>>
>> Another desperate Bukkake LIE! B^D
>>

Bukakke ran, conceding the point

>> More FACT FREE SHITE from his
>>
>>> false-witness bearing ass,
>>
>>>> And here he is, STILL RUNNING (2 yrs, 8 mths, 27 days) and
>>>> EVADING the demand that he SHOW EVIDENCE for his vile
>>>> slander of Alexei and APOLOGISE, to his memory,
>>>> the victims of atheist tyranny, to Usenet and to me.
>>>>
>>>> Until he does, he remains a mangy Dog, not worth pissing on,
>>>> much less to be ever debated with again!
>>>>

Bukakke ran, conceding the point

>>>> Who would BOTHER, once DEFEATED, as he would be, he would
>>>> simply RUN AWAY, like the gutless lying coward he is!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> # I have his shield, (a hammer and sickle on a field of red blood,
>>>> # with a big Yellow stripe down it's back...;-) above my mantle piece
>>>> # as a trophy.
>>>>
>>>> http://www.humanisthall.net/Trophy3.jpg
>>
>>> and now here you are begging for my attention again!
>>
>> Another easily dismissed LIE:
>>
>> You posted in MY thread; B^D
>>
>> Message-ID:
>> <601513bc-abee-4588...@p13g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>
>>
>> You are such EASY MEAT, your lies are so clumsy and blatant.
>>

Bukakke ran, conceding the point

>>> You don't worship any god you worship me, you sad
>>> and lost little child.
>>
>> Bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahahaahahahahahahahaahaa
>>
>> A moment ago you claimed I was 'God-Filled' now you admit

>> what you should have paid attention to, when I told you I'm

>> an agnostic, and other, wiser, atheists told you it's true;
>>
>> # From: raven1 <quoththera...@nevermore.com>
>> # Newsgroups: alt.atheism,talk.atheism,alt.religion,
>> # alt.politics.republicans,alt.politics.democrats,
>> # uk.politics.misc,aus.politics,alt.politics.communism
>> # Subject: Re: The Decline of alt atheism - and time to say farewell to
>> the most trivial and useless branch of Nihilism! B^D
>> # Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 16:26:06 -0400
>> # Message-ID: <n4ofb51jvj209trfh...@4ax.com>
>> #
>> # > Dear old "fasgnadh" asserts his deity exists, but can't prove it.
>> #
>> # Fasgnadh has never asserted that a deity exists, and recently admitted
>> # to being agnostic. He's not here to push a deity, he's here to push
>> # peoples buttons.
>>
>>> I also kicked your ass on your endless lies about the Stalin regime
>>> and the Hitler regime and YOU RAN
>>
>> Really? cite my "endless lies about the Hitler regime"?

Bukakke ran, conceding the point

>> I don't use Nazism as an object lesson for atheists because it
>> wasn't an atheist state, you lying cretin!
>>

>> You are such EASY MEAT, your lies are so blatant, so desperate! B^]

Bukakke ran, conceding the point

>> In conversations with evidence as this post demonstrates,
>> *I* provide the only evidence for claims made,
>> atheists merely snip it and lie.
>>
>> Q.E.D
>>
>> Lets toy with the rest of this nonsense;
>>
>>> desperate for our attention
>>
>> You posted in my thread!
>>

Bukakke ran, conceding the point

>> '"Those that don't make mistakes, don't make anything"
>> - the story of atheism'
>>
>> How very apt! 8^)
>>
>> Thanks for playing, my predictable little puppet! B^]
>>
>> You make me look positively Psychic! B^D
>

> The way you imagine

It's insight, not imagination

> anyone can stand you

whereas no one can stand you atheist liars

> in the slightest?

Not according to surveys:


# Atheists Identified as America’s Most Distrusted Minority"
# - American Sociological Association, ASA NEWS
#
# "A survey by sociologists at the University of Minnesota
# found that atheists are “America’s most distrusted minority.”

It's not just blame for the totalitarian atheist regimes,
it's the way today's atheists defend those totalitarian
atheist cluster fucks.

# "From a telephone sampling of more than 2,000 households,
# university researchers found that Americans rate atheists
# below Muslims, recent immigrants, gays and lesbians and
# other minority groups in “sharing their vision of
# American society.”

http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:17475?context=latest

# Atheists are also the minority group most Americans are
# least willing to allow their children to marry.

You only have to see those violently murderous hate filled posts
from their Warlord and BAAWA thugs to see why people don't
want them in their families! 8^o

# Even though atheists are few in number, not formally
# organized and relatively hard to publicly identify,
# they are seen as a threat to the American way of life
# by a large portion of the American public.
#
# Many of the study’s respondents associated atheism with
# an array of moral indiscretions ranging from criminal
# behavior to rampant materialism and cultural elitism.

and we see their intellectual dishonesty and moral
defectiveness daily in alt.atheism where they lie
and slander those they can't debate.


# Edgell believes a fear of moral decline and resulting
# social disorder is behind the findings.
# “Americans believe they share more than rules and
# procedures with their fellow citizens—they share an
# understanding of right and wrong,” she said. “Our
# findings seem to rest on a view of atheists as
# self-interested individuals who are not concerned
# with the common good.”

>> Look Bukakke, don't be jealous that the Kooks chose me
>> for their ritual pantomime, they are even more desperate,
>> attention-seeking whores than you, and they only piggy back
>> on high flyers whose performances sell tickets, so they can
>> leverage their own sense of self-Importance.
>>
>> Are you really surprised that they, like everyone else,
>> don't care for your desperate monologues flogging the deceased
>> equine of Fundie Creationism because they are at your skill
>> level in the game?

Bukakke ran, conceding the point

Bukakke ran, conceding the point

>> Rant on forever, you have no effect, because you don't deal
>> with reality, you wrestle with your projected delusions.
>>
>> You simply can't win doing that.
>>
>>> I pity you, I really do.
>>
>> That's nice dear.
>>
>> If it calms you down and helps you feel better, that's fine.
>>
>> B^]
>>
>>> I pity you and feel sorry for you,
>>
>> It's like the calm after the raging storm of your bitter,
>> hate-filled angst, eh?
>>
>> But it's even less honest than all your other exposed lies,
>> which revealed that you are driven by hatred and rage, not pity.
>>
>>> but I have better things to do than waste my time
>>
>> Oh, is that why we see not a single fact actually refuted by you,
>> merely your claim that you did so somewhere, .. sometime unspecified!
>>
>> B^} You are a legend in your own mind, Bukakke
>>
>> Not a single point of mine rebutted with any quotes of me saying what
>> you falsely claim I said.. clear contradictions where you claim I am
>> a theis 'god-filled' and then that I don't worship God, I worship YOU!
>>
>> Can you HEAR yourself? B^D

Bukakke ran, conceding the point

After I chastised him, Bukakkke converted to Prophet Dawkin's
"First Atheist Church of the Evolving Deities" and built
an Altar of Atheism for them to sacrifice their minds to...

# From: Budikka666 <budi...@netscape.net>
# Newsgroups:

alt.atheism,talk.atheism,alt.talk.creationism,alt.religion,alt.religion.christian
# Subject: Disapproving Creation: Debunking Flatnads Juvenile Bullshit
Number Whatever
# Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 15:23:40 -0800 (PST)
# Message-ID:
<b5430732-e52e-45b5...@p13g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>
#
#
#> come worshiping at the altar of atheism,


No thanks, I would rather put my dick in
a blender than join your CULT! B^D

[fasgnadh]

Have you thought of trying remedial English classes?

BTW if you think Monty Python's Life Of Bwian is about Cock
then you probably are as stupid as your post indicates.

Run along, lightweight, back to the other Kook-Suckers

[fasgnadh]

On 5/02/2012 8:01 PM, Vurgil wrote:

> On 5/02/2012 7:10 PM, fasgnadh wrote:
>> On 31/01/2012 6:15 PM, felix_unger wrote:
>>> On 31-January-2012 12:58 AM, raven1 wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, 29 Jan 2012 00:45:54 -0500, Olrik<olri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> For years, "fasgnadh" has demonstrated its atheism, yet it's failed to
>>>>> publicly acknowledged it.
>>>>>
>>>>> The question is: is "fasgnadh" an atheist, or
>>
>> is each of the atheists who can't debate him, but instead
>> huddle together for mutual tool-fondling and to whine ABOUT him..
>>
>>>>> a mentally deficient degenerate?
>>
>> You be the judge, but USE the EVIDENCE,

> Like those that fasgnadh relies on so heavily.

>> not the unfounded OPINIONS,
>> baseless lies and slanders atheists rely on..
>>
>>
>>>>> Bear in mind that the question is not a false dichotomy.
>>
>> True, you can be atheist and a mentally deficient degenerate,
>> ... in fact it appears to be the norm.
>>
>>>> Whatever the case, he is an absolutely shameless liar. It's not even
>>>> worth responding to him, he'll just snip any rebuttal, and repeat the
>>>> same lies ad nauseam.
>>>
>>> The facts do not support that claim, quite the contrary
>>
>> Of course not, but that's how atheists 'mass-debate',
>> they don't engage in debate WITH you, they just form one of those
>> Maoist 'Re-Education' circles and all agree that they are right! B^D

>>

>> # "After two hours of conversation, Professor Dawkins walks far afield.
>> # He talks of the possibility that we might co-evolve with computers, a
>> # silicon destiny. And he¹s intrigued by the playful, even soul-stirring
>> # writings of Freeman Dyson, the theoretical physicist.
>> #
>> # 'In one essay, Professor Dyson casts millions of speculative years
>> # into the future. Our galaxy is dying and humans have evolved into
>> # something like bolts of superpowerful intelligent and moral energy.
>> #
>> # Doesn¹t that description sound an awful lot like God?
>> #
>> # "Certainly," Professor Dawkins replies. "It¹s highly plausible that
>> # in the universe there are God-like creatures."
>

> Note that "plausible" does not imply "actual".

Note that "THESE GODS CAME INTO BEING.." DOES: B^D

>> # He raises his hand, just in case a reader thinks he¹s gone around a
>> # religious bend. "It¹s very important to understand that these Gods
>> # came into being

BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHHAAHAHAHAHAAHAAA

>> # by an explicable scientific progression of

>> # incremental evolution."'
>> #
>> # Could they be immortal? The professor shrugs.
>> #
>> # ³Probably not.² He smiles and adds, ³But I
>> # wouldn¹t want to be too dogmatic about that.²"
>>
>>
>>
>> http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/20/science/20dawkins.html?pagewanted=all

--

Ex- Atheist, now Prophet, Richard Dawkins claims that some atheist
"Gods have come into being.." somewhere in the Universe "by an

explicable scientific progression of incremental evolution",
(which no atheist can explain). B^D

# "After two hours of conversation, Professor Dawkins walks far afield.
# He talks of the possibility that we might co-evolve with computers, a
# silicon destiny. And he’s intrigued by the playful, even soul-stirring
# writings of Freeman Dyson, the theoretical physicist.
#
# 'In one essay, Professor Dyson casts millions of speculative years
# into the future. Our galaxy is dying and humans have evolved into
# something like bolts of superpowerful intelligent and moral energy.
#
# Doesn’t that description sound an awful lot like God?
#
# "Certainly," Professor Dawkins replies. "It’s highly plausible that
# in the universe there are God-like creatures."
#
# He raises his hand,

http://www.vectorsite.net/taevo_07_01.jpg

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_5BV_YADVD7o/R3KMsQ0usrI/AAAAAAAABHU/qup-8dKPbEs/s400/pope+b16.jpg


# just in case a reader thinks he’s gone around a

# religious bend. "It’s very important to understand that these Gods
# came into being

When did that happen? where? How many 'came into being'?
Do they have names?

WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE?!??

# by an explicable scientific progression of incremental evolution."'


Explain how IMMATERIAL and SUPERNATURAL entities, "superpowerful
intelligent and moral energy" can be affected by Natural Selection,
which occurs in BIOLOGICAL species subject to physical mutations!?

[Colonel Jake]

<may BoB have mercy on fagnar's soul>

(fagnar),
"I definitely can see, that there was no denying it!!!..."
(YoU FuCKING-fagnar-CoCK-SuCKING-MaGGOT)

*I bet'cha, you'd even except faggalar as a new nym*

>
> Have you thought of just shooting me in the head?
>

Everytime!,
"I see you and your kind!!!..."

>
> BTW? Monty Python sucked Bwian's Cock so hard?
> he became as stupid as I, as my post indicates.
>

PReTTY-FuCKING!,
"Redundant there, 'as boi!!!.' .."

>
> Watch me skip along and fag-out, so I can go back
> to my Group and be a Real-Kook-Sucker!
>

How many KoOKS?,
"Do you nornally suck?!?!?! (per day)..."

*YoU KoOK-SuCKING-MaGGOT*

>
>

<from Teh BoOk of Colonel Jake'ster>

Colonel Jake 3:1 - "Thats for GoDDAMNED sure!!!..."
```````''' {°v°} '''´´´´´´´

[fasgnadh]

On 6/02/2012 3:51 PM, Fidem Turbare, atheist goddess wrote:

> [snip - more responses referencing "bukakke" metaphors]

WTF "metaphors" are you referring to,

"Bukkake may refer to:

A Japanese method of serving various types of
noodles, in particular udon"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bukkake

Run along Lightweight, you are way out of your depth! B^]

> You ride your high horse

Only when I'm up at the farm,
Do YOU have a farm, you jealous little slimer? B^]

> (porn-pun not intended)

You seem obsessed with porn.

Why don't you establish a healthy sexual relationship instead.

> regularly in your feeble attempts to discredit everyone,

Oh surely you don't think the tiny number of the atheist remnant and
a few Kook-Suckers xonstitutes 'everyone'

BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAAA

> and then you introduce filthy off-topic
> pornographic movie making practices into the conversation.

Say What!? 8^o

YOU just introduced that, NOT I, you lying atheist hypocrite.

What kind of porn have you been watching, you filthy deviant,
that has serving udon noodles in it?!?? 8^o

That was rhetorical, I don't want to hear any stories about your
porn collection or your blow-up boyfriend, Bland Lizard.

> This does not help your argument,

My argument needs no help, already it's targets run and hide from
me. B^]

You on the other hand, need help, professional psychiatric help
to free you from your porn fetish.

(If Findem Turdbar ever invites you to dinner,

DON'T eat the noodles! B^]


What do you think revealing your extensive knowledge of porn
will do to your reputation?

> it destroys any remaining shreds of credibility

Don't kid yourself, you had none.

Ex- Atheist, now Prophet, Richard Dawkins claims that some atheist

"Gods have come into being.." somewhere in the Universe "by an

explicable scientific progression of incremental evolution",
(which no atheist can explain). B^D

# "After two hours of conversation, Professor Dawkins walks far afield.
# He talks of the possibility that we might co-evolve with computers, a
# silicon destiny. And he’s intrigued by the playful, even soul-stirring
# writings of Freeman Dyson, the theoretical physicist.
#
# 'In one essay, Professor Dyson casts millions of speculative years
# into the future. Our galaxy is dying and humans have evolved into
# something like bolts of superpowerful intelligent and moral energy.
#
# Doesn’t that description sound an awful lot like God?
#
# "Certainly," Professor Dawkins replies. "It’s highly plausible that
# in the universe there are God-like creatures."
#
# He raises his hand,

http://www.vectorsite.net/taevo_07_01.jpg

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_5BV_YADVD7o/R3KMsQ0usrI/AAAAAAAABHU/qup-8dKPbEs/s400/pope+b16.jpg


# just in case a reader thinks he’s gone around a

# religious bend. "It’s very important to understand that these Gods
# came into being

When did that happen? where? How many 'came into being'?
Do they have names?

WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE?!??

# by an explicable scientific progression of incremental evolution."'


Explain how IMMATERIAL and SUPERNATURAL entities, "superpowerful
intelligent and moral energy" can be affected by Natural Selection,
which occurs in BIOLOGICAL species subject to physical mutations!?

[fasgnadh]

On 7/02/2012 1:01 AM, raven1 wrote:

> Perhaps you would have a different experience if you showed an
> interest in actual debate,

I did that when I first arrived in the sheltered workshop and
cesspit that is alt.atheism, but the pack-raping thugs that
did nothing but

> raving and throwing excrement

rncouraged me to teach them a lesson and ream them thoroughly.

Most satisfyingly, many of them woke up to themselves, and left.

The rest have naturally selected themselves for extended ritual humiliation.

It's evolution, stupid.. the survival of the FITTEST! B^]

[fasgnadh]

On 7/02/2012 3:16 AM, Don Martin wrote:

> Flatus made it into both my killfile and my Beneath
> Contempt list within a month of his first appearance,


I entered the stinking cesspit and sheltered workshop that is
alt.atheism circa Oct 2008 and asked some simple questions
which provoked the poor widdle atheists ro spittle foaming rage:

"Wht have all the great and enduring civilisations been inspired,
built and sustained by majority religious populations?"

and the corollary:

"Why is it that EVERY atheist state in history has been a totalitarian
tyranny and shithole, with not a SINGLE decent democracy, EVER!?"

The atheist response was, UNIVERSALLY, slander, abuse, an hom..
not a single rational argument, to this day.

# From: John Baker<nu...@bizniz.net>

# Subject: Re: Atheist recants: probability of God NOT nil! Final
# opinion SOON! B^D Re: Atheist claims
# the probability of God existing is nil - IMPOSSIBLE! B^D
# Re: What IS the 'probability' of God existing? How is it calculated?
# Re: London: 'Buses carry atheist message'
# Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 02:52:46 -0400
# Message-ID: <ikoag4tafckddbi6a...@4ax.com>
# X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
# X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your
# complaint properly
#
#
# On Mon, 27 Oct 2008 16:30:37 +1100, fasgnadh <fasg...@yahoo.com>
# wrote:
#
# > You really don't have much of a grasp of mathematical
# > probability, do you.
#
# Mathematical probability has nothing to do with it, halfwit.

From the outset, abu'Baker Bash'er, the Imam of Atheiston,
was a rude, abusive, anti-science bigot and knuckle-dragging thug!

#
# Fucking moron.
#
# shut the fuck up.
#
# End of story.


Naturally with such a pool of rabid ranters, I knew I could
keep pressing their buttons and watch them do St Vitus dance
for YEARS!

BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAAHAA

# From: raven1 <quoththera...@nevermore.com>
# Newsgroups: alt.atheism,talk.atheism,alt.religion,
# alt.politics.republicans,alt.politics.democrats,
# uk.politics.misc,aus.politics,alt.politics.communism
# Subject: Re: The Decline of alt atheism - and time to say farewell to
the most trivial and useless branch of Nihilism! B^D
# Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 16:26:06 -0400
# Message-ID: <n4ofb51jvj209trfh...@4ax.com>
#
# > Dear old "fasgnadh" asserts his deity exists, but can't prove it.
#
# Fasgnadh has never asserted that a deity exists, and recently admitted
# to being agnostic. He's not here to push a deity, he's here to push
# peoples buttons.

> I wonder how many atheists actually bother to read
> his output in the first place.

You will never know because you have assumed the orthodox atheist position;

http://waterfordwhispersnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Head-Up_Ass.png

..but it's most of them, my threads are always lively.

> If the reactions of other are like mine,

They are, here you are talking ABOUT me.

All the gutless atheist lightweights cave in,
unable to debate me they do what you are doing-
they whine like little bitches ABOUT me!

BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAAHAHAAAAAA



I set up random readership surveys, posts that deliberately
include small faux pas, and the atheists who pretend not to read me
can't help themselves and have to point out the 'error'. ;-)

But they never attack the substantive arguments.

They have all learned better.

> insulting him is to be expected.

from those that can't engage in, let alone win,
the substantive issues.


> (Calling insults "slander" falsely suggests that they are not based on the
> facts.)

But you claim to have kill-filed me.. so how could you possibly KNOW
the facts!?

BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAA


Run along lightweight...



Next atheist dimwit, please!

[Fidem Turbare, atheist goddess]

On Feb 7, 3:40 am, fasgnadh <fasgn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On 6/02/2012 3:51 PM, Fidem Turbare, atheist goddess wrote:
> > On 5/02/2012 7:58 PM, fasgnadh wrote:
> >> On 25/01/2012 4:11 AM, raven1 wrote:
> >>> On 25/01/2012 1:53 AM, fasgnadh wrote:
> >>>> Budikka666 snips REALITY and IMAGINES people love and adore him:
>
> >>>> "Flatnads Groupie Loves His Adored Atheists!"
>
> >>>> Can't Get Enough of Us!"
>
> >>>> Lets look at the facts Chicken Bukakke SNIPPED and RAN FROM
> >>>> before we demolish Bukakke's latest lies:
>
> >>>>> On 24/01/2012 8:52 PM, fasgnadh wrote:
> >>>>>> On 13/01/2012 11:29 AM, Budikka666 wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Jan 12, 5:49 am, Loirbaj<Rhodi...@wmconnect.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>> No, we don't hate you losers.
>
> >>>> It took milliseconds to demonstrate Bukakke's lie with
> >>>> the facts, this is the atheists chosen SpokesOrc, their
> >>>> Whorelord, (Bukakke is just a cut-price, 5th rate whore ;-);
>
> >>>>>> Yes you do:
>

> >>>>>> # From: Steve Knight <sknigh...@cox.net>

> >>>>>> # Newsgroups: alt.atheism
> >>>>>> # Subject: A.A. BAAWA - FAQ

> >>>>>> # Message-ID: <p8mrb5lvaf0cj5bp1e4jbmlsqebu9j9...@4ax.com>

> >>>>>> # Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 02:46:34 -0700
> >>>>>> #
> >>>>>> # We kill theists and shit down their throats
> >>>>>> #
> >>>>>> # Warlord Steve
> >>>>>> # BAAWA
>
> >>>> Fact Challenge for Bukakke, post a single atheist opposing
> >>>> your leaders psychopathic violence, and I will match it
> >>>> with TEN supporting him.
>
> >> Bukakke ran, conceding the point
>
> > [snip - more responses referencing "bukakke" metaphors]
>
> WTF "metaphors" are you referring to,
>
> "Bukkake may refer to:
>
>      A Japanese method of serving various types of
>      noodles, in particular udon"
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bukkake

A "method of serving noodles" can't "run." Your repeated use of the
phrase "Bukkake ran" indicates that you intentionally implied the
sexual meaning.

[snip - various ad hominems and references to pornography]

> What kind of porn have you been watching, you filthy deviant,
> that has serving udon noodles in it?!??   8^o

Ha ha. Wouldn't you like to know.

> That was rhetorical, I don't want to hear any stories about your
> porn collection or your blow-up boyfriend, Bland Lizard.

Nobody's getting blown up -- I don't know any suicide bombers. Your
use of ad hominem attacks doesn't help your position.

> > This does not help your argument,
>
> My argument needs no help, already it's targets run and hide from
> me.   B^]

Then why do have to keep defending your position?

> You on the other hand, need help, professional psychiatric help
> to free you from your porn fetish.

Appreciation of the human body in its natural state is not a fetish.

> (If Findem Turdbar ever invites you to dinner,
>
>              DON'T eat the noodles!  B^]

That statement is incoherent.

> What do you think revealing your extensive knowledge of porn
> will do to your reputation?

Your question is fallacious because it contradictorily relies on the
following facts:

1. I do not have an extensive knowledge of pornography
2. I do not have a reputation (at least not one that I'm aware of)

> >  it destroys any remaining shreds of credibility
>
> Don't kid yourself, you had none.

That was an observation about your lack of credibility. I never
claimed that I was credible.

> >>>>>>> we do hate and will fight to the death
>
> >>>>>> Unfortunately it's always your victims doing the dying;
> >>>>>> as was the case of the atheist states terror, torture and
> >>>>>> mass murder of over 60,000,000 OF THEIR OWN PEOPLE!
>
> >>>> Atheists can't refute the facts, in fact, the atheist source
> >>>> cited by Trance Gemini, your Whorelords personal whore, already admitted
> >>>> the horrific death toll from the atheist holocausts;
>
> >>>> # From: Kilmir <kil...@gmail.com>
> >>>> # Newsgroups: alt.agnosticism,alt.atheism,alt.religion.christian,
> >>>> # alt.usenet.kooks
> >>>> # Subject: Re: is religion really the answer? Not if the question is
> >>>> # "What killed 60,000,000 in the last 100 years"
> >>>> # - ATHEIST REGIMES DID IT! 8^o
> >>>> # Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 03:39:48 -0700 (PDT)
> >>>> # Message-ID:

> >>>> <042262dc-a546-4054-a893-c6e802a40...@b9g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>
> >>>> #
> >>>> #
> >>>>http://teapotatheism.blogspot.com/2008/06/anonymous-wanted-body-count...

> >>>>>> # Message-ID: <H7bPl.11167$y61.6...@news-server.bigpond.net.au>

> >>>>>>http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/russia/3115053/Russi...

> >>>> <601513bc-abee-4588-b243-264eaae6a...@p13g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>

>
> >>>> You are such EASY MEAT, your lies are so clumsy and blatant.
>
> >> Bukakke ran, conceding the point
>
> >>>>> You don't worship any god you worship me, you sad
> >>>>> and lost little child.
>
> >>>> Bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahahaahahahahahahahaahaa
>
> >>>> A moment ago you claimed I was 'God-Filled' now you admit
> >>>> what you should have paid attention to, when I told you I'm
> >>>> an agnostic, and other, wiser, atheists told you it's true;
>
> >>>> # From: raven1 <quoththera...@nevermore.com>
> >>>> # Newsgroups: alt.atheism,talk.atheism,alt.religion,
> >>>> # alt.politics.republicans,alt.politics.democrats,
> >>>> # uk.politics.misc,aus.politics,alt.politics.communism
> >>>> # Subject: Re: The Decline of alt atheism - and time to say farewell to
> >>>> the most trivial and useless branch of Nihilism! B^D
> >>>> # Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 16:26:06 -0400

> >>>> # Message-ID: <n4ofb51jvj209trfh044eoirl5cf0up...@4ax.com>

> >>>> # Message-ID: <hf1aj495t47br8nnh9hi5gjg3vh963g...@4ax.com>

> >>>> # From: Budikka666 <budik...@netscape.net>

> >>>> # Newsgroups:
> >>>> alt.atheism,alt.religion,alt.religion.christian,alt.agnosticism
> >>>> # Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 03:38:16 -0800 (PST)
> >>>> # Message-ID:

> >>>> <bfcf3a9d-9711-449a-b126-3a1c60146...@m3g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>

> >>>> #
> >>>> # You can keep your spiritual values.
> >>>> # I'll piss on them and pass on them.
> >>>> #
> >>>> # Budikka
>
> >>>>> Budikka
>
> >>>> When a simpleton abused him, Buddha listened to him in silence,
> >>>> but when the man had finished asked him,
> >>>> "Son, if a man declined to accept a present offered to him,
> >>>> to whom would it belong?"
> >>>> The man answered "To him who offered it."
> >>>> "My son," Buddha said, "I decline to accept your abuse. Keep it for
> >>>> yourself."
>
> >>>> - Will Durant The Story of Civilization.
>
> >> After I chastised him, Bukakkke converted to Prophet Dawkin's
> >> "First Atheist Church of the Evolving Deities" and built
> >> an Altar of Atheism for them to sacrifice their minds to...
>

> >> # From: Budikka666 <budik...@netscape.net>
> >> # Newsgroups:
> >> alt.atheism,talk.atheism,alt.talk.creationism,alt.religion,alt.religion.chr­istian

>
> >> # Subject: Disapproving Creation: Debunking Flatnads Juvenile Bullshit
> >> Number Whatever
> >> # Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 15:23:40 -0800 (PST)
> >> # Message-ID:

> >> <b5430732-e52e-45b5-abc3-7d0daa253...@p13g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>

> http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_5BV_YADVD7o/R3KMsQ0usrI/AAAAAAAABHU/qup-8dK...

>
> # just in case a reader thinks he’s gone around a
> # religious bend. "It’s very important to understand that these Gods
> # came into being
>
> When did that happen?  where?  How many 'came into being'?
> Do they have names?
>
>                   WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE?!??
>
> # by an explicable scientific progression of incremental evolution."'
>
> Explain how IMMATERIAL and SUPERNATURAL entities, "superpowerful
> intelligent and moral energy" can be affected by Natural Selection,
> which occurs in BIOLOGICAL species subject to physical mutations!?
>
> # Could they be immortal? The professor shrugs.
> #
> # “Probably not.” He smiles and adds, “But I
> # wouldn’t want to be too dogmatic about that.”"
>
> http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/20/science/20dawkins.html?pagewanted=all
>
> So, which atheist is going to explain the inexplicable,
> unscientific, BELIEF in "these {atheist] Gods", with no proof
> whatsoever, and show us the evidence of how, and where, God evolved?
>
> ...........................................................
>
> ...........................................................
>
> ...........................................................
>
> ---------
>
> alt.atheism FAQ:
>
> http://altatheismfaq.blogspot.com/
>

> http://groups.google.com.au/group/alt.atheism/msg/7c0978c14fd4ed37?hl...

>
>   "Atheism is the natural and inseparable part of Communism."
>       -Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)
>
>    "We must combat religion"
>        -Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)
>
>   “Down with religion and long live atheism;
>    the dissemination of atheist views is our chief task!”
>       - Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)
>
>   "Our program necessarily includes the propaganda of atheism."
>       - Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)
>
>    http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:8290?context=latest
>
>    http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:8295?context=latest
>
>    http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:6348?context=latest
>
>    http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:17478?context=latest
>
>   "How can you make a revolution without firing squads?"
>       - Lenin
>
>    http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:17475?context=latest
>
>    http://www.c96trading.com/Nagant_NKVD_300h.jpg
>

> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/telegraph/multimedia/archive/01001/Tsar-fa...

--
Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess
"My calculations show that even if God dedicated all of his time
meeting the dead, you would only get to meet him for half of one
second. There are 56 million deaths occurring annually and only 32
million seconds in a year."
-- Darwin Bedford, Ambassador of Reason ("The Pope is Humpty
Dumpty")

[Colonel Jake]

> "Do you normally suck?!?!?! (per day)..."

>
> *YoU KoOK-SuCKING-MaGGOT*
>
>>
>>
>
> <from Teh BoOk of Colonel Jake'ster>
> Colonel Jake 3:1 - "Thats for GoDDAMNED sure!!!..."
> ```````''' {°v°} '''´´´´´´´
>
>

<crickets>

It loOks like!,
"Fagnar weaseled his cowardliness-self out of this one!!!..."

[fasgnadh]

raven1 lied, as google's archive proves:

> On 7/02/2012 10:52 PM, fasgnadh wrote:

>> encouraged me to teach them a lesson and ream them thoroughly.

>>
>> Most satisfyingly, many of them woke up to themselves, and left.
>>
>> The rest have naturally selected themselves for extended ritual
>> humiliation.
>>
>> It's evolution, stupid.. the survival of the FITTEST! B^]
>

> Oh bullshit. You arrived spewing venom and ranting
> about Communist atrocities

Here's my first NINE posts to alt.atheism, none of them
even criticise atheists, they attack Bush and his Antipodean
lackey, John "RSlicker" Howard for the appointment of Archbishop
Hollingsworth(less) as Governor General! B^D

http://groups.google.com/groups/search?as_q=&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&num=10&scoring=&lr=&as_sitesearch=&as_qdr=&as_drrb=b&as_mind=1&as_minm=1&as_miny=1987&as_maxd=1&as_maxm=1&as_maxy=2007&as_ugroup=alt.atheism&as_usubject=&as_uauthors=fasgnadh&safe=off


None of those posts of mine are
"ranting about atrocities" in the atheist states.

You are exposed as a liar, you slandering atheist shitpig.
So what does that make YOU:

> a raving, hate-filled loon, and a serial liar to boot.


My next post, #10, to alt.atheism was about sex abuse in the
Catholic Church;

http://groups.google.com/groups/search?as_q=&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&num=10&scoring=&lr=&as_sitesearch=&as_qdr=&as_drrb=b&as_mind=1&as_minm=1&as_miny=2008&as_maxd=1&as_maxm=9&as_maxy=2008&as_ugroup=alt.atheism&as_usubject=&as_uauthors=fasgnadh&safe=off



> Good day sir.

Fuck off, you lying stack of shit.


What got the atheists SHRIEKING HYSTERICALLY, abusing,
lying and slandering, as ravin is doing, was when I asked
them a simple question about their Bus ads.. AND THEY
HAD NO ANSWER: B^D

Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 10:32:05 +1100
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
# From: fasgnadh <fasgn...@yahoo.com>
# Newsgroups: uk.politics.misc,soc.culture.irish,aus.politics,
# nz.politics, can.politics,alt.politics.immigration,
# alt.politics.usa.republican,aus.religion
# Subject: What IS the 'probability' of God existing?
# How is it calculated?

Simply ASKING that **QUESTION** is what provoked all the hysterical
athiest abuse, ad nome, slander, jackal pack attacks, and endless
whining for the next four years!!!!

8^o Howzzat for a WIND UP! ONE QUESTION! B^D

# Re: London: 'Buses carry atheist message'

# Message-ID: <4903ac73$0$31805$afc3...@news.optusnet.com.au>
# NNTP-Posting-Host: 122.108.22.141
#
# Michael Laudahn eOpposition wrote:
# > Buses in London could soon carry the slogan
# > "There's probably no God" as part of an atheist ad campaign.
#
# London buses, billboards and TV screens already carry atheist ads,
# Billions of dollars worth every year around the globe.
#
# They all propose worship of material goods, self, sex, money...
#
# "Money is our god" - The First International Bank of the Golden Calf
#
# It is foolish to think that atheists do not have other beliefs that
# substitute for religion, and one of them, apparently, is regarding
# the 'probability'(sic) of there being a God.
#
# Materialism is the most prevalent religion on the planet, it's high
# priests are the most highly paid, it's temples are the most
# extravagant,
# it's tithes and taxes the most crushing, extracting sales taxes from
# even the poorest among us, and it's wars the most devastating, over
# land, power, and now over oil and water.
#
# "Money not morality is the principal of a commercial
# nation" - Thomas Jefferson
#
# What is proposed with this ad is merely more didactic,
# more direct, more open, more explicit, and probably less effective
# than the more subtle seduction of advertising, which we know works.
#
# "There's probably no God" would make a wonderful, thought provoking
# piece of urban philosophy.. 'probably' implies the possibility of
# God existing and raises the question, how can you know the odds of
# God existing or not??

That simple question caused the Atheist Jihad against me which followed

# What numerical analysis, based on what theory, could possibly
# produce such a statement? What is the 'probability'...
#
# .. 51%? 60%? 85%? 99%?
# where are the facts supporting what seems to be a BELIEF
# dressed up to sound like it has some scientific merit.
#
# B^)
#
# > Comedy writer Ariane Sherine objected to Christian ads
# on London buses
#
# Why, given the multitude of ads for Mammon, for consumption,
# for greed,..would anyone object to a tiny number of
# religious ads, presumably presenting alternatives,
# such as Love, Compassion, Forgiveness, developing Spiritual
# qualities?
# Are there examples of what the ads said and why she found
# them offensive?? Does she have some kind of fascist
# objection to free speech?
#
# Could they be more offensive than, for example; 'Just do it!'
# what does that mean.. to a rapist on a subway train, for example?
#
# Did the 'religious' ads say "Just THINK about the consequences of your
# actions, for they are weighed and you are accountable for what you do"
#
# I dunno... you tell me which is more, or less, offensive.
#
#
# > which led to a website warning that people who reject
# > God are condemned to spend all eternity in "torment in hell".
#
# Wow, one whole website! B^D
#
# What strikes me is that those fanatics would have as much trouble
# giving precise meaning to 'hell' and 'eternity' as the other fanatics
# (as I believe Dawkins has become) have in explaining how they
# calculated the 'probability' of God. B^D
#
# > Backed by atheist campaigner Richard Dawkins,
# > she has inspired a response:
# > "Stop worrying and enjoy your life."
# >
#
# As simplistic as it is trite.
#
# Still, it's their money, they can send whatever message
# representing their belief system they like.. because
# we all have free speech... except, hang on, it ISN'T
# FREE!! you only get the public speech you can afford,
# because, unlike the air, the sun, the land we walk on
# and grow our food, the joy of love, family and community,
# the simple pleasure of gratitude and thankfullness, the
# awe and wonder at the Universe, and all those things which
# may, or may not, be gifts of a loving Creator.. the things
# of Man's world, from the God of Materialism he has created
# and worships, all cost.
#
# Now that is a probability we CAN calculate.
# You do PAY for the Golden Calf.
#
# So, as the Good Book taught the Atheists, who plagiarise
# without acknowledgment:
#
# "Stop worrying about the things of the world, the Global
# economic crisis, the mortgage, the yacht the Jones's have,
# the payment of private school fees, the maxed out credit
# cards, the hospital bills.. your job...
# (because WE ALL KNOW THESE MATERIAL CONCERNS WEIGH ON YOU
# FAR MORE HEAVILY THAN YOUR THOUGHTS OF HEAVEN OR HELL ;-)
# and enjoy life...."
#
# The original versions go something like this
#
# Luke 12
# "27": Consider the lilies how they grow: they toil not,
# they spin not; and yet I say unto you, that Solomon
# in all his glory was not arrayed like one of these.
#
# Relax, kick back, this planet is a paradise, stop
# scrambling about for plastic shit, gegaws and gimcracks,
# because after all that striving for material wealth,
# you seek the beach or the mountain or the river.. ;-)
#
# "28": If then God so clothe the grass, which is to
# day in the field, and to morrow is cast into the oven;
# how much more will he clothe you, O ye of little faith?
#
# Pluck a blade of grass, look closely, "cans't thou find fault
# with creation?" and yet it is TRANSIENT.. just like you! ;-)
#
# Death is simply part of a process, we know our 'star-dust' the
# atoms and molecules making us up, flows on though soil and plant
# and animal, air and sky.. so we PHYSICALLY are one with the
# universe, we do 'go on'.
# Some, believe that the spirit, which is not made of matter,
# and therefore does not decay, like the body, also 'goes on'.
#
# Some may take a crude 'afterlife' understanding of this, like the
# Egyptians, the Chinese Emperors, or the Hellfire Christians,
# others simply say, we know no more about spiritual realms than
# we knew about this world when we lived as embryos. ;-)
#
# "29": And seek not ye what ye shall eat, or what ye
# shall drink, neither be ye of doubtful mind.
#
# Don't worry ( neither about Material concerns, nor death, nor
# the possibility or nature of existing beyond death)
#
# "30": For all these things do the nations of the world
# seek after: and your Father knoweth that ye have
# need of these things.
#
# Your material needs are taken care of, provisioned by the planet,
# all you need do is organise to produce and share what each needs.
#
# Of course, if you choose to allocate on the basis of ownership,
# greed and great disparities of wealth and poverty, don't blame
# God.
#
# "31": But rather seek ye the kingdom of God; and all
# these things shall be added unto you.
#
# If you focus on Spiritual values, (think about how your family
# operates on love, kindness, justice, equity, fairness,
# compassion..) ..and extend these into the community,
# nation and world, then the material concerns will all be resolved.
#
# "32": Fear not, little flock; for it is your Father's good
# pleasure to give you the kingdom.
#
# The air and water are pure and exactly what we need, the planet
# is perfectly located, any closer to Sol and we burn up,
# any further away we freeze, the magnetic field and atmosphere
# protect us from cosmic and solar radiation.. we have everything
# we need, including Spiritual guidance on how to make it all work.
#
# "33": Sell that ye have, and give alms; provide yourselves
# bags which wax not old, a treasure in the heavens that
# faileth not, where no thief approacheth, neither moth corrupteth.
#
# Ask a parent what they would save, their Bank deposits or their
# child.
#
# That is the difference between the 'Kingdom of Heaven' and Mammon.
#
#
# "34": For where your treasure is, there will your heart be also.
#
#
# It is not money which is evil, it is just a tool,
# but the Love of money is a sickness, an aberration,
# an Idol, worshipped by millions.
#
# This original "stop Worrying and enjoy life" actually
# goes further, and advises 'do not be afraid EVEN OF DEATH'
#
# Luke (12:4)
# "And I say unto you my friends, Be not afraid
# of them that kill the body,
# and after that have no more that they can do."
#
# Compared to Dawkin's message, I think the God botherers have
# won the 'stay calm' battle. B^)
#
# I know there are some Christians, and some from other faiths,
# that, out of their own fears, fashion a God of terror, but
# I don't meet many like that, do you?
#
# My Gran, aunties, all old-fashioned Christians, they have
# rejected the 'Hell-Fire and Brimstone" Christianity that
# some have taught, and Atheists find it easy to parody.. but it
# is a measure of of the intellectual frailty of Dawkin's
# crude religious stereotypes that he looks ONLY at those views.
#
# Hasn't he read, there are none so blind as those who will not see?
#
# That's not referring to his belief in or denial of God, I would never
# disrespect any persons fundamental right to CHOOSE in matters of faith
# or no faith.. it is a commentary on his selective treatment of the
# faith decisions of others .. I enjoy his Iconoclasm, his destruction
# of Shibboleths, and his evisceration of primitive superstition,
# but it is not a fair or comprehensive treatment of matters of Faith
# and belief.
#
# And his vitriol does not make his case stronger
#
# He never touches on the Quakers.. or the Sufis, or the development
# of hospitals by Islam, he never talks about the St Vinnies or
# the soup kitchens, he never talks about the Ladies Auxiliary
# with their cake stalls for African orphans...
# He never talks about the woman who visits the sick in hospital,
# not to make converts, but to lend a word of comfort..
# Do atheists visit hospitals with a word of comfort for the dying,
# or would they just blithely say "Stop worrying and enjoy life"
# ... if they said that to my dying Gran I would kick their arse!
# Gran knows that life is NOT JUST about enjoyment, and there is more
# to it than mere Material existence.
#
#
# >
# > http://www.teletext.co.uk/news/national
/9449eb9ea1aa107853130759d0992e44/Buses+carry+atheist+message.aspx

[fasgnadh]

Findem Turdbar, atheist slimebag still wallowing in porn:
> ravin1<quoththera...@nevermore.com> posts his resume:
>>
>> raving and throwing excrement.
>
> He also throws bukakke.
>
> --
> Fidem Turbare,

You are still obsessed with pornography, you filthy atheist slimebag!

On 6/02/2012 3:51 PM, Fidem Turbare, atheist goddess wrote:
> On 5/02/2012 7:58 PM, fasgnadh wrote:
>> On 25/01/2012 4:11 AM, raven1 wrote:
>>> On 25/01/2012 1:53 AM, fasgnadh wrote:
>>>> Budikka666 snips REALITY and IMAGINES people love and adore him:
>>>>
>>>> "Flatnads Groupie Loves His Adored Atheists!"
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Can't Get Enough of Us!"
>>>>
>>>> Lets look at the facts Chicken Bukakke SNIPPED and RAN FROM
>>>> before we demolish Bukakke's latest lies:
>>>>

>>>>> On 24/01/2012 8:52 PM, fasgnadh wrote:
>>>>>> On 13/01/2012 11:29 AM, Budikka666 wrote:
>>>>>>> On Jan 12, 5:49 am, Loirbaj<Rhodi...@wmconnect.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No, we don't hate you losers.
>>>>

>>>> It took milliseconds to demonstrate Bukakke's lie with
>>>> the facts, this is the atheists chosen SpokesOrc, their
>>>> Whorelord, (Bukakke is just a cut-price, 5th rate whore ;-);
>>>>

>>>>>> Yes you do:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> # From: Steve Knight <skni...@cox.net>
>>>>>> # Newsgroups: alt.atheism
>>>>>> # Subject: A.A. BAAWA - FAQ
>>>>>> # Message-ID: <p8mrb5lvaf0cj5bp1...@4ax.com>
>>>>>> # Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 02:46:34 -0700
>>>>>> #
>>>>>> # We kill theists and shit down their throats
>>>>>> #
>>>>>> # Warlord Steve
>>>>>> # BAAWA
>>>>

>>>> Fact Challenge for Bukakke, post a single atheist opposing
>>>> your leaders psychopathic violence, and I will match it
>>>> with TEN supporting him.
>>
>> Bukakke ran, conceding the point
>
> [snip - more responses referencing "bukakke" metaphors]

WTF "metaphors" are you referring to,

"Bukkake may refer to:

A Japanese method of serving various types of
noodles, in particular udon"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bukkake

Run along Lightweight, you are way out of your depth! B^]

> You ride your high horse

Only when I'm up at the farm,
Do YOU have a farm, you jealous little slimer? B^]

> (porn-pun not intended)

You seem obsessed with porn.

Why don't you establish a healthy sexual relationship instead.

> regularly in your feeble attempts to discredit everyone,

Oh surely you don't think the tiny number of the atheist remnant and
a few Kook-Suckers xonstitutes 'everyone'

BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAAA

> and then you introduce filthy off-topic
> pornographic movie making practices into the conversation.

Say What!? 8^o

YOU just introduced that, NOT I, you lying atheist hypocrite.

What kind of porn have you been watching, you filthy deviant,
that has serving udon noodles in it?!?? 8^o

That was rhetorical, I don't want to hear any stories about your
porn collection or your blow-up boyfriend, Bland Lizard.

> This does not help your argument,

My argument needs no help, already it's targets run and hide from
me. B^]

You on the other hand, need help, professional psychiatric help
to free you from your porn fetish.

(If Findem Turdbar ever invites you to dinner,

DON'T eat the noodles! B^]

What do you think revealing your extensive knowledge of porn
will do to your reputation?

> it destroys any remaining shreds of credibility

Don't kid yourself, you had none.

[fasgnadh]

On 9/02/2012 10:56 AM, John Baker wrote:
> On 6/02/2012 3:51 PM, Fidem Turbare, atheist goddess wrote:
>> On 5/02/2012 7:58 PM, fasgnadh wrote:

> He never had any credibility to begin with,
> let alone remaining shreds.


Neither did you, you little Drama Queen in a frilly frock;

# From: John Baker <nu...@bizniz.net>
# Newsgroups: alt.atheism
# Subject: Another One Bites The Dust
# Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2008 05:07:33 -0500
# Message-ID: <hf1aj495t47br8nnh...@4ax.com>
#
# Just wanted to say farewell to everyone.
# I've been giving it quite a
# lot of thought lately, and I've
# decided it's time for me to move on.
#
# I've finally reached the end of my rope.
#
# I've simply had all I can stand
@
# I just can't handle it anymore.
#
# I don't see myself continuing

# I'm going to end up going postal.

Let me help you with that:

"Try and think outside the Envelope!" BWAAAAAAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAAAAA

http://www.google.com.au/search?tbm=isch&hl=en&source=hp&biw=1280&bih=881&q=stamps&gbv=2&oq=stamps&aq=f&aqi=g10&aql=&gs_sm=12&gs_upl=1849l2895l0l4818l6l6l0l0l0l0l272l752l3.2.1l6l0


--

Ex- Atheist, now Prophet, Richard Dawkins claims that some atheist

"Gods have come into being.." somewhere in the Universe "by an

explicable scientific progression of incremental evolution",
(which no atheist can explain). B^D

# "After two hours of conversation, Professor Dawkins walks far afield.
# He talks of the possibility that we might co-evolve with computers, a
# silicon destiny. And he’s intrigued by the playful, even soul-stirring
# writings of Freeman Dyson, the theoretical physicist.
#
# 'In one essay, Professor Dyson casts millions of speculative years
# into the future. Our galaxy is dying and humans have evolved into
# something like bolts of superpowerful intelligent and moral energy.
#
# Doesn’t that description sound an awful lot like God?
#
# "Certainly," Professor Dawkins replies. "It’s highly plausible that
# in the universe there are God-like creatures."
#
# He raises his hand,

http://www.vectorsite.net/taevo_07_01.jpg

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_5BV_YADVD7o/R3KMsQ0usrI/AAAAAAAABHU/qup-8dKPbEs/s400/pope+b16.jpg


# just in case a reader thinks he’s gone around a

# religious bend. "It’s very important to understand that these Gods
# came into being

When did that happen? where? How many 'came into being'?
Do they have names?

WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE?!??

# by an explicable scientific progression of incremental evolution."'


Explain how IMMATERIAL and SUPERNATURAL entities, "superpowerful
intelligent and moral energy" can be affected by Natural Selection,
which occurs in BIOLOGICAL species subject to physical mutations!?

[Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess]

On 2012-Feb-09 00:58, fasgnadh wrote:
> Findem Turdbar, atheist slimebag still wallowing in porn:
>> ravin1<quoththera...@nevermore.com> posts his resume:
>>>
>>> raving and throwing excrement.
>>
>> He also throws bukakke.
>>
>> --
>> Fidem Turbare,
>
> You are still obsessed with pornography, you filthy atheist slimebag!

I was being humourous, but it's clear that your sense of humour is much
greater than my own.

--
Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess

"Darwin works in mysterious ways (and that applies to everyone)."
-- Patrick L. "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey

[fasgnadh]

Fidem Turbare confirms Ravin is a lying atheist shitpig slanderer :

> On Feb 9, 12:49 am, fasgnadh<fasgn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> raven1 lied, as google's archive proves:> On 7/02/2012 10:52 PM, fasgnadh wrote:
>>>> On 7/02/2012 1:01 AM, raven1 wrote:
>>>>> On 5/02/2012 10:28 PM, fasgnadh wrote:
>>>>>> On 5/02/2012 8:01 PM, Vurgil wrote:
>>>>>>> On 5/02/2012 7:10 PM, fasgnadh wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 31/01/2012 6:15 PM, felix_unger wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 31-January-2012 12:58 AM, raven1 wrote:

> So why are you posting this stuff,

To prove that Ravin is a lying atheist Kook-Sucker.

As you have conceded that Ravin is a LYING ATHEIST Kook-Sucker,
your sole purpose in life is fulfilled.

...

>> You are exposed as a liar, you slandering atheist shitpig.
>

> Your ad hominem attacks

What ad hom? I have just demonstrated the evidence which shows
that Ravin is a lying atheist shitpig slanderer.

You have accepted it.

Your whining in defence of the gutless shitpig simply shows
that like attracts like.

>> So what does that make YOU:
>>
>>> a raving, hate-filled loon, and a serial liar to boot.
>>
>> My next post, #10, to alt.atheism was about sex abuse in the
>> Catholic Church;

A bit hard for the atheist propagandist TOOLS to show anything
ANTI-ATHEIST in that!

BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAA


>>
http://groups.google.com/groups/search?as_q=&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&num=10&scoring=&lr=&as_sitesearch=&as_qdr=&as_drrb=b&as_mind=1&as_minm=1&as_miny=2008&as_maxd=1&as_maxm=9&as_maxy=2008&as_ugroup=alt.atheism&as_usubject=&as_uauthors=fasgnadh&safe=off

For those brain dead atheist fuckwits such as turdball who
can't clink on a hyperlink and read what is in front of them,

This was part of a series of posts I made criticising
the Church's cover-up of paedophile priests;

# "Hear Hear!
#
# The Age eidtorial, the day before, echoing the views
# of many of us that an apology is hollow words without
# firm action to accept responsibility for the cover-up:
#
# ....
#
# "The Pope certainly should apologise but, as The
# Age noted last week, any apology now will have
# a hollow ring. That was evident after Cardinal
# Pell's difficulties, but is even more so now
# after Bishop Fisher's comments. Pope Benedict
# will, no doubt, be personally sincere in any
# apology he might make. But the measure of an
# apology's worth is the change that ensues from it,
# and when people like Bishop Fisher continue to
# speak dismissively about abuse victims and their
# families, there seems scant prospect that the church's
# handling of the sexual-abuse crisis is changing for
# the better."
# - Editorial, The Age July 18, 2008

And that's what that lying atheist shitpig slanderer, ravin,
and hios pet monkey, turdball, are trying to present as my
FEROCIOUS ATTACK UPON ATHEISM!

BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAAAA

> Those are search results. Why not post a direct link to the specific
> article you're trying to use in your argument?

BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAA

It is, you mewling infant!

Now that you have made a complete fool of yourself in public,
answer this.. why are you defending the PATENT LIES of that
atheist slanderer?

> Perhaps because it
> doesn't exist and you cleverly pre-planned a cop-out of "gee, the
> search results must've changed unexpectedly, I guess you'll have to
> just take my word for it."


The search results work fine..

you don't.


B^]

>>> Good day sir.
>>
>> Fuck off, you lying stack of shit.
>

> [snip]

ok.

>>
>> What got the atheists SHRIEKING HYSTERICALLY, abusing,
>> lying and slandering, as ravin is doing, was when I asked
>> them a simple question about their Bus ads.. AND THEY
>> HAD NO ANSWER: B^D
>>
>> Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 10:32:05 +1100
>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> # From: fasgnadh <fasgn...@yahoo.com>
>> # Newsgroups: uk.politics.misc,soc.culture.irish,aus.politics,
>> # nz.politics, can.politics,alt.politics.immigration,
>> # alt.politics.usa.republican,aus.religion
>> # Subject: What IS the 'probability' of God existing?
>> # How is it calculated?
>>
>> Simply ASKING that **QUESTION** is what provoked all the hysterical

>> athiest abuse, ad hom, slander, jackal pack attacks, and endless

>> whining for the next four years!!!!
>

> You're the one who chose to continue participating in alt.atheism.


Yes, I enjoy exposing their lies, watching them run to ground,
and feeble dung beetles like yourself trying desperately to
land a punch!

BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAAHAHAAA


You see, everytime I demonstrate that atheists HAVE NO ANSWERS
to rational, well thought out questions, that they resort to LIES
because they have no argument, they squeal like stuck pigs,
and that energy powers the lighting in my home. B^D

> Your statement doesn't make any sense

Only to a pig ignorant fuckwit such as yourself.

> because a "Jihad" is specific

Yes, it specifically means 'Struggle' in Arabic.

Don't you know the word 'S-t-r-u-g-g-l-e' in English?

IS that because you are a fucking QUARTER WIT, uneducated,
ignorant and a danger to yourself and others with anything sharper
than a golf ball.

> to the Muslim faith

What on earth makes you think that struggle is unique to Islam?

The concept, is universal.


> -- it's not something that atheists engage in.

BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAA

You struggle even to KEEP UP! B^D

You are a simply a fool, too stupid, even, to know when
to shut up, rather than reveal your foolishness.

Please keep coming back for more, a real leather punching bag
is worth so much more than you!

The Arabic, like the English term, for struggle, has a variety
of contexts,

the most common in all spiritual texts, Jewish, Christian, Muslim..
is 'struggle against self' that is the process of overcoming,
of self-transformation.. of course it also refers to the 'struggle'
in a broader socio-political sense for Justice, and thus for example,
the 'struggle' to overthrow Nazism, or the atheist tyrannies of the 20th
Century.

But in the Qur'an as in every spiritual teaching, the greatest
enemy to be over come, is Self. That is the primary meaning of Jihad.



You and the other infants really should vacate your fantasy worlds
and get an education.. it's just embarrassing how thicker-than-pigshit
you appear to people who actually read books.

>> # What numerical analysis, based on what theory, could possibly
>> # produce such a statement? What is the 'probability'...
>> #
>> # .. 51%? 60%? 85%? 99%?

Notice that these banjo-pluckin boys from Deliverance run
from the subject as if the Devil was after them!

They don't like IDEAS and they can't work them NUMBER thingy's!


BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAAHAA

>> # and enjoy life...."
>> #
>> # The original versions go something like this
>> #
>> # Luke 12
>> # "27": Consider the lilies how they grow: they toil not,
>> # they spin not; and yet I say unto you, that Solomon
>> # in all his glory was not arrayed like one of these.
>> #
>> # Relax, kick back, this planet is a paradise, stop
>> # scrambling about for plastic shit, gegaws and gimcracks,
>> # because after all that striving for material wealth,
>> # you seek the beach or the mountain or the river..

>> #
>> # "28": If then God so clothe the grass, which is to
>> # day in the field, and to morrow is cast into the oven;
>> # how much more will he clothe you, O ye of little faith?
>> #
>> # Pluck a blade of grass, look closely, "cans't thou find fault
>> # with creation?" and yet it is TRANSIENT.. just like you!

>> #
>> # Death is simply part of a process, we know our 'star-dust' the
>> # atoms and molecules making us up, flows on though soil and plant
>> # and animal, air and sky.. so we PHYSICALLY are one with the
>> # universe, we do 'go on'.
>> # Some, believe that the spirit, which is not made of matter,
>> # and therefore does not decay, like the body, also 'goes on'.
>> #
>> # Some may take a crude 'afterlife' understanding of this, like the
>> # Egyptians, the Chinese Emperors, or the Hellfire Christians,
>> # others simply say, we know no more about spiritual realms than
>> # we knew about this world when we lived as embryos.

> Fidem Turbare, the non-existent atheist goddess

That doesn't make sense.

[fasgnadh]

Fidem Turbare, reveals his misogynist objectification of women:

> On 9/02/2012 7:58 PM, fasgnadh wrote:
>> Findem Turdbar, atheist slimebag still wallowing in porn:
>>> ravin1<quoththera...@nevermore.com> posts his resume:
>>>>
>>>> raving and throwing excrement.
>>>
>>> He also throws bukakke.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Fidem Turbare,
>>
>> You are still obsessed with pornography, you filthy atheist slimebag!
>>

Can you imagine it! Febrile Turdball introduces HIS
filthy deviant's dirty-minded, porn-obsessed references into
my innocent post comparing Budikkka to a damp, limp NOODLE,
revealing that he is a connoisseur of the ritual humiliation
of women! B^[

[don't you HAVE a mother, you filthy, disgusting little misogynist
atheist slimeball!?!!)

No wonder none of you have girlfriends..

>> What kind of porn have you been watching, you filthy deviant,
>> that has serving udon noodles in it?!?? 8^o
>

> I was being humourous,

No *I* was being humourous, Udon noodle is a harmless and innocent
witticism and spoof of that tedious Acolyte of the Spaghetti Monster,
Bukakke... but YOU think that YOUR reference to YOUR deep
knowledge of the ritual humiliation of women is FUNNY! 8^o

IT ISN'T!


B^[

You didn't tell a joke, you ARE the JOKE!

BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAAHAHAAA

> it's clear that your sense of humour is much
> greater than my own.

Sure, I have the more RIDICULOUS opponent to LAUGH AT!

BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAAHA

[Earle Jones]

In article <%ULYq.2843$v14...@viwinnwfe02.internal.bigpond.com>,

fasgnadh <fasg...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Findem Turdbar, atheist slimebag still wallowing in porn:
> > ravin1<quoththera...@nevermore.com> posts his resume:
> >>
> >> raving and throwing excrement.
> >
> > He also throws bukakke.
> >
> > --
> > Fidem Turbare,
>
> You are still obsessed with pornography, you filthy atheist slimebag

*
"Judge not, lest ye be judged."

--God
*

[fasgnadh]

bit r ⦿t The Cake Boi fantasist wrote "Turdball rides fagsnardz's rump":

Why do you cake bois all fantasise about sodomy

Why do all these atheist Kook Suckers have a fetish for shit?

Apart from the fact that they have an endless supply from their posts!

B^]

>>>> >>>> Fact Challenge for Bukakke, post a single atheist opposing
>>>> >>>> your leaders psychopathic violence, and I will match it
>>>> >>>> with TEN supporting him.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bukakke ran, conceding the point
>>>>>
>>>>> [snip - more responses referencing "bukakke" metaphors]
>>>>

That was cute, the atheist porn addict snips the criticisms
of the psychotic atheist ranters, using the excuse of his own FILTHY
IMAGINATION!

BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAAHAA

>>>> WTF "metaphors" are you referring to,
>>>>
>>>> "Bukkake may refer to:
>>>>
>>>> A Japanese method of serving various types of
>>>> noodles, in particular udon"
>>>>
>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bukkake
>>>>
>>>> Run along Lightweight, you are way out of your depth! B^]
>>>>
>>>>> You ride your high horse
>>>>
>>>> Only when I'm up at the farm,
>>>> Do YOU have a farm, you jealous little slimer? B^]
>>>>
>>>>> (porn-pun not intended)
>>>>
>>>> You seem obsessed with porn.
>>>>

>>>> Why don't you establish a healthy sexual relationship instead?
>>>>

Why don't you have girlfriends, instead of titillating yourself
with porn?

>>>>> regularly in your feeble attempts to discredit everyone,
>>>>
>>>> Oh surely you don't think the tiny number of the atheist remnant and
>>>> a few Kook-Suckers xonstitutes 'everyone'
>>>>
>>>> BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAAA
>>>>

It's incredible how serious these infantile newbies take themselves!

The Kook Suckers have a whole NG dedicated to the baseless opinions
of a dozen wankers!

B^D

It's as if they all need mutual ego-stroking to get by.

Priceless! B^]

>>>>> and then you introduce filthy off-topic
>>>>> pornographic movie making practices into the conversation.
>>>>
>>>> Say What!? 8^o
>>>>
>>>> YOU just introduced that, NOT I, you lying atheist hypocrite.
>>
>> Can you imagine it! Febrile Turdball introduces HIS
>> filthy deviant's dirty-minded, porn-obsessed references into
>> my innocent post comparing Budikkka to a damp, limp NOODLE,
>> revealing that he is a connoisseur of the ritual humiliation
>> of women! B^[
>>
>> [don't you HAVE a mother, you filthy, disgusting little misogynist
>> atheist slimeball!?!!)
>>
>> No wonder none of you have girlfriends..
>>
>>
>>>> What kind of porn have you been watching, you filthy deviant,
>>>> that has serving udon noodles in it?!?? 8^o
>>>
>>> I was being humourous,
>>
>> No *I* was being humourous, Udon noodle is a harmless and innocent
>> witticism and spoof of that tedious Acolyte of the Spaghetti Monster,
>> Bukakke... but YOU think that YOUR reference to YOUR deep
>> knowledge of the ritual humiliation of women is FUNNY! 8^o
>>
>> IT ISN'T!
>>
>>
>> B^[
>>
>> You didn't tell a joke, you ARE the JOKE!
>>
>> BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAAHAHAAA
>>

Never mind, Bittr Bum Boi will protect you!


BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAA

>>> it's clear that your sense of humour is much
>>> greater than my own.
>>
>> Sure, I have the more RIDICULOUS opponent to LAUGH AT!
>>
>> BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAAHA
>>
>>
>>>> That was rhetorical, I don't want to hear any stories about your
>>>> porn collection or your blow-up boyfriend, Bland Lizard.
>>>>
>>>>> This does not help your argument,
>>>>
>>>> My argument needs no help, already it's targets run and
>>>> hide from me. B^]
>>>>
>>>> You on the other hand, need help, professional psychiatric help
>>>> to free you from your porn fetish.

Take your Bittr Bum Boy with you for a consult, he snips all
the context and saves only the material he needs for mass-debating;

# slimebag still wallowing in porn
# raving and throwing excrement.
# He also throws bukakke.
# you filthy atheist slimebag!
# Flatnads Groupie Loves His Adored Atheists!
# You seem obsessed with porn.
# Why don't you establish a healthy sexual relationship
# comparing Budikkka to a damp, limp NOODLE,
# [don't you HAVE a mother, you filthy, disgusting little misogynist
# No wonder none of you have girlfriends..
# your blow-up boyfriend, Bland Lizard.

>>>> (If Findem Turdbar ever invites you to dinner,
>>>>
>>>> DON'T eat the noodles! B^]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> What do you think revealing your extensive knowledge of porn
>>>> will do to your reputation?
>>>>
>>>>> it destroys any remaining shreds of credibility
>>>>
>>>> Don't kid yourself, you had none.
>

> GO FAGSNARDS GO!!!!

Thanks, but I don't want you as an acolyte,

I'm straight and have no interest in your obsessional
fantasies, you weird little fudge packer.

[fasgnadh]

On 10/02/2012 4:56 AM, Earle Jones wrote:

> On 9/02/2012 7:58 PM, fasgnadh wrote:
>> Findem Turdbar, atheist slimebag still wallowing in porn:
>>> ravin1<quoththera...@nevermore.com> posts his resume:
>>>>
>>>> raving and throwing excrement.
>>>
>>> He also throws bukakke.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Fidem Turbare,
>>

> *
> "Judge not, lest ye be judged."
>
> --God
> *

Fascinating, first Pope Dawkins finds religion,
"These Gods came into being" ...then Bukakke builds
an Atheist Altar to worship those Gods;

# From: Budikka666 <budi...@netscape.net>

# Newsgroups: alt.atheism,talk.atheism,alt.talk.creationism,
alt.religion,alt.religion.christian
# Subject: Disapproving Creation:

# Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 15:23:40 -0800 (PST)
# Message-ID:

<b5430732-e52e-45b5...@p13g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>

#
#
#> come worshiping at the altar of atheism,

..and the atheists officially applied to register AS A RELIGION:

# It's Official, Atheists claim to be a persecuted RELIGION: B^D
#
#
# "THE Atheist Foundation of Australia has lodged complaints
# of religious discrimination in Melbourne and Hobart
#
# "atheism counts as a religion, Dr Perkins said."
# The Age 29/1/2009

and now, when I simply show the porn obsessed atheist deviants
and psycho-sexual sociopaths are liars

..they quote SCRIPTURE at me! I'm an AGNOSTIC! B^D

BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAA

Priceless! B^D

Oh BTW, I haven't judged anyone, I have no desire, (nor delusions
of Kook Grandeur), driving me to run bitchy little jackal-pack
witch hunts.. ...neither they nor I have any POWER to judge
others... I merely run my commentaries on their OBSERVED
behaviour...

that alone seems to send them all into a conniption,
as Ravin once observed;

# From: raven1 <quoththera...@nevermore.com>
# Newsgroups: alt.atheism,talk.atheism,alt.religion,
# alt.politics.republicans,alt.politics.democrats,
# uk.politics.misc,aus.politics,alt.politics.communism
# Subject: Re: The Decline of alt atheism - and time to say farewell to
the most trivial and useless branch of Nihilism! B^D
# Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 16:26:06 -0400

# Message-ID: <n4ofb51jvj209trfh...@4ax.com>
#

#
# Fasgnadh has never asserted that a deity exists, and recently admitted
# to being agnostic. He's not here to push a deity, he's here to push
# peoples buttons.

B^] The atheist Kook-suckers are such EASY MEAT! B^D

[fasgnadh]

raven1 snips the evidence that he's a lying atheist slanderer and runs:

<unsnip>

>>>>>>>> # Our galaxy is dying and humans have evolved into

>>>>>>>> # something like bolts of superpowerful intelligent

>>>>>>>> # and moral energy.

>>>>>>>> #
>>>>>>>> # Doesn¹t that description sound an awful lot like God?
>>>>>>>> #
>>>>>>>> # "Certainly," Professor Dawkins replies.

>>>>>>>> # "It¹s highly plausible that

>>>>>>>> # in the universe there are God-like creatures."
>>>>>>>> #

>>>>>>>> # He raises his hand, just in case a reader thinks

>>>>>>>> # he¹s gone around a religious bend.
>>>>>>>> # "It¹s very important to understand that these Gods

>>>>>>>> # came into being
>>>>>>
>>>>>> BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHHAAHAHAHAHAAHAAA
>>>>>>

> Yawn.

Yes your lies are as tired as your slanders, you are
worn out telling them and certainly can't defend them,
you gutless atheist coward.

Fuck off and have a long sleep, you couldn't get any more comatose
than your limp wristed libels.

# From: raven1 <quotht...@nevermore.com>
# Newsgroups: alt.atheism
# Subject: Re: Anyone seen Hysteria, Abu Baker Bashir and Kelsey
Bjarnyard? B^D
# Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 21:15:11 -0500
# Message-ID: <87ttk498t9sueojr7...@4ax.com>
#
# There has never been a "Great, Enduring Atheist Civilization"



# From: raven1 <quotht...@nevermore.com>
# Newsgroups: alt.atheism
# Subject: Re: Anyone seen Hysteria, Abu Baker Bashir
# and Kelsey Bjarnyard? B^D
# Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 21:15:11 -0500
# Message-ID: <87ttk498t9sueojr7...@4ax.com>
#
#
# > raven1 wrote:
# >
# >> Even under officially atheistic regimes such as Stalin's,

[fasgnadh]

On 10/02/2012 4:38 AM, bit r ⦿t wrote:

> WTF? ^

He was having a breakdown after I repeatedly
humiliated him in public...

JUST BY QUOTING HIM, ..VERBATIM!

Like above!

>>
>> Let me help you with that:
>>
>> "Try and think outside the Envelope!" BWAAAAAAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAAAAA
>>
>> http://www.google.com.au/search?tbm=isch&hl=en&source=hp&biw=1280&bih=881&q=stamps&gbv=2&oq=stamps&aq=f&aqi=g10&aql=&gs_sm=12&gs_upl=1849l2895l0l4818l6l6l0l0l0l0l272l752l3.2.1l6l0
>>

> Who is winning this round...

Definitely not Abu Baker Bashir! B^D

Nor you, lightweight.

[felix_unger]

On 31-January-2012 4:25 PM, fasgnadh wrote:

> On 30/01/2012 1:18 PM, DanielSan wrote:
>> On 1/29/2012 6:17 PM, felix_unger wrote:
>>> On 30-January-2012 8:44 AM, Olrik wrote:
>>>
>>>> Le 2012-01-29 02:41, felix_unger a écrit :

>>>>> On 29-January-2012 4:45 PM, Olrik wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For years, "fasgnadh" has demonstrated its atheism, yet it's
>>>>>> failed to
>>>>>> publicly acknowledged it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The question is: is "fasgnadh" an atheist,
>>>>>

>>>>> no. he's too smart for that, he wouldn't be that stupid
>>>>
>>>> Ask him if he believes in "god". See where that will go.
>>>
>>> He's agnostic. like me! :)
>>>
>>> Bonne journée!
>>
>> But does he /believe/ in "god"?
> > "I'm agnostic" is not an answer to that
>> question.
>
> "I'm agnostic" is the ONLY rational answer, unless you atheists
> can PROVE there is no God, or Theists PROVE there is.
>
> Agnosticism is based on what we KNOW and CAN KNOW,
> you atheists, influenced it seems by your Prophet Dawkins,
> are obsessed with BELIEF, your own UNFOUNDED ones and those
> of other people. You are a nosy busybodies in metaphysics,
> but you are totalitarian, trying to TELL OTHERS what they
> are!

right!

>
> If your belief, like Prophet Dawkin's below is not based
> on evidence, is not something you can know, then what
> good is talking to others about it? Because you do not
> have a listening ear, you are a crude materialist.
>
> For example, I may speak of love, my children love me.
> I love them. I cannot prove to you that they love me.
>
> I could tell you the things they do, the affection they give, the
> consideration they show, but if you do not understand love, don't
> speak the language, think kindness and affection are myths, that people
> simply do what will gain them most, then knowing you are anti-love
> I would not wish to offend you by speaking of it.
>
> Why would you ask about it.. I know that if I speak of Love
> you will mock it and sully it.

right again!

>
> # From: Budikka666 <budi...@netscape.net>
> # Newsgroups:

> alt.atheism,alt.religion,alt.religion.christian,alt.agnosticism
> # Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 03:38:16 -0800 (PST)
> # Message-ID:

> <bfcf3a9d-9711-449a...@m3g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>

> #
> # You can keep your spiritual values.
> # I'll piss on them and pass on them.
> #
> # Budikka
>

> Atheists just piss on the beliefs of others, so why would
> anyone cast pearls before atheist swine?
>
> You atheists will just do what you always do,
> fabricate a straw man, hold a show trial and
> execute them;

You are so right. and Daniel doesn't even respond. he's afraid of you.
he runs as fast as his little feet can carry him.

>
> Olrik claims he has a Divine Right to lie about you
> if he doesn't know the truth(which is always):
>
> # From: Olrik <olri...@yahoo.com>
> # Newsgroups: alt.atheism,alt.agnosticism,alt.religion
> # Subject: Re: fasgnadh is defective
> # Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2010 18:31:59 -0400
> # Message-ID: <huh7l5$tss$1...@news.eternal-september.org>
> #
> # I can claim whatever I want. One day I say you're an atheist,
> # then I claim you're a muslim.
>
> Sure, Olrik, it's called BEING A LIAR, whom no one can trust. B^]
>
> Just ONE MORE lie, from the masters of ad hom, slander
> and libel, the atheists:
>
> The only reason you want to know peoples beliefs is
> to refine your mockery to make is as hurt-full as possible.

true!

>
> Thus when replying to Christians at Easter atheists refer
> to Jesus on a stick, Muslims they make reference to cooking
> a Koran in pig fat.. and so on.
>
> You are disgustingly intolerant and hateful, and so
> for three years I have been teaching you some manners,
> many have graduated and left to lead normal lives, only
> the hard cases are left, chronic liars, congenital slanderers
> atheist whose every expelled breath is a lie, or a curse;

I've noticed! I have no respect for atheists these days. they pride
themselves on their rationality, but in reality they are unreasonable,
only concerned with maintaining their atheist position at any cost.

>
>
> # From: "John Fraser" <jfr...@ns.sympatico.ca>
> # Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.pentecostal,alt.atheism
> # Subject: Merry Christmas
> # Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2008 10:21:03 -0400
> # Message-ID: <4953abb6$1$5460$9a56...@news.aliant.net>
> #
> # Hello Folks;
> #
> # I'd like to wish all of you a very Merry Christmas
> # and a safe holiday season. Phil 4:8.
> #
> # Cheers,
> # John
>
>
>
> # From: Christopher A. Lee <ca...@optonline.net>
> # Newsgroups: alt.religion.christian.pentecostal,alt.atheism
> # Subject: Re: Merry Christmas
> # Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 16:24:01 -0500
> # Message-ID: <o07dl41sa4t4jhof3...@4ax.com>
> #
> # "go fuck yourself with your crucifix in a drill chuck'.
>
> So, aren't atheists strange folk, first they assign the
> answer they want to you.. then later, they ask the question,
> and ignore your real answer. B^D
>
> Here they are, prisoners of their fantasies:
>
> # From: Olrik <olri...@yahoo.com>
> # Newsgroups: alt.abortion,alt.atheism
> # Subject: Re: fasgnadh is an atheist
> # Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2009 00:49:38 -0500
> # Message-ID: <hd5m8q$91a$1...@news.eternal-september.org>
> #
> # fasgnadh is an atheist.
>
> # From: Olrik <olri...@yahoo.com>
> # Newsgroups:
> alt.atheism,alt.religion,alt.religion.Islam,alt.politics.republicans
> # Subject: Re: The new video from Pat Condell -- fasgnadh is a muslim
> # Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2010 01:13:01 -0400
> # Message-ID: <hufap5$ghh$1...@news.eternal-september.org>
> #
> # Oh look!
> #
> # It's fasgnadh, a.a.'s very own islamist!
>
>
> # From: Olrik <olri...@yahoo.com>
> # Newsgroups:
> alt.atheism,alt.agnosticism,alt.religion.christian,alt.religion.islam,alt.religion
> # Subject: Re: Communist states - the Historical Reality
> # Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2010 01:12:48 -0400
> # Message-ID: <hucmco$5v5$1...@news.eternal-september.org>
> #
> # fasgnadh is still an atheist, and the poor thing still refuses to
> admit it.
>
>
> # Newsgroups: alt.atheism,talk.atheism,alt.agnosticism,alt.usenet.kooks
> # Subject: Re: Atheist liars Syd Moron, China Glue and Olrik the
> # Unworthy unable to show proof of a lie -
> # demonstrates their absence of honesty... again! B^D
> # Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 14:27:26 -0700 (PDT)
> #Message-ID:<01b9d8cf-d902-4fea...@y17g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>
>
> #
> # On 31 Mrz., 22:54, fasgnadh <fasgn...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> # > Olrik joins the atheist liar tag team B^D :
> #
> # Fagsnag
> #
> # he's a closet theist.
>
>
> # From: Olrik <olri...@yahoo.com>
> # Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 16:28:41 -0400
> # Message-ID: <hp0b9v$ols$1...@news.eternal-september.org>
> #
> # fasgnadh,why don't you once and for all admit that you're an atheist ?
> #
> # It'd be the right thing to do.
>
>
> One atheist tried to warn Olrik the Unworthy
> that he wa making a fool of himself, but he's too
> foolish to listen:

>
> # From: raven1 <quoththera...@nevermore.com>
> # Newsgroups: alt.atheism,talk.atheism,alt.religion,
> # alt.politics.republicans,alt.politics.democrats,
> # uk.politics.misc,aus.politics,alt.politics.communism
> # Subject: Re: The Decline of alt atheism - and time to say farewell
> to the most trivial and useless branch of Nihilism! B^D
> # Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 16:26:06 -0400

> ^^^^^^
> # Message-ID: <n4ofb51jvj209trfh...@4ax.com>
> #

> # > Dear old "fasgnadh" asserts his deity exists, but can't prove it.

> #
> # Fasgnadh has never asserted that a deity exists, and recently admitted
> # to being agnostic. He's not here to push a deity, he's here to push
> # peoples buttons.
>
>

> Olriks button requires hardly any effort:
>
> http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_9tsuLU0jfPU/S_vwUo7hMeI/AAAAAAAAAEY/RonfSYNOVbw/s1600/easy-button.jpg
>
>
> When I push it he carries on for DAYS till he runs down,
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_73NU6OlNuw
>
>
> then I just WIND HIM UP AGAIN!
>
> BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHHAAHAAA
>
> Danielsan is now wired to the same Button!
>
> In more recent answers I outlined the usual discussion on
> agnosticism as the default rational position, etc..
> but planted a seed of ambiguity by saying belief is a private matter,
> one could be an agnostic about Alien life in the Universe,
> but secretly believe it.... no one need know.
>
> And of course now they are all full of curiosity and
> want to know my beliefs.. B^]
>
> and of course because they are such moral shitpigs, so rude
> and spiteful, so ugly in their intolerance and hateful spite..
> everyone is just RUSHING to confide in them!
>
> BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAAA
>
> When the HELL they strive to create for others on Earth FREEZES OVER!
>
> B^]
>
> http://www.munseys.com/diskfive/whiphand.jpg
>
>
> http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_a9V8a7WTTz0/S85Wgn4DqeI/AAAAAAAABCg/JM6Ezu_sFAA/s1600/The+Whip+Hand.jpg
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


--
rgds,

Pete
-------
“We sensible agnostics laugh in your general direction”

“Agnostics frustrate the hell out of atheists because they have no target to fire at”

“I'll take a position on the existence of God, when you can tell me why I have to”

“Atheists have tunnel vision. There's so much they don't see”

“Snip, run and Lie ... the atheist Trinity”

The atheists moral dilema .. http://altatheismfaq.blogspot.com/

“Atheist NG's are endless posturing, ad hom bitch fights and little else, they are parasitic, sustained by the creative attacks of their opponents and their ritualised, scripted, responses. The vacuum occurs because they only have ONE idea, and that is a mere denial that something exists, an impotent, ineffectual, useless sub branch of Nihilism, not enough to sustain an interesting after dinner chat, let alone a great and enduring civilisation”

“It is absurd self delusion for atheists to claim that they alone should be judged by their self-defining, self-serving, propaganda, rather than the REAL WORLD actions and consequences of atheism throughout history”

“Atheists just piss on the beliefs of others, so why would anyone cast pearls before atheist swine?”

"It is a sure thing that science will prove abiogenesis before creationism can disprove Evolution"

"I argue for TRUTH against error, wherever it is found. Those not interested in HONEST rational discussion and debate should just bugger off!"

[fasgnadh]

On 11/02/2012 10:45 AM, Vurgil wrote:

Vurgil the lying post forger inserted text that Dawkins never said.

> these [future] Gods came into being.

The atheists are just OBSESSED with their Gods! B^D

>> ...then Bukakke builds
>> an Atheist Altar to worship those Gods;

BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAAA

These Atheists are MORE pious than most Christians! B^D

---------

Atheists are in retreat:

Pope Dawkins declares Atheist Gods exist:


# "It’s very important to understand that these Gods
# came into being
# - Richard Dawkins

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/20/science/20dawkins.html?pagewanted=all

When did that happen? where? How many 'came into being'?
Do they have names?

WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE?!??

..Atheist activist Bukakke has built an Atheist altar to worship them;

# From: Budikka666 <budi...@netscape.net>
# Newsgroups: alt.atheism,talk.atheism,alt.talk.creationism,
alt.religion,alt.religion.christian
# Subject: Disapproving Creation:
# Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 15:23:40 -0800 (PST)
# Message-ID:
<b5430732-e52e-45b5...@p13g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>
#
#
#> come worshiping at the altar of atheism,

...and national atheist bodies have formally applied to be recognised
as a religion:

# It's Official, Atheists claim to be a persecuted RELIGION: B^D
#
#
# "THE Atheist Foundation of Australia has lodged complaints
# of religious discrimination in Melbourne and Hobart
#
# "atheism counts as a religion, Dr Perkins said."
# The Age 29/1/2009

[fasgnadh]

On 11/02/2012 10:39 AM, Vurgil wrote:

> Because they have to deny all science to keep their faith.

Vurgil tries to run interference for his porn obsessed kook-suckers

but he's too stupid to post anything that makes sense

---------

Atheists are in retreat:

Pope Dawkins declares Atheist Gods exist:

# "It’s very important to understand that these Gods
# came into being

# - Richard Dawkins

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/20/science/20dawkins.html?pagewanted=all

When did that happen? where? How many 'came into being'?
Do they have names?

WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE?!??

..Atheist activist Bukakke has built an Atheist altar to worship them;

# From: Budikka666 <budi...@netscape.net>
# Newsgroups: alt.atheism,talk.atheism,alt.talk.creationism,
alt.religion,alt.religion.christian
# Subject: Disapproving Creation:
# Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 15:23:40 -0800 (PST)
# Message-ID:
<b5430732-e52e-45b5...@p13g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>
#
#
#> come worshiping at the altar of atheism,

...and national atheist bodies have formally applied to be recognised
as a religion:

# It's Official, Atheists claim to be a persecuted RELIGION: B^D
#
#
# "THE Atheist Foundation of Australia has lodged complaints
# of religious discrimination in Melbourne and Hobart
#
# "atheism counts as a religion, Dr Perkins said."
# The Age 29/1/2009

[fasgnadh]

bittr Bum Boi reveals his fetish for dead ninety year olds:

> On 10/02/2012 9:10 PM, fasgnadh wrote:

>> bittr Bum Boi The Cake Boi fantasist wrote "Turdball rides fagsnardz's rump":
>>
>> Why do you Cake Bois all fantasise about sodomy

> You heard about the rumoured 300 jpg pics of Fagnard's mum [in the nude]
> that some atheists own?

You fantasise about dead ninety year old women, you sad little sicko!

---------

Atheists are in retreat:

Pope Dawkins declares Atheist Gods exist:

# "It’s very important to understand that these Gods
# came into being

# - Richard Dawkins

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/20/science/20dawkins.html?pagewanted=all

When did that happen? where? How many 'came into being'?
Do they have names?

WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE?!??

..Atheist activist Bukakke has built an Atheist altar to worship them;

# From: Budikka666 <budi...@netscape.net>
# Newsgroups: alt.atheism,talk.atheism,alt.talk.creationism,
alt.religion,alt.religion.christian
# Subject: Disapproving Creation:
# Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 15:23:40 -0800 (PST)
# Message-ID:
<b5430732-e52e-45b5...@p13g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>
#
#
#> come worshiping at the altar of atheism,

...and national atheist bodies have formally applied to be recognised
as a religion:

# It's Official, Atheists claim to be a persecuted RELIGION: B^D
#
#
# "THE Atheist Foundation of Australia has lodged complaints
# of religious discrimination in Melbourne and Hobart
#
# "atheism counts as a religion, Dr Perkins said."
# The Age 29/1/2009

[fasgnadh]

On 8/02/2012 7:47 PM, Colonel Jake wrote:

>> Have you thought of trying remedial English classes?
>>
>> BTW if you think Monty Python's Life Of Bwian is about Cock
>> then you probably are as stupid as your post indicates.
>>
>> Run along, lightweight, back to the other Kook-Suckers
>

> <crickets>

It looks like Private Parts

> " ... weaseled his cowardliness-self out of this one!!!..."

---------

Atheists are in retreat:

Pope Dawkins declares Atheist Gods exist:

# "It’s very important to understand that these Gods
# came into being

[fasgnadh]

On 15/02/2012 12:40 AM, felix_unger wrote:

Felix,
thanks for the link to this very comprehensive Website;


http://www.godandscience.org/apologetics/atrocities.html

Clearly from my history of posts I believe that confronting
atheists with the atheist holocausts, (and a public largely
ignorant of it), is an essential response to the endless
vilification of religion by atheists.

"Atheists, who live in Glass Houses, shouldn't throw stones"

The interesting thing is, while some Christians doornock in their
enthusiasm to spread the good news, I've never had one of them
openly LIE about me, claiming that I'm a theist, the way these
atheist BIGOTS do, insisting that I'm 'really' an atheist, or
'really' a theist, (Whichever serves their dishonest purpose at
the time).

The fact that they CONTRADICT themselves, as Olrik admits,
by claiming POLAR OPPOSITE things about me (atheist *AND* Theist B^p)
merely demonstrates that they are congenital liars, sharacter
assassins and frauds.

And the Kook-suckers, Lemon of Mockery and Bland Wizard, are
atheists attempting the same slander, but using a different
set of rhetorical tools.

By mocking them I have provoked them into laying a new set
of trumped up 'charges', as facile and dishonest as the last ones.

The vote is still a foregone conclusion, it's as rigged as the
old AQOTM (Atheist Quote of the Month), no procedural integrity,
no balanced judgement, as I have exposed by simply MOCKING them,
and documenting their reactionary response.. a NEW witchunt! ;-)

AQOTM is no more. I exposed their partisan bias, mocked their
prejudices dressed up in a corrupt process, and like the Kook
Shor trials, it was long past any usefulness, or integrity,
and collapsed under it's own prolix pretensions.

The Kook Awards are too parochial and irrelevant to warrant a similar
demolition effort, and it keeps the Kooks harmlessly engaged in
busywork with no impact whatsoever..

Whereas Atheism can clearly damage young minds, as Lenin, Stalin,
Mao and Pol Pot amply demonstrate.

>> If your belief, like Prophet Dawkin's below is not based
>> on evidence, is not something you can know, then what
>> good is talking to others about it? Because you do not
>> have a listening ear, you are a crude materialist.
>>
>> For example, I may speak of love, my children love me.
>> I love them. I cannot prove to you that they love me.
>>
>> I could tell you the things they do, the affection they give, the
>> consideration they show, but if you do not understand love, don't
>> speak the language, think kindness and affection are myths, that people
>> simply do what will gain them most, then knowing you are anti-love
>> I would not wish to offend you by speaking of it.
>>
>> Why would you ask about it.. I know that if I speak of Love
>> you will mock it and sully it.
>
> right again!

This is the saddest thing about the dismal atheists, reeking of despair..

Fasgnadh's Dad has gifted them sweet honey and balm for their aching
souls...
music that both rocks them in tyhe cradle and uplifts,
sublime poetry, images and sculpture of ecstatic beauty,
gifts of warmth, strength and Kindliness...

and none of them have ever responded.

But when I poke them with the pointy stick of reason, they
screech like Banshees and flock to the attack.

It's the only way to teach them anything.

Their paramount leaders of the past put it very clearly, Lenin,
speaking of music, said.. "It makes me want to pat people on the head,
and stroke them gently, when I have to beat them"

They are POWERED by negative energy.. it's a consequence of having
an ideology, a belief system, based around NOT BELIEVING in
something, their first response is DERISION and CONTEMPT.

They know not Love.

>>
>> # From: Budikka666 <budi...@netscape.net>
>> # Newsgroups:
>> alt.atheism,alt.religion,alt.religion.christian,alt.agnosticism
>> # Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 03:38:16 -0800 (PST)
>> # Message-ID:
>> <bfcf3a9d-9711-449a...@m3g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>
>> #
>> # You can keep your spiritual values.
>> # I'll piss on them and pass on them.
>> #
>> # Budikka
>>
>> Atheists just piss on the beliefs of others, so why would
>> anyone cast pearls before atheist swine?
>>
>> You atheists will just do what you always do,
>> fabricate a straw man, hold a show trial and
>> execute them;
>
> You are so right. and Daniel doesn't even respond. he's afraid of you.

They all are, I have outlasted their Heavy hitters, Batted their
'Warlord', Fluffy, clear out of the Park;

http://altatheismfaq.blogspot.com.au/

http://altatheismfaq.blogspot.com.au/2009/09/meet-fluffy-bawaa-factions-new-warlord.html

> he runs as fast as his little feet can carry him.

Raven and Vurgil are both reduced to post forgery!

They fabricate text, and then claim others said it, and set about
beating up on the STRAWMEN they have created...

Like the Kook's Show Trials, it's desperate and doomed to fail.

It's IDEAS which propagate.. and they don't have any! B^]

>> Olrik claims he has a Divine Right to lie about you
>> if he doesn't know the truth(which is always):
>>
>> # From: Olrik <olri...@yahoo.com>
>> # Newsgroups: alt.atheism,alt.agnosticism,alt.religion
>> # Subject: Re: fasgnadh is defective
>> # Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2010 18:31:59 -0400
>> # Message-ID: <huh7l5$tss$1...@news.eternal-september.org>
>> #
>> # I can claim whatever I want. One day I say you're an atheist,
>> # then I claim you're a muslim.
>>
>> Sure, Olrik, it's called BEING A LIAR, whom no one can trust. B^]
>>
>> Just ONE MORE lie, from the masters of ad hom, slander
>> and libel, the atheists:
>>
>> The only reason you want to know peoples beliefs is
>> to refine your mockery to make is as hurt-full as possible.
>
> true!

There is a symbiosis between the atheists and the Kook-suckers,
both are meme parasites.

They have no core, but spend their time attacking the ideas and
beliefs of others. They share a strong Judgemental streak
with the theist Inquisitions of the Dark Ages, and a punitive
Puritanism which in the Kooks is expressed in their chosen
roles as Net Nannies, and in the atheists found expression in the
Repressive and degenerate Atheist States..

---------

Atheists are in retreat:

Pope Dawkins declares Atheist Gods exist:


# "It’s very important to understand that these Gods
# came into being
# - Richard Dawkins

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/20/science/20dawkins.html?pagewanted=all

When did that happen? where? How many 'came into being'?
Do they have names?

WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE?!??

..Atheist activist Bukakke has built an Atheist altar to worship them;

# From: Budikka666 <budi...@netscape.net>