Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: Debunking atheist dogma #1 "Atheism is nothing but a non-belief in God"
0 views
Skip to first unread message
fasgnadh
Jan 26, 2012, 1:37:33 AM1/26/12
to
The Demon of Mockery {{snicker} that just cracks me up} wrote:
> On Jan 25, 2:54 pm, fasgnadh<fasgn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> On 23/01/2012 4:35 AM, Florian Kutscherauer wrote:
> <snip>
There was a definition here.. some feeble fuckwit
has snipped it and then asked for one...
Can one of his Kook mates GIVE HIM ONE! B^D
Or all of them at once, ...he usually likes that ...
>>> So you still have no clue what atheism is.
>>
>> Like other ideological falsehoods (Nazism, Racism..) It IS what
>> it DOES, not what it says about itself.
>>
>> Ask the most influential important and infamous atheists
>> in history, because atheism in action speaks louder than it's
>> words;
>>
>> "Atheism is the natural and inseparable part of Communism."
>> -Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)
>>
>> "We must combat religion"
>> -Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)
>>
>> “Down with religion and long live atheism;
>> the dissemination of atheist views is our chief task!”
>> - Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)
>>
>> "Our program necessarily includes the propaganda of atheism."
>> - Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)
>>
>> At it's most benign, atheist's print their unfounded beliefs
>> on T-Shirts and as advertising on the sides of buses, at it's
>> worst they implement it, and over 70,000,000 people die
>
> There's a definition of "atheism" in all that?
Where? What? Who asked for one? B^D
Have I told you to go fuck yourself recently?
Did you snip something and then can't find it,
you stupid kook!
> Looks like talk about it, not a "definition."
Do you need a tissue?
There might be one with the definition you just snipped.
BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAAHAHAA
>>> There is no atheist dogma.
>>
>> The No True Scots Atheist fallacy
>>
>> http://groups.google.com.au/group/alt.religion/msg/f2dad4783c9d6a57?h...
>
> Alright, then,
'Alright', -agreement with the above.
Lets move on to the next point:
> describe this "atheist dogma,"
Hey, fuckwit.. I told you I'm done with you.
Just run along and continue to x-rosspost in protest of x-posts. B^D
> I'm curious.
No you're not.
You came here complaining that I crossposted to
your sheltered workshop and you were initiating a Jihad
or some silly nonsense, in retaliation. There was a small
group of you at the time, you appear to hunt in packs
like weak thugs.. have they ran away?
And now you reveal that you don't know what I said in posts
you whined about, you weren't even 'curious' enough to READ
those posts, where all of this was explained in detail.
Which means all your subsequent whining and fulmination
including about cross-posting has no foundation, you
were just on some mad vendetta, making threats, lying about
posts you haven't even read, and ultimitely, having nothing
but a PISSY little, hypocritical whine about crossposts,
which you now admit may have had some relevance to that NG,
but you wouldn't know, becasue you never read them!
WoW.
Who don't you just bugger off and find out what you
rejected out of hand, and, with the other Two Stooges
have been whining about, misrepresenting and plain LYING
about, ever since.
In the vernacular: Go Fuck Yourself.
> Please be precise.
Sure.. Go Fuck Yourself ..with a pineapple.
> Snarky
I feared you might enjoy it..
Oh, as you were leaving, this fell out of your ragged arse:
Could it be the definition you are asking me to find for you,
It's not my job to do your research or your thinking, for you.
but I know atheists put them up on buses to convert people
to their beliefs:
[BTW Rational people decide what they think of Nazism based
on the pile of smoking bodies, rather than what THEY
say about themselves, but you clearly you prefer the
weasel words of hypocritical liars, like yourself; ]
http://www.thearrogantatheist.com/mensnogod.html
Oh, one more thing, you might want to take a look
at the post subject.. while you are scratching
about in the bath, trying to find your arse with both hands.
BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAAA
Which reminds me, has anyone explained this piece of atheist
Dogma below, - claims made without evidence, from Prophet Dawkins;
I've been asking for some time now and so far the only response
was some dumbfuck Kooks, with no answer of course, bleating that
it was TOO LONG and "hurts my brane".
--
Ex- Atheist, now Prophet, Richard Dawkins claims a "superpowerful
intelligent and moral energy" entity, "like God", is plausible and
could have 'evolved' somewhere in the Universe "by an explicable
scientific progression of incremental evolution", (which no
atheist can explain). B^D
# "After two hours of conversation, Professor Dawkins walks far afield.
# He talks of the possibility that we might co-evolve with computers, a
# silicon destiny. And he’s intrigued by the playful, even soul-stirring
# writings of Freeman Dyson, the theoretical physicist.
#
# 'In one essay, Professor Dyson casts millions of speculative years
# into the future. Our galaxy is dying and humans have evolved into
# something like bolts of superpowerful intelligent and moral energy.
#
# Doesn’t that description sound an awful lot like God?
#
# "Certainly," Professor Dawkins replies. "It’s highly plausible that
# in the universe there are God-like creatures."
#
# He raises his hand, just in case a reader thinks he’s gone around a
# religious bend. "It’s very important to understand that these Gods
# came into being by an explicable scientific progression of
# incremental evolution."'
#
# Could they be immortal? The professor shrugs.
#
# “Probably not.” He smiles and adds, “But I
# wouldn’t want to be too dogmatic about that.”"
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/20/science/20dawkins.html?pagewanted=all
So, which atheist is going to explain the inexplicable,
unscientific, BELIEF in "these {atheist] Gods", with no proof
whatsoever, and show us the evidence of how, and where, God evolved?
...........................................................
...........................................................
...........................................................
---------
alt.atheism FAQ:
http://altatheismfaq.blogspot.com/
http://groups.google.com.au/group/alt.atheism/msg/7c0978c14fd4ed37?hl=en&dmode=source
"Atheism is the natural and inseparable part of Communism."
-Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)
"We must combat religion"
-Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)
“Down with religion and long live atheism;
the dissemination of atheist views is our chief task!”
- Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)
"Our program necessarily includes the propaganda of atheism."
- Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)
http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:8290?context=latest
http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:8295?context=latest
http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:6348?context=latest
http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:17478?context=latest
"How can you make a revolution without firing squads?"
- Lenin
http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:17475?context=latest
http://www.c96trading.com/Nagant_NKVD_300h.jpg
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/telegraph/multimedia/archive/01001/Tsar-family_1001874c.jpg
> On Jan 25, 2:54 pm, fasgnadh<fasgn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> On 23/01/2012 4:35 AM, Florian Kutscherauer wrote:
> <snip>
There was a definition here.. some feeble fuckwit
has snipped it and then asked for one...
Can one of his Kook mates GIVE HIM ONE! B^D
Or all of them at once, ...he usually likes that ...
>>> So you still have no clue what atheism is.
>>
>> Like other ideological falsehoods (Nazism, Racism..) It IS what
>> it DOES, not what it says about itself.
>>
>> Ask the most influential important and infamous atheists
>> in history, because atheism in action speaks louder than it's
>> words;
>>
>> "Atheism is the natural and inseparable part of Communism."
>> -Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)
>>
>> "We must combat religion"
>> -Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)
>>
>> “Down with religion and long live atheism;
>> the dissemination of atheist views is our chief task!”
>> - Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)
>>
>> "Our program necessarily includes the propaganda of atheism."
>> - Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)
>>
>> At it's most benign, atheist's print their unfounded beliefs
>> on T-Shirts and as advertising on the sides of buses, at it's
>> worst they implement it, and over 70,000,000 people die
>
> There's a definition of "atheism" in all that?
Where? What? Who asked for one? B^D
Have I told you to go fuck yourself recently?
Did you snip something and then can't find it,
you stupid kook!
> Looks like talk about it, not a "definition."
Do you need a tissue?
There might be one with the definition you just snipped.
BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAAHAHAA
>>> There is no atheist dogma.
>>
>> The No True Scots Atheist fallacy
>>
>> http://groups.google.com.au/group/alt.religion/msg/f2dad4783c9d6a57?h...
>
> Alright, then,
'Alright', -agreement with the above.
Lets move on to the next point:
> describe this "atheist dogma,"
Hey, fuckwit.. I told you I'm done with you.
Just run along and continue to x-rosspost in protest of x-posts. B^D
> I'm curious.
No you're not.
You came here complaining that I crossposted to
your sheltered workshop and you were initiating a Jihad
or some silly nonsense, in retaliation. There was a small
group of you at the time, you appear to hunt in packs
like weak thugs.. have they ran away?
And now you reveal that you don't know what I said in posts
you whined about, you weren't even 'curious' enough to READ
those posts, where all of this was explained in detail.
Which means all your subsequent whining and fulmination
including about cross-posting has no foundation, you
were just on some mad vendetta, making threats, lying about
posts you haven't even read, and ultimitely, having nothing
but a PISSY little, hypocritical whine about crossposts,
which you now admit may have had some relevance to that NG,
but you wouldn't know, becasue you never read them!
WoW.
Who don't you just bugger off and find out what you
rejected out of hand, and, with the other Two Stooges
have been whining about, misrepresenting and plain LYING
about, ever since.
In the vernacular: Go Fuck Yourself.
> Please be precise.
Sure.. Go Fuck Yourself ..with a pineapple.
> Snarky
I feared you might enjoy it..
Oh, as you were leaving, this fell out of your ragged arse:
Could it be the definition you are asking me to find for you,
It's not my job to do your research or your thinking, for you.
but I know atheists put them up on buses to convert people
to their beliefs:
[BTW Rational people decide what they think of Nazism based
on the pile of smoking bodies, rather than what THEY
say about themselves, but you clearly you prefer the
weasel words of hypocritical liars, like yourself; ]
http://www.thearrogantatheist.com/mensnogod.html
Oh, one more thing, you might want to take a look
at the post subject.. while you are scratching
about in the bath, trying to find your arse with both hands.
BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAAA
Which reminds me, has anyone explained this piece of atheist
Dogma below, - claims made without evidence, from Prophet Dawkins;
I've been asking for some time now and so far the only response
was some dumbfuck Kooks, with no answer of course, bleating that
it was TOO LONG and "hurts my brane".
--
Ex- Atheist, now Prophet, Richard Dawkins claims a "superpowerful
intelligent and moral energy" entity, "like God", is plausible and
could have 'evolved' somewhere in the Universe "by an explicable
scientific progression of incremental evolution", (which no
atheist can explain). B^D
# "After two hours of conversation, Professor Dawkins walks far afield.
# He talks of the possibility that we might co-evolve with computers, a
# silicon destiny. And he’s intrigued by the playful, even soul-stirring
# writings of Freeman Dyson, the theoretical physicist.
#
# 'In one essay, Professor Dyson casts millions of speculative years
# into the future. Our galaxy is dying and humans have evolved into
# something like bolts of superpowerful intelligent and moral energy.
#
# Doesn’t that description sound an awful lot like God?
#
# "Certainly," Professor Dawkins replies. "It’s highly plausible that
# in the universe there are God-like creatures."
#
# He raises his hand, just in case a reader thinks he’s gone around a
# religious bend. "It’s very important to understand that these Gods
# came into being by an explicable scientific progression of
# incremental evolution."'
#
# Could they be immortal? The professor shrugs.
#
# “Probably not.” He smiles and adds, “But I
# wouldn’t want to be too dogmatic about that.”"
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/20/science/20dawkins.html?pagewanted=all
So, which atheist is going to explain the inexplicable,
unscientific, BELIEF in "these {atheist] Gods", with no proof
whatsoever, and show us the evidence of how, and where, God evolved?
...........................................................
...........................................................
...........................................................
---------
alt.atheism FAQ:
http://altatheismfaq.blogspot.com/
http://groups.google.com.au/group/alt.atheism/msg/7c0978c14fd4ed37?hl=en&dmode=source
"Atheism is the natural and inseparable part of Communism."
-Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)
"We must combat religion"
-Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)
“Down with religion and long live atheism;
the dissemination of atheist views is our chief task!”
- Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)
"Our program necessarily includes the propaganda of atheism."
- Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)
http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:8290?context=latest
http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:8295?context=latest
http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:6348?context=latest
http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:17478?context=latest
"How can you make a revolution without firing squads?"
- Lenin
http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:17475?context=latest
http://www.c96trading.com/Nagant_NKVD_300h.jpg
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/telegraph/multimedia/archive/01001/Tsar-family_1001874c.jpg
The Demon of Mockery
Jan 26, 2012, 4:20:02 AM1/26/12
to
Hail Eris! On Jan 25, 10:37 pm, fasgnadh wrote:
> The Demon of Mockery {{snicker} that just cracks me up} wrote:
Credit Charles Daniels of rec.arts.drwho, copyright 1999. If you're
> The Demon of Mockery {{snicker} that just cracks me up} wrote:
really curious, set the search parameters to October 17th-December
15th or so, with both "Snarky" and "Demon of Mockery," plus
<feeto...@home.commie>, IIRC.
> > On Jan 25, 2:54 pm, fasgnadh wrote:
> >> On 23/01/2012 4:35 AM, Florian Kutscherauer wrote:
> > <snip>
>
> There was a definition here.. some feeble fuckwit
> has snipped it and then asked for one...
Oh, please, you don't seriously expect me to dig through all your
> > <snip>
>
> There was a definition here.. some feeble fuckwit
> has snipped it and then asked for one...
screed, looking for something which most likely begs the question
anyway, do you? You are one thoroughly self-absorbed writer, and very
much given to logical fallacies. The least you could do is highlight
it.
> Can one of his Kook mates GIVE HIM ONE! B^D
>
> Or all of them at once, ...he usually likes that ...
Not this month, because nothing is going to stop the Pissbum
Powerhouse of Florida from taking home a slew of additional awards, to
go with the ones he won before his incarceration for cyber-stalking,
but you're a newbie k00k, with many years in your career ahead of you.
I'm sure that rampant homophobia will eventually get you everything
you deserve...
> >>> So you still have no clue what atheism is.
>
> >> Like other ideological falsehoods (Nazism, Racism..) It IS what
> >> it DOES, not what it says about itself.
>
> >> Ask the most influential important and infamous atheists
> >> in history, because atheism in action speaks louder than it's
> >> words;
>
> >> "Atheism is the natural and inseparable part of Communism."
> >> -Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)
>
> >> "We must combat religion"
> >> -Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)
>
> >> “Down with religion and long live atheism;
> >> the dissemination of atheist views is our chief task!”
> >> - Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)
>
> >> "Our program necessarily includes the propaganda of atheism."
> >> - Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)
>
> >> At it's most benign, atheist's print their unfounded beliefs
> >> on T-Shirts and as advertising on the sides of buses, at it's
> >> worst they implement it, and over 70,000,000 people die
>
> > There's a definition of "atheism" in all that?
>
> Where? What? Who asked for one? B^D
>
> Have I told you to go fuck yourself recently?
> Did you snip something and then can't find it,
> you stupid kook!
line posts, in reply to your own screedbombs, could easily cause hard
drive crashes, in some quarters.
> > Looks like talk about it, not a "definition."
>
> Do you need a tissue?
> There might be one with the definition you just snipped.
-- that definition should at least be easy to find. Mind you, if you
just mean, "Atheists are what they do," then it makes no sense at all,
since there was only one Iosif Vissarionovich, and most atheists,
therefore, are not him.
> BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAAHAHAA
<spins umbrella to deflect all the foamage>
> >>> There is no atheist dogma.
>
> >> The No True Scots Atheist fallacy
>
> >>http://groups.google.com.au/group/alt.religion/msg/f2dad4783c9d6a57?h...
>
> > Alright, then,
>
> 'Alright', -agreement with the above.
argument*.
> Lets move on to the next point:
>
> > describe this "atheist dogma,"
>
> Hey, fuckwit.. I told you I'm done with you.
is as easy as looking at the front thirty threads on GG.
> Just run along and continue to x-rosspost in protest of x-posts. B^D
seem to be an attention whore. One more time: AUK would _never_ get
new k00ks to tag, without x-poasting, so I'm being *gentle* with you,
in light of your claimed agnosticism -- you could escape winning
awards, by simply vanishing from AUK, if you really wished to avoid my
pokes, because I'm generally too lazy to work at showcasing k00ks. If
I have to seek them out, and push them onstage, they really have to be
worth the effort, but you have volunteered to be a star attraction
among the previously unrecognised street-corner crazies of usenet. Why
work hard for some AUK-shy k00k who may only be worth a few awards, in
their whole usenet lifetime, if some clueless freakazoid from Tau Ceti
is willing to k00kdance without even being asked?
> > I'm curious.
>
> No you're not.
spittle to find what might be some childish fallacy, but still,
curious.
> You came here complaining that I crossposted to
> your sheltered workshop and you were initiating a Jihad
> or some silly nonsense, in retaliation. There was a small
> group of you at the time, you appear to hunt in packs
> like weak thugs.. have they ran away?
of kookery is regarded very highly as a form of entertainment, of
schadenfreude. IOW, feel free to carry on with the foam and santorum,
it's funny, and will earn you many valuable prizes. No respect, mind
you, but you don't seem to want that anyway.
Snarky
fasgnadh
Jan 26, 2012, 7:01:38 AM1/26/12
to
The Lemon of AdHockery can't find something, can you help?:
Who do you think cares?
self-absorbed foaming from the Kook narcissist flushed.
>.. >.. >..
arse you parasitic leech, and do your own fucking RESEARCH!
> you don't seriously expect me to
No, of course not you're a whining, weak-minded, lazy cretin,
I EXPECT you to have snipped what you're now requesting,
without having read it to discover what you now want me
to go fetch for you!
BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAA
Have you still got that pineapple? re-insert it.
You know what your problem is, don't you?
>..
> one
>thoroughly self-absorbed
Yes, lift your game you witless, unoriginal twonk,
or I will get bored and ignore you.
You clearly can't answer any questions put to you
oh, BTW some of your hot air blew the foam off your
fermenting frogshit.
> The least you could do is highlight it.
You don't know what a definition looks like? B^D
Ok, you put the text back, ask me nicely and
answer 3 questions and I will highlight it
for you.
B^]
>
>> Can one of his Kook mates GIVE HIM ONE! B^D
>>
>> Or all of them at once, ...he usually likes that ...
>
> FYI, gay-laming an out queer
Oh, are you a cake boi? I never knew, and don't care.
I thought you just liked being a jizz bucket for Kooks
Please stop all this self-justification, threats,
and whining, it really doesn't sit well with begging
an agnostic to find you a definition you can't locate...
Are you always this whiney or are you having your period?
> Not this month
too much frothing, not enough bubbling:
>..
>..
>..
they can twist words endlessly.... B^D
Hence Lemon's need for some text to weave his Weasel Words
around!
The world of historical evidence is my domain:
>>>> Ask the most influential important and infamous atheists
>>>> in history, because atheism in action speaks louder than it's
>>>> words;
>>
>>>> "Atheism is the natural and inseparable part of Communism."
>>>> -Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)
>>
>>>> "We must combat religion"
>>>> -Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)
>>
>>>> “Down with religion and long live atheism;
>>>> the dissemination of atheist views is our chief task!”
>>>> - Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)
>>
>>>> "Our program necessarily includes the propaganda of atheism."
>>>> - Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)
>>
>>>> At it's most benign, atheist's print their unfounded beliefs
>>>> on T-Shirts and as advertising on the sides of buses, at it's
>>>> worst they implement it, and over 70,000,000 people die
>>
>>> There's a definition of "atheism" in all that?
>>
>> Where? What? Who asked for one? B^D
You missed some questions there, bub.
No one will help you if a) you don't help yourself and
b) you don't reciprocate
Who wants a definition of atheism?
A: You.
So you are asking for a favour, I have no
obligation whatsoever.. it's not required
as evidence for any claim I have made,
in contrast to you Kooks, who slander without
proof, and when challenged, hurl insults and ad hom,
lies and Libel...
And now you want a FAVOUR? tsk tsk
Where were you socialised, Bum Boy for paedophile priests?
Cabin slut for Russian Sailors? Rent Boy in Manila?
>> Have I told you to go fuck yourself recently?
>
> No,
Let me remedy that....
>> Did you snip something and then can't find it,
>> you stupid kook!
>
> Well,
>... >... >...
Three lines of Froth to say "Yes" and then "No" !
You don't really help yourself do you, you lazy bludger?
>>> Looks like talk about it, not a "definition."
>>
>> Do you need a tissue?
>
> You train very quickly.
Sure I'm a quick study..
How many people will you ask for the definition
of atheism you want, s - l - o - w b - o - y ?
>> There might be one with the definition you just snipped.
>
> Again, acres of screed,
Thanks for the warning
> snip
> Snippedy
> Snip
> Snip
> Snip Snip
How can I make this clear to you
You get nothing from me, you rude, ignorant, self-inflating,
kook thug.
Your threats ended any rational discussion.
>> BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAAHAHAA
>
> <spins umbrella
Spare us your stage directions, I don't want to watch you dance.
You're here to get somethign from me.
I have no further use for you.
And your limited, REPETITIOUS repertoire is just BORING ME!
>>>>> There is no atheist dogma.
>>
>>>> The No True Scots Atheist fallacy
>>
>>>> http://groups.google.com.au/group/alt.religion/msg/f2dad4783c9d6a57?h...
>>
>>> Alright, then,
>>
>> 'Alright', -agreement with the above.
>
> ...No, not really, just momentarily granting it *for the sake of
> argument*.
>
>> Lets move on to the next point:
>>
>>> describe this "atheist dogma,"
>>
>> Hey, fuckwit.. I told you I'm done with you.
>
> Ah, but I'm not done with you,
So you are just going to yap at my heels begging me
to tell you what you snipped from my post
and now want me to find for you, again..
Cool.
I will call you 'Spot', can you do any tricks, fetch,
roll over?
> definitely
Good Boy
Will you pine if I leave for Tonga, El Nido, China and the States
for three months?
> not as long as finding you is as easy
> as looking at the front thirty threads on GG.
Yes I am popular, aren't I, but those people READ the posts,
you just slobber, bury the posts in the yard,
bark that you can't find the bone that was in one of them,
and leave hair on the rug...
And I won't be in USENET when I'm diving in Tonga and El Nido,
you moron!
But Fine, wait for me by the door, Spot
and all you have to do is show me you can find your
OWN definition of atheism, and not be a fucking parasite leeching
off my intellect, and I will set up a kennel for you.
>> Just run along and continue to x-rosspost in protest of x-posts. B^D
Is there an explanation for your rank hypocrisy?
Are you going to tell us that YOU have a reason
for crossposting, when we all know you STUPID KOOK-SUCKERS
never asked IF I HAD ONE, and you never even READ MY POSTS,
to find out.. !?! Man, you really are a fucking KOOK, Spot
So what's your reason for being a hypocrite and crossposting
when you kooks think it's a crime worthy of STALKING, as your
threats have made clear!? B^[
> I've tried several times to insert a clue
Did it hurt your rectum?
> I'm being *gentle*
Well, ANSWER THE FUCKING QUESTION, instead of your
endless whining self-justification, OR
STICK YOUR CROSS POSTS UP YOUR ARSE AND SEE IF LIKE THAT,
OR jam Bland Lizards head up there.. you x-posting hypocrite..
> you could escape winning awards, by simply vanishing from AUK,
So, your goal is to silence people who want to use Usenet,
(That's not Kooky, that's Fascist).
without establishing WHY they post, or having any concern
about the CONTENT, because you admit not reading them..
And you threaten to Stalk me, and write my name in
your book of people you don't like, for using Usenet
in the manner it was designed for..
Sorry Spot.. You can't stay with me,
you are RABID, and need to be put down..
> if you really wished to avoid my pokes,
Threats of stalking weren't enough, now you
want to arse rape me.. you filthy depraved Kook-Sucker! 8^o
> I'm generally too lazy to work
we all know. I've been telling you that.
You train well, Spot.
Have you found that definition you begged me for?
The one you snipped you stupid twonk!
Too much foam to shovel this time,
let it sit till the fetid pile of self-referential
shite just rots away;
> at showcasing k00ks. If
> I have to seek them out, and push them onstage, they really have to be
> worth the effort, but you have volunteered to be a star attraction
> among the previously unrecognised street-corner crazies of usenet. Why
> work hard for some AUK-shy k00k who may only be worth a few awards, in
> their whole usenet lifetime, if some clueless freakazoid from Tau Ceti
> is willing to k00kdance without even being asked?
Your posts are too long, witless and entirely obsessed
with your insular, hermetically sealed Kook-Sucker Konclave..
and don't have the redeeming merit of saying anything of interest
to a non-Kook
>>> I'm curious.
>>
>> No you're not.
>
> Oh, but I am. Not curious enough to wade through an ocean of your
> spittle to find what might be some childish fallacy,
Like I said, not curious.
Suit yourself.
>> You came here complaining that I crossposted to
>> your sheltered workshop and you were initiating a Jihad
>> or some silly nonsense, in retaliation. There was a small
>> group of you at the time, you appear to hunt in packs
>> like weak thugs.. have they ran away?
>
> No, I told you you appeared "as if by magic,"in AUK,
Magic?
You don't understand how Usenet works, or digital
communication, networks, fibre, posting...?
What a dumb little kook-Sucker you are.
None of that is magic, Usenet was designed to support
cross-posting to multiple domains.. that was intelligent
design, you were just born the way you are... thick-as-pigshit
> where your sort
> of kookery is regarded very highly as a form of entertainment,
Sure, but yours is amateur hour, you lamer
What will you do now
> carry on with the foam and santorum,
> Snarky
Perhaps you should remove the pineapple
and try and get some sleep, your posts
show you are just getting WEAKER.
> Hail Eris! On Jan 25, 10:37 pm, fasgnadh wrote:
>> The Demon of Mockery {{snicker} that just cracks me up} wrote:
>
> Credit Charles Daniels of rec.arts.drwho, copyright 1999
Oh please, spare us your fucking PEDIGREE...
>> The Demon of Mockery {{snicker} that just cracks me up} wrote:
>
> Credit Charles Daniels of rec.arts.drwho, copyright 1999
Who do you think cares?
self-absorbed foaming from the Kook narcissist flushed.
>.. >.. >..
>
>>> On Jan 25, 2:54 pm, fasgnadh wrote:
>>>> On 23/01/2012 4:35 AM, Florian Kutscherauer wrote:
>>> <snip>
>>
>> There was a definition here.. some feeble fuckwit
>> has snipped it and then asked for one...
>
> Oh, please,
Begging won't work, you lazy Kook, get up off your
>>> On Jan 25, 2:54 pm, fasgnadh wrote:
>>>> On 23/01/2012 4:35 AM, Florian Kutscherauer wrote:
>>> <snip>
>>
>> There was a definition here.. some feeble fuckwit
>> has snipped it and then asked for one...
>
> Oh, please,
arse you parasitic leech, and do your own fucking RESEARCH!
> you don't seriously expect me to
I EXPECT you to have snipped what you're now requesting,
without having read it to discover what you now want me
to go fetch for you!
BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAA
Have you still got that pineapple? re-insert it.
You know what your problem is, don't you?
>..
> one
>thoroughly self-absorbed
> and
> very much given to logical fallacies
>..
> very much given to logical fallacies
Yes, lift your game you witless, unoriginal twonk,
or I will get bored and ignore you.
You clearly can't answer any questions put to you
oh, BTW some of your hot air blew the foam off your
fermenting frogshit.
> The least you could do is highlight it.
Ok, you put the text back, ask me nicely and
answer 3 questions and I will highlight it
for you.
B^]
>
>> Can one of his Kook mates GIVE HIM ONE! B^D
>>
>> Or all of them at once, ...he usually likes that ...
>
> FYI, gay-laming an out queer
I thought you just liked being a jizz bucket for Kooks
Please stop all this self-justification, threats,
and whining, it really doesn't sit well with begging
an agnostic to find you a definition you can't locate...
Are you always this whiney or are you having your period?
> Not this month
too much frothing, not enough bubbling:
>..
>..
>..
>..
>
>>>>> So you still have no clue what atheism is.
>>
>>>> Like other ideological falsehoods (Nazism, Racism..) It IS what
>>>> it DOES, not what it says about itself.
But Kooks know they while they can't cha,
>
>>>>> So you still have no clue what atheism is.
>>
>>>> Like other ideological falsehoods (Nazism, Racism..) It IS what
>>>> it DOES, not what it says about itself.
they can twist words endlessly.... B^D
Hence Lemon's need for some text to weave his Weasel Words
around!
The world of historical evidence is my domain:
>>>> Ask the most influential important and infamous atheists
>>>> in history, because atheism in action speaks louder than it's
>>>> words;
>>
>>>> "Atheism is the natural and inseparable part of Communism."
>>>> -Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)
>>
>>>> "We must combat religion"
>>>> -Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)
>>
>>>> “Down with religion and long live atheism;
>>>> the dissemination of atheist views is our chief task!”
>>>> - Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)
>>
>>>> "Our program necessarily includes the propaganda of atheism."
>>>> - Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)
>>
>>>> At it's most benign, atheist's print their unfounded beliefs
>>>> on T-Shirts and as advertising on the sides of buses, at it's
>>>> worst they implement it, and over 70,000,000 people die
>>
>>> There's a definition of "atheism" in all that?
>>
>> Where? What? Who asked for one? B^D
No one will help you if a) you don't help yourself and
b) you don't reciprocate
Who wants a definition of atheism?
A: You.
So you are asking for a favour, I have no
obligation whatsoever.. it's not required
as evidence for any claim I have made,
in contrast to you Kooks, who slander without
proof, and when challenged, hurl insults and ad hom,
lies and Libel...
And now you want a FAVOUR? tsk tsk
Where were you socialised, Bum Boy for paedophile priests?
Cabin slut for Russian Sailors? Rent Boy in Manila?
>> Have I told you to go fuck yourself recently?
>
> No,
>> Did you snip something and then can't find it,
>> you stupid kook!
>
> Well,
Three lines of Froth to say "Yes" and then "No" !
You don't really help yourself do you, you lazy bludger?
>>> Looks like talk about it, not a "definition."
>>
>> Do you need a tissue?
>
> You train very quickly.
How many people will you ask for the definition
of atheism you want, s - l - o - w b - o - y ?
>> There might be one with the definition you just snipped.
>
> Again, acres of screed,
> snip
> Snippedy
> Snip
> Snip
> Snip Snip
How can I make this clear to you
You get nothing from me, you rude, ignorant, self-inflating,
kook thug.
Your threats ended any rational discussion.
>> BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAAHAHAA
>
> <spins umbrella
Spare us your stage directions, I don't want to watch you dance.
You're here to get somethign from me.
I have no further use for you.
And your limited, REPETITIOUS repertoire is just BORING ME!
>>>>> There is no atheist dogma.
>>
>>>> The No True Scots Atheist fallacy
>>
>>>> http://groups.google.com.au/group/alt.religion/msg/f2dad4783c9d6a57?h...
>>
>>> Alright, then,
>>
>> 'Alright', -agreement with the above.
>
> ...No, not really, just momentarily granting it *for the sake of
> argument*.
>
>> Lets move on to the next point:
>>
>>> describe this "atheist dogma,"
>>
>> Hey, fuckwit.. I told you I'm done with you.
>
> Ah, but I'm not done with you,
to tell you what you snipped from my post
and now want me to find for you, again..
Cool.
I will call you 'Spot', can you do any tricks, fetch,
roll over?
> definitely
Good Boy
Will you pine if I leave for Tonga, El Nido, China and the States
for three months?
> not as long as finding you is as easy
> as looking at the front thirty threads on GG.
you just slobber, bury the posts in the yard,
bark that you can't find the bone that was in one of them,
and leave hair on the rug...
And I won't be in USENET when I'm diving in Tonga and El Nido,
you moron!
But Fine, wait for me by the door, Spot
and all you have to do is show me you can find your
OWN definition of atheism, and not be a fucking parasite leeching
off my intellect, and I will set up a kennel for you.
>> Just run along and continue to x-rosspost in protest of x-posts. B^D
Are you going to tell us that YOU have a reason
for crossposting, when we all know you STUPID KOOK-SUCKERS
never asked IF I HAD ONE, and you never even READ MY POSTS,
to find out.. !?! Man, you really are a fucking KOOK, Spot
So what's your reason for being a hypocrite and crossposting
when you kooks think it's a crime worthy of STALKING, as your
threats have made clear!? B^[
> I've tried several times to insert a clue
> I'm being *gentle*
Well, ANSWER THE FUCKING QUESTION, instead of your
endless whining self-justification, OR
STICK YOUR CROSS POSTS UP YOUR ARSE AND SEE IF LIKE THAT,
OR jam Bland Lizards head up there.. you x-posting hypocrite..
> you could escape winning awards, by simply vanishing from AUK,
(That's not Kooky, that's Fascist).
without establishing WHY they post, or having any concern
about the CONTENT, because you admit not reading them..
And you threaten to Stalk me, and write my name in
your book of people you don't like, for using Usenet
in the manner it was designed for..
Sorry Spot.. You can't stay with me,
you are RABID, and need to be put down..
> if you really wished to avoid my pokes,
want to arse rape me.. you filthy depraved Kook-Sucker! 8^o
> I'm generally too lazy to work
You train well, Spot.
Have you found that definition you begged me for?
The one you snipped you stupid twonk!
Too much foam to shovel this time,
let it sit till the fetid pile of self-referential
shite just rots away;
> at showcasing k00ks. If
> I have to seek them out, and push them onstage, they really have to be
> worth the effort, but you have volunteered to be a star attraction
> among the previously unrecognised street-corner crazies of usenet. Why
> work hard for some AUK-shy k00k who may only be worth a few awards, in
> their whole usenet lifetime, if some clueless freakazoid from Tau Ceti
> is willing to k00kdance without even being asked?
with your insular, hermetically sealed Kook-Sucker Konclave..
and don't have the redeeming merit of saying anything of interest
to a non-Kook
>>> I'm curious.
>>
>> No you're not.
>
> Oh, but I am. Not curious enough to wade through an ocean of your
> spittle to find what might be some childish fallacy,
Suit yourself.
>> You came here complaining that I crossposted to
>> your sheltered workshop and you were initiating a Jihad
>> or some silly nonsense, in retaliation. There was a small
>> group of you at the time, you appear to hunt in packs
>> like weak thugs.. have they ran away?
>
> No, I told you you appeared "as if by magic,"in AUK,
You don't understand how Usenet works, or digital
communication, networks, fibre, posting...?
What a dumb little kook-Sucker you are.
None of that is magic, Usenet was designed to support
cross-posting to multiple domains.. that was intelligent
design, you were just born the way you are... thick-as-pigshit
> where your sort
> of kookery is regarded very highly as a form of entertainment,
> carry on with the foam and santorum,
Perhaps you should remove the pineapple
and try and get some sleep, your posts
show you are just getting WEAKER.
"Atheism is the natural and inseparable part of Communism."
-Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)
"We must combat religion"
-Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)
“Down with religion and long live atheism;
the dissemination of atheist views is our chief task!”
- Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)
"Our program necessarily includes the propaganda of atheism."
- Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)
-Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)
"We must combat religion"
-Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)
“Down with religion and long live atheism;
the dissemination of atheist views is our chief task!”
- Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)
"Our program necessarily includes the propaganda of atheism."
- Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)
0 new messages