Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Let's be honest: If there's a god he would be opposed to gay marriage
1 view
Skip to first unread message
His Higness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher
Mar 29, 2013, 11:36:53 AM3/29/13
to
Such is clearly the case as he created a man and a woman, or so the
story goes. If gays appeal to marriage, they better profess their
atheistic or at least Pagan credentials. When they do so, I'll
carefully study their case before I pronounce a verdict. The Greeks
didn't have any objection to homosexuality but their gods were quite
fun and open minded.
I think we may as well dump Christianity and turn to the fun-seeking
Olympian Greek gods. Dionysus has a Spring festival dedicated to him
so we can go out and have some wine. "Hey --I'm talking to the gays--
do whatever, just don't bother me anymore with democracy and gay
issues."
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://webspawner.com/users/BANANAREVOLUTION
story goes. If gays appeal to marriage, they better profess their
atheistic or at least Pagan credentials. When they do so, I'll
carefully study their case before I pronounce a verdict. The Greeks
didn't have any objection to homosexuality but their gods were quite
fun and open minded.
I think we may as well dump Christianity and turn to the fun-seeking
Olympian Greek gods. Dionysus has a Spring festival dedicated to him
so we can go out and have some wine. "Hey --I'm talking to the gays--
do whatever, just don't bother me anymore with democracy and gay
issues."
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://webspawner.com/users/BANANAREVOLUTION
His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher
Mar 29, 2013, 12:46:57 PM3/29/13
to
On Mar 29, 11:48 am, "Kitty P" <kittyp2...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> "His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher"<thetibetanmon...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:7a6638d7-ff5c-453f...@u20g2000yqj.googlegroups.com...
> Well that's it then. That particular Christian God must be dead. What a
> shame to go the way of so many other Gods.
Hey, we got to celebrate something, don't we? ;)
> "His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher"<thetibetanmon...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:7a6638d7-ff5c-453f...@u20g2000yqj.googlegroups.com...
> shame to go the way of so many other Gods.
Hey, we got to celebrate something, don't we? ;)
His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher
Mar 29, 2013, 1:33:08 PM3/29/13
to
"Atheist" is such a strong word. Not everybody is willing to "come out
of the closet" and say, "Look, mom, I'm an atheist." Modern moms are
supposed to understand, "Look, mom, I'm gay."
I wonder why the double standards...
His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher
Mar 30, 2013, 12:30:24 PM3/30/13
to
On Mar 30, 11:22 am, Liberal Here <liberalh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mar 29, 11:39 am, "His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble
> of animals...including horses and (recently discovered) penguins.
>
> I'd label you "stupid" but that doesn't do ya justice.
Hey, we are not an animal. Well, we are but we have a powerful brain
to behave in a civilized way. You may argue that incest is also common
in the animal world.
How about "threesomes"? Group sex is also found in the animal world...
God is fine with incest though since Cain must have "married" a
sister.
See all the possible contradictions?
> On Mar 29, 11:39 am, "His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Philosopher" <thetibetanmon...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Such is clearly the case as he created a man and a woman, or so the
> > story goes. If gays appeal to marriage, they better profess their
> > atheistic or at least Pagan credentials. When they do so, I'll
> > carefully study their case before I pronounce a verdict. The Greeks
> > didn't have any objection to homosexuality but their gods were quite
> > fun and open minded.
>
> > I think we may as well dump Christianity and turn to the fun-seeking
> > Olympian Greek gods. Dionysus has a Spring festival dedicated to him
> > so we can go out and have some wine. "Hey --I'm talking to the gays--
> > do whatever, just don't bother me anymore with democracy and gay
> > issues."
>
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> >http://webspawner.com/users/BANANAREVOLUTION
>
> Hmmmm, perhaps you'd care to explain homosexuality in several species
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Philosopher" <thetibetanmon...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Such is clearly the case as he created a man and a woman, or so the
> > story goes. If gays appeal to marriage, they better profess their
> > atheistic or at least Pagan credentials. When they do so, I'll
> > carefully study their case before I pronounce a verdict. The Greeks
> > didn't have any objection to homosexuality but their gods were quite
> > fun and open minded.
>
> > I think we may as well dump Christianity and turn to the fun-seeking
> > Olympian Greek gods. Dionysus has a Spring festival dedicated to him
> > so we can go out and have some wine. "Hey --I'm talking to the gays--
> > do whatever, just don't bother me anymore with democracy and gay
> > issues."
>
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> >http://webspawner.com/users/BANANAREVOLUTION
>
> of animals...including horses and (recently discovered) penguins.
>
> I'd label you "stupid" but that doesn't do ya justice.
Hey, we are not an animal. Well, we are but we have a powerful brain
to behave in a civilized way. You may argue that incest is also common
in the animal world.
How about "threesomes"? Group sex is also found in the animal world...
God is fine with incest though since Cain must have "married" a
sister.
See all the possible contradictions?
His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher
Mar 30, 2013, 6:56:55 PM3/30/13
to
On Mar 30, 12:18 pm, "His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble
When we take clues from the animal kingdom we may learn that animals
do whatever they want, in many different ways, but there's hardly
homosexuality per se. The only animal that practices homosexuality is
the sheep. No religious connotations here. Rams ramming rams, so to
speak...
(I quote)
"Although homosexual behavior is very common in the animal world, it
seems to be very uncommon that individual animals have a long-lasting
predisposition to engage in such behavior to the exclusion of
heterosexual activities. Thus, a homosexual orientation, if one can
speak of such thing in animals, seems to be a rarity.[7] One species
in which exclusive homosexual orientation occurs, however, is that of
domesticated sheep (Ovis aries).[8][9] "About 10% of rams (males)
refuse to mate with ewes (females) but do readily mate with other
rams."[9]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexuality_in_the_animal_world
***
If I were to classify god's sexual tendencies, I would say he's a "he-
she," with both male and female organs. He couldn't be a "he" or a
"she" and understand the opposite sex.
do whatever they want, in many different ways, but there's hardly
homosexuality per se. The only animal that practices homosexuality is
the sheep. No religious connotations here. Rams ramming rams, so to
speak...
(I quote)
"Although homosexual behavior is very common in the animal world, it
seems to be very uncommon that individual animals have a long-lasting
predisposition to engage in such behavior to the exclusion of
heterosexual activities. Thus, a homosexual orientation, if one can
speak of such thing in animals, seems to be a rarity.[7] One species
in which exclusive homosexual orientation occurs, however, is that of
domesticated sheep (Ovis aries).[8][9] "About 10% of rams (males)
refuse to mate with ewes (females) but do readily mate with other
rams."[9]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexuality_in_the_animal_world
***
If I were to classify god's sexual tendencies, I would say he's a "he-
she," with both male and female organs. He couldn't be a "he" or a
"she" and understand the opposite sex.
linuxgal
Mar 30, 2013, 8:40:20 PM3/30/13
to
His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher wrote:
>
> If I were to classify god's sexual tendencies, I would say he's a "he-
> she," with both male and female organs. He couldn't be a "he" or a
> "she" and understand the opposite sex.
>
Well, aside from the fact that God doesn't exist, or if he did, would be
>
> If I were to classify god's sexual tendencies, I would say he's a "he-
> she," with both male and female organs. He couldn't be a "he" or a
> "she" and understand the opposite sex.
>
a spirit with no genitals, does he need a tail to understand monkeys?
--
Halftime at Circvs Maximvs, and the Lions lead the Christians 326-0
His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher
Mar 30, 2013, 8:12:17 PM3/30/13
to
On Mar 30, 7:42 pm, linuxgal <linux...@cleanposts.com> wrote:
> His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher wrote:
>
>
>
> > If I were to classify god's sexual tendencies, I would say he's a "he-
> > she," with both male and female organs. He couldn't be a "he" or a
> > "she" and understand the opposite sex.
>
> Well, aside from the fact that God doesn't exist, or if he did, would be
> a spirit with no genitals, does he need a tail to understand monkeys?
Sorry, we are made "in his image," so we can safely say he would have
> His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher wrote:
>
>
>
> > If I were to classify god's sexual tendencies, I would say he's a "he-
> > she," with both male and female organs. He couldn't be a "he" or a
> > "she" and understand the opposite sex.
>
> Well, aside from the fact that God doesn't exist, or if he did, would be
> a spirit with no genitals, does he need a tail to understand monkeys?
genitals if he existed.
Monkeys are made in human image, I'd imagine.
His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher
Mar 31, 2013, 12:23:27 PM3/31/13
to
On Mar 31, 10:17 am, Zero <z...@thebackofbeyond.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 22:52:49 -0500, x <x...@x.org> wrote:
> > god created humans in his image, though...so...oh fuck it who
>
> cares.....
>
> Oo ooo I have Vagina envy :-(
> I think they are quite neat :-)
>
> ;-)
How can the gay guys deny they are beautiful?
In the beginning there was a Big Vulva that gave birth to everything.
> On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 22:52:49 -0500, x <x...@x.org> wrote:
> > god created humans in his image, though...so...oh fuck it who
>
> cares.....
>
> Oo ooo I have Vagina envy :-(
> I think they are quite neat :-)
>
> ;-)
How can the gay guys deny they are beautiful?
In the beginning there was a Big Vulva that gave birth to everything.
Earle Jones
Mar 31, 2013, 1:56:48 PM3/31/13
to
In article
<2eaa3407-21fb-46c0...@v8g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>,
*
You've got it backwards:
"Man created God in his own image."
--Marvin 3:16
earle
*
<2eaa3407-21fb-46c0...@v8g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>,
"His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher"
You've got it backwards:
"Man created God in his own image."
--Marvin 3:16
earle
*
His Higness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher
Mar 31, 2013, 3:42:29 PM3/31/13
to
On Mar 31, 2:32 pm, Zero <z...@thebackofbeyond.com> wrote:
> On 31/03/13 18:46, x wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 17:52:46 +0100, Zero wrote:
>
> >> On 31/03/13 17:20, His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble
>
> >> hahahahahah !
>
> >> :D
>
> > that's settled then?
>
> > i'm not sure when we're covering up or unveiling..
>
> Maybe we should ask "The Gay Guys"
>
> (I am sure we would get numerous opinions)
>
> :D
>
> ERk, somehow I missed the beginning of this thread....
Who can deny the metaphorical "forbidden fruit"?
http://www.tocadacotia.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/10-propostas-loucas-de-perfume-para-seduzir-voce-vulva-original-.jpg
The sheep herders who wrote the Bible must have found it unnecessary
after coexisting with the sheep for so long.
> On 31/03/13 18:46, x wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 17:52:46 +0100, Zero wrote:
>
> >> On 31/03/13 17:20, His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble
> >> Philosopher wrote:
> >>> On Mar 31, 10:17 am, Zero <z...@thebackofbeyond.com> wrote:
> >>>> On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 22:52:49 -0500, x <x...@x.org> wrote:
>
> >>>>> god created humans in his image, though...so...oh fuck it who
>
> >>>> cares.....
>
> >>>> Oo ooo I have Vagina envy :-(
> >>>> I think they are quite neat :-)
>
> >>>> ;-)
>
> >>> How can the gay guys deny they are beautiful?
>
> >> The "Gay Gays" <ROFL> Is that a new boy band :D :D :D
> >>> On Mar 31, 10:17 am, Zero <z...@thebackofbeyond.com> wrote:
> >>>> On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 22:52:49 -0500, x <x...@x.org> wrote:
>
> >>>>> god created humans in his image, though...so...oh fuck it who
>
> >>>> cares.....
>
> >>>> Oo ooo I have Vagina envy :-(
> >>>> I think they are quite neat :-)
>
> >>>> ;-)
>
> >>> How can the gay guys deny they are beautiful?
>
>
> >>> In the beginning there was a Big Vulva that gave birth to everything.
> >>> No we all came forth from the universal female CUNT
> >>> In the beginning there was a Big Vulva that gave birth to everything.
>
> >> hahahahahah !
>
> >> :D
>
> > that's settled then?
>
> > i'm not sure when we're covering up or unveiling..
>
> Maybe we should ask "The Gay Guys"
>
> (I am sure we would get numerous opinions)
>
> :D
>
> ERk, somehow I missed the beginning of this thread....
Who can deny the metaphorical "forbidden fruit"?
http://www.tocadacotia.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/10-propostas-loucas-de-perfume-para-seduzir-voce-vulva-original-.jpg
The sheep herders who wrote the Bible must have found it unnecessary
after coexisting with the sheep for so long.
Vinegar
Mar 31, 2013, 5:17:22 PM3/31/13
to
On Mar 29, 11:36 am, "His Higness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble
who gave his holy Laws to Moses? Hmmmmm
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> http://webspawner.com/users/BANANAREVOLUTION
Philosopher" <thetibetanmon...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Such is clearly the case as he created a man and a woman, or so the
> story goes. If gays appeal to marriage, they better profess their
> atheistic or at least Pagan credentials. When they do so, I'll
> carefully study their case before I pronounce a verdict. The Greeks
> didn't have any objection to homosexuality but their gods were quite
> fun and open minded.
>
> I think we may as well dump Christianity and turn to the fun-seeking
> Olympian Greek gods. Dionysus has a Spring festival dedicated to him
> so we can go out and have some wine. "Hey --I'm talking to the gays--
> do whatever, just don't bother me anymore with democracy and gay
> issues."
If there is a God???? You are NOT even sure that there is a mighty God
> Such is clearly the case as he created a man and a woman, or so the
> story goes. If gays appeal to marriage, they better profess their
> atheistic or at least Pagan credentials. When they do so, I'll
> carefully study their case before I pronounce a verdict. The Greeks
> didn't have any objection to homosexuality but their gods were quite
> fun and open minded.
>
> I think we may as well dump Christianity and turn to the fun-seeking
> Olympian Greek gods. Dionysus has a Spring festival dedicated to him
> so we can go out and have some wine. "Hey --I'm talking to the gays--
> do whatever, just don't bother me anymore with democracy and gay
> issues."
who gave his holy Laws to Moses? Hmmmmm
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> http://webspawner.com/users/BANANAREVOLUTION
His Higness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher
Apr 1, 2013, 6:01:25 PM4/1/13
to
On Mar 31, 5:17 pm, Vinegar <kolwe...@astromail.com> wrote:
> On Mar 29, 11:36 am, "His Higness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble
>
> Philosopher" <thetibetanmon...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Such is clearly the case as he created a man and a woman, or so the
> > story goes. If gays appeal to marriage, they better profess their
> > atheistic or at least Pagan credentials. When they do so, I'll
> > carefully study their case before I pronounce a verdict. The Greeks
> > didn't have any objection to homosexuality but their gods were quite
> > fun and open minded.
>
> > I think we may as well dump Christianity and turn to the fun-seeking
> > Olympian Greek gods. Dionysus has a Spring festival dedicated to him
> > so we can go out and have some wine. "Hey --I'm talking to the gays--
> > do whatever, just don't bother me anymore with democracy and gay
> > issues."
>
> If there is a God???? You are NOT even sure that there is a mighty God
> who gave his holy Laws to Moses? Hmmmmm
I don't know, Moses may have been inclined to smoking weed or magical
> On Mar 29, 11:36 am, "His Higness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble
>
> Philosopher" <thetibetanmon...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Such is clearly the case as he created a man and a woman, or so the
> > story goes. If gays appeal to marriage, they better profess their
> > atheistic or at least Pagan credentials. When they do so, I'll
> > carefully study their case before I pronounce a verdict. The Greeks
> > didn't have any objection to homosexuality but their gods were quite
> > fun and open minded.
>
> > I think we may as well dump Christianity and turn to the fun-seeking
> > Olympian Greek gods. Dionysus has a Spring festival dedicated to him
> > so we can go out and have some wine. "Hey --I'm talking to the gays--
> > do whatever, just don't bother me anymore with democracy and gay
> > issues."
>
> If there is a God???? You are NOT even sure that there is a mighty God
> who gave his holy Laws to Moses? Hmmmmm
mushrooms.
Is there any deed of such real estate transaction???
His Higness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher
Apr 1, 2013, 6:08:01 PM4/1/13
to
On Mar 31, 4:45 pm, "Chris Tolles: Evil Scumbag"
<jls1...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> Hey, whacko, your premises are irrational. If there is a god and
> this god made people and he made some of them gay, then why would this
> god discriminate against the gay people and not let any of them get
> married to each other?
>
> You're about as dumb an ox as any I have seen here, and I have seen a
> blue million of them.
Hey, what kind of irrational rationale is that. God created men and
some of them turned corrupt politicians, terrorists and child
molesters...
What kind of rationale is that?
<jls1...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> Hey, whacko, your premises are irrational. If there is a god and
> this god made people and he made some of them gay, then why would this
> god discriminate against the gay people and not let any of them get
> married to each other?
>
> You're about as dumb an ox as any I have seen here, and I have seen a
> blue million of them.
Hey, what kind of irrational rationale is that. God created men and
some of them turned corrupt politicians, terrorists and child
molesters...
What kind of rationale is that?
Father Haskell
Apr 1, 2013, 7:09:46 PM4/1/13
to
On Mar 31, 5:17 pm, Vinegar <kolwe...@astromail.com> wrote:
> On Mar 29, 11:36 am, "His Higness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble
>
> Philosopher" <thetibetanmon...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Such is clearly the case as he created a man and a woman, or so the
> > story goes. If gays appeal to marriage, they better profess their
> > atheistic or at least Pagan credentials. When they do so, I'll
> > carefully study their case before I pronounce a verdict. The Greeks
> > didn't have any objection to homosexuality but their gods were quite
> > fun and open minded.
>
> > I think we may as well dump Christianity and turn to the fun-seeking
> > Olympian Greek gods. Dionysus has a Spring festival dedicated to him
> > so we can go out and have some wine. "Hey --I'm talking to the gays--
> > do whatever, just don't bother me anymore with democracy and gay
> > issues."
>
> If there is a God???? You are NOT even sure that there is a mighty God
> who gave his holy Laws to Moses? Hmmmmm
Yup. The OT is bullshit, too.
>
> Philosopher" <thetibetanmon...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Such is clearly the case as he created a man and a woman, or so the
> > story goes. If gays appeal to marriage, they better profess their
> > atheistic or at least Pagan credentials. When they do so, I'll
> > carefully study their case before I pronounce a verdict. The Greeks
> > didn't have any objection to homosexuality but their gods were quite
> > fun and open minded.
>
> > I think we may as well dump Christianity and turn to the fun-seeking
> > Olympian Greek gods. Dionysus has a Spring festival dedicated to him
> > so we can go out and have some wine. "Hey --I'm talking to the gays--
> > do whatever, just don't bother me anymore with democracy and gay
> > issues."
>
> If there is a God???? You are NOT even sure that there is a mighty God
> who gave his holy Laws to Moses? Hmmmmm
His Higness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher
Apr 1, 2013, 7:13:12 PM4/1/13
to
His Higness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher
Apr 2, 2013, 10:47:49 AM4/2/13
to
On Mar 31, 12:20 pm, "His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble
have to question God's design. The "pleasure button" should have been
located more prominently outside. I say it's hard to locate sometimes.
Of course, I don't expect God to have tested his own design, so he is
excused from a perfect design.
How about the two teats? Women hardly ever have twins...
Is that an invitation to a threesome?
Philosopher" <comandante.ban...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Mar 31, 10:17 am, Zero <z...@thebackofbeyond.com> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 22:52:49 -0500, x <x...@x.org> wrote:
> > > god created humans in his image, though...so...oh fuck it who
>
> > cares.....
>
> > Oo ooo I have Vagina envy :-(
> > I think they are quite neat :-)
>
> > ;-)
>
> How can the gay guys deny they are beautiful?
>
> On Mar 31, 10:17 am, Zero <z...@thebackofbeyond.com> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 22:52:49 -0500, x <x...@x.org> wrote:
> > > god created humans in his image, though...so...oh fuck it who
>
> > cares.....
>
> > Oo ooo I have Vagina envy :-(
> > I think they are quite neat :-)
>
> > ;-)
>
> How can the gay guys deny they are beautiful?
>
> In the beginning there was a Big Vulva that gave birth to everything.
Having said the vulva is beautiful (a fact denied by gay guys) I'd
have to question God's design. The "pleasure button" should have been
located more prominently outside. I say it's hard to locate sometimes.
Of course, I don't expect God to have tested his own design, so he is
excused from a perfect design.
How about the two teats? Women hardly ever have twins...
Is that an invitation to a threesome?
linuxgal
Apr 3, 2013, 12:48:28 AM4/3/13
to
His Higness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher wrote:
> Having said the vulva is beautiful (a fact denied by gay guys) I'd
> have to question God's design. The "pleasure button" should have been
> located more prominently outside. I say it's hard to locate sometimes.
Then it would get all beat to shit and desensitized. Sort of like what
> Having said the vulva is beautiful (a fact denied by gay guys) I'd
> have to question God's design. The "pleasure button" should have been
> located more prominently outside. I say it's hard to locate sometimes.
happens to circumcised men.
His Higness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher
Apr 3, 2013, 4:15:51 PM4/3/13
to
I think I'm circumcised (I never worry about those issues), but I'm
far from desensitized!
His Higness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher
Apr 3, 2013, 4:27:58 PM4/3/13
to
On Apr 3, 7:29 am, Zero <z...@thebackofbeyond.com> wrote:
> On 02/04/13 15:46, His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble
> and check their concordance on this point :-/
>
> Anyhow even a lot of women don't like their own body parts and thus have
> them surgically modified which is a tragedy imo - viva la difference imo
> - Thank Christ <chuckle> different folks go for different things - I am
> sure that even "Gay Guys" (GOOD GRIEF!) have different
> tastes/preferences.....
It's like the Easter egg?
Well, many women go without fun in their lives.
And they must thank God for that.
Wait a minute, I'm serious. God must have tested his design somehow to
know it works.
How about if the pleasure button turned out to produce pain?
How about the relationship between pain and pleasure, aka sado-
masochism?
>
>
>
> > How about the two teats? Women hardly ever have twins...
>
> > Is that an invitation to a threesome?
>
> Well you can share your fantasies right here if you want too :-)
The one about two girls? Who doesn't have that one. Even the Pope must
have thought about it.
> On 02/04/13 15:46, His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Philosopher wrote:
> > On Mar 31, 12:20 pm, "His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble
> > Philosopher" <comandante.ban...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> On Mar 31, 10:17 am, Zero <z...@thebackofbeyond.com> wrote:
>
> >>> On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 22:52:49 -0500, x <x...@x.org> wrote:
> >>>> god created humans in his image, though...so...oh fuck it who
>
> >>> cares.....
>
> >>> Oo ooo I have Vagina envy :-(
> >>> I think they are quite neat :-)
>
> >>> ;-)
>
> >> How can the gay guys deny they are beautiful?
>
> >> In the beginning there was a Big Vulva that gave birth to everything.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Philosopher wrote:
> > On Mar 31, 12:20 pm, "His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble
> > Philosopher" <comandante.ban...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> On Mar 31, 10:17 am, Zero <z...@thebackofbeyond.com> wrote:
>
> >>> On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 22:52:49 -0500, x <x...@x.org> wrote:
> >>>> god created humans in his image, though...so...oh fuck it who
>
> >>> cares.....
>
> >>> Oo ooo I have Vagina envy :-(
> >>> I think they are quite neat :-)
>
> >>> ;-)
>
> >> How can the gay guys deny they are beautiful?
>
> >> In the beginning there was a Big Vulva that gave birth to everything.
>
> > Having said the vulva is beautiful (a fact denied by gay guys)
>
> Arrghhhh ! Who are these "Gay Guys" - I would like to meet all of them
>
> and check their concordance on this point :-/
>
> Anyhow even a lot of women don't like their own body parts and thus have
> them surgically modified which is a tragedy imo - viva la difference imo
> - Thank Christ <chuckle> different folks go for different things - I am
> sure that even "Gay Guys" (GOOD GRIEF!) have different
> tastes/preferences.....
>
> > I'd
> > have to question God's design. The "pleasure button" should have been
> > located more prominently outside. I say it's hard to locate sometimes.
>
> Isn't that part of the fun?:D
> > I'd
> > have to question God's design. The "pleasure button" should have been
> > located more prominently outside. I say it's hard to locate sometimes.
>
It's like the Easter egg?
Well, many women go without fun in their lives.
And they must thank God for that.
>
>
>
> > Of course, I don't expect God to have tested his own design, so he is
> > excused from a perfect design.
>
> You are just being silly now :-)
>
>
> > Of course, I don't expect God to have tested his own design, so he is
> > excused from a perfect design.
>
Wait a minute, I'm serious. God must have tested his design somehow to
know it works.
How about if the pleasure button turned out to produce pain?
How about the relationship between pain and pleasure, aka sado-
masochism?
>
>
>
> > How about the two teats? Women hardly ever have twins...
>
> > Is that an invitation to a threesome?
>
The one about two girls? Who doesn't have that one. Even the Pope must
have thought about it.
His Higness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher
Apr 3, 2013, 4:45:25 PM4/3/13
to
On Apr 3, 7:29 am, Zero <z...@thebackofbeyond.com> wrote:
> On 02/04/13 15:46, His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Philosopher wrote:
> > On Mar 31, 12:20 pm, "His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble
> > Philosopher" <comandante.ban...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> On Mar 31, 10:17 am, Zero <z...@thebackofbeyond.com> wrote:
>
> >>> On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 22:52:49 -0500, x <x...@x.org> wrote:
> >>>> god created humans in his image, though...so...oh fuck it who
>
> >>> cares.....
>
> >>> Oo ooo I have Vagina envy :-(
> >>> I think they are quite neat :-)
>
> >>> ;-)
>
> >> How can the gay guys deny they are beautiful?
>
> >> In the beginning there was a Big Vulva that gave birth to everything.
>
> > Having said the vulva is beautiful (a fact denied by gay guys)
>
> Arrghhhh ! Who are these "Gay Guys" - I would like to meet all of them
> and check their concordance on this point :-/
"What Gay Guys Think About Vaginas"
> On 02/04/13 15:46, His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Philosopher wrote:
> > On Mar 31, 12:20 pm, "His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble
> > Philosopher" <comandante.ban...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> On Mar 31, 10:17 am, Zero <z...@thebackofbeyond.com> wrote:
>
> >>> On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 22:52:49 -0500, x <x...@x.org> wrote:
> >>>> god created humans in his image, though...so...oh fuck it who
>
> >>> cares.....
>
> >>> Oo ooo I have Vagina envy :-(
> >>> I think they are quite neat :-)
>
> >>> ;-)
>
> >> How can the gay guys deny they are beautiful?
>
> >> In the beginning there was a Big Vulva that gave birth to everything.
>
> > Having said the vulva is beautiful (a fact denied by gay guys)
>
> Arrghhhh ! Who are these "Gay Guys" - I would like to meet all of them
> and check their concordance on this point :-/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bd3gw3caSEk
linuxgal
Apr 3, 2013, 10:24:35 PM4/3/13
to
two minutes.
Mitchell Holman
Apr 3, 2013, 10:04:25 PM4/3/13
to
linuxgal <linu...@cleanposts.com> wrote in news:h-
2dnaRPmdIVS8HMn...@giganews.com:
No man has ever been accused of faking an orgasm.
Nor have any insisted on the use of a mechanical
appliance in getting one.
2dnaRPmdIVS8HMn...@giganews.com:
Nor have any insisted on the use of a mechanical
appliance in getting one.
His Higness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher
Apr 5, 2013, 12:39:31 PM4/5/13
to
His Higness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher
Apr 5, 2013, 12:39:53 PM4/5/13
to
On Apr 4, 12:39 pm, Tim <8.tim.har...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 4 Apr, 09:09, Zero <z...@thebackofbeyond.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > My GOD
>
> > Does G-Spot really stand for "GOD-SPOT" :D
>
> > ?
>
> hit it and know.
>
> that is what my ex gave up chasing her dream... the big O... every
> time... twice a day... sensusal, sexy, sexual, deviant and...
> explosive... multiples... the tantra, which obviously everyone knows
> so much about... the words... hahaha... is simple... longevity... that
> is what i really means monkey... a three day fuck fest begins... but
> you know this and i am trying to cover things that you do not know...
> the first orgasm is purely mental... the second, a matter of
> masterbation highened by a sense of voyeurism... the third? get that
> first fuck out of the way... and then... wow. that is the first night
> monkey... two more to fill in which exceed physical and snakes its way
> into spiritual copulation... then the thrid day it is purely mental
> again... like a hard pinch creating a bruise that will force her to
> crunge in pangs of pain... while at work... and the correspondence was
> last weekend... when i used that energy to kill... succubus or is it
> incubus... i really need to know... because...
>
> the word God however, is like M in M theory... but if you know how to
> do it to her, to hit that spot... she will be a fool to let you go
> since everytime, twice a day, earth shaking and shattering orgasms...
> or under box number two... but you will have to talk to jacquie about
> that...
>
> the tantra here then becomes the ability so separate consciousness
> from the shiva force and the shakti field then objectively transmute
> them into a pure mental orasm which becomes the character in the dream
> that.... and it manifests in the rose.
>
> here is the formula... IHVH... the formula of the tetragrammaton...
> blah and blah make blah... but then there is the daughter... the...
> when i say red you think... <is the daughter>... you must get into the
> higher states by first face, purging, destroying your own obstacles of
> karma... thus, when a Devil of Light comes along, on the very, very,
> extremely rare chance you should meet one, when he says : truth...
> which penetrates the veil, kills the ignorance... and releases the
> daughter of err through the mechanism of action... action to action...
> i become your world... so in effect, since this media is so open to
> perception, state and translation... it really was the best place to
> get it started...
>
> but in real life... face to face... my power in your shakti bitch...
>
> now, please, things are getting testy... i have already located a few
> fringe gamers on the edge of real satanic exploration... they simply
> need a guide connie and jenna... the work is already done... it, and
> you, are already set up... i am told that the Catholics, as well as
> just simple common reason, suggests that to willfully commit suicide
> is a grave, grave sin of which even the church can not save you...
>
> ... there is the trigger you Jew whores... you need only die once to
> see what i can see... which unites with what i have shared with you
> before in your first life... creating... and executing...
>
> what.
>
> Lucifer
I really like what you say sometimes, but usually I get bored after
the first paragraph and then I try to look for key words. As usual the
word "Jew" pops up in your comments. Is there a sexual fantasy to it?
Something like a Jewish woman removing her wig and going wild like a
monkey?
I really stopped going wild in a howling or athletic way. Now it's
just nice soft Tantra --the TibetanMonkey way. It's a crescendo with
hands free to explore those spots so well hidden by God. It's the
monkey way as well. The "missionary position" is out, meaning I have
developed my own style.
I may as well have unleashed the energy of the Universe, same energy
only God is thought to posses. God as engineer seems to be as smart as
the engineers who design bike lanes that don't connect. In other
words, he's an idiot. I mean the dots are not connected and then a
clever monkey comes along...
> On 4 Apr, 09:09, Zero <z...@thebackofbeyond.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > My GOD
>
> > Does G-Spot really stand for "GOD-SPOT" :D
>
> > ?
>
> hit it and know.
>
> that is what my ex gave up chasing her dream... the big O... every
> time... twice a day... sensusal, sexy, sexual, deviant and...
> explosive... multiples... the tantra, which obviously everyone knows
> so much about... the words... hahaha... is simple... longevity... that
> is what i really means monkey... a three day fuck fest begins... but
> you know this and i am trying to cover things that you do not know...
> the first orgasm is purely mental... the second, a matter of
> masterbation highened by a sense of voyeurism... the third? get that
> first fuck out of the way... and then... wow. that is the first night
> monkey... two more to fill in which exceed physical and snakes its way
> into spiritual copulation... then the thrid day it is purely mental
> again... like a hard pinch creating a bruise that will force her to
> crunge in pangs of pain... while at work... and the correspondence was
> last weekend... when i used that energy to kill... succubus or is it
> incubus... i really need to know... because...
>
> the word God however, is like M in M theory... but if you know how to
> do it to her, to hit that spot... she will be a fool to let you go
> since everytime, twice a day, earth shaking and shattering orgasms...
> or under box number two... but you will have to talk to jacquie about
> that...
>
> the tantra here then becomes the ability so separate consciousness
> from the shiva force and the shakti field then objectively transmute
> them into a pure mental orasm which becomes the character in the dream
> that.... and it manifests in the rose.
>
> here is the formula... IHVH... the formula of the tetragrammaton...
> blah and blah make blah... but then there is the daughter... the...
> when i say red you think... <is the daughter>... you must get into the
> higher states by first face, purging, destroying your own obstacles of
> karma... thus, when a Devil of Light comes along, on the very, very,
> extremely rare chance you should meet one, when he says : truth...
> which penetrates the veil, kills the ignorance... and releases the
> daughter of err through the mechanism of action... action to action...
> i become your world... so in effect, since this media is so open to
> perception, state and translation... it really was the best place to
> get it started...
>
> but in real life... face to face... my power in your shakti bitch...
>
> now, please, things are getting testy... i have already located a few
> fringe gamers on the edge of real satanic exploration... they simply
> need a guide connie and jenna... the work is already done... it, and
> you, are already set up... i am told that the Catholics, as well as
> just simple common reason, suggests that to willfully commit suicide
> is a grave, grave sin of which even the church can not save you...
>
> ... there is the trigger you Jew whores... you need only die once to
> see what i can see... which unites with what i have shared with you
> before in your first life... creating... and executing...
>
> what.
>
> Lucifer
I really like what you say sometimes, but usually I get bored after
the first paragraph and then I try to look for key words. As usual the
word "Jew" pops up in your comments. Is there a sexual fantasy to it?
Something like a Jewish woman removing her wig and going wild like a
monkey?
I really stopped going wild in a howling or athletic way. Now it's
just nice soft Tantra --the TibetanMonkey way. It's a crescendo with
hands free to explore those spots so well hidden by God. It's the
monkey way as well. The "missionary position" is out, meaning I have
developed my own style.
I may as well have unleashed the energy of the Universe, same energy
only God is thought to posses. God as engineer seems to be as smart as
the engineers who design bike lanes that don't connect. In other
words, he's an idiot. I mean the dots are not connected and then a
clever monkey comes along...
His Higness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher
Apr 5, 2013, 2:00:53 PM4/5/13
to
On Apr 5, 12:51 pm, Wet Paper Bag <ultimate.henchman....@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On 5 Apr, 10:37, "His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble
>
> Philosopher" <thetibetanmon...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> hahaha... hey monkey.. i rarely get passed your subject... and only
> read to laugh at you because that is what monkeys are good for..
> entertaining me...
>
> Lucifer
Thank you. Actually my subjects are all you need to know. They become
mottoes for the revolution.
This one is particularly important: God doesn't care about gays, women
or anything. Now we are free to do what we want.
wrote:
> On 5 Apr, 10:37, "His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble
>
> Philosopher" <thetibetanmon...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> hahaha... hey monkey.. i rarely get passed your subject... and only
> read to laugh at you because that is what monkeys are good for..
> entertaining me...
>
> Lucifer
Thank you. Actually my subjects are all you need to know. They become
mottoes for the revolution.
This one is particularly important: God doesn't care about gays, women
or anything. Now we are free to do what we want.
Earle Jones
Apr 5, 2013, 2:40:16 PM4/5/13
to
In article
<b63ac943-e0d8-43f1...@q6g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>,
No. It actually stands for Graefenberg, (from the German gynecologist
Ernst Gr�fenberg, the physician who dreamed it up.)
earle
*
See Wikipedia:
"G-Spot proponents are criticized for giving too much credence to
anecdotal evidence, and for questionable investigative methods; for
instance, the studies which have yielded positive evidence for a
precisely located G-Spot involve small participant samples. Scientific
examinations of vaginal wall innervation have generally shown that there
is no single area with a greater density of nerve endings. A 2006 study
of 110 biopsy specimens drawn from 21 women concluded with the absence
of a vaginal locus with greater nerve density. Several researchers also
consider the connection between the Skene's gland and the G-Spot to be
weak. They contend that the Skene's gland does not appear to have
receptors for touch stimulation, and that there is no direct evidence
for its involvement. However, while neither the area of the anterior
vaginal wall where the G-Spot is said to be located nor the Skene's
gland appear to possess great nerve density, the urethral sponge, which
is thought by some to be homologous to the G-Spot, does contain
sensitive nerve endings and erectile tissue. Additionally, sensitivity
is not determined by neuron density alone: other factors include the
branching patterns of neuron terminals and cross or collateral
innervation of neurons."
<b63ac943-e0d8-43f1...@q6g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>,
"His Higness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher"
<thetibet...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Apr 4, 12:39 pm, Tim <8.tim.har...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 4 Apr, 09:09, Zero <z...@thebackofbeyond.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > My GOD
> >
> > > Does G-Spot really stand for "GOD-SPOT" :D
*
> On Apr 4, 12:39 pm, Tim <8.tim.har...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 4 Apr, 09:09, Zero <z...@thebackofbeyond.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > My GOD
> >
> > > Does G-Spot really stand for "GOD-SPOT" :D
No. It actually stands for Graefenberg, (from the German gynecologist
Ernst Gr�fenberg, the physician who dreamed it up.)
earle
*
See Wikipedia:
"G-Spot proponents are criticized for giving too much credence to
anecdotal evidence, and for questionable investigative methods; for
instance, the studies which have yielded positive evidence for a
precisely located G-Spot involve small participant samples. Scientific
examinations of vaginal wall innervation have generally shown that there
is no single area with a greater density of nerve endings. A 2006 study
of 110 biopsy specimens drawn from 21 women concluded with the absence
of a vaginal locus with greater nerve density. Several researchers also
consider the connection between the Skene's gland and the G-Spot to be
weak. They contend that the Skene's gland does not appear to have
receptors for touch stimulation, and that there is no direct evidence
for its involvement. However, while neither the area of the anterior
vaginal wall where the G-Spot is said to be located nor the Skene's
gland appear to possess great nerve density, the urethral sponge, which
is thought by some to be homologous to the G-Spot, does contain
sensitive nerve endings and erectile tissue. Additionally, sensitivity
is not determined by neuron density alone: other factors include the
branching patterns of neuron terminals and cross or collateral
innervation of neurons."
His Higness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher
Apr 5, 2013, 3:44:17 PM4/5/13
to
On Apr 5, 2:40 pm, Earle Jones <earle.jo...@comcast.net> wrote:
> In article
> <b63ac943-e0d8-43f1-9d5f-6c43dfb45...@q6g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>,
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/9026947/Female-G-spot-may-not-exist.html
I don't look for it anymore. Another distraction from reality. Women
want men that act like a monkey, but not in the howling sense. They
want hand action, sensitive hands that only a monkey possesses.
"monkeys, and especially apes, resemble us most closely in the hand
and arm..."
http://people.wku.edu/charles.smith/wallace/S350.htm
***
God may have made a clumsy job by hiding the "pleasure button," but it
takes a curious monkey to find it.
> In article
> <b63ac943-e0d8-43f1-9d5f-6c43dfb45...@q6g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>,
> "His Higness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher"
>
>
> <thetibetanmon...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Apr 4, 12:39 pm, Tim <8.tim.har...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On 4 Apr, 09:09, Zero <z...@thebackofbeyond.com> wrote:
>
> > > > My GOD
>
> > > > Does G-Spot really stand for "GOD-SPOT" :D
>
> *
> No. It actually stands for Graefenberg, (from the German gynecologist
> Ernst Gräfenberg, the physician who dreamed it up.)
> > On Apr 4, 12:39 pm, Tim <8.tim.har...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On 4 Apr, 09:09, Zero <z...@thebackofbeyond.com> wrote:
>
> > > > My GOD
>
> > > > Does G-Spot really stand for "GOD-SPOT" :D
>
> *
> No. It actually stands for Graefenberg, (from the German gynecologist
>
> earle
> *
>
> See Wikipedia:
>
> "G-Spot proponents are criticized for giving too much credence to
> anecdotal evidence, and for questionable investigative methods; for
> instance, the studies which have yielded positive evidence for a
> precisely located G-Spot involve small participant samples. Scientific
> examinations of vaginal wall innervation have generally shown that there
> is no single area with a greater density of nerve endings. A 2006 study
> of 110 biopsy specimens drawn from 21 women concluded with the absence
> of a vaginal locus with greater nerve density. Several researchers also
> consider the connection between the Skene's gland and the G-Spot to be
> weak. They contend that the Skene's gland does not appear to have
> receptors for touch stimulation, and that there is no direct evidence
> for its involvement. However, while neither the area of the anterior
> vaginal wall where the G-Spot is said to be located nor the Skene's
> gland appear to possess great nerve density, the urethral sponge, which
> is thought by some to be homologous to the G-Spot, does contain
> sensitive nerve endings and erectile tissue. Additionally, sensitivity
> is not determined by neuron density alone: other factors include the
> branching patterns of neuron terminals and cross or collateral
> innervation of neurons."
It may argued though that the g-spot is as imaginary as God...
> earle
> *
>
> See Wikipedia:
>
> "G-Spot proponents are criticized for giving too much credence to
> anecdotal evidence, and for questionable investigative methods; for
> instance, the studies which have yielded positive evidence for a
> precisely located G-Spot involve small participant samples. Scientific
> examinations of vaginal wall innervation have generally shown that there
> is no single area with a greater density of nerve endings. A 2006 study
> of 110 biopsy specimens drawn from 21 women concluded with the absence
> of a vaginal locus with greater nerve density. Several researchers also
> consider the connection between the Skene's gland and the G-Spot to be
> weak. They contend that the Skene's gland does not appear to have
> receptors for touch stimulation, and that there is no direct evidence
> for its involvement. However, while neither the area of the anterior
> vaginal wall where the G-Spot is said to be located nor the Skene's
> gland appear to possess great nerve density, the urethral sponge, which
> is thought by some to be homologous to the G-Spot, does contain
> sensitive nerve endings and erectile tissue. Additionally, sensitivity
> is not determined by neuron density alone: other factors include the
> branching patterns of neuron terminals and cross or collateral
> innervation of neurons."
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/9026947/Female-G-spot-may-not-exist.html
I don't look for it anymore. Another distraction from reality. Women
want men that act like a monkey, but not in the howling sense. They
want hand action, sensitive hands that only a monkey possesses.
"monkeys, and especially apes, resemble us most closely in the hand
and arm..."
http://people.wku.edu/charles.smith/wallace/S350.htm
***
God may have made a clumsy job by hiding the "pleasure button," but it
takes a curious monkey to find it.
linuxgal
Apr 5, 2013, 9:07:51 PM4/5/13
to
Earle Jones wrote:
> "G-Spot proponents are criticized for giving too much credence to
> anecdotal evidence, and for questionable investigative methods; for
> instance, the studies which have yielded positive evidence for a
> precisely located G-Spot involve small participant samples. Scientific
> examinations of vaginal wall innervation have generally shown that there
> is no single area with a greater density of nerve endings. A 2006 study
> of 110 biopsy specimens drawn from 21 women concluded with the absence
> of a vaginal locus with greater nerve density. Several researchers also
> consider the connection between the Skene's gland and the G-Spot to be
> weak. They contend that the Skene's gland does not appear to have
> receptors for touch stimulation, and that there is no direct evidence
> for its involvement. However, while neither the area of the anterior
> vaginal wall where the G-Spot is said to be located nor the Skene's
> gland appear to possess great nerve density, the urethral sponge, which
> is thought by some to be homologous to the G-Spot, does contain
> sensitive nerve endings and erectile tissue. Additionally, sensitivity
> is not determined by neuron density alone: other factors include the
> branching patterns of neuron terminals and cross or collateral
> innervation of neurons."
I love it when you talk that way to me. Now I gotta find the nearest
> "G-Spot proponents are criticized for giving too much credence to
> anecdotal evidence, and for questionable investigative methods; for
> instance, the studies which have yielded positive evidence for a
> precisely located G-Spot involve small participant samples. Scientific
> examinations of vaginal wall innervation have generally shown that there
> is no single area with a greater density of nerve endings. A 2006 study
> of 110 biopsy specimens drawn from 21 women concluded with the absence
> of a vaginal locus with greater nerve density. Several researchers also
> consider the connection between the Skene's gland and the G-Spot to be
> weak. They contend that the Skene's gland does not appear to have
> receptors for touch stimulation, and that there is no direct evidence
> for its involvement. However, while neither the area of the anterior
> vaginal wall where the G-Spot is said to be located nor the Skene's
> gland appear to possess great nerve density, the urethral sponge, which
> is thought by some to be homologous to the G-Spot, does contain
> sensitive nerve endings and erectile tissue. Additionally, sensitivity
> is not determined by neuron density alone: other factors include the
> branching patterns of neuron terminals and cross or collateral
> innervation of neurons."
pillow.
His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher
Apr 6, 2013, 9:25:00 AM4/6/13
to
linuxgal
May 19, 2013, 9:53:57 AM5/19/13
to
Earle Jones wrote:
> In article
> <b63ac943-e0d8-43f1...@q6g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>,
> "His Higness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher"
> <thetibet...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> >On Apr 4, 12:39 pm, Tim<8.tim.har...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > >On 4 Apr, 09:09, Zero<z...@thebackofbeyond.com> wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>>> > > >My GOD
>>> > >
>>>> > > >Does G-Spot really stand for "GOD-SPOT" :D
> *
> No. It actually stands for Graefenberg, (from the German gynecologist
> Ernst Gräfenberg, the physician who dreamed it up.)
> In article
> <b63ac943-e0d8-43f1...@q6g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>,
> "His Higness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher"
> <thetibet...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> >On Apr 4, 12:39 pm, Tim<8.tim.har...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > >On 4 Apr, 09:09, Zero<z...@thebackofbeyond.com> wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>>> > > >My GOD
>>> > >
>>>> > > >Does G-Spot really stand for "GOD-SPOT" :D
> *
> No. It actually stands for Graefenberg, (from the German gynecologist
The Amazing Randi will shell out a million dollars to the first woman
who successfully demonstrates the existence of her G-Spot, subject to
repeated observations for verification.
linuxgal
May 19, 2013, 10:17:09 AM5/19/13
to
His Higness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher wrote:
> I don't look for it anymore. Another distraction from reality. Women
> want men that act like a monkey, but not in the howling sense. They
> want hand action, sensitive hands that only a monkey possesses.
A monkey, or maybe also a union sheetrocker who can bend some 5/8"
> I don't look for it anymore. Another distraction from reality. Women
> want men that act like a monkey, but not in the howling sense. They
> want hand action, sensitive hands that only a monkey possesses.
drywall inside the corner of a Best Buy interior without cracking it.
0 new messages