Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: Of atheists and Xtians, The evolution of Prophet Dawkin's Gods and and bears that talk! B^D

0 views
Skip to first unread message

fasgnadh

unread,
Jan 28, 2012, 4:25:26 AM1/28/12
to
Witziges Rätsel wrote:
> On 25/01/2012 8:11 AM, mr_antone wrote:
>> An Atheist in the Woods
>>
>> (skip)

not everyone is as dour and humourless as atheists

<unsnip the joke>

>> An atheist was walking through the woods.
>> "What majestic trees!"
>> "What powerful rivers!"
>> "What beautiful animals!"
>> He said to himself.
>>
>> As he was walking alongside the river, he heard a rustling in the
>> bushes behind him.
>>
>> He turned to look. He saw a 7-foot grizzly bear charge towards him.
>>
>> He ran as fast as he could up the path. He looked over his shoulder&
>> saw that the bear was closing in on him.
>>
>> He looked over his shoulder again,& the bear was even closer.
>>
>> He tripped& fell on the ground.
>>
>> He rolled over to pick himself up but saw that the bear was right on
>> top of him, reaching for him with his left paw& raising his right paw
>> to strike him.
>>
>> At that instant the Atheist cried out, "Oh my God!"
>>
>> Time Stopped.
>> The bear froze.
>> The forest was silent.
>>
>> As a bright light shone upon the man, a voice came out of the sky.
>>
>> "You deny my existence for all these years, teach others I don't exist
>> and even credit creation to cosmic accident."
>> "Do you expect me to help you out of this predicament?"
>>
>> "Am I to count you as a believer?"
>>
>> The atheist looked directly into the light, "Oh, no, but perhaps
>> you could make the BEAR a Christian."
>>
>> "Very Well," said the voice.
>>
>> The light went out. The sounds of the forest resumed. And the bear
>> dropped his right paw, brought both paws together, bowed his head&
>> spoke:
>>
>> 'Lord bless this food, which I am about to receive from thy bounty
>> through Christ our Lord, Amen.'
>
> Do all Christians think that bears can speak?


Are all atheists humourless trolls? CLearly you take ATHEIST JOKES
far more seriously: B^D

Ex- Atheist, now Prophet, Richard Dawkins claims a "superpowerful
intelligent and moral energy" entity, "like God", is plausible and
could have 'evolved' somewhere in the Universe "by an explicable
scientific progression of incremental evolution", (which no
atheist can explain). B^D

Compared to that, talking bears is a trivial change!

BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAAA

# "After two hours of conversation, Professor Dawkins walks far afield.
# He talks of the possibility that we might co-evolve with computers, a
# silicon destiny. And he’s intrigued by the playful, even soul-stirring
# writings of Freeman Dyson, the theoretical physicist.
#
# 'In one essay, Professor Dyson casts millions of speculative years
# into the future. Our galaxy is dying and humans have evolved into
# something like bolts of superpowerful intelligent and moral energy.
#
# Doesn’t that description sound an awful lot like God?
#
# "Certainly," Professor Dawkins replies. "It’s highly plausible that
# in the universe there are God-like creatures."
#
# He raises his hand, just in case a reader thinks he’s gone around a
# religious bend. "It’s very important to understand that these Gods
# came into being by an explicable scientific progression of
# incremental evolution."'
#
# Could they be immortal? The professor shrugs.
#
# “Probably not.” He smiles and adds, “But I
# wouldn’t want to be too dogmatic about that.”"


http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/20/science/20dawkins.html?pagewanted=all



Your Prophet Dawkins claims "bolts of superpowerful intelligent and
moral energy", like God, exist, and that they evolved.

then Talking Bears can evolve in the exactly the same way.

Of course, Atheists claim God does not exist, but bears do,
for them to speak is a much smaller evolutionary step, compared to
atheist God's evolving out of Dawkins arse after breeding himself.

Dawkins said such things are explicable, go ask him for the explanation.

"Certainly," Professor Dawkins replies. "It’s highly plausible that
in the universe there are God-like creatures."

If atheists believe "These Gods came into being.." in the manner
Prophet Dawkins claims, but no one can prove ,
then "It’s very important to understand that these talking bears
came into being by an explicable scientific progression of
incremental evolution."

Uh Huh! B^D



So, which atheist is going to explain the inexplicable,
unscientific, BELIEF in "these {atheist] Gods", with no proof
whatsoever, and show us the evidence of how, and where, God evolved?

...........................................................

...........................................................

...........................................................


---------

alt.atheism FAQ:

http://altatheismfaq.blogspot.com/


http://groups.google.com.au/group/alt.atheism/msg/7c0978c14fd4ed37?hl=en&dmode=source



"Atheism is the natural and inseparable part of Communism."
-Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)

"We must combat religion"
-Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)

“Down with religion and long live atheism;
the dissemination of atheist views is our chief task!”
- Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)

"Our program necessarily includes the propaganda of atheism."
- Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)



http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:8290?context=latest

http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:8295?context=latest

http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:6348?context=latest

http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:17478?context=latest


"How can you make a revolution without firing squads?"
- Lenin

http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:17475?context=latest

http://www.c96trading.com/Nagant_NKVD_300h.jpg


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/telegraph/multimedia/archive/01001/Tsar-family_1001874c.jpg

fasgnadh

unread,
Jan 28, 2012, 4:30:29 AM1/28/12
to
On 25/01/2012 9:02 AM, Fidem Turbare, atheist goddess wrote:
> On Jan 24, 1:40 pm, Witziges Rätsel<z...@roer.invalid.com> wrote:
>> On 1/24/2012 4:11 PM, mr_antone wrote:
>>
>>> An Atheist in the Woods
>>
>>> (skip)
>>
>> Do all Christians think that bears can speak?
>
> No, only the bears

You think only the bears think bears can speak?

> who are Christians.

It's a miracle! B^D


It was MEANT to be funny, this
is far more preposterous and MEANT TO BE SERIOUS:


Ex- Atheist, now Prophet, Richard Dawkins claims a "superpowerful
intelligent and moral energy" entity, "like God", is plausible and
could have 'evolved' somewhere in the Universe "by an explicable
scientific progression of incremental evolution", (which no
atheist can explain). B^D

# "After two hours of conversation, Professor Dawkins walks far afield.
# He talks of the possibility that we might co-evolve with computers, a
# silicon destiny. And he’s intrigued by the playful, even soul-stirring
# writings of Freeman Dyson, the theoretical physicist.
#
# 'In one essay, Professor Dyson casts millions of speculative years
# into the future. Our galaxy is dying and humans have evolved into
# something like bolts of superpowerful intelligent and moral energy.
#
# Doesn’t that description sound an awful lot like God?
#
# "Certainly," Professor Dawkins replies. "It’s highly plausible that
# in the universe there are God-like creatures."
#
# He raises his hand, just in case a reader thinks he’s gone around a
# religious bend. "It’s very important to understand that these Gods
# came into being by an explicable scientific progression of
# incremental evolution."'
#
# Could they be immortal? The professor shrugs.
#
# “Probably not.” He smiles and adds, “But I
# wouldn’t want to be too dogmatic about that.”"


MAKES TALKING BEARS LOOK LIKE A TRIVIAL EXERCISE! B^D



http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/20/science/20dawkins.html?pagewanted=all

fasgnadh

unread,
Jan 28, 2012, 4:36:11 AM1/28/12
to
On 25/01/2012 10:03 AM, Rob Par wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:07:14 -0600, mr_antone<mr_a...@see.reply.to> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:40:35 -0500, Witziges Rätsel
>> <z...@roer.invalid.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 1/24/2012 4:11 PM, mr_antone wrote:
>>>>
>>>> An Atheist in the Woods
>>>>
>>>> (skip)
>>>>
>>> Do all Christians think that bears can speak?
>>>
>>
>> Don't know why not. Some Christians believe god speaks.


Ex- Atheist, now Prophet, Richard Dawkins agrees:

a "superpowerful intelligent and moral energy" entity,
"like God", is "plausible" and 'came into being" -'evolved',
somewhere in the Universe "by an explicable scientific
progression of incremental evolution", (which no atheist can explain).
B^D

Makes talking bears look like Child's Play, eh? B^D


# "After two hours of conversation, Professor Dawkins walks far afield.
# He talks of the possibility that we might co-evolve with computers, a
# silicon destiny. And he’s intrigued by the playful, even soul-stirring
# writings of Freeman Dyson, the theoretical physicist.
#
# 'In one essay, Professor Dyson casts millions of speculative years
# into the future. Our galaxy is dying and humans have evolved into
# something like bolts of superpowerful intelligent and moral energy.
#
# Doesn’t that description sound an awful lot like God?
#
# "Certainly," Professor Dawkins replies. "It’s highly plausible that
# in the universe there are God-like creatures."
#
# He raises his hand, just in case a reader thinks he’s gone around a
# religious bend. "It’s very important to understand that these Gods
# came into being by an explicable scientific progression of
# incremental evolution."'
#
# Could they be immortal? The professor shrugs.
#
# “Probably not.” He smiles and adds, “But I
# wouldn’t want to be too dogmatic about that.”"



http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/20/science/20dawkins.html?pagewanted=all


> love this kind of bull shit.

fasgnadh

unread,
Jan 28, 2012, 5:25:17 AM1/28/12
to
On 25/01/2012 3:28 PM, SkyEyes wrote:
> On Jan 24, 3:07 pm, mr_antone<mr_ant...@see.reply.to> wrote:
>> On Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:40:35 -0500, Witziges Rätsel
>>
>> <z...@roer.invalid.com> wrote:
>>> On 1/24/2012 4:11 PM, mr_antone wrote:
>>
>>>> An Atheist in the Woods
>>>>
>>>> An atheist was walking through the woods.
>>>> "What majestic trees!"
>>>> "What powerful rivers!"
>>>> "What beautiful animals!"
>>>> He said to himself.
>>>>
>>>> As he was walking alongside the river, he heard a rustling in the
>>>> bushes behind him.
>>>>
>>>> He turned to look. He saw a 7-foot grizzly bear charge towards him.
>>>>
>>>> He ran as fast as he could up the path. He looked over his shoulder &
>>>> saw that the bear was closing in on him.
>>>>
>>>> He looked over his shoulder again, & the bear was even closer.
>>>>
>>>> He tripped & fell on the ground.
>>>>
>>>> He rolled over to pick himself up but saw that the bear was right on
>>>> top of him, reaching for him with his left paw & raising his right paw
>>>> to strike him.
>>>>
>>>> At that instant the Atheist cried out, "Oh my God!"
>>>>
>>>> Time Stopped.
>>>> The bear froze.
>>>> The forest was silent.
>>>>
>>>> As a bright light shone upon the man, a voice came out of the sky.
>>>>
>>>> "You deny my existence for all these years, teach others I don't exist
>>>> and even credit creation to cosmic accident."
>>>> "Do you expect me to help you out of this predicament?"
>>>>
>>>> "Am I to count you as a believer?"
>>>>
>>>> The atheist looked directly into the light, "Oh, no, but perhaps
>>>> you could make the BEAR a Christian."
>>>>
>>>> "Very Well," said the voice.
>>>>
>>>> The light went out. The sounds of the forest resumed. And the bear
>>>> dropped his right paw, brought both paws together, bowed his head &
>>>> spoke:
>>>>
>>>> 'Lord bless this food, which I am about to receive from thy bounty
>>>> through Christ our Lord, Amen.'
>>
>>> Do all Christians think that bears can speak?


It was a joke, a deliberate one.

You just can't help BEING one.

>> Don't know why not.

He evolved that way, Like Prophet Dawkin's Gods:

Ex- Atheist, now Prophet, Richard Dawkins claims a "superpowerful
intelligent and moral energy" entity, "like God", is plausible and
could have 'evolved' somewhere in the Universe "by an explicable
scientific progression of incremental evolution", (which no
atheist can explain). B^D

# "After two hours of conversation, Professor Dawkins walks far afield.
# He talks of the possibility that we might co-evolve with computers, a
# silicon destiny. And he’s intrigued by the playful, even soul-stirring
# writings of Freeman Dyson, the theoretical physicist.
#
# 'In one essay, Professor Dyson casts millions of speculative years
# into the future. Our galaxy is dying and humans have evolved into
# something like bolts of superpowerful intelligent and moral energy.
#
# Doesn’t that description sound an awful lot like God?
#
# "Certainly," Professor Dawkins replies. "It’s highly plausible that
# in the universe there are God-like creatures."
#
# He raises his hand, just in case a reader thinks he’s gone around a
# religious bend. "It’s very important to understand that these Gods
# came into being by an explicable scientific progression of
# incremental evolution."'
#
# Could they be immortal? The professor shrugs.
#
# “Probably not.” He smiles and adds, “But I
# wouldn’t want to be too dogmatic about that.”"


http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/20/science/20dawkins.html?pagewanted=all

> But none of them have any objective evidence that a god exists.

Prophet Dawkins claims they just 'evolved'

If that is all required for ATHEIST BELIEF, then
that is all that's required for THEIST belief.

Q.E.D.

So, which atheist is going to explain the inexplicable,
unscientific, BELIEF in "these {atheist] Gods", with no proof
whatsoever, and show us the evidence of how, and where, God evolved?

...........................................................

...........................................................

...........................................................

> Funny, that.

Bloody HILARIOUS!

Atheism has always been a joke,

Now you ALL are! B^D

Bring back the TALKING BEARS, they were MUCH FUNNIER,
in a DELIBERATELY humorous way!


> Brenda Nelson, A.A.#34

34, numbrs are dwindling.. BAAWA hasn't had a new
recruit in years and the old ones are dying or giving up.

> BAAWA Knight



Ahh, one of the Brutal Atheist Animals Without Agape who
advocate crimes against humanity and the violent extermination
of theists...

> of the Golden Litterbox

So you are the one in charge of all the shit atheists talk!


# From: Steve Knight <skni...@cox.net>
# Newsgroups: alt.atheism
# Subject: A.A. BAAWA - FAQ
# Message-ID: <p8mrb5lvaf0cj5bp1...@4ax.com>
# Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 02:46:34 -0700
#
# We kill theists and shit down their throats
#
# Warlord Steve
# BAAWA

Not satisfied with murder, Steve favours GENOCIDE

# From: Steve Knight <skni...@cox.net>
# Newsgroups: alt.atheism,alt.religion.islam
# Subject: Re: Islam: the perfect religion and way of life for all
# Message-ID: <8t6ve5hs41qn3a2rv...@4ax.com>
# Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2009 18:58:18 -0800
#
# On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 21:22:32 +0200, "Katrina"
# <blondes_g...@yahoo.com> wrote:
#
# >Islam: the perfect religion and way of life for all
#
# It is the most foul, disgusting filth on Earth.
# The sooner we nuke you fuckers, the better.
#
# Warlord Steve
# BAAWA


So you genocidal militant atheist lunatics didn't manage
to complete the job when your psychopath Komrades
killed over 60,000,000 in the totalitarian Atheist states
of the 20th century..

Lets make sure you don't get another chance.

Brave Burger

unread,
Jan 28, 2012, 5:33:56 AM1/28/12
to
> Ex- Atheist, now Prophet, Richard Dawkins claims a "superpowerful
> intelligent and moral energy" entity, "like God", is plausible and
> could have 'evolved' somewhere in the Universe "by an explicable
> scientific progression of incremental evolution", (which no
> atheist can explain). B^D

No we can`t explain it to the the ones who want to stay blind in
every way, that is true. You can lead a horse to water, but you
can`t make it drink.


Brave Burger

unread,
Jan 28, 2012, 5:35:11 AM1/28/12
to
> So you genocidal militant atheist lunatics didn't manage
> to complete the job when your psychopath Komrades
> killed over 60,000,000 in the totalitarian Atheist states
> of the 20th century..
>
> Lets make sure you don't get another chance.

Your God has killed many more, so have cigarettes,


fasgnadh

unread,
Jan 28, 2012, 5:44:13 AM1/28/12
to
On 27/01/2012 7:36 PM, SkyEyes wrote:
> On Jan 24, 9:39 pm, "Fidem Turbare, atheist goddess"
> <fidem.turb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Jan 24, 8:29 pm, SkyEyes<skyey...@cox.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Jan 24, 9:26 pm, "Fidem Turbare, atheist goddess"
>>> <fidem.turb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Jan 24, 6:39 pm, Christopher A. Lee<ca...@optonline.net> wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 24 Jan 2012 21:27:42 -0500, Ben Kaufman
>>>>> <spaXm-mXe-anXd-paXy-5000-doll...@pobox.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, 24 Jan 2012 14:29:10 -0800, Christopher A. Lee<ca...@optonline.net>
More than atheists, historically someone does their thinking for them:


http://www.thearchetypalconnection.com/images/RedGuardsLow.JPG

>>>>>>> bears shit in the woods?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> animals don't poop.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Oh, shit.
>>>>
>>>> Then where does "holy shit" come from??

Well as the atheist responses to a joke was to show they
all ARE ONE, you would have to say it comes mostly from
Prophet Dawkins, Pontificator of the

First United Church of Kooky Evolved Deities

Ex- Atheist, now Prophet, Richard Dawkins claims a "superpowerful
intelligent and moral energy" entity, "like God", is plausible and
could have 'evolved' somewhere in the Universe "by an explicable
scientific progression of incremental evolution", (which no
atheist can explain). B^D

# "After two hours of conversation, Professor Dawkins walks far afield.
# He talks of the possibility that we might co-evolve with computers, a
# silicon destiny. And he’s intrigued by the playful, even soul-stirring
# writings of Freeman Dyson, the theoretical physicist.
#
# 'In one essay, Professor Dyson casts millions of speculative years
# into the future. Our galaxy is dying and humans have evolved into
# something like bolts of superpowerful intelligent and moral energy.
#
# Doesn’t that description sound an awful lot like God?
#
# "Certainly," Professor Dawkins replies. "It’s highly plausible that
# in the universe there are God-like creatures."
#
# He raises his hand, just in case a reader thinks he’s gone around a
# religious bend. "It’s very important to understand that these Gods
# came into being by an explicable scientific progression of
# incremental evolution."'
#
# Could they be immortal? The professor shrugs.
#
# “Probably not.” He smiles and adds, “But I
# wouldn’t want to be too dogmatic about that.”"

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/20/science/20dawkins.html?pagewanted=all

Don't ask where these Kooks get this shit from!

>>> It came from my dog after she ate
>>
>> For your dog's sake, I hope it wasn't one these

http://www.thinkatheist.com/group/atheistcake/forum/topics/the-beaker-cake

http://api.ning.com/files/*vz*PHhuh-vrFDKCJqazQfm7mqnuSYyMFTtDKv0nUmwqRelBcZ0IJXy*gf57bymy*AnV6A4WdtQLHJjGgLwOJAEh8ENFcXf7/FlyingSpaghettiCake.JPG

>
> No, it was a beautiful book with rice-paper pages and bound in black
> lambskin that my parents had given to me when I was 14. Years later,
> when my mother asked where the bible was, I had to tell her about that
> cute little Greek dog (sitting at the moment on the floor under the
> kitchen table) who had gotten mad that we'd left her alone so long one
> night, and eaten the bible to punish me. Poor Mom didn't know whether
> to laugh or cry or kick the dog.
>
> Brenda Nelson, A.A.#34
> BAAWA Knight of the Golden Litterbox
> EAC Professor of Feline Thermometrics and Cat-Herding
> skyeyes nine at cox dot net OR
> skyeyes nine at yahoo dot com


--




So, which atheist is going to explain the inexplicable,
unscientific, BELIEF in "these {atheist] Gods", with no proof
whatsoever, and show us the evidence of how, and where, God evolved?

...........................................................

...........................................................

...........................................................


fasgnadh

unread,
Jan 28, 2012, 7:34:11 AM1/28/12
to
Brave Burger says he know's How these atheist "gods came into being":
> On 28/01/2012 8:30 PM, fasgnadh wrote:
>> On 25/01/2012 9:02 AM, Fidem Turbare, atheist goddess wrote:
>>> On Jan 24, 1:40 pm, Witziges Rätsel<z...@roer.invalid.com> wrote:
>>>> On 1/24/2012 4:11 PM, mr_antone wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> An Atheist in the Woods
>>>>
>>>>> (skip)
>>>>
>>>> Do all Christians think that bears can speak?
>>>
>>> No, only the bears
>>
>> You think only the bears think bears can speak?
>>
>> > who are Christians.
>>
>> It's a miracle! B^D
>>
>>
>> It was MEANT to be funny, this
>> is far more preposterous and MEANT TO BE SERIOUS:
>>
>>
>> Ex- Atheist, now Prophet, Richard Dawkins claims a "superpowerful
>> intelligent and moral energy" entity, "like God", is plausible and
>> could have 'evolved' somewhere in the Universe "by an explicable
>> scientific progression of incremental evolution", (which no
>> atheist can explain). B^D
>>
> No we can`t explain it to the the ones who want to stay blind in
> every way, that is true.

Why do you want to be like that?

If you had the explanation you would share it.. surely!?

But no atheist has because there is no EVIDENCE that these
atheist 'Gods' 'came into being' at all! B^D

You've been HOAXED by Prophet Dawkins!

there is no evidence for the baseless assertion that these
atheist "GODS" exist, let alone an explanation of HOW they
'came into being' pfffft

Dawkins Dogma and the BLIND BELIEF of atheist sheeple in it
is due to their inexplicable unscientific regression of decremental
devolution.

You are all member's of Prophet Dawkin's IRRATIONAL ATHEIST CULT:

The First United Church of Kooky Evolved Deities.

You're F.U.C.K.E.D.

BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAAHAAA

> You can lead a horse to water, but you
> can`t make it drink.

sure you can, but why do you want to if it isn't thirsty?

http://usarmy.vo.llnwd.net/e2/-images/2009/02/10/29827/size0-army.mil-29827-2009-02-11-080259.jpg



You can lead an atheist horses arse to the truth,
but you can't make it THINK!






--

Ex- Atheist, now Prophet, Richard Dawkins claims a "superpowerful
intelligent and moral energy" entity, "like God", is plausible and
could have 'evolved' somewhere in the Universe "by an explicable
scientific progression of incremental evolution", (which no
atheist can explain). B^D

# "After two hours of conversation, Professor Dawkins walks far afield.
# He talks of the possibility that we might co-evolve with computers, a
# silicon destiny. And he’s intrigued by the playful, even soul-stirring
# writings of Freeman Dyson, the theoretical physicist.
#
# 'In one essay, Professor Dyson casts millions of speculative years
# into the future. Our galaxy is dying and humans have evolved into
# something like bolts of superpowerful intelligent and moral energy.
#
# Doesn’t that description sound an awful lot like God?
#
# "Certainly," Professor Dawkins replies. "It’s highly plausible that
# in the universe there are God-like creatures."
#
# He raises his hand, just in case a reader thinks he’s gone around a
# religious bend. "It’s very important to understand that these Gods
# came into being by an explicable scientific progression of
# incremental evolution."'
#
# Could they be immortal? The professor shrugs.
#
# “Probably not.” He smiles and adds, “But I
# wouldn’t want to be too dogmatic about that.”"



fasgnadh

unread,
Jan 28, 2012, 8:02:15 AM1/28/12
to
Brave Burger claims God exists, but presents no evidence:
I'm an agnostic, dipshit, it's you ATHEISTS following Prophet
Dawkins Dogma who claim these atheist "gods came
into being" - Prophet Dawkins
"First United Church of Kooky Evolved Deities"


So, which atheist is going to explain the inexplicable,
unscientific, BELIEF in Prophet Dawkin's Dogma that atheist
Gods exist, and tell us HOW these atheist "Gods came into being"
because there is no evidence whatsoever of how an IMMATERIAL
God evolved!?!!! pffft

...........................................................

...........................................................

...........................................................

Brave Burger

unread,
Jan 29, 2012, 1:00:57 PM1/29/12
to
> I'm an agnostic dipshit,

That comma wasn`t nescesary, I removed it
and I know you are ba coward, the undefined entity
of God you worship so you have no accounatbility.

> it's you ATHEISTS following Prophet
> Dawkins Dogma who claim these atheist "gods came
> into being" - Prophet Dawkins

I don`t follow anything, not even this one, but that a creature could evolve
which had godlike attributes? Why not? It isn`t crazier then your creatiin
idea, oh sorry, you have no idea's, you are agnostic, there might be a
undefinable somthing out there.

> "First United Church of Kooky Evolved Deities"

No I don`t think it is there, and if it is, it is righteous bastard.

>
> So, which atheist is going to explain the inexplicable,
> unscientific, BELIEF in Prophet Dawkin's Dogma that atheist
> Gods exist, and tell us HOW these atheist "Gods came into being"
> because there is no evidence whatsoever of how an IMMATERIAL
> God evolved!?!!! pffft

I am not going to explain it, that would make me that being probably if
I could. And then you wouldn`t have a clue if I did. But you already have no
clue,
You follow, 'something-ism'


Brave Burger

unread,
Jan 29, 2012, 1:05:13 PM1/29/12
to
Like what?

> If you had the explanation you would share it.. surely!?

That isn`t a given, I could just as easily to myself, and maybe
for a good reason een then. Because you wopuldn`t get it anyway.

> But no atheist has because there is no EVIDENCE that these
> atheist 'Gods' 'came into being' at all! B^D

Exactly, but a possibility that one might is plausible.

> You've been HOAXED by Prophet Dawkins!

I haven`t been anything, to tell you the truth, I hadn`t heard about it
before you mentioned it, but the idea is plausible.

> there is no evidence for the baseless assertion that these
> atheist "GODS" exist, let alone an explanation of HOW they
> 'came into being' pfffft

Exactly, and if he did came into being, he is an asshole for niot using
his powers to help out the lesser creatures. But neither is your God,
whatever it might be.

fasgnadh

unread,
Jan 31, 2012, 8:10:02 AM1/31/12
to
Fidem Turdbar, atheist goddess needs some coaching:
> Smiler<Youmus...@JoeKing.com> gives Turdbar a heads up:
>> Fidem Turdbar , atheist goddess is clueless:
> It's only natural that atheists ...can truly enjoy humour.

I'm glad they can laugh at themselves just as others laugh at you
for being INADVERTENTLY laughable.

> we thoroughly enjoy laughing at ourselves.

Well Dawkin's unproven claims about atheist "Gods came into being.."
certainly is ludicrous and Laughable for anyone, especially atheists

BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAAA


>>>> you would have to say it comes mostly from
>>>> Prophet Dawkins, Pontificator of the
>>>>
>>>> First United Church of Kooky Evolved Deities
>>>>
>>> Which one?

The First one, dimwit

> Don't they all claim to be the first and only?

This is the First ATHEIST ONE, B^D Priceless!

>> Check the acronym.

He's a bit S-L-O-W isn't he! ;-]

> Ha ha! Nice catch.

Ah you are small fry.. i'll throw you back...

> My mind must've been on a different plain.

Do you mean plane?


> (With an acronym like that it just has to be the first.)

Actually every atheist state has been the same acronym! B^]



>>>> Ex- Atheist, now Prophet, Richard Dawkins claims a "superpowerful
>>>> intelligent and moral energy" entity, "like God", is plausible and
>>>> could have 'evolved' somewhere in the Universe "by an explicable
>>>> scientific progression of incremental evolution", (which no
>>>> atheist can explain). B^D
>>>>

>>> [snip - unfamiliar scripture]

<unsnip>

you mean you don't know about Prophet Dawkins
converting to theism:

BWAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAA

fasgnadh

unread,
Jan 31, 2012, 8:30:37 AM1/31/12
to
On 30/01/2012 5:00 AM, Brave Burger wrote:
> fasgnadh wrote:
>> Brave Burger claims God exists, but presents no evidence:
>>> On 28/01/2012 9:25 PM, fasgnadh wrote:
>>>> On 25/01/2012 3:28 PM, SkyEyes wrote:
>>>>> On Jan 24, 3:07 pm, mr_antone<mr_ant...@see.reply.to> wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:40:35 -0500, Witziges Rätsel
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <z...@roer.invalid.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 1/24/2012 4:11 PM, mr_antone wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> An Atheist in the Woods
>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>>> An atheist was walking through the woods.
>>>>>>>> "What majestic trees!"
>>>>>>>> "What powerful rivers!"
>>>>>>>> "What beautiful animals!"
>>>>>>>> He said to himself.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> As he was walking alongside the river, he heard a rustling in the
>>>>>>>> bushes behind him.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> He turned to look. He saw a 7-foot grizzly bear charge towards him.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> He ran as fast as he could up the path. He looked over his shoulder&
>>>>>>>> saw that the bear was closing in on him.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> He looked over his shoulder again,& the bear was even closer.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> He tripped& fell on the ground.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> He rolled over to pick himself up but saw that the bear was right on
>>>>>>>> top of him, reaching for him with his left paw& raising his right paw
>> I'm an agnostic, dipshit,
>
> and I know you are

Then why crap on about my God killing.. you Fuckwit.

> ba

another atheist sheep.

> coward,

alright cowardly sheep.

> the undefined entity of God you worship

I'm an agnostic, dipshit.. (is there an echo in here? B^)

>so you have no accounatbility.

Have no what? Please don't talk with Olriks cock
in your mouth it makes you (even more) unintelligible.

>> it's you ATHEISTS following Prophet
>> Dawkins Dogma who claim these atheist "gods came
>> into being" - Prophet Dawkins
>
> I don`t follow anything,

you certainly can't follow a rational argument in a post! B^D

> not even this one,

and it's easy.. I've made it clear and SIMPLE just for you...

> but that a creature could evolve which had godlike attributes?

You mean you think God could exist.. but evolved? B^D

Look, dimwit he claimed "It’s very important to understand
that these Gods *came into being*.. " past tense

He claims they EXIST...

> Why not?

PROVE IT!

...and the rest of you atheist quarterwits deny
ANY God exists.

Go sort your SHAMBOLIC CULT OF DOPEY DIMWITS OUT!!

BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAA

> It isn`t crazier then your creatiin

I told you.. take Olriks cock out of yourmouth when speaking,
you are garbled...

> oh sorry,

Don't do it again, Kook-Sucker.

How did you ever become so debased?

> you have no idea

Thankfully, no.


< you are agnostic,

Yes.

> there might be a
> undefinable somthing out there.

So?

Why don't you help Bukakke prepare the
altar so you can all 'come worshipping'
with her :


# From: Budikka666 <budi...@netscape.net>
# Newsgroups:
alt.atheism,talk.atheism,alt.talk.creationism,alt.religion,alt.religion.christian
# Subject: Disapproving Creation: Debunking Flatnads Juvenile Bullshit
Number Whatever
# Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 15:23:40 -0800 (PST)
# Message-ID:
<b5430732-e52e-45b5...@p13g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>
#
#
#> come worshiping at the altar of atheism,


in the atheist's

>> "First United Church of Kooky Evolved Deities"
>
> No I don`t think

Makes you perfect for that atheist congregation

is the atheist altar ready?

> it is there,
> and if it is, it is righteous

Whatever you Say, Bishop
> bastard
-Burger

>> So, which atheist is going to explain the inexplicable,
>> unscientific, BELIEF in Prophet Dawkin's Dogma that atheist
>> Gods exist, and tell us HOW these atheist "Gods came into being"
>> because there is no evidence whatsoever of how an IMMATERIAL
>> God evolved!?!!! pffft
>
> I am not going to explain it

That was a given. Just keep working on tying yer shoelaces.

>


--
So, which atheist is going to explain the inexplicable,
unscientific, BELIEF in "these {atheist] Gods", with no proof
whatsoever, and show us the evidence of how, and where, God evolved?

...........................................................

...........................................................

...........................................................


fasgnadh

unread,
Jan 31, 2012, 8:36:22 AM1/31/12
to
Can you say that in English .. I don't speak Gibber.

>> But no atheist has because there is no EVIDENCE that these
>> atheist 'Gods' 'came into being' at all! B^D
>
> Exactly, but a possibility that one might is plausible.

"these Gods came into being" is a categorical claim
of it having HAPPENED ALREADY..

Where is your evidence that it HAS HAPPENED?


>> You've been HOAXED by Prophet Dawkins!
>
> I haven`t been anything, to tell you the truth, I hadn`t heard about it
> before you mentioned it, but the idea is plausible.

"these Gods came into being" is not claim to plausibility,
it's a claim of ACTUALITY.

Where's the proof these Gods EXIST?


>> there is no evidence for the baseless assertion that these
>> atheist "GODS" exist, let alone an explanation of HOW they
>> 'came into being' pfffft
>
> Exactly

.. Q.E.D.

Atheists have beliefs and they have NO EVIDENCE FOR THEM!

B^]

fasgnadh

unread,
Jan 31, 2012, 8:41:02 AM1/31/12
to
On 30/01/2012 7:27 AM, Rob Par wrote:
> On 30/01/2012 5:05 AM, Brave Burger wrote:
Can you say that in English .. I don't speak Gibber.

>>> But no atheist has because there is no EVIDENCE that these
>>> atheist 'Gods' 'came into being' at all! B^D
>>
>> Exactly, but a possibility that one might is plausible.

"these Gods came into being" is a categorical claim
of it having HAPPENED ALREADY..

Where is your evidence that it HAS HAPPENED?


> It's even plausible that some where in the universe or
> even on the planet earth there is a Christian that is intelligent.

But not an atheist? As you wish.

>>> You've been HOAXED by Prophet Dawkins!
>>
>> I haven`t been anything, to tell you the truth, I hadn`t heard about it
>> before you mentioned it, but the idea is plausible.

"these Gods came into being" is not claim to plausibility,
it's a claim of ACTUALITY.

Where's the proof these Gods EXIST?


>>> there is no evidence for the baseless assertion that these
>>> atheist "GODS" exist, let alone an explanation of HOW they
>>> 'came into being' pfffft
>>
>> Exactly

.. Q.E.D.

Atheists have beliefs and they have NO EVIDENCE FOR THEM!

B^]


>>

Brave Burger

unread,
Jan 31, 2012, 10:56:43 PM1/31/12
to
>>> I'm an agnostic, dipshit,
>>
>> and I know you are
>
> Then why crap on about my God killing.. you Fuckwit.
>
>> ba
>
> another atheist sheep.

<ploink> another attention whore (just like
his undefined God) bites the dust, no more attention
for the relitard troll, bye bye, dustbin dweller.



0 new messages