Re: James Cameron's Avatar - a Stunning Achievement
fasgnadh
>> Budikka666 <budi...@netscape.net> talks with her mouth full:
>>
>> : Let's completely forget that he doesn't know a thing about the phsyics
>> : of this planet nor of the materials that were fapparently "floating" -
>> : becuaser you all know as well as I do tha tunder no circumstnaces,
>> : anywher eint eh unvierse under no conditions whatsoever
>> : can.any.rocks.float.
>>
> You're an idiot.
That goes without saying, but she seems to be sucking cock while
speaking! B^D
> suck so badly.
Ah, so it's YOU in her mouth!!!
BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAA
I hope you have had your shots! ;-)
--
alt.atheism FAQ:
http://altatheismfaq.blogspot.com/
http://groups.google.com.au/group/alt.atheism/msg/7c0978c14fd4ed37?hl=en&dmode=source
"Atheism is the natural and inseparable part of Communism."
-Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)
http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:8295?context=latest
http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:8290?context=latest
"Our program necessarily includes the propaganda of atheism."
- Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov (Lenin)
http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:6348?context=latest
http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:17478?context=latest
"How can you make a revolution without firing squads?"
- Lenin
http://www.atheistnexus.org/photo/2182797:Photo:17475?context=latest
http://www.c96trading.com/Nagant_NKVD_300h.jpg
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/telegraph/multimedia/archive/01001/Tsar-family_1001874c.jpg
Mavisbeacon
"fasgnadh" <fasg...@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
news:5iZYm.64604$ze1....@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
> Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy wrote:
>
>>> Budikka666 <budi...@netscape.net> talks with her mouth full:
> >>
>>> : Let's completely forget that he doesn't know a thing about the phsyics
>>> : of this planet nor of the materials that were fapparently "floating" -
>>> : becuaser you all know as well as I do tha tunder no circumstnaces,
>>> : anywher eint eh unvierse under no conditions whatsoever
>>> : can.any.rocks.float.
>>>
Some boats are made of concrete, and one could float an asteroid on a lake
of Mercury.
regn.pickfod
or an island like Australia over a molten core, apparantly.
fasgnadh
> fasgnadh wrote:
>> Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy wrote:
>>
>>>> Budikka666 <budi...@netscape.net> talks with her mouth full:
>> >>
>>>> : Let's completely forget that he doesn't know a thing about the phsyics
>>>> : of this planet nor of the materials that were fapparently "floating" -
>>>> : becuaser you all know as well as I do tha tunder no circumstnaces,
>>>> : anywher eint eh unvierse under no conditions whatsoever
>>>> : can.any.rocks.float.
>>>>
>>
>> That goes without saying, but she seems to be sucking cock while
>> speaking! B^D
>>
>>
>>> suck so badly.
>>
>>
>> Ah, so it's YOU in her mouth!!!
>>
>> BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAA
>>
>>
>> I hope you have had your shots! ;-)
>
> Some boats are made of concrete,
Some heads are made of wood, apparently.
Are you claiming the "floating mountains" are hollow
and float by displacing the thin breathable atmosphere of Pandora? B^]
Why don't you demonstrate your theory by posting to
youtube your success with a concrete balloon! B^D
> and one could float an asteroid on a lake
> of Mercury.
Are you claiming the atmosphere on Pandora is Mercury?
How come we see so much detail through it, and how
do the inhabitants move so quickly through it.
and WHY do their flying machines have propellers,
if they can just 'displace' their own volume of 'Mercury'!?
B^D
Chesterton was right;
"When people stop believing in God, they don't believe in nothing
� they believe in anything." - G.K. Chesterton:
fasgnadh
> Mavisbeacon wrote:
>> fasgnadh wrote:
>>> Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Budikka666 <budi...@netscape.net> talks with her mouth full:
>>> >>
>>>>> : Let's completely forget that he doesn't know a thing about the
>>>>> phsyics
>>>>> : of this planet nor of the materials that were fapparently
>>>>> "floating" -
>>>>> : becuaser you all know as well as I do tha tunder no circumstnaces,
>>>>> : anywher eint eh unvierse under no conditions whatsoever
>>>>> : can.any.rocks.float.
>>>>>
>>>
>>> That goes without saying, but she seems to be sucking cock while
>>> speaking! B^D
>>>
>>>
>>>> suck so badly.
>>>
>>>
>>> Ah, so it's YOU in her mouth!!!
>>>
>>> BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAA
>>>
>>>
>>> I hope you have had your shots! ;-)
>
>>
Some heads are made of wood, apparently.
Are you claiming the "floating mountains" are hollow
and float by displacing the thin breathable atmosphere of Pandora? B^]
Why don't you demonstrate your theory by posting to
youtube your success with a concrete balloon! B^D
>> and one could float an asteroid on a lake
>> of Mercury.
Are you claiming the atmosphere on Pandora is Mercury?
How come we see so much detail through it, and how
do the inhabitants move so quickly through it.
and WHY do their flying machines have propellers,
if they can just 'displace' their own volume of 'Mercury'!?
B^D
Chesterton was right;
"When people stop believing in God, they don't believe in nothing
� they believe in anything." - G.K. Chesterton:
> or an island like Australia over a molten core, apparantly.
It's unfortunate for your theory than there are no
continents floating in the AIR! B^D
And yet you propose an arrow could be shot through such
a dense medium in which MOUNTAINS would float?!!?
It must make lovemaking on Pandora a real effort..
but it would certainly be Hot Sex!
Pandora's atmosphere would have to be denser than you are! B^D
And none of the action shown indicates that it takes place in
Lava, Mercury or anything other than the IMAGINATION OF ATHEISTS
and their FANTASIES..
You would be interested in the Sequel: "Gullibles Travels"
Book your seat on the Tardis now!
BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAAHAAA
Mavisbeacon
> regn.pickfod wrote:
>> Mavisbeacon wrote:
>>> fasgnadh wrote:
>>>> Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> Budikka666 <budi...@netscape.net> talks with her mouth full:
>>>> >>
>>>>>> : Let's completely forget that he doesn't know a thing about the
>>>>>> phsyics
>>>>>> : of this planet nor of the materials that were fapparently
>>>>>> "floating" -
>>>>>> : becuaser you all know as well as I do tha tunder no circumstnaces,
>>>>>> : anywher eint eh unvierse under no conditions whatsoever
>>>>>> : can.any.rocks.float.
>>>>>>
>>>>> You're an idiot.
>>>>
>>>> That goes without saying, but she seems to be sucking cock while
>>>> speaking! B^D
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> suck so badly.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ah, so it's YOU in her mouth!!!
>>>>
>>>> BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAA
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I hope you have had your shots! ;-)
>>
>>>
>>> Some boats are made of concrete,
>
> Some heads are made of wood, apparently.
>
> Are you claiming the "floating mountains" are hollow
> and float by displacing the thin breathable atmosphere of Pandora?
> B^]
No. I am just offering a counter argument to the claim that nowhere in the
universe can rocks float.
First it depends on what one calls a rock.
and that isnt a reference to petros/petra'kephos.
Second, even given a rock as big as an asteroid it is technically possible
to "float" it.
>
> Why don't you demonstrate your theory by posting to
> youtube your success with a concrete balloon! B^D
Now you are considering a roick floating on air. If one could construct
monomecular thin concrete or a silicate gel base maybe one could construct a
baloon big enough flled with say hydrogen to float in air.
>
>
>>> and one could float an asteroid on a lake
>>> of Mercury.
>
>
> Are you claiming the atmosphere on Pandora is Mercury?
No.
No. I am just offering a counter argument to the claim that nowhere in the
universe can rocks float.
First it depends on what one calls a rock.
and that isnt a reference to petros/petra'kephos.
Second, even given a rock as big as an asteroid it is technically possible
to "float" it.
I do not know abouit any Pandora. Is it something to do with Cameron's film?
>
> How come we see so much detail through it, and how
> do the inhabitants move so quickly through it.
>
> and WHY do their flying machines have propellers,
> if they can just 'displace' their own volume of 'Mercury'!?
>
> B^D
I dont know
I was only offering a counter argument to the claim that nowhere in the
universe can rocks float.
First it depends on what one calls a rock.
and that isnt a reference to petros/petra'kephos.
Second, even given a rock as big as an asteroid it is technically possible
to "float" it.
fasgnadh
> fasgnadh wrote:
>> Howard Brazee wrote:
>>> On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 14:18:53 -0800 (PST), Budikka666
>>> <budi...@netscape.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> That particular tool was used for both - that's what I was comparing.
>>>>> The results are obviously different.
>> >>
>>>> As I indicated by my statement that "Avatar is nothing whatsoever like
>>>> Polar Express".
>>>>
>>>> I'm so sorry you missed that. Please do forgive me. it was obviously
>>>> my fault, because you quite obviously know everything, even about
>>>> conditions on planets several light years away
>>>
>>> Interesting. What is it that I quite obviously know? (And why
>>> didn't I tell me about it?)
>>>
>>
>> It's really quite simple: she is embarrassed at being caught out
>> and is doing the Dance of the Flaming Arseholes* to distract from
>> her humiliation.
Engaging in a battle of wits with atheists is fighting unarmed opponents!
All they have left is feeble, unoriginal, parroted imitation,
this example was posted by Virgil the serial post forger who
attributed it to me;
> It's really quite simple: Faggotnuts is embarrassed
> at being caught out and is doing the Dance of
> the Flaming Arseholes* to distract from
> its humiliation.
When atheism relies on such desperate duplicity, it has lost!
>> Feeble facetiousness is all she has left.
Facile fabrication and forged falsehoods are all any atheist has left!
They are a spent force. B^]
>> You pointed out the same software tool was used in both movies,
>> she continues rabbiting on about the ways in which the films
>> are NOT the same, in a desperate attempt to pretend the thing
>> they have in common does not exist! It's hilarious. B^]
>>
>>
>>
>> * Similar to the 'Broken-Wing' performance a mother bird will
>> perform to distract predators from it's vulnerable nest, only
>> the human version involves nudity and a lit newspaper.
Bill Steele
fasgnadh <fasg...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> Virgil wrote:
> > fasgnadh wrote:
> >> Howard Brazee wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 14:18:53 -0800 (PST), Budikka666
> >>> <budi...@netscape.net> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>> That particular tool was used for both - that's what I was comparing.
> >>>>> The results are obviously different.
> >> >>
> >>>> As I indicated by my statement that "Avatar is nothing whatsoever like
> >>>> Polar Express".
> >>>>
> >>>> I'm so sorry you missed that. Please do forgive me. it was obviously
> >>>> my fault, because you quite obviously know everything, even about
> >>>> conditions on planets several light years away
> >>>
> >>> Interesting. What is it that I quite obviously know? (And why
> >>> didn't I tell me about it?)
> >>>
> >>
> >> It's really quite simple: she is embarrassed at being caught out
> >> and is doing the Dance of the Flaming Arseholes* to distract from
> >> her humiliation.
>
> Engaging in a battle of wits with atheists is fighting unarmed opponents!
>
> All they have left is feeble, unoriginal, parroted imitation,
Quoting the Bible is, of course, so creative and original...
Virgil
Engaging in a battle of wits with Faggotnuts is fighting an unarmed
opponent!
All Faggotnuts has left is feeble, unoriginal, parroted imitation of
sanity.
>
> > It's really quite simple: Faggotnuts is embarrassed at being
> > caught out and is doing the Dance of the Flaming Arseholes* to
> > distract from his humongous humiliation.
When Faggotnuts falsehoods rely on such desperate duplicity, he has lost!
>
Facile fabrication and forged falsehoods are all Faggotnuts the
futile failure has left. !
Kadaitcha Man
> Faggotnuts
> Faggotnuts
> Faggotnuts
> Faggotnuts
> Faggotnuts
Were your parents disappointed in you when they found out? Or were they
relieved at the likelihood that you might never breed had been greatly
increased?
fasgnadh
> In article <JykZm.64765$ze1....@news-server.bigpond.net.au>,
> fasgnadh <fasg...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>
>> Virgil wrote:
>>> fasgnadh wrote:
>>>> Howard Brazee wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 14:18:53 -0800 (PST), Budikka666
>>>>> <budi...@netscape.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> That particular tool was used for both - that's what I was comparing.
>>>>>>> The results are obviously different.
>>>> >>
>>>>>> As I indicated by my statement that "Avatar is nothing whatsoever like
>>>>>> Polar Express".
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm so sorry you missed that. Please do forgive me. it was obviously
>>>>>> my fault, because you quite obviously know everything, even about
>>>>>> conditions on planets several light years away
>>>>> Interesting. What is it that I quite obviously know? (And why
>>>>> didn't I tell me about it?)
>>>>>
>>>> It's really quite simple: she is embarrassed at being caught out
>>>> and is doing the Dance of the Flaming Arseholes* to distract from
>>>> her humiliation.
>> Engaging in a battle of wits with atheists is fighting unarmed opponents!
>>
>> All they have left is feeble, unoriginal, parroted imitation,
>
> Quoting the Bible is, of course, so creative and original...
That would be relevant, if, and only if, I was
quoting the Bible! B^p
I wasn't, and even if I was, you are an imbecile
who cannot distinguish between a properly cited reference
to source material to support an original argument,
and a STRAIGHT FORWARD ATHEIST FORGERY, where
Virgil simply cuts and pastes my witty riposte and replaces
the subject's name, and than FALSELY attributes his childish
imitation to me. That is pure PRIMARY SCHOOL "Nyah Nyah no YOU are"!!!
Priceless!
And you are either a juvenile of identical stupidity or a
moral defective just like that other lying atheist piece of shit.
Which is it, Bill? B^]
Instead of reason, or wit, you give us another simply idiotic,
feeble attempt to defend desperate atheist forgeries and lies.
Aren't you ashamed to be so pathetically false? .. and aligned
with such worthless trash as this lying hate-filled bigot,
Virgil the serial atheist forger:
>> this example was posted by Virgil the serial post forger who
>> attributed it to me;
>>
>> > It's really quite simple: Faggotnuts is embarrassed
>> > at being caught out and is doing the Dance of
>> > the Flaming Arseholes* to distract from
>> > its humiliation.
>>
>> When atheism relies on such desperate duplicity, it has lost!
BTW, it is moronic to imply, as Bill the Dill suggests, that citing
reference material is unoriginal.
No one claims that EVERY utterance must be original, otherwise we
could not refer to the works of great scientists, or philosophers
or spiritual leaders.. but most decent folk understand the
difference between properly attributed QUOTATION, and the forgery
and DELIBERATE mis-attribution by atheists documented here.
>>>> Feeble facetiousness is all she has left.
>> Facile fabrication and forged falsehoods are all any atheist has left!
>>
>> They are a spent force. B^]
I guess I am wasting my time expecting ANY rational debate
from atheists.. EVERY atheist in Usenet has demonstrated, on
numerous occasions, that they are as intellectually
and morally bankrupt as these two atheist shiptigs.. the finest
alt.atheism has to offer!
BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAAHAAAAAA
>>
>>>> You pointed out the same software tool was used in both movies,
>>>> she continues rabbiting on about the ways in which the films
>>>> are NOT the same, in a desperate attempt to pretend the thing
>>>> they have in common does not exist! It's hilarious. B^]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> * Similar to the 'Broken-Wing' performance a mother bird will
>>>> perform to distract predators from it's vulnerable nest, only
>>>> the human version involves nudity and a lit newspaper.
>>>>
fasgnadh
> fasgnadh <fasg...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>
>> Virgil wrote:
>>> fasgnadh wrote:
>>>> Howard Brazee wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 14:18:53 -0800 (PST), Budikka666
>>>>> <budi...@netscape.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> That particular tool was used for both - that's what I was
>>>>>>> comparing.
>>>>>>> The results are obviously different.
>>>> >>
>>>>>> As I indicated by my statement that "Avatar is nothing whatsoever
>>>>>> like
>>>>>> Polar Express".
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm so sorry you missed that. Please do forgive me. it was
>>>>>> obviously my fault, because you quite
>>>>>> obviously know everything, even about
>>>>>> conditions on planets several light years away
>>>>>
>>>>> Interesting. What is it that I quite obviously know? (And why
>>>>> didn't I tell me about it?)
Of course, Bukakke RAN AWAY from defending her falsehoods.
>>>> It's really quite simple: she is embarrassed at being caught out
>>>> and is doing the Dance of the Flaming Arseholes* to distract from
>>>> her humiliation.
>>
>> Engaging in a battle of wits with atheists is fighting unarmed
>> opponents!
>>
>> All they have left is feeble, unoriginal, parroted imitation,
>> this example was posted by Virgil the serial post forger who
>> attributed it to me;
>>
>> > It's really quite simple: Faggotnuts is embarrassed
>> > at being caught out and is doing the Dance of
>> > the Flaming Arseholes* to distract from
>> > its humiliation.
>>
>> When atheism relies on such desperate duplicity, it has lost!
And that is atheism remains a tiny, distrusted and despised
minority, because they exhibit the worst attributes of a CULT!
Most decent folk understand the difference RATIONAL debate
supported by peer reviewed historical data and
properly attributed QUOTATION, on one hand, and the forgery
and DELIBERATE mis-attribution by atheists documented here.
>>>>> Feeble facetiousness is all she has left.
>>>
>>> Facile fabrication and forged falsehoods are all any
>>> atheist has left!
>>>
>>> They are a spent force. B^]
I guess I am wasting my time expecting ANY rational debate
from atheists.. EVERY atheist in Usenet has demonstrated, on
numerous occasions, that they are as intellectually
and morally bankrupt as these lying atheist shiptigs.. Virgil
and Bukakke, the finest alt.atheism has to offer!
BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAAHAAAAAA
>>>
>>>>> You pointed out the same software tool was used in both movies,
>>>>> she continues rabbiting on about the ways in which the films
>>>>> are NOT the same, in a desperate attempt to pretend the thing
>>>>> they have in common does not exist! It's hilarious. B^]
* DOFA - Similar to the 'Broken-Wing' performance a mother bird will
perform to distract predators from it's vulnerable nest, only
the human version involves nudity and a lit newspaper.
Bukakke's dance involves mock indignation to cover her lies,
Virgils is bare faced lying, repeated as if repetition will
somehow multiply his credibility.. B^D
Twice Zero is still Zero! B^]
I leave Virgil's pathetic post forging to embarass the entire
atheist community with the desperate dishonisty of their
leading intellectual:
@ This is another atheist forgery brought to you by the
@ sad, pathetic deviants of alt.atheism, who cannot mount
@ a decent argument because they are too busy mounting each other:
@
@ > In article <JykZm.64765$ze1....@news-server.bigpond.net.au>,
@ > fasgnadh <fasg...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
@ >
@ >
@ > Engaging in a battle of wits with Faggotnuts is fighting an unarmed
@ > opponent!
@ >
@ > All Faggotnuts has left is feeble, unoriginal, parroted imitation of
@ > sanity.
@ >> > It's really quite simple: Faggotnuts is embarrassed at being
@ >> > caught out and is doing the Dance of the Flaming Arseholes* to
@ >> > distract from his humongous humiliation.
@ >
@ > When Faggotnuts falsehoods rely on such desperate duplicity, he has
lost!
@ >
@ > Facile fabrication and forged falsehoods are all Faggotnuts the
@ > futile failure has left. !
Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery!
I OWN this NG and all it's feeble minded drones are my Thralls!
BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAAA
[Evil laugh of the NEW Warlord! B^]
Agnostics have long exerted intellectual and moral superiority
over atheists, just as we have NUMERIC superiority!!
They are just LOUDER, as befits a pack of screeching hysterics! B^]
# Subject: Re: US religious now at 85% - It's GOD in a LANDSLIDE!!!
# -Atheists wallow at 2.3% worldwide, 0.7% in the USA! -a pitiful
# fraction of the minority of non-believers! B^D
#
# From: fasgnadh <fasg...@yahoo.com.au>
# Newsgroups:
# alt.atheism,aus.religion,alt.religion,aus.politics,
# alt.politics.republicans, alt.politics.democrats,uk.politics.misc
# Message-ID: <8QNtl.26734$cu.1...@news-server.bigpond.net.au>
# Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 12:07:32 GMT
#
# American Religious Identification Survey, Summary Report March 2009:
#
# "Self-identification of U.S. Adult Population by Religious Tradition
#
# 2001 2008
#
# Non- religious 29,481,000 (14.1%) 34,169,000 (15%)
#
# Religious 167,254,000 (80%) 182,198,000 (80%)
#
# Agnostics 991,000 (0.5%) 1,985,000 (0.9%)
#
# Atheists 902,000 (0.4%) 1,621,000 (0.7%)
#
#
#
# BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAA!
#
#
# 0.7% of Americans!! B^D 2.3% worldwide!!! B^D
#
# 'NON-RELIGIOUS' DOES NOT = ATHEIST, YOU DISHONEST CRETINS!
#
#
# EVEN WE AGNOSTICS BEAT YOU!!! **AND** they grew FASTER!!!! B^D
Atheists: Only 4% of non-believers- 96% of non-believers reject atheism!
Virgil
fasgnadh <fasg...@yahoo.com.au> lied:
> > Quoting the Bible is, of course, so creative and original...
>
>
> That would be relevant, if, and only if, I was
> quoting the Bible!
Not at all. It would also be relevant if you misquoted the bible.
>
> Priceless!
Actually, Falsenuts is unable to distinguish between something being
priceless, like non-theism, and its being worthless, like all his own
posts.
> >> this example was posted by Virgil abut me:
> >>
> >> > It's really quite simple: Faggotnuts is embarrassed at being
> >> > caught out and is doing the Dance of the Flaming Arseholes* to
> >> > distract from his humiliation.
> >>
Virgil
fasgnadh wrote another witless forgery:
> Virgil wrote:
> > fasgnadhwrote another witless forgery:
> >
> >> Virgil wrote:
> >>> fasgnadhwrote another witless forgery:
> >>>> Howard Brazee wrote:
> >>>>> On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 14:18:53 -0800 (PST), Budikka666
> >>>>> <budi...@netscape.net> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>> That particular tool was used for both - that's what I was
> >>>>>>> comparing. The results are obviously different.
> >>>> >>
> >>>>>> As I indicated by my statement that "Avatar is nothing
> >>>>>> whatsoever like Polar Express".
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I'm so sorry you missed that. Please do forgive me. it was
> >>>>>> obviously my fault, because you quite obviously know
> >>>>>> everything, even about conditions on planets several light
> >>>>>> years away
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Interesting. What is it that I quite obviously know? (And
> >>>>> why didn't I tell me about it?)
>
Of course, FalseNuts RUNS AWAY from defending his falsehoods by
snipping all proofs of their falsehood and substituting his lies.
>
>
It's really quite simple: Falsenuts is embarrassed at being caught out
in so many lies and in such unprincipled hate-mongering and is doing
the Dance of the Flaming Arseholes* to distract from his degradation.
> >> When FalseNuts relies on such desperate duplicity, he has lost!
Virgil
fasgnadh <fasg...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> # Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 12:07:32 GMT
> #
> # American Religious Identification Survey, Summary Report March 2009:
> #
> # "Self-identification of U.S. Adult Population by Religious Tradition
> #
> # 2001 2008
> #
> # Non- religious 29,481,000 (14.1%) 34,169,000 (15%)
> #
> # Religious 167,254,000 (80%) 182,198,000 (80%)
> #
> # Agnostics 991,000 (0.5%) 1,985,000 (0.9%)
> #
> # Atheists 902,000 (0.4%) 1,621,000 (0.7%)
.
Mavisbeacon
> Mavisbeacon wrote:
>> fasgnadh wrote:
>>> Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Budikka666 <budi...@netscape.net> talks with her mouth full:
>>> >>
>>>>> : Let's completely forget that he doesn't know a thing about the
>>>>> phsyics
>>>>> : of this planet nor of the materials that were fapparently
>>>>> "floating" -
>>>>> : becuaser you all know as well as I do tha tunder no circumstnaces,
>>>>> : anywher eint eh unvierse under no conditions whatsoever
>>>>> : can.any.rocks.float.
>> Some boats are made of concrete,
>
> Some heads are made of wood, apparently.
>
> Are you claiming the "floating mountains" are hollow
> and float by displacing the thin breathable atmosphere of Pandora? B^]
No Im claiming nothing about Pandora or any other persons work of fiction.
Im claiming that rock could float.
"under no circumstnaces,: anywher in teh unvierse under no conditions
whatsoever: can.any.rocks.float." isnt a true statement.
>
> Why don't you demonstrate your theory by posting to
> youtube your success with a concrete balloon! B^D
It isnt necessary to make a concrete ballon or to travel to the far side of
the universe to prove that something COULD be within the bounds of
possibility.
>
>
> > and one could float an asteroid on a lake
>> of Mercury.
>
>
> Are you claiming the atmosphere on Pandora is Mercury?
Again Im not claiming anything about Pandora.
>
> How come we see so much detail through it, and how
> do the inhabitants move so quickly through it.
I havent seen the movie and know little or nothing about it.
>
> and WHY do their flying machines have propellers,
> if they can just 'displace' their own volume of 'Mercury'!?
>
I dont know! I didnt make any claims about the movie just about the claim
that ""under no circumstnaces,: anywher in teh unvierse under no conditions
whatsoever: can.any.rocks.float." which is a sweeping statement. they can
float.
Virgil
"Mavisbeacon" <Mavis...@nospam.forme> wrote:
> "fasgnadh" <fasg...@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
> news:pRZYm.64608$ze1....@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
> > Mavisbeacon wrote:
> >> fasgnadh wrote:
> >>> Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>> Budikka666 <budi...@netscape.net> talks with her mouth full:
> >>> >>
> >>>>> : Let's completely forget that he doesn't know a thing about the
> >>>>> phsyics
> >>>>> : of this planet nor of the materials that were fapparently
> >>>>> "floating" -
> >>>>> : becuaser you all know as well as I do tha tunder no circumstnaces,
> >>>>> : anywher eint eh unvierse under no conditions whatsoever
> >>>>> : can.any.rocks.float.
> [snip]
> >> Some boats are made of concrete,
> >
> > Some heads are made of wood, apparently.
> >
> > Are you claiming the "floating mountains" are hollow
> > and float by displacing the thin breathable atmosphere of Pandora? B^]
>
> No Im claiming nothing about Pandora or any other persons work of fiction.
> Im claiming that rock could float.
> "under no circumstnaces,: anywher in teh unvierse under no conditions
> whatsoever: can.any.rocks.float." isnt a true statement.
After certain volcanic eruptions, the surrounding seas are sometimes
littered with floating rocks.
This was noted by the Romans after Vesuvius went bang, and also by
sailors in the area after the Kakatoa bang.
Mavisbeacon
"Virgil" <Vir...@home.esc> wrote in message
news:Virgil-654D30....@bignews.usenetmonster.com...
i would think you mean "during" and not "After" eruption.
There would have to be molten magma for the rocks to float.
>
> This was noted by the Romans after Vesuvius went bang, and also by
> sailors in the area after the Kakatoa bang.
I doubt it since The locals were killed by the Earthquake which preceeded
the Eruption!
Also Herculanium and Pompeii were covered in several feet of ash and poision
gas rather than lava werent they?
Well ther was lava but only in Herculanium.
http://www.romanhomes.com/your_roman_vacation/quarters/pompeii-herculaneum.htm
Tim McGaughy
That can be your little secret.
Pumice floats.
Lamey the Cable Guy
wrote:
So does Ivory soap.
--
Usenet lits score:
GIT-R-DONE!
alt.usenet.legends.lamey
AUK Offishal Tinfoil Sombrero award 05/07
Sweetness Seal Of Approval #3
#20 Usenet asshole
#6 Lits Slut
#9 Cog in the AUK Hate Machine
<Approved by Lionel>
#11 Most posting trolls/hunters/flonkers 2007
#1 Disenfranchised AUK Kookologist.
#1 AUK Galactic Killfile Award
< we all know how well that works...LOL >
Co-inventer of the "Prongtard Yap-Dog Award"
<working on one of them specheel AUK awards>
St. Lamey - Patron Saint Of Bridges, Underpasses and Caves
< This space for rent >
Mavisbeacon
"Virgil" <Vir...@home.esc> wrote in message
news:Virgil-654D30....@bignews.usenetmonster.com...
Aha! Mayybe you are right, does pumice float? But what is a stone and what
is a rock? Maybe we are onto the "Petros/kephos" discussion LOL?
>
> This was noted by the Romans after Vesuvius went bang, and also by
> sailors in the area after the Kakatoa bang.
By which Romans? Pliny? 35 kms away?
Spartan613
"Mavisbeacon" <Mavis...@nospam.forme> wrote in message
news:8f9b0$4b4497b6$bc8d1d47$18...@news.upc.ie...
Floating rocks were evident in Rabaul Harbour after the last big eruption
there a few years ago. It's no big deal. They're simply very light and
displace more than they weigh.
How do you think a steel aircraft carrier manages to stay afloat.
--
"There's no shortcut to anywhere worth going".
Mavisbeacon
"Spartan613" <nos...@buggeroff.com> wrote in message
news:lLa1n.67327$ze1....@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
Actually to be correct a floating body displaces its own weight of fluid
not MORE than its
weight.
>
> How do you think a steel aircraft carrier manages to stay afloat.
Its average density is lessened by being filled with air so that the weight
of the carrier is less than than the amount of water it displaces?
I mean if you filled it with water it wouldnt float would it?
Similar for pumice. But it isnt a boulder rock or a mountain.
I dont require a lesson in fluid physics thank you.
John F. Eldredge
Herculaneum was buried by a pyroclastic flow, so there were very few
survivors. Pompeii was buried more gradually, by ash fall, so a good
many people did manage to escape.
Pumice is filled with gas bubbles; think of Styrofoam made of rock
instead of polystyrene.
--
John F. Eldredge -- jo...@jfeldredge.com
"Reserve your right to think, for even to think wrongly is better
than not to think at all." -- Hypatia of Alexandria
Greg Goss
>> After certain volcanic eruptions, the surrounding seas are sometimes
>> littered with floating rocks.
>
>i would think you mean "during" and not "After" eruption.
>There would have to be molten magma for the rocks to float.
Um, no.
http://images.google.com/images?q=pumice%20floats
--
Tomorrow is today already.
Greg Goss, 1989-01-27