Message from discussion GuthBall's Venusians moved to Mars ...
Received: by 10.68.202.37 with SMTP id kf5mr7117610pbc.7.1334499785192;
Sun, 15 Apr 2012 07:23:05 -0700 (PDT)
From: Brad Guth <bradg...@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: GuthBall's Venusians moved to Mars ...
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 07:23:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1334499785 8450 127.0.0.1 (15 Apr 2012 14:23:05 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 14:23:05 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: v17g2000pbt.googlegroups.com; posting-host=18.104.22.168; posting-account=nf79RwoAAABXjvy5ztMzmPxgY1WGoktI
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/11.0,gzip(gfe)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
On Apr 14, 2:49=A0pm, Sir Gilligan Horry <G...@ga7rm5er.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Apr 2012 12:30:11 -0700 (PDT), Brad Guth
> <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Apr 14, 11:50=A0am, "H=E4gar" <hs...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> "Brad Guth" <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >> On Apr 12, 9:08 am, "H=E4gar" <hs...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> >http://news.yahoo.com/monolith-object-mars-could-call-214004772.html
> >> Don't you ever get tired of regurgitating the same old cud ???
> >Nor any worse than yourself?
> The Universe is indeed old.
> Or maybe it's been there forever.
> Alt Alien Research Intelligence Agency Official Admiral Wizzard.
> =A0... here...http://bit.ly/gsYSvc
> "Project Mothership" UFOs Aliens Proof Evidence...http://www.geocities.ws=
> Documentary "WATER" ... by Saida Medvedeva.
> Beautiful Documentary ...http://www.voiceentertainment.net/movies/watermo=
> For Those Who Want To Know...http://www.WantToKnow.info
> Best Aliens UFOs Videos Proof Evidence...http://BestAliensUFOsVideos.blog=
> Aliens UFOs Extraterrestrials Videos Documentaries...http://YouTube.com/J=
Yes indeed it's old, and thus far we have nothing objective proving
that it's not a whole lot older than 13.75 GY.
Whatever planets. moons and asteroids associated with Sirius(B) should
date as being only 256 +/- some odd million years old, and those set
free from much older white dwarfs that have cooled below 3800 K should
be 1000+ GY old.
"Barrow and Tipler estimate that it would take 1e15 years for a white
dwarf to cool to 5 K", however, if weakly interacting massive
particles exist, it is possible that interactions with these particles
will keep some white dwarfs much warmer than this for approximately
The recent WDs of 3800 K and only 100 ly from us as being interpreted
as only 12 GY old is simply not possible, because anything of a WD
star that's cooled off by that much is simply much older. The only
other option is that these are a new breed of RDs or BDs of only .6s
Ms and considerable metallicity.
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / =93Guth Usenet=94